Government of India Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Office of Development Commissioner (MSME), 7 Floor, a Wing

Government of India Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Office of Development Commissioner (MSME), 7th Floor, A Wing, Nirman Bhawan, Maulana Azad Road, New Delhi-110108

Agenda

for

54th Meeting of Steering Committee

Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP)

Date &Time : 02.03.2021 at 3:00 PM

Venue : New Delhi

INDEX

Agenda Description Page No. Points 54.1 Confirmation of Minutes 1 54.2 Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 2 54.3 Proposals for Final Approval Andhra Pradesh 54.3.1 CFC in Gold Ornaments Cluster, Jaggayyapet, Krishna District 3 54.3.2 CFC in Printing Cluster, Kakinada, East Godavari 10 54.3.3 CFC in Pulses & Pulses Products Cluster, Rayavaram Mandal, East 17 Godavari 54.3.4 Up-gradation of Industrial Park (Jewellery Park), Machlipatnam 24 54.3.5 Up-gradation of Growth Centre, Hindupur, Ananthapuramu 28 54.3.6 Up-gradation of Industrial Park Autonagar, Guntur 32 Goa 54.3.7 CFC in Maritime Cluster, Goa 36 Gujarat 54.3.8 CFC in Imitation Jewellery Cluster, Ahmedabad 43 Haryana 54.3.9 CFC in Ayurveda Cluster, Karnal 49 Kerala 54.3.10 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate Rubber Park at Irapuram, 58 Ernakulam Madhya Pradesh 54.3.11 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Govindpura, Bhopal 62 54.3.12 Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Sanawad District Khargaone 70 54.3.13 Setting up of new Industrial Estate Food Processing at Rajgarh 74 54.3.14 Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Choradongari Village, District 78 Betul 54.3.15 Setting up of new Akodi Lac Industrial Estate at Balaghat 82 Manipur 54.3.16 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Imphal East District 86 54.3.17 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District 92 Odisha 54.3.18 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Angaragadia, Balasore 98 54.3.19 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Chandaka (Phase-I), Khorda 102 54.3.20 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Paradeep, Jagatsinghpur 106 54.3.21 Up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack 110 Punjab 54.3.22 CFC in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana 114 54.3.23 CFC in Cutting Tool Cluster, Patiala 121 Tamil Nadu 54.3.24 CFC in Jewellery Cluster, Tirunelveli 129 Telangana Agenda Description Page No. Points 54.3.25 Setting up of New Industrial Estate, Mandapally, Siddipet 137 Uttar Pradesh 54.3.26 CFC in Terracotta Pottery Cluster, Gorakhapur 141 54.4 Proposals for Time Extension Telangana 54.4.1 Setting up of new Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering 148 Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District 54.5 Ratification of Decisions Haryana 54.5.1 CFC in Stainless Steel Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana 150 54.5.2 CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana 151 54.5.3 CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana 152 54.5.4 CFC in Plastic & Packaging Cluster, Karnal 153 Kerala 54.5.5 Up-gradation of ID Plots at Edayar, Ernakulam District 154 54.5.6 Up-gradation of Industrial Development Project at Poovanthuruthu, 155 Kottayam District Madhya Pradesh 54.5.7 CFC in Plastic & Packaging Cluter, Ujjain 157 Punjab 54.5.8 CFC in Hi-tech Cluster, Mohali 158 54.5.9 CFC in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana 159 Uttar Pradesh 54.5.10 CFC in Readymade Garments Cluster, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh 160 54.5.11 CFC in Zari Zardozi Cluster, Unnao 161 54.6 Any Other 54.6.1 CFC in Rice Mill Cluster, Balasore – Deletion of Proposed facilities 162 ******** Item No. 54.1. : Confirmation of Minutes of 53rd Meeting of National Level Steering Committee held on 14.07.2020.

Minutes of 53rd Meeting of Steering Committee held on 14.07.20 were uploaded on the website and communicated to stakeholders. Minutes are annexed at Annexure-I. Since no comments have been received from any of the members, minutes may kindly be confirmed.

******

Item No. 54.2 : Action Taken Report on the action points of 53rd Meeting of Steering Committee

Item No. Item Description Decision Taken Action Taken 53.3.1 to Final approval for various proposals. Final approval accorded 53.3.32

53.4.1 to Ratification of decisions taken on Ratified the decision of 53.4.5 file. time extension.

53.5 Any Other Points Communicated 53.5.1 to Re-allocation of funds in respect of 53rd NLSC minutes to all 53.5.3 up-gradation of Industrial attached. concerned Infrastructure in Focal Point, Phase- IV, Ludhiana, Punjab.

Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar, Punjab.

Setting up of Integrated Infrastructure Development (IID) Centre at Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab. 53.6 Extension of Time 53.6.1(S) Setting up of CFC in Global Puffed Ratified the decision of Rice Cluster, Holalkere Road, time extension. Chitradurga, Karnataka.

*******

Agenda No. 54.3.1: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Gold Ornament Cluster, Jaggayyapeta, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was recommended in the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) meeting held on 20.12.19 for final approval.  Vide letter dated 24.09.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on lease basis, Provided registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years). (ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iii) Details of officials of Govt. of AP and Govt. of India on the Board of Provided CFC. (iv) Document regarding authorized share capital and paid up capital. Provided (v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided (vi) Copy of Memorandum of Association and Article of Association. Provided (vii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Required (viii) Details of project specific bank account. Required (ix) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Provided cluster are Micro/ SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (x) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation Provided cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (xi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent of Provided installed capacity. (xii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC Provided guidelines. (xiii) Recommendation of Senior Most Technical officer of MSME-DO. Provided (xiv) Comments of Economic Officer of MSME-DO on the project proposal Provided on economic viability of the project.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of cluster

Name of cluster Gold Ornament Cluster District Krishna Location of cluster Jaggayyapeta Lok Sabha Constituency Vijayawada Main Product Gold Bangles, Gold Bracelet, Gold Chains & Gold Rings, Gold Idols, Gold Lockets, Gold Earrings , Gold Necklace, Gold Nose Pins & Nose Rings No. of Enterprises including break Micro - 195 up (Micro, Small, Medium) Turnover for the last five years 2014-15 : Rs. 18.50 (Rs in Crore) 2015-16 : Rs. 19.00 2016-17 : Rs. 19.50 2017-18 : Rs. 20.10 2018-19 : Rs. 20.95

Exports for the last five years (Rs Nil in Crore)

Employment in cluster Direct 1050 Indirect 365 Technology details Hand tools, small furnace, Dies for Moulding, Wire Drawing Machine, Sheet Drawing Machine etc. Whether DS conducted Yes Main findings of DSR Fairly Good Skills, Scope for Use of CAD CAM, Good Domestic Demand, No Visible Exports, High Wastage Main Problems of cluster High Wastage No Testing and Hall Marking facilities in the cluster, No CAD CAM facility in the cluster, High cost of machinery non affordable to micro enterprises Other Information Cluster know for supply of jewelleries to royal families also known for making gold idols and ornaments for famous temples.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Justification for CFC More than 1950 artisans (Organized and Unorganized) lack basic infrastructure facilities and proper tools in the cluster and are depending on part manufacturing firms for making of various types of gold ornaments. Further the die used by them are old with redundant design. Hence there is a need for establishment of Die Moulding Centre in the cluster. It will also have sheet and wire drawing facility which will reduce the wastage as compared to the existing machines in the cluster. The proposed facility will cater to the needs of 800 (Both Organized and Unorganized) firm in the cluster. As BIS has made it mandatory for Jewellery Industry to follow hall mark norms and maintain the specified purity, majority of the cluster firms are finding it tough to know purity of the ornament they make. This is resulting in higher rejection rates and dent in profit margins. Further non availability of Hall Marking facility in the vicinity of the cluster forces the artisan to send jewellery far off distance to comply with the norms, which is costing them higher than the standard industry norms. Thus there is definite need to establish a common testing cum 3D laser Hall Mark Facility in the cluster to overcome the gap. The cluster is also into manufacturing of Necklace, which needs proper designing and prototyping for casting. The cluster do not have a CAD / CAM facility and are dependent on facilities in Mumbai. The time and

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) cost involved for utilizing CAD / CAM in Mumbai is high and is hampering the growth of the cluster. Hence a CAD/ CAM facility is proposed as CFC. (b.) Location of CFC RS. No. 275/1A1, D. No. 2-118, Jaggayyapeta, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh % age of units in radius of 5km 100 % age of units in radius of 0 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Lease deed for a ii. Title is in name of M. Pavani and M. Pratyusha period of 33 years in the name of SPV iii. Valuation and its basis NA received. iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Under Process vi. If on lease, duration of lease 33 Years vii Whether lease is legally Yes tenable (d.) Total Building area 3475 (sq ft) (e.) Rate of construction of Rs. 1381 per Sq. Ft. building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Common Die Moulding Centre  Common Testing cum 3D Laser Hall Marking Centre  Common CAD / CAM Centre  XRF (X-Ray Florence Spectrometer) Metal Analysis. (g.) Prod capacity of CFC 36000 job works in Die Moulding 600 Kg of Sheet & Wire Drawing 63000 testing & hall markings 2400 Design per annum 30000 CAM jobs per annum (h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables The proposed hard interventions will of CFC, Projected performance of show substantial increase in the tangible the cluster after proposed parameters like in number of units, intervention (in terms of employment, production. Besides, production, export/domestic sales intangible aspects like major and direct/indirect employment, improvement in quality and increase the etc.) domestic sales by minimum of 30 percent and also open up the avenues for export market. The following table substantiates the above points: Table E3: Performance of the Cluster post intervention Sl. No. Parameters Pre-CFC Post CFC 1 Beneficiary Units 195 800 2 Increase in Employment (Both Direct & Indirect in core Cluster firms) 1415 1890 3 Increase in production (Kg) 1500 1985 4 Domestic Sales 20.95 29.00 5 Profit Margin 5% 10% 6 Indirect Export Sales 0 1.00 All the 800 (Both Organized & Unorganized) firms are expected to get 5

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) benefitted from the establishment of CFC. Each and every facility of the CFC will be open for use of the Cluster firms irrespective of if they are members or not in the SPV. However the beneficiary unit figure may vary from one facility to another. The employment and production is expected to grow at the rate of 20% considering increase in production capacities of goldsmiths and part manufacturing firms due to establishment of common processing centre and initiation of direct marketing. A 30% growth in turnover is expected at cluster level due to increased production levels by cluster firms with processing centre, improved market share due to quality and hall marking besides inflation. The profit are expected to improve by 100% from current level of 5% to 10% post implementation of the CFC. The improved quality and hall marking will definitely pave the way for composite manufacturing firms to initiate indirect export marketing. (i.) Pollution clearance required Required Signed copy of NOC or not is required. (j.) Man Power in CFC 24 (k.) Revenue generation User Charges mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified) (l.) NA

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address Viswarupa Goldsmith Foundation D.NO.2- 183, Sri Balaji Jewellary, Beside Old Madan Bakary, Mutyala Road, Jaggayyapeta Krishna AP-521175 (b.) Nature of SPV(company Company registered under companies act or Society or Trust) 2013 (c.) Name of the state Govt. NA and MSME officials in SPV (d.) Date of formation of SPV 31st August 2018 (e.) Number of Members 50 (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA AOA enclosed Received submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital 1000000 (h.) Paid up capital as 100000 on...... 6

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received (j.) Commitment letter for Submitted Received contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c Opened in Indian Bank -- (l.) Trust Building of SPV, SPV has attended machinery exhibition in Previous track record of co- Mumbai and Chennai Visited CFC operative initiatives pursued by Vijayawada Gold Ornament Cluster SPV members need to to be Artisans card issued to members Validation highlighted with support Programme done for DPR documentation (m.) Technical Institution To be appointed after final sanction (n.) CFC may be utilized by Enclosed SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilize at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) (a) Power requirement for 10 HP commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water 500 KLPA (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency Corporation (APTPC) (c.) Implementation Period 12 Months (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Submitted Appraisal report received. Recommendations (e.) Comments of Technical Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 70th Division meeting held on 20.12.19 recommended the proposal to be placed (f.) Approval of Technical before Steering Committee for consideration and approval subject Committee to submission of requisite documents. (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In- NA principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) BEP 47.63% As per SIDBI, 36.45% 7

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (b.) IRR, Payback period 13.16% As per SIDBI, 14.87% (after tax) (c.) DSCR NA (No DEBT) -- (d.) Return on Capital employed 28.28% As per SIDBI, 39.46% (ROCE) (e.) NPV 115.22 As per SIDBI, Rs. 360.56 lakh (+) (before tax) (f.) DER NA (No DEBT) -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis CFC can withstand 10% drop in -- Capacity Utilization added with 10% decrease in User charges (h.) Status of CFCs approved in CFC implemented in Vijayawada the State Gold Cluster CFC under implementation in Nellore Gold Cluster

6. Proposed project cost is as follow: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended As per MSE- by IA by SIDBI CDP (i) Land and its Development 0.00 4.00 4.00 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 48.00 48.00 48.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery (including 671.61 671.61 671.61 electrification) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 24.00 5.00 5.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, 16.85 31.85 15.36 maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on 34.54 34.54 34.54 plant and machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 5.00 5.00 5.00 Total 800.00 800.00 768.15

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars % Proposed by Recommended As per MSE- IA by SIDBI CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 80.00 640.00 640.00 614.52 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of A.P. 10.00 80.00 80.00 80.00 (iii) SPV contribution 10.00 80.00 80.00 105.48 Total 100.00 800.00 800.00 800.00

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Description No. Amount 1. Sheet & Wire Drawing Machine, Vekaria Brand Model No. 1 6.655 HRX-8580 , 2HP 3Phase Motor Auto reversing switch of 8

S. No. Description No. Amount AMRX7525C-05 2. DIES 2200 Nos - High Grade HSS With Various Models as per 2200 156.816 Nucleus, Bangles and Rings 3. DIES 3500 Nos - High Grade Bronze Metal, With Various 3500 190.575 Models as per Nucleus, Bangles and Rings 4. Generator - 62 kVA 1 7.744 5. Jewellery Security Safe Locker 2 2.178 6. Laser Marking Machine 1 28.13 7. XRF Machine 2 71.39 8. Assay Balance 1 11.69 9. Sartorius Analytical Balance 1 1.510 10. Sartorius Precision Balance 2 2.060 11. 50Mg. E-2 Class Wire Weight 1 0.070 12. 100Mg. E-2 Class Wire Weight 2 0.150 13. 200Mg. E-2 Class Wire Weight 1 0.070 14. Additional Display attachement 1 0.070 15. Tools & Equipment for sampling 1 9.08 16. Furnaces, Scrubber, Parting Tray ets. 1 10.29 17. Safety Equipment 1 10.29 18. Certfied Reference Material 1 10.41 19. CAD / CAM Centre 1 152.46 Total 671.638

9. Observations:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Signed copy of NOC from State Pollution Control Board. (ii) Details of project specific bank account of Implementing Agency. (iii) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.

Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Gold Ornament Cluster, Jaggayyapeta, Krishna, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.800.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 614.52 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 80.00 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 105.48 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.2: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Printing Cluster, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide letter dated 20.10.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered lease deed for land and building in the name of Provided SPV for a period of 30 years. (ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iii) Certificate of SPV formation. Provided (iv) Details of SPV members and their shareholding pattern. Provided (v) Details of SPV’s bank account/ Mandate form. Provided (vi) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Provided (vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units Required in the cluster are Micro/ SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the Provided escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (ix) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least Provided 60% of installed capacity. (x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ Required CVC guidelines. (xi) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be Provided enhanced and list of members to be provided. (xii) Commitment letter from Director of Industries, Govt. of Provided Andhra Pradesh regarding State Government’s contribution of 20% of total project cost.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster Printing Cluster District East Godavari Location of Cluster Kakinada Lok Sabha Constituency Kakinada Main Product Business cards Print, Text Books Print, Pamphlets Print, Journals Print, Wedding cards Print, Poster Print, Letter heads Print, Diaries print, Hotel menus Print, Calendars Print, Receipt books Print, ID Cards Print. No. of Enterprises including Micro- 150 break up (Micro, Small, Medium) Turnover for the last five years 2014-15 : 59.82 (Rs in Crore) 2015-16 : 64.67

2016-17 : 70.31 2017-18 : 78.21 2018-19 : 82.50

Exports for the last five years Nil (Rs in Crore) Employment in Cluster 3900 (Direct – 900 & Indirect – 3000) Technology Details The Cluster Members are using Traditional Methods mostly offset Printing Machinery and Screen Printing Technology, Single/Two colour Printing, Drum type and Plate type Press based Impression Printing Methods. Whether DS Conducted Yes Main findings of DSR The cluster units lack modern CTP Processing technology, high resolution Multi colour printers, variable data printing technology, modern finishing and post press machining facilities. There is very little product diversification and value addition taking place due to lack of modern equipment. The cluster products are unable to meet market quality requirements and parameters. The Cluster lack Training facility for upgrading the skills of the cluster entrepreneurs and work force. Main Problems of Cluster  The cluster units modern CTP (Computer to plate) Processing technology.  The cluster units high resolution Multi colour printers.  The cluster units lack variable data printing technology.  The cluster units modern finishing and post press machining facilities.  There is very little product diversification and value addition taking place due to lack of modern equipment.  The cluster products are unable to meet market quality requirements and parameters.  The Cluster lack Training facility for upgrading the skills of the cluster entrepreneurs and work force.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC The progressive printers of today are equipped -- with the latest computer controlled printing machines and flow lines for binding, while state of the art digital technologies are being used in pre-press. Leading print companies have optimized the use of information technology in each and every area of their business. These printers are today equipped at par with the best print production facilities in the world. A common facility center is very much needed in order to keep up with the changing trends necessary interventions are needed at the base level. If a CFC is established, the cluster units will be tremendously benefited. The original licensed version software at the CFC will only be used for training purpose but also for designing the graphical content with activated and updated tools to satisfy the industrial and training needs of the cluster units. The cluster members who are at present dependent upon customer service kind of market will be able to produce and launch 11

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks their own products like diaries, books, labels, calendars etc. as the CFC will be able to provide necessary infrastructure. The CFC will be able to give the cluster members to enhance their market reach.The shortage of skilled workforce that the cluster units faced can be easily overcome with the training facilities which will be able to train the existing workforce and also to the new workforce who could easily be absorbed by the industry. The most important contribution of the CFC to the cluster members is the availability of advanced multi colour and variable data printers, pre-press printing and post press finishing equipment that will boost their production activities and will decrease the critical gaps present in the present process. A common facility center at will help the cluster units tremendously as they will be less dependent on Rajahmundry city leading to increase in revenue as unnecessary expenditure of travelling, transportation, work force diversion will be reduced leading to the overall development of the cluster units. The CFC will help to improve the competitiveness of the cluster members and will provide the strength to the cluster members to compete with larger national and multinational brands and companies (b.) Location of CFC Kakinada, east Godavari Dist, Andhra Pradesh -- % age of units in radius of 0 -- 5km % age of units in radius of 100 -- 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes, on lease Registered lease ii. Title is in name of SPV deed for land and building in the name iii. Valuation and its basis - of SPV for a period iv. Land is sufficient Yes of 30 years received. v. Change of land use Nil vi. If on lease, duration of 30 years lease vii Whether lease is yes legally tenable (d.) Total Building area(sq 5700 sft ft) (e.) Rate of construction of 48.75 Lakhs building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Common Facility Center with computer to -- Plate Making Facility.  Common Facility Center with high resolution Multi colour offset printer.  Common Facility Center with advance variable printing facility.  Common Facility Center with Post Press 12

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks Finishing Machines.  Common Facility Center with Marketing and Display center.  Common Raw Material Bank.  CFC with Training, and Design facility. (g.) Prod capacity of CFC Computer to Plate CTP can produce 60,000 -- plates per annum, Multi Colour Offset Printing Single Dummy Setup can print 36000000 prints per annum, Multi Colour Printing Machine Double Dummy Setup can print 9600000 prints per annum, Automatic Paper Cutting can earn revenue of Rs 1,80,000/-,per annum Folding Machine can earn Rs 600000/- per annum ,Gumming Machine can earn Rs 120000/-per annum (h.) Major S. No. Particulars Before CFC After CFC Outputs/Deliverables of (i) No. of units 150 250 CFC, Projected (ii) Turnover Rs. 82.00 Rs. 110.00 performance of the cluster (Rs. in within 3 years of after proposed intervention crore) CFC (in terms of production, (iii) Exporting Nil 25 units export/domestic sales and Units direct/indirect employment, (iv) Employment Direct - 900 Direct -1000 etc.) Indirect - 3000 Indirect -5000 (v) Others, if Low profit margin Improvement in any profit margin by Profit 30% margin of individual units

(i.) Pollution clearance SPV will apply for pollution control board for Received required or not NOC for the proposed activity after in-principle approval. (j.) Man Power in CFC Total 20 persons consist of Maintenance -- Engineers, Skilled and supporting staff required for smooth functioning of CFC. (k.) Revenue generation Total revenue generated at 100% utilization is Rs -- mechanism for 1023.50 lakhs sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address Sri Satyadeva Printing Cluster Association, Received Kakinada (b.) Nature of SPV(company or Society -- Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the State Govt. and State Govt. and MSME-DI will appoint their Required MSME officials in SPV officials after final approval of cluster (d.) Date of formation of SPV 07.09.2019 --

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (e.) Number of Members 159 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA Submitted Received submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital -- -- (h.) Paid up capital as on...... Nil -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal Received (j.) Commitment letter for submitted Received contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c SPV will open Bank Account after in- Received principle approval of proposal (l.) Trust Building of SPV, SPV has already organized trust building -- Previous track record of co- programmes like awareness workshop of operative initiatives pursued by CDP, conducted skill development SPV members need to be programmes, exposure visits, selection of highlighted with support machinery etc documentation (m.) Technical Institution There are several institutions that are -- supporting SPV namely Commissioner of Industries, MSME-DI, Vishakhapatnam, DIC, Local Engg. Colleges and Financial institutions Etc (n.) CFC may be utilised by Undertaking submitted by SPV assuring that Received SPV members as also others in a 60% capacity of Plant & machinery will be cluster. However, evidence utilized by cluster firms. should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) Utilities (a) Power requirement for 144.55 KW -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water 500 lts per day -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion Corporation As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency (APTPC), Vijayawada (c.) Implementation Period 24 months 24 months from the date of issuance of final approval letter

(d.) Appraisal of DPR and Submitted SIDBI appraisal main Recommendations report submitted. (e.) Comments of Technical Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 68th Meeting Division held on 04.09.19 recommended the proposal to place before Steering (f.) Approval of Technical Committee for In-principle approval. Committee

(g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In- The SPV will approach bank after getting in- -- principle sanction of loan principle approval from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) BEP 43% -- (b.) IRR, Payback period 27% -- (c.) DSCR Not Applicable -- (d.) Return on Capital 31% -- employed (ROCE) (e.) NPV 32% -- (f.) DER Not Applicable -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitive analysis is calculated on decrease in -- revenue at 5 to 10%, the key financial indicators are economically viable (h.) Status of CFCs approved Two CFCs viz Gold Ornaments cluster, -- in the State Vijayawada and Machilipatnam Imitation Jewellery cluster successfully implemented in the state of Andhra Pradesh

6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by Recommended IA by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) Land & Buildings 111.75 111.75 (ii) Plant and Machineries 1245.25 1245.25 (iii) Misc. Fixed Assets 20.00 20.00 (iv) Pre operative expenses 20.00 20.00 (v) Provision for Contingencies 63.60 63.60 (vi) Margin Money 15.40 15.40 Total Project Cost 1476.00 1476.00

7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) Government of India grant 1180.80 1033.20 (ii) State Government contribution 147.60 295.20 (iii) SPV contribution 147.60 147.60 Total 1476.00 1476.00

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost 1. Computer to Plate CTP Machine Setup 1 61.00 15

S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost 2. Multi Colour Offset Printing Single Dummy Setup 1 373.92 3. Multi Colour Printing Machine Double Dummy Setup 1 511.68 4. Automatic Paper Cutting Machine, Size 45” 1 28.53 5. Folding Machine 23 x 36 1 27.55 6. Gumming Machine 6 Clamp 1 17.71 7. Lamination Machine 1 7.88 8. 4 Hi Web Double Reel Stand with Quarter Page Folder 1 127.92 9. Digital Offset Machine 1 45.26 10. Sheetfed Offset Machine Double Crown 1 23.62 11. Diesel Generator-200kva 1 14.76 12. Computers, Scanner, Printer 1 5.42 Total 1245.25

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/ SC/ST/ Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (ii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines. (iii) Inclusion of name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV. (iv) Inclusion of condition in bye-laws that SPV will not eligible for drawing any profit from operation of the CFC and profit generated during the operation shall be ploughed back for further development of CFC. (v) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Printing Cluster, Kakinada, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1476.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1033.20 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 295.20 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 147.60 lakh.

