DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution Onitoring Rogramme 2006-08

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution Onitoring Rogramme 2006-08 EVOLUTION ONITORING ROGRAMME 2006-08 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report September 2008 Charlie Jeffery (ed.) Institute of Governance, University of Edinburgh www.institute-of-governance.org ISSN 1751-3855 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell at The Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Prof Charlie Jeffery & Dr Nicola McEwen Institute of Governance, University of Edinburgh Wales: Prof Richard Wyn Jones & Prof Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, Aberystwyth University Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Prof Martin Burch, Prof Alan Harding & Dr James Rees IPEG, University of Manchester The Centre: Prof Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme. All devolution monitoring reports are published at: www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution- unit/research/devolution. Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report September 2008 Charlie Jeffery (ed.) Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report September 2008 Introduction 4 1. The Scottish Government 6 1.1 The New Scottish Ministerial Code ..................................................................6 1.2 Quangos, Relocation and Regulation...............................................................9 1.3 The Lord Advocate ........................................................................................10 1.4 C. Difficile ......................................................................................................11 1.5 Civil service: terms, conditions and roles .......................................................11 1.6 Freedom of Information and Fiscal Fines .......................................................12 1.7 Peripatetic Cabinet ........................................................................................13 2. The Scottish Parliament 14 2.1 Wendy Alexander’s Standards.......................................................................14 2.2 Creative Scotland Bill.....................................................................................15 2.3 Members’ Expenses ......................................................................................16 2.4 Scottish Parliament Committees ....................................................................17 2.5 Committee Reports and Inquiries (7 May – 5 September 2008).....................19 2.6 Parliamentary Bills (7 May 2008 – 5 September 2008) ..................................21 2.7 Sewel (Legislative Consent) Motions passed (7 May 2008 – 5 September 2008) 23 3. The Media 24 3.1 Resignation of Wendy Alexander...................................................................24 3.2 Nicol Stephen’s Resignation ..........................................................................26 3.3 Glasgow East By-Election..............................................................................28 3.4 Labour Leadership Contest............................................................................32 3.5 SNP Flagship Policies Under Fire..................................................................35 3.6 Glenrothes By-Election ..................................................................................38 3.7 BBC, Gaelic Channel, Scottish Digital Channel..............................................39 4. Public Attitudes 42 4.1 Attitudes towards devolution ..........................................................................42 4.1.1 Constitutional Preferences .....................................................................42 Figure 4.1: TNS System Three – Constitutional Preferences ...............................42 Figure 4.2: YouGov – Constitutional Preferences.................................................43 4.1.2 Scottish Social Attitudes Core Report.....................................................44 Figure 4.3: Scottish Social Attitudes.....................................................................45 4.2 National Identity.............................................................................................48 4.3 Other Issues ..................................................................................................48 4.3.1 Broadcasting..........................................................................................48 Figure 4.4: Impact of the BBC in Scotland............................................................50 Figure 4.5: Impact of the media in Scotland .........................................................52 4.3.2 Happiness..............................................................................................54 4.4 Party Fortunes ...............................................................................................55 4.4.1 Holyrood Voting Intentions .....................................................................55 Figure 4.6: Scottish Parliament Voting Intentions .................................................55 4.4.2 Westminster Vote Intentions ..................................................................56 Figure 4.7: Westminster Voting Intentions............................................................56 4.4.3 Westminster by-election.........................................................................56 Figure 4.8: Glasgow East By-Election Results .....................................................58 4.4.3 Local Government By-Elections .............................................................58 Figure 4.9: Aberdeenshire, Troup By-Election Results .........................................59 1 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report September 2008 Figure 4.10: Dumfries and Galloway, Abbey By-Election Results...........................59 4.5 Attitudes towards Parties and Leaders...........................................................59 