DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction ...4 History of Container and Piggyba

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Contents Introduction ......................................... 4 Chapter 1 History of container and piggyback traffic................. 5 Chapter 2 Piggyback trailers .................................... 16 Chapter 3 Containers ......................................... 28 Chapter 4 Trailer and container flatcars ........................... 42 Chapter 5 Double-stack container cars............................ 56 Chapter 6 Spine and skeleton cars ............................... 70 Chapter 7 Roadrailers and Flexi-Vans ............................. 79 Chapter 8 End-loading terminals ................................ 91 Chapter 9 Modern intermodal terminals.......................... 103 Chapter 10 Intermodal operations ............................... 115 Bibliography ....................................... 125 About the author ................................... 127 Two Minneapolis & St. Louis trailers with the railroad’s Piggyback Quick slogan roll through a Midwestern town on an 85-foot Trailer Train flatcar in 1961. The M&StL had been merged into the Chicago & North Western the year before, but its trailers were carrying on the service. J. David Ingles collection INTRODUCTION Piggyback and container traffic articles listed there present highly Modeling represents a fascinating—and very detailed information on prototype When modeling, all facets of modelable—part of railroad history equipment, as well as in-depth, step- intermodal traffic from any era from and operations. Trailer-on-flatcar by-step instructions and photos for the 1930s to the present are accessible. (TOFC) began booming in the modeling trailers, railcars, and related A wide variety of railcars, trailers, mid-1950s. With the coming of accessories. containers, and loading equipment international shipping containers in the Railroad historical societies is available in HO and N scales, in late 1960s, trailer and container traffic are another excellent source of particular. (together, they comprise intermodal) information. Most publish periodicals, Many small manufacturers have grew to become the largest revenue and many of these contain detailed produced resin or limited-run kits for source for railroads today. articles on a railroad’s trailer and obscure trailers and other equipment, No one book can detail every container operations, including although some of these are no longer facet of each railroad’s history and history, equipment, train schedules, available (or were discontinued operations, or cover all the variations and basic train operations. Some many years ago). However, don’t be of every type of flatcar, double-stack, societies have articles, photos, and discouraged. If a model has been or spine car. Entire books have been reference information available on produced, it’s available somewhere. written about a single equipment type their websites. Check eBay and other online auction or class. This book is meant to be a Check various websites. A simple sites and shops (eBay lets you save a guide for your overall modeling efforts, Google search will yield many search and will send you a message and it covers the highlights (worrying photographs and potential sites, but when something matching your search about detailed spotting features and be aware that the quality of individual criteria is listed). minutia would have meant omitting websites can range from excellent to Whether it’s modeling a complete other features). sketchy. Try to find as many sources as modern lift terminal, solid trains of The bibliography on page 125 possible to verify information. Websites piggyback and container traffic, a lists the key sources used, and they of model manufacturers and prototype small-town loading ramp, or just a can provide you with more detailed manufacturers are a good source for few trailers on trains passing through, information about various car types details on current equipment, and some almost any layout will benefit from and other equipment. Many of the have additional historical information. adding intermodal models. 4 16 A westbound double-stack train heads west on Union Pacific’s double-track main line through Nebraska in 2006. the 1920s—fizzled out because of over- late 1960s, Sea-Land had a fleet what was comparatively small share of regulation, but containerized freight of more than 30 ships and 27,000 the market. There was also the issue would eventually revolutionize both containers, and it was sailing routes to of dock workers, who knew their jobs international and domestic shipping. Germany, Scotland, the Netherlands, would be eliminated. Although there were many abortive Hong Kong, Thailand, and the attempts at shipping with containers, Philippines. Standardization credit for the concept and successful In the meantime, a few railroads The answer would come, as it execution of using a large (truck trailer had dabbled in container traffic, did for piggyback, in the form of size) container that could be transferred including the Southern, Missouri standardization. As early as the late from a ship to railcar to truck goes Pacific, Baltimore & Ohio, and New 1950s, there was talk of adopting to Malcolm McLean, a trucker from York Central. Most met with minimal standard container sizes. In the North Carolina. success, with the exception of NYC’s United States, a subcommittee of McLean knew transferring unique Flexi-Van system (more on that the National Defense Transportation containers directly would save in chapter 4). Association (NDTA) met in 1958 and transloading time and thus money—a A limitation for containers through recommended that containers be 20 or significant challenge in dealing with the 1960s was that each container 40 feet in length (maximum U.S. trailer large cargo ships. In the early 1950s, system—including Sea-Land’s, those length had just been stretched to 40 after unsuccessfully trying to peddle his of other shipping companies, and each feet), 8 feet wide, and 8 feet tall. idea to steamship companies, McLean railroad’s—was proprietary, 14. Each There was international interest finally just did it himself. He sold his used a unique container size, required in the idea as well, and Sea-Land trucking company and worked with different highway chassis, and used and several other companies were Fruehauf to develop 35-foot containers. different means of stowing aboard in favor—although there was some He then bought the Pan-Atlantic ships. Containers required special disagreement on what the standards Steamship Company and several old cradles on flatcars or, more commonly, should be. In 1965, size standards were World War II-era T-2 tankers and simply rode on chassis as piggyback officially adopted by the International had them rebuilt to carry the new trailers. Organization for Standardization containers. Thus, even though McLean’s (commonly referred to as ISO), On April 26, 1956, one of the business flourished, and rival shipping resulting in what has become known as 524-foot refitted tankers—christened lines began copying the idea, container the international or ISO container. The the Ideal X—made its first revenue trip, freight still represented a small fraction standard was for containers 8 feet wide carrying 58 loaded containers from of international shipping. Most ports and 8 feet tall, with lengths of 10, 20, Newark, N.J., to Houston. couldn’t easily handle containers, and 30, and 40 feet. (The most common, McLean’s venture (renamed Sea- weren’t willing to make the investment by far, would become the 20- and Land in 1961) was a success. By the in cranes and other alterations for 40-footers.) 14 17 BNSF’s Logistics Park Kansas City opened in 2013. It covers more than 400 acres and features five 90-foot-tall cranes serving six 8,000-foot-long working tracks. BNSF A key part the standard, adopted growing number of international in 1967, was the connecting system. containers. The double-stack well Intermodal timeline Based on Sea-Land’s containers, the car, introduced in 1981, greatly standard called for oval slots located at improved the efficiency of transporting 1926: North Shore begins LCL each container’s top and bottom corner. containers. Within a few years, double- piggyback service These slots would accommodate a turn- stacks were carrying international 1936: Chicago Great Western begins lock connector (an IBC, for inter-box and domestic containers on routes long-haul TOFC service with connector; also called a twist-lock) to throughout North America, 16. common carrier trailers allow containers to be stacked, and to Piggyback trailer traffic was 1955: First run of Pennsylvania RR provide standard connection points for declining, and much of what railroads dedicated TrucTrain service truck chassis, railcars, and overhead were hauling were common-carrier and 1956: Trailer Train Co. (now TTX) loaders, 15. leased trailers, with a lot of domestic begins operations This standardization made possible intermodal traffic moving to containers. 1956: First container ship makes the wholesale adoption of containers By 2010, there were few railroad- revenue trip by international and domestic shipping owned trailers left. 1965: ISO container standards companies, railcars from multiple As shown in the chart on page 12, established manufacturers that could handle total annual container loadings first 1981: Double-stack well cars debut containers from any shipper, and the surpassed trailers in 1992. By 2000, on Southern Pacific ability to easily move containers among containers made up 74 percent of 1991: Trailer Train officially becomes ships,
Recommended publications

