DOCSLIB.ORG

North Rona Special Area of Conservation Advice Under

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Rona Special Area of Conservation Advice Under North Rona Special Area of Conservation Advice under Regulation 33(2) of The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as amended) 30 March 2006 Regulation 33(2): North Rona SAC SNH About this Package: Section 1 of this document provides a general introduction and Sections 2 and 3 fulfil Scottish Natural Heritage's duties under Regulation 33(2) of The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (Habitats Regulations) (as amended by The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004). This requires that SNH advises other relevant authorities as to the conservation objectives of the site (see Section 2) and any operations which may cause deterioration of natural habitats or the habitats of species, or disturbance of species, in so far as such disturbance could be significant, for which the site has been designated (see Section 3). Annexes A and B provide supplementary, non-statutory information. Annex A gives information on the sensitivity and vulnerability of the marine qualifying interests: ‘Grey seals Halichoerus grypus’, ‘Reefs’ and ‘Submerged or partially submerged sea caves’. Annex B gives some indication as to the extent, distribution, structure, function and processes that affect the qualifying interests. It should be noted that this is indicative and not definitive, and as more site information is gathered these sections may be updated. North Rona was designated by Scottish Ministers as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) on 17th March 2005. This site is also referred to as a ‘European site’ (Regulation 10(1)). A ‘European marine site’ is a ‘European site’ which is wholly or in part marine (Regulation 2(1)) and is hereafter referred to as a marine SAC. Although the following statutory information is for the benefit of relevant authorities (see below for explanation of their role), it can also be used by other competent authorities when assessing plans or projects. 30 March 2006 1 Regulation 33(2): North Rona SAC SNH 1 Introduction 1.1 Background The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as amended by The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004), commonly referred to as the Habitats Regulations, transpose the EC Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora (Habitats Directive) into domestic legislation. Regulation 33(2) gives Scottish Natural Heritage a statutory responsibility to advise other relevant authorities as to the conservation objectives for marine SACs in Scotland, and any operations which may cause deterioration of natural habitats or the habitats of species, or disturbance of species for which the site has been designated. This document presents the Regulation 33 advice, plus supporting information, for the North Rona SAC to assist relevant and competent authorities, local interest groups and individuals in considering management of the site. This advice, plus supporting information, will also help to determine the scope and nature of any “appropriate assessment”, which the Habitats Directive requires to be undertaken for proposed plans and projects that are not connected to the conservation management of the site and are considered likely to have a significant effect. Where necessary Scottish Natural Heritage will also provide more detailed advice to relevant, and other competent, authorities to inform assessment of the implications of any such plans or projects. 1.2 Relevant and competent authorities Within the context of a marine SAC, a relevant authority is a body or authority that has a function in relation to land or waters within or adjacent to the site (Regulation 5) and include: a nature conservation body; a local authority; water undertakers; a navigation authority; a harbour authority; a lighthouse authority; a river purification board (SEPA); a district salmon fishery board; and a local fisheries committee. All relevant authorities are competent authorities. A competent authority is defined in Regulation 6 as “any Minister, government department, public or statutory undertaker, public body of any description or person holding a public office”. In the context of a plan or project, the competent authority is the authority with the power or duty to determine whether or not the proposal can proceed. 1.3 The role of relevant authorities The Habitats Regulations require relevant authorities to exercise their functions so as to secure compliance with the Habitats Directive. A management scheme may be drawn up for each marine SAC by the relevant authorities as described under Regulation 34. For marine SACs with overlapping interests, a single management scheme may be developed. Where a management scheme is in place the relevant authorities must ensure that all plans for the area integrate with it. Such plans may include shoreline 30 March 2006 2 Regulation 33(2): North Rona SAC SNH management plans, Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) management plans, local Biodiversity Action Plans (BAPs) and sustainable development strategies for estuaries. This must occur to ensure that only a single management scheme is produced through which all relevant authorities exercise their duties under the Habitats Regulations. 