4.5.1 Parties....................................................................................................59 4.5.2 Leaders..................................................................................................59 Figure 4.11: Party Leader Popularity Poll ...............................................................60 Figure 4.12: Government responsiveness to family needs .....................................61 5. Intergovernmental Relations 62 5.1 General..........................................................................................................62 5.2 Meeting of the Joint Ministerial Committee.....................................................62 5.3 British-Irish Council sectoral meeting .............................................................63 5.4 Bilateral issues...............................................................................................63 5.5 Adjusting the devolution settlement................................................................64 5.6 UK Government’s ‘Draft Legislative Programme’ ...........................................64 6. European and External Relations 66 6.1 The Scottish Government’s International Strategy .........................................66 6.2 The Scottish Government’s European Strategy .............................................67 6.3 International Development .............................................................................68 6.4 The European and External Relations Committee of the Scottish Parliament 68 6.5 Homecoming 2009.........................................................................................69 7. Relations with Local Government 70 7.1 Local Income Tax ..........................................................................................70 7.2 Cabinet Talks.................................................................................................71 7.3 Scottish Futures Trust....................................................................................72 7.4 Council Housing.............................................................................................73 7.5 Scrutiny Bodies..............................................................................................75 7.6 Aberdeen City Council ...................................................................................76 7.7 Council dispute ..............................................................................................77 8. Finance 78 8.1 General..........................................................................................................78 8.2 Publication of Government Expenditure and Revenue in Scotland.................79 8.3 Scottish Futures Trust....................................................................................80 8.4 The proposed local
Load more

Recommended publications
  • November 2002
    Nations and Regions: The Dynamics of Devolution Quarterly Monitoring Programme Scotland Quarterly Report November 2002 The monitoring programme is jointly funded by the ESRC and the Leverhulme Trust Contents 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 4 2. The Scottish Parliament Mark Shephard 7 3. The Media Philip Schlesinger 11 4. Public Attitudes and identity John Curtice 14 5. Scotland/UK Relations Alex Wright 18 6. Scotland/International Relations Alex Wright 22 7. Relations with Local Government Neil McGarvey 27 9. Legal Disputes Barry Winetrobe 31 10. Political parties James Mitchell 32 11. Public policies Barry Winetrobe 34 2 Key points: James Mitchell — First Minister Jack McConnell became embroiled in an embarrassing internal constituency row over local party funds; — Culture Minister Mike Watson broke collective cabinet responsibility by speaking out—but not voting—against Executive health policy fearing that he might lose votes in the forthcoming Scottish elections; — Herald newspaper went up for sale with the prospect that it will be bought by owners of Scotsman rivals. 3 1. Scottish Executive Barry Winetrobe 1.1 Collective responsibility The application of the doctrine of collective responsibility has been under the spotlight in the Glasgow hospitals issue. The Culture Minister, Mike Watson, has been a leading public opponent of the reorganisation plan, but voted with the Executive in a debate on the issue on 12 September. His MPA, Janis Hughes, put herself in an even more unusual position, by abstaining on the Executive amendment to the critical SNP motion, but then voting for the as-amended motion. The First Minister refused to sack either, on the basis that they had both adhered to collective responsibility by their votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Regeneration Issue 30 (Spring 2005)
    Scottish Urban Regeneration Forum issue 30 : spring 2005 scotregensharing experience : shaping practice In this issue: • Cultural Planning, Liz Gardner and Lia Ghilardi – pg 1 and 3 • Making Waves, Cllr. Charlie Gordon – pg 8 • Coastal towns report, Roland Hahn – pg 4 • Financial Inclusion conference report, Mike Chapman – pg 12 • Congestion Charges, Cllr Andrew Burns – pg 6 • The Northern Way, Vince Taylor – pg 13 • and much more... now read on... Self Image- Artist Steven Healy's photo is part of the 'Mongrel' photography project commissioned Thinking by the Royston Road Association Culture CULTURAL PLANNING AND COMMUNITY PLANNING - a recipe for success? Liz Gardiner of Fablevision and Cultural Planning Consultant Lia Ghilardi, from the National Cultural Planning Steering Group, make the case for culture as an essential element of successful regeneration strategies. What is a joined-up Cultural Planning approach? A Cultural Planning approach starts not from the identification of all In Scotland and elsewhere, at neighbourhood, city, regional and the problems in a community and addressing them one by one or national levels, there is a growing realisation that culture can deliver separately. Instead it takes a holistic approach and puts culture and on many aspects of community engagement, empowerment and people at the core. It addresses jobs, training for employment, the leadership. However, so far, the policy framework for implementing development of new small to medium sized enterprises, planning, integrated cultural planning projects and schemes is still relatively and regeneration, but never in isolation from each other. underdeveloped. Many local authorities and community regeneration bodies still see culture as an add-on to existing The Cultural Planning approach has emerged as a way of enabling programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Ag/S3/11/06 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU
    Ag/S3/11/06 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU AGENDA FOR MEETING ON TUESDAY 22 FEBRUARY 2011 2 pm: Room Q1.03 1. Minutes (a) Draft minutes of 8 February 2011 (attached) (b) Matters arising 2. Future Business Programme (PB/S3/11/22) Procedural motions 3. Scottish Statutory Instruments (PB/S3/11/23) Legislation 4. Public Records (Scotland) Bill – Stage 2 referral and timetable (PB/S3/11/24) 5. Removal of motions from the Business Bulletin (PB/S3/11/25) 6. Publication scheme – consideration of any exempt papers 7. Date of next meeting – Tuesday 1 March 2011 PB/S3/11/22 PARLIAMENTARY BUREAU POSSIBLE MOTIONS FOR MEMBERS BUSINESS 1. Bureau Members will be aware that under Rule 5.6.1(c) the Bureau has a duty to ensure that there is a period of time available for Members’ Business following Decision Time. 2. Motions submitted for Members’ Business are shown below. S3M-7898# Duncan McNeil: 30th Anniversary of the Lee Jeans Sit-in—That the Parliament remembers the 240 women who staged what it sees as a historic sit-in at the Lee Jeans factory in Greenock 30 years ago, beginning on 5 February 1981; notes that the workers barricaded themselves into the canteen for seven months in protest at the decision to close the factory; salutes the workers for capturing the imagination of the whole country and achieving a landmark victory against a US multinational; wishes the former convener, Helen Monaghan, and machinists, Margaret Wallace and Catherine Robertson, well for the 30th anniversary reunion event that they have organised, and considers the Lee Jeans sit-in to be an inspiration to women workers all over the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY AND REGION Scottish SESSION 1 Parliament This Fact Sheet provides a list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the first parliamentary session, Fact sheet 12 May 1999-31 March 2003, arranged alphabetically by the constituency or region that they represented. Each person in Scotland is represented by 8 MSPs – 1 constituency MSPs: Historical MSP and 7 regional MSPs. A region is a larger area which covers a Series number of constituencies. 30 March 2007 This Fact Sheet is divided into 2 parts. The first section, ‘MSPs by constituency’, lists the Scottish Parliament constituencies in alphabetical order with the MSP’s name, the party the MSP was elected to represent and the corresponding region. The second section, ‘MSPs by region’, lists the 8 political regions of Scotland in alphabetical order. It includes the name and party of the MSPs elected to represent each region. Abbreviations used: Con Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party Green Scottish Green Party Lab Scottish Labour LD Scottish Liberal Democrats SNP Scottish National Party SSP Scottish Socialist Party 1 MSPs BY CONSTITUENCY: SESSION 1 Constituency MSP Region Aberdeen Central Lewis Macdonald (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen North Elaine Thomson (Lab) North East Scotland Aberdeen South Nicol Stephen (LD) North East Scotland Airdrie and Shotts Karen Whitefield (Lab) Central Scotland Angus Andrew Welsh (SNP) North East Scotland Argyll and Bute George Lyon (LD) Highlands & Islands Ayr John Scott (Con)1 South of Scotland Ayr Ian
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison: Essential Public Affairs for Journalists 6E
    Morrison: Essential Public Affairs for Journalists 6e CHAPTER 1: THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION AND MONARCHY TABLE 1A MAIN ENTITLEMENTS LISTED IN BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 Freedoms for all ‘Englishmen’ Sanctions for Roman Catholics Freedom from royal interference with the law— Ban on Catholics succeeding to English throne— sovereigns forbidden from establishing their own reflecting the supposed fact that ‘it hath been found courts, or acting as judge themselves by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this protestant kingdom to be governed by a papist prince’ Freedom from being taxed without Parliament’s Obligation on newly crowned sovereigns to swear agreement oaths of allegiance to Church of England Freedom to petition reigning monarch Freedom for Protestants only to possess ‘arms for Bar on carrying weapons defence’ Freedom from drafting into peacetime army without Parliament’s consent Freedom to elect MPs without sovereign’s interference Freedom from cruel and unusual punishments and excessive bail Freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial TABLE 1B RULES GOVERNING MONARCHICAL SUCCESSION IN THE ACT OF SETTLEMENT 1701 Details Protestants only The Crown should pass to Protestant descendants of Electress Sophie of Hanover (first cousin once removed of Queen Anne, who inherited throne after deaths of Mary and William) No marriages to Catholics Monarchs ‘shall join in communion’ with Church of England and not marry Roman Catholics England for the English If anyone not native to England inherits throne, the country will not wage war for ‘any dominions or territories which do not belong to the Crown of England without the consent of Parliament’ Loyalty from the Crown No monarch may leave ‘British Isles’ without Parliament’s consent (repealed by George I in 1716) Openness before Parliament All government matters within Privy Council’s jurisdiction (see p.
