DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 UPDATE to MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN for Lincoln

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 UPDATE to MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN for Lincoln 2018 UPDATE TO MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FOR Lincoln COUNTY, MONTANA AND CITIES OF Libby & TROY TOWN OF EUREKA Prepared for: Lincoln County Emergency Management Agency 512 California Ave. Libby, Montana 59923 Prepared by: Tetra Tech Inc. 825 W. Custer Ave. Helena, Montana 59602 (406) 443-5210 December 2018 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1-1 1.2 AUTHORITY 1-1 1.3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 SCOPE AND PLAN ORGANIZATION 1-2 2.0 PLANNING PROCESS ......................................................................................2 -1 2.1 MHMP PLANNING TEAM .......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS ....................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 REVIEW OF EXISTING PLANS AND STUDIES ................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 PROJECT WEBSITE ...................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.5 PROJECT MEETINGS ................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.6 PLAN REVIEW ............................................................................................................................................... 2-6 3.0 COMMUNITY PROFILE ..................................................................................3 -1 3.1 PHYSICAL SETTING .................................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 CLIMATE ...................................................................................................................................................... 3-5 3.3 HISTORY ...................................................................................................................................................... 3-6 3.4 CRITICAL FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................. 3-7 3.4.1 Water and Wastewater Services ......................................................................................................3-8 3.4.2 Utilities .........................................................................................................................................................3-8 3.4.3 Transportation .........................................................................................................................................3-9 3.4.4 Law Enforcement and Emergency Services ............................................................................. 3-10 3.5 POPULATION TRENDS ............................................................................................................................ 3-10 3.6 HOUSING STOCK ........................................................................................................................................ 3-11 3.7 ECONOMY .................................................................................................................................................... 3-12 3.8 LAND USE AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 3-13 3.8.1 Land Use Implementation Tools.................................................................................................... 3-13 3.8.2 Future Development ........................................................................................................................... 3-16 4.0 RISK ASSESSMENT AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS .......................... 4-1 4.1 RISK ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Critical Facilities and Building Stock .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Vulnerable Population ....................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.1.3 Hazard Identification ......................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.1.4 Hazard Profiles ...................................................................................................................................... 4-8 4.1.5 Hazard Ranking and Priorities ................................................................................................... 4-10 4.1.6 Assessing Vulnerability - Estimating Potential Losses ..................................................... 4-13 The picture can't be displayed. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan – Lincoln County, Montana December 2018 i Table of Contents 4.1.7 Data Limitations ................................................................................................................................ 4-13 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.2 WILDFIRE .................................................................................................................................................... 4-14 4.3 HAZ-MAT INCIDENTS & TRANSPORTATION ACCIDENTS ...................................................... 4-26 4.4 FLOODING ................................................................................................................................................... 4-40 4.5 DISEASE ................................................................................................................................................... 4-53 4.6 WORKPLACE VIOLENCE/ACTIVE SHOOTER ................................................................................ 4-59 4.7 SEVERE WEATHER ................................................................................................................................... 