Agenda No. 54.3.3: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Pulses & Pulses Products Cluster, Machavaram Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide letter dated 19.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Justification for Cold Storage Facility under Plant & Machinery, as Provided pulses does not fall under the category of perishable items. (ii) Being Agro-rural based cluster, a time bound & measurable (on year Required to-year-basis) outcome based road map/Concept Note for backward integration of farmers (cultivating pulses) for their socio-economic upliftment. (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iv) Details of all units in the cluster. Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Provided (vi) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA. Provided (vii) List of SPV members and details Provided (viii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members. Provided (ix) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution Provided (x) Details of Project specific bank account. Provided (xi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent Provided of installed capacity. (xii) Commitment letter from State Government/SPV to meet the Provided escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost (xiii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Not required cluster are Micro /SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (xiv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC Required guidelines (xv) Registered deed documents for land and building in the name of SPV Provided (if land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required) (xvi) Document regarding Non Agriculture conversion for change of land Provided use (xvii) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be enhanced and Required list of members to be provided. (xviii) Undertakings from State Government as well as SPV that CFC will Provided not sell the products

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster: Pulses and Pulses Products Cluster District: East Godavari Location of Cluster: Machavaram Lok Sabha Constituency: Kakinada Main Product: Pulses and Pulses Products of different varieties like Red gram (tur dhal), Green gram (mung dhal), Black gram (urad 17

dhal), Bengal gram (chana dhal), (lentil), Toor Dal, Mix Dal Flour for Dosa, Wada, Baby Mix Dal Food Products. No. of Enterprises including break Micro : 119 up (Micro, Small, Medium): Turnover for the last five years Year : Amount (Rs in Crore): 2014-15 Rs.51.91 2015-16 : Rs.57.20 2016-17 : Rs.62.92 2017-18 : Rs.68.40 2018-19 : Rs.770.00

Exports for the last five years Nil (Rs in Crore): Employment in Cluster: 2095 Nos. (Direct - 595 & Indirect- 1500) Technology Details: The cluster members are skilled in pulses processing from their age old experience. At present the cluster members are using traditional methods and semi automatic dal mills of processing capacity ranging from 100 kg to 200 kg per hour and are micro in nature. Lot of advancement has taken place in the processing technology, however the cluster members are economically weak and are dependent on mechanical processing equipments. Whether DS Conducted: Yes Main findings of DSR:  The cluster lacks a dedicated raw material purchase mechanism.  The cluster is adopting age old technolgies which are hindering the growth of cluster.  The cluster lacks dedicated cold storage centre and warehouse. The cluster products have very huge market and demand but the marketing methodologies adopted are incapable to capture the market for profitability.  The cluster lack grading, sorting and polishing facility as result, proper price tagging of the raw material and processed pulses is difficult.  The cluster lack advance training and R&D / value added product development centre to address the problems faced by the cluster and for developing advance methodologies for sustainability and accelerated growth. Main Problems of Cluster:  Prolonged process.  Lack of pulses drying machineries.  Lack of fine cleaning and grading facility.  Lack of pulses polishing and sorting facility.  Poor packaging practices.  Testing facility not available in the cluster region.  Lack of national market reach, dominance of traders.  Lack of storage facilities.  Poor value addition and product diversification.  Lack of research and training facility. Other Information: NA

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Justification for CFC The establishment of CFC in the cluster -- will minimize the wastage and will improve the quality of the pulses. Thus the 18

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) project is need based and support worthy. (b.) Location of CFC The proposed CFC will be established at -- Machavaram village, Rayavaram Mandal of East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. % age of units in radius of 5km 70 -- % age of units in radius of 30 -- 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Lease, land 1.06 acres. The SPV has taken ii. Title is in name of SPV land and building having 1.06 cents iii. Valuation and its basis Leased building /acres with built-up iv. Land is sufficient Yes area of building as 20,000 sq feet on v. Change of land use N.A lease for 15.6 years. vi. If on lease, duration of lease 15.6 Years vii Whether lease is legally Land and building has been identified and tenable SPV has undertaken the lease agreement with the owner. (d.) Total Building area SPV will take the building on lease, total -- built up area of 20000 sq. ft. (e.) Rate of construction of N.A. -- building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Automatic Pulses dryers  Automatic Fine Cleaning and Size  Grading Facility  Automatic Color Sorting Facility  Automatic Pulses Polishing Machine  Common Packaging center with Automatic Pouch and Bag Packing Machines  Common testing facility for Pulses of BIS and FSSAI Standards  Common marketing and Export Centre.  Cold Storage Facility.  Value Added Product Development Centre  Pulses Processing Research & Training Centre (g.) Prod capacity of CFC 20000 Tons per year after CFC setup --

(h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables S. Particulars Before CFC After CFC of CFC, Projected performance of No. the cluster after proposed (i) No. of units 119 150 intervention (in terms of (ii) Turnover Rs. 77 crores Rs. 100 crores production, export/ domestic sales (Rs. in After 2 to 3 years and direct /indirect employment, crore) of CFC etc.) (iii) Exports Nil Direct exports by 5 units (iv) Employment Direct -595 Direct -1000 Indirect -1500 Indirect -3000 (v) Others, if Inconsistent Consistent and 20 any profit margins to 25% Profit due to price higher profits for margin of fluctuations, producers due to 19

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) individual product better quality and units quality price and inconsistencies increased and production inefficiencies efficiencies. in production

(i.) Pollution clearance required or Not required. Provided not (j.) Man Power in CFC 40 Nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation Expected revenue generation at 100% -- mechanism for sustainability of capacity utilization is 952.15 lakh and 85$ assets(service/user charges to be capacity utilization is 814.72 lakh. levied, any other-to be specified) (l.) N.A --

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Name and Address Shri Mahalaxmi Pulses Mills Cluster -- Association. 7-122, Atchutapuram Road, Machavaram, Rayavaram Mandal – 533261. (b.) Nature of SPV(company or The registrar of societies, Kakinada. -- Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the state Govt. and State Govt. and MSME-DI will appoint -- MSME officials in SPV their officials after final approval. (d.) Date of formation of SPV 04.08.18 -- (e.) Number of Members 110 Nos. -- (f.) Bye Laws or MoA and AoA Submitted Provided submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital Equal. -- (h.) Paid up capital as on...... - -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Equal Provided (j.) Commitment letter for Submitted Provided contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c SPV will take initiative to open new bank Provided account with nationalized bank after in- principle approval. (l.) Trust Building of SPV, SPV has already organized trust building -- Previous track record of co- programmes like awareness workshop of operative initiatives pursued by CDP, conducted skill development SPV members need to be programmes, exposure visits, selection of highlighted with support machinery etc. documentation (m.) Technical Institution Intaglio Technical and Business Services -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV Undertaking submitted by the SPV Provided members as also others in a assuring that 60% capacity of plant & cluster. However, evidence should machinery will be utilized by the cluster 20

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) be furnished with regard to SPV firms. member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) (a) Power requirement for Total power of 260 KVA is required for a -- commercial/domestic purpose shift of 8 hrs per day. (b) Water 10000 lts per day and shall be available -- through borewell. (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities NA --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Trade Promotion As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency Corporation (APTPC), Vijayawada. (c.) Implementation Period 18 Months 24 months from date of issuance of final approval letter. (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Submitted Submitted Recommendations (e.) Comments of Technical Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 68th Division meeting held on 04.09.19 recommended the proposal to place (f.) Approval of Technical before the Steering Committee for In-principle approval. Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Recommended for in-principle approval under MSE-CDP. Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In-principle The SPV shall approach financial -- sanction of loan from a bank, if institutions for working capital after in- applicable arrangement made) principle approval of the DPR.

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) BEP 36% As per SIDBI BEP in optimum year (FY 2026)= 40.57% (b.) IRR, Payback period 27% As per SIDBI IRR (after tax)= 17.57% (c.) DSCR NA -- (d.) Return on Capital employed 30% As per SIDBI (ROCE) ROCE in optimum year (FY 2026)= 41.10% Average ROCE= 47.56% (e.) NPV 29% As per SIDBI NPV (after tax)= Rs. 539.83 lakh (positive)

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (f.) DER Not Applicable -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is calculated on decrease in revenue in 5- 10%. The key initial indicators are economically viable. (h.) Status of CFCs approved in -- the State

6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. Particulars Proposed Recommended by SIDBI/ No. by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Land & Building 120.00 120.00 (ii) Plant and Machineries 1244.82 1244.82 (iii) Misc. Fixed Assets 20.00 20.00 (iv) Preliminary & Pre Operative Expenditure 20.00 20.00 (v) Contingencies(2% Building and 5% Machineries) 62.24 62.24 (vi) Margin Value of Working Capital 16.00 16.00 Total 1483.06 1483.06

7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by SIDBI/ by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1186.44 1038.14* (ii) State Government contribution 148.31 296.61 (iii) SPV contribution 148.31 148.31 Total 1483.06 1483.06 *70% of total project of Rs. 1483.06 lakh.

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost 1. Automatic Pulses Cleaning, 1 107.66 2. Automatic Pulses Grading and Dryer 1 115.01 3. Automatic Colour Sorting Machine Setup 2 160.20 4. Automatic Pulses Polishing Machine Setup 1 92.59 5. Automatic Metal Detector Setup 1 32.35 6. Pouch Packing Machine for Pulses 1 45.02 7. Pouch Packing Machine for Pulses 1 54.86 8. Bag Packing Machine for Pulses 1 88.36 9. Cold Storage for Pulses 1 142.69 10. Weigh Bridge 1 14.82 11. Hydraulic Pallets- Hand Operated 4 1.57 12. Full Electric Stacker 2 9.47 13. Weigh Scale Pallet Truck 1 1.17 14. Universal Weighing Scale 1 1.41 15. Bag Unloading System 2 53.35 16. Testing Laboratory Setup - 31.98 17. Breakfast cereal making mixture and Extruder 1 20.48 18. canned curry ready to mix pulses making machine setup 1 17.53 19. Installation Accessories 1 45.33 20. Computers, Windows Software 5 2.77 22

S. No. Particulars Nos. Total Cost 21. Digital Interactive Classroom Board 1 1.80 22. High Resolution Projector with Auto Lock Screen Projector with 1 0.60 Auto Lock Screen 23. Audio System Amplifier, Speakers with Cordless and Podium 1 0.65 Mic-set 24. All in One Laser Colour Printer Scanner and Copier 1 0.58 25. Accounting Software-Tally 1 3.51 26. Website and ERP Software Design and Development 1 8.43 27. CCT Camera and DVR and EPABX Intercom setup 1 0.81 28. Fire fighting Equipments-set 1 31.67 29. Air-conditioner A/C 2 3.73 2.0 Ton 30. DG Set 1 17.83 31. Electrical Installations- Transformer, Cables, Control Pannels 1 58.12 with wiring 32. Environmental Section 1 41.62 33. Installation and commissioning cost - 36.90 T0tal 1244.82

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines. (ii) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act. (iii) No. of beneficiary units (non SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members. (iv) Being Agro-rural based cluster, a time bound & measurable (on year to-year-basis) outcome based road map/Concept Note for backward integration of farmers (cultivating pulses) for their socio-economic upliftment.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Pulses & Pulses Products Cluster, Machavaram Village, Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1483.06 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1038.14 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 296.61 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 148.31 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.4: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park (Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide email dated 20.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Letter for enhancement of State Government share to 30% Provided (ii) English version of registered land documents in the name of Provided Implementing Agency. (iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Provided (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and Provided above the approved project cost. (vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster Provided are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC Provided guidelines. (ix) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Provided Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC. (x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of Provided component costs as per prescribed format.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Krishna Industrial Estate : Jewellery Park Machilipatnam (Up-gradation).

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout Yes plan Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 89.83 acres Area to be developed (acre) 46.48 acres Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 258 Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 256 0.26 - 0.5 1 1.01 – 3.0 1 Total No. of Plots 258 Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: Nil year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory 3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure As per MSE-CDP Corporation (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada. guidelines Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure -- Corporation Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres. Appraisal by SIDBI Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In- Submitted (Observations and principle approval. recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities The Jewellery Park is well connected by -- available at site. (Proximity to road, rail, sea and airport with nearest NH – railway stations / state 216 located at 1.5 km North west of the site; highways, availability of water the nearest railway station is at supply, adequate power supply, Machilipatnam (~ 5 km). The proposed telecom facilities, dwelling Machilipatnam port is located at about ~ 5 places of workers) km from the Jewellery Park. Power supply: A 33/11 KV substation is located within the Jewellery Park. Water Supply: Water is being sourced from Municipal water supply connection and also bore wells, water is being supplied through tankers drawing water from summer storage tank. Whether land is in possession Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in Received in the name of IA with Clear possession of land required for the up- Title gradation of all infrastructure facilities. Whether Zoning regulations Yes Project is for up- and non-agricultural gradation. conversion etc complied with) Whether State Level Yes, State level committee to coordinate and Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of monitor progress has been the project has been constituted. Constituted Whether confirmation received Yes. Received from IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR. -- Cost Tangible Outcomes of the The JP Machilipatnam is expected to Received project generate direct and indirect. The total direct employment is estimated to be about 450. The indirect employment is expected to be about 900. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 1350. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both Direct & in direct) for 25

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks the local people. Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in the JP, -- Machilipatnam will facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and setting up of new units in the already allotted vacant lands. Based on the existing profile of JP, Machilipatnam and discussions with the members of JP, Machilipatnam (representatives of Industrial units), an attempt has been made to quantify the expected benefits of the JP.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by Cost SIDBI/ As per by IA MSE-CDP 1. Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / 93.40 93.40 fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads (internal roads – CC) 165.75 165.75 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump 106.83 106.83 houses (v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage (Internal) 63.65 63.65 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work 105.00 105.00 including Street light etc), Generation of non- conventional energy. (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 564.63 564.63 2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 21.00 21.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation 21.00 21.00 Centre (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 35.00 35.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 21.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00 35.00 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 21.00

S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by Cost SIDBI/ As per by IA MSE-CDP Sub Total 154.00 154.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00 75.00 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 23.81 23.81 Total 817.44 817.44

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by by IA SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 640.78 572.21* (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 176.66 245.23 Total 817.44 817.44 *70% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 817.44 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park (Jewellery Park) at Machilipatnam, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 817.44 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 572.21 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 245.23 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.5: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Growth Centre at Hindupur, Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide email dated 20.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Letter for enhancement of State Government share to 30% Provided (ii) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency. Provided (iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Provided (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and Provided above the approved project cost. (vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Provided cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC Provided guidelines. (ix) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Provided Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC. (x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of Provided component costs as per prescribed format.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Ananthapur Industrial Estate : Growth Centre Hindupur (Up-gradation ).

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout Yes plan Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 391.21 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 391.21 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 279

Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 138 0.26 - 0.5 73 0.51 - 1.0 37 1.01 - 5.0 23 5.0 and above 8 Total No. of Plots 279 28

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: Nil year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Whether Zoning regulations Yes Project is for up- and non-agricultural gradation conversion etc complied with) Whether State Level Yes, State level committee to coordinate and Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of monitor progress has been the project has been constituted. Constituted Whether confirmation received Yes. Received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR. -- Cost

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Tangible Outcomes of the GC Hindupur is expected to generate both Received project direct and indirect employment. The total direct employment is estimated to be is about 300. The indirect employment expected to be created by the HGC would be about 600. Thus, the estimated total employment potential would be about 900. The proposed upgradation of infrastructure is expected to generate employment opportunities (both direct & in direct) for the local people. Justification of the Proposal The upgradation of infrastructure in Growth -- Center, Hindupur will facilitate improved functioning of existing units and would attract new units in the allotted vacant land.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommende Cost d by SIDBI/ by IA As per MSE- CDP 1. Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / fencing 81.19 81.19 (ii) Cost of laying roads (roads – CC) 239.28 239.28 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 111.08 0.00 (v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Storm Water Drainage 74.78 74.78 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work including 246.53 115.00 Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy. (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 782.86 540.25 2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 21.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00 21.00 (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 31.50 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 21.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 38.50 38.50 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 21.00 Sub Total 154.00 154.00 3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.11 20.82 Total 964.97 715.07

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 716.98 500.55* (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 247.99 214.52 Total 964.97 715.06 *70% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 715.06 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Growth Centre at Hindupur, Anantapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 715.06 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 500.55 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 214.52 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.6: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Park (Autonagar), Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide email dated 19.11.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Letter for enhancement of State Government share to 30% Provided (ii) Registered land documents in the name of implementing Agency. Provided (iii) Copy of approved layout plan. Provided (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over Provided and above the approved project cost. (vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Provided cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (viii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC Provided guidelines. (ix) APIIC, Vijayawada should consider laying of roads with Cement Provided Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Andhra Pradesh / APIIC. (x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates Provided of component costs as per prescribed format.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Andhra Pradesh District : Guntur. Industrial Estate : Autonagar, Guntur (Up-gradation)

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan Yes. Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 131.45 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 92.36 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 1424

Plot Size (acres.) No. of plots 0 - 0.25 1424 Total No. of Plots 1424 Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of Nil sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. Performance of ID projects in State Satisfactory

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation As per MSE- (IA) (APIIC) Limited, Vijayawada. CDP guidelines Track Record of the IA Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation -- Limited, an undertaking of Govt. of Andhra Pradesh, is a premier organization in the state, vested with the objective of providing industrial infrastructure through development of Industrial Parks and Special Economic Zones. Over 320 Industrial Parks have been established throughout the State, covering an extent of over 1,30,000 acres. Appraisal by SIDBI Report will be submitted to SIDBI after In-principle Submitted (Observations and approval. recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient Connectivity: The Autonagar, Guntur (Phase – IV) -- facilities available at site. Industrial Park is well connected by road, rail, sea and (Proximity to railway airport with NH – 16 abutting the IP on northern side of stations / state highways, the site; NH-71 abuts the project site on the Eastern side, availability of water the nearest airport is Gannavaram Airport ~ 50 km from supply, adequate power project site. The nearest railway station is at Guntur (~ 3 supply, telecom facilities, km). dwelling places of Power supply: A 33/11 KV substation is located within workers) the Industrial Park. Water supply: Water is being sourced from borewells connection and to OHT, water is being supplied through tankers drawing water from OHT and individual borewells of units. Whether land is in Implementing Agency (APIIC) is already in possession Submitted possession in the name of land required for the up-gradation of all infrastructure of IA with Clear Title facilities.

Whether Zoning Yes Project is for regulations and non- up-gradation. agricultural conversion etc complied with) Whether State Level Yes, State level committee to coordinate and monitor the Constituted Committee to coordinate progress of implementation of the project has been and monitor progress constituted. has been Constituted Whether confirmation Yes. Received received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of Standard Schedule of Rates – SSR. -- project Cost

Tangible Outcomes of S. Description Before After Received the project No. Implementation Implementation of ID Project of ID Project 1 No. of 666 740 Enterprises 33

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks 2 Employment 3100 4220 (Direct & Indirect) 3 Aggregate 15.61 17.35 investment by units (Rs. in crore) Justification of the The upgradation of infrastructure in the AN, Guntur will -- Proposal facilitate improved functioning of the existing units and Expansion of units in the already allotted plots. Based on the existing profile of Autonagar (AN), Guntur and discussions with the members of AN, Guntur (representatives of Industrial units), an attempt has been made to quantify the expected benefits of the AN.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended Cost by SIDBI/ As by IA per MSE-CDP 1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall / 96.61 96.61 fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads (roads – CC) 225.00 225.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump houses 127.16 0.00 (v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Storm Water Drainage 83.25 83..25 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work 236.96 236.96 including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy. (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 798.98 671.82 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative and Services Centre 21.00 0.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre 21.00 0.00 (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 31.50 0.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 21.00 0.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 35.00 0.00 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 21.00 0.00 Sub Total 150.50 0.00 3. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 28.48 20.15 Total 977.96 691.97

5. Proposed means of finance:

(Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by Recommended by SIDBI/ IA As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 718.85 484.38* (ii) Govt. of Andhra Pradesh 259.11 207.59 Total 977.96 691.97 *70.00% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 691.97 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of up-gradation of Industrial Park (Autonagar), Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.691.97 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 484.38 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 207.59 lakh. ****

Agenda No. 54.3.7: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Maritime Cluster, Verna, South Goa, Goa. Background

 Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 72nd meetings held on 16.06.2020 and committee recommended the same to place before Steering Committee for final approval.  Vide letter dated 10.07.20 & email dated 16.12.2020 MSME-DI, Goa has forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Appraisal Report of Detailed Project Report (DPR). Copy of Report Received (ii) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum Copy Received period of 30 years. (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Received (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the Received escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (v) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the To be submitted cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC Received guidelines. (vii) Details of SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act and MoA Received and AoA. (viii) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO Received (ix) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by To be submitted IA. (x) Wide publicity to be given. To be submitted (xi) Details of Shareholding Pattern of SPV as per MSE-CDP To be submitted Guidelines

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Maritime Cluster District : South Goa Location of Cluster : Verna Lok Sabha Constituency : South Goa Main Product : Bulk Carrier, Fast Patrol Boat, Life Raft and other life - saving appliances, Off Shore Vessel, Passenger Vessel, Tug.

No. of Enterprises including 121 Nos. (Micro : 64 Small :57 Medium : 0) break up (Micro, Small, Medium) : Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the Year Amount last five years : 2013-14 : 94.40 2014-15 : 99.60 2015-16 : 101.30 2016-17 : 102.10 2017-18 : 102.46

Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last Year Amount 36 five years : 2013-14 : 0.00 2014-15 : 0.00 2015-16 : 40.00 2016-17 : 30.00 2017-18 : 35.00

Employment in Cluster : Direct Employment- 2800 Indirect Employment- 6000 Technology Details : The technology used by most of the micro units is conventional, the small and large size units have installed some of the advance machines and tools. Individual units lack capacity to invest in advance design analysis software. Physical testing facility available locally have limitations and not conducive for desired industrial outputs while the NABL approved chemical testing facility is not available in Goa and the units have to send their samples out of Goa for testing. Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : Inadequate advance design facilities, advance physical testing facilities at affordable rate, training needs to fulfill skilled manpower requirement. Main Problems of Cluster : 1) Lack of advance design analysis center 2) Lack of advance physical testing facility, chemical testing not available locally 3) Lack of steel cutting facility 4) Lack of shot blasting & priming facility 5) Lack of waste disposal facility 6) Lack of skill development center Other Information : N/A

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC There is lack of advance machineries like -- steel cutting facility, shot blasting and priming, industrial waste disposal facility, plate and pipe bending machine, painting booth in the cluster units. At present physical testing facility available locally has limitations and not conducive for desired industrial output and also there is challenge with respect to timely delivery of testing report. NABL approved chemical testing facility is not available locally. Units have to send the samples to Mumbai for chemical testing. This process is time consuming and cost involved in transportation increases the cost of testing, at present there is no common facility center to offer services to the MSEs to meet the challenges of regular cost effectiveness on account of peer pressure from OEMs. The number of MSEs can avail services from CFC to strengthen their value chain analysis and deliver products at competitive rates. (b.) Location of CFC Verna Industrial Estate, South Goa, Goa -- % age of units in radius of 40 -- 5km % age of units in radius of 100 -- 10km 37

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired - Received. ii. Title is in name of NA iii. Valuation and its basis NA iv. Land is sufficient The offered land is sufficient to set up CFC. v. Change of land use NA vi. If on lease, duration of NA lease vii Whether lease is legally NA tenable (d.) Total Building area(sq mt) Proposed 9000 sq. mt. -- (e.) Rate of construction of Land Cost Rs 170.00 lakh -- building Building Cost Rs 100.00 lakhs (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Shot Blasting & priming facility --  CNC Steel Cutting machine  Plate and pipe bending and rolling machine  Advanced Design Analysis  Material and equipment testing facility  Industrial waste disposal  Painting booth (g.) Prod capacity of CFC Based on 270 working days calculated -- machinery utilization 70% for common machining and testing facility. (h.) Major Outputs/ Deliverables Particulars Before After -- of CFC, Projected performance CFC CFC of the cluster after proposed Units (in 121 171 intervention (in terms of Nos) production, export/domestic Turnover (Rs. 10246 13114 sales and direct/indirect in lakh) employment, etc.) Export (Rs. in 3500 4025 Lakh) Employment 2800 6000 nos. nos.

(i.) Pollution clearance required Yes, the pollution control board approval -- or not will be taken after allocation of land. (j.) Man Power in CFC 38 based on 70% machine utilization in -- subsequent years could be seen rise by 25 to 30%. (k.) Revenue generation 1. Year 1 at 70% capacity - INR 664.78 -- mechanism for sustainability of lakhs 2. Year 2 at 80% capacity - INR assets(service/user charges to be 759.74 lakhs 3. Year 3 at 90% capacity - levied, any other-to be INR 854.71 lakhs 4. Year 4 at 100% specified) capacity - INR 949.68 lakhs (l.) NA

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address Konkan Maritime Cluster (erstwhile --

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks Western Shipbuilding Private Limited), Shop No S-9, Ground Floor, Sapana Terraces, Swatantra Path, Vasco, South Goa, India 403802. (b.) Nature of SPV(company or Private Limited Company -- Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the state Govt. and Representative of DITC and MSME-DI Goa -- MSME officials in SPV will be nominated after tripartite agreement (d.) Date of formation of SPV 05 October 2018 -- (e.) Number of Members 36 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA Yes -- submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital Rs. 150 lakhs -- (h.) Paid up capital Rs. 2 lakhs -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Given -- (j.) Commitment letter for Given -- contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c Account No. 31466409581 -- State Bank of India, Panaji, Goa (l.) Trust Building of SPV, In progress -- Previous track record of cooperative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution Institute of Shipbuilding Technology -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by Given -- SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) (a) Power requirement for 404 KW -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water Rs. 0.96 lakhs -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Rs. 78.44 lakhs --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) Implementing Agency Khadi & Village Industries Board, Goa As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency Khadi & Village Industries Board, Goa (c.) Implementation Period 1 years (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Yet to be appraised (on account of in Appraisal report is Recommendations principal approval from GOI DPR will received. be submitted to SIDBI for appraisal) 39

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (e.) Comments of Technical - Division (f.) Approval of Technical - Recommended by Committee Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC). (h.) Working capital (In-principle NA -- sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) BEP 58.98% -- (b.) IRR, Payback period 17.92% -- (c.) DSCR - -- (d.) Return on Capital 12.93% -- employed (ROCE) (e.) NPV 613.22 -- (f.) DER - -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Base Decreasing Increasing Decreasing -- case Sales & raw production job income material cap by cost by utilization by DSCR NA NA NA NA BEP 38.12% 43.13% 38.12% 38.12% Cash 24.48% 27.70% 24.48% 24.48% BEP ROCE 33.65% 31.54% 40.39% 26.12% IRR 22.42% 17.66% 22.42% 13.83% (before tax) IRR 17.67% 13.80% 17.67% 10.74% (before tax) NPV 964.61 574.79 964.61 284.51 (before tax) NPV 561.22 269.11 561.22 51.72 (After tax)

(h.) Status of CFCs 1 CFC completed -- approved in the State

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per by SIDBI MSE-CDP 1 Land 170.00 170.00 170.00

S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per by SIDBI MSE-CDP 2 Building 100.00 100.00 100.00 3 Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 1165.00 1165.00 1165.00 4 Misc. Fixed Assets 105.00 105.00 105.00 5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 15.00 15.00 15.00 6 Contingency (2% on building & 5% on P&M) 60.25 60.25 60.25 7 Margin Money for working capital 6.32 6.32 6.32 Total Project Cost 1621.57 1621.57 1621.57

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per by SIDBI MSE-CDP 1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1200.00 1200.00 1200.00 2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Goa 150.00 150.00 150.00 3 SPV contribution 271.57 271.57 271.57 Total 1621.57 1621.57 1621.57

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh) S.. No. Description Power Requirement Cost (HP/KW) 1. Shot Blasting & Printing Plant 350 220.00 2. CNC Steel Cutting Machine with Crane 70 130.00 3. Plate & Pipe Bendign and Rolling Machine 20 550.00 4. Advance Design Analysis Software 100.00 5. Material & Equipment Testing Facility - 50.00 (a) Universal Testing Machine (b) Spectro Meter (c) Hardness Testing (d) Impact Testing Machine 6. Painting Booth - 15.00 7. Industrial Waste Disposal Plant - 100.00 Total - 1165.00

9. Observation:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:

(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (ii) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by IA. (iii) Original Copy of SIDBI Appraisal Report. (iv) Uploading of SPV members details on MSE-CDP Portal. (v) Clarification on SPV Upfront Contribution (as land is purchased at price of Rs 170.00 lakh on 7 year equal instalment payment basis) 41

(vi) Compliance of all requirements/provisions/columns of online application as per guidelines including conditions imposed by TEAC. (vii) Submission of shareholding pattern as per MSE-CDP Guidelines

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Maritime Cluster, Verna, South Goa at a total project cost of Rs.1621.57 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 1200.00 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs.150.00 lakh and SPV’s contribution of Rs. 271.57 lakh.