1.4 Responsibilities under other conservation designations Other designations within or adjacent to the North Rona marine SAC are: Rona and Sula Sgeir National Nature Reserve; North Rona and Sula Sgeir Special Protection Area; North Rona and Sula Sgeir SSSI. The obligations of relevant, and other competent authorities and organisations under such designations and legislation are not affected by the advice contained in this document. 1.5 Conservation objectives Section 2 of this document contains the conservation objectives for the marine components of the North Rona SAC, a site which consists of both marine and terrestrial qualifying interests. The conservation objectives have been developed to ensure that the obligations of the Habitats Directive are met. 1.6 Advice as to operations The operations, set out in Section 3, are those which SNH advise may cause deterioration of natural habitats or the habitats of species, or disturbance of species, for which the site has been designated. This does not necessarily mean that the operations are presently ongoing or, if they are, that they are at levels incompatible with the conservation objectives. 1.7 Plans and projects The Habitats Regulations require that, where an authority concludes that a development proposal is unconnected with the nature conservation management of a Natura site and is likely to have a significant effect on that site, it must undertake an appropriate assessment of the implications for the qualifying interest for which the area has been designated. 1.8 Review of Consents Competent authorities are required by the Habitats Regulations to undertake a review of all consents and permissions for activities affecting the site as soon as reasonably practicable after it becomes a European site. This will have implications for discharge and other consents, which will need to be reviewed in the light of the conservation objectives. 30 March 2006 3 Regulation 33(2): North Rona SAC SNH 2 Statutory advice given by SNH under Regulation 33(2) Conservation Objectives 2.1 Introduction This section provides conservation objectives, which have been developed by SNH in agreement with the Scottish Executive and are to be provided to the relevant authorities in fulfilment of the requirements under Regulation 33(2) of The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 (as amended by The Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004). The conservation objectives ensure that the obligations of the Habitats Directive are met; that is, there should not be deterioration or significant disturbance of the qualifying interest. This will also ensure that the integrity of the site is maintained and that it makes a full contribution to achieving favourable conservation status for its qualifying interests. The North Rona marine SAC has been designated for the species ‘Grey seal Halichoerus grypus’, which is listed on Annex II of the Habitats Directive, as well as for the Annex I habitats ‘Reefs’ and ‘Submerged or partially submerged sea caves’. North Rona SAC also consists of a marine terrestrial qualifying interest, which is listed below the conservation objectives (see the SNH website www.snh.org.uk for more information). 30 March 2006 4 Regulation 33(2): North Rona SAC SNH The conservation objectives for the marine qualifying interests of the North Rona SAC are as follows: To avoid deterioration of the habitats of qualifying species (Grey seal Halichoerus grypus) or significant disturbance to the qualifying species, thus ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained and the site makes an appropriate contribution to achieving favourable conservation status for the qualifying interest. To ensure for the qualifying species that the following are maintained in the long term: • Population of the species as a viable component of the site • Distribution of the species within site • Distribution and extent of habitats supporting the species • Structure, function and supporting processes of habitats supporting the species • No significant disturbance of the species To avoid deterioration of the qualifying habitats (Reefs and Submerged or partially submerged sea caves) thus ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained and the site makes an appropriate contribution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerial Survey of Northern Gannet (Morus Bassanus) Colonies Off NW Scotland 2013