    [Show full text]
  • Lettre Conjointe De 1.080 Parlementaires De 25 Pays Européens Aux Gouvernements Et Dirigeants Européens Contre L'annexion De La Cisjordanie Par Israël
    Lettre conjointe de 1.080 parlementaires de 25 pays européens aux gouvernements et dirigeants européens contre l'annexion de la Cisjordanie par Israël 23 juin 2020 Nous, parlementaires de toute l'Europe engagés en faveur d'un ordre mondial fonde ́ sur le droit international, partageons de vives inquietudeś concernant le plan du president́ Trump pour le conflit israeló -palestinien et la perspective d'une annexion israélienne du territoire de la Cisjordanie. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par le preć edent́ que cela creerait́ pour les relations internationales en geń eral.́ Depuis des decennies,́ l'Europe promeut une solution juste au conflit israeló -palestinien sous la forme d'une solution a ̀ deux Etats,́ conformement́ au droit international et aux resolutionś pertinentes du Conseil de securit́ e ́ des Nations unies. Malheureusement, le plan du president́ Trump s'ecarté des parametres̀ et des principes convenus au niveau international. Il favorise un controlê israelień permanent sur un territoire palestinien fragmente,́ laissant les Palestiniens sans souverainete ́ et donnant feu vert a ̀ Israel̈ pour annexer unilateralement́ des parties importantes de la Cisjordanie. Suivant la voie du plan Trump, la coalition israelienné recemment́ composeé stipule que le gouvernement peut aller de l'avant avec l'annexion des̀ le 1er juillet 2020. Cette decisioń sera fatale aux perspectives de paix israeló -palestinienne et remettra en question les normes les plus fondamentales qui guident les relations internationales, y compris la Charte des Nations unies. Nous sommes profondement́ preoccuṕ eś par l'impact de l'annexion sur la vie des Israelienś et des Palestiniens ainsi que par son potentiel destabilisateuŕ dans la regioń aux portes de notre continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to Conference
    Reports to Conference Spring Conference 2016 REPORTS TO CONFERENCE SPRING 2016 Contents Federal Conference Committee ........................................................... 2 Federal Policy Committee .................................................................... 6 Federal Executive .............................................................................. 10 Federal Finance & Administration Committee .................................... 18 Parliamentary Party Report (Commons) ............................................ 22 Parliamentary Party Report (Lords) ................................................... 24 Parliamentary Party Report (Europe) ................................................. 28 Diversity Engagement Group ............................................................. 31 Campaign for Gender Balance .......................................................... 35 Federal Appeals Panel ...................................................................... 38 Federal Conference Committee Bournemouth 2015 Last autumn we held our conference in Bournemouth. This proves to be one of the more popular venues we visit with 88% of members rating it as an excellent or good venue for an autumn conference. We asked attendees how they felt about the earlier finish time on the final day. 60% of those that responded said they preferred the earlier finish time with only 9% saying they preferred to break for lunch. Next autumn we are trialing greater use of the weekend (see below for details). We will continue to ask all attendees
    [Show full text]
  • Crossing the Line Between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists' Use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen
    www.ssoar.info Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter Jukes, Stephen Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Jukes, S. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: exploring journalists' use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248-258. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2019, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 248–258 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v7i1.1772 Article Crossing the Line between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists’ Use of Twitter Stephen Jukes Faculty of Media and Communication, Bournemouth University, Poole, BH12 5BB, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] Submitted: 7 September 2018 | Accepted: 4 January 2018 | Published: 21 March 2019 Abstract Anglo-American journalism has typically drawn a firm dividing line between those who report the news and those who run the business of news. This boundary, often referred to in the West as a ‘Chinese Wall’, is designed to uphold the inde- pendence of journalists from commercial interests or the whims of news proprietors. But does this separation still exist in today’s age of social media and at a time when news revenues are under unprecedented pressure? This article focuses on Twitter, now a widely used tool in the newsroom, analysing the Twitter output of 10 UK political correspondents during the busy party conference season.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaelic – What Would Success Look Like?