*********

Agenda No. 54.3.8: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Imitation Jewellery Cluster, Ahmedabad, Gujarat.

Vide email dated 23.02.2021, Joint Director, MSME-DI, Ahmedabad requested to postponed the inclusion of proposal of Imitation Jewllery Cluster, Ahmedabad in 54th National Level Steering Committee meeting to be held on 02/03/2021.

Background

 Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 71st meetings held on 06.03.2020 and recommended the same to place before Steering Committee for final approval.  Vide letter dated 18.11.20, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (EDII), Gandhinagar has forwarded the following documents submitted and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum To be period of 30 years. submitted (ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members Submitted (iii) Project Appraisal Report CED Appraised Report Submitted (iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Submitted (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Submitted (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 percent Submitted of installed capacity. (vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost Submitted escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Submitted cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be (ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC Submitted guidelines. (x) Details of SPVand MoA and AoA Submitted (xi) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO To be submitted (xii) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by To be IA. submitted

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Imitation Jewellery Cluster, Ahmedabad District : Ahmedabad Location of Cluster : 218-219 Advance Plaza, Sahibaug, Ahmedabad Lok Sabha Constituency : Ahmedabad Main Product : Imitation Jewellery Items No. of Enterprises including break up 100 (Micro : 100) (Micro, Small, Medium) :

Turnover for the last five years Year Amount (Rs in lakh) 2014-15 885 2015-16 985 2016-17 1095 2017-18 1215 2018-19 1350

Exports for the last five years No Employment in Cluster : 500 Nos. Technology Details : -Bangle CNC Engraving Machine - Para Engraving CNC Machine - Laser Cutting Machine - Laser Marking Machine - Portable VMC Machine - Turning Machine - Sizing Machine - Tools set for engraving Plant - Training Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR : Technology & Quality Up-gradation Machine for Imitation jewellery product manufacturing is being needed in purposed CFC. Main Problems of Cluster : • Old and traditional designs. • Poor quality and finishing. • Lack of technical awareness. • Artesian do not have formal training. • Wastage and rejection during Manual processes. Other Information : This is a exclusively for woman entrepreneur cluster engage in manufacturing in imitation Jewellery. The Cluster is for Training of imitation Jewellery as well as common product/process Development.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC The proposed CFC will help unit located in -- cluster in improving the quality of the product through standardization of the raw material. Generate Employment Development of new Entrepreneurs. (b.) Location of CFC 218-219 Advance Plaza, Sahibaug, -- Ahmedabad % age of units in radius of 5km 95 -- % age of units in radius of 10km 5 -- (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Registered ii. Title is in name of Jwellbuzz Imitation Foundation land lease document / iii. Valuation and its basis N.A Sale deed in iv. Land is sufficient Yes the name of SPV for a v. Change of land use No minimum vi. If on lease, duration of lease N.A period of 30

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks vii Whether lease is legally tenable N.A years is required.

(d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 1200 Sq. ft. -- (e.) Rate of construction of building N.A. -- (f.) Main Facility Proposed - Bangle CNC Engraving Machine -- - Para Engraving CNC Machine - Laser Cutting Machine - Laser Marking Machine - Portable VMC Machine - Turning Machine - Sizing Machine - Tools set for engraving Plant - Training (g.) Prod capacity of CFC 11,400 Kg -- (h.) Major Outputs/Deliverables of Particulars Before After -- CFC, Projected performance of the Intervention Intervention cluster after proposed intervention (in No. of Units 100 275 terms of production, export/domestic Production 30,000 1,10,000 sales and direct/indirect employment, in Kg. etc.) Turnover 1350 4,400 (Rs. In Lakhs) Employmen 500 1,925 t in No. Profit (Rs. 400 1,513 In Lakhs)

(i.) Pollution clearance required or not As per the notification of Gujarat Pollution -- Control Board The industries is in the list of exemption provide by GPCB. (j.) Man Power in CFC 14 Nos -- (k.) Revenue generation mechanism - -- for sustainability of assets (service/ user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Name and Address Jwellbuzz Imitation Foundation -- 218-219 Advance Plaza, Sahibaug, Ahmedabad (b.) Nature of SPV(company or Section 8 Company -- Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the state Govt. and S.S. Bhardwaj, Jt. Commissioner, Govt. -- MSME officials in SPV of Gujarat. P.B. Parmar, Dy. Director, MSME-DI, Ahmedabad (d.) Date of formation of SPV 17.02.2020 -- (e.) Number of Members 60 Nos. -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA Yes -- 45

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital Company has currently authorized -- capital of Rs. 100000/-. (h.) Paid up capital Company has Paid up capital of Rs. -- 100000/-. (i.) Shareholding Pattern Given -- (j.) Commitment letter for contribution - -- (k.) SPV specific A/c - Required (l.) Trust Building of SPV, Previous - -- track record of co-operative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution Entrepreneurship Development -- Institute of India – EDII, Gandhinagar (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV Yes -- members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) (a) Power requirement for 15 KVA -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water 1,50,000 Litres -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities Available --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Implementing Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute As per MSE- of India – EDII, Gandhinagar CDP guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India – EDII, Gandhinagar (c.) Implementation Period 12 Months (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Will be done after the In Principal Appraisal report Recommendations Approval. is received. (e.) Comments of Technical Division - -- (f.) Approval of Technical Committee - -- (g.) Comments of Cluster This is a cluster exclusively operated by -- Development Division: Micro Women entrepreneurs. if the cluster is supported the productivity as well as the quality standard of the product will improve waste will be minimize and the costing will be decreased. There is good scope for employment generation. 46

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (h.) Working capital(In-principle NA -- sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) BEP At 31.17% -- (b.) IRR, Payback period IRR @ 20.91% -- Pay Back Period comes at 4.38 Years (c.) DSCR N.A. -- (d.) Return on Capital employed 26.62% -- (ROCE) (e.) NPV NPV @ 10% Comes Rs. 265.31 Lakhs. -- (f.) DER N.A. -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis As Per Financial Report -- (h.) Status of CFCs approved in the 2 CFC completed, 10 ongoing -- State

6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per MSE- by SIDBI CDP 1 Land - - - 2 Building 50.00 50.00 50.00 3 Plant & Machinery (including electrification) 401.50 401.50 401.50 4 Misc. fixed assets 21.00 21.00 21.00 5 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 10.00 10.00 10.00 6 Contingencies (3% on TPM) 21.07 21.07 21.07 7 Margin money for working capital 10.00 10.00 10.00 Total Project Cost 513.57 513.57 513.57

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per MSE- by SIDBI CDP 1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 410.85 410.85 410.85 2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Goa 51.36 51.36 51.36 3 SPV contribution 51.36 51.36 51.36 Total 513.57 513.57 513.57

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

S. No. Name of Machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 1 Bangle CNC Engraving Machine 3 123.90

S. No. Name of Machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 2 Para Engraving CNC Machine 2 35.40 3 Laser Cutting Machine 1 17.70 4 Laser Marking Machine 3 43.40 5 Portable VMC Machine 1 23.60 6 Turning Machine 2 2.40 7 Sizing Machine 1 5.30 8 Tools set for engraving Plant 1 96.80 9 Other Supporting Machinery 1 53.00 Total 401.50

9. Observation:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:

(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum period of 30 years. (ii) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO. (iii) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by IA. (iv) Compliance of all requirements/provisions/columns of online application as per guidelines including conditions imposed by TEAC. (v) Uploading of SPV members details on MSE-CDP Portal.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may defer the proposal.

*********

Agenda No. 54.3.9: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Ayurveda Cluster, Karnal District, Haryana. Background:

(i) Proposal was recommended in the 72nd Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 16.06.2020 subject to submission of following documents prior to final approval. (ii) Vide letter dated 16.12.20, MSME-DI, Karnal forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Appraised Report of Detailed Project Received Report (DPR) (ii) Registered land document in the name of Received SPV (In case of leased premises, the lease should be legally tenable in the name of SPV, for a fairly long duration i.e. at least 15 years. In case of leased land, the lease period should be at least for a period of 30 years) (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received (iv) Drug Manufacturing License from State CFC to be setup only to manufacture Government extracts of herbs to be used for manufacturing of ayurvedic medicines. Licence for extraction of herbs would be obtained after approval and commissioning of P&M in CFC. (v) Certificate from State Government that Received more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be (vi) Commitment letter from State Government Received / SPV to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (vii) Certificate from State Government for Received compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines (viii) Certificate of incorporation of SPV in Received Section-8 of Company Act (ix) Commitment letter from SPV for their Received contribution (x) Commitment letter from SPV members to Received utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity (xi) Mandate form of Implementing Agency Required regarding project specific bank account in Schedule A Bank. (xii) Wide publicity of the project Details received.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Name of the Cluster:- Ayurveda Units Cluster, Karnal District, Haryana

2. Sector:- Ayurveda (Ayush)

3. Nature of activity:-

Classical Ayurvedic powders (Bhasma), Ayurvedic medicines (tablets, capsules, syrups, eye ear drops), allied products such as Ayurvedic ointments oils, Ayurvedic Nutraceuticals Personal care products (skin care, hair care, oral care, make-up, etc.). Some of the key players in Indian Ayurvedic market include Dabur, Baidyanath Zandu which account for around 80 of the market. In order to promote traditional systems of medicine including Ayurveda, Indian govt. has set up AYUSH ministry

4. Product / Services provided:-

Ayurvedic Powder, tablets, capsules, syrup, ointments, eye ear drops, Oils, Ayurvedic Personal Care products

5. Number of units in cluster:- 50 (Micro- 48 & Small-2)

6. Category wise unit in cluster:- Micro-48, Small-2, Women owned-2

7.. No. of SPV member units:- 24

8.. Number of cluster units agreed to join as members of the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV):- There is no ceiling on maximum number of members but should be a min. of 20 MSEs in SPV. However, in special cases where considerations of investments, technology or small size of cluster, 10 MSEs may be considered in SPV) (Micro- 22 & Small-2)

9. Proposed project cost:- (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP/ Recommended by SIDBI (i) Land 107.50 107.50 (ii) Building & other civil works 289.24 289.24 (iii) Plant & Machinery 949.93 949.93 (iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 17.00 17.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 64.57 28.54 (vi) Contingency (2% on building & 5% on Plant & 44.41 44.41 Machinery) (vii) Margin money for working capital 19.32 19.32 Total 1491.97 1455.94

10. Proposed means of finance:- (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1089.14 1034.88* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Haryana 253.63 253.63 (iii) SPV contribution 149.20 203.46 Total 1491.97 1491.97 *71.08% of eligible project cost of Rs. 1455.94 lakh. 50

11. Details of Implementing Agency / State Govt./ SPV:-

Name of IA: Bureau of Industrial Email of IA: [email protected] Policy & Promotion Name of State Govt.: Department of Email of State Govt.: Industries & Commerce, Haryana [email protected] Name of SPV & Address: Vapik Email: [email protected] Solutions, H. No. 7, Nyaypuri, Near Karan Stadium, Karnal-132001, M:- 9416030641

12. Whether share holding pattern of SPV members has been provided? {No single unit should hold more than 10 percent in the equity capital (or equivalent capital contribution) of the SPV}

S. No. Name of Unit Contribution of unit % of unit towards SPV Share share (Rs. in lakh) 1 Comex Herbal Products 2.98 2.00 2 Xieon Life Sciences Private Limited 10.44 7.00 3 Reach Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd 4.47 3.00 4 Ayushi Herbs 5.97 4.00 5 Uttam Herbals 5.97 4.00 6 Sukhija Ayurvedic Pharmacy 5.97 4.00 7 Cure Quick Herbals 2.98 2.00 8 Gourja Foods and Agro Products 5.97 4.00 9 Anant Herbal Products 8.95 6.00 10 Stallion Enterprises 10.44 7.00 11 Daksh Pharmaceuticals 5.97 4.00 12 Vet Health Pharma 5.97 4.00 13 And Pharma Co. 5.97 4.00 14 Binexo Pharmaceuticals 5.97 4.00 15 North India Life sciences Pvt. Ltd 10.44 7.00 16 Avikaa Herbs 4.47 3.00 17 Swiss Bioherbals 2.98 2.00 18 K.R Laboratory 5.97 4.00 19 PMG Healthcare 4.47 3.00 20 Sarthak Ayush and Foods 4.47 3.00 21 Liberty Drugs Gram Udyog Samiti 4.47 3.00 22 Exod Herbals 5.97 4.00 23 Sahi Pharma India Pvt. Limited 5.97 4.00 24 Onika Pharmaceuticals 7.46 5.00

11. How many cluster units, other than SPV members, are willing to utilize the services of CFC. (a) Micro (b) Small (c) Medium 22 2 00

12. Main finding and critical gap identified

Yes Absence of nearby standardized herbal extraction plant Absence of centralized Formulation Development (FD) facility Absence of Quality testing lab

13. Whether all the problems of the cluster have been addressed i.e. information on nature of critical gaps identified?

Yes The details of all the problems given in the page no. 58 and 59 of the Detailed Project Report of the Cluster. Please refer that pages.

14. Activity/Process at UNIT/CFC level SN Activity/Process at unit level Activity/Process at CFC level One of the key problems that Ayurveda units Setting up of an herbal extraction plant in in Karnal face is the availability of Karnal will lead to easy availability of 1 standardized quality raw materials APIs with standardized raw materials to Ayurveda units assured delivery timelines. Currently Karnal in Karnal and nearby districts. Standardized Ayurveda Units procure herb raw materials will help for There is an absence of quality testing lab for Setting up of a Quality Control Lab cum RD testing of raw material finished products. Centre will help to ensure a certain level of 2 Several laws governing the pharma industry standardization and also provide RD facilities require various tests to be conducted by the for new formulations development by pharma units. The units Ayurveda units in Karnal and

15. Is there any possibility with the proposed machinery to perform complete activities to manufacture a product (some activities are supposed to be performed at CFC level as well as Unit level, in such a case it would be a complete and independent manufacturing unit and cannot be a part of CFC). No

16. Tangible outcomes (No. of unit, Employment Turnover & Export) Description Before Intervention of CFC After Intervention of CFC No. of cluster units (Numbers) 50 80 Cluster Turnover (Rs. in crore) 50 100 Employment (Numbers) 2500 4500 Export (Rs. in lakh) 0 20

17. Is there any proposed activity for CFC which is being performed in cluster units? If yes, how many units are there and what is its production capacity (with due justification)? No

18. Is there any adverse effect on existing cluster units due to proposed CFC? If yes, up to what extant? No

19. Whether the proposed activities in CFC are technically feasible and viable? Backward linkages (like raw material availability etc.) and forward linkages (gap between production capacity of the cluster and particular proposed activity of CFC) may be judged. Yes

20. Whether proposed machinery for CFC is advanced (at present) and adequate to fulfill the existing & near future needs of the cluster? Yes

21. Whether SPV members will be able to utilize 60% of proposed production capacity of CFC (justification if necessary)? Yes

22. Whether similar facilities (as proposed) are available in public or private sector in nearby area? No

23. Whether Technical viability, user charges and cost of machinery are ascertained? Yes

24. Proposed faculties:  Herbal Extraction Plant  In-process quality control lab cum R&D centre 25. List of Plant & Machinery

(a) Primary Machines:

S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) A.1 First Phase Grinding & Crushing of Herbs 1 Herbs Washing Machine 1 3.80 2 RM Grinder (Pre-Crusher) 1 9.20 3 RM Grinder (Pre-Crusher) 1 6.80 A.2 Extraction 4 Rotary Extractor 2 40.00 5 Vertical Extractor 3 40.00 6 Vertical Extractor 4 50.00 7 Vertical Extractor 4 30.00

S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 8 Open Extractor 2 10.00 9 Open Extractor 2 9.00 A.3 Concentration (Distillation) 10 Reactor 2 28.00 11 Reactor 2 25.00 12 Reactor 3 30.00 13 Reactor 2 16.00 14 Callandria Unit 2 25.00 15 Distillation Vessel 1 11.20 16 Distillation Vessel 2 11.20 A.4 Accessories for Extractors & Reactors 17 Condenser 4 17.00 18 Condenser 6 21.00 19 Condenser 6 19.00 20 Condenser 6 17.00 21 Vacuum Receivers- 20 23.00 22 Vacuum Receiver - 2 4.50 23 Transfer Pumps 10 6.00 A.5 Sedimentation & Day Storage 24 Settling Tank 4 12.60 25 Settling Tank 2 4.20 26 Day Storage Tank 2 11.20 A.6 Filtration 27 Centrifuge 1 8.40 28 Centrifuge 1 7.40 29 Filter Press 1 3.80 30 Filter Press 1 6.50 A.7 Drying Section 31 Rotary Vacuum Padle Dryer 1 22.00 32 Tray Dryer 1 7.00 33 Spray Dryer with structure 1 40.00 34 Nutch Filters 1 1.40 35 Nutch Filters 1 1.90 A.8 Solvent Storage Section 31 Horizontal Underground Storage Tank 2 12.50 32 Horizontal Underground Storage Tank 1 5.00 A.9 Final Processing 33 Ribbon Blender 1 4.50 34 Double Cone Blender 1 8.00 35 Multi Mill 1 2.00 36 Vibro Sifter 1 1.40 37 Vibro Sifter 1 1.10

S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 38 Impact Pulveriser 1 10.50 Total 624.10 Add: Packing/Transportation @ 1.5% of base price 7.93 Grand Total 632.03

(b) Secondary Machines:

S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 1 Steam Boiler with Chimney 3TPH 1 48 3 RO Plant (2000 LPH) 1 8.50 4 ETP Plant 1 13.00 5 Cooling Tower (250 TR) 1 6.50 6 Pipelines for Utilities 30.00 7 Vacuum Pump (10HP) 2 4.20 8 Mini Workshop for Maintenance (Lathe Machine, Driller, Tools, 1 9.11 Welding Set) 9 Pilot Plant for R&D (2*500 L) 2 30 10 DG Set 125 KV 2 15.00 11 Weighing Machine 1 8.00 12 Batch Coding Machine 1 3.00 13 Powder Pouch Packing Machine 1 5.00 14 Liquid Pouch Packing Machine 1 4.50 15 Weigh Balance (500 KG) 1 0.40 16 Weigh Balance (300 KG) 1 0.40 17 Weigh Balance (100 KG) 2 0.20 18 SS/MS Racks 50 9.00 19 Platforms for entire plant 26.90 20 Computers 4 1.2 21 Office Aluminium Panels 5.81 22 Lift for first floor for material 10.05 23 Cargo lift with small tractor 9.55 Total 248.31 Add: Packing/Transportation @ 1.5% of base price (except Computers) 2.82 Grand Total 251.13 (c) Lab Equipments:

S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 1 UV Spectrophotometer Double Beam 1 5.90 2 Polari meter 1 0.48 3 Refractometer 1 0.27 4 TLC Kit 1 0.32 5 Hot Air Owen 1 0.44 6 Muffle Furnace 1200 Degrees 1 0.38

S. No. Name of the machinery Qty Amount (Rs. in lakh) 7 Round Bottom Flask 1 0.01 8 Heating Mental 1 0.04 9 Heating Mental 1 0.03 10 Digital Water Bath 1 0.27 11 Melting Point Apparatus 1 0.20 12 Vortex Shaker 1 0.24 13 Desiccator Borosil 1 0.18 14 Mono Quartz Water Distillation Unit 1 0.55 15 Laboratory Glass Dryer 1 0.32 16 Microprocessor Conductivity TDS meter 1 0.27 17 T.D.S. Meter PEN type 1 0.05 18 Alcohol meter 1 0.06 19 Test Sieve Standard Size 1 0.03 20 Test Sieve Standard Size 1 0.03 21 Test Sieve Standard Size 1 0.03 22 Magnetic Stirrer with Hot Plate 1 0.12 23 T.L.C. Plate (Merck) 1 0.06 24 Whitman Filter Paper 1 0.01 25 Ordinary Filter Paper 1 0.00 26 Thermometer 1 0.01 27 Thermometer 1 0.01 28 Incubator Bacteriological SS Chamber Inside 1 0.41 29 BOD Incubator 1 0.65 30 Microscope Binocular 1 0.27 31 Autoclave Vertical 1 0.38 32 Vacuum Oven 1 0.33 33 Stability Chamber 1 4.37 34 Lab Glass ware 1 2.66 35 Lab Furniture with Centre Table and PVC 1 3.25 Sink Fitting with electric fitting 36 Lab Chemicals 1 2.66 37 TRACE GC 1110 Main Frame 230V 1 10.27 38 HPLC with Auto sampler and UV Detector 1 24.49 Total 60.00 Add: Packing/Transportation @ 1.5% of base price 0.76 Grand Total 60.76

Total Plant & Machinery Cost

S. No. Particulars Price (Rs. in lakh) 1. Primary Machines 624.10 2. Secondary Machines 248.31 3. Lab Equipment 60.00

S. No. Particulars Price (Rs. in lakh) 4. Packing & Transportation 11.52 5. Erection & Commissioning 6.00 Total 949.93

25. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Drug Manufacturing License from State Government (ii) Mandate form of Implementing Agency regarding project specific bank account in Schedule A Bank

26. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Ayurveda Cluster, Karnal District, Haryana at a total project cost of Rs. 1491.97 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1034.88 lakh, Government of Haryana contribution of Rs. 253.63 lakh and SPV’s contribution of Rs. 203.46 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.10: Proposal for Final approval for upgradation of Industrial Estate (Rubber Park) at Irapuram, District - Ernakulam, Kerala.

Background

(i) Proposal was recommended by the 71st Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 11.11.20, Managing Director, Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) English version of registered land documents in the name of Received. Implementing Agency vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur. (ii) Copy of approved layout plan Received. (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received. (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over Received. and above the approved project cost (v) Status of completed ID Projects in the State and details of operating Received. units in the Rubber Park project in prescribed format. (vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC Received. guidelines. (vii) IA should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete with proper Document drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for awaited. relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Kerala / KINFRA. (viii) Economic Viability Report on the proposal from MSME-DI Received. (ix) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share. Document awaited. (x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of Received. component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (KINFRA). State : Kerala District : Ernakulam Industrial Estate : Up-gradation of Infrastructure Facilities (Rubber Park)

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved Yes. layout plan Total Area of industrial estate/ area 110 acres (acre) 58

Particulars Description Area to be developed (acre) 76.01 acres Number and sizes of plots to be Total 42 plots have been allotted to units. Out of developed which 38 units are operational in the area. Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same Nil district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State Infrastructure Development (ID) Projects: Completed Projects: 08 On-going Projects:03

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Kerala Industrial Infrastructure As per MSE-CDP Development Corporation (KINFRA), guidelines. Thiruvananthapuram. Track Record of the IA KINFRA has pioneered the concept of -- Theme-Based Industrial Parks in Kerala for kick-starting development, particularly in industrial sectors where the state has an edge by way of natural and human resources. This resulted in a significant contribution to inculcate an industry culture and encouraged many leading industries to set up their factories and manufacturing facilities in KINFRA parks. It has created the much needed impetus for the industrial promotion in Kerala. KINFRA has established 22 well-defined industrial parks spread across around 3000 acres of land and several new projects are in the launching phase. Each of these Parks offers comprehensive infrastructure and support services to the clients. Appraisal by SIDBI Submitted. Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities Yes. The site of existing industrial area is -- available at site. (Proximity well connected with major roads: 6 kms to to railway stations / state SH 1, 4 kms to SH 41, 10 kms to NH 49 highways, availability of and 25 kms to NH 66. The park is 20 kms water supply, adequate power away from Kochi international Airport and supply, telecom facilities, Aluva Railway station and 35 kms away dwelling places of workers) from the Kochi Port. There is adequate supply of water and power and telecom facilities are also available. Whether land is in possession The IA has submitted the copy of land Received. in the name of IA with Clear patta certifying that the land is under Title possession of KINFRA. 59

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Whether Zoning regulations Existing Industrial Estate. and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with) Whether State Level Yes Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted Whether confirmation - Received. received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project KINFRA has certify that the estimate Received. Cost prepared for the upgradation of facilities at Rubber Park India Pvt., Irapuram (a joint venture of KINFRA and Rubber board of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry) is prepared as per CPWD guidelines. Tangible Outcomes of the Particulars Present status Expected Outcome project No. of units 42 (39 MSME Increase in 14-18 rubber based units) MSME units & Capacity enhancement of existing units. Employment 600 Increase in 300-400 employees.

Justification of the Proposal The proposed project is for development of -- existing industrial area at Rubber park, Irapuram, District – Ernakulam. The basic infrastructure facilities were completed in 2003, but the infrastructure has deteriorated with time. The roads are in poor condition, there is inadequate water supply, lack of storm drains, inadequate common ETP plant, poor street lighting and outdated testing and certification centre. Accordingly, road strengthening, street lighting upgradation, common ETP augmentation, water supply augmentation and upgradation of testing & certification centre are envisaged in the project.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Revised project As per MSE-CDP Cost by IA as per / Recommended SIDBI appraisal by SIDBI 1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling / leveling / including boundary 0.00 0.00 wall / fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads 293.61 293.61 (iii) Roadside greenery and social forestry 0.00 0.00

S.No. Particulars Revised project As per MSE-CDP Cost by IA as per / Recommended SIDBI appraisal by SIDBI (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks & pump 262.00 262.00 house. (v) Water harvesting 0.00 0.00 (vi) Drainage (internal) 0.00 0.00 (vii) Power (Substation & distribution network 67.39 67.39 including streetlight etc.). Generation of non- conventional energy (viii) Others (sanitary conveniences etc.) (upgradation 0.00 0.00 of infrastructure) Sub Total 623.00 623.00 2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 0.00 0.00 (ii) Telecommunication / Cyber Centre / 43.00 43.00 Documentation Centre (iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Centre 0.00 0.00 (iv) Bank / Post Office 0.00 0.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, marketing outlets 0.00 0.00 (vi) First Aid, crèche, canteen etc. 0.00 0.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 305.00 305.00 4. Contingencies & Preoperative Expenses 0.00 0.00 Total 971.00 971.00

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Percentage As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 60.00 582.60 (ii) Implementing Agency 40.00 388.40 Total 100.00 971.00

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for Final approval for upgradation of Industrial Estate (Rubber Park) at Irapuram, District - Ernakulam, Kerala at a total project cost of Rs. 971.00 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 582.60 lakh & Implementing Agency of Rs. 388.40 lakh . .

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.11: Proposal for final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Engineering Cluster, Govindpura, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th SCM held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of following documents prior to final approval.

