Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakult¨at f¨ur Chemie und Pharmazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨at M¨unchen
From Molecular Building Blocks to Condensed Carbon Nitride Networks: Structure and Reactivity
Bettina Valeska Lotsch
aus
Frankenthal / Pfalz
2006 Erkl¨arung
Diese Dissertation wurde im Sinne von § 13 Abs. 3 bzw. 4 der Promotionsordnung vom 29. Januar 1998 von Herrn Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schnick betreut.
Ehrenw¨ortliche Versicherung
Diese Dissertation wurde selbstst¨andig, ohne unerlaubte Hilfe erarbeitet.
M¨unchen, den 20. 11. 2006
Bettina Valeska Lotsch
Dissertation eingereicht am 20. 11. 2006
1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schnick
2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. J¨urgen Senker
M¨undliche Pr¨ufung am 19. 12. 2006 To my parents and sister
Acknowledgements
First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. W. Schnick for giving me the op- portunity to work in his group, for the freedom of research paired with continuous advertence and support, and for his stimulating enthusiasm. Without his professional guidance and en- couragement, this thesis would not have become what it is.
I am indebted to Prof. J. Senker for introducing me into the “brave new world” of solid-state NMR, for his encouragement to never stop digging deeper, for his conviction that the time issue comes only second, and for his seemingly never ending repertoir of questions, answers, ideas and patience, as well as for being co-referee of this thesis.
I am thankful to Prof. T. Bein, Prof. D. Johrendt, Prof. K. Karaghiosoff and Prof. T. M. Klap¨otke for their being available as examiners in my viva-voce.
Special thanks go to Dr. Markus D¨oblinger, as well as Lena Seyfarth and Jan Sehnert for a fruitful collaboration and stimulating insights into electron diffraction, solid-state NMR, and the world of theory, respectively.
For carrying out innumerous measurements, as well as for the “postprocessing” involved, I would like to thank Sandra Albert, Dr. Sascha Correll, Dr. Markus D¨oblinger, Dagmar Ewald, Dr. Gerd Fischer, Helmut Hartl, Dr. Alexandra Lieb, Prof. Dr. Konstantin Karaghiosoff, Juliane Kechele, Thomas Miller, Christian Minke, Peter Mayer, Dr. Peter Mayer, Dr. Oliver Oeckler, Andreas Sattler and Wolfgang W¨unschheim.
In detail, I would like to thank
• Dr. Oliver Oeckler for his invaluable advice (both in real and in reciprocal space) and for his particular “challenging” view on things in general,
• Dr. J¨orn Schmedt auf der G¨unne and Christian Minke for their assistance and co- operation in all NMR-related matters,
• Dr. Barbara J¨urgens for opening up the intriguing playground of C/N chemistry and shifting the focus to the most interesting problems,
• Andreas Sattler and Theresa Soltner for their assistance, invaluable discussions and exchange of views on C/N matters and beyond, • my bachelor and research students Lucia Romana Lorenz and Daniel Benker for their participation and support,
• Carolin Buhtz for her creative contributions to the electron diffraction investigations and her imperturbable capability to listen and de-dramatize things,
• Dr. Alexandra Lieb for keeping company in our “night-lab”, for her unfailing nutritional backup, and for her inspiringly different world outlook – I learned a lot ...
• Dr. Ulrich Baisch and Dr. Sascha Correll for their outstanding helpfulness and guidance,
• Dr. Alexandra Lieb, Juliane Kechele, Robert Kraut, Dr. Abanti Nag, Rebecca R¨omer and Wolfgang W¨unschheim for their collegiality and for creating a pleasant working- and “biosphere” in laboratory D 2.107,
• Wolfgang W¨unschheim for technical support whenever hardware or software of all kinds quit the service,
• Richard Betz, Sebastian Braun, Dr. Markus D¨oblinger, Michael G¨obel and Dr. Oliver Oeckler for proof-reading this thesis and for racking their brains for me ...