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 696 Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 696 Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013 For further information on this report please contact: Andy Douse Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Wanless, S., Murray, S. & Harris, M.P. 2015. Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 696. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Aerial survey of northern gannet (Morus bassanus) colonies off NW Scotland 2013 Commissioned Report No. 696 Project No: 14641 Contractor: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Northern gannet; Sula Sgeir; St Kilda; Flannan Islands; Sule Stack: Sule Skerry; gugas; population trends. Background Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) commissioned an aerial survey of selected colonies of northern gannets (Morus bassanus) off the NW coast of Scotland in 2013. The principal aim was to assess the status of the population in this region, which holds some important, but infrequently counted colonies (St Kilda, Sula Sgeir, Sule Stack, Flannan Islands and Sule Skerry). In addition, an up-to-date assessment was required to review the basis for the licensed taking of young gannets (gugas) from the island of Sula Main findings Aerial surveys of all five colonies were successfully carried out on 18 and 19 June 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Birds
    SB 30(2) COV 27/5/10 10:55 Page 1 The pair of Ptarmigan were roosting either side of a PhotoSP T boulder, and observing them for a while, they didn’t Plate 155. On a wintery day© in March 2010 I drove move. I decided to move a little bit closer to try and to the Cairngorms to record any birds I might see. capture a picture and I did this every five minutes or SCOTTISH There was snow at 1000 feet, and the mountain I so until I got to a decent distance for the 400 mm decided to climb was not far from thousands of lens. The picture I believe gives a real feeling to the skiers. I encountered Red Grouse at 1500 feet and extreme habitat in which Ptarmigan exist. I backed just a little bit higher at c. 2000 feet I came across off and left them to roost in peace. my first Ptarmigan. There was also a pair slightly BIRDS higher at c. 2900 feet. For people who are interested in camera gear, I used a Canon 40D, 400 mm lens and a Bushawk On my climb I also found foot prints of Mountain shoulder mount. Volume 30 (2) 30 (2) Volume Hare and more grouse. I’m sure the Ptarmigan had been forced lower down the hill to feed, as there John Chapman was so much snow cover and on the tops it must (www.johnchapmanphotographer.co.uk) have been -15°C the night before. Scottish Birds June 2010 published by the SCOTTISH ORNITHOLOGISTS’ CLUB Featuring the best images posted on the SOC website each quarter, PhotoSpot will present stunning portraits as well as record shots of something unique, accompanied by the story behind the photograph and the equipment used.
    [Show full text]
  • S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It
    3 S. S. N. S. Norse and Gaelic Coastal Terminology in the Western Isles It is probably true to say that the most enduring aspect of Norse place-names in the Hebrides, if we expect settlement names, has been the toponymy of the sea coast. This is perhaps not surprising, when we consider the importance of the sea and the seashore in the economy of the islands throughout history. The interplay of agriculture and fishing has contributed in no small measure to the great variety of toponymic terms which are to be found in the islands. Moreover, the broken nature of the island coasts, and the variety of scenery which they afford, have ensured the survival of a great number of coastal terms, both in Gaelic and Norse. The purpose of this paper, then, is to examine these terms with a Norse content in the hope of assessing the importance of the two languages in the various islands concerned. The distribution of Norse names in the Hebrides has already attracted scholars like Oftedal and Nicolaisen, who have concen­ trated on establis'hed settlement names, such as the village names of Lewis (OftedaI1954) and the major Norse settlement elements (Nicolaisen, S.H.R. 1969). These studies, however, have limited themselves to settlement names, although both would recognise that the less important names also merit study in an intensive way. The field-work done by the Scottish Place Name Survey, and localised studies like those done by MacAulay (TGSI, 1972) have gone some way to rectifying this omission, but the amount of material available is enormous, and it may be some years yet before it is assembled in a form which can be of use to scholar­ ship.
    [Show full text]
  • 5.2.1 Kyle Rhea Data the Telemetry Data from the Kyle Rhea Study