 Vide letters dated 26.06.19, 16.10.19 & 02.12.19, Government of Madhya Pradesh submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV. Provided (ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report of revised DPR with plant and machinery as Provided recommended by Technical Committee, to be vetted by MSME-DI, Indore before SIDBI appraisal. (iii) List of share holding pattern of SPV members. Provided (iv) Details of SPV's Bank account. Not submitted (v) Commitment letter from SPV for contribution of its share. Provided (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilize at least 60 percent of Provided installed capacity. (vii) Details of production capacity of cluster. Provided (viii) Details of Major Outputs / Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance Provided of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export / domestic sales and direct / indirect employment etc.). (ix) NOC from Pollution Control Board. Not submitted (x) Details of Revenue generation mechanism. Provided (xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC Provided guidelines.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster Name of Cluster: Engineering Cluster District: Bhopal Location of Cluster: Bhopal Lok Sabha Constituency: Bhopal Main Product: Fabricated and Precision Machined Components No. of Enterprises including break up Micro 10

(Micro, Small, Medium): Small 32 Turnover for the last five years 2016-17 4.158 (Rs in Crore): 2017-18 5.94 2018-19 6.72 2019-20 7.46 2020-21 8.53

Exports for the last five years Nil (Rs in Crore): Employment in Cluster: 3000 Technology Details: Upgrading the production technology at a moderate speed Whether DS Conducted: Yes Main findings of DSR: Diagnostics study proposes setting up of common facility 62

center in terms of high end design and development/training center and production cum training center apart from a row material bank and a test lab. Main Problems of Cluster: Gaps as per chart Other Information: Executive summary

2. Information about Proposed CFC Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) Justification for CFC Cluster Map -- (b.) Location of CFC Govindpura Industrial Area Bhopal -- % age of units in radius of 80 -- 5km % age of units in radius of 60 -- 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired M.P. Govt. allotted as their Received contribution ii. Title is in name of Govindpura Engineering Cluster iii. Valuation and its basis 1.5 crores as per collector guideline iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use Not required at Industrial Area vi. If on lease, duration of Yes, 30 years lease vii Whether lease is legally Yes tenable (d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 13774.50 sq ft -- (e.) Rate of construction of 1000 per sq ft aprox -- building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Machining facility --  Test lab  Training facilities  Raw material bank (g.) Prod capacity of CFC 1,75,80,000/- per annum Received (h.) Major 4,15,80,000/- per annum Received Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Projected performance of the cluster after proposed intervention (in terms of production, export/domestic sales and direct/indirect employment etc.) (i.) Pollution clearance N/A Required required or not (j.) Man Power in CFC 21 -- (k.) Revenue generation As per commercial analysis Received mechanism for sustainability of assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified) 63

3. Information about SPV Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) Name and Address Govindpura Engineering Cluster -- Foundation, Govindpura Industries Association Complex, Ground Floor, Industrial Area, Govindpura Bhopal M.P. 462023 (b.) Nature of SPV(company Company -- or Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the state Govt. 1. Industries Commissioner -- and MSME officials in SPV 2. Director, msme, Indore (d.) Date of formation of SPV 12.09.2012 -- (e.) Number of Members 43 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and Yes -- AOA submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital 1,00,000/- -- (h.) Paid up capital as 1,00,000/- -- on...... (i.) Shareholding Pattern Submitted Received (j.) Commitment letter for Submitted Received contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c 7184002100000304 Required (l.) Trust Building of SPV, -- -- Previous track record of cooperative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution -- -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by Submitted Received SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity.

(o.) (a) Power requirement for 150 KWA -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water 20,000 liters -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities 20 liters oil --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) Implementing Agency M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency Bhopal (c.) Implementation Period 2 years -- (d.) Appraisal of DPR and Submitted Submitted main Recommendations (e.) Comments of Technical Technical Committee of MSE-CDP in its meeting held on Division 13.07.18 recommended the proposal. (f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster -- -- Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In- -- -- principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) BEP 31% As per SIDBI, 50.36% (b.) IRR, Payback period 10.02% As per SIDBI, 11.72% (c.) DSCR 3.83 As per SIDBI, 4.41 (d.) Return on Capital 12.38 As per SIDBI, 26.59% employed (ROCE) (e.) NPV 10% As per SIDBI , 750.80 (+NPV) (f.) DER 0.13 -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Enclosed -- (h.) Status of CFCs approved 02 CFCs approved and under implementation under MSE-CDP. in the State

6. Proposed project cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by Recommended by IA SIDBI/MSE-CDP (i) Land and its Development 150.00 150.00 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 250.00 250.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 980.00 980.00 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 75.00 60.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 10.00 10.00 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant and 34.40 61.00 machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 51.69 20.10 Total 1551.09 1531.10 65

7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by by IA SIDBI/MSE-CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1045.00 1017.00 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of M.P. 150.00 150.00 (iii) SPV contribution 176.09 184.10 (iv) Bank Loan/others 180.00 180.00 Total 1551.09 1531.10

8. Plant & Machinery:- (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Name of the Qty. Rate Total Taxes Total Machinery Amount Amount A. Training Center Machineries 1 Asada Bend SAW Beaver 1 190,500 190,500 27,623 218,123 2 Chain Pipe Wrench 1 3,100 3,100 450 3,550 Forged 3 ID Cold Pipe Beveling 1 333,000 333,000 48,285 381,285 Machine 4 Hydraulic Pipe 1 13,600 13,600 1,972 15,572 Bender with 5 Portable 1 45,000 45,000 6,525 51,525 Reinforcement 6 Power Tube Notcher 1 150,000 150,000 21,750 171,750 7 Tapping Machine 1 18,200 18,200 2,639 20,839 8 Hydraulic Hand Pallet 1 29,500 29,500 4,278 33,778 Truck 9 Hydraulic Crimping 1 22,799 22,799 3,306 26,105 Piler 10 Polisher/Waxer 1 4,299 4,299 623 4,922 11 CNC Wire Cut 1 2,072,000 2,072,000 300,440 2,372,440 EDM Machine 12 JV 45 Vertical 1 4,213,000 4,213,000 610,885 4,823,885 Machining Centre Complete with 13 SMAW 4 60,000 240,000 34,800 274,800 14 SMAW 4 25,000 100,000 14,500 114,500 15 GTAW 2 150,000 300,000 43,500 343,500 16 GMAW 2 139,000 278,000 40,310 318,310 17 GMAW 3 80,000 240,000 34,800 274,800 18 SAW 1 370,000 370,000 53,650 423,650 19 Hypertherm 1 303,000 303,000 43,935 346,935 machine plasma 20 Fumes extraction 1 525,000 525,000 76,125 601,125 system complete 21 Arc welding booth 3 100,000 300,000 43,500 343,500 with all 22 Gas welding booth 3 100,000 300,000 43,500 343,500 with all accessories 23 Welding transformer 5 14,800 74,000 10,730 84,730 24 Fire extinguishers 4 4,950 19,800 2,871 22,671 25 Messer Germany 1 4,848 4,848 703 5,551 make proficut cutting torch with 26 Messer Germany 1 1,170 1,170 170 1,340 66

S. No. Name of the Qty. Rate Total Taxes Total Machinery Amount Amount make gas mixing curved gauging 27 Messer Germany make 1 1,170 1,170 170 1,340 gas mixing straight 28 Heavy duty cylinder pressure 1 5,299 5,299 768 6,067 regulator with outlet single 29 Tronado 300 regulator - 1 16,390 16,390 2,377 18,767 high flow 0-250m3/hr.20 30 Regulator end DGN 1 2,399 2,399 348 2,747 fulelH 31 Torch end GG fule 1 1,499 1,499 217 1,716 GLH 32 Starlight 1302 MB handle 1 11,998 11,998 1,740 13,738 multipurpose , heating insert for above handle HF 33 Star heating torch star handle 1 15,498 15,498 2,247 17,745 with heating insert 34 Gas economizer it 1 9,990 9,990 1,449 11,439 discontinues the supply of oxygen and fule gas to the torch is placed on the hook during the interval between operation the flame does not require re- setting on resuming operation 35 Product machine with 1 1 108,240 108,240 15,695 123,935 injector cutting torch for gas acetylene with circle cutting attachment& rail track with interlocking section, length 1200 36 Airtherm LPG 1 5,300 5,300 769 6,069 heating torch 37 Electrode holder 25 285 7,125 1,033 8,158 38 Cable connector 500 50 462 23,100 3,350 26,450 amp 39 Earth clamp 400amp 25 183 4,575 663 5,238 40 Chipping hammer 280mm 30 300 9,000 1,305 10,305 length chipping hammer with wire brush 41 Welding gloves 10 243 2,430 352 2,782 80821303 42 Single Girder EOT crane 2 689480 1378960 389556 1768516 make "MDI" Set Complete with "MDI" make Wire Rope Electric Hoist cap. 10 Ton x 6 Meter lift Capacity 10 Ton x 15 Meter Span x 6 Meter Heigth of Lift 43 Single Girder EOT crane 2 543330 1086660 306980 1393640 make "MDI" Set Complete with "MDI" make Wire Rope Electric Hoist cap. 5 Ton x 6 Meter lift Capacity 5 Ton x 15 Meter Span x B. CNC Processing Center Machineries

S. No. Name of the Qty. Rate Total Taxes Total Machinery Amount Amount 1 CNC Terrablade 1 2,090,000 2,090,000 303,050 2,393,050 2 Cnc laser cutting 1 37,396,32 37,396,320 0 37,396,320 machine 0 3 Pinacho 1 824,528 824,528 0 824,528 conventional lathe machine 4 Sipcon coordinate 1 3,300,000 3,300,000 0 3,300,000 measuring machine* 5 Argo make vertical 1 672,032 672,032 0 672,032 turret milling machine 6 Sipcon profile 1 686,500 686,500 0 686,500 projector 7 Sipoc vision 1 904,250 904,250 0 904,250 measuring system 8 3D CNC co-ordinate 1 5,027,700 5,027,700 0 5,027,700 measuring machine* 9 Accucraft 500 pro 1 456,000 456,000 9,120 465,120 rapid prototyping machine 10 Robot Welding 1 6,112,610 6,112,610 886,328 6,998,938 C. Testing Lab Machineries 1 Fine Make Computerised 1 932,000 932,000 18,640 950,640 Universal Testing Machine With Front Open 2 Fine Make Computerised 1 1,142,000 1,142,000 22,840 1,164,840 Universal Testing Machine With Front Open 3 Digital Display 1 751,600 751,600 15,032 766,632 Microhardness 4 Digital Rockwell Cum 1 206,000 206,000 4,120 210,120 Brinell 5 Vickers Cum Brinell 1 208,000 208,000 4,160 212,160 Hardness 6 Computerized Brinell 1 462,000 462,000 9,240 471,240 Hardness Testing Machine 7 Impact Testing 1 128,000 128,000 2,560 130,560 Machine 8 Astm Impact Testing 1 252,400 252,400 5,048 257,448 Machine 9 Belec Lab 3000c 1 1,818,045 1,818,045 36,361 1,854,406 10 Option Sub Program 1 44,671 44,671 893 45,565 11 Additional Base Module ;3 1 422,413 422,413 8,448 430,861 Ci,Ai,Cu@1970 Ea. 12 Special Spark 1 95,204 95,204 1,904 97,108 Generator 13 Extra Element Channel 1 53,606 53,606 1,072 54,678 14 Special Optic To Analyse 1 321,634 321,634 6,433 328,067 Nitrogen Leb3000c(From .05%) 15 Special Optic To 1 607,531 607,531 12,151 619,682 Analyse Nitrogen Leb3000c(From 0.002%) 16 Automatic Argon Shu- Off 1 32,163 32,163 643 32,807 System 17 X-RAY PLATING 1 2,533,268 2,533,268 50,665 2,583,934 THINKNESS MEASURING INS. 68

S. No. Name of the Qty. Rate Total Taxes Total Machinery Amount Amount 18 Salt Spray/ Corrosion 1 736,875 736,875 14,738 751,613 Test Chamber D. LIST OF SOFTWARES 1 Siemens Solid 10 30,000 300,000 43,500 343,500 Edge Academic Bundle 2 Siemens Nx 6 225,000 1,350,000 195,750 1,545,750 Academic Bundle 3 Siemens Nx Cam Express 10 50,000 500,000 72,500 572,500 Academic 4 Altair Hyperworks 6 200,000 1,200,000 174,000 1,374,000 (Hypermesh, Hyperform) 3,350,000 485,750 3,835,750 Insurance @ 1% of E 885078 Freight cost @ 2% of E 1770156 PACKING / FORWARDING CHARGES @ ...... 0.2% 177015 INSTALLATION , ERECTION AND COMMISIONING M/C @ 7.5% 6638091 Total Estimated project cost of Plant and Machineries with all 97978223 compliances charges Say

9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:

(i) Details of SPV’s Bank account. (ii) NOC from Pollution Control Board. (iii) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Engineering Cluster, Govindpura, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1531.10 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1017.00 lakh, State Government contribution of Rs.150.00 lakh, SPV contribution of Rs. 184.10 lakh & Bank loan of Rs. 180.00 lakh.

Agenda No. 54.3.12: Proposal for final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Sanawad District Khargaone, Madhya Pradesh.

Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 47th Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide letter dated 16.06.20, Directorate of Industries, Government of Madhya Pradesh forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (ii) Copy of approved layout plan signed by Competent Provided Authority. (iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned. (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost escalation, if Provided any, over and above the approved project cost. (v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per format Provided to be provided by Office of DC (MSME). (vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of Provided GFR/CVC guidelines.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd State : : Madhya Pradesh District : : Khargaone (W.N.) Industrial Estate : : Agro Based Cluster Sanawad District Khargone

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved No layout plan Total Area of Industrial Estate (acre) 22.30 Area to be developed (acre) 18.58 Number and sizes of plots to be developed 67 plots of assorted sizes

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same No Projects district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) Implementing Agency (IA) MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, -- Indore Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) -- is a Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector. Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal has been sought and -- (Observations and will be submitted after in-principal recommendations). Attach approval of the proposal SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities The proposed site is situated on State -- available at site. (Proximity to Highway railway stations / state No. 27 in Sanawad. Sanawad is a highways, availability of water town in supply, adequate power supply, Khargone District telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers) Whether land is in possession in Land is under possession of MSME Vide letter dated the name of IA with Clear Title Department. The layout plan has been 04.07.20, Industries prepared and shall be provided once Commissioner, approved. informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of Whether Zoning regulations Yes MSME, GoMP and and non-agricultural conversion possession of land to etc complied with) MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned. Whether State Level Committee The State has already implemented Constituted to coordinate and monitor similar ID progress has been Constituted projects in the past and has all the monitoring institutions in place Whether confirmation received IA has already provisioned -- form IA that it will meet the investment cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project As per MSE-CDP guidelines -- Cost

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) Tangible Outcomes of the Infrastructure development for ago -- project based cluster in Sanawad dist. Khargone Justification of the Proposal Khargone is one of the major agro -- producing districts of Madhya Pradesh. Agro Product & food product recorded positive growth. There is a new demand by the agro industries for infrastructure which is being proposed.

4. Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Estimated Recommended by SIDBI/ by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Land filling/levelling including boundary 99.00 99.00 wall and fencing (ii) Laying roads 220.00 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery and social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and 85.32 85.32 pump houses (v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage 60.00 60.00 (vii) Power distribution, Street light 229.74 229.74 arrangements, etc. (viii) Other (Sanitary convenience etc) 10.00 10.00 (ix) Administrative and Other Services Complex, 61.71 61.71 Telecommunication/cyber/document center/conference hall/exhibition hall (x) Bank/Post Office 18.00 18.00 (xi) Raw material storage/marketing outlet 44.00 40.00 (xii) First aid center, crèche, canteen 18.00 18.00 (xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00 (xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 23.06 20.00 Total 968.83 941.77

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by by IA SIDBI/ As per MSE- CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP: 565.06 565.06 (ii) State Government 313.77 313.77 72

S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by by IA SIDBI/ As per MSE- CDP (iii) Equity from MPLUN 90.00 90.00 Total 968.83 968.83 *60% of total project cost i.e. Rs. 941.77 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval.

(i) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Sanawad, District Khargaone, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 968.83 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 565.06 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs. 313.77 lakh and MPLUN contribution of Rs.90.00 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.13: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Kachnaria Village, Tehsil Biaora, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 47th meeting of Steering Committee held on 25.07.18, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 06.0620, Directorate of Industries, Government of Madhya Pradesh has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI appraisal report. Provided. (ii) Approved Layout Plan signed by Competent Provided. Authority. (iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Agency. Industries Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned. (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost Provided. escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (v) Status of completed ID projects in the State as per Provided. format to be provided by Office of DC(MSME). (vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance Provided. of GFR/ CVC guidelines.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd State : Madhya Pradesh District : Rajgarh Industrial Estate : Food Processing Industrial Cluster at Kachnaria, Rajgarh

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved Yes. layout plan Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 49.48 Area to be developed (acre) 17.32 Number and sizes of plots to be developed 59 new industrial plots of various sizes. 74

Particulars Description Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same No projects district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) MPLUN Ltd, Bhopal Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a -- Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector. Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal report submitted. Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report Whether sufficient facilities The proposed site is 5 Km. away from the -- available at site. (Proximity to Biaora town and well connected with railway stations / state National Highway Road No. 3. highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers) Whether land is in possession Land is under possession of DTIC Rajgarh. Vide letter dated in the name of IA with Clear 04.07.20, Industries Title Commissioner, informed that land Whether Zoning regulations Yes is in possession of and non-agricultural Dept. Of MSME, conversion etc complied with GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned. Whether State Level The State has already implemented similar Constituted Committee to coordinate and ID projects in the past and has all the monitor progress has been monitoring institutions in place Constituted Whether confirmation IA has already provisioned investment Provided. received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Cost estimates have been signed by General --

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Cost Manager (E&C) of H.O. M. P. Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, Bhopal on the basis of component-wise project cost. Tangible Outcomes of the Infrastructure for new industrial area -- project Justification of the Proposal Rajgarh is one of the major food producing -- districts of Madhya Pradesh. There is a new demand by the food industries for infrastructure which is being proposed.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP / by IA Recommended by SIDBI 1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of Site Development and Land 91.86 91.86 Filling / Levelling / Boundary wall (ii) Cost of laying roads 200.00 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery and social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, 110.45 110.00 and pump houses and tube wells (v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage 60.00 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net- 226.98 226.98 work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy. (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 10.00 10.00 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building / Incubation centre building 69.96 69.96 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation Centre (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre (iv) Bank/ Post Office 18.00 18.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing 44.00 40.00 outlets `

S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP / by IA Recommended by SIDBI (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen 18.00 18.00 facilities 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 22.96 20.00 Total 972.21 964.80

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 578.88 578.88* (ii) Grant from State Government 356.33 356.33 (iii) Equity from MPLUN 37.00 37.00 Total 972.21 972.21 * GoI grant of Rs. 578.88 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost of Rs.964.80 lakh

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency i.e. M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd., Bhopal with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non- agricultural conversion etc.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Kachnaria Village, Tehsil Biaora, District Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 972.21 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 578.88 lakh and equity from MPLUN is Rs. 37.00 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.14: Proposal for final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Choradongari Village, District Betul, Madhya Pradesh Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 47th Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide letter dated 06.06.20, Directorate of Industries, Government of Madhya Pradesh forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd State : Madhya Pradesh District : Betul Industrial Estate : Electrical and Mechanical Cluster at Chordongari, Betul

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan No Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 18.38 78

Particulars Description Area to be developed (acre) 15.22 Number and sizes of plots to be developed 70 of assorted size Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of No Projects sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation.

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) Implementing Agency (IA) MP Laghu Udyog Ltd, Bhopal -- Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year -- 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector. Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal has been sought and Received. (Observations and will be submitted after in-principal recommendations). Attach approval SIDBI report Whether sufficient facilities Choradongri village, Ghoradongri, -- available at site. (Proximity to Betul and well railway stations / state highways, connected with National Highway availability of water supply, No.59 adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers) Whether land is in possession in Land is under possession of DTIC Land document in the the name of IA with Clear Title Betul name of Implementing Agency Whether Zoning regulations and Yes (already converted industrial is required non-agricultural conversion etc land) complied with) Whether State Level Committee The State has already implemented Constituted to coordinate and monitor similar ID progress has been Constituted projects in the past and has all the monitoring

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) institutions in place Whether confirmation received IA has already provisioned Received. form IA that it will meet the cost investment in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Cost As per MSE-CDP guidelines -- Tangible Outcomes of the Industrial development for electrical -- project and mechanical engineering cluster Justification of the Proposal The proposed area is well known by -- the presence of two of the biggest industries in Madhya Pradesh: a Thermal Power Plant which has the capacity of 4000 MW and is considered to be one of the biggest plant in Madhya Pradesh and Western Coal Field which is also situated within the proximity of the proposed site.

4. Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Revised Recommended by SIDBI/ Estimated by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Land filling/levelling including 100.00 100.00 boundary wall and fencing: (ii) Road side greenery and social forestry 10.00 10.00 (iii) Laying roads 220.00 200.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, 104.21 104.21 and pump houses (v) Water harvesting 10.00 10.00 (vi) Drainage 60.00 60.00 (vii) Power distribution, Street light 236.16 236.16 arrangements, etc. (viii) Other (Sanitary convenience etc) 10.00 10.00 (ix) Administrative and Other Services 69.50 69.50 Complex, Telecommunication/cyber/document center/conference hall/exhibition hall 80

S. No. Particulars Revised Recommended by SIDBI/ Estimated by IA As per MSE-CDP (x) Bank/Post Office 18.00 18.00 (xi) Raw material storage/marketing outlet 44.00 40.00 (xii) First aid center, crèche, canteen 18.00 18.00 (xiii) Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.00 80.00 (xiv) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 23.90 20.00 : Total 1003.77 975.87

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 600.00 585.52* (ii) Grant from State Government 400.00 291.68 (iii) Equity from MPLUN 126.57 126.57 Total 1126.57 1003.77 * GoI grant of Rs. 585.52 lakh is 58.55% of total eligible project cost of Rs.1000.00 lakh

6. Observations:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval.

(i) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Choradongari Village, District Betul, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs.1003.77 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs.585.52 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs.291.68 lakh and MPLUN contribution of Rs.126.57 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.15: Proposal for final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Akodi Village, Teh Waraseoni, District Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh.

Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 47th Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 25.07.18 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide letter dated 06.06.20 & email dated 18.12.20, Government of Madhya Pradesh forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI appraisal report Provided (ii) Approved Layout Plan signed by Competent Provided Authority (iii) Land document in the name of Implementing Vide letter dated 04.07.20, Industries Agency Commissioner, informed that land is in possession of Dept. Of MSME, GoMP and possession of land to MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned. (iv) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost Provided escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (v) Status of completed ID projects in the State Provided (vi) Certificate from State Government for Provided compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Ltd State : Madhya Pradesh District : : Balaghat Industrial Estate : : Akodi Lac Industrial Cluster

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout plan Yes Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 22.44 Area to be developed (acre) 14.82 Number and sizes of plots to be developed 32 Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: year of No projects sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc.

Performance of ID projects in State 12 projects have been completed and 02 are under implementation. 3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency MP Laghu Udyog Nigam Limited, Indore -- (IA) Track Record of the IA M.P. Laghu Udyog Nigam (MPLUN) is a -- Government of M. P. Undertaking established in the year 1961, the Nigam is constantly implementing the State Government's policies for development of SSI sector. Appraisal by SIDBI Submitted Submitted (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient 6 kms from Balaghat town; on State -- facilities available at site. highway 26 (Proximity to railway stations / state highways, availability of water supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers) Whether land is in Land is under possession of DTIC Balaghat Vide letter dated possession in the name of 04.07.20, Industries IA with Clear Title Commissioner, informed that land is in Whether Zoning yes possession of Dept. Of regulations and non- MSME, GoMP and agricultural conversion etc possession of land to complied with) MPLUN (IA) would be given as project is sanctioned. Whether State Level The State has already implemented similar Constituted Committee to coordinate ID and monitor progress has projects in the past and has all the been Constituted monitoring institutions in place Whether confirmation IA has already provisioned investment Submitted received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of As per MSE-CDP guidelines -- project Cost Tangible Outcomes of the Infrastructure development for lac cluster -- project Justification of the Balaghat is one of the major lac producing --

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Proposal districts of Madhya Pradesh. "Kusmi" lac recorded positive growth. There is a new demand by the lac industries for infrastructure which is being proposed. 4. Proposed project cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Revised cost Recommended by by IA proposed by SIDBI/ As per IA MSE-CDP (i) Land filling/levelling including 5.47 101.23 100.00 boundary wall and fencing (ii) Laying roads 477.46 252.99 200.00 (iii) Construction of foot paths 76.81 0.00 0.00 (iv) Road side greenery & social forestry 15.03 10.00 10.00 (v) Water supply including overhead 78.86 93.97 93.97 tanks, and pump houses

(vi) Water harvesting 0.00 10.00 10.00 (vii) Construction of Storm Drainage 54.25 60.00 60.00 Network (viii) Power distribution, Street light 186.08 227.09 227.09 arrangements, etc. (ix) Administrative and Other Services 55.79 148.63 144.63 Complex (x) Effluent Treatment Facilities 92.74 80.00 80.00 (xi) Construction of other utilities 10.75 0.00 0.00 (xii) Contingencies & Pre operative 31.59 24.24 20.00 expenses (xiii) Other (Escalation, Supervision, GST) 267.47 10.00 10.00 Total 1352.30 1018.15 955.69

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Revised cost Recommended by IA proposed by IA by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 600.00 573.41 573.41

(ii) State Government contribution/ 752.30 444.74 444.74 Total 1352.30 1018.15 1018.15 * GoI grant of Rs. 573.41 lakh is 60.00% of total eligible project cost of Rs.955.69 lakh

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to final approval.