4-61 4.8 TERRORISM, CIVIL UNREST & CYBER SECURITY ........................................................................ 4-70 4.9 DAM FAILURE ............................................................................................................................................. 4-75 4.10 RISK ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 4-83 5.0 MITIGATION STRATEGY ...............................................................................5 -1 5.1 BACKGROUND AND PAST MITIGATION ACCOMPLISHMENTS ................................................ 5-1 5.2 GENERAL MITIGATION PLANNING APPROACH ............................................................................. 5-5 5.3 MITIGATION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 5-5 5.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................... 5-7 5.4.1 Summary of Programs and Resources Available to Support Mitigation .......................5-7 5.4.2 Administrative and Technical Capabilities ............................................................................ 5-8 5.4.3 Fiscal Capabilities ......................................................................................................................... 5-13 5.5 MITIGATION STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 5-18 5.5.1 Mitigation Strategy Update and Reconciliation ................................................................ 5-18 5.5.2 Mitigation Strategy Benefit/Cost Review and Prioritization ....................................... 5-19 5.5.3 Project Implementation .............................................................................................................. 5-20 6.0 PLAN MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES ......................................................... 6-1 6.1 MONITORING, EVALUATING AND UPDATING THE PLAN ......................................................... 6-1 6.1.1 2011 PDM Plan .........................................................................................................................................6-1 6.1.2 2018 MHMP ...............................................................................................................................................6-1 6.2 MONITORING PROGRESS OF MITIGATION ACTIVITIES ............................................................. 6-2 6.2.1 2011 PDM Plan .........................................................................................................................................6-2 6.2.2 2018 MHMP ...............................................................................................................................................6-2 6.3 IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH EXISTING PROGRAMS ................................................................ 6-3 6.4 CONTINUED PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ................................................................................................. 6-5 7.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................7 -1 The picture can't be displayed. Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan – Lincoln County, Montana December 2018 ii Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1-1 Agencies Represented on the MHMP Planning Team ..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Weather Service Reference Guide
    National Weather Service Reference Guide Purpose of this Document he National Weather Service (NWS) provides many products and services which can be T used by other governmental agencies, Tribal Nations, the private sector, the public and the global community. The data and services provided by the NWS are designed to fulfill us- ers’ needs and provide valuable information in the areas of weather, hydrology and climate. In addition, the NWS has numerous partnerships with private and other government entities. These partnerships help facilitate the mission of the NWS, which is to protect life and prop- erty and enhance the national economy. This document is intended to serve as a reference guide and information manual of the products and services provided by the NWS on a na- tional basis. Editor’s note: Throughout this document, the term ―county‖ will be used to represent counties, parishes, and boroughs. Similarly, ―county warning area‖ will be used to represent the area of responsibility of all of- fices. The local forecast office at Buffalo, New York, January, 1899. The local National Weather Service Office in Tallahassee, FL, present day. 2 Table of Contents Click on description to go directly to the page. 1. What is the National Weather Service?…………………….………………………. 5 Mission Statement 6 Organizational Structure 7 County Warning Areas 8 Weather Forecast Office Staff 10 River Forecast Center Staff 13 NWS Directive System 14 2. Non-Routine Products and Services (watch/warning/advisory descriptions)..…….. 15 Convective Weather 16 Tropical Weather 17 Winter Weather 18 Hydrology 19 Coastal Flood 20 Marine Weather 21 Non-Precipitation 23 Fire Weather 24 Other 25 Statements 25 Other Non-Routine Products 26 Extreme Weather Wording 27 Verification and Performance Goals 28 Impact-Based Decision Support Services 30 Requesting a Spot Fire Weather Forecast 33 Hazardous Materials Emergency Support 34 Interactive Warning Team 37 HazCollect 38 Damage Surveys 40 Storm Data 44 Information Requests 46 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Libby, Montana
    NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 31st Annual Field Conference Libby, Montana August 3-6, 2006 Published by The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 http://trgs.org Edited by: Richard I. Gibson and Robert C. Thomas Cover: Miners, Snowshoe Gulch, 1897. From Mrs. Sam Ratekin and Spokane Statesman-Review, 1959. Above: Cross section based on gravity modeling. From M.D. Kleinkopf, Geophysical Interpretations of the Libby Thrust Belt, U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 1546, 1997. The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. P.O. Box 2734 Missoula, Montana 59806 Officers, 2006: President: Larry Smith, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte Vice-President: James Sears, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Secretary-Treasurer: George Furniss, MT Dept. of Environmental Quality, Helena Corresponding Secretary: Emily Geraghty, Dept. of Geology, Univ. of Montana, Missoula Webmaster: Dick Gibson Board of Directors, 2006: Richard B. Berg, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte, MT Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Richard I. Gibson, Gibson Consulting, Butte, MT Larry Johnson, Consultant, Missoula, MT Robert C. Thomas, Dept. of Environmental Sciences, U. of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT Conference Organizers, Libby Field Conference: Bruce E. Cox, Stillwater Mining Co., Nye, MT Marie Marshall Garsjo, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Ft. Worth, TX Ann Marie Gooden, Libby, MT ISSN: 0096-7769 © 2006 The Tobacco Root Geological Society, Inc. http://trgs.org ii NORTHWEST GEOLOGY The Journal of The Tobacco Root Geological Society Volume 35, 2006 Libby Field Conference Table of Contents Author Page Title Montana DEQ 1 Libby District Historical Mine Narrative Art Montana 11 The Rainy Creek alkaline ultramafic igneous complex near Libby, MT Montana DEQ 17 Rainy Creek Historical Mine Narrative Derek L.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed
    BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY MINISTRY OF ENERGY, MINES AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES LAKE KOOCANUSA HIGH LEVEL ASSESSMENT OF A PROPOSED DAM FINAL DRAFT PROJECT NO.: 0466001 DATE: November 19, 2020 BGC ENGINEERING INC. AN APPLIED EARTH SCIENCES COMPANY Suite 500 - 980 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 0C8 Telephone (604) 684-5900 Fax (604) 684-5909 November 19, 2020 Project No.: 0466001 Kathy Eichenberger, Executive Director Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources PO Box 9314, Stn Prov Govt Victoria, BC V8W 9N1 Dear Kathy, Re: Lake Koocanusa, High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT BGC is pleased to provide the Ministry of Mines, Energy and Petroleum Resources with the following FINAL DRAFT report. The report details an assessment of a proposed dam on Lake Koocanusa, in southeastern British Columbia. If you have any questions or comments, please contact the undersigned at 604-629-3850. Yours sincerely, BGC ENGINEERING INC. per: Hamish Weatherly, M.Sc., P.Geo. Principal Hydrologist Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Lake Koocanusa November 19, 2020 High Level Assessment of a Proposed Dam – FINAL DRAFT Project No.: 0466001 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Libby Dam is a 129 m high concrete gravity dam located on the Kootenay River near Libby, Montana. The dam was completed in 1973 and was first filled in 1974, inundating the Kootenay River valley to form the 145 km long Koocanusa Reservoir (Lake Koocanusa). Canadian residents and water users are affected by changes in the Libby Dam operations that affect reservoir water levels, as nearly half (70 km) of the reservoir extends into southeastern British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit, District, and Council General and Contingency Planning Guide for Boy Scouts of America©
    Doctorial Project for Completion of the Degree Doctorate, Commissioner’s Science Boy Scouts of America University of Scouting Commissioner’s College Unit, District, and Council General and Contingency Planning Guide for Boy Scouts of America© Version 0.99b 4 February 2010 By Larry D. Hahn, Lt Col, USAF Ret Unit Commissioner Chesapeake Bay District Colonial Virginia Council 2010 - BSA General n Contingency Planning Guide - L. Hahn.docx Approval Letter Advisor Memorandum for Record To: Larry D. Hahn, Unit Commissioner (Doctorial Candidate) From: Ronald Davis, District Commissioner (Candidate’s Advisor) CC: Lloyd Dunnavant, Dean, Commissioners College Date: January 10, 2019 Re: Approval of BSA Scout University Doctorial Project After careful review of the submitted project from Larry D. Hahn for completion of his Commissioner’s College doctorial degree, I grant my approved and acceptance for the degree of Doctorate (PhD) in Commissioner’s Science through the Boy Scouts of America, University of Scouting. As of this date, and as his advisor, I submit this signed letter as official documentation of approval. Ronald Davis Advisor Chesapeake Bay District Commissioner Approval Letter Council Commissioner Memorandum for Record To: Larry D. Hahn, Unit Commissioner (Doctorial Candidate) From: Mike Fry, Council Commissioner CC: Ronald Davis, District Commissioner (Candidate’s Advisor) Date: January 10, 2019 Re: Approval of BSA Scout University Doctorial Project After careful review of the submitted project from Larry D. Hahn for completion of his Commissioner’s College doctorial degree, I grant my approved and acceptance for the degree of Doctorate (PhD) in Commissioner’s Science through the Boy Scouts of America, University of Scouting.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review
