Could There Be an Israeli Martin Luther King? the Regressive Effect of Identity Politics on Israeli Society and the “Peace Camp”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Could there be an Israeli Martin Luther King? The regressive effect of identity politics on Israeli society and the “peace camp” Eva Illouz Could there be an Israeli Martin Luther King? The regressive effect of identity politics on Israeli society and the “peace camp” Eva Illouz While many Western democracies were fought by abolitionist and former slave founded on the basis of universalist Harriett Tubman in 1863. The collective constitutions (or morphed into that state), was formed by a group of African-American Israel, which was envisaged by its founding lesbians to differentiate themselves from fathers as a homeland for Jews, has been an mainstream feminist emancipation groups. ethnic project from the very start. Therefore, Because these women were lesbian and while in Europe and the US multiculturalism black, they claimed their needs and struggles was a form of democratization of the polity, were different and should be addressed in Israel it is universalism that represents as such. the only way to overcome tribalism and ethnic-nationalism. The upshot is that Israeli “[A]s children we realized that we were identity politics often only reconfirmed different from boys and that we were treated the preexisting ethnic character of the differently – for example, when we were told state. The Israeli case illuminates a larger in the same breath to be quiet both for the interesting fact: that identity politics do sake of being ‘ladylike’ and to make us less not take the same form or have the same objectionable in the eyes of white people. effects everywhere. While they contributed In the process of consciousness-raising, to the democratization of American society, actually life-sharing, we began to recognize in Israel identity politics have had deeply the commonality of our experiences and, regressive effects, pitching proponents of from the sharing and growing consciousness, identity against supporters of peace and to build a politics that will change our advocates of religion against secularists. lives and inevitably end our oppression… We realize that the only people who care enough about us to work consistently for our What are Identity Politics? liberation are us. Our politics evolve from a healthy love for ourselves, our sisters and Identity politics is a broad term that has our community which allows us to continue swept up liberal polities from the late 1970s our struggle and work. This focusing upon and especially from the 1980s and on. our own oppression is embodied in the concept of identity politics. We believe that One of the first documents to invoke the the most profound and potentially most term is the Combahee River Statement radical politics come directly out of our written by African-American women in 1978, own identity, as opposed to working to end concerning a struggle to free 750 slaves somebody else’s oppression.” [1] Heinrich Böll Stiftung Tel Aviv 2/11 Could there be an Israeli Martin Luther King? Eva Illouz This short passage contains most of the in one’s own identity, where identity is major components of identity politics. a set of hard properties – fixed, known Perhaps the key sentence is this: “We realize and stable. If identity stems from groups that the only people who care enough about uniquely defined and different from us to work consistently for our liberation are others, this logically entails In Israel identity״ us. Our politics evolve from a healthy love that my identity divides me for ourselves…” This sentence contains three from others: others cannot politics have features or beliefs central to identity politics: fight in my name, nor can I do it for them. This is because had regressive → The lesbian-black group does not count we can neither understand effects, pitching on others to defend their interests. Their nor represent the particular proponents of existential position and interests are experiences and positions of identity against so particular and different from other each other. Identity is precisely supporters mainstream groups that they have come what makes someone a of peace and to embrace a view of political struggles member of a unique tradition, advocates of as lacking the capacity to identify with memory and social location. causes other than one’s own. However religion against ״lofty political ideals may be, they will The upshot is that a universalist secularists reflect the specific social identities and policy of liberation is at best interests of the groups that formulate ineffective and at worst a sham. For them and will therefore be inadequate proponents of identity politics, universalism in representing the social experience of contains and hides its own identity, covers other groups; the identity of the majority and imposes it on members of minority groups. Identity politics in Israel These claims were quickly formalized״ never connected to a broad and theorized by new disciplines such as ,women’s studies, post-colonial studies ״ universalist agenda queer studies, and ethnicity studies, → Self-love is no longer a psychological justifying the claim that political struggles state but a political declaration. Why? of minorities were anchored in historical Because self-love is viewed as a practical identities. Identity politics started off as a response to the political evil that minority distinctly American phenomenon but quickly groups suffer from – lack of respect. This spread to the rest of the world, among other is a subtle shift from traditional notions things through the institutional mimesis of justice. Not only equality but also of academic organizations. The concept respect is now demanded from political was uncommonly suited to the American institutions. Respect concerns the self, polity, which conceived of civil society as a makes psychological demands on social patchwork of communities, each defending structures and settles more easily with their right to cultural autonomy. It stood in social injustice once the subjective sharp contrast to other democratic polities, conditions for the experience of lack of which had premised citizenship on a model self-respect are satisfied; of universal human rights, as was the case in French Republicanism. → The logical result of these new politics is that struggles cannot be waged for others. It is easy to understand why the late Arthur Political struggles must be grounded Schlesinger issued stern warnings against PEACEMISM | What Happened to the Israeli Peace Camp? 3/11 Could there be an Israeli Martin Luther King? Eva Illouz the politics of identity, seeing in them danger Identity Politics in Israel of fragmentation and disunity. Groups can find infinitesimal ways to gather around The Israeli model of citizenship started off common histories and memories, some real as quasi-republican: public virtue, frugality and some invented, thus breaking away from and commitment to democratic principles other groups also struggling to have their were guiding forces of this model in Israel rights recognized. This makes it difficult of the 1950s. It excluded the Arabs that to rally around broad common causes. remained within the borders of the newly Given the ways in which women had been established state, but for Jews presented treated as subalterns in socialist movements itself as a meeting point, an action plan for and the fact that few or no heterosexuals, forging new Israeli citizens. at least initially, defended and fought for the case of homosexuals, Schlesinger had The majority of the “Yishuv” – the people who overstated his point. Some groups needed fought for the creation of the Jewish state to particularize in order to affirm their – were secular Ashkenazis (i.e. of European universal rights. Yet his bleak prognosis descent). Their secularity was the result of would have proven poignant in the Israeli a process of European modernization that context, where identity politics attained a had started before Jewish nationalism per different meaning: because universalism se. Zionism represented a great historical has never been entrenched in Israel’s main compromise between cultural and religious institutions, identity politics only reproduced assimilation in Europe, on the one hand, the particularism and exclusions enshrined and the desire to renew Jewish identity, in the Israeli conception of citizenship. on the other. All or most of Israel’s national Identity politics in Israel never connected emblems, the rhetoric of returning to to a broad universalist agenda, as was the Zion and the public calendar were heavily case for women’s, gay or African-American borrowed from religious symbolism (for struggles in the United States. To better example, in the flag, the two blue stripes understand the influence of identity politics represent a tallit or prayer shawl, and both on Israeli society, we need to take a look at sides of the split Red Sea that the Hebrews the Israeli model of citizenship. ← Zionist leaders in Latrun, following the Agatha operation in 1946 Heinrich Böll Stiftung Tel Aviv 4/11 Could there be an Israeli Martin Luther King? Eva Illouz walked through as written in the Book of has come to characterize the Israeli polity. Exodus; the blue and white colors are derived While trying to create a new nation and from the Bible as well, where they are people, Zionism displayed an astonishing mentioned in several instances). Despite the lack of imagination in the boundaries it secular character of the Zionist movement, drew for this group, in deciding who is in Zionism not only borrowed heavily from and who is out – in short, in deciding on religious images and symbols but made citizenship. To create a new Jewish Israeli religion present in the establishment of collective, it needed both to exclude the the state itself. natives of the land (local Arabs) and to find a binding common denominator for diverse Far from negating religious Judaism (as Jews who came from various cultural and is sometimes claimed), Zionism made socio-economic backgrounds.