For providing a particularly convenient working atmosphere throughout the last years and for all sorts of technical, scientific and “personal” support, I woud like to thank my – present and past – colleagues Dr. Ulrich Baisch, Constantin Beyer, Sabine Beyer, Daniel Bichler, Cordula Braun, Sascha Correll, Holger Emme, Cora Hecht, Elsbeth Hermanns, Gunther Heymann, Dr. Henning H¨oppe, PD Dr. Hubert Huppertz, Stefanie Jakob, Petra Jakubcova, Friedrich Ka- rau, Juliane Kechele, Johanna Knyrim, Robert Kraut, Dr. Alexandra Lieb, Catrin L¨ohnert, Thomas Miller, Christian Minke, Helen M¨uller, Dr. Abanti Nag, Dr. Oliver Oeckler, Sandro Pagano, Dr. Regina Pocha, Florian Pucher, Stefan Rannabauer, Christoph R¨ohlich, Rebecca R¨omer, Andreas Sattler, Dr. J¨orn Schmedt auf der G¨unne, Christian Schmolke, Stefan Sedl- maier, Jan Sehnert, Lena Seyfarth, Theresa Soltner, Florian Stadler, Dr. Johannes Weber, Wolfgang W¨unschheim and Martin Zeuner. Above all, I am indebted to my parents, my sister and Sebastian, who continuously encouraged and supported me with maximum forbearance and patience. For all what they have done and sacrificed, suffice it to say:
Gratitude is one of the least articulate of the emotions, especially when it is deep. Felix Frankfurter
Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still. Chinese Proverb Contents
1 Introduction 15
2 Experimental Methods 22 2.1PreparativeMethods...... 22 2.1.1 VacuumandInertGasLine...... 22 2.1.2 Furnaces...... 22 2.1.3 GloveBox...... 23 2.1.4 OperatingTechniques...... 23 2.2AnalyticalMethods...... 24 2.2.1 DiffractionTechniques...... 24 2.2.2 SpectroscopicMethods...... 30 2.2.3 ElementalAnalysis...... 36 2.2.4 MassSpectrometry...... 37 2.2.5 ThermalAnalysis...... 37
3 Theoretical Basis and Models 38 3.1DynamicalProcesses...... 38 3.2NeutronScattering...... 41 3.2.1 BasicPrinciples...... 41 3.2.2 Diffraction...... 43 3.2.3 QuasielasticNeutronScattering(QENS)...... 44 3.2.4 MotionalModels...... 46 3.2.5 EISF...... 47 3.3MagneticResonance...... 48 3.3.1 BasicPrinciples...... 48 3.3.2 InteractionHamiltoniansandOperatorFormalism...... 50 3.3.3 High-ResolutionNMR:GeneralAspectsandTechniques...... 63
10 CONTENTS CONTENTS
4 Dynamics and Reactivity 69 4.1 Ammonium Dicyanamide ...... 71 4.1.1 Introduction...... 71 4.1.2 Solid-StateNMR...... 73 4.1.3 NeutronScattering...... 90 4.2 Ammonium Cyanoureate ...... 105 4.2.1 Introduction...... 105 4.2.2 CrystalStructure...... 105 4.2.3 ThermalReactivity...... 110 4.2.4 Cyanoguanylurea...... 121
5CNx Precursors 128 5.1Dicyanamides...... 130 5.2GuanidiniumDicyanamide...... 135 5.2.1 Introduction...... 135 5.2.2 CrystalStructures...... 135 5.2.3 VibrationalSpectroscopy...... 141 5.2.4 ThermalBehavior...... 143 5.3MelaminiumDicyanamide...... 148 5.3.1 Introduction...... 148 5.3.2 CrystalStructure...... 148 5.3.3 ThermalBehavior...... 151 5.3.4 Temperature-DependentFTIRSpectroscopy...... 153 5.3.5 Discussion...... 155 5.4GuanylureaDicyanamide...... 157 5.4.1 Introduction...... 157 5.4.2 CrystalStructure...... 157 5.4.3 SpectroscopicCharacterization...... 159 5.4.4 ThermalBehavior...... 160 5.5Tricyanomelaminates...... 167 5.6Non-MetalTricyanomelaminates...... 170 5.6.1 CrystalStructuresandSpectroscopicCharacterization...... 170 5.6.2 ThermalBehavior...... 185 5.6.3 DSC and In Situ X-RayDiffraction...... 186 5.6.4 IRSpectroscopy...... 188 5.6.5 Solid-StateNMR...... 191
11 CONTENTS CONTENTS
5.6.6 Discussion...... 192 5.7PreliminaryConclusion...... 193
6Melam 196 6.1Introduction...... 197 6.2ThermalBehaviorofMelamine...... 200 6.3 Adduct Phases ...... 203 6.3.1 MassSpectrometry...... 203 6.3.2 ElementalAnalysis...... 204 6.3.3 IRSpectroscopy...... 205 6.3.4 NMRSpectroscopy...... 206 6.3.5 ThermalAnalysis...... 212 6.4Melam...... 213 6.4.1 IRSpectroscopyI:Formation...... 215 6.4.2 AnalyticalData...... 216 6.4.3 CrystalStructure...... 216 6.4.4 IRSpectroscopyII:Structure...... 218 6.4.5 Solid-StateNMRSpectroscopy...... 218 6.4.6 ThermalBehavior...... 221 6.4.7 UV/VisSpectroscopy...... 222 6.4.8 Discussion...... 224 6.5MelamDerivatives...... 226 6.5.1 MelamSolvates...... 227 6.5.2 MelamiumSalts...... 234 6.5.3 Metal-Melam Complexes ...... 246 6.6 Ammeline Salts ...... 263 6.6.1 Introduction...... 263 6.6.2 CrystalStructures...... 264 6.6.3 IRSpectroscopy...... 270 6.6.4 Discussion...... 273 6.7MelaminiumDinitrate...... 274 6.8PreliminaryConclusion...... 278