  • Private Freight Car System and Special Equipment Cars

    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY Class Book Volume Je 07-10M 4 wfcr •*, -aft Mi. # - 4 PRIVATE FREIGHT CAR SYSTEM AND SPECIAL EQUIPMENT CARS BY LOUIS DWIGHT HARVELL WELD, A. B. (BOWDOIN), '05 THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL University of Illinois 1907 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS June 1 1907 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Louis Dwight Haryell Weld, A.B., Bqwdoin College, 1906 entitled THE PRIVATE FREIGHT CAR SYSTEM AND SPECIAL EQUIPJPJNT CARS IS APPROVED BY ME AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF . ARTS d£^<L^-^^*r^^^^ o 102074 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/privatefreightcaOOweld . I f o f BIBLIOGRAPHY ON PRIVATE CARS Araour, J. Ogden. The Packers, the Private Oar Lines and the People. (This book is practically the same as the articles published in the Saturday Evening Post.) Baker, Ray Stannard .Railroads on Trial. McClure's Magazine, Jan- uary, *06. Beemer, D. B * Cold Storage Construction. Ice and Refriger- ation, September, 1894. Commercial and Financial Chronicle. Editorial on private cars. October 28, 1905. Commissioner of Corporations. Report on the Beef Industry. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1905. Drew, D. P. Private Cars from an Owner's Standpoint. Railway Age, Vol. 35, P. 150. Earle, P. S. Development of the Trucking Interests. Year- book, Department of Agriculture, 1900. Interstate Commerce Commission. Annual Reports. Interstate Commerce Commission. Hearing on Private Cars at Chicago October, 1904. Also, hearings on Private Cars in Washington October 18, and November 1, 1905.
  • Colorado Historical Society

    Colorado Historical Society

    OAHP1414 (Rev. 11/2001) COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLORADO STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES NOMINATION FORM SECTION I Name of Property Historic Name Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Bulkhead Flatcar No. 22488 Other Names D&RGW No. 22488 Address of Property address not for publication Street Address 800 Seminole Rd., Burnham Yard, Union Pacific Railroad City Denver County Denver Zip 80204-4200 Present Owner of Property (for multiple ownership, list the names and addresses of each owner on one or more continuation sheets) Name Marcus Rail c/o Daniel Quiat Address PO Box 3498 Phone 303-579-1506 City Boulder State CO Zip 80307-3498 Owner Consent for Nomination (attach signed consent from each owner of property - see attached form) Preparer of Nomination Name Property Owner Date 10/8/2006 Organization Address Phone City State Zip FOR OFFICIAL USE: Site Number 5DV10295 Nomination Received Senate # 18 House # 13 2/16/2007 Review Board Recommendation 2/22/2007 CHS Board State Register Listing Approval Denial Approved Denied Listing Criteria A B C D E Certification of Listing: President, Colorado Historical Society Date COLORADO STATE REGISTER OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES Property Name Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Bulkhead Flatcar No. 22488 SECTION II Local Historic Designation Has the property received local historic designation? no yes --- individually designated designated as part of a historic district Date designated Designated by (Name of municipality or county) Use of Property Historic Railroad freight service Current Historical
  • Freight Services the Alaska Railroad (ARRC) Provides Seam- ARM Barge Move from Whittier to Anchorage Or Less Freight Operation Between Shipping Points in Fairbanks

    Freight Services the Alaska Railroad (ARRC) Provides Seam- ARM Barge Move from Whittier to Anchorage Or Less Freight Operation Between Shipping Points in Fairbanks

    Freight Services The Alaska Railroad (ARRC) provides seam- ARM barge move from Whittier to Anchorage or less freight operation between shipping points in Fairbanks. Barges also move railcar shipments the Lower 48 to many destinations in Alaska. Port to/from Alaska via Prince Rupert, interchanging facilities in Seattle, Whittier, Seward and Anchor- with Canadian National Railway (CN). The CN age provide crucial links between marine and land barge was discontinued in early spring 2021. transportation modes. Rail yards in Seward, Whit- tier, Anchorage and Fairbanks offer centralized • Trailers/Containers on Flat Cars — TOFC/ distribution hubs for other transportation modes. COFC moves north and south between Seward, Whittier, Anchorage and Fairbanks. Freight Revenue & Expense • Coal — Coal from Usibelli Coal Mine in Healy Freight is the Alaska Railroad’s bread-and- moves to the Fairbanks area for local markets. butter, typically generating more than half of operating revenues (excluding capital grants). In • Gravel — Seasonally (April – October) aggregate 2019, a more typical year, the railroad hauled 3.49 products move from the Matanuska-Susitna million tons of freight, generating 56% of operating Valley to Anchorage. revenues. In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic dev- • Miscellaneous/In-state Local — Other freight astated ARRC’s passenger business and lowered includes specialty movements of very large or freight demand. As a result, ARRC hauled 2.8 mil- lion tons of freight, generating three-fourths (76%) oddly-shaped equipment and materials, as well of operating revenues. as in-state shipments of cement, scrap metal, Major lines of freight business include: military equipment and pipe. • Petroleum — Most petroleum products have While freight-hauling is a major revenue source, it also involves capital- and maintenance- moved from Anchorage to a fuel distribution intensive expense.
  • Ohio, Ex-Seatrain Ohio

    Ohio, Ex-Seatrain Ohio

    NATIONAL REGISTER ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT VESSEL: SS Ohio, ex-Seatrain Ohio Seatrain Puerto Rico, the first in a line of seven converted T2 tankers and sistership of the Ohio, underway circa late 1960s. Victory Ships and Tankers, L.A. Sawyer and W.H. Mitchell Vessel History The Seatrain Ohio was built in 1967 as a combination railway car/container‐carrying vessel for Seatrain Lines, Inc. of New York. It was constructed by recombining modified sections from three WWII T2 class tankers.1 The ship spent its active career on charter to the U.S. Military Sea Transportation Service (MSTS),2 which later became the Military Sealift Command (MSC). Engineer Graham M. Brush founded Seatrain Lines in 1928 to ferry railway cars loaded with goods between New Orleans, Louisiana and Havana, Cuba. The vessels were fitted with tracks and other special equipment so that railcars could move directly from the docks into the ships’ holds. The first vessel he adapted to carry railcars was a cargo ship. This vessel, the Seatrain New Orleans, carried loaded freight cars from New Orleans to Cuba for the first time in January of 1929. There were many advantages to this new service. It cut down on the amount of time 1 The T2 tanker, or T2, was an oil tanker constructed and produced in large quantities in the U.S. during World War II. The largest "navy oilers" at the time, nearly 500 of them, were built between 1940 and the end of 1945. 2 MSTS was a post-World War II combination of four predecessor government agencies that handled similar sealift functions.
  • Mather Refrigerator Instructions

    Mather Refrigerator Instructions

    HO Scale MATHER MEAT REFRIGERATOR CAR HISTORY - by Mr, Richard Hendrickson The Mather Stock Car Company of Chicago was founded early in the twentieth century by Alonzo C. Mather. As the company's name indicates, its primary business was the leasing of stock cars, which many railroads preferred to lease rather than buy because the stock business was highly seasonal. Mather branched out into leasing refrigerator cars in the 1920's. however, and beginning in the 1930's the company did a brisk business in box cars as well. The Mather fleet even included a few tank cars. Mather leased cars to railroads and shippers in many parts of the country and was modestly successful throughout the 1920's. However, it was during the severe depression following the 1929 stock market crash that the Mather company prospered. With most new railroads in financial distress and many in receivership, there was no capital with which to purchase new freight cars, yet serviceable cars were often urgently needed. Leasing provided a viable alternative, as leased freight cars could be paid for a little at a time out of current revenue. Mather's Chicago Ridge shops therefore worked overtime building and rebuilding cars in the early 1930's, at a time when other car builders were largely idle for lack of orders. Though Mather remained a relatively small company, it contained its profitable leasing business until, in the late 1950's, it was acquired by the North American Car Corporation. Mather's 37' Refrigerator Cars Among the cars in the Mather leasing fleet were several hundred 37' meat refrigerator cars which had been converted from stock cars.
  • The History of Transportation at Colgate University: an Analysis Of

    The History of Transportation at Colgate University: an Analysis Of

    The History of Transportation at Colgate University: An Analysis of the Environmental, Economic, and Social Impacts By Marisa Chiodo, Kathryn Deaton, and Jonathan Morales Colgate University i Executive Summary This report looks at how students, faculty, administrators, and staff from Colgate University have traveled to and from campus and around campus over the last two hundred years. With this data, we consider how transportation practices have been sustainable considering the environmental, social, and economic pillars. We operationalized sustainability by looking at fuel emissions and landscape changes for the environmental pillar, money expenditures, feasibility, and affordability for the economic pillar, and accessibility, time efficiency, and passenger health for the social pillar. We focused on four modes of transportation from the early 1800s to the late 1900s. These include stage lines on country roads and turnpikes, packet boats on the Chenango Canal, railroads, and automobiles. Stage lines on country roads and turnpikes were the primary mode of transportation in the early 1800s when traveling around Hamilton, but the region first really began to change with the introduction of the Chenango Canal. While the Chenango Canal was ultimately a financial failure for New York State, it moved the Chenango Valley away from subsistence agriculture to a commercial economy. The Canal influenced Colgate by bringing students in from farther states, and had a small impact in increasing the student population. The Chenango Canal was abandoned because railroads provided a much more attractive alternative as a faster, more economically feasible transportation mode. In the mid-19th century, the first railroad was built through Hamilton, to be followed by two more in the upcoming years.
  • Economics of Improved TOFC/COFC Systems Robert H

    Economics of Improved TOFC/COFC Systems Robert H

    6 basis. On a "maximum" cost basis, however, the ser­ high-rate service. At profitable rates, the Philadelphia­ vice is unprofitable at all rate levels. Cleveland and Chicago-Houston services would carry only 13 and 21 trailers a day, respectively. This dif­ Chicago-Houston City Pair fers from the more conventional concept of a TOFC shuttle train service, such as the "Slingshot," which The long distance between Chicago and Houston dis­ emphasizes low rates and high volume. It would be tinguishes this city pair from the other two. Al­ interesting to repeat this analysis assuming a lower though both rail and truck service tends to be fairly cost, but slower, less reliable service. It is possible good, a reliable TOFC shuttle train service is believed that such a service might prove more profitable than to offer some improvement in service over both. De­ the premium service hypothesized here. spite its long distance, the traffic between this pair of These models have allowed us to understand the cities is fairly heavy-roughly the same as between consequences of the multitude of individual firm deci­ Philadelphia and Cleveland. One might speculate that sions that will determine the market for a service. As the economies of rail line-haul operation would make such, they represent a considerable advance over other a TOFC shuttle train a profitable undertaking between methods, such as aggregate econometric models, which this pair of cities. require gross assumptions about the relationship of Figure 4 presents the comparison of revenues and transportation demand to the economy of a region. costs at various rate levels for the Chicago-Houston Better industry data, production-type demand models, TOFC shuttle train service.
  • New Items 2021 Locomotives and Wagons in Gauge H0 and N

    New Items 2021 Locomotives and Wagons in Gauge H0 and N

    * NEW ITEMS 2021 LOCOMOTIVES AND WAGONS IN GAUGE H0 AND N 2021A PASSION FOR DETAIL DISCOVER NUMEROUS NEW PRODUCTS PACKED WITH FASCINATING DETAILS BRAWA HAS In the 2021 New Items Brochure, BRAWA once again introduces a number comes to freight cars, the new SSt 125 heavy-duty wagons – rail giants EXCITING NEWS of new locomotives and wagons in H0 and N gauges. In H0, for example, that were used for unusual transports – will be added to the BRAWA the new TRAXX 3 electric locomotive of the BR 147/187 series in the range. These mighty wagons could carry a payload of up to 168 tons, current IC livery of Deutsche Bahn AG will be available from specialist which was distributed over 18 axles. Other new types include the Kds FOR 2021 retailers. The BRAWA models feature true-to-the-original ribbed side 54/56 powdered container cars, which feature numerous true-to-life panels and the BR 147 is faithfully equipped with an illuminated train details, as well as the K 25 lidded freight car, which were developed in destination display. the 1920s to transport moisture-sensitive goods. Among the wagons in H0 gauge there are numerous new types, such as In N gauge, BRAWA is introducing three new variants of the BR 132 diesel 02 GAUGE H0 08 Passenger coaches 62 GAUGE N the yl passenger coaches of the DB, which were used in numerous variants locomotive, which was put into service by the East-German Deutsche 02 Steam locomotives 30 Freight cars 62 Diesel locomotives as veritable workhorses in express train and city express traffic.
  • Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports

    Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports

    Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports July 2012 Committee for the Study of U.S. Inland Containerized Cargo Moving Through Canadian and Mexican Seaports Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr. - Chairman Lowry A. Crook - Former Chief of Staff Ronald Murphy - Managing Director Rebecca Fenneman - General Counsel Olubukola Akande-Elemoso - Office of the Chairman Lauren Engel - Office of the General Counsel Michael Gordon - Office of the Managing Director Jason Guthrie - Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services Gary Kardian - Bureau of Trade Analysis Dr. Roy Pearson - Bureau of Trade Analysis Paul Schofield - Office of the General Counsel Matthew Drenan - Summer Law Clerk Jewel Jennings-Wright - Summer Law Clerk Foreword Thirty years ago, U.S. East Coast port officials watched in wonder as containerized cargo sitting on their piers was taken away by trucks to the Port of Montreal for export. At that time, I concluded in a law review article that this diversion of container cargo was legal under Federal Maritime Commission law and regulation, but would continue to be unresolved until a solution on this cross-border traffic was reached: “Contiguous nations that are engaged in international trade in the age of containerization can compete for cargo on equal footings and ensure that their national interests, laws, public policy and economic health keep pace with technological innovations.” [Emphasis Added] The mark of a successful port is competition. Sufficient berths, state-of-the-art cranes, efficient handling, adequate acreage, easy rail and road connections, and sophisticated logistical programs facilitating transportation to hinterland destinations are all tools in the daily cargo contest.
  • HO F89 Autorack Gulf Mobile & Ohio Baltimore & Ohio Western Pacific*

    HO F89 Autorack Gulf Mobile & Ohio Baltimore & Ohio Western Pacific*

    Announced 10.25.19 HO F89 Autorack Orders Due: 11.22.19 Western Pacific* ETA: October 2020 Primed for Grime Era: 1976+ ATHG69541 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, WP TTBX #910807 ATHG69542 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, WP TTBX #910808 ATHG69543 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, WP TTBX #910809 #Ready2Rust Gulf Mobile & Ohio Era: 1975+ ATHG69535 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, GMO BTTX #912789 ATHG69536 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, GMO BTTX #912840 ATHG69537 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, GMO BTTX #912856 Baltimore & Ohio Era: 1964+ ATHG69538 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, BO BTTX #911880 ATHG69539 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, BO BTTX #911888 ATHG69540 HO F89-F Bi-Level Auto Rack, BO BTTX #911923 $54.98 Bi-Level SRP $56.98 Tri-Level SRP These items are subject to Horizon’s MAP policy * Union Pacific Licensed Product Visit Your Local Retailer | Visit www.athearn.com | Call 1.800.338.4639 Announced 10.25.19 HO F89 Autorack Orders Due: 11.22.19 Rio Grande* ETA: October 2020 Era: 1966+ ATHG69526 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, DRGW RTTX #910620 DRGW FEATURES: ATHG69527 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, DRGW RTTX #910796 • “When Empty Return to Southern ATHG69528 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, DRGW RTTX #910811 Pacific, Milpitas, Calif.” Wabash Era: 1964+ ATHG69529 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, WAB RTTX #911381 WAB FEATURES: ATHG69530 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, WAB RTTX #911395 • “When Empty Return to N&W RR, ATHG69531 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, WAB RTTX #911561 Detroit, MI.” Union Pacific* Era: 1964+ ATHG69532 HO F89-F Tri-Level Auto Rack, UP RTTX #911613 UP
  • Class I Railroad Annual Report

    Class I Railroad Annual Report

    OEEAA – R1 OMB Clearance No. 2140-0009 Expiration Date 08-31-15 Class I Railroad Annual Report Norfolk Southern Combined Railroad Subsidiaries Three Commercial Place Norfolk, VA 23510-2191 Full name and address of reporting carrier Correct name and address if different than shown (Use mailing label on original, copy in full on duplicate) To the Surface Transportation Board For the year ending December 31, 2015 NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule. 4. All entries should be made in a permanent black ink or typed. Those of a contrary character must be indicated in parenthesis. Items of an unusual character must be indicated by appropriate symbols and explained in footnotes. 5. Money items, except averages, throughout the annual report form should be shown in thousands of dollars adjusted to accord with footings.
  • Investing in Mobility

    Investing in Mobility

    Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION THE EAST OF HUDSON RAIL FREIGHT OPERATIONS TASK FORCE Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION Environmental Defense and the East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force On the cover Left:Trucks exacerbate crippling congestion on the Cross-Bronx Expressway (photo by Adam Gitlin). Top right: A CSX Q116-23 intermodal train hauls double-stack containers in western New York. (photo by J. Henry Priebe Jr.). Bottom right: A New York Cross Harbor Railroad “piggypacker” transfers a low-profile container from rail to a trailer (photo by Adam Gitlin). Environmental Defense is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective and fair. The East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force is committed to the restoration of price- and service-competitive freight rail service in the areas of the New York metropolitan region east of the Hudson River. The Task Force seeks to accomplish this objective through bringing together elected officials, carriers and public agencies at regularly scheduled meetings where any issue that hinders or can assist in the restoration of competitive rail service is discussed openly. It is expected that all participants will work toward the common goal of restoring competitive rail freight service East of the Hudson. ©2004 Environmental Defense Printed on 100% (50% post-consumer) recycled paper, 100% chlorine free.