(i) Land document in the name of Implementing Agency.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Akodi Village, Teh Waraseoni, District Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 1018.15 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 573.41 lakh and State Government’s contribution of Rs. 444.74 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.16: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Imphal East District, Manipur. Background

(i) Proposal was recommended by the 71st Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Approval. (ii)Vide email dated 20.12.20, Managing Director, Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) Appraisal Report Received. (ii) Registered land documents in the name of As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land Implementing Agency i.e. MANIDCO should be in the name of the with clear title, complying zoning Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear regulations and non-agricultural Title and complying with Zoning conversion etc. regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal. (iii) Commitment letter from State Received. Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of Undertaking not received. roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO. (v) Cost of land filing and levelling should Undertaking not received. be funded by State Share. (vi) Undertaking from Implementing Agency Not received. regarding basis of component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format. (vii) Estimates of the civil works should be Not received. counter signed by CPWD.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Directorate of Commerce & Industries, Manipur State : Manipur District : Imphal East Industrial Estate : New Industrial Estate at Imphal East,Manipur

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved Yes. layout plan received or not Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 13.12 Area to be developed (acre) 7.00 Number and sizes of plots to be 63 plots with size of 2400 sqft (60 ft length x 40 ft developed breadth) will be developed in the new industrial estate. Implementing period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same Nil. district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State 6 ID projects completed

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) Implementing Agency (IA) Manipur Industrial Development As per MSE-CDP Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), guidelines. Imphal. Track Record of the IA The implementing agency has a good -- track record of taking up major infrastructural projects in the state. Appraisal by SIDBI Submitted. Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient Yes. All the basic facilities are available --

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) facilities available at site. at project site. Details are provided (Proximity to railway below: stations / state highways, (i) The site of Imhal East Industrial availability of water Estate at Sajeb is located supply, adequate power approximately 7.0 kms of capital supply, telecom facilities, city of Imphal. dwelling places of (ii) The distance from the site to the workers) nearest National Highway No. 202 is far by approximately 4.5 km. (iii) The source of water for Imphal East at Sajeb may be drawn from two resources: (a) Iril river. (b) The Department of Public Health and Engineering Department (PHED). Whether land is in Yes, Yes, land proposed for the project As per MSE-CDP possession in the name of has been taken by MANIDCO on lease guidelines, the land IA with Clear Title for a period of 25 years from should be in the name Department of Trade, Commerce & of the Implementing Industries, Govt. of Manipur Agency (IA) with Clear commencing from 25th October 2018. Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal. Whether Zoning Yes. Received. regulations and non- agricultural conversion etc complied with)

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency Remarks (IA) Whether State Level State level committee has been Constituted Committee to coordinate constituted. and monitor progress has been constituted Whether confirmation Yes, Escalation (if any) in the project Received. received form IA that it cost shall be met by State Govt. / IA. will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of The cost estimates as per general Required. project cost abstract of civil works of all components in the project cost as mentioned in the DPR has been prepared on the basis of Manipur Schedule of Rates (MSR), 2017. Tangible Outcomes of the Particulars Before After intervention project intervention Total area to be Nil 7.00 acres out of a developed total of 13.12 acres. No. of plots to be Nil 63 plots to be developed developed with size of 60 ft. x 40 ft. for each plot. No. of plots to be Nil 55 plots allotted to MSEs. No. of plots to be Nil 8 plots. allotted to industries other than MSEs. Employment Nil Direct employment - expected to be 600. generated Indirect employment- 1000.

Justification of the The development of the new industrial -- Proposal estate will help in providing a concrete infrastructure for all the units coming up in the industrial estate. Also, it will provide direct / indirect employment opportunities to approximately 1600 people.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI 1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/levelling including 118.59 100.00 boundary wall /fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads 210.54 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.64 9.64 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, 110.87 110.00 and pump houses (v) Water harvesting 10.03 10.00 (vi) Drainage (Internal) 69.28 60.00 (vii) Power (Substation & distribution 249.92 249.92 network including streetlight etc.). Generation of non-conventional energy. (viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 9.89 9.89 Sub Total 788.76 749.45 2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 32.00 20.00 (ii) Documentation centre 32.00 20.00 (iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Center 34.29 30.00 (iv) Bank / Post Office 24.62 20.00 (v) Raw Material Storage Facility, 47.82 40.00 Marketing Outlets (vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen 25.00 20.00 Facility Sub Total 195.73 150.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.24 80.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 20.00 20.00 Total 1084.73 999.45

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 799.56* (ii) State Govt. / IA contribution 284.73 285.17 Total 1084.73 1084.73 * GoI grant of Rs. 799.56 lakh is 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.999.45 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should be in the name of the Implementing Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non- agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal. (ii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of component-wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format. (iii) Estimates of the civil works should be counter signed by CPWD. (iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO. Undertaking from State Govt./IA may be submitted. (v) Cost of land filing and levelling should be funded by State Share. Undertaking from State Govt./IA may be submitted.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Imphal East District, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs. 1084.73 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 799.56 lakh and State Government contribution /IA is Rs. 285.17 lakh. *****

Agenda No. 54.3.17: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District, Manipur. Background

(i) Proposal was recommended by the 71st Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 06.03.20, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to Approval.

(ii) Vide email dated 20.12.20, Managing Director, Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) Appraisal Report. Received. (ii) Registered land documents in the As per MSE-CDP guidelines, the land should name of Implementing Agency i.e. be in the name of the Implementing Agency MANIDCO with clear title, complying (IA) with Clear Title and complying with zoning regulations and non- Zoning regulations and non-agricultural agricultural conversion etc. conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal. (iii) Commitment letter from State Received. Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (iv) MANIDCO should consider laying of Undertaking not received. roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Manipur / MANIDCO. (v) Cost of land filing and levelling Undertaking not received. should be funded by State Share. (vi) Undertaking from Implementing Not received. Agency regarding basis of component- wise cost estimates of project cost as per provided format. (vii) Estimates of the civil works should be Not received. counter signed by CPWD.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited State : Manipur District : Senapati Industrial Estate : New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District,Manipur

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved Yes. layout plan received or not Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 10.00 Area to be developed (acre) 7.00 Number and sizes of plots to be 60 plots with size of 2400 sq. ft. (60 ft. length x developed 40 ft. breadth) will be developed in the new industrial estate. Implementing period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same Nil. district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State 6 ID projects completed.

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency Manipur Industrial Development As per MSE-CDP (IA) Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal guidelines. Track Record of the IA The implementing agency has a good track -- record of taking up major infrastructural projects in the state. Appraisal by SIDBI Submitted. Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report.

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Whether sufficient Yes. All the basic facilities are available at -- facilities available at project site. Details are provided below: site. (Proximity to  The site of Senapati Industrial Estate at railway stations / state Katomei is located approximately 62 kms highways, availability of capital city of Imphal along national of water supply, Highway No. 2. adequate power supply, The distance from the site to the nearest telecom facilities, National Highway No. 2 is far by dwelling places of approximately 20 km. workers)  The source of water for Senapati Industrial Estate at Katomei may be drawn from two resources:  Senapati river.  The Department of Public Health and Engineering Department (PHED). Whether land is in Yes, land proposed for the project has been As per MSE-CDP possession in the name taken by MANIDCO on lease for a period of guidelines, the land of IA with Clear Title 25 years from Department of Trade, should be in the name Commerce & Industries, Govt. of Manipur of the Implementing commencing from 25th October 2018. Agency (IA) with Clear Title and complying with Zoning regulations and non-agricultural conversion etc. However, the land document submitted by Govt. of Manipur is a lease deed for 25 years in the name of Manipur Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MANIDCO), Imphal. Therefore, Govt. of Manipur has to submit registered land document in the name of Implementing Agency (IA) i.e. MANIDCO, Imphal. Whether Zoning Yes. Received. regulations and non- agricultural conversion

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks etc complied with) Whether State Level State level committee has been constituted. Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been constituted Whether confirmation Submitted. Received. received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of The cost estimates as per general abstract of Required. project cost civil works of all components in the project cost as mentioned in the DPR has been prepared on the basis of Manipur Schedule of Rates (MSR), 2017. Tangible Outcomes of Particulars Before After intervention the project intervention Total area to be Nil 7.00 acres out of a developed total of 10 acres. No. of plots to be Nil 60 plots to be developed developed with size of 60 ft. x 40 ft. for each plot. No. of plots to be Nil 55 plots allotted to MSEs. No. of plots to be Nil 5 plots. allotted to industries other than MSEs. Employment Nil Direct employment - expected to be 600. generated Indirect employment- 1000.

Justification of the The development of the new industrial estate -- Proposal will help in providing a concrete infrastructure for all the units coming up in the industrial estate. Also, it will provide direct / indirect employment opportunities to approximately 1600 people.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by As per MSE-CDP / IA Recommended by SIDBI 1. Land Development and other overhead infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary 143.72 100.00 wall /fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads 210.54 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.64 9.64 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks and 110.87 110.00 pump houses (v) Water harvesting 10.03 10.00 (vi) Drainage (Internal) 69.28 60.00 (vii) Power (Substation & distribution network 249.92 249.92 including streetlight etc.). Generation of non- conventional energy (viii) Other (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 9.89 9.89 Sub Total 813.89 749.45 2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 32.00 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication/ Documentation 32.00 20.00 centre/Cyber Centre (iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition Center 34.29 30.00 (iv) Bank / Post Office 24.62 20.00 (v) Raw Material Storage Facility, Marketing 47.82 40.00 Outlets (vi) First Aid Centre, Creche, Canteen Facility 25.00 20.00 Sub Total 195.73 150.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 80.24 80.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses 20.00 20.00 Total 1109.86 999.45

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / No. Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 800.00 799.56* (ii) State Govt. / IA contribution 309.86 310.30 Total 1109.86 1109.86 * GoI grant of Rs. 799.56 lakh is 80% of total eligible project cost of Rs.999.45 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of New Industrial Estate at Katomei, Senapati District, Manipur at a total project cost of Rs. 1109.86 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 799.56 lakh and State Government contribution /IA is Rs. 310.30 lakh.

*****

Agenda No. 54.3.18: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Angargadia Industrial Estate at Balasore District, Odisha

Background

(i) Proposal was recommended in the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19 subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval. (ii) Vide letter dated 18.08.20 from MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

S. No. Documents required Status (i) SIDBI appraisal report. Received (ii) English version of registered land documents Received

(iii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / Implementing Received Agency to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR / Received CVC guidelines. (vi) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in Received the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (vii) Cost of land filling & levelling should be met from State share. Received (viii) Undertaking from IA regarding basis of estimates of component Received costs as per format provided. (ix) State Government/IA should consider enhancement of their Received contribution.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO) State : Odisha District : Balasore Industrial Estate : Industrial Estate at Angargadia (Up-gradation).

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved Yes layout plan received or not Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 30.47 Area to be developed (acre) 30.47 Number and sizes of plots to be Currently there are around 80 manufacturing units in developed Industrial Estate Angargadia. Implementing Period 24 months 98

Particulars Description Other ID projects sanctioned in same One ID project at Somnathpur, District Balasore district: year of sanction, number of plots completed under MSE-CDP during 2006. allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure As per MSE-CDP Development Corporation (IDCO). guidelines. Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal yet to be done. Received (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities Balasore Railway station is around 3 km -- available at site. (Proximity and Kharagpur Railway Station railway to railway stations / state station is around 130 km from IE, highways, availability of Angargadia. water supply, adequate power The industrial estate Angargadia is very supply, telecom facilities, adjacent NH 16 within 100 m distance. dwelling places of workers) National Highway 16 (NH 16) is a major National Highway in India, that runs along east coast of West Bengal, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. It was previously known as National Highway 5. Bhubaneswar International Airport is around 198 km from Industrial Estate Angargadia. Airport is well connected to cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Chennai, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Vizag, Kerala, Amritsar, Goa etc. Whether land is in possession Land is in possession and in the name of English version of in the name of IA with Clear IDCO with clear title. registered land Title documents in the name of Whether Zoning regulations Yes Implementing and non-agricultural Agency is received. conversion etc complied with): Whether State Level Yes Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted Whether confirmation Yes Received received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Cost estimates have been made by -- Cost internal engineering wing of IDCO. 99

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Tangible Outcomes of the Upgradation of Industrial area will -- project provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system. Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, -- Angargadia with components such as roads, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 2008. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. Particulars Proposed Recommended by No. by IA SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP 1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Cost of land filling/levelling including boundary 102.62 100.00 wall and fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads 208.00 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 10.52 10.00 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump 78.22 78.22 houses (v) Water harvesting 9.84 9.84 (vi) Drainage 95.62 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work 106.50 106.50 including Street light etc), Generation of non- conventional energy (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 12.91 10.00 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building 29.32 20.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ Documentation 20.20 20.00 Centre (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 20.79 20.79 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 22.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets ` 42.00 40.00 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 22.00 20.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 0.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 20.00 20.00 Total 800.54 735.35

100

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. Particulars Proposed As per SIDBI / No. by IA MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 588.28 514.74 (64.30%) (ii) State Government / IA 212.26 285.80 (35.70%) Total 800.54 800.54 (100%) *SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 514.74 lakh as 64.30% of eligible project cost of Rs. 735.35 lakh.

6. Observations:

Following document is required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Angargadia Industrial Estate at Balasore District, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 800.54 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 514.74 lakh and Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OSIC), Cuttack contribution of Rs. 285.80 lakh.

*****

101

Agenda No. 54.3.19: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Chandaka Industrial Estate (Phase 1) at Khordha, Odisha.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 19.08.20, MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (ii) Copy of approved layout plan. Not clear in DPR. (iii) Commitment letter from State Received. Government / IA to meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (iv) Certificate from State Government for Not received. compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. (v) Certificate from State Government that Required from State Government. more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (vi) Cost of land filling & leveling should be Received met from State share. (vii) Undertaking from IA regarding basis of Received estimates of component costs as per format provided.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO) State : Odisha District : Khordha Industrial Estate : Industrial Estate at Chandaka (Up-gradation)

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved No layout plan received or not Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 939.720 acres Area to be developed (acre) 100 acres Number and sizes of plots to be developed Total 572 units are operational in the area.

102

Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same No other ID project is sanctioned till date. district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure As per MSE-CDP Development Corporation (IDCO). guidelines. Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal report submitted. Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities Yes. All the basic facilities are available -- available at site. (Proximity at project site. Khordha railway station if to railway stations / state 13.5 km and Bhubaneswar railway station highways, availability of is 13.3 km from IE, Chandaka. water supply, adequate power IE, Chandaka is 9 km away from NH-16. supply, telecom facilities, dwelling places of workers) Whether land is in possession Land is in possession and in the name of Received. in the name of IA with Clear IDCO with clear title. Title Whether Zoning regulations Yes and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with): Whether State Level Yes Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted Whether confirmation Yes Received. received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Cost estimates have been made by Chief -- Cost General Manager (P&C) of IDCO on the basis of Odisha Schedule Rate (OSR) – 2014 (revised GST). Tangible Outcomes of the Upgradation of Industrial area will -- project provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no

103

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system. Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, -- Chandaka with components such as roads, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 1982. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP / by IA Recommended by SIDBI 1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Land filling/levelling including boundary wall 91.91 91.91 and fencing: (ii) Laying roads 208.00 208.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 12.75 12.75 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and 106.32 106.32 pump houses (v) Water harvesting 13.21 13.21 (vi) Drainage 95.00 95.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work 247.00 247.00 work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 18.05 18.05 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building 22.94 22.00 (ii) Telecommunication /Cyber Centre/ 20.29 20.29 Documentation Centre (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 32.00 32.00 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 20.00 20.00 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 41.00 41.00 ` (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 22.00 22.00 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 0.00 0.00 4. Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 20.00 20.00 Total 970.47 969.53

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP / by IA Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 724.18 724.18 (ii) State Government / IA 246.29 246.29 Total 970.47 970.47 104

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Copy of approved layout plan. (ii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. (iii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Chandaka Industrial Estate (Phase 1) at Khordha, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 970.47 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 724.18 lakh, State Government/IA contribution of Rs. 246.29 lakh.

*****

105

Agenda No. 54.3.20: Proposal for Final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Pradeep, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval. (ii) Vide letter dated 19.08.20, MSME-DI, Cuttack has submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) Registered land documents in the name of Land document is not clearly Implementing Agency (IA). visible in the DPR. Registered land document is required. (ii) Copy of approved layout plan. Not received. (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (iv) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to Received. meet the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (v) Certificate from State Government for compliance Not received. of GFR/CVC guidelines. (vi) Certificate from State Government that more than Required from State 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Government. Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (vii) Cost of land filling & leveling should be met from Received State share. (viii) Undertaking from IA regarding basis of estimates Received of component costs as per format provided.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO) State : Odisha District : Jagatsinghpur Industrial Estate : Industrial Estate at Paradeep (Up-gradation).

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved No layout plan received or not Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 37.01 Acres Area to be developed (acre) 37.01 Acres Number and sizes of plots to be Total 35 units are operational in the area. developed 106

Particulars Description Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same No other ID project is sanctioned till date. district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA): Odisha Industrial Infrastructure As per MSE-CDP Development Corporation (IDCO). guidelines. Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI SIDBI appraisal report submitted. Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities Paradeep railway station is 7.1 km from -- available at site. (Proximity IE,Paradeep to railway stations / state NH 53 is in close proximity to IE, highways, availability of Paradeep. water supply, adequate power Sufficient quantity of water is available supply, telecom facilities, and is provided to existing industrial units dwelling places of workers) at IE, Paradeep. Whether land is in possession Land is in possession and in the name of Required in the name of IA with Clear IDCO with clear title. Title Whether Zoning regulations Yes and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with): Whether State Level Yes Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor progress has been Constituted Whether confirmation Yes Received. received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Cost estimates have been made by Chief -- Cost General Manager (P&C) of IDCO on the basis of Odisha Schedule Rate (OSR) – 2014 (revised GST). Tangible Outcomes of the Upgradation of Industrial area will -- project provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, 107

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system. Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, -- Paradeep with components such as roads, drainage system, power, administrative and other services complex etc. This industrial estate was initially developed in the year 1975. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI 1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure (i) Land filling/levelling including 99.97 99.97 boundary wall and fencing: (ii) Laying roads 171.54 171.54 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 4.74 4.74 (iv) Water supply including overhead 106.51 106.51 tanks, and pump houses (v) Water harvesting 9.85 9.85 (vi) Drainage 77.62 77.62 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution 106.50 106.50 net-work work including Street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences etc.) 13.20 13.20 2. Administrative and other services complex (i) Administrative Office Building 17.40 17.40 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 86.05 86.05 4. Contingencies & Pre operative 20.00 20.00 expenses . Total 713.38 713.38

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. Particulars Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP / No. Recommended by SIDBI (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 480.56 480.56 (ii) State Government /IA 232.82 232.82 Total 713.38 713.38

108

6. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency (IA). (ii) Copy of approved layout plan. (iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. (iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Pradeep, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 713.38 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 480.56 lakh, State Government/IA contribution of Rs. 232.82 lakh.

*****

109

Agenda No. 54.3.21: Proposal for final approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack, Odisha. Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 50th SCM held on 12.02.2019 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval. (ii) Vide letter dated 12.08.20 from Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OSIC), Cuttack has submitted the documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

S. No. Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter regarding Received enhancement of State share to 30%. (ii) Registered land documents in the name of To be Implementing Agency submitted (iii) Copy of approved Layout plan. To be submitted (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Received (v) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to Received meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (vi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of To be GFR/CVC guidelines submitted (vii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% To be of units in the Industrial Estate are micro. submitted (viii) IDCO should consider laying of roads with Cement Received Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Odisha / IDCO (ix) Cost of land filing & levelling should be funded by Received State share (x) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding Received basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation(IDCO) State : Odisha District : Cuttack Industrial Estate : IE, Jagatpur

110

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved No layout plan Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 343.00 Acres Area to be developed (acre) 343.00 Acres Number and sizes of plots to be There are around 475 units operating within the developed Industrial Estate. Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same No other ID project is sanctioned till date. district: year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up etc. Performance of ID projects in State 3 ID projects completed

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposal by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Basis of elements of project Cost estimates have been made by -- Cost internal engineering wing of IDCO. Tangible Outcomes of the Upgradation of Industrial area will -- project provide support to industries present in the industrial area in terms of better connectivity, minimum wear and tear which will lead to economic gains, better transport will lead to more connectivity, proper drainage system will lead to no water logging during rains, connectivity from industry to main drainage system will lead to better system. Justification of the proposal This DPR proposes upgradation of the IE, -- Jagatpur with components such as roads, drainage complex etc. This industrial estate was last developed in the year 2008. But with time infrastructure has deteriorated. Industries are bearing wear and tear cost. Transport companies are charging higher tariffs in return which are increasing the overall production cost. Drains constructed, are also completely damaged, which is causing water stagnation within the industrial estate.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by SIDBI/ by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Land filling/levelling including boundary 96.55 96.55 wall and fencing (ii) Laying roads 201.46 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 14.90 10.00 (iv) Rain water Harvesting Structures 7.10 7.10 (v) Drainage 61.25 60.00 (vi) Power distribution, Street light 245.50 245.50 arrangements, etc. (vii) Toilets, Sanitary, Conveniences 12.77 10.00 (viii) Administrative and Other Services Complex 20.18 20.00 (ix) Telecom/Cyber/Documentation centre 20.28 20.00 (x) Conference Hall/Exhibition centre 27.44 27.44 (xi) First aid centre,Creche Canteen 24.87 20.00 (xii) Contingencies & Pre operative expenses : 14.65 14.65 Total 746.95 731.24

5. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) GoI Grant under MSE-CDP 590.38 511.87 (ii) State Government 156.57 235.08 Total 746.95 746.95 *SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 511.87 lakh as 68.52% of eligible project cost of Rs. 746.95 lakh. 112

6. Observations:

Following document is required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Implementing Agency (ii) Copy of approved Layout plan. (iii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines (iv) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% of units in the Industrial Estate are micro.

7. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for up-gradation of Industrial Estate, Jagatpur, Cuttack, Odisha at a total project cost of Rs. 746.95 lakh with GoI grant of Rs. 511.87 lakh and Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OSIC), Cuttack contribution of Rs.235.08 lakh.

*****

113

Agenda No. 54.3.22: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab. Background:

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 51st SCM held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval. (ii) Vide letter dated 04.08.20, Government of Punjab submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land documents with clear title in the name of SPV Received (ii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Received (iv) Copy of Article of Association & Memorandum of Association Received (v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution Received (vi) Details of shareholding pattern Received (vii) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 Received percent of installed capacity (viii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the escalation Received cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost (ix) Certificate from State Government stating that more than 50% units in Received the cluster are Micro/SC-ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be (x) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC Received guidelines

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Sewing Machine Cluster District : Ludhiana Location of Cluster : Village Doburji, VPO-Raul, Tehsil-Payal Lok Sabha Constituency : Ludhiana Main Product : Sewing machine body, its stand and various parts. No. of Enterprises including Units : No. break up (Micro, Small, Micro : 91 Medium) : Small : 11

Total : 102 Turnover for the last five years Year Amount (Rs in Crore) : 2013-14 : Rs. 7.90 2014-15 : Rs. 8.40 2015-16 : Rs. 9.10 2016-17 : Rs. 8.70 2017-18 : Rs. 9.50 Exports for the last five years (Rs Year Amount in Crore): 2013-14 : Rs. 0.60 2014-15 : Rs. 0.70 2015-16 : Rs. 0.90 2016-17 : Rs. 0.75 2017-18 : Rs. 1.00 Employment in Cluster : 6000 Technology Details : Conventional Whether DS Conducted : Yes Main findings of DSR :  A state of the art Centre needs to be created which will have

114

advanced technologies such as Automatic Casting Plant, VMC 5 Axis, HMC, CNC Turning, Automatic Powder Coating Plant, Automatic Painting Plant, Vacuum Hardening Machine, CNC Robo Drill, CNC Wire Cut, Automatic Machine Hardness Tester, Spectrometer Calibration, Lab Chemical and Metal Testing Lab, CAD/CAM Software, 3D Scanner etc.;  Installation of Non Conventional Energy Generation Equipments like Solar Power Plant etc.;  Establishment of lab and research & development which will have spectroscope, UTM, impact testing machine, polishing machine etc.  In order to train the workers on 5S, 3M & Kaizens, use of 7QC tools for non conformity control, Pokayoke (Fool Proofing), inventory control, productivity (OEE) improvement etc. for skill development. Training Centre needs to be developed. Main Problems of Cluster :  No facilities of Tool Room with latest machines, calibration and testing lab service and training on design software/ designing of components/ dies/ jigs & fixtures in Ludhiana for Sewing Machine Industry. Due to which, the units are not able to produce good quality products to meet the requirements of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and other customers abroad.  Non-availability design facilities, units are not able to design new components or products marketable in Global Market. Hence, there is a need to establish Common Facility Centre at Ludhiana.  Currently, cost of manufacturing the Industrial Sewing Machines are quite higher in India and these are being imported from China, Japan and Taiwan.  By installing this plant, unit holders will be able to manufacture sewing machines at a reasonable cost and it will also serve the dream of Make in India initiative by Hon’ble Prime Minister.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Comments by Cluster (IA) Division (a.) Justification for CFC  The proposed Common Facility -- Centre in this cluster will result in technological advancement in terms of development of International Standard Sewing Machines and Industrial Sewing Machines, which is in huge demand and is financially beneficial as compared to domestic Sewing Machine in Ludhiana. Imports will be reduced and quality of the machines will be improved.  There is a need for CFC, which will offer following facilities:  Job work of casting through high pressure unit, machining of the component, paint  Tool Room with Latest Machinery  Design Centre for Designing and Training  Calibration & Testing Lab 115

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Comments by Cluster (IA) Division Services etc.  The machines being planned for the CFC will be of high value and the building for such type of machinery is comprehensive and invites huge financial outlay, which is not possible by any individual catering to Sewing Machine market (comprising of majority of micro enterprises). In this case, CFC will serve the purpose. (b.) Location of CFC VPO Daburji Tehsil Payal Ludhiana. -- % age of units in radius of 20 -- 5km % age of units in radius of 25 -- 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes Received ii. Title is in name of Sewing Machine Technology Park (Regd.) iii. Valuation and its basis 60.00 lakh (Market price including stamp charges) iv. Land is sufficient Yes -- v. Change of land use To be taken after purchase of land -- vi. If on lease, duration of Not applicable -- lease vii Whether lease is legally Not applicable -- tenable (d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 43560 sq. ft -- (e.) Rate of construction of 83.00 lakh -- building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Casting of sewing machine body and -- other components.  Machining of sewing machine body and its parts.  Paint/ Powder sewing machine and its parts.  Research & Development of New Sewing Machine Model.  Tool Room with latest machinery.  Calibration & Testing lab services.

