DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study: Open Source CMS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Study: Open Source CMS ISSN (Online) : 2278-1021 ISSN (Print) : 2319-5940 International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014 Comparative Study: Open source CMS Sharayu A. Lokhande Department of Computer Engineering, Army Institute of Technology, Maharashtra, India Abstract: This paper explores various features of content management system. This includes a comparison of various open source CMS based on their features. Depending on the features one can find out the suitable open source CMS for their application. Here 13 open source CMS with their 10 main features has been studied like System Requirements, support, security, commerce etc. Index Terms: Content Management tools, features, Content. I. INTRODUCTION A study of 13 different open source CMS and their features [1] Alfresco, [2] TYPO3,[3] eZ Publish, [4] WebGUI, [5] are covered in the paper. It becomes easier to find out the DotNetNuke,[6] Drupal, [7] Xaraya,[8] XOOPS, [9] best content management system from a user and WordPress,[10] Cyclone3,[11] Daisy, [12] Bricolage, [13] developer’s point of view. Today, an increasing number of b2evolution open source solutions available in the market and become valid alternatives to closed solutions. Many companies III. FEATURES AVAILABILITY have already been forced to either remove or release as System requirement: Maximum features based on open source code borrowed by developers without properly the following requirement such as application Server, complying with licenses. Approximate Cost, Database, License, Operating System, Programming Language, Root Access, Shell II. THE ROLE OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE Access, Web Server are supported by the TYPO3 [2] Open source software plays an important role in cms. applications by allowing its basic software elements - Security : Most of the security features such as Audit virtual machine images and appliances to be created from Trail, Captcha, Content Approval, Email Verification, easily accessible components. This has an amplifying Granular Privileges , Kerberos Authentication, LDAP effect: Authentication , Login History, NIS Authentication, Developers, for example, can create a database NTLM Authentication, Pluggable Authentication, appliance by layering MySQL software onto an Problem Notification, Sandbox, Session Management, instance of the Open Solaris Operating System and SMB Authentication, SSL Compatible, SSL Logins, performing customizations. Appliances such as these SSL Pages, Versioning etc. are provides by Alfresco enable applications to be created, deployed, and [1]. dynamically scaled on demand. Support: Support for the following features Open Source Survey: In this paper we compared 13 Certification Program, Code Skeletons, Commercial open source CMS. These CMS has been compared Manuals, Commercial Support, Commercial Training, based on the following 10 main features: System Developer Community, Online Help, Pluggable AP, Requirements, Security, Support, Ease of Use, Professional Hosting, Professional Services, Public Performance, Management, Interoperability, Forum, Public Mailing List, Test Framework, Third- Flexibility, built-in application, Commence. