DOCSLIB.ORG

CASE Report Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CASE Report Template Set-Top Boxes Codes and Standards Enhancement (CASE) Initiative For PY 2013: Title 20 Standards Development Analysis of Standards Proposal for Set-Top Boxes California Energy Commission DOCKETED 12-AAER-2A TN 71759 JUL 29 2013 Docket #12-AAER-2A July 29, 2013 Prepared for: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO GAS AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COMPANY EDISON ELECTRIC GAS COMPANY Prepared by: Gregg Hardy, Jeffrey Swofford, Suzanne Foster Porter, Apurva Pawashe, Katherine Dayem and Debbie Driscoll Ecova This report was prepared by the California Statewide Utility Codes and Standards Program and funded by the California utility customers under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission. Copyright 2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison, Southern California Gas, San Diego Gas & Electric. All rights reserved, except that this document may be used, copied, and distributed without modification. Neither PG&E, SCE, SoCalGas, SDG&E, nor any of its employees makes any warranty, express of implied; or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any data, information, method, product, policy or process disclosed in this document; or represents that its use will not infringe any privately-owned rights including, but not limited to, patents, trademarks or copyrights. Acknowledgements The CASE Team would like to thank NRDC, in particular, Noah Horowitz and Pierre Delforge for their contributions in the development of this standards proposal. Table of Contents 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 2 ACRONYMS................................................................................................................... 2 3 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 3 3.1 Overview ........................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Product Classes .................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Additional Functionality .......................................................................................... 4 3.4 Scope of Products .................................................................................................. 5 4 MANUFACTURING AND MARKET CHANNEL OVERVIEW ......................................... 6 5 ENERGY USAGE............................................................................................................. 8 5.1 Test Methods ....................................................................................................... 8 5.1.1 Current Test Methods ........................................................................................................ 8 5.1.2 Proposed Test Methods ....................................................................................................... 9 5.2 Baseline Energy Use Per Product ............................................................................... 9 5.2.1 Duty Cycle .................................................................................................................... 9 5.2.2 Unit Energy Consumption ................................................................................................ 10 5.3 Efficiency Measures ............................................................................................. 11 5.3.1 Reduce On Mode Power Levels ........................................................................................... 11 5.3.2 Reduce Sleep Mode Power Levels ......................................................................................... 14 5.3.3 Increase Time Spent In Sleep Mode ..................................................................................... 14 5.3.4 Implement New System Architectures ................................................................................... 15 5.4 Standards Case Energy Use Per Product ..................................................................... 16 5.4.1 Primary Standards Criteria ............................................................................................... 16 5.4.2 Secondary Standards Criteria ............................................................................................ 17 5.4.3 Standards Case Unit Energy Consumption ............................................................................. 18 6 MARKET SATURATION & SALES ............................................................................... 19 6.1 Current Market Situation ...................................................................................... 19 6.1.1 Baseline Case ................................................................................................................ 19 6.1.2 High Efficiency Options ................................................................................................... 21 6.2 Future Market Adoption of High Efficiency Options ...................................................... 22 7 SAVINGS POTENTIAL.................................................................................................. 25 7.1 Statewide California Energy Use .............................................................................. 25 7.2 Statewide California Energy Savings .......................................................................... 28 7.3 Other Benefits and Penalties ................................................................................... 29 7.4 State or Local Government Costs and Savings .............................................................. 29 8 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 29 8.1 Incremental Cost ................................................................................................ 29 8.2 Design Life ........................................................................................................ 33 8.3 Lifecycle Cost / Net Benefit ................................................................................... 34 9 ACCEPTANCE ISSUES .................................................................................................. 35 9.1 Infrastructure issues ............................................................................................. 35 9.2 Existing Standards ............................................................................................... 36 9.2.1 ENERGY STAR Program ................................................................................................. 36 9.2.2 U.S. Department of Energy Rulemaking ............................................................................... 36 9.3 Stakeholder Positions ........................................................................................... 37 10 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ...................................................................................... 37 10.1 Hazardous Materials ............................................................................................. 37 10.2 Air Quality ........................................................................................................ 37 10.3 Greenhouse Gases ............................................................................................... 38 11 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 39 11.1 Recommended Standards Proposal ........................................................................... 39 11.2 Proposed Changes to the Title 20 Code Language ......................................................... 39 11.3 Implementation Plan ............................................................................................ 42 12 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 43 APPENDIX A: ADDITIONAL MARKET DATA....................................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B: ENERGY USE AND SAVINGS ANALYSIS USING CHANGING COMPLIANCE RATES OVER TIME .................................................................................................................... 5 APPENDIX C: CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS AND MONETIZATION ......................... C-1 C.1 Criteria Pollutant Emissions Calculation .................................................................... C-1 C.2 Criteria Pollutant Emissions Monetization ................................................................. C-1 APPENDIX D: GREENHOUSE GAS VALUATION DISCUSSION ............................................. D-1 D.1 Damage Cost Approach ........................................................................................ D-1 D.1.1 Interagency Working Group Estimates ................................................................................ D-1 D.2 Abatement Cost Approach .................................................................................... D-2 D.3 Regulated Carbon Market Approach ........................................................................ D-3 D.3.1 European Union Emissions Trading System ......................................................................... D-3 D.3.2 California Cap & Trade ................................................................................................. D-3 1 Executive Summary The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Southern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DSTAC WG3 Report I
    DSTAC WG3 Report I. Introduction A. DSTAC Mission The DSTAC's mission is "to identify, report, and recommend performance objectives, technical capabilities, and technical standards of a not unduly burdensome, uniform, and technology- and platform-neutral software-based downloadable security system" to promote the competitive availability of navigation devices (e.g., set-top boxes and television sets) in furtherance of Section 629 of the Communications Act. The DSTAC must file a report with the Commission by September 4, 2015 to detail findings and recommendations. [DSTAC Mission, www.fcc.gov/dstac] B. DSTAC Scope See Scope of the DSTAC Report, FCC, April 27, 2015 [DSTAC Scope, https://transition.fcc.gov/dstac/fcc-staff-guidance-04272015.docx] C. Working Group 3 Description The working group will identify performance objectives, technical capabilities, and technical standards that relate to the security elements of the downloadable security system. The working group will also identify minimum requirements needed to support the security elements of the downloadable security system. [WG 3 & 4 Descriptions, FCC, April 27, 2015] D. Working Group 3 Product The working group will deliver a written functional description its performance objectives, technical capabilities, and technical standards, and minimum requirements to the full DSTAC. It will present an outline of its work at the May 13, 2015 meeting, a first draft of its report at the July 7, 2015 meeting, and a final report for full DSTAC discussion and consideration at the August 4, 2015 meeting. [WG 3 & 4 Descriptions, FCC, April 27, 2015] 1 | P a g e II. Downloadable Security System - Common Framework A.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Brief
    RVU R Remote User Interface Technology VU Enabling Whole Home DVR For The Consumer Electronics Alliance and Pay TV Industry Technical Brief RVU™ is a client/server-based technology that allows the television content viewer to experience a consistent server-generated user interface, providing support for DVR functionality while watching live 4K RVU TV or recorded programming on various consumer electronics (CE) devices. RVU WIRELESS RVU TV is the basis of the highly successful ROUTER HOME INTERNET DIRECTV™ Genie Whole Home DVR. NETWORK The RVU (pronounced “R-View”) protocol uses DLNA® technology as a foundation. WIRELESS RVU RVU SERVER RVU-compliant TVs and clients are WIRED RVU networked in the home with an RVU server, and once they are connected, the TV viewer can watch live or recorded content on any client in any room. RVU FEATURES OF RVU TECHNOLOGY technology offers support for service • Enables a simple solution for a • Fast development, RVU already provider user interfaces that allow a DVR Whole Home DVR using a single supports 4K content delivery. experience at each client, including user server and standard Consumer Fully independent test and Electronics devices. • interactions such as guide, DVR trick certification path to ensure device play, interactive applications and Video on • Mature specifications developed interoperability and compliance. Demand content. RVU client technology by leading technology companies. can be implemented on a variety of CE devices, from basic thin clients to Smart/ Connected TVs, gaming platforms and BENEFITS OF RVU TECHNOLOGY advanced networked devices. RVU is easily • Accelerates the availability • Expandable specification based expandable and supports new formats like of service provider content on open standards providing 4K Ultra High Definition now.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of the RVU Alliance
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Implementation of Section 304 of the ) CS Docket No. 97-80 Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) Commercial Availability of Navigation ) Devices ) ) Compatibility Between Cable Systems and ) PP Docket No. 00-67 Consumer Electronics Equipment ) Comments of The RVU Alliance The RVU Alliance (www.rvualliance.org) submits these comments on the Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, addressing proposed rules intended to enable additional interfaces on leased cable high-definition set-top boxes as well as more fully specify the functionality of these interfaces.1 About the RVU Alliance The RVU Alliance is an Oregon-based non-profit mutual benefit corporation formed to encourage the rapid, broad and open industry adoption of a specification for the new RVU™ technology including a full-featured “pixel accurate” Remote User Interface (RUI). Founding 1 See Implementation of Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 25 FCC Rcd. 4303 (2010). Promoter members are Broadcom, Cisco, DIRECTV, Samsung and Verizon. Promoter members are ActiveVideo Networks, AppliedMicro, AT&T Labs, Entropic Communications, Humax, JetHead Development, LG Electronics, Morega Systems, Motorola, Pace, Technicolor, Sigma Designs, Solekai Systems, ST Microsystems, Technicolor, Trident Microsystems and Vixs. The RVU standard is complete, with Specification Version 1.0 having been ratified in February 2010, and is publically available (see “RVU Spec Order Form” link at www.rvualliance.org). As both a detailed specification and a comprehensive certification plan are necessary to ensure device interoperability, an RVU certification test tool is currently in development and a formal RVU certification logo program will be in place beginning in November 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulemaking Overview and Preliminary Market and Technology Assessment: Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products
    RULEMAKING OVERVIEW AND PRELIMINARY MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: Set-top Boxes and Network Equipment January 2012 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building Technologies Program Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards Washington, DC 20585 This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy by staff members of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT ................................................................... 1-1 1.2 STRUCTURE OF DOCUMENT .................................................................................... 1-2 1-i LIST OF ACRONYMS ACA American Cable Association APD Auto Power Down CA Conditional Access CEA Consumer Electronics Association CO2 Carbon dioxide DIF Digital Interoperability Forum DOCSIS Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification DOE Department of Energy DSL Digital Subscriber Line DTA Digital Transport Adapter DVR Digital Video Recorder EPA Environmental Protection Agency FCC Federal Communications Commission FM Frequency Modulation HD High Definition HD-DVR High-Definition Digital Video Recorder HEVC High Efficiency Video Coding HomePNA Home Phoneline Networking Alliance IP Internet Protocol IPTV Internet Protocol Television kWh Kilowatt-hours MoCA Multimedia over Coax Alliance MSTV Association for Maximum Service Television NAB National Association of Broadcasters NCTA National Cable and Telecommunications
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Northern