    TITLE: DATA REQUEST ISLE OF SKYE DATE: NOVEMBER 2016 REPORT CODE: SMRUC-JAC-2016-015 Figure 15 Telemetry tracks from the 13 harbour seals tagged at Loch Bay and Loch Dunvegan within the Ascrib, Isay and Dunvegan SAC in 2004 and 2005. 5.2.1 Kyle Rhea data The telemetry data from the Kyle Rhea study shows a very high density of tracks moving through and/or foraging within the channel between Skye and mainland Scotland (Figure 16). In total, 93.4% of all the GPS positions obtained from these nine seals were inside the Study Area. Only two seals left the Study Area for a significant portion of their time. Seal pv43-394-12 recorded 75% of its GPS positions inside the Study Area; for the remaining 25% of the time it travelled south out of the narrows at Kyle Rhea and west to off the south east coast of South Uist (Figure 16). Seal pv43-350-12 recorded 50% of its GPS positions inside the Study Area; for the remaining 50% of the time it travelled north out of the Study Area directly to the Butt of Lewis (Figure 16). Of these nine tagged seals, six left the narrows at Kyle Rhea at travelled north and west round the coast of Skye past the Project Site (Figure 16). One seal (pv43-376-12) moved along the coast of Skye, directly past the jetty construction site, with GPS location positions only 90 m from the construction site (Figure 17). These data show that there is clear connectivity between the Project 31 TITLE: DATA REQUEST ISLE OF SKYE DATE: NOVEMBER 2016 REPORT CODE: SMRUC-JAC-2016-015 construction site and the harbour seal haul out in Kyle Rhea.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Lighthouse Fund 2003-2004 HC
    CONTENTS Foreword to the accounts 1 Performance Indicators for the General Lighthouse Authorities 7 Constitutions of the General Lighthouse Authorities and their board members 10 Statement of the responsibilities of the General Lighthouse Authorities’ boards, Secretary of State for Transport and the Accounting Officer 13 Statement of Internal control 14 Certificate of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the Houses of Parliament 16 Income and expenditure account 18 Balance sheet 19 Cash flow statement 20 Notes to the accounts 22 Five year summary 40 Appendix 1 41 Appendix 2 44 iii FOREWORD TO THE ACCOUNTS for the year ended 31 March 2004 The report and accounts of the General Lighthouse Fund (the Fund) are prepared pursuant to Section 211(5) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995. Accounting for the Fund The Companies Act 1985 does not apply to all public bodies but the principles that underlie the Act’s accounting and disclosure requirements are of general application: their purpose is to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the body concerned. The Government therefore has decided that the accounts of public bodies should be prepared in a way that conforms as closely as possible with the Act’s requirements and also complies with Accounting Standards where applicable. The accounts are prepared in accordance with accounts directions issued by the Secretary of State for Transport. The Fund’s accounts consolidate the General Lighthouse Authorities’ (GLAs) accounts and comply as appropriate with this policy. The notes to the Bishop Rock Lighthouse accounts contain further information. Section 211(5) of the Merchant Shipping Act 1995 requires the Secretary of State to lay the Fund’s accounts before Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Existing Protected Areas of Identification of Remaining MPA Search Features Priorities Pdf, 1.40MB
    FINAL REPORT Contribution of existing protected areas to the MPA network and identification of remaining MPA search feature priorities For further information on this report please contact: Morven Carruthers Oliver Crawford-Avis Scottish Natural Heritage Joint Nature Conservation Committee Great Glen House Inverdee House Leachkin Road Baxter Street Inverness, IV3 8NW Aberdeen, AB11 9QA Telephone: 01463 725 018 Telephone: 01224 266587 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Carruthers, M., Chaniotis, P.D., Clark, L., Crawford-Avis, O., Gillham, K., Linwood, M., Oates, J., Steel, L., and Wilson, E. 2011. Contribution of existing protected areas to the MPA network and identification of remaining MPA search feature priorities. Internal report produced by Scottish Natural Heritage, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and Marine Scotland for the Scottish Marine Protected Areas Project. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. This report was produced as part of the Scottish MPA Project and the views expressed by the author(s) should not be taken as the views and policies of the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Scottish Natural Heritage or Scottish Ministers. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Detailed assessments were completed for each of the MPA search features, based on the data available in GeMS1. These were used as a basis to assess the extent to which MPA search features are represented within the existing network of protected areas. 130 protected areas (including marine SACs, SPA extensions, SSSIs with maritime components, and fisheries areas established for nature conservation purposes) were included in the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening for Likely Significant Effects
