Ephemeral Archaeology on the Mountain of the Sorrel Deer, Delta County, Colorado

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ephemeral Archaeology on the Mountain of the Sorrel Deer, Delta County, Colorado United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Colorado EPHEM RAL A CHAEOLOGY ON THE MOUNTAIN OF THE SORREL DEER Steven G. Baker ~UL TURAL RESOURCE SERIES NUMBER 32 EPHEMERAL ARCHAEOLOGY ON THE MOUNTAIN OF THE SORREL DEER, DELTA COUNTY, COLORADO by Steven G. Baker Colorado State Office Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior Denver, Colorado 1991 EPHEMERAL ARCHAEOLOGY ON THE MOUNTAIN OF THE SORREL DEER, DELTA COUNTY, COLORADO by Steven G. Baker Principal Investigator CENTURIES RESEARCH, INC. Montrose, Colorado Originally Prepared for: Colorado Westmoreland, Inc. Paonia, Colorado September 1, 1987 For Submission to: Uncompahgre Resource Area Bureau of Land Management Montrose, Colorado Colorado BLM Antiquities Permit C-4O159c (December 31, 1986) CRI Project No. 382 CWI Contract No. CE-86-258 COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE AVAILABLE FROM: Colorado State Office Bureau of Land Management 2850 Youngfield Street Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7076 or Montrose District Office Bureau of Land Management 2465 South Townsend Avenue Montrose, Colorado 81401 THIS DOCUMENT IS IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN AND MAY BE QUOTED. IF PORTIONS OF THIS WORK ARE USED, PLEASE CREDIT EITHER THE AUTHOR(S) AND/OR THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT. Cover Photo: The Grand Mesa 1ooki ng north across the Gunnison River Bottoms, near Delta, Colorado. The Spanish explorers of the 18th Century referred to Grand Mesa as La Sierra del Venado Alazan or The Mountain of the Sorrel Deer or Elk. Photo courtesy of Ben Walker, Delta, Colorado. Series Production: Frederic J. Athearn FOREWORD Small, nondescript, ephemeral archaeological sites are often ignored, surficially examined, and judged insignificant based upon a paucity of surface evidence. "Ephemeral Archaeology on the Mountain of the Sorrel Deer, Delta County, Colorado", authored by Steven G. Baker, clearly demonstrates how such sites, if appropriately addressed, can be important in providing crucial information to regional prehistory. In recent years the professional community has come to realize that the so-called proverbial "lithic scatter" can be extremely important and upon closer scrutiny can often provide valuable cultural and chronological information. These sites should not be just written off. The Bureau of Land Management operates under a policy of avoiding all sites when possible, even those sites perceived as insignificant. This monograph is the culmination of ten years of study and cooperative teamwork between Colorado Westmoreland Inc. and their affiliated Orchard Valley Coal Mine, the Bureau of Land Management, and State Historic Preservation Office. This study culminated in the excavation of two sites. The Ridge Site (5DTI71), a presumed game drive and kill locality, is considered a late Archaic or early Formative Stage site and is notable for the lithic assemblage associated with butchering. Excavations at The Roatcap Game Trail site (5DT271) included a Ute component consisting of a hearth and butchering area, a Formative Stage brush structure and hearth, and a possible transitional Archaic/Formative Stage component consisting of a use area with milling stones and hearth. This monograph should prove to be a valuable resource in further studies in the region and Baker is commended for recognizing the value of the seemingly unimportant lithic scatter. Richard E. Fike Bureau of Land Management Montrose District Dedication This volume is very humbly dedicated to the memories of my friends J. S. (Steve) Sigstad (1939-1989) and Ronald J. (Ron) Schmitt (1937-1981) of the U.S. Forest Service. Steve served as Regional Archaeologist for the Rocky Mountain Region of the USDA Forest Service from 1976 until his death in 1989. Ron was Recreation Staff Officer on the Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests from 1974 to 1977 and was in charge of managing cultural resources prior to the time when the forests obtained their own professional archaeological staff. My own early archaeological work in Western Colorado brought me into a close working relationship with these two men and my first local commercial efforts were conducted under their sponsorship. Although these gentlemen both crossed over the Great Divide on an early and untimely schedule, they left behind them a legacy of congeniality, professionalism and dedication in promoting the conservation of Western Colorado's archaeological resources, including those of the Grand Mesa. Together, these two men did much to shape the cultural resource management profession in Colorado and with it, the livelihoods of many of today's practicing archaeologists. This was not always a comfortable or popular mission for these gentlemen. We should all be grateful to them. Steve Baker Montrose, Colorado July, 1991 Steve Sigstad Ron Schmitt (1939-1989) (1937-1981) EPHEMERAL ARCHAEOLOGY ON THE MOUNTAIN OF THE SORREL DEER, DELTA COUNTY, COLORADO ABSTRACT