    Case 1:17-cv-00890-ELR Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 1 of 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SONY CORPORATION and SONY ELECTRONICS INC., Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, _______________ v. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ARRIS INTERNATIONAL PLC, ARRIS GROUP, INC., ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC., ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC, ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC., ARRIS GLOBAL LTD., PACE AMERICAS HOLDINGS, INC., PACE AMERICAS, LLC, PACE USA LLC, and PACE AMERICAS INVESTMENTS, LLC Defendants. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiffs Sony Corporation (“Sony Corp.”) and Sony Electronics Inc. (“SEL”) (collectively, “Sony” or “Plaintiffs”) by its undersigned attorneys, hereby files this Complaint against Defendants ARRIS International plc (“ARRIS International”), ARRIS Group, Inc. (“ARRIS Group”), ARRIS Technology, Inc. (“ARRIS Technology”), ARRIS Enterprises LLC (“ARRIS Enterprises”), ARRIS Solutions, Inc. (“ARRIS Solutions”), ARRIS Global Ltd. (“ARRIS Global”) (collectively, “ARRIS” or “ARRIS Defendants”), Pace Americas Holdings, Inc. (“Pace Americas Holdings), Pace Americas, LLC (“Pace Americas”), Pace USA 1 Case 1:17-cv-00890-ELR Document 1 Filed 03/10/17 Page 2 of 58 LLC (“Pace USA”), and Pace Americas Investments, LLC (“Pace Americas Investments”) (collectively, “Pace” or “Pace Defendants”) (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging as follows: NATURE OF THE SUIT 1. This is an action for patent infringement under the United States Patent Statute, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq., arising from Defendants’ infringement of one or more claims of United States Patent Nos. RE45,126 (“the ’126 patent”); 6,467,093 (“the ’093 patent”); 8,032,919 (“the ’919 patent”); 6,556,221 (“the ’221 patent”); and 6,915,525 (“the ’525 patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”) through the use and sale of certain digital cable and satellite products, set-top boxes, and gateways (“Accused Products”).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Assessment for Set-Top Boxes and Network Equipment
    RULEMAKING OVERVIEW AND PRELIMINARY MARKET AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS: Set-top Boxes and Network Equipment December 2011 U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Building Technologies Program Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards Washington, DC 20585 This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy by staff members of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT ................................................................... 1-1 1.2 STRUCTURE OF DOCUMENT .................................................................................... 1-2 1-i LIST OF ACRONYMS ACA American Cable Association APD Auto Power Down CA Conditional Access CEA Consumer Electronics Association CO2 Carbon dioxide DIF Digital Interoperability Forum DOCSIS Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification DOE Department of Energy DSL Digital Subscriber Line DTA Digital Transport Adapter DVR Digital Video Recorder EPA Environmental Protection Agency FCC Federal Communications Commission FM Frequency Modulation HD High Definition HD-DVR High-Definition Digital Video Recorder HEVC High Efficiency Video Coding HomePNA Home Phoneline Networking Alliance IP Internet Protocol IPTV Internet Protocol Television kWh Kilowatt-hours MoCA Multimedia over Coax Alliance MSTV Association for Maximum Service Television NAB National Association of Broadcasters NCTA National Cable and Telecommunications
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of RVU Alliance
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, DC 20554 In the Matters of ) ) International Comparison and Consumer ) GN Docket No. 09-47 Survey Requirements in the Broadband ) Data Improvement Act ) ) A National Broadband Plan for Our Future ) GN Docket No. 09-51, NBP PN #27 ) Inquiry Concerning the Deployment of ) GN Docket No. 09-137 Advanced Telecommunications Capability ) to All Americans in a Reasonable and ) Timely Fashion, and Possible Steps to ) Accelerate Such Deployment Pursuant to ) Section 706 of the Telecommunications ) Act of 1996, as Amended by the ) Broadband Data Improvement Act ) ) Implementation of Section 304 of the ) CS Docket No. 97-80 Telecommunications Act of 1996; ) Commercial Availability of Navigation Devices Comments of RVU Alliance Henry Derovanessian President RVU Alliance. 3855 SW 153rd Drive Beaverton, OR 97006 (503) 619-0578 December 21, 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RVU™ technology allows the television viewer to experience a consistent user interface while watching live or recorded programming on various manufacturer-branded TVs and clients. RVU (pronounced "R-View") uses DLNA as a foundation. RVU-compliant TVs and clients are networked in the home with an RVU server, and once connected, the TV viewer can watch content from any room. RVU technology offers a novel remote user interface that allows user interactions such as guide, trick play and interactive applications—all via a thin client. Created with the input of a mix of service providers, consumer electronics manufacturers and technology companies, the RVU technology is well suited for “gateway” devices that would allow video networks to connect and interact with compatible home video network devices.