(g.) Prod capacity of CFC Casting - 720000 kg per annum, Machine -- Process - 45600 hours per annum, Paint/Powder Coating - 90000 pc (Machine) per annum (h.)Major Outputs/Deliverables of CFC, Particulars Before CFC After CFC Projected performance of the No. of units 102 125 cluster after proposed Turnover (Rs. in 950.00 1200.00 intervention (in terms of crore) production, export/domestic Export (Rs. in crore) 100.00 175.00 sales and direct/indirect Employment (nos.) 6000 (Direct 7500 (Direct & employment, etc.) & Indirect) Indirect) Profitability Appox. 10% Appox. 12% of of sale sale turnover turnover

116

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Comments by Cluster (IA) Division (i.)Pollution clearance Yes Required required or not (j.) Manpower in CFC 35 -- (k.) Revenue generation The Charges to be levied will be decided -- mechanism for sustainability by Executive Body of SPV after of assets(service/user charges consultation with members. to be levied, any other-to be specified)

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Comments of Cluster Agency (IA) Division (a.) Name and Address Ludhiana Sewing Machine -- Technology Park Association, 6004, Daba Road, Shimlapuri, Ludhiana- 141003 (b.) Nature of SPV(company or Company Act 2013 -- Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the State Govt. and GM-DIC Ludhiana, Director -- MSME officials in SPV MSME-DI, Ludhiana (d.) Date of formation of SPV 12.01.2021 -- (e.) Number of Members 26 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA -- Received submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital 50 lakh Promoters Contribution -- (h.) Paid up capital as on...... -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern The Contribution would be shared Received equally & each member would not hold more than 10%. (j.) Commitment letter for Submitted Received contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c M/s Sewing Machine Technology -- Park. (Rrgd.) Bank - Bank of Baroda, Branch - Industrial Area, Partap Nagar, Ludhiana A/c No. 01040200001537 IFSC Code - BARB0INDLUD (l.) Trust Building of SPV, The SPV Members visited Mohali -- Previous track record of co- Cluster which has motivated them to operative initiatives pursued by set up a CFC. SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution MSME-D, Ludhiana -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by SPV All members agreed that information Received members as also others in a about services available at CFC will cluster. However, evidence be shared with non- SPV members

117

Description Proposed by Implementation Comments of Cluster Agency (IA) Division should be furnished with regard units of cluster so that they can also to SPV member ability to utilise get the benefit of facilities available at least 60 percent of installed at CFC. The target is to utilize 60% capacity. of capacity of CFC in 1st year of running & capacity utilization will be gradually increased to 100% (o.) (a) Power requirement for 500 KW or 1080000 Units -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water Submersible pump -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities N/A --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Comments of Cluster (IA) Division (a.) Implementing Agency Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), As per MSE-CDP (b.) Fund receiving Agency Chandigarh guidelines (c.) Implementation Period 12 months 24 months from issuance of final approval letter. (d.) Appraisal of DPR and Submitted Received main Recommendations (e.) Comments of Technical Received TEAC recommended the Division proposal (f.) Approval of Technical Recommended Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster -- -- Development Division: (h.) Working capital(In- Bank of Baroda agreed to sanction -- principle sanction of loan from Working Capital Loan. State a bank, if applicable Government Contribution of 10% in arrangement made) the project of CFC in Sewing Machine Cluster has been considered.

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Comments of Cluster Division (a.) BEP 35.16% 47.59% (As per SIDBI) (b.) IRR, Payback period 4 Years Approx. -- (c.) DSCR 3.21 Average DSCR-12.26 (As per SIDBI) (d.) Return on Capital 25.31% 30.46% (As per SIDBI) employed (ROCE) (e.) NPV Rs. 127.87 lakh -- (f.) DER 2.0 -- Debt- Rs. 100.00 lakh Equity- Rs. 50.00 lakh (g.) Sensitivity Analysis Sensitivity analysis is performed for 10% -- reduction of capacity or fall in sales. 118

(h.) Status of CFCs Two CFCs- Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali -- approved in the State and Oil Expeller, Ludhiana are under process. 6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP/ by IA Recommended by SIDBI (i) Land and its Development 60.00 60.00 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 83.00 83.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including electrification) 1266.97 1266.97 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 42.86 42.86 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, 24.50 24.50 maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on plant 18.00 18.00 and machinery) Total 1495.33 1495.33

7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars % Proposed by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Govt. of India grant under MSE- 79.97 1195.85 1195.85 CDP (ii) Grant from Govt. of Punjab 10.00 149.48 149.48 (iii) SPV contribution 3.34 50.00 50.00 (iv) Bank loan / others 6.69 100.00 100.00 Total 100.00 1495.33 1495.33

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

.No. Description No. Power Cost Requirement (HP/KW) 1. Moulding Machines 1 181 kw 567.34 Including - Electrical Control Panel, Hydraulic operated punchout System, Track Runway for Casting, Hopper with Load Cells, Mixer and Cooler, Belt Conveyor set, Pully, Pouring System, Technical support , Fabrication, Installation & Commissioning 2. Vertical Machining Centre 1 32 kw 61.22 3. Special Purpose Machinery 15 90 kw 106.20 4. Horizontal Machining Centre 1 32 kw 256.43 5. Powder Coating Plant 1 16 kw 41.30 6. 3D Scanner 1 1 kw 8.50 7. Spectrometer 1 3 kw 21.54 8. Hardness Tester 1 4 kw 3.36 9. CAD CAM Software 1 - 5.46

119

.No. Description No. Power Cost Requirement (HP/KW) 10. Air Pollution Control System for Induction Furnace 1 16 kw 11.80 and Machining Plant 11. Furnance Duty Transformer 1 - 8.49 12. Genset 1 - 22.45 13. EOT Crane 1 20kw 28.56 14. Furnace Accessories 1 - 17.70 15. Power Point 1 240 KW 21.54 16. Furnace Transformer 1 240 KW 7.67 17. Melting Furnace 2 240 KW 10.39 18. Furnace Selector Switches 2 240 KW 2.12 19. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Lathe 1 24 KW 19.94 20. Computer Numerical Control (CNC) Lathe 1 24 KW 27.49 21. Surface Plate 1 - 0.94 22. Zero Zero Grade Slip Gauge Box 1 - 4.13 23. Calliper Checker 1 - 0.12 24. Height Master 1 - 1.77 25. Pressure Gauge 1 - 1.48 26. Digital Pressure Gauge 1 - 0.35 27. Dial Calibrater 1 - 2.36 28. Main LT with APFC Panel 1 - 6.32 Total 1266.97

9. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Sewing Machine Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1495.33 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 1195.85 lakh, Government of Punjab contribution of Rs. 149.48 lakh, SPV’s contribution of Rs. 50.00 lakh and bank loan of Rs. 100.00 lakh.

*******

120

Agenda No. 54.3.23: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Cutting Tools Cluster, Patiala, Punjab.

Background

 Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 52nd SCM held on 22.01.2020, subject to submission of following documents prior to Final approval.  Vide letter dated 05.11.20 and email dated 24.02.21, Government of Punjab submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a RLA for land has been minimum period of 30 years allotted by PSIEC. The land has been allotted on lease hold basis for a period of 99 years. (ii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members Provided (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report Provided (iv) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board Provided (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 Provided percent of installed capacity (vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet Provided the cost escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% Provided units in the cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be (ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ Provided CVC guidelines (x) Details of SPV and MoA & AoA Provided (xi) Documentary proof to enhance the no. of Type-B user Provided members, with a token contribution/ commitment fee for utilising the CFC facilities at a relatively higher fee as decided by CFC management (xii) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME- Required DO (xiii) Details of production capacity Provided (xiv) Commitment for a minimum of State Government Provided contribution of 10% of total project cost

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster Cutting Tools Cluster District Patiala

121

Location of Cluster B-8A, Focal Point, Patiala Lok Sabha Constituency Patiala Main Product Slitting Saws, Gear Hobs, Broaches, Misc. Cutters etc. No. of Enterprises including break up Units : Nos. (Micro, Small, Medium) Micro : 50 Small : 30 Medium : 04 Total : 84

Turnover for the last five years Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2013-14 : Rs. 150.00 2014-15 : Rs. 180.00 2015-16 : Rs. 200.00 2016-17 : Rs. 225.00 2017-18 : Rs. 250.00

Exports for the last five years Year Amount (Rs in Crore) 2013-14 : Rs. 1.00 2014-15 : Rs. 5.00 2015-16 : Rs. 10.00 2016-17 : Rs. 15.00 2017-18 : Rs. 25.00

Employment in Cluster Total: 3000 Nos. (Direct: 1000 Nos. & Indirect: 2000 Nos.) Technology Details The CFC Technology would help the cluster units to manufacture high precision products with very low variations i.e. below 8 micron thereby allowing the product quality to be upgraded to AA or AAA. Cluster units are not manufacturing carbite tools. Tool Room machinery would help in precision die cutting tools for various applications to achieve high level of accuracy as required by high end / OEM customers. Whether DS conducted Yes Main findings of DSR  Gaps in product standardization and quality  High production cycle time and lack of precision owing to use of conventional machinery.  Inability to tap value added markets of superior grade products and lack of transition towards carbide tools. These gaps are evidently constraints that merit establishment of relatively capital intensive equipments. Appropriate interventions could enable the production of superior grade (A to AAA) products for OEMs and premium customers, increased capacity utilization of the firms, and production of carbide tools to tap their expanding import substitution market. A CFC is a dire need. Main Problems of Cluster  Non-access to cost prohibitive latest technology machines.  Majority of the micro enterprises are dealing with only one product segment.  While, Gear Hobs and Broach manufacturers provide low cost customized solutions to their clients, the General Cutting Tool manufacturers also cater to standardized product range.

Therefore, CFC is expected to address the 122

technological gaps being faced by the cluster members as a stimulant for volume growth and profitability by providing quality products.

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC  To facilitate cluster units to progressively -- cater to premium market segments like OEMs.  To facilitate production of Carbide cutting tools to tap growing market needs.  To improve capacity of the units and create additional employment opportunities in the region. (b.) Location of CFC B-8A, Industrial Focal Point, Patiala, where -- majority of the Cutting Tool units of Patiala are located. % age of units in radius 71 -- of 5km % age of units in radius 29 -- of 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Yes RLA for land ii. Title is in name of Patiala Cluster of Cutting Tools allotted by PSIEC Manufacturers submitted. The land has been allotted on iii. Valuation and its basis PSIEC allotment rate @Rs. 3300/- per sq. lease hold basis for yd. a period of 99 years. iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use No vi. If on lease, duration of 99 years lease hold basis by PSIEC, lease Chandigarh subject to payment of remaining payments in 6 installments. (renewable for another 99 years) vii Whether lease is Yes legally tenable (d.) Total Building area(sq 9300 sq.ft -- ft) (e.) Rate of construction of Rs. 1695/- per sq.ft. complete in all respects -- building including cost of electrification, sanitary expenses, contractor expenses, taxes etc., including boundary wall, gates, grills, shutters. (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Carbide Cutting Tool Section  Gear Hobbing Section  Tool Room (g.) Prod capacity of CFC Workshop Shed: 4,340 sq. ft. (h.) Major Outputs/ Particulars Before CFC After CFC Deliverables of CFC, No. of units 84 Approx. 95-100

123

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks Projected performance of Turnover Rs. 250.00 Rs. 500.00 the cluster after proposed (Rs. in crore) intervention (in terms of Export Rs. 25.00 Rs. 75.00 production, export/domestic (Rs. in crore) sales and direct/indirect Employment About 3000 Nos. About 4000 Nos. employment, etc.) (i.) Pollution clearance Submitted Submitted required or not (j.) Man Power in CFC The total manpower requirement for the -- project would be about 35 persons. (k.) Revenue generation In this DPR, estimates of income are Submitted mechanism for sustainability projected on the basis of user charges to be of assets(service/user levied for provisions of various inputs and charges to be levied, any services to SPV member units and other other-to be specified) cluster firms. The major income sources are envisaged by way of provision of 5 axis CNC tool and cutter grinder machines for manufacturing and re-sharpening of standard & complex tools; 4 axis CNC hob relief profile grinding machine for manufacturing of all kinds of different hob types with top quality products and minimum cycle time, CNC precision measuring centre, tool room machines including wire cuts EDM, CNC surface grinder, CNC vertical milling centre, and CNC turning centre.

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address M/s Patiala Cluster of Cutting Tools -- Manufacturers Forum, 23-A,Factory Area, Patiala,147001 (b.) Nature of SPV(company Company Act,2013 -- or Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the state Govt. GM-DIC, Patiala; Director, MSME-DI, -- and MSME officials in SPV Ludhiana (d.) Date of formation of 11.02.2021 -- SPV (e.) Number of Members 23 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and Yes -- AOA submitted (g.) Authorized Share Rs. 142.76 lacs -- Capital (h.) Paid up capital as Rs. 48.30 lac -- on...... (i.) Shareholding Pattern All the 23 SPV members have allocated 621 Submitted shares each, out of total equity of Rs. 142.76 124

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks lakh i.e. equal share of 4.348%. (j.) Commitment letter for Submitted Submitted contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c Submitted Submitted (l.) Trust Building of SPV,  Written confirmation has been received -- Previous track record of co- from 56 cluster members w.r.t. their operative initiatives pursued willingness to use the CFC facilities. by SPV members need to  Visit to MacAuto expo. Joint meetings be highlighted with support amongst cluster members, with DIC as documentation well as MSME officials for trust building of SPV. (m.) Technical Institution Nearest Technical Institution, Central Tool -- Room, Ludhiana (Punjab) (n.) CFC may be utilized by Written confirmation has been received from Submitted SPV members as also others 56 cluster members w.r.t. their willingness to in a cluster. However, use the CFC facilities. evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) -- (a) Power requirement for 178.30 -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water For human consumption -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities coolants, cutting oil --

4. Implement Arrangements Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Implementing Agency Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), As per guidelines (b.) Fund receiving Agency Chandigarh (c.) Implementation Period 24 months Within 24 months from the date of final approval letter. (d.) Appraisal of DPR and Submitted Received main Recommendations (e.) Comments of Technical TEAC recommended the proposal Division (f.) Approval of Technical

125

Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division (h.) Working capital (In- The CFC is proposing to approach PNB -- principle sanction of loan Focal Point, Patiala for availing Working from a bank, if applicable Capital Limits. Working capital requirement arrangement made) is Rs.9.98 lakh during the first year. 5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) BEP 43.08% As per SIDBI, 25.74% (b.) IRR, Payback period 17.26%, 2 years 10 months As per SIDBI, 15.15% (after tax) (c.) DSCR N.A. -- (d.) Return on Capital  Based on contribution of SPV members As per SIDBI, 38.23% employed (ROCE) only -31.41%  Based on contribution of SPV members plus grant from Central Govt. - 12.76% (e.) NPV 418.40 As per SIDBI, Before tax-Rs. 672.00 lakh (positive) After tax- Rs. 356.17 lakh (positive) (f.) DER - -- (g.) Sensitivity Analysis  10% drop in C.U. ---- BEP 43.81%, -- ROCE 31.92%, IRR 13.94%  10% drop in User Charges -- BEP 49.20%, ROCE 31.77%, IRR 14.13% (h.) Status of CFCs  One CFC is partially operational -- approved in the State  1st installment of GoI has been released for one CFC.  Two CFCs have been accorded Final approval.  One CFC has been accorded In-principle approval

6. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed Recommended by by IA SIDBI/ As per MSE- CDP (i) Land and its Development 72.65 72.65 (ii) Building (Civil and Structural works) 157.59 157.59 (iii) Plant & Machinery 1071.34 1071.34 126

(iv) Misc. Fixed Assets 40.15 40.15 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, maximum 24.70 24.70 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% Building and 5% on Plant and 58.75 58.75 Machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 2.50 2.50 Total 1427.68 1427.68 7. Proposed means of finance: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed by IA Recommended by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1284.91 1142.14 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Punjab 0.00 142.77 (iii) SPV contribution 142.77 142.77 Total 1427.68 1427.68

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification) (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Description No. Power Cost Requirement (HP/KW) 1. 5 Axis CNC Tool & Cutter Grinder 1 120 184.06 2. Wheel Dressing Centre (diamond wheel max. dia x 1 2.50 15.05 width x bore (150x20x20 mm), spindle speed 1400 rpm, radius 0.2 to 7R), rotary table rotation +180 to - 90°, projector head 400 mm dia with 20x magnification optics. 3. CNC Hob Relief Profile Grinding Machine, 4 Axis 1 10 328.04 Machine, maximum module 12, maximum work dia 200, maximum work length 250, suitable for manufacturing products AA, AAA. 4. CNC Precision Measuring Center, work dia 300 mm, 1 1.30 267.71 work length 450 mm, work piece weight 100 kg, 3 Axis (XYZ) 5. Wire Cut Machines (with helical/ fine cuttings), job 1 10 42.72 size 400x500x250 mm with programmable flushing, pulse generator with offline system software, dielectric unit, mineral bed filtration system, refrigerated re- circulated liquid chiller, and standard accessories and installation kit along with 15 KVA Servo Stabilizer and Adjustable bridge component, round job holder and harmonic filter. 6. Band Saw Cutting Machine (semi automatic upto 500 1 8.50 12.25 mm) along with accessories, Roller Table, Variable Vice Pressure, Chip conveyor, Anti Vibration 7. Drill Machine Radial 1 2.00 1.55 8. EDM machine, Electrode machine for Dye-sinking, 1 5.00 11.55 along with EDM oil and Stabiliser 5 KVA

127

S. No. Description No. Power Cost Requirement (HP/KW) 9. 2D/ 3D Laser Scanner 1 1.00 36.40 10. CNC Surface Grinder, Table size 1500 x 600 mm, 1 10.00 63.65 travel 1600/660/600 (X/Y/Z), Spindle speed 1740 rpm, cross feed 1250 x 1500 mm per minute, 11. CNC Vertical Milling Centre (VMC) -- Travels X / Y 1 40.00 50.54 /Z 762 /406/508 mm, Table size 900/350 mm, Spindle (RPM min 1000, type - inline direct drive, power - 22.4 KW), Automatic Tool Changer (ATC-30) 12. CNC Turning Centre, along with accessories Bar 1 20.00 30.95 feeder, Chip conveyor, part catcher, 300 mm length 13. CNC Turning Centre along with accessories Chip 1 25.00 26.87 conveyor, centre-to-centre 500 mm length Total 1071.34

9. Observations:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:

(i) Comments of Senior Most Technical Officer of MSME-DO.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Cutting Tools Cluster, Patiala, Punjab at a total project cost of Rs. 1427.68 lakh with Gol assistance of Rs. 1142.14 lakh, State Govt. contribution of Rs. 142.77 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 142.77 lakh.

***********

128

Agenda No. 54.3.24: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu. Background

 Proposal was deliberated by Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) in its 73rd meetings held on 17.08.2020 and Committe recommended the same to place before Steering Committee for final approval.  Vide letter dated 19.11.2020, TANSIDCO, Chennai has forwarded the following documents submitted and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Registered land document in the name of SPV for a minimum To be submitted period of 30 years. (ii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. As per TANSIDCO letter dated 19.11.20 project is under white category (iii) Details of shareholding pattern of SPV members. Received (iv) Project Appraisal Report. Received (v) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Received (vi) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 Received percent of installed capacity. (vii) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the cost Received escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (viii) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units in the Received cluster are Micro / SC/ST / Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (ix) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC To be submitted guidelines. (x) Details of SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act with MoA To be submitted & AoA (xi) Details of Bank account of implementing Agency. To be submitted (xii) Tangible outcomes such as number of units, turnover, export, Received employment etc. in the format provided.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster : Jewellery Cluster, District : Tirunelveli Location of Cluster : Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu Lok Sabha Constituency : Tirunelveli Main Product : The units in the cluster have expertise in making of traditional gold jewellery. This includes rings, filigree, chains, bangles, diamond jewellery, special/auspicious items and stone setting. No. of Enterprises including Micro : 1050 break up (Micro, Small, Medium) Turnover(Rs in Crore) for the last Year Amount five years : 2014-15 : 18.00 2015-16 : 19.20 2016-17 : 20.40 2017-18 : 21.60 2018-19 : 22.80

Exports(Rs in Crore) for the last Nil 129 five years Employment in Cluster : Direct Employment- 2500 Indirect Employment- 6000 Technology Details : The cluster is predominately using traditional / manual processes for various operations. Whether DS Conducted : Yes. Main findings of DSR :  The Gold Jewellery as an industry is Nellai is historic time immemorial.  There are about 1000 Gold smith workshop units and 50 supporting units in the cluster.  All the cluster units are Micro Enterprises.  The technological upgradation is low at present, but the units have shown the keen interest of the units on modernization.  The industry is facing labour problems, increase in price of raw material and no proper awareness of market potential.  The cluster units are having direct consumers however the same is on decline due to competition from organized sector (retail).  The annual business turnover of the cluster production is around Rs.18.00 cr. Main Problems of Cluster :  Disproportionate need for capital for raw material.  Lacuna of business literacy.  Competition from technology supported manufacturing voluminous.  Increasing market share of organized retails. Other Information : --

2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC The Cluster is using conventional Manual -- Technology. To compete with large corporates, Goldsmith Units require High Quality and Wide range of product manufacturing, design and Skill upgradation and Technology Interventions, Quality Assurance and Product Standardisations. (b.) Location of CFC Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu -- % age of units in radius of 1000 Nos. -- 5km % age of units in radius of 1050 Nos. -- 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired NA Notarized lease ii. Title is in name of NA deed documents of building in the iii. Valuation and its basis NA name of SPV is iv. Land is sufficient Yes Provided, same should be v. Change of land use NA registered. vi. If on lease, duration of 30 (As per Lease agreement) (If land is on lease lease basis, registered lease deed for vii Whether lease is legally Yes minimum 30 years tenable is required). 130

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 6555 (As per Lease Agreement) -- (e.) Rate of construction of NA -- building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  CAD/CAM Facilities --  Hallmarking Facility (BIS)  Testing Facility  Product Design & Development facility  Laser Welding  Laser CNC cutting  Modern universal work benches  Laser marking facility  Die press unit and Casting facility (g.) Prod capacity of CFC -- (h.) Major Outputs/ Particulars Before After -- Deliverables of CFC, Projected CFC CFC performance of the cluster after Turnover 2280.00 2622.00 proposed intervention (in terms (Rs. in lakh) of production, export/domestic Production 15 20 sales and direct/indirect (In MT) employment, etc.) Employment 2500 3000

(i.) Pollution clearance required NA Required or not (j.) Man Power in CFC 45 Nos. -- (k.) Revenue generation Service Charges for various uses from -- mechanism for sustainability of Design, Training, Testing, Precision Cutting, assets(service/user charges to Product Development, Standardisation be levied, any other-to be specified) (l.)

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Name and Address Nellai Jewellery Manufacturing Cluster -- Private Limited, Address – 118/10, Veerakerala Perun Street, Tirunveli Town, District - Tirunveli, Tamil Nadu - 627006 (b.) Nature of SPV(company or Pvt. Ltd, Company (SPV has applied for -- Society or Trust) change to Section 8 Company) (c.) Name of the state Govt. and Not Provided -- MSME officials in SPV (d.) Date of formation of SPV 12/09/2018 -- (e.) Number of Members 51 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA Yes Details of SPV submitted formation in Section-8 of Company Act with MoA & AoA is required. (g.) Authorized Share Capital SPV has indicated that necessary promoters -- contribution would be raised by it by way of 131

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks an equal contribution from all the members (h.) Paid up capital -- -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern Given -- (j.) Commitment letter for Given -- contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c HDFC Bank, Branch Sripuram Tirunelveli -- CTO Building, Tirunelveli Account Number: 50200034221548 (l.) Trust Building of SPV, -- -- Previous track record of cooperative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution -- -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by Scanned copy of letter 23.10.20 has been -- SPV members as also others in received from SPV, certifying that at least a cluster. However, evidence 60% of the installed capacity will be utilized should be furnished with regard by SPV members. to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.) (a) Power requirement for 184.50 KW -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water 10 Litres -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities -- --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Implementing Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development As per guidelines Corporation Limited, Chennai (b.) Fund receiving Agency Tamilnadu Small Industries Development Corporation Limited, Chennai (c.) Implementation Period 12 months from the date of final approval of NLSC (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main SIDBI Appraisal Report Appraisal report is Recommendations received. (e.) Comments of Technical -- -- Division (f.) Approval of Technical -- Recommended by Committee Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC). (h.) Working capital (In- -- -- principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

132

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) BEP 29.78% -- (b.) IRR, Payback After Tax- 14.61% -- period (c.) DSCR NA, as no term loan component envisaged in project. -- (d.) Return on Capital 37.85% -- employed (ROCE) (e.) NPV Before Tax – Rs. 315.50 lakh -- After Tax – Rs. 162.83 lakh (f.) DER NA, as no term loan component envisaged in project. -- (g.) Sensitivity Base decreasing increasing decreasing -- Analysis (Rs. in lakh) case Sales & raw production job material cap income by cost by utilization by DSCR NA NA NA NA BEP 29.78% 34.18% 29.78% 29.78% Cash BEP 11.86% 13.60% 11.86% 11.85% ROCE 32.03% 24.99% 32.03% 20.32% IRR (before 18.41% 14.75% 18.41% 11.81% tax) IRR (before 14.61% 11.62% 14.61% 9.26% tax) NPV 315.50 171.51 315.50 64.18 (before tax) NPV (After 162.83 55.29 162.83 -24.75 tax) Profitability 1.43 1.23 1.43 1.09 index (before tax) Profitability 1.22 1.08 1.22 0.97 index (before tax)

(h.) Status of CFCs 24 CFCs completed, 19 ongoing -- approved in the State

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per MSE- by SIDBI CDP 1 Building (on lease) 2.00 2.00 2.00 2 Plant and Machinery including MFA, 692.00 692.00 692.00 Installation, Taxes / Duties, etc. 3 Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses 14.57 14.57 14.57 4 Contingencies 5.00 5.00 5.00 5 Working Capital 34.60 34.60 34.60 Total Project Cost 748.17 748.17 748.17

133

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Amount Recommended As per MSE- by SIDBI CDP 1 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 598.54 598.53 598.53 2 Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 74.82 74.82 74.82 3 SPV contribution 74.81 74.82 74.82 Total 748.17 748.17 748.17

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

S. No Machine Name Qty Amount (Rs in Lakh ) 1 CAD 3 25.37 2 CAM 1 17.36 3 CAM CPU 4 3.56 4 CAM UPS 1 3.56 5 Camera box + Camera 1 7.60 6 Rubber Mould 1 1.57 7 Liquid rubber mixing setup 1 1.96 8 Rubber mould cutting bench 2 0.16 9 Wax Injection 1 20.11 10 Wax cleaning / tree making 2 0.24 11 Wax setting bench 6 0.72 12 Investment mixer 5 Flask Machine 1 14.69 13 Burnout Furnace of capacity 12 flask 1 3.97 14 Burnout Furnance small furnance 1 2.38 15 Casting machine 1 38.72 16 Casting machine voltage stabliser 1 0.31 17 Water Jet 1 2.76 18 Liquid Honning 1 13.09 19 Sprue Grinding Machine 2 3.18 20 Rolling Mill (Only Sheet of 10") 1 8.72 21 Filing Work Bench with DC 6 8.35 22 Foredom motor 5 1.24 23 Bench light 5 0.40 24 Filing QC Table 1 0.28 25 Filing QC Light 1 0.15 26 Gms weighing scale 1 0.61 27 Microbrazer 1 4.01 28 Magnetic Polish 1 2.56 29 Vibrator 1 1.99 30 Micro Setting Table with DC 5 2.38 31 Normal Setting table 5 2.71 32 Microscope and GRS tools 2 16.91 33 Micro Motor 5 1.51 34 Bench light 5 0.40 35 Bench grinder for Gravers 1 1.77 36 Setting QC Table 2 0.75 37 Setting QC Light 2 0.16 38 CTS weighing scale 1 1.19 39 Laser Welder 1 20.92 40 Laser welder voltage stabiliser 1 0.18 41 Stone Fitting Machine 1 2.97 42 Polishing single station 1 1.19 43 Polishing 2 stations with DC 2 2.85 44 Electro polish 1 16.20 134

S. No Machine Name Qty Amount (Rs in Lakh ) 45 Rhodium plating setup 1 3.03 46 Gold plating setup 1 3.03 47 Sand blasting machine 1 1.19 48 Enamel setup 1 4.72 49 Laser marker 1 53.23 50 Laser marker CPU 1 0.89 51 Laser marker UPS 1 0.89 52 Final QC Table 2 0.75 53 Final QC Light 2 0.16 54 Final QC supervisor Table 1 0.37 55 CTS weighing scale 1 1.19 56 Settling Tank 2 1.60 57 Hot Plate 5 0.13 58 Ultrasonic 3 1.98 59 Steam 1 3.97 60 Induction Melting machine 2Kg 1 3.93 61 Chiller for induction melting 1 0.56 62 Issue Receipt CPU 4 3.56 63 Weighing scale 2 1.98 64 XRF 1 38.99 65 XRF CPU 1 0.89 66 Compressor 1 7.92 67 DG sets +Solar 1 12.64 68 Vaccum cleaner 4 0.48 69 Washing machine 1 0.45 70 CCTV system 1 5.34 71 Fire Alarm 1 3.56 72 Wire Drawing 12 Pass 1 6.36 73 Bead and bead chain Making Machine 1 76.55 74 Bead faceting 1 12.73 75 Continuous Casting Machine - 1 32.94 76 Rolling Mill (3-Bed) 1 7.92 77 Hydraulic Press 150 ton 1 8.00 78 Annealing furnace 1 20.83 79 Circular saw Blade 1 0.93 80 Belt Furnance for continous braze soldering 1 40.95 81 Tikli making Machine 1 1.60 82 Electrical Works 29.58 83 Chain Macking Machines of Multiple Types 1 34.47 Total 692.00

9. Observation:

Following documents are to be submitted prior to issue of final approval letter:

(i) Registered land document in the name of SPV. (ii) SPV formation in Section-8 of Company Act with MoA & AoA (iii) Compliance of all requirements/provisions/columns of online application as per guidelines including conditions imposed by TEAC. (iv) Uploading of SPV members details on MSE-CDP Portal. (v) Opening of Project specific Bank Account in Schedule A Bank by IA.