By Steven G. Baker CENTURIES RESEARCH, INC. Ten years of intermittent cultural resource studies on behalf of Colorado Westmoreland Inc. 1 s Orchard Valley Mine are summarized in this volume. The total study area encompasses approximately 15,000 acres of rugged topography above the North Fork of the Gunnison River on the southeast flank of Grand Mesa in West-Central Colorado. This is adjacent to the route traveled by Escalante in 1776 when he reported on Sabuagana Utes as he ascended La Sierra del Venado Alazan (The Mountain of the Roan or Sorrel Deer), now known as Grand Mesa. The study area is focused on a wide zone of oakbrush on the ecotone between the Transitional and Montane zones of the mesa. The prehistoric settlement system on this ecotone appears to have consisted of seasonal individual family households. These clustered along game trails near water, apparently at the margins of this broad band of oakbrush. The ten year study program resulted in the recording of 10 aboriginal sites and 9 isolated finds as well as a quantity of historic Euro-American resources reported on elsewhere. In addition, 1986 witnessed excavation programs at two sites. The first was The Ridge Site (5DT771), an undated game drive and kill point. This component proved notable only in its presence and in the lithic assemblage from the butchering location. This assemblage consisted mostly of small utilized flakes. Excavations at The Roatcap Game Trai 1 site (5DT271) were substantial and isolated three spatially and stratigraphically discrete aboriginal components. The first, Component 1, was the most productive and consisted of the remains of a historic Ute household. This yielded the probable remains of an oak brush shelter along with a slab- lined hearth surrounded by discrete butchering areas where parts of nine or more elk, deer and bison were processed. The component is believed to represent a limited seasonal occupation by a walking Sabuagana Ute household which was participating, as part of a deme cluster, in procurement activities which included an emphasis on hunting. The faunal assemblage evidences a consistent pattern of meat distribution that is thought to have been kinship-based. The component I s living surface lay just beneath the sod and a comprehensive assemblage of utilized flake and other butchering tools from the female activity kit was recovered from this surface along with other tools related to food processing and acquisition. These included Uncompahgre Brownware pottery and a Desert Side-Notched projectile point. Radiocarbon dating and dendrochronology bracketed this occupation within the later 18th and early 19th Centuries. The assemblage is notable because of its preservation, comprehensiveness, purity of functional and apparent ethnic association, and its placement within a suggested chronology of local historic Ute culture change. This late summer/fall occupation is vii believed to be a wickiup-focused seasonal residential base from late in the Early Contact Period prior to extensive disruption of the contact/traditional culture system. Such disruptions were ushered in during the Utes' Phase of Conflict and Competition which became most serious in this region in the 19th Century. Component 2 contained the floor of a Formative Stage brush structure with a central fire hearth. It yielded a limited assemblage of heat-treated stone tools including a small, ovoid, corner-notched arrow point along with small, ovoid preforms presumably intended for production of similar points. A radiocarbon date of A.O. 760 ± 60 places this occupation squarely within the generalized BMIII Period, late within Irwin-Williams' Oshara Tradition, or within the Sagehen Phase of the Dolores chronology. At the local level, the occupation falls within Buckles' postulated Ironstone and Dry Creek Phases of the Uncompahgre Complex. The most likely associations for this component are believed to be with the still controversial 11 hogan builders 11 described by the Huschers, the Weimer Ranch site occupants in the San Miguel drainage, and perhaps with the Turner Look site occupants in Utah. It now appears that there may be some continuity in projectile point styles and the use of sma 11, ovoid preforms among these assemblages. Component 2 is believed to be a seasonal residential base and is cautiously assigned a Formative Stage 11 Fremont- l i ke 11 affiliation. Component 3 was an eroded 1i vi ng area focused about two mi 11 i ng stones and a hearth filled with fire-cracked rock. The site elements and artifact assemblage seem to have close parallels with the En Media and Trujillo Phases of the Oshara Tradition. The component yielded a poor radiocarbon date of A.O. 10 ± 410 which most likely places it at the interface of the Archaic and Formative Stages. The component is notable in its conformity to generalized early Basketmaker components as best synthesized by Irwin-Williams. Obsidian from the component derives from Cochiti on the Rio Grande in Southern New Mexico. Other elements in the lithic assemblage may also be exotic to the local area. A regional floresence in trading networks during the late Archaic is suspected in the lithics from this component but this is not demonstrated.