7Melon 280 7.1Introduction...... 281 7.2“MelemOligomer”...... 285
12 CONTENTS CONTENTS
7.3SynthesisandComposition...... 287 7.4Reactivity...... 289 7.5Morphology...... 291 7.6VibrationalSpectroscopy...... 292 7.7X-rayPowderDiffraction...... 294 7.8Solid-StateNMRSpectroscopy...... 295 7.8.1 CP-andCPPI-MASExperiments...... 295 7.9ElectronDiffraction...... 303 7.9.1 PhenomenologicalDescripton...... 303 7.9.2 StructureElucidation...... 306 7.9.3 StructureDescription...... 312 7.10Melon:TheoreticalCalculations...... 314 7.10.1StructuralModels...... 314 7.10.2 Ab Initio NMRCalculations...... 319 7.113DApproaches...... 320 7.12SidePhases...... 326 7.13ModelsforGraphiticCarbonNitride...... 329 7.13.1FullyCondensedStructureModels...... 329 7.13.2“Defect”StructureModels...... 331 7.13.3“Mixed”StructureModels...... 333 7.14PreliminaryConclusion...... 334
8 Discussion and Outlook 337
9 Summary 345
10 Appendix 355 10.1Syntheses...... 355
10.1.1 Ammonium Dicyanamide NH4[N(CN)2] ...... 355
10.1.2 ND4[N(CN)2]...... 355
10.1.3 Ammonium Cyanoureate NH4[H2NC(=O)NCN]...... 356
10.1.4 Cyanoguanylurea H2NC(=O)NHC(NH2)NCN...... 356
10.1.5 Guanidinium Dicyanamide [C(NH2)3][N(CN)2] ...... 356
10.1.6 Melaminium Dicyanamide [C3N3H(NH2)3][N(CN)2] · H2O...... 357
10.1.7 Guanylurea Dicyanamide [(H2N)C(=O)NHC(NH2)2][N(CN)2]...... 358 10.1.8Non-MetalTricyanomelaminates...... 358 15 15 10.1.9 N-Melamine C3 N6H6 ...... 360
13 CONTENTS CONTENTS
10.1.10 Ammeline Salts ...... 360 10.2Chemicals...... 361 10.3CrystalStructures...... 362 10.3.1 2,4-Diamino-1,3,5-Triazine ...... 362 10.3.2GuanylureaSulfate...... 364 10.4Melon:ElectronDiffraction...... 366 10.5Solid-StateNMRSpectroscopy...... 367 10.5.1LineShapeSimulations...... 367 10.5.2ProgramCode...... 368
Abbreviations 375
Bibliography 378
List of Publications and CSD / CCSD Deposition Numbers 409
Curriculum Vitae 414
14 Chapter 1
Introduction
The ongoing quest for the hypothetical binary carbon nitride C3N4 stands for a prospering area of research in modern solid-state and materials chemistry, that has taken root at the frontiers of basic and applied research in the past 15 years. Nitridic materials constitute an exceptionally versatile group of compounds in terms of chemical bonding, ranging from salt-like over metallic to covalent, the latter one comprising both molecular representatives
(S4N4) and extended solids such as (BN)x or P3N5 [1–8]. Non-metal nitrides such as silicon nitride Si3N4, c-BN, or GaN have long been known for their exceptional physical and chemical properties, among which low density, high melting points, hardness, resistance and semicon- ducting properties are the most prominent ones [2, 5, 6]. In terms of chemical stability these high-performance ceramic materials by far outperform oxidic materials, the latter however still dominating the field of functional ceramics, represented for instance by ferroelectrics, zeolites, zirconia, or high-temperature superconductors. However, the extension of nitride chemistry to mixed nitrides such as oxonitrides, nitridosili- cates, nitridophosphates or oxonitridophosphates has produced a plethora of novel materials with interesting structures [9–20] and tunable properties, now being at the forefront of mate- rials science: Ternary nitrides based on rare earth metal ions in a nitridosilicate framework have pioneered the rapidly growing field of inorganic LEDs [21–26], and multinary phases such as SiONs and SiAlONs represent tailor-made ceramics with outstanding material prop- erties [21,27–30]. Likewise, the formal introduction of boron and carbon into a silicon nitride network has recently openened up a novel class of amorphous Si–B–(C–)N high-performance polymers with unprecedented thermal stability [31–33]. The screening for novel ultrahard materials among combinations of low-weight main group el- ements, featuring covalent bonding and highly cross-linked structures, has become manifest in the compounds c-BC2N [34–36] or γ-Si3N4, a novel, high-pressure silicon nitride modification