    [Show full text]
  • RVU Alliance CONFIDENTIAL
    RVU Protocol Specification RVU Alliance CONFIDENTIAL V1.0 Rev 1.5.1 28 May 2014 RVU Specification Protocol Revision History Revision History Revision Description Date V1.0 Rev 0.9 DIRECTV Contribution to the RVU Alliance. 2009-09-18 DRAFT V1.0 Rev 1.0 1.1.8 – added client/server setup summary 2009-12-03 FINAL 4.2.1, 4.2.2 – added sequencing requirements on single and multiple channels 4.8.2.3.16-1 – add transparent and substitute actions 5.2.1.5, 5.2.1.8, 5.2.1.16, 5.2.1.24 – specify PAUSED_PLAYBACK state on rewind to zero time position 5.6.5, 5.7, 5.8 – removed references to DIRECTV_HD_AC3, DIRECTV_HD_AC3_T 9.2 – made mandatory the client implementation of the Connection Manager actions PrepareForConnection and ConnectionComplete 11.3 Clean up device description XML Misc clarifications, naming, parameter, reference errata removed DIRECTV references where possible V1.0 Rev 1.1 4.5, 4.5-7 – note that the background is always behind the video buffer in the z- 2010-03-31 DRAFT list, which is in turn always behind the display buffer 4.8.1.3, 4.8.2.3.9 – 4.8.2.3.15 – remove references to hardware acceleration 4.8.2.3.17, 4.8.2.3.19 – make SetZList command optional 4.8.2.5 – clarify that output units refer to the output canvas, not the video or display buffer 4.8.2.5.10 – make BlindVideo transparent to background instead of black 5.2.1.5, 5.2.1.8, 5.2.1.16, 5.2.1.24 – specify STOPPED state on rewind to zero time position, also reset absoluteTimePosition to 0, and event LastChange Misc syntax errata, clarifications, references, and table captions throughout Intellectual Property Notice Use of the information contained herein shall be governed solely by the terms and conditions of the RVU Alliance IPR Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Technologies (Net
    Version Date Changes Description V1 6/24/2015 Initial version Initial version V2 6/29/2015 Edited section “Technologies (Network) that enable the Co-editor reception of MVPD or OTT service” to remove Version plus redundancies to WG2 Report #1, Table 1 Section 1 edits on 6/24 edited, comments added to call V3 6/29/2015 Consolidated edits from multiple sources Distributed to WG4 V4 7/1/2015 Added RVU [Zerbe], proposed changes from For call on July CableVision (marked as username PG), Part III Section 1st II, and use cases from V7 document. Accepted formatting changes (all but 2, can’t find 1,other won’t accept) V5 7/1/2015 Removed large scale deletions that duplicated WG2 Edited during July 1 call 1 REPORT OF WORKING GROUP 4 TO DSTAC DRAFT July 7, 2015 Part I: Existing Devices and Technologies Identify the salient differences important to implementation of the non-security elements of a system of such devices based on downloadable security. EXPECTATIONS: SECTION I As most members generally understand the functionality of the devices listed in Part I, it is expected that information would be provided as to how the devices discover and receive content. As content is coming in on different input ports and through different applications running on the devices, the mechanisms for each should be detailed. Various points have been captured in the "Part I section I Table". Part I: Section I. Devices that receive MVPD or OTT service 2 Support Provides Supports Portabl Suppor Supports s Direct Access to Navigatio Suppor e across Supports Supports
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
    UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Matter of ‘ CERTAIN DIGITAL CABLE AND Investigation N0. 337-TA­ SATELLITE PRODUCTS, SET-TOP ’ BOXES, GATEWAYS, AND COMPONENTS THEREOF COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 337 OF THE TARIFF ACT OF 1930. AS AMENDED Complainant: Proposed Respondents: Sony Corporation ARRIS Intemational plc 1-7-1 Konan, Minato-ku 3871 Lakefield Drive Tokyo, 108-0075 Suwanee, GA 30024 Japan Telephone: (678) 473-2000 Telephone: +81-3-6748-211 1 ARRIS Group, Inc. L Sony Electronics Inc. 3871 Lakefield Drive 16530 Via Esprillo Suwanee, GA 30024 San Diego, CA 92127 Telephone: (678)473-2000 United States Telephone: 858-942-2729 ARRIS Technology, Inc. 101 Tournament Drive Counsel for Complainant: Horsham, PA 19044 Lionel M. Lavenue Telephone: 215-323-1000 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP ARRIS Enterprises LLC 3871Lakefield Drive Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Suwanee, GA 30024 Telephone: (678) 473-2000 Reston, VA 20190-5675 p Telephone: (571) 203-2700 ARRIS Solutions, Inc. Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 3871 Lakefield Drive Suwanee, GA 30024 Smith R. Brittingham IV Hala S; Mourad Telephone: (678) 473-2000 Robert D. Wells Forrest A. Jones V‘ ARRIS Global Ltd. (formerly Pace Ltd) Victoria Road, Saltaire FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, West Yorkshire BD18 3LF GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP England 901 New York Avenue, N.W. Telephone: +44 1274 532000 Washington, D.C. 20001-4413 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Pace Americas, LLC Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 3701 FAU Boulevard Suite 200 A Anita Bhushan Boca Raton, FL 33431 Kara Specht Telephone: (561) 995-6000 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Pace Americas Holdings, Inc.
    [Show full text]