Recommended publications
  • Ancient Pueblitos of the Sandia Foothills
    ANCIENT PUEBLITOS OF THE SANDIA FOOTHILLS By Hayward H. Franklin Maxwell Museum Technical Series No. 36 Maxwell Museum of Anthropology MSC01, 1050, 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001 maxwellmuseum.unm.edu 2021 Copyright 2021, Maxwell Museum of Anthropology University of New Mexico TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 The Foothills Environment.................................................................................................. 2 Overview of Culture History............................................................................................... 4 Previous Studies................................................................................................................... 7 Methods................................................................................................................................9 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 11 Site Inventory..................................................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • Moose Management Plan DAU
    MOOSE MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT M-5 Grand Mesa and Crystal River Valley Photo courtesy of Phil & Carol Nesius Prepared by Stephanie Duckett Colorado Division of Wildlife 711 Independent Ave. Grand Junction, CO 81505 M-5 DATA ANALYSIS UNIT PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GMUs: 41, 42, 43, 411, 421, 52, and 521 (Grand Mesa and Crystal River Valley) Land Ownership: 35% private; 65% public Post-hunt population: Previous objective: NA 2008 estimate: 125 Recommended: pending Composition Objective: Previous objective: NA 2008 estimate: 60 bulls: 100 cows Recommended: pending Background: The M-5 moose herd was established with translocated Shiras moose from Utah and Colorado in 2005 – 2007. The herd has exhibited strong reproduction and has pioneered into suitable habitat in the DAU. At this time, it is anticipated that there are approximately 125 moose in the DAU. The herd already provides significant watchable wildlife opportunities throughout the Grand Mesa and Crystal River Valley areas and it is anticipated that it will provide hunting opportunities in the near future. Significant Issues: Several significant issues were identified during the DAU planning process in M-5. The majority of people who provided input indicated strong interest in both hunting and watchable wildlife opportunities. There was less, but still significant, concern about both competition with livestock for forage and the possibility of habitat degradation, primarily in willow and riparian zones. The majority of stakeholders favored increasing the population significantly while staying below carrying capacity. There was strong support for providing a balance of opportunity and trophy antlered hunting in this DAU, and most respondents indicated a desire for quality animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8np7g12w Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 11(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors Wilke, Philip J. Schroth, Adella B. Publication Date 1989-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 146-174 (1989). Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California PHILIP J. WILKE and ADELLA B. SCHROTH, Dept. of Anthropology, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521. A HIS paper discusses lithic raw material THEORETICAL BACKGROUND prospects (or simply "prospects"), places where potentially flakeable tool stone was Acquisition of tool stone by aboriginal assayed or tested for quality. It characterizes peoples was an industry that in terms of scale this site type and contrasts it with quarries, varied greatly from one situation to another. places where stone was obtained consistently The large and well-known quarries of the and in quantity, and places where stone was western United States represent one end of picked up, used, and discarded with little the spectrum. These include the AUbates modification. We believe prospects represent silicified dolomite quarries, Texas; Spanish a major archaeological site type that has re­ Diggings quartzite quarries, Wyoming; ceived inadequate attention in the literature. Tosawihi opalite quarries, Nevada; and Casa We describe here a prospect site (CA- Diablo and Coso obsidian quarries, California, SBr-5872), characterize its assemblage, and to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Human Head PDF Book
    THE EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN HEAD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Daniel E. Lieberman | 768 pages | 04 Jan 2011 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780674046368 | English | Cambridge, Mass., United States The Evolution of the Human Head PDF Book Back in his office in the Peabody Museum, Lieberman uses comparative morphology and modeling to complement the biomechanical research. Want to Read saving…. He conducted pioneering functional morphological This species also may have used fire to cook meat. The individuals show signs of having been deliberately disposed of within the cave near the time of death. With larger populations, social and technological innovations were easier to fix in human populations, which may have all contributed to the fact that modern Homo sapiens replaced the Neanderthal populations by 28, BP. Roberts, Alice M. Average rating 3. The author integrates material from anatomy, physiology, physics, biomechanics, molecular and developmental biology, but brings all under the umbrella of evolutionary theory. The oldest known tools are flakes from West Turkana, Kenya, which date to 3. Evolutionary Biology. Here she suggests some recent and forthcoming books she finds informative and fascinating. It also suggests that humans had larger trade catchment areas than Neanderthals confirmed in the distribution of stone tools. An excellent read to expand on The Origin of the Species. Main article: Homo floresiensis. The Complete World of Human Evolution. Empire's Twilight: Northeast Asia under the Mongols. He originally named the material Anthropopithecus erectus —, considered at this point as a chimpanzee-like fossil primate and Pithecanthropus erectus —, changing his mind as of based on its morphology, which he considered to be intermediate between that of humans and apes.