15 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION adopting a Spinel-type structure [5, 37–40]. In terms of hardness, a most promising candidate is the hypothetical binary carbon(IV)nitride alternatingly made up from carbon and nitrogen, whose existence is still a matter at issue. For the dense, sp3-hybridized modifications a bulk modulus larger than that of diamond is conjectured following the empirical principles by Liu and Cohen [41] according to which the bulk modulus is inversely proportional to both ionicity and interatomic distances. For a re- alistic estimation of the hardness of a material, however, the shear modulus has also to be taken into account, thus suggesting an overall similar, but slightly lower hardness for carbon nitride as compared to diamond [42]. Nevertheless, a promising new member of the familiy of ultrahard materials is to be expected, whose potential properties span a wide range of interesting features, such as high thermal con- ductivityandlargebandgaps(3–4eV),orauxeticbehaviorofcertain CNx phases [42–45]. According to theoretical calculations, at least four metastable highly condensed, crystalline modifications may exist: α-C3N4 (hexagonal), β-C3N4 (β-Si3N4-type), pseudocubic C3N4 (de- fect ZnS-type), cubic C3N4 (Willemit-II-type), whose stabilities are similar, yet less than that 2 of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)withsp-hybridized carbon [41–55]. Apart from various phases with higher or
N N N N lower nitrogen content [56–58], carbodiimide- N N N N N N
N N N N N N N N N N N bridged structures [59, 60], and CNx-
N N N N N N N N N N N N heterofullerenes and -nanotubes [61–65], N NNNN NNNN N N hypothetical low density 3D-networks made
Figure 1.1: Hexagonal (left) and orthorhombic mod- up from triazine building blocks with SrSi2- ification (right) of g-C3N4, both based on nitrogen or ThSi2- type topologies have recently been bridged 1,3,5-triazine rings as elementary building presented and ranked within the stability blocks. range of the g-C3N4 phases [66]. Innumerable attempts using a broad repertoire of physicochemical methods have been undertaken to find viable synthetic pathways to carbon nitride [42–44]: Apart from chemical techniques at ambient conditions such as pyrolyses, shock-wave techniques, CVD- (HFCVD, PECVD) and PVD-processes (ion beam deposition), laser techniques [67], and sputtering processes have been utilized. The as-obtained, predominantly amorphous CNx thin films exhibit interesting optical, electronic, or tribological properties according to their nitrogen content, and have already found applications as reactive films or coatings, as thin films in solar cells [68,69], in sensors, MEMs (micro-electromechanical devices) [70], or transistors [71].
A rather “chemical” approach to 3D C3N4 immediately follows from direct analogy to the system graphite-diamond: According to DFT-calculations, the conversion of graphitic carbon
16 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
3 nitride into sp -C3N4 should be feasible with modern high-pressure techniques at pressures ≤ 75 GPa [51, 59, 72]. Commonly invoked structure models for graphitic carbon nitride, which can formally be de- rived from graphite-type (CN)x layers by introducing ordered carbon vacancies, consistently derive from triazine units that are linked up by essentially planar trigonal nitrogen atoms, building up an infinite two-dimensional array with hexagonal or orthorhombic symmetry (Fig. 1.1) [42–44, 48, 50–53, 55, 73, 74]. In addition, carbodiimide-bridged structures were discussed [59].