135

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Jewellery Cluster, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu at a total project cost of Rs.748.17 lakh with GoI grant of Rs.598.53 lakh, State Government’s contribution of Rs.74.82 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs.74.82 lakh.

*********

136

Agenda No. 54.3.25: Proposal for Final approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Mandapally, Siddipet District, Telangana.

Background

(i) Proposal was accorded In-principle approval during the 70th Techno Economic Appraisal Committee (TEAC) held on 20.12.19, subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.

(ii) Vide letter dated 01.09.20, MSME-DI, Hyderabad submitted the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval:

Documents required Status (i) As agreed upon by State Government, letter Vide letter dated 26.02.20, Govt. of regarding enhancement of State share to 30% as Telangana has agreed to contribute in the case of earlier projects. the enhanced contribution. (ii) Registered land documents in the name of Received Implementing Agency (IA) with clear title, complying zoning regulations and non- agricultural conversion etc. (iii) Copy of approved layout plan Received (iv) SIDBI Appraisal Report Received (v) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed Received. format. (vi) Commitment letter from IA to meet the cost Received escalation, if any, over and above the approved project cost (vii) Certificate from State Government / IA that Received more than 50% plots developed would be allotted to established Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (viii) Certificate from State Government for Received compliance of GFR/CVC guidelines. (ix) Comments of Economic Officer from MSME- Received DI, Hyderabad regarding the project proposal.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Pre-registration Information

Name of Organization : Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited. State : Telangana District : Siddipet. Industrial Estate : Industrial Park at Mandapally

2. Basic Information about Proposal:

Particulars Description Whether appraised DPR with approved layout Yes. plan Total Area of industrial estate/ area (acre) 319.64 acres. Area to be developed (acre) 52.88 acres. Number and sizes of plots developed Total no. of plots – 79

137

Particulars Description Plot Size (acre.) No. of plots 0.25 - 0.30 53 0.31 – 0.50 22 0.51 – 0.80 04 Total No. of Plots 79 Implementing Period 24 months Other ID projects sanctioned in same district: Nil year of sanction, number of plots allotted, units set up, etc. Performance of ID projects in State Completed Infrastructure Development (ID) Projects: (i) Industrial Estate at Madikonda Village, Warangal District (ID-New). Ongoing Infrastructure Development (ID) Projects: (ii) Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District (ID-New). (iii) ID centre at Ravalkole (V), Medchal – Malkajgiri. (iv) Up-gradation of Industrial Parks at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy District. (v) Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District. (vi) New Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy District. (vii) New Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon District. (viii) New Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam District. (ix) New Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally village, Peddapalli District. (x) Industrial Infrastructure development Centre (IIDC) at Armoor (V&M).

3. Details about Proposal:

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Implementing Agency (IA) Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure As per MSECDP Corporation limited (TSIIC Ltd.), guidelines Hyderabad. Track Record of the IA Satisfactory -- Appraisal by SIDBI Submitted Received. (Observations and recommendations). Attach SIDBI report. Whether sufficient facilities Yes, Proposed site for establishing industrial -- available at site. (Proximity to park is near Mandapally village, Siddipet railway stations / state Urban Mandal in Siddipet district of highways, availability of water Telangana state. supply, adequate power supply, telecom facilities, dwelling The project site is located near Mandapally places of workers) village of State Highway 1 at a distance of 5 km and 3 kms from major district road.

The nearest railway station to the project site is Jangaon, located approximately at a distance of 45 km. However, a new Greenfield rail line is being laid (Gajewl- 138

Description Proposed by Implementing Agency (IA) Remarks Siddipet-Karimnagar) passing nearer to the site

The nearest airport to the project site is the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport at Hyderabad located at 150 km southwest of project site. Water for the proposed industrial park can be sourced from (1) Devadula Canal (2) Mission Bhagiratha Pipeline. Whether land is in possession Implementing Agency (TSIIC) is already in Received in the name of IA with Clear possession of land required for the Title development of all infrastructure facilities with clear title. Whether Zoning regulations Yes. and non-agricultural conversion etc complied with) Whether State Level Yes, State level committee to coordinate and Constituted Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of monitor progress has been the project has been constituted. Constituted Whether confirmation received Yes. Received form IA that it will meet the cost in excess of approved project cost and any escalation in cost Basis of elements of project Yes cost estimates have been made based on Not received. Cost approved SSR rates schedules GoTs.

Tangible Outcomes of the As per SIDBI Report: project Description Before After Units - 79 Investment (Rs. in - 1975 crore) Aggregate - 3555 Employment in Nos. (Direct – 1205 & (Direct / Indirect) Indirect-2370) Expected turnover - 27.65 (Rs. in crore). Justification of the Proposal The development of IP Mandapally for MSEs in agriculture & allied sectors is expected to induce investments essentially through new entrants in the region. The development of infrastructure in IP AT Mandapally will facilitate setting up of new units in the allotted plots i.e. 79 units with investments of Rs. 19.75 crore and 1185 direct & 2370 Indirect employment opportunity by the year 2025.

4. Proposed Project Cost: (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP / Cost by Recommended by IA SIDBI 1 Land Development and Other Overhead Infrastructure

139

S. No. Particulars Proposed As per MSE-CDP / Cost by Recommended by IA SIDBI (i) Cost of land filling/leveling including boundary wall 96.30 96.30 / fencing (ii) Cost of laying roads 203.88 200.00 (iii) Road side greenery & social forestry 9.29 9.29 (iv) Water supply including overhead tanks, and pump 114.74 110.00 houses (v) Water harvesting 9.54 9.54 (vi) Drainage (Internal) 78.75 60.00 (vii) Power (Sub-Station and distribution net-work work 252.00 250.00 including Street light etc), Generation of non- conventional energy. (viii) Others (Sanitary Conveniences, etc.) 10.00 10.00 Sub Total 774.50 745.13 2 Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative Office Building 19.95 19.95 (ii) Documentation Centre 17.65 17.65 (iii) Conference Hall/ Exhibition centre 26.49 26.49 (iv) Bank/ Post Office 17.65 17.65 (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets 29.46 29.46 (vi) First Aid Centre, Crèche, Canteen facilities 17.65 17.65 Sub Total 128.85 128.85 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 75.00 75.00 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative expenses 29.27 20.00 Total 1007.62 968.98

5. Proposed means of finance (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars As per MSE-CDP / Recommended by SIDBI (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 678.28* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 329.34 Total 1007.62 * GoI grant of Rs. 678.28 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.968.98 lakh.

6. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Mandapally, Siddipet District, Telangana at a total project cost of Rs. 1007.62 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 678.28 lakh & State Government contribution of Rs. 329.34 lakh . 140

***** Agenda No. 54.3.26: Proposal for final approval for setting up Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Terracotta Pottery Cluster, Bhathat & Chargawan Blocks, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. Background

 Proposal was granted In-principle approval in the 51st Steering Committee Meeting (SCM) held on 12.09.19 subject to submission of requisite documents prior to final approval.  Vide email dated 04.12.20, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India (EDII), Gorakhpur forwarded the following documents and requested to consider the proposal for final approval.

Documents required Status (i) Enhancement of Government of Uttar Pradesh grant towards the GoUP share is still project, to that extent GoI grant would be reduced. same. No share enhancement has been done. (ii) Registered land document in the name of SPV (if land is on SPV has submitted lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 unregistered lease years.). deed. Registered lease deed is required. (iii) SIDBI Appraisal Report. Provided (iv) Details of Revenue generation mechanism. Provided (v) NOC from State Pollution Control Board. Required (vi) Copy of Article of Association and Memorandum of Provided Association. (vii) Commitment letter from SPV for their contribution. Provided (viii) Details of SPV’s bank account/ Mandate form. Bank mandate form is required. (ix) Commitment letter from State Government / SPV to meet the Provided escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (x) Commitment letter from SPV members to utilise at least 60 Provided percent of installed capacity. (xi) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ Required CVC guidelines. (xii) No. of beneficiary units (SPV members) should be enhanced Required and list of members to be provided.

Details of the proposal are as under:

1. Basic Information of Cluster

Name of Cluster Terracotta Pottery Cluster District Gorakhapur Location of Cluster Bhathat & Chargawan Blocks Lok Sabha Constituency Gorakhpur Main Product Decorative Terracotta items, Pottery Traditional items, Terracotta Kitchen items, Terracotta worship items. No. of Enterprises including Micro-200 break up (Micro, Small, Medium) Turnover for the last five years Year (Rs. in crore) 141

2014-15 : 1.62 2015-16 : 1.84 2016-17 : 2.00 2017-18 : 2.16 2018-19 : 2.26

Exports for the last five years Nil (Rs in Crore) Employment in Cluster Direct- 640 Indirect- 2500 Technology Details Ball Mill, Pug Mill, Electric Pottery wheel, Electric Furnace etc Whether DS Conducted Aurangbad, Gulariya, Bharwalia, Jungle Akla etc by EDII Main findings of DSR In Gorakhpur Terracotta Pottery Cluster, there are 200 (two hundred) principal firms which are producing terracotta house hold goods. However, these are all individuals who make their own separate efforts to achieve their own bits of success, and there is hardly any association between them. They have not received any grants or monetary support from either the State or the Central governments, and handle all their manufacturing needs personally. Due to the lack of any industrial infrastructural basis, they still need to seek assistance from Thangadh, Delhi, etc. for issues regarding mould-making, tool-making, or machinery repairing. The presence of an unifying infrastructural body that provides these services, along with the establishment of a design facility providing instant digital rendering of designs provided by stakeholders and manufacturing of moulds and tools through CAD/CAM technology, shall allow these individuals to pool in their efforts and interests and bring about rapid and progressive development in the pottery industry of Uttar Pradesh. Main Problems of Cluster The variety of products and the process required to produce those items have made the units of this cluster prone to facing various bottleneck. Basically all the plant and equipments installed in different units in individual level are procured from different regions of India who might not have service centers even in the state capital, Lucknow. Other Information Any sort of setback due to malfunction / breakage of component of those machines lead to serious implications on the output performance of the factories. In addition to this the general development of ancillaries in this cluster locality is dismal due to absence of corporate manufacturing / engineering industry. 2. Information about Proposed CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks (a.) Justification for CFC The Common Facility Centre, to be done by -- Gorakhpur Terracotta Vikas Sahkari Samiti, Gulhariya, Gorakhpur is going to play the most vital role in the cluster development in the true sense of the word. The role of CFC starts from providing DESIGN SERVICE to the stakeholders. It will maintain an ARCHIVE of traditional and innovative designs of numerous household articles, brought by the stakeholders. Another very important role of CFC is going to help the stakeholders get high quality moulds/tooling at cheaper rates than what they are presently getting from Kolkata and also helping them in maintenance of their existing machineries 142

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks ad moulds as and when required. The CFC will play a very important role in overall economic development of this cluster as the economy of Gulariya-has been considerably dependant on this terracotta cluster. Once with the valuable support from the CFC the stakeholder-members of the SPV can start growing economically, and non-member manufacturers will become members to be a part of this economic growth process. (b.) Location of CFC Aaurangabad, Gulariya, Bharwaliya, Jungle Akla etc villages under Bhatahat and Chargawan Blocks Dist Gorakhpur of Uttar Pradesh. This cluster is located at a distance of 25 km approx from the district headquarter of Gorakhpur on Gorakhpur Maharajganj road NH 24. The distance of the state capital Lucknow is 290 km. However Lucknow is well connected to this place by road and rail. Also this cluster is having road/rail connectivity with all most all parts of the country as well as neighboring country Nepal % age of units in radius of 5km 80 % age of units in radius of 20 10km (c.) Land for CFC i. Whether land acquired Lease land Land lease deed is not registered. ii. Title is in name of Gorakhpur Terracotta Vikas Sahkari Samiti, Registered lease Gulhariya, Gorakhpur deed is required. iii. Valuation and its basis NA iv. Land is sufficient Yes v. Change of land use NA vi. If on lease, duration of lease NA vii Whether lease is legally NA tenable (d.) Total Building area(sq ft) 6200 sq. ft. -- (e.) Rate of construction of NA -- building (f.) Main Facility Proposed  Computer Aided Product and Tool Design  Product Model Making  Raw Material Making & Colour Making  Workshop  Store & Tool Room  Testing Laboratory  Training Centre  Information Hub (g.) Prod capacity of CFC Year wise capacity chart -- (h.) Major Outputs / S. No. Particulars Before CFC After CFC Deliverables of CFC, Projected (i) No. of units 200 (micro) 316 performance of the cluster after (ii) Turnover Rs. 2.26 crore Rs. 5.00 crore 143

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency (IA) Remarks proposed intervention (in terms (iii) Export Rs. 0.02 crore Rs. 0.50 crore of production, export/domestic (iv) Employment 3140 4900 sales and direct/indirect employment etc.) (i.) Pollution clearance required Eco friendly products. Required or not (j.) Man Power in CFC Manpower requirements and establishment -- expenses (k.) Revenue generation Rate of Return, Payback period % net Provided mechanism for sustainability of present value assets(service/user charges to be levied, any other-to be specified)

3. Information about SPV

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Name and Address Gorakhpur Terracotta Vikas Sahkari -- Samiti, Gulhariya, Gorakhpur (b.) Nature of SPV(company or Cooperative Society -- Society or Trust) (c.) Name of the State Govt. and GM-DIC, MSME Required MSME officials in SPV (d.) Date of formation of SPV 24.09.18 -- (e.) Number of Members 21 -- (f.) Bye Laws or MA and AOA Submitted Provided submitted (g.) Authorized Share Capital NA -- (h.) Paid up capital NA -- (i.) Shareholding Pattern SPV share holding pattern submitted -- (j.) Commitment letter for SPV members are agreed. Provided contribution (k.) SPV specific A/c A/c will open. Required (l.) Trust Building of SPV, Good track record -- Previous track record of cooperative initiatives pursued by SPV members need to be highlighted with support documentation (m.) Technical Institution EDII, Design Institute etc -- (n.) CFC may be utilised by 60% of installed capacity Provided SPV members as also others in a cluster. However, evidence should be furnished with regard to SPV member ability to utilise at least 60 percent of installed capacity. (o.)

144

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a) Power requirement for Cost of electricity -- commercial/domestic purpose (b) Water water -- (c) Gas/Oil/Other Utilities generator --

4. Implement Arrangements

Description Proposed by Implementation Agency Remarks (IA) (a.) Implementing Agency Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority -- (UPTPA) (b.) Fund receiving Agency -- (c.) Implementation Period 24 Months 24 months from the date of issuance of final approval letter. (d.) Appraisal of DPR and main Submitted Submitted Recommendations (e.) Comments of Technical TEAC recommended the proposal Division (f.) Approval of Technical Committee (g.) Comments of Cluster Development Division: (h.) Working capital (In- Not applicable -- principle sanction of loan from a bank, if applicable arrangement made)

5. Financial Analysis of CFC

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (a.) BEP 27.49% As per SIDBI BEP in optimum year (FY 2026) = 35.55% (b.) IRR, Payback period 23.26% As per SIDBI IRR (after tax) = 19.37% (c.) DSCR -- -- (d.) Return on Capital 28.17% As per SIDBI employed (ROCE) ROCE in optimum year (FY 2026)= 41.96% Average ROCE = 42.99% (e.) NPV 251.99 lakh As per SIDBI NPV (before tax)= Rs. 196.30 lakh (positive) NPV (after tax)= Rs. 116.73 lakh (positive) (f.) DER -- --

145

Description Proposed by Implementation Remarks Agency (IA) (g.) Sensitivity Analysis -- -- (h.) Status of CFCs approved in 05 CFC projects are being implemented under MSE-CDP. the State

6. Proposed Project Cost is as follow: (Rs. in lakh) Proposed Recommended by SIDBI/ S. No Particulars by IA As per MSE-CDP (i) Land & Site Development 19.72 19.72 (ii) Building & Civil Works 30.00 30.00 (iii) Plant & Machinery 154.08 154.08 (iv) Miscellaneous Fixed Assets 50.56 50.56 (v) Preliminary Expenses 11.25 11.25 (vi) Pre-operative Expenses 6.60 6.60 (vii) Provision for contingencies 5.22 5.22 (viii) Margin money for working capital 5.62 5.62 Total 283.05 283.05

7. Proposed means of finance are as follows: (Rs. in lakh) % Proposed by Recommended S. No. Particulars IA by SIDBI/ As per MSE-CDP (i) Grant from Govt. of India 71.15 201.39 201.39 (ii) Grant from Govt. of UP 13.03 36.87 36.87 (iii) Contribution by Consortium / SPV 15.82 44.79 44.79 Total 100.00 283.05 283.05

8. Plant and machinery (with Brief Specification)

S. No. Name of the machinery Quantity Total Cost (Rs. in lakh) (i) Ball Mill 04 18.03 (ii) De-Airing Pug Mill 03 14.29 (iii) Electric Potter’s Wheel 30 9.90 (iv) Designing Wheel 50 1.27 (v) Complete CAD centre and Model Making Set-up 01 1.91 (vi) Air Compressor with Touch up Spray Gun 05 13.97 (vii) Complete Pottery Tools-Set 100 3.81 (viii) Electric Furnace 05 50.80 (ix) Bore well with Motor & Water storage tank 01 4.76 (x) Power Generator 03 29.53 (xi) 3 phase Electrification 01 5.46 Transportation Cost 0.35 Total 154.08 9. Observations:

Following documents are required to be submitted prior to issuance of final approval letter:

(i) Government of Uttar Pradesh has not enhanced its share. State share is still 13.03%. (ii) Registered land lease deed in the name of SPV. (iii) NOC from State Pollution Control Board.

146

(iv) Details of SPV’s bank account/ Mandate form. (v) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFR/ CVC guidelines. (vi) Inclusion of name of the State Govt. and MSME officials in SPV. (vii) Inclusion of condition in bye-laws that SPV will not eligible for drawing any profit from operation of the CFC and profit generated during the operation shall be ploughed back for further development of CFC. (viii) No. of beneficiary units (SPV members) should be enhanced and list of members to be provided. (ix) Confirmation from State Government regarding Implementing Agency and Fund Receiving Agency for the project. (x) Incorporation of SPV in Section 8 of Company Act.

10. Proposal for Steering Committee:

Committee may consider the proposal for Final Approval for setting up of Common Facility Centre in Terracotta Pottery Cluster, Bhathat & Chargawan Blocks, Gorakhapur, Uttar Pradesh at a total project cost of Rs. 283.05 lakh with GoI assistance of Rs. 201.39 lakh, State contribution of Rs. 36.87 lakh and SPV contribution of Rs. 44.79 lakh.

*****

147

Agenda Item No. 54.4.1: Time Extension for setting up of new Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District, Telangana.

S. No. Description Status 1 Name of the New Industrial Estate at Automotive & Engineering Cluster proposal and Park, Toopran Mandal, Medak District. location 2 Approval accorded 32nd SCM held on 20.03.13. 3 Final approval 21.03.14 order issued on 4 Name of the IA Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC), Hyderabad. 5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 752.65 Govt. of Telangana : 188.17 Total : 940.82 6 Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise S. No. Particulars Approved details Cost

1. Land Development and other overhead Infrastructure i) Cost of land filling/ levelling 100.00 including boundary wall and fencing ii) Cost of laying roads 145.00 iii) Landscaping / Road side 10.00 greenery/ Social forestry iv) Water supply including 110.00 overhead tanks and pump house v) Water harvesting 10.00 vi) Drainage 60.00 vii) Power (Sub-station and 250.00 distribution network work including street light etc.), Generation of non- conventional energy viii) Other (sanitary conveniences 10.00 etc.) Sub Total 695.00 2. Administrative and Other Services Complex (i) Administrative office building 149.11 (ii) Tele-communication / Cyber centre/Documentation centre (iii) Conference Hall / Exhibition centre (iv) Bank / Post office (v) Raw material storage facility, Marketing outlets (vi) First aid centre, Creche, Canteen 3. Effluent Treatment Facilities 78.26 4. Contingencies & Pre-operative 18.45 exp. 148

S. No. Description Status Sub Total 245.82 Total 940.82 7 Total GoI grant Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) released 1st on 28.09.14 : 62.88 2nd on 15.12.17 : 200.00 3rd on 23.07.19 : 400.00 Total : 662.88 8 Project validity 31.12.19 9 Time Extension 31.12.20 sought up to 10 Reason for Delay  The delay in completion of the balance works was mainly due to the non-availability of labour during lock down period, the progress was hampered. The work has resumed after lock down, with minimum labour. 11 Proposal for  Steering Committee may accord Time extension upto Steering 31.12.20. Committee

*********

149

Agenda Item No.54.5.1: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kundli, Sonepat, Haryana.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the Setting up of CFC in Stainless Steel Utensils Cluster, Kundli, proposal and Sonepat, Haryana location 2. Approval accorded 33rd SCM held on 14.06.13 3. Final approval order 09.09.13 issued on 4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1022.54 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00 SPV contribution : 530.78 Total : 1703.32

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Land and its Development 283.50 details (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 216.27 (iii) Plant & Machinery(including 1076.91 electrification) (list of plant and machinery with tentative cost – Annexed) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 20.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, 34.06 maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on 58.16 plant and machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 14.42 Total 1703.32

7. Total GoI grant released Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 409.01 28.08.19 Total 409.01

8. Validity upto 31.01.20 9. Time extension 31.07.21 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file. *******

150

Agenda Item No.54.5.2: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the proposal Setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, Yamunanagar, and location Haryana 2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17 3. Final approval order 04.05.17 issued on 4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1319.00 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00 SPV contribution : 171.00 Total : 1640.00

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise details (i) Land and its Development 113.20 (ii) Building and other Civil Constructions 67.30 (iii) Plant & Machinery (including 1410.43 electrification) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative expenses, 10.00 maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on 29.07 plant and machinery) Total Project Cost 1640.00

7. Total GoI grant released Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 08.08.19 527.60 2nd installment on 31.07.20 395.70 Total 923.30

8. Validity upto 04.05.20 9. Time extension 31.03.21 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

*******

151

Agenda Item No.54.5.3: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, Haryana.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the proposal Setting up of CFC in Engineering Cluster, Yamunanagar, and location Haryana 2. Approval accorded 40th SCM held on 02.07.16 3. Final approval order 06.10.16 issued on 4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1199.45 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 150.00 SPV contribution : 208.00 Total : 1557.45

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Land and its Development 50.00 details (ii) Building and other Civil 150.00 Constructions (iii) Plant & Machinery (including 1295.58 electrification) (Annexure) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 10.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative 30.00 expenses, maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% 15.87 on plant and machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 6.00 Total 1557.45

7. Total GoI grant Rs. in lakh released 1st installment on 18.12.19 479.78 Total 479.78

8. Validity upto 31.03.20 9. Time extension 31.12.21 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

*****

152

Agenda Item No.54.5.4: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of CFC in Plastic Packaging Cluster, Karnal, Haryana.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the proposal Setting up of CFC in Plastic Packaging Cluster, Karnal, and location Haryana 2. Approval accorded 46th SCM held on 09.02.18 3. Final approval order 11.04.18 issued on 4. Name of the IA Bureau of Industrial Policy and Promotion (BIPP), Chandigarh (then Investment Promotion Centre) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1050.00 Govt. of Haryana Grant : 371.54 SPV contribution : 221.54 Total : 1643.08

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Land and its Development 221.64 details (ii) Building and other Civil 331.14 Constructions (iii) Plant & Machinery (including 918.32 electrification) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 13.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative 89.87 expenses, maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% 46.67 on plant and machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 22.44 Total 1643.08

7. Total GoI grant Rs. in lakh released 1st installment on 06.09.19 420.00 2nd installment on 19.11.20 315.00 Total 735.00

8. Validity upto 11.04.20 9. Time extension 30.06.21 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

*****

153

Agenda Item No. 54.5.5: Ratification of Time Extension granted for Up-gradation of ID Plots at Edayar, Ernakulam District, Kerala.