    Alba 2030: Gaelic – what would success look like? Programme 09:00 Registration, tea and coffee 10:00 Welcome/opening remarks: Rt Hon Ken Macintosh MSP, Presiding Officer and Futures Forum Chair 10:05 Keynote contribution: Professor Wilson McLeod, University of Edinburgh 10:25 The Future for Gaelic: Panel discussion with Wilson McLeod, Mary Ann Kennedy and Tadhg Ó hIfearnáin. 11.10 Coffee break 11.25 Workshops 12.45 Feedback 12.55 Thanks/closing remarks 13:00 Networking lunch 14.00 Event finishes Speaker biographies Professor Wilson McLeod is Professor of Gaelic at the University of Edinburgh. He acts as director of research on Celtic and Scottish Studies, with research interests including language policy and planning issues in Scotland; language legislation and language rights; and the cultural politics of Scottish and Irish Gaelic literature. Wilson is a regular media commentator on the role of the Gaelic language in Scotland. Mary Ann Kennedy is a Scottish musician, writer, composer, broadcaster and music producer. She was born and brought up in Glasgow in a Gaelic- speaking household at the heart of the city’s language activism and development in the 1970s and 80s: her mother Dr Kenna Campbell MBE is a prominent cultural tradition-bearer and educator, and her father Alasdair was the documentary voice in print of the city’s traditional Gaelic and Highland communities. She is co-director of her own creative business, Watercolour Music, in the West Highlands, and has a particular passion for new writing and non-traditional forms of Gaelic-language music. She previously spent several years in BBC News, ultimately running the Gaelic-language news service.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports to Conference Spring 2015 Contents
    REPORTS TO CONFERENCE SPRING 2015 CONTENTS Contents Page Federal Conference Committee……….……………………….……………..4 Federal Policy Committee......................…………...……………………......9 Federal Executive.............………………... ………………………………...17 Federal Finance and Administration Committee………….….…..............25 Parliamentary Party (Commons)……………………………. ……………...29 …………. Parliamentary Party (Lords)………………………..………………………...35 Parliamentary Party (Europe)………………………….……………………..41 Campaign for Gender Balance……………………………………………...45 Diversity Engagement Group……………………………………………..…50 3 Federal Conference Committee Glasgow 2015 Last autumn we went back to Glasgow for the second year running. As in 2013 we received a superb welcome from the city. We continue to ask all attendees to complete an online feedback questionnaire. A good percentage complete this but I would urge all members to take the time to participate. It is incredibly useful to the conference office and FCC and does influence whether we visit a venue again and if we do, what changes we need to try and make. FCC Changes Following the committee elections at the end of last year there were a number of changes to the membership of FCC. Qassim Afzal, Louise Bloom, Sal Brinton, Prateek Buch, Veronica German, Evan Harris and David Rendel either did not restand or were not re-elected. All played a valuable role on FCC and will be missed. We welcome Jon Ball, Zoe O’Connell and Mary Reid onto the committee as directly elected members. FPC have elected two new representatives onto FCC and we welcome back Linda Jack and Jeremy Hargreaves in these roles. Both have previously served on FCC so are familiar with the way we work. One of the FE reps is also new with Kaavya Kaushik joining James Gurling as an FE rep on FCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2Nd Parliamentary Year
    Journal of the Scottish Parliament Volume 2: 2nd Parliamentary Year, Session 3 (9 May 2008 – 8 May 2009) SPJ 3.2 © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body Information on the Scottish Parliament’s copyright policy can be found on the website - www.scottish.parliament.uk or by contacting Public Information on 0131 348 5000. Foreword The Journal is the central, long-term, authoritative record of what the Parliament has done. The Minutes of Proceedings, which are produced for each meeting of the Parliament, do that in an immediate way, while the Journal presents essentially the same material but has the benefit of hindsight to allow any errors and infelicities of presentation to be corrected. Unlike the Official Report, which primarily records what is said, the Minutes of Proceedings, and in the longer term the Journal, provide the authoritative record of what was done. The Journal is required under Rule 16.3 of Standing Orders and contains, in addition to the Minutes of Proceedings themselves, notice of any Bill introduced*, notice of any instrument or draft instrument or any other document laid before the Parliament; notice of any report of a committee, and any other matter that the Parliament, on a motion of the Parliamentary Bureau, considers should be included. (* The requirement to include notice of Bills introduced was only added to Rule 16.3 in January 2003. However, such notices have in practice been recorded in the Annex to the Minutes of Proceedings from the outset.) Note: (DT), which appears throughout the Journal, signifies a decision taken at Decision Time.
    [Show full text]