    U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • Bonneville Power Administration Columbia River Treaty History and 2014/2024 Review 1 he Columbia River Treaty History of the Treaty T between the United States and The Columbia River, the fourth largest river on the continent as measured by average annual fl ow, Canada has served as a model of generates more power than any other river in North America. While its headwaters originate in British international cooperation since 1964, Columbia, only about 15 percent of the 259,500 square miles of the Columbia River Basin is actually bringing signifi cant fl ood control and located in Canada. Yet the Canadian waters account for about 38 percent of the average annual volume, power generation benefi ts to both and up to 50 percent of the peak fl ood waters, that fl ow by The Dalles Dam on the Columbia River countries. Either Canada or the United between Oregon and Washington. In the 1940s, offi cials from the United States and States can terminate most of the Canada began a long process to seek a joint solution to the fl ooding caused by the unregulated Columbia provisions of the Treaty any time on or River and to the postwar demand for greater energy resources. That effort culminated in the Columbia River after Sept.16, 2024, with a minimum Treaty, an international agreement between Canada and the United States for the cooperative development 10 years’ written advance notice. The of water resources regulation in the upper Columbia River U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on the Winter Weather Program Partner Webinar October
    N A UT NI O I NT AE LD O SC TE A NT IE C S A ND DE PA AT MR OT SM P E H N E TR I CO FA D C M OI NM I MS TE R R A C T EI O N N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D NationalA T M O S P H E RWeather I C A D M I N I S ServiceT R A T I O N Update on Winter Weather Initiatives Partner Webinar October 10, 2017 Dave Soroka: Winter Weather Program Lead 1 N A UT NI O I NT AE LD O SC TE A NT IE C S A ND DE PA AT MR OT SM P E H N E TR I CO FA D C M OI NM I MS TE R R A C T EI O N N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E ROutline I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N PART I: • What’s new this winter • Hazard Simplification (Consolidation/Reformatting) • Snow Squall Warning • Operational Day 4-7 Winter Outlook • Expanded and Improved Probabilistic Snow • Questions and comments PART II: • Where are we going? • Experiments and Prototypes • Best Practices • Outreach/Awareness resources • Questions and comments 2 N A UT NI O I NT AE LD O SC TE A NT IE C S A ND DE PA AT MR OT SM P E H N E TR I CO FA D C M OI NM I MS TE R R A C T EI O N NWhat’s A T I O N Anew L O Cthis E A N winter:I C A N D A T M O HazardS P H E R I CSimplification A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Simplifying the Winter Products Consolidating existing products Consistent and impact based formatting 3 N A UT NI O I NT AE LD O SC TE A NT IE C S A ND DE PA AT MR OT SM P E H N E TR I CO FA D C M OI NM I MS TE R R A C T EI O N N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D WhyA T M OHazard S P H E R I C Simplification?A D M I N I S T R A T I O N The WWA System...What Are The Issues? Orthogonal Logic Too Many Products! Ansorge, 2017 4 N A UT NI O I NT AE LD O SC TE A NT IE C S A ND DE PA AT MR OT SM P E H N E TR I CO FA D C M OI NM I MS TE R R A C T EI O N N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A WhatT M O S P HAre E R I C The A D M I NIssues? I S T R A T I O N ●We often replace one WWA with another: WINTER STORM WARNING IS CANCELLED… BLIZZARD WARNING IN EFFECT UNTIL 11:30 PM… ●And we also often upgrade/downgrade ICE STORM WARNING IS CANCELLED… WINTER WEATHER ADVISORY IN EFFECT UNTIL 6 PM SUNDAY..
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 27 – the Roaring Sixties
    Chapter 27 The roaring Sixties The Anaconda Aluminum Co. smelter came into the 1960s running at 87.5% of capacity after implementing a successful downstream expansion during a time of weak aluminum markets. Cautious at first, the Anaconda Company approached the decade with a modest expansion by one potline at first, then followed up with two more simultaneously. Supporting the company’s bullish optimism were a strong and growing market and a new source of hydroelectric power not far from the Flathead Valley. By 1960, Anaconda was in sixth place among U.S. aluminum producers for existing capacity or capacity under construction at 65,000 tons per year and 2.4% of total U.S. capacity. Total U.S. capacity was 2.6 million tons. The top five U.S. producers included Alcoa with 1 million tons or 38.6%; Reynolds with 701,000 tons or 26.4%; Kaiser with 609,000 tons or 23%; Ormet with 180,000 tons or 6.8%; and Harvey Aluminum with 75,000 tons or 2.8%. 1 Growth in the surrounding community was moving ahead of the plant. According to the 1960 census, Columbia Falls was the fastest growing city in Flathead County, increasing in population by 70% over the past decade to 2,126 residents. Growth was related to new jobs created in Columbia Falls, particularly by the new AAC plant and the lumber industry. 2 The smelter employed 560 workers with an annual payroll of $3.8 million. Columbia Falls’ four lumber mills – Plum Creek, F.H. Stoltze Land & Lumber, Rocky Mountain Lumber, and Superior Buildings – employed about 400 workers in year-round operations while another 200 workers brought logs in from nearby forests.