The triazine ring system (C3N3) is found in various heterocycles as a structural building block, as is the case for the important CNx precursor 2,4,6-triamino-s-triazine (melamine, C3N3(NH2)3)(1)) (Fig. 1.2). Despite persistent research efforts, the existence and molec- ular structure of the condensation products of melamine, namely the compounds melam
[(C3N3)(NH2)2]2NH (3), melem C6N7(NH2)3 (2), and melon [C6N7(NH)(NH2)]n (4), has long been subject to debate. According to early investigations by Paul-
NH2 NH 2 NH2 ing and Sturdivant [75], the latter com- N N N N N N pounds exhibit the sym-heptazine nucleus N N N H2N N NH2 N N N (1) NH H2N NN 2 HN NNNH (tri-s-triazin, C6N7H3) as characteristic (2) N N N N NH2 NH2 building block, the terminology confirming N N N N N N N N N N a close analogy to the cyanuric building mo-
H N N N N NH 2 2 H2N NN N NNNH2 H H (3)(4) tive found in triazines (Fig. 1.2). Neither for the molecular nor for the crystal Figure 1.2: Known and assumed structures of poten- structure of melam experimental evidence is tial precursor compounds for C3N4.(1) Melamine, (2) melem, (3) melam, (4) possible structure of “melon”. available. Spectroscopic data however were interpreted on the basis of two triazine rings bridged by an NH-unit [76–79]. The question as for the role of melam in the condensation process from melamine to g-C3N4 has not been resolved as yet. The same holds true for melon, for which either an oligomeric structure (trimer of melem) or a 1D polymeric structure based on heptazine units is discussed (Fig. 1.2) [76, 80, 81]. With the structural characterization of melem (2,5,8-triamino-heptazine) the ultimate proof of the existence of a key intermediate in the condensation cascade of melamine to g-C3N4 was accomplished [82], which as a consequence significantly extended the pool of molecular motifs for g-C3N4 [83, 84]: DFT calculations carried out by Kroke et al. [85] suggest the existence of a graphitic C3N4 phase based on heptazine units (Fig. 1.3), which is expected to be by 30 kJ mol−1 more stable than the triazine-based analogue (Fig. 1.1).
17 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Viable synthetic routes to graphitic carbon nitride have recently been subject to vivid re- search efforts [42–44]. The primarily employed “precursor-route” is based on the pyrolysis of molecular compounds or thermally induced two-component reactions between suitably func- tionalized precursors [1, 86]. Molecular compounds exhibiting an adequate scheme of atom connections (“pre-organization”) as well as the desired over-all stoichiometry, have proven to be particularly suitable precursors [87, 88]. According to these principles, the high-
performance ceramics Si3B3N7 and SiBN3C N N N N have been obtained from thermal decompo- N N N N N N sition of the single-source precursor TADB N NNN NNN (trichlorosilylaminodichloroborane) and
N N N N N N methylamine [31, 32]. Likewise, Cl3SiNPCl3
N N N N N N N N N with the built-in structural element of two
NNN NN N NN vertex sharing PN4- and SiN4-tetrahedra bridged by a nitrogen atom has been proven Figure 1.3: Structural model for g-C3N4 based on to be a particularly useful precursor for the heptazine builiding blocks. synthesis of SiPN3 [89]. Analogously, the binary non-metal nitride P3N5 was successfully obtained by the pyrolysis of the single-source precursor tetraaminophosphonium iodide [P(NH2)4]I [14–16]. The synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride has been attempted using a wide range of different precusors [83, 84, 90, 91]. Pivotal starting materials used most frequently can almost exclu- sively be derived from the triazine, yet rarely from the heptazine core, thereby conforming to the pre-organization principle and combining the requirements of high nitrogen and low hydrogen contents. Irrespective of the synthesis conditions and the partly significant hydrogen contamination, the structures of the obtained products are commonly interpreted without conclusive argumentation on the basis of threefold N-bridged triazine systems. In doing so, solely the possible formation of spherically corrugated layers or CNx nanotubes is being considered. Owing to the very resistant N–H or C–H bonds and the inclusion of further heteroatoms such as oxygen into the 2D-network depending on the choice of precursor, and the overall difficulties in preparing pure g-C3N4 phases with exact stoichiometry, ultimate proof of 3 the existence of either pure g-C3N4,orsp-C3N4 has not been given as yet. Similarly, no conclusive experimental evidence has been put forward for either of the structural models proposed for g-C3N4, which eludes conventional structural characterization due to its largely polymeric and amorphous character. Apart from solid-state NMR studies on the structure
18 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION of paracyanogene [92] and a small number of 13C-CP MAS experiments using poorly crystalline carbon nitride samples [93, 94], no experimental studies exist to date which are comprehensively dealing with this issue. The lack of structural information can in principle be tackled qualitatively by gaining detailed insight into the actual species occuring during the course of the reaction and constituting the final products. Therefore, knowledge about possible intermediates and preferred reaction pathways is not only a prerequisite for a tailored synthetic approach to graphitic carbon nitride (“crystal engineering”), but can deliver vital information on the structure of the reaction products. Understanding the processes on a molecular level can thus be indispensable to rule out certain structural models in favour of others, whose formation pathways agree well with all stages of the reaction history. A prominent example for a highly relevant inconsistency in carbon nitride chemistry can be ascribed to the lack of insight into processes occurring on a molecular level: The popular concept of thermally linking triazine units via trigonal planar nitrogen atoms has been sustained, although the condensation of melamine to melem has been proven to proceed as an intermediate stage prior to the formation of g-C3N4 [82]. Disregarding this fact has long hampered the heptazine-hypothesis to enter the focus of the scientific community. “Corpora non agunt, nisi fluida seu dissoluta”.1 A thorough understanding of molecular solid-state reactions has traditionally been suffering from the nescience of their feasibility and the predominance of mechanistic investigations in solution. Only a limited number of comprehensive studies on molecular solid-state reactions exists in the literature [95]. As apart from classical photoreactions most reactions are induced thermally, the solid compound must exhibit a sufficiently high melting point, which is rarely met in molecular crystals, leading to melting prior to the reaction onset. In addition, both the technical and the methodological realization of in situ monitoring of solid-phase reactions is by far more demanding as compared to the situation in solution, since comparable information is accessible in a rather indirect way and often complicated by intermolecular interactions and the impact of the crystal field, both of which being difficult to treat in a straightforward way. Intriguing features of molecular solid-state reactions are their simple and resource-saving im- plementation without the necessity of using a solvent, thus providing an easy work-up, as well as increased selectivity and efficiency with diminished formation of unwanted side-products in many cases. Accordingly, asymmetric transformations with high enantioselectivity could be achieved by making use of the chiral environment of the molecules in the crystal [95, 96]. At the same time, however, reaction control is greatly reduced when considering the
1“Compounds that are not fluid or dissolved do not react”, by Aristotle
19 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION special case of thermal solid-state reactions using one-component homogeneous solids, thus requiring maximum precision in exercising thermal control. Alternatively, the strategy of crystal-engineering can be pursued by creating one- or two-component solids by intramolec- ular substitution, mixed-crystal formation, or host-guest complexation to selectively tailor reactivity on a molecular level. According to the topochemical principle introduced by Kohlsch¨utter and Hertel, and reformulated by Schmidt [97–100], reactions in the solid state occurring with a minimum of atomic or molecular movement are preferred. As a result, static lattice constraints restrict the products of a topochemical reaction to those pre-organized in the parent crystal [101–107]. This principle, however, has recently been challenged by the observation of long-range anisotropic molecular movements in typical “topochemical” photoreactions by the application of atomic force microscopy to irradiated single crystal surfaces [108–110]. Thus, differentiating seems advisable between topochemical reactions and the special case of topotactic reactions, the latter running in a single-crystal-to-single-crystal fashion without crystal disintegration and without significant geometric changes requiring far-reaching molecular movements [108, 111, 112]. According to Lotgering [113] topotactic reactions include “all chemical solid-state reactions that lead to a material with crystal orientations correlated with the crystal orientation of the reagent”. Prominent examples of topochemical reactions are photoreactions such as [2+2] photodimer- izations of cinnamic acid derivatives [99, 100, 114, 115] and coumarins [96, 116, 117], or the polymerization of diacetylenes [118] whose reactivity is largely governed by the packing of the reactants rather than by their intrinsic molecular reactivity. Solid-state reactions proceeding in a non-topochemical fashion are those taking place at locally increased defect concentrations, surfaces or disordered domains, the latter imper- fections being essential for the reactions to occur. Along theses lines, amorphous solids or inclusion compounds may provide a reaction environment without 3D interlocking, thus allowing for easy phase rebuilding and transformation through unrestricted molecular migration [108, 117, 119, 120]. The significance of thermal solid-state reactions, particularly of the latter kind, has long been disregarded in carbon nitride chemistry (cf. above). The synthetic concept of precursor chemistry has, however, continuously shaped the awareness of the reactivity principle, which is indispensable for the directed synthesis of highly condensed networks. An appealingly simple synthetic route to extended 2D carbon nitride networks is based on the thermal treat- ment of suitable ternary carbon nitrides such as cyanamides [82], dicyanamides [121–124], or tricyanomelaminates [125–127], thiocyanates [83] or melamine derivatives [82–84, 128],
20 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION utilizing “self-condensation” reactions initiated by unsaturated or nucleophilic moieties without the necessity of co-reactants or specifically functionalized reaction sites. However, it must be emphasized that the classification of a reaction as “solid-state reaction” is critical in many respects, as essentially all reactions – apart from topotactic reactions – exhibit some form of “molecular loosening”, which can lead to microscopic melting at the reaction front invisible or undetectable by thermal analysis. Moreover, the majority of reactions in carbon nitride chemistry has simply not been classified with respect to the type of reaction that occurs. Although it is still common practice to treat such thermal condensations as “black box” reactions, the elucidation of their mechanism and dynamic processes is a prerequisite to obtain well-defined solids with tailored connectivities.
In order to comprehensively understand and utilize processes on a molecular level, three main goals have to be pursued; their implementation will be referred to in more detail at the beginning of each chapter:
1. Chemical Screening. Candidates potentially exhibiting reactivity in the solid phase have to be selected according to chemical considerations, and their performance tested.
Chapters 5, 6 and 7 are devoted to this issue and present examples of potential CNx precursors. Candidates have been selected from three major groups of compounds, namely dicyanamides, tricyanomelaminates, and condensation products of melamine.
2. Reaction Pathway. Microscopic and macroscopic processes have to be identified by a qualitative description of the reaction pathways and possible intermediates.
As an extension of the chemical screening, the thermal behavior of the above CNx pre- cursors was monitored by a combination of in situ spectroscopic and diffraction tech- niques. The thermolysis pathways and their significance with respect to the formation of extended carbon nitride solids are discussed in Chapters 5 to 7. An in-depth study of the complex thermal decomposition of ammonium cyanoureate will be presented in the second part of Chapter 4.
3. Reaction Mechanism. A full understanding of the reaction requires the quantitative description of the reaction parameters such as kinetics, thermodynamics, and the pro- cesses occurring on the submicroscopic level. This approach provides the basis of the first part of Chapter 4, in which the thermal + solid-state reactivity and NH4 dynamics of ammonium dicyanamide will be delineated as an example.
21 Chapter 2
Experimental Methods
2.1 Preparative Methods
2.1.1 Vacuum and Inert Gas Line
Thermolyses and manipulations of air-sensitive compounds were carried out under an atmo- sphere of dry argon (purity grade 4.8, Messer) to exlude humidity and oxygen throughout the reactions. The reaction vessels (Schlenk flasks, ampules) were connected to a vacuum line via ground necks and dried in vacuo using a heat gun or fan burner. Evacuation was accomplished with a rotary vane pump (RZ 8, VAP 5, suction capacity 8.6 m3 h−1, Vacuubrand) down to pressures of 0.1 Pa. Purification and drying of inert gas was carried out by successively pass- ing the latter through columns filled with blue silica gel (Merck), potassium hydroxide pellets (purum, Merck), molecular sieve (porewidth 0.3 nm, Merck), and phosphorus pentoxide on an inert carrier material (SicapentTM, Merck). To remove adherent traces of oxygen, nitrogen or hydrogen, the gas was finally passed over titanium sponge (99.5 %, Alfa) at 973 K.
2.1.2 Furnaces
Reactions at elevated temperatures (typically 320 – 940 K) were conducted in tubular furnaces with electric resistance heating, a maximum continuous operating temperature of 1273 K and programmed temperature control, allowing for heating rates ≥ 1Kmin−1. The temperature was measured in the reaction zone with a Ni/Cr-Ni thermocouple, the reliability being ± 20 K. Typically, a vertical set-up was chosen, thus leading to a separation of the reaction products within the reaction tube according to their volatility. Flow tubes were placed horizontally in the tubular furnace and connected to a vacuum line for supply of a permanent reactive or inert gas atmosphere.
22 CHAPTER 2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 2.1. PREPARATIVE METHODS
2.1.3 Glove Box
For manipulation and storage of hygroscopic or air-sensitive compounds under argon (purity grade 4.8, Messer) a glove box (MB150–Gl and UniLab, O2 < 1 ppm, H2O < 1 ppm, MBraun) was used.
2.1.4 Operating Techniques
2.1.4.1 Ion Exchange
Ion exchange reactions were conducted according to the column principle using vertically placed glass frits (lenght: 26 cm, ∅ext. 12 – 24 mm, pore size: P 1 – 2). The frits were filled with an ion exchange resin (H+-form, art. no. 4765, Merck) suspended in deionized water. In special cases (low solubility of the product, poor ion exchange capacity for certain ions), metathesis reactions were carried out by slowly combining aqueous or methanolic solutions of the reactants under heating.
2.1.4.2 Thermal Conversions and Sublimation
Thermal conversions were typically carried out under counter-pressure of the evolving gases such as ammonia. The well-ground reactant mixture was directly loaded in pre-dried am- poules, which were subsequently sealed off under argon to lenghts of approximately 12 cm. TM For temperatures below 550 K, Duran ampules (∅ext. 16 mm, wall thickness: 1.5 mm) were used, for temperatures beyond 550 K thick-walled ampules made from silica glass (∅ext. 15 mm, wall thickness: 2 mm, Vogelsberger Quarzglastechnik K. D. Kindl GmbH) were sealed with an oxyhydrogen burner. Reactions requiring pressure equalization were conducted in TM pre-dried Duran or silica glass ampules (∅ext. 16 – 24 mm, wall thickness: 1 – 1.5 mm) equipped with a paraffin bubble counter. To preclude corrosion of the glass walls by the reactants, corundum crucibles were used as insets. Condensation reactions under dynamic vacuum were carried out using a flow tube-type set-up. The flow tube (silica glass, length:
68 cm, ∅ext. 29 mm) was loaded with the starting material contained in a combustion boat (length: 80 mm, corundum, Friatec), placed horizontally in a tubular furnace, and exposed to dynamic vacuum while heating the reactant. Evolving gases were collected in a cold trap. Crude products such as 15N-enriched melamine raw material were purified by sublimation in aDuranTM flask equipped with a cold finger. The flask was evacuated (1 Pa) and heated (1 K min−1) in a tubular furnace, while the sublimate deposited at the bottom zone of the cold finger.
23 2.2. ANALYTICAL METHODS CHAPTER 2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
2.2 Analytical Methods
2.2.1 Diffraction Techniques
For a detailed disquisition on this subject, the reader is referred to standard works in the literature [129, 130], as well as to the textbook by Zou [131].
2.2.1.1 Theory
Since its advent in 1912, X-ray crystallography, i. e. structure analysis based on X-ray diffrac- tion, is still the most important technique for studying the structures of objects periodically ordered on an atomic length scale. Electron diffraction of single crystals was discovered fif- teen years later, leading thereafter to the exploitation of the wave properties of electrons by invention of the electron microscope using magnetic lenses. By combination of electron diffraction and atomic resolution electron microscopy with crystallographic image processing, a new powerful tool for structure analysis – electron crystallography – is emerging. The interaction of waves or particles – typically photons (such as X-rays), neutrons, or elec- trons – with periodically ordered objects of dimensions similar to the wavelength of the in- cident radiation, can to a first approximation be described using the concept of kinematical scattering theory. The mathematical treatment of diffraction in three dimensions is given by the Laue Equations, which are equivalent to the condition that the vectorial momentum transfer Q is equal to a reciprocal lattice vector 2πr∗
Q =2πr∗, (2.1)
− 2π − where Q = k k0 = λ (s s0). r∗: reciprocal lattice vector k0/s0: wave vector / unit vector of the incident radiation k/s: wave vector / unit vector of the scattered radiation
The correlation of the scattered intensity I(Q) with the arrangement of atoms v at position r is then given by the structure amplitude F(Q) as a function of the momentum transfer Q: F f i · T · exp{i }, (Q)= v(Q) v(Q) Qrv (2.2) v
24 CHAPTER 2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS 2.2. ANALYTICAL METHODS where f X ρ0 · exp{i }dτ v (Q)= v(r) Qr for X-rays, f N (Q)= b for neutrons, v v f E 2πme ϕ exp{i }dτ v (Q)= h2 Ω j(r) Qr for electrons, and Tv(Q) denotes the atomic temperature factor, which represents a correction for the de- flection of the atoms from their equilibrium positions due to thermal movements. f i v(Q) represents the atomic scattering factors and describes the angle-dependent atomic scat- tering amplitudes for the respective type of interaction. Owing to the finite expansion of the f X electron cloud around a nucleus, for X-rays, v (Q) has to be summed up over the static ρ0 dτ electron density v(r) of infinitesimal volume elements , taking into account a phase fac- exp{i } f E tor Qr . Similarly, for electrons v (Q) depends on the type and state of the atom, where the strength of the interaction of electrons with matter is indicated by the interaction constant, defined as
πmeλ σ 2 . = h2 (2.3)
f i | | For both X-rays and electrons, v(Q) decreases rapidly with increasing Q . Neutrons interact with the atomic nuclei, which are by a factor of 105 smaller than the exten- sion of the entire atom and can therefore be approximated as point scatterers. Therefore, the integral over the infinitesimal volume elements simplifies to a constant factor, which is given by the scattering length bv. Thus, the atomic form factor is isotropic and does not exhibit an angle-dependent decrease with increasing momentum transfer. For X-rays and neutrons, the scattered intensities are proportional to the square of the struc- ture amplitude, taking into account several correction terms during data reduction:
2 Ihkl ∝| Fhkl | , (2.4) where
Ihkl: intensity of reflection (hkl)
Fhkl: structure amplitude.
By Fourier transformation of F(Q), the scattering density functions ρ(r)orϕ(r)canbe accessed, which translate the observed structure amplitudes into electron, nuclear, or potential
25 2.2. ANALYTICAL METHODS CHAPTER 2. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS distributions, respectively. ρX,N (r)= F (Q) exp−iQrd3Q, (2.5)