S. No. Description Status 1 Name of the proposal Up-gradation of ID Plots at Edayar, Ernakulam District. and location 2 Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17. 3 Final approval order 03.05.17 issued on 4 Name of the IA Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (KBIP), Thiruvananthapuram is the fund receiving and executing agency for the project. However, Implementing Agency (IA) for the project will be Directorate of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Kerala. 5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 580.614 Govt. of Kerala : 387.076 Total : 967.690 6 Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise details S. Particulars Approved No. Cost 1.(i) Cost of Land filling/leveling 0.00 including boundary wall and fencing: (ii) Laying roads 661.83 (iii) Road side greenery & social 4.98 forestry (iv) Drainage 182.77 (v) Power (Sub-Station and 98.24 distribution net-work work including street light etc), Generation of non-conventional energy. 2. Contingencies & Pre operative 19.87 expenses : Total 967.69

7 Total GoI grant Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) released 1st on 16.01.19 : 200.00 Total : 200.00 8 Validity upto 02.05.19 9 Time extension 31.03.21 accorded on file up to 10 Proposal for Steering  Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time Committee extension accorded on file.

*********

154

Agenda Item No. 54.5.6: Ratification of Time Extension granted for Up-gradation of Industrial Development Project at Poovanthuruthu, Kottayam District, Kerala.

S. No. Description Status 1 Name of the proposal Up-gradation of Industrial Development Project at and location Poovanthuruthu, Kottayam District, Kerala. 2 Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17. 3 Final approval order 03.05.17 issued on 4 Name of the IA Kerala Bureau of Industrial Promotion (KBIP), Thiruvananthapuram is the fund receiving and executing agency for the project. However, Implementing Agency (IA) for the project will be Directorate of Industries and Commerce, Govt. of Kerala. 5 Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 600.00 Govt. of Kerala : 400.00 Total : 1000.00 6 Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise S.No. Particulars Approved details Cost 1.(i) Land filling/levelling 0.00 including boundary wall and fencing: (ii) Laying roads 248.16 (iii) Road side greenery & social 3.67 forestry (iv) Water supply including 117.20 overhead tanks, and pump houses (v) Drainage 142.76 (vi) Power (Sub Station and 225.88 distribution network, work including Street light etc), Generation of non conventional Energy. (vii) Others (Sanitary 120.08 Conveniences etc) 2.(i) Administrative building cum 81.03 documentation centre, Conference Hall. (ii) First Aid centre, Creche, Canteen Facilities etc, Fire 20.97 Protection, Solid Waste Management system, Road side Signage, Bus Shelter. 3 Effluent treatment Facilities 20.25

155

S. No. Description Status 4 Contingencies and Pre- 20.00 operative expenses Total 1000.00 7 Total GoI grant Installment & Date (Rs. in lakh) released 1st on 16.01.19 : 200.00 Total : 200.00 8 Validity upto 02.05.19 9 Time extension 31.03.21 accorded on file up to 10 Proposal for Steering  Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time Committee extension accorded on file.

*********

156

Agenda Item No.54.5.7: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Plastic & Packaging Cluster, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the proposal and Setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Plastic location & Packaging Cluster, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh 2. Approval accorded 45th SCM held on 22.11.17 3. Final approval order issued 23.02.18 on 4. Name of the IA MP Industrial Development Corporation Limited (MPIDC) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 551.00 Govt. of MP : 26.00 SPV contribution : 158.00 Bank loan : 62.50 Total : 797.50

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise details (i) Land and its Development 26.00 (ii) Building and other civil 155.00 constructions (iii) Plant & Machinery (including 531.50 electrification) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 25.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative 16.00 expenses (vi) Contingency (Maximum-2% on 3.00 building) (vii) Contingency (Maximum-5% on 26.00 plant & machinery) (viii) Margin for working capital 15.00 Total 797.50

7. Total GoI grant released Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 220.40 29.12.20 Total 220.40

8. Validity upto 22.02.2020 9. Time extension accorded on 31.03.2021 file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time Committee extension accorded on file. ******

157

Agenda Item No. 54.5.8: Ratification of Time Extension granted for completion of the project for setting up of CFC in Hi-Tech Metal Cluster, Mohali, Punjab.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the proposal Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Hi-Tech and location Metal Cluster, Mohali, Punjab 2. Approval accorded 29th SCM held on 24.02.12 3. Final approval order 03.07.13 issued on 4. Name of the IA Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1106.85 SPV contribution : 160.84 Unsecured Loan from : 140.00 members & others Total : 1407.69

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Land and its Development 220.94 details (ii) Building and other Civil 78.33 Constructions (iii) Plant & Machinery 1004.68 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 24.58 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative 16.40 expenses, maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% 53.04 on plant and machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 9.72 Total 1407.69

7. Total GoI grant Rs. in lakh released 1st installment on 27.12.16 402.74 2nd installment on 03.10.18 332.00 3rd installment on 29.08.19 261.425 4th & final installment 07.01.21 103.23 Total 1099.395

8. Validity upto 30.06.20 9. Time extension 30.11.20 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

*****

158

Agenda Item No. 54.5.9: Ratification of Time Extension granted for completion of project for setting up of CFC in Oil Expeller & Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab.

S. Description Status No. 1. Name of the proposal Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Oil Expeller & and location Parts Manufacturing Cluster, Ludhiana, Punjab 2. Approval accorded 47th SCM held on 25.07.18 3. Final approval order 28.08.18 issued on 4. Name of the IA Policy Implementation Unit (PIU), Chandigarh 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 1350.00 SPV contribution : 168.68 Total : 1518.68

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Building and other Civil 120.00 details Constructions (ii) Plant & Machinery (including 1296.68 electrification) (iii) Misc. fixed assets 18.00 (iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative 15.00 expenses, maximum 2% of project cost (v) Contingency (2% building and 5% 31.00 on plant and machinery) (vi) Margin money for Working Capital 38.00 Total 1518.68

7. Total GoI grant Rs. in lakh released 1st installment on 28.06.19 540.00 2nd installment on 20.01.20 405.00 3rd installment on 04.05.20 270.00 4th & final installment on 07.01.21 120.63 Total 1335.63

8. Validity upto 27.08.20 9. Time extension 31.12.20 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

*****

159

Agenda Item No.: 54.5.10: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Readymade Garments Cluster, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the Setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in proposal and Readymade Garments Cluster, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh location 2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17 3. Final approval order 24.05.17 issued on 4. Name of the IA Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority (UPTPA) 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 497.10 Govt. of Uttar Pradesh : 119.83 SPV contribution : 73.67 Total : 690.60

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Land and its Development 17.54 details (ii) Building and other Civil 151.00 Constructions (iii) Plant & Machinery 462.79 (iv) Misc. fixed assets 4.50 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative 14.45 expenses, maximum 2% of project cost (vi) Contingency (2% building and 5% on 26.16 plant and machinery) (vii) Margin money for Working Capital 14.16 Total 690.60

7. Total GoI grant released Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 198.84 23.10.20 Total 198.84

8. Validity upto 23.05.19 9. Time extension 31.03.21 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

160

Agenda Item No.54.5.11: Ratification of Time Extension granted for setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Zari Zardozi Cluster, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the Setting up of Common Facility Center (CFC) in Zari proposal and Zardozi Cluster, Unnao, Uttar Pradesh location 2. Approval accorded 43rd SCM held on 09.03.17 3. Final approval order 16.05.17 issued on 4. Name of the IA Uttar Pradesh Trade Promotion Authority (UPTPA), Kanpur 5. Means of Finance (Rs. in lakh) Govt. of India Grant : 178.78 Govt. of UP : 22.42 SPV contribution : 22.98 Total : 224.18

6. Project Costs and (Rs. in lakh) component wise (i) Land and its Development 12.00 details (ii) Building and other Civil 33.40 Constructions (iii) Plant & Machinery (including 145.14 electrification) (iv) Misc. fixed assets 12.00 (v) Preliminary & Pre-operative 4.54 expenses (vi) Contingency (2% building & 5% on 7.50 plant & machinery) (vii) Margin money for working capital 9.60 Total 224.18

7. Total GoI grant released Rs. in lakh 1st installment on 71.51 29.12.20 Total 71.51

8. Validity upto 15.05.19 9. Time extension 31.12.21 accorded on file up to 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly ratify the time extension Committee accorded on file.

161

Agenda No.54.6.1: Removal of proposed facilities for setting up of Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha.

S. No. Description Status 1. Name of the proposal and Setting up of Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha location 2. Approval accorded 53rd SCM of MSE-CDP held on 14.07.20 3. Final approval order issued 15.09.2020 on 4. Name of IA Odisha Small Industries Corporation Ltd., Cuttack 5. Means of Finance Rs. in lakh GoI contribution : 1048.62 State Government contribution : 299.61 SPV contribution : 149.80 Total : 1498.03

6. Project costs and (Rs. in lakh) component-wise details (i) Land : 113.17 (ii) Land development & building : 295.40 (iii) Plant & Machinery : 1077.02 (iv) Preliminary & Pre-operative : 12.44 expenses Total : 1498.03

7. Total GoI grant released Nil 8. Facilities approved (i) Solvent extraction from Rice Bran (ii) Extraction of silica from husk ash (iii)Extraction of oryzanol from rice bran oil and other agro products (iv) Setting up of ultra-modern mandis for procurement of paddy and other raw materials as well as sale of rice (v) De-oiled rice bran & Crude Oil and other by- products. (vi) Research and Development centers (vii) Common warehousing, marketing, export and import of finished products and raw material and other such related works as deemed fit by the company from time to time. 9. Facilities proposed to be (i) Extraction of silica from husk ash deleted (ii) Extraction of oryzanol from rice bran oil and other agro products (iii)Setting up of ultra-modern mandis for procurement of paddy and other raw materials as well as sale of rice 10. Proposal for Steering Steering Committee may kindly accorded approval for Committee removal of facilities proposed at para-9.

*****

162

Minutes of 53rd Meeting of National Level Steering Committee of Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP).

In Chair Secretary (MSME)

Date 14.07.2020

Venue Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi (through Video Conferencing)

List of participants annexed at Annexure-I.

The Chairman National Level Steering Committee, while welcoming the participant mentioned that that Micro & Small Enterprises - Cluster Development Programme (MSE-CDP) is an important scheme of this Ministry and the State Governments play very vital role in the implementation of the scheme. Further he remarked that:

(i) State Governments should ensure that the ongoing projects are completed within in the stipulated time period and there should not be any delay in the part of any stakeholders. (ii) The detailing on the progress of completed/ongoing projects needs to be ensured during the deliberations for the new projects.

The Agenda thereafter were taken up.

Agenda Item No. Confirmation of Minutes of previous Steering Committee Meeting 53.1 Minutes were confirmed.

Agenda Item No. Action taken report on previous meeting decisions 53.2 Action taken report was noted.

Agenda Item No. 51.3: Proposals for Final Approval

53.3.1 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) m Jewellery Cluster, Jamnagar, Gujarat. The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh) S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 707.48 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 202.14 (iii) SPV contribution 10 l.07 Total 1010.69

~ j.J) Pa g e 1 of 17 53.3.2 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Copper Utensils Manufacturing Cluster, Nasalapur, Belgaum, Karnataka. The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 576.83 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofKarnataka 164.82 (iii) SPY contribution 82.41 Total 824.06 53.3.3 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Grapes & Raisin Processing Cluster, Jamkhandi, Bagalkot, Karnataka.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter. (Rs. in lakh S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1047.69 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofKarnataka 299.34 (iii) SPY contribution 149.67 Total 1496.70 (i) Registered land documents in the name of SPY (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required) vetted by MSME-DI, Hubli. (ii) English version of registration of SPY formation signed vetted by MEMEDI. (iii) Undertakings from the State Government as well as SPY that CFC will not sell the products.

53.3.4 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Organic Millets Cluster, Davanagere, Karnataka.

~ Page 2 of 17 Total 715.51

(i) Documentary proof from SPY for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51 % of the cluster members. (ii) IA needs to submit plan regarding value addition, branding and marketing tie-up to make the project viable. The above approval is further subjected to: (a) The SPY shall obtain NPOP or PGS Certification as the case may be. 53.3.5 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Power loom Cluster, Chikodi, Belgaum, Karnataka. The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1021.15 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Karnataka 291.76 (iii) Spy contribution 145.88 Total 1458.79

53.3.6 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Steel Furniture Cluster, Ernakulam, Kerala. The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter. (Rs. in lakh S. No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 1050.00 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kerala 300.00 (iii) SPY contribution 241.27 Total 1591.27

(i) English version of registered land documents in the name of SPY vetted by MSME-DI, Thrissur. (ii) Details of SPY bank account is not legible to read. Clear copy required. (iii) Copy of MoA & AoA signed by Board of Directors required. As per SIDBI appraisal, the AoA of Kalady Steel Consortium Private Ltd. does not have provision for enrolling new members into SPY. A suitable condition regarding inclusion of provision for enrolling new members into the company need to be stipulated.

53.3.7 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Auto and Engineering Cluster, Nagpur, Maharashtra .

. ~ Page 3 of 17 The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter. (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 1234.10 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Maharashtra 352.60 (iii) Spy contribution 176.30 Total 1763.00

(i) Certificate from the State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/STlWomen Enterprises, as the case may be. (ii) Certificate from the State Govt.lSPV to utilize 60% of the installed capacity. (iii) Commitment letter from the State Government I IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (iv) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government. 53.3.8 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Rice Milling Cluster, Balasore, Odisha.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1048.62 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Odisha 299.61 (iii) SPY contribution 149.80 Total 1498.03

53.3.9 Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Home Furnishing Cluster, Karur, Tamil Nadu.

(i) Registered land documents in the name of Spy (If land is on lease basis, registered lease deed for a minimum period of 30 years is required).

Page 4 of 17 ~

~!!1 ~ .!> UMESH ChANDRA Sri K ~~~ / 0 -.:;c·or (ii) Certificate from the State Govt.lSPV to utilize 60% of the installed capacity. (iii) Certificate from the State Government that more than 50% units in the cluster are Micro/SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (iv) Certificate from the State Pollution Control Board. (v) Share holding Pattern of SPY. (vi) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government.

53.3.10 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Buggapadu, Khammam, Telangana.

(i) Tangible outcomes of the project In prescribed format from the State Government.

53.3.11 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Kallem, Jangaon, Telangana.

(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government.

53.3.12 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Autonagar, Kundanpally Village, Ramagundam MandaI in Peddapalli , Telangana.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.

Page 5 of17 ~ ~ -q~ ~ • 'MESH C ,AND\<. S >.; ~~ / 0 .",ctor (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 656.62* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 334.13 Total 990.75 * Gol grant ofRs. 656.62 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost ofRs.938.04 lakh.

(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government.

53.3.13 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Autonagar, Hyderabad, Ranga Reddy, Telangana.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 650.65* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 403.61 Total 1054.26 * Gol grant ofRs. 650.65 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost ofRs.929.50 lakh

53.3.14 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Sultanpur, Sangareddy, Telangana.

(i) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from State Government.

53.3.15 Up-gradation of Industrial Park at Bhongir, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri, Telangana.

Page 6 of 17 The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 484.13* (ii) Govt. of Telangana 230.04 Total 714.17 *GoI grant of Rs. 484.13 lakh is 70% of total eligible project cost of Rs.691.61 lakh.

53.3.16 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Borgaon Textile Manufacturing Cluster, Nippani, Belgaum, Karnataka.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 1046.80 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kamataka 299.10 (iii) Spy contribution 149.55 Total 1495.45

53.3.17 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Auto and General Engineering Cluster, Chikkodi, Belgaum, Karnataka.

(i) Documentary proof from Spy for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51 % of the cluster members.

53.3.18 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Readymade Garment & Hosiery Cluster, Hiriyur, Chitradurga, Karnataka.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final

~ Page 7 of 17 approval letter. (Rs. in lakh S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 206.22 (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Kamataka 59.53 (iii) SPY contribution 31.92 Total 297.67

(i) Documentary proof from Spy for utilization of CFC facilities by at least 51 % of the cluster members. (ii) Details of SPY bank account. 53.3.19 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Boranada Phase-IV, Jodhpur, Rajasthan

(i) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.

53.3.20 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Odela, Dholpur, Rajasthan.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter.

(Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 257.06* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 142.98 Total 400.04 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 257.06 lakh as 64.25% of eligible project cost of Rs. 400.04 lakh.

(i) Certificate from State Government that more than 50% units 10 the

Page 8 of 17

~~ ~ 14 1-\ C ANDRAS UME.~~ / 0 recto Industrial Estate are Microl SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (ii) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFRJCVC guidelines.

53.3.21 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Zadri Falna, Pali, Rajasthan.

Total 559.77 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 308.19 lakh as 80% of eligible project cost ofRs. 385.24 lakh.

(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRJ CVC guidelines.

53.3.22 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.

The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance. (Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. oflndia 352.00* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 210.87

Total 562.87 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs.352.00 lakh as 70% of eligible project cost ofRs. 502.88 lakh.

53.3.23 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Bhinmal, Jalore, Rajasthan.

Page 9 of17 cost ofRs. 519.14Iakh.

(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.

53.3.24 (8) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Kekri, Ajmer, Rajasthan.

Total 455.61 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant ofRs. 267.05 lakh as 58.61% of eligible project cost ofRs. 455.61 lakh.

(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.

53.3.25 (8) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Mandore, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

(i) Certificate from the State Government that more than 50% units in the Industrial Estate are Micro/ SC/ST/Women Enterprises, as the case may be. (ii) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.

53.3.26 (8) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Nimbahera, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

'i3"1lw i:f ~ ~- UMESf-i C NORA SHl Page 10 of 17 f~w-..., / ~ - eto The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter. (Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. ofIndia 277.27* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Rajasthan 248.05 Total 525.32 *SlDBl recommended Gol grant of Rs. 277.27 lakh as 52.78% of eligible project cost of Rs. 525.32 lakh.

(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.

53.3.27 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Area Renwal, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

(i) Certificate from the State Government for compliance of GFRlCVC guidelines.

53.3.28(S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Engineering Cluster, Mehsana, Gujarat.

Page 11 of 17 (i) Uploading of SPY members details on MSE-CDP Portal. (ii) Opening of Project Specific Account in schedule A Bank by IA. 53.3.29 (S) Setting up of Common Facility Centre (CFC) in Lab Grown Diamond Cluster, Surat, Gujarat.

(i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. oflndia 1585.36

(ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Gujarat 198.17

(iii) SPY contribution 198.17

Total 1981.70

(i) Opening of Project Specific Account in schedule A Bank by IA.

53.3.30 (S) Up-gradation of Industrial Estate at Uranganpatti, Madurai, Tamil Nadu.

Total 955.00 *SIDBI recommended Gol grant of Rs. 573.00 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost ofRs.955.00 lakh.

(i) Land documents in the name of Implementing Agency is required. (ii) Copy of approved Layout plan. (iii)Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (iv) Certificate from State Government for compliance of GFRJCVC guidelines. (v) TANSIDCO, Chennai should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built in a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Tamil Nadu/ TANSIDCO. (vi)Cost of land filing & leveling should be funded by State share. (vii) Revalidation of the SIDBI Appraisal Report by SIDBI. (viii) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided.

Page 12 of 17 (ix)Constitution of State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the Projects. (x) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government.

53.3.31 (S) Setting of up of New Industrial Estate at Perundurai, Erode District, Tamil Nadu.

(i) Commitment letter from State Government / IA to meet the escalation cost, if any, over and above the approved project cost. (ii) T ANSIDCO, Chennai should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete in place of Bituminous and proper drainages built III a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Tamil Nadu/ TANSIDCO. (iii) Cost of land filing & leveling should be funded by State share. (iv) Revalidation of the SIDBI Appraisal Report by SIDB!. (v) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided. (vi) Constitution of State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the Projects. (vii) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government. 53.3.32 (S) Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Kurukalpatti, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu. The Steering Committee accorded final approval with following means of finance, subject to submission of following documents prior to issuance of final approval letter. (Rs. in lakh) S.No. Particulars Approved Cost (i) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of India 343.20* (ii) Grant-in-aid from Govt. of Tamil Nadu 306.80 Total 650.00 *SIDBI recommended GoI grant of Rs. 343.20 lakh is 60% of total eligible project cost of Rs.S72.00 lakh.

Page 13 of 17 (i) T ANSIDCO, Chennai should consider laying of roads with Cement Concrete III place of Bituminous and proper drainages built III a professional manner to serve the purpose for relatively longer period of time. The additional cost on this account shall be borne by the Government of Tamil NaduJ TANSIDCO. (ii) Cost of land filing & leveling should be funded by State share. (iii) Revalidation of the SIDBI Appraisal Report by SIDBI. (iv) Undertaking from Implementing Agency regarding basis of estimates of component costs as per format provided. (v) Constitution of State Level Committee to coordinate and monitor the progress of implementation of the Projects. (vi) Tangible outcomes of the project in prescribed format from the State Government.

Agenda Item No. Ratification of Decisions 53.4

Steering Committee also ratified following time extension:

Agenda Item Proposal Project Validity No. Extended upto

53.4.1 Up gradation of infrastructure facilities at Amingaon 31.12.20 Export Promotion Industrial Park (EPIP) III Karnrup (Metro) District, Assam. 53.4.2 Setting up of New Industrial Estate at Pathsala, District 31.03.20 Barpeta, Assam. 53.4.3 Setting up of CFC in Furniture Cluster, Thrissur, Kerala. 31.12.20 53.4.4 Setting up of CFC in Plywood Cluster, ldukki, Ernakularn, 10.10.21 Kerala 53.4.5 Setting up of CFC in Gota Zari Lace Cluster, Ajrner, Rajasthan 31.03.2 I

Agenda Item No. Any Other proposals 53.5 53.5.1 Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Phase-IV, Ludhiana, Punjab. The Steering Committee accorded approval for Re-allocation of funds, subject to submission of comments from SIDBI on earlier appraised Project. 53.5.2 Re-allocation of funds in respect of up-gradation of Industrial Infrastructure in Focal Point, Jalandhar, Punjab. The Steering Committee accorded approval for Re-allocation of funds, subject to submission of comments from SIDBI on earlier appraised Project 53.5.3 Setting up of Integrated Infrastructure Development (IID) Centre at Raikot, Ludhiana, Punjab.

The Steering Committee accorded approval for Reverting the decision of 40tn SCM for refund of GoI grant of Rs. 100.00 lakh from PSIEC and directed to the State Government to complete the project on or before 31.12.20. The balance grant would be released on reimbursement basis, subject to

Page 14 of17 .. submission of Joint Verification Report and other requisite documents vetted/verified by MSME-DI, Ludhiana. The State Government will ensure that the requisite documents are submitted well in time, so that GoI Grant is released during current financial year (2020-21). 53.6 Extension of Time Project Validity Extended upto

53.6.1 (S) Setting up of CFC in Global Puffed Rice Cluster, 30.04.21 Holalkere Road, Chitradurga, Karnataka.

While concluding the meeting, the committee was of the view that State Governments shall give more priority to Flatted Factory Complexes as compared to Setting up of New Industrial Estates / Upgradation of Industrial Estates.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair and participants.

*********

Page 15 of 17 Annexure-I List of participants in the 53rd Steering Committee Meeting of MSE-CDP on 14.07.2020 at New Delhi.

S.No. Name & Designation Office S I Shri I Ms 1. A.K. Sharma, Secretary, MSME In Chair 2. Devendra Kumar Singh, AS&DC(MSME) 010 DC (MSME) 3. Sudhir Garg, Joint Secretary M/o MSME 4. Piyush Srivastava, Additional Development 010 DC (MSME) Commissioner 5. R.K. Rai, Secretary, BEE M/o Power 6. Manoj Kumar Saraswat, Director 010 DC(MSME) 7. U.C. Shukla, Director 010 DC(MSME) 8. D. K. Katara, Director 010 DC(MSME) 9. Pratiyush Mishra SIDBI, New Delhi. 10. Dr. K. Ellangovan, Principal Secretary Department of Industries & Commerce, Government of Kerala. 11. Jayesh Ranjan, Principal Secretary Department of Industries & Commerce, Govt.ofTelangana. 12. Dr. K. Gopal, Principal Secretary Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Department, Government of Tamil Nadu. 13. Premkumar V.R. Director of Industries & Commerce, Government of Kerala. 14. Archana Singh, Commissioner Industries Department of Industries & Commerce, Govt. of Rasjasthan. 15. Solmon Raju, Joint Director Commissioner of Industries, Govt. of Telangana. 16. Amulya Ratna Panda, Dy. Director Director of Industries, Govt. of Odisha. 17. Biranchi Narayan Sahoo, Industrial Supervisor Director of Industries, Government of Odisha 18. Ranjeet Kumar, Commissioner Industries Commissioner of Industries, Government of Gujarat. 19. A. P. Dharmadhikari, Joint Director Office of Development Commissioner, Govt. of Maharashtra. 20. M. Palanivel, Director (l/c) MSME-DI, Thrissur 21. G. Velladurai, Dy. Director (I/c) ICDO MSME-DI, Thrissur 22. Milind Barapatre, Director (l/c) MSME-Dl, Bangalore 23. R. Gopinath Rao, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Hubli 24. Akadas, Director MSME-DI, Bangalore 25. D. Chandra Sekha, AlA MSME-DI, Hyderabad. 26. Naveen Kumar, Investigator MSME-DI, Hyderabad. 27. R.K. Parmar, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Ludhiana 28. Deepak Chechi, Assistant Director I CDO MSME-DI, Ludhiana 29. V.K. Sharma, Director MSME-DI, Jaipur 30. Ajay SharmalCDO MSME-DI, Jaipur 31. S.K. Sahoo, Director(I1c) MSME-DI, Cuttack. 32. Damodara Behera, Assistant Director MSME-DI, Cuttack

~ Page 16 of17 S.No. Name & Designation Office S I Shri I Ms 33. Suresh Babu Ji, Director (l/C) MSME-DI, Chennai. 34. Dharmsilvam, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Chennai. 35. Chandra Prabhu, Assistant Director MSME-DI, Chennai. 36. K.H.Shah, Director (l/c) MSME-DI,AJunedabad 37. P.B.Parmar, Dy. Director MSME-DI, Ahmedabad 38. P.M. Parlewar, Director MSME-DI, Nagpur. 39. B. Mahesh, Managing Director KCTU, Bangalore 40. H.S. Jaykumar Joint Director Technical Cell, C&I secretariat, Govt. of Kamataka. 41. E.V. Narasirnha Reddy, VC&MD Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) 42. V. Madhusudhan, CEO Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (TSIIC) 43. Sumeet Jarangall Managing Director Punjab Small Industries & Export Corporation Ltd., Chandigarh. 44. R.S. Bains, Chief Engineer PSIEC 45. Ashutosh Pednekar, Managing Director RIICO 46. Rajendra Singh, General Manager RIICO 47. Sanjay Paul, CEO EDII, Ahmedabad. 48. Mayur Gupta, CEO Balasore Rice Mill Cluster. 49. Dheer Singh, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME) 50. P.V. Suresh Babu, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME) 51. Sanjay Nigam, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME) 52. Charanjeet Singh, Assistant Director 0/0 DC(MSME)

********

Page 17 of 17