    [Show full text]
  • National Weather Service Reference Guide
    National Weather Service Reference Guide Purpose of this Document he National Weather Service (NWS) provides many products and services which can be T used by other governmental agencies, Tribal Nations, the private sector, the public and the global community. The data and services provided by the NWS are designed to fulfill us- ers’ needs and provide valuable information in the areas of weather, hydrology and climate. In addition, the NWS has numerous partnerships with private and other government entities. These partnerships help facilitate the mission of the NWS, which is to protect life and prop- erty and enhance the national economy. This document is intended to serve as a reference guide and information manual of the products and services provided by the NWS on a na- tional basis. Editor’s note: Throughout this document, the term ―county‖ will be used to represent counties, parishes, and boroughs. Similarly, ―county warning area‖ will be used to represent the area of responsibility of all of- fices. The local forecast office at Buffalo, New York, January, 1899. The local National Weather Service Office in Tallahassee, FL, present day. 2 Table of Contents Click on description to go directly to the page. 1. What is the National Weather Service?…………………….………………………. 5 Mission Statement 6 Organizational Structure 7 County Warning Areas 8 Weather Forecast Office Staff 10 River Forecast Center Staff 13 NWS Directive System 14 2. Non-Routine Products and Services (watch/warning/advisory descriptions)..…….. 15 Convective Weather 16 Tropical Weather 17 Winter Weather 18 Hydrology 19 Coastal Flood 20 Marine Weather 21 Non-Precipitation 23 Fire Weather 24 Other 25 Statements 25 Other Non-Routine Products 26 Extreme Weather Wording 27 Verification and Performance Goals 28 Impact-Based Decision Support Services 30 Requesting a Spot Fire Weather Forecast 33 Hazardous Materials Emergency Support 34 Interactive Warning Team 37 HazCollect 38 Damage Surveys 40 Storm Data 44 Information Requests 46 3.
    [Show full text]
  • NWSI 10-1701, “Text Product Formats and Codes,” Dated March 29, 2018
    Department of Commerce • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration • National Weather Service NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INSTRUCTION 10-1701 OCTOBER 29, 2019 Operations and Services Dissemination Services NWSPD 10-17 TEXT PRODUCT FORMATS AND CODES NOTICE: This publication is available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/. OPR: DIS (A. Hardy) Certified by: W/DIS (M. Mainelli-McInerny) Type of Issuance: Routine SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: This directive supersedes NWSI 10-1701, “Text Product Formats and Codes,” dated March 29, 2018. Changes were made to reflect the addition of Section 8 – 11 to address actions to take when inadvertent messages are sent by NWS or by a third party. Content changes were made to: 1. Throughout the document, updated titles and sections for formatting, section reference numbers and web links to correct sites. 2. Add Section 8, Recommended Actions to Take Following the Inadvertent NWS Dissemination of Messages by NWS Offices. 3. Add Section 9, Steps to Take After a Correctly-Formatted NWS Message is Incorrectly Disseminated by a Third Party 4. Add Section 10, Steps to Take for Messaging After an Inadvertent Dissemination of Test Alerts by a Third Party 5. Add Section 11, Role of NWS Rapid Response Team 6. Updated Appendix B, Section 2.3 to rewrite message example in mixed case. /signed/ 10/15/19____ Michelle Mainelli-McInerney Date Director, Office of Dissemination NWSI 10-1701 OCTOBER 29, 2019 Text Product Formats and Codes – Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Mission Connection ...........................................................................................................5 1.2 Text Products in Languages Other Than English ............................................................. 5 1.3 Format of Text Examples ..................................................................................................5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • KJAX 2018 Product Criteria.Xlsx