    Argyll Array Offshore Wind Farm: Habitat Regulations Assessment – Screening for Likely Significant Effects 14 May 2014 Project Number: SGP6346 RPS 7 Clairmont Gardens Glasgow G3 7LW Tel: 0141 332 0373 Fax: 0141 332 3182 Email: [email protected] rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Name: Rafe Dewar Title: Senior Ecologist Signature Authorised by: Name: Martin Scott Title: Principal Ornithologist Signature: Current Status: Draft for Comment Issue Date: 14 May 2014 Revision Number: 4 Revision Notes: - Project File Path: J:\SGP 6346 - Scottish Power Argyll Array Birds\Reports\Reports in Progress\ This report has been prepared within the RPS Planning and Development Quality Management System to British Standard EN ISO 9001 : 2008 COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of ScottishPower Renewables and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of ScottishPower Renewables or RPS. rpsgroup.com REPORT TEMPLATE TYPE: Planning ISSUE DATE: 18 May 2011 REVISION NUMBER: - REVISION DATE: - rpsgroup.com CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 The Project ............................................................................................................................................ 1 The Habitat Regulations Requirements ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SNH Commissioned Report 628: the Scottish Gannet Survey 2004
    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 628 The Scottish gannet survey 2004 COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 628 The Scottish gannet survey 2004 For further information on this report please contact: Andy Douse Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House INVERNESS IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Wanless, S., Murray, S., Harris, M.P. & Evans, S. 2015. The Scottish gannet survey 2004. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 628. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2015. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary The Scottish gannet survey 2004 Commissioned Report No. 628 Project No: F04AC301 Contractor: Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Year of publication: 2015 Keywords Gannet; Site Condition Monitoring; SPA; Sula Sgeir. Background Scotland’s Special Protection Areas (SPAs) support 80% of the British breeding population of northern gannets Morus bassanus. There are 15 ‘aggregations of breeding birds’ features that are notified for gannet in Scotland, seven of which are on SSSIs and eight on SPAs. Site condition monitoring is carried out on a six-year rolling programme. The gannet had low priority in Seabird 2000 and no counts were made of the three largest colonies, nor was Sula Sgeir, the site of the annual guga hunt, counted. This contract aimed to: assess numbers and conservation status, list any threats and establish survey protocols for gannet colonies on Bass Rock, Sule Skerry, Sule Stack, Sula Sgeir, Flannan Isles, St Kilda, Ailsa Craig and Scare Rocks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Leach's Oceanodroma Leucorhoa and European Storm-Petrel Hydrobates Pelagicus Populations on North Rona and Sula Sg
    Leach’s and European Storm-petrel populations on North Rona and Sula Sgeir, Scotland, in 2009 A survey of Leach’s Oceanodroma leucorhoa and European Storm-petrel Hydrobates pelagicus populations on North Rona and Sula Sgeir, Western Isles, Scotland, in 2009 Murray, S.1*, Shewry, M. C.2, Harden, J.,3 Jamie, K.4 and Parsons, M.5 *Correspondence author. Email: [email protected] 1 Easter Craigie Dhu, Butterstone, Dunkeld, Perthshire PH8 0EY, UK; 2 Lylowan Cottage, Dunfermline, Fife KY12 0SG, UK; 3 Glaickchoile Cottage, Buntait, Glen Urquhart, Invernesshire IV63 6TN, UK; 4 217 High Street, Newburgh, Fife KY14 6DY, UK; 5 Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Inverdee House, Baxter Street, Aberdeen AB11 9QA, UK. Abstract In 2001, surveys of both Leach’s Oceanodroma leucorhoa and European Storm- petrel Hydrobates pelagicus were made on North Rona and Sula Sgeir, Western Isles, Scotland, using tape playback for the first time. North Rona held 1,133 apparently occupied sites (AOS) of Leach’s Storm-petrel (1,084 AOS after re- analysis of the 2001 data in 2009) and 371 AOS of European Storm-petrel; numbers on Sula Sgeir were five and eight AOS respectively. A repeat survey in 2009 using the same methods found 713 AOS of Leach’s Storm-petrel on North Rona, a decline of about 34% since 2001, and none on Sula Sgeir. A partial survey of European Storm-petrel on North Rona found 313 AOS, suggesting no significant population change since 2001; limited time on Sula Sgeir prevented a survey there for this species. Great Skuas Stercorarius skua and Great Black-backed Gulls Larus marinus breed on North Rona and take an unknown number of storm-petrels each year, but it has yet to demonstrated whether either or both together have caused the decline in Leach’s Storm-petrel.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Sea Kayaking Sea Scottish