    [Show full text]
  • La Junta, Colorado Contents
    33rd Annual Meeting of The Colorado Council of Professional Archaeologists March 24—27, 2011 Otero Junior College La Junta, Colorado Contents Acknowledgements..................................................................................2 General.Information.................................................................................4 Summary.Schedule..................................................................................5 Banquet.Speaker......................................................................................6 Picket.Wire.Canyonlands.Field.Trip........................................................7 Annual.Business.Meeting.Agenda...........................................................8 Presentation.Schedule............................................................................10 Symposium.Abstracts............................................................................14 Paper.and.Poster.Abstracts.....................................................................15 Ward.F..Weakly.Memorial.Fund............................................................35 Ward.F..Weakly.Memorial.Fund.Awardees............................................36 Native.American.Scholarship.and.Awardees.........................................38 CCPA.Fellows........................................................................................39 2010-2011.Executive.Committee...........................................................40 Past.CCPA.Meeting.Locations...............................................................41
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Ising the Ba R
    12 Ra ising the Ba r Lithic Analysis and Archaeological Research in the Southeast William Andrefsky Jr. When I was asked to provide comments on the collection of lithic analysis pa- pers presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference (included within this volume), I did not realize the extent to which lithic tools and debitage had been overlooked in the region as a medium for interpreting past aboriginal practices and behaviors. According to the session abstract, the goal of the lithic symposium and this volume is to highlight contemporary methods and theory in lithic analysis to encourage researchers in the Southeast to integrate lithic data into their site interpretations. After a quick perusal of the literature for the region, it was apparent that very few Southeast lithics-related publications have appeared in the national peer-reviewed literature (Daniel2001; Shott and Ballenger 2007); slightly more lithic research occurs in regional journal venues (Carr and Bradbury 2000; Franklin and Simek 2008; Peacock 2004); and other contributions are found in edited volumes not necessarily focused specifically on lithics in the region (Anderson and Sassaman 1996; Carr 1994a; Henry and Odell1989; Johnson and Morrow 1987). Similar to the case of Mesoamerica and the American Southwest, there is a relatively low proportion of lithics- based research relative to ceramics and architecture. Such a trend comes as a surprise to me. However, I have been hooked on stone tool technology since the sixth grade when I first began looking at Louis Leakey's Oldowan pebble tools and wondering whether the broken cobbles in my local creek could have been made by Australopithecus.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Natural Areas Program 2018- 2020 Review
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Colorado Natural Areas Program 2018- 2020 Review Triennial Report to Governor Polis 1 Pagosa skyrocket cpw.state.co.us Colorado Natural Areas Program Showcasing & protecting our state’s natural treasures since 1977 The Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) is a statewide conservation program created in 1977 by the Colorado Natural Areas Act (C.R.S. 33-33). The Program is housed within Colorado Parks and Mission: Wildlife (CPW) and is advised by the Colorado Natural Areas Council To identity, evaluate, and protect specific examples of (CNAC), a seven member Governor appointed board. Program natural features and phenomena as enduring resources staff includes one full-time coordinator and one to two seasonal for present and future generations, through a statewide technicians. CNAP’s small base is supported by a contract botanist system of Designated Natural Areas. [C.R.S 33-33-102] and over 50 dedicated volunteer stewards. Table of Contents CNAP Background ......................................................................................2 Natural Features .........................................................................................3 t Natural Areas Council ...............................................................................4 Volunteer Steward Program ....................................................................5 Rare Plant Conservation ...........................................................................6 3 Year Program Highlights .......................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES U.S. 84 SUNSHINE VALLEY: THE TESTING OF THREE SITES SOUTHEAST OF SANTA ROSA, NEW MEXICO by Peter Y. Bullock Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 176 SANTA FE 1997 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Between October 30 and November 10, 1994, the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted limited archaeological testing atthree sites on U.S. 84 southeast of Santa Rosa, Guadalupe County, New Mexico. Limited testing at LA 105817, LA 57152, and LA 103315 was conducted at the request of the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD), to determine the extent and importance of cultural resources present as partof the proposed improvements alonga 12.8-km (8 miles) stretch of U.S. 84 southeast of Sank Rosa, New Mexico (Levine 1994). LA 103315 is on private and NMSHTD- aquired land. The other two sites (LA105817 and LA 57152) are on State Trust Land. All three sites are surface lithic artifact scatters, and probably represent temporary or seasonal camping locations.No intact features were foundon any of the sites associated with site occupation or use. In all three cases the data potentialof the portions of the sites within theproject area was determined to be minimal beyond that already documented, and no further investigations are recommended. MNM Project 41.589 NMSHTD Project No. NH-084-1(10)18 CPRC Archaeological Survey Permit No. SP-146 New Mexico State Land Office Survey Permit No.931027 CN 2355 J00040 ii CONTENTS Administrative Summary ............................................. ii Introduction ..................................................... 1 Environment ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW DRAFT #2 Colorado National Monument Sally Mcbeth February 26, 2010
    ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW DRAFT #2 Colorado National Monument Sally McBeth February 26, 2010 written in consultation with the Northern Ute ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW DRAFT #2 Colorado National Monument Sally McBeth February 26, 2010 written in consultation with the Northern Ute Submitted to the National Park Service Cooperative Agreement # H1200040001 (phases I and II) and H1200090004 (phase III) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The generosity of many Ute friends, whose willingness to share their stories, remembrances, and recollections with me cannot go unacknowledged. I treasure their rich and profound understandings of ancestral landscape shared with me over the past three years. These friends include, but are not limited to Northern Ute tribal members (alphabetically): Loya Arrum, Betsy Chapoose, Clifford Duncan, Kessley LaRose, Roland McCook, Venita Taveapont, and Helen Wash. Their advice and suggestions on the writing of this final report were invaluable. Special thanks are due to Hank Schoch—without whose help I really would not have been able to complete (or even start) this project. His unflagging generosity in introducing me to the refulgent beauty and cultural complexity of Colorado National Monument cannot ever be adequately acknowledged. I treasure the memories of our hikes and ensuing discussions on politics, religion, and life. The critical readings by my friends and colleagues, Sally Crum (USFS), Dave Fishell (Museum of the West), Dave Price (NPS), Hank Schoch (NPS-COLM), Alan McBeth, and Mark Stevens were very valuable. Likewise the advice and comments of federal-level NPS staff Cyd Martin, Dave Ruppert, and especially Tara Travis were invaluable. Thanks, all of you. Former Colorado National Monument Superintendant Bruce Noble and Superintendant Joan Anzelmo provided tremendous support throughout the duration of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Grinding Stone Reuse 1983
    The Effects of Grinding Stone Reuse on the Archaeological Record in the Eastern Great Basin Author(s): STEVEN R. SIMMS Source: Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, Vol. 5, No. 1/2 (Summer and Winter 1983), pp. 98-102 Published by: Malki Museum, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27825137 Accessed: 30-11-2015 18:41 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Malki Museum, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.123.24.42 on Mon, 30 Nov 2015 18:41:26 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 5, Nos. 1 and 2, pp. 98-102 (1983). The Effects of Grinding Stone on Reuse the Archaeological Record in the Eastern Great Basin STEVEN R. SIMMS are aware thatmany hunter-gatherer societies where the transpor ARCHAEOLOGISTSfactors change archaeological sites after tation of material culture is a limiting factor. they have been initially deposited. One kind Reuse can include the use of grinding stones of post-depositional phenomena that could from nearby, older sites or the caching of change the material record is the scavenging previously used grinding stones.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Peck Sink Storm Water Park Design Project Area in Hernando County, Florida
    CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT SURVEY OF THE PECK SINK STORM WATER PARK DESIGN PROJECT AREA IN HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared for: Hernando County Board of County Commissioners 20 North Main Street Brooksville, Florida 34601 By: Archaeological Consultants, Inc. 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, Florida 34240 Joan Deming - Project Manager Elizabeth A. Horvath and Lee Hutchinson - Project Archaeologists Justin Winkler and Nelson Rodriguez - Archaeologists In Association with: King Engineering Associates, Inc. 4921 Memorial Highway, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33634 September 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI) conducted a cultural resource assessment survey (CRAS) of the approximately 111-acre Peck Sink Storm Water Park Design project area (hereinafter referred to as Peck Sink) in Hernando County, Florida in June and July 2009. The purpose of this survey was to locate and identify any cultural resources within the project area, and to assess their significance in terms of eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). This survey was conducted for the Hernando County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), and complies with Hernando County’s Comprehensive Plan (effective February 2006). This report also complies with Chapters 267 and 373, Florida Statutes (FS), Florida’s Coastal Management Program, and implementing state regulations regarding possible impact to significant historical properties. This report conforms to the specifications set forth in Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code (FAC) (revised August 21, 2002) and the Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (Florida Division of Historical Resources [FDHR] 2003). Background research and a review of the Florida Master Site File (FMSF) and NRHP indicated that no archaeological sites have been recorded previously within the Peck Sink property.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]