    Product Criteria Coastal Products Coastal Flood Statement Used to describe coastal hazards that do not meet advisory, warning or watch criteria such as minor beach erosion & elevated (Action) water levels. Coastal Flood Advisory Highlight minor flooding like tidal overflow that is imminent or possible within 12 Hours& if confidence is high (equal to or greater than 50%), then may extend or set to begin within 24 hrs. Coastal Flood Watch Significant coastal flooding is possible. This includes Moderate and Major flooding in the Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service (AHPS) product. Coastal Flood Warning Significant coastal flooding is occurring, imminent or highly likely. This includes Moderate and Major flooding in AHPS. High Surf Advisory Breaker heights ≥ 7 Feet Rip Current Statement When a high risk of rip currents is expected Marine Products Small Craft Exercise Caution Winds 15-20 knots and/or seas 6 Feet Small Craft Advisory Winds 20-33 knots and/or seas ≥ 7 Feet Small Craft Advisory (seas only) Winds< 20 knots & seas ≥ 7 Feet (usually with a swell) Gale Watch Wind speed 34-47 knots or frequent gusts 34-47 knots Gale Warning Wind speed 34-47 knots or frequent gusts 34-47 knots Storm Watch Wind speed 48-63 knots or gusts of 48-63 knots Storm Warning Wind speed 48-63 knots or gusts of 48-63 knots Marine Dense Fog Advisory Widespread visibility < 1 nautical mile in fog Marine Dense Smoke Advisory Widespread visibility < 1 nautical mile in smoke Marine Weather Statement Update or cancel at Special Marine Warning (SMW), a statement on non-severe showers & thunderstorms, short-lived wind/sea increase that could be dangerous for small boats, significant conditions prevailing for 2+ Hours that could impact marine operations including: rough seas near inlets/passes, dense fog, low water events, HAZMAT spills, rapidly increasing/decreasing or shifting winds, or details on potential water landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Withdrawal Impact of the Libby Dam Project on Local Government Administration Lincoln County Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1975 Analysis of the withdrawal impact of the Libby Dam project on local government administration Lincoln County Montana Richard D. Gillmore The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gillmore, Richard D., "Analysis of the withdrawal impact of the Libby Dam project on local government administration Lincoln County Montana" (1975). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5135. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5135 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF THE WITHDRAWAL IMPACT OF THE LIBBY DAM PROJECT ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION: LINCOLN COUNTY, MONTANA By Richard D. Gillmore B.A., Western Washington State College, 1972 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1975 Approved byi Chairman, Board of Examiners __ Deg^l, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP40599 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Weather Preparation
    Upshur County Office of Emergency Management Winter Weather Preparation Before Winter Storms and Extreme Cold To Prepare For A Winter Storm You Should Add The Following Supplies To Your Emergency Kit: • Rock salt or more environmentally safe products to melt ice on walkways • Sand to improve traction • Snow shovels and other snow removal equipment • Sufficient heating fuel - You may become isolated in your home and regular fuel sources may be cut off. Store a good supply of dry, seasoned wood for your fireplace or wood-burning stove. • Adequate clothing and blankets to keep you warm • Make a Family Communications Plan. Your family may not be together when disaster strikes, so it is important to know how you will contact one another, how you will get back together and what you will do in case of an emergency. • Listen to a NOAA Weather Radio or other local news channels for critical information from the National Weather Service (NWS). Be alert to changing weather conditions. Upshur County Residents can receive free Weather Alerts by signing up for NIXLE at http://www.NIXLE.com and entering your zip code. • Minimize travel - If travel is necessary, keep a disaster supplies kit in your vehicle. • Bring pets/companion animals inside during winter weather. Move other animals or livestock to sheltered areas with non-frozen drinking water. Winterize Your Vehicle Check or have a mechanic check the following items on your car: • Antifreeze levels - ensure they are sufficient to avoid freezing. • Battery and ignition system - should be in top condition and battery terminals should be clean.
    [Show full text]