    Scottish Sea Kayaking At last, here it is… Scotland’s first guidebook for sea kayakers wishing to explore its amazing coastline and magical islands. It brings together a selection of fifty great sea voyages around the mainland of Scotland, Doug Cooper & George Reid from the Mull of Galloway in the SW to St Abb’s Head on the east coast, as well as voyages in the Western Isles, ranging from day trips to three day journeys. Illustrated with superb colour photographs and useful maps throughout, it is a practical guide to help you select and plan trips. It will provide inspiration for future voyages and a souvenir of journeys undertaken. As well as providing essential information on where to start and finish, distances, times and tidal information, the book does much to stimulate and inform our interest in the environment we are passing through. It is full of facts and anecdotes about local history, geology, scenery, seabirds and sea mammals. A fascinating read and an inspirational book. Scottish Sea Kayaking Scottish Sea Kayaking fifty great sea kayak voyages fifty great sea kayak voyages Doug Cooper & George Reid Also available from 35 36 38 39 33 37 Pesda Press 40 27 26 Sea Kayak Navigation 41 The Seamanship Pocketbook Stornoway 32 25 Welsh Sea Kayaking 24 South West Sea Kayaking 22 34 21 The Northern Isles 31 23 Oileáin - A Guide to the Irish Islands 18 43 30 17 44 Kayak Surfing 42 16 Kayak Rolling 29 19 Scottish White Water 15 Inverness 45 English White Water 14 20 Canoe and Kayak Handbook White Water Safety and Rescue 13 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Odd Rocks in the Outer Hebrides” Michael Spencer Sheetlines, 114 (April 2019), Pp8-15 Stable URL
    Sheetlines The journal of THE CHARLES CLOSE SOCIETY for the Study of Ordnance Survey Maps “Odd rocks in the Outer Hebrides” Michael Spencer Sheetlines, 114 (April 2019), pp8-15 Stable URL: www.charlesclosesociety.org/files/OddrocksinOuterHebrides.pdf This article is provided for personal, non-commercial use only. Please contact the Society regarding any other use of this work. Published by THE CHARLES CLOSE SOCIETY for the Study of Ordnance Survey Maps www.CharlesCloseSociety.org The Charles Close Society was founded in 1980 to bring together all those with an interest in the maps and history of the Ordnance Survey of Great Britain and its counterparts in the island of Ireland. The Society takes its name from Colonel Sir Charles Arden-Close, OS Director General from 1911 to 1922, and initiator of many of the maps now sought after by collectors. The Society publishes a wide range of books and booklets on historic OS map series and its journal, Sheetlines, is recognised internationally for its specialist articles on Ordnance Survey-related topics. 8 Odd rocks in the Outer Hebrides Michael Spencer Certain rocks and clusters of rocks exist off the west coast of Scotland that are not shown consistently at all scales on the map. Before pointing the finger at the OS, we should perhaps decide what we want the map to show. And as usual, with any question relating to the sea, we have to start with the tides. 1. Tides It is well known that the diurnal variation in the height of the tide is a result of the gravitational fields of the sun and the moon, their effects moderated by the motion of the earth in these fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science
    Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Volume 5 Number 9 Strategic surveys of seabirds off the west coast of Lewis to determine use of seaspace in areas of potential marine renewable energy developments © Crown copyright 2014 Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Vol 5 No 9 Strategic surveys of seabirds off the west coast of Lewis to determine use of seaspace in areas of potential marine renewable energy developments Published by Marine Scotland Science ISSN: 2043-7722 Marine Scotland is the directorate of the Scottish Government responsible for the integrated management of Scotland’s seas. Marine Scotland Science (formerly Fisheries Research Services) provides expert scientific and technical advice on marine and fisheries issues. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science is a series of reports that publishes results of research and monitoring carried out by Marine Scotland Science. It also publishes the results of marine and freshwater scientific work that has been carried out for Marine Scotland under external commission. These reports are not subject to formal external peer-review. This report presents the results of marine and freshwater scientific work carried out for Marine Scotland under external commission. Copies of this report are available from the Marine Scotland website at www.scotland.gov.uk/marinescotland Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust (Consulting) Ltd and HiDef Aerial Survey Limited accept no responsibility or liability for any use which is made of this document other than by the Client for the purpose for which it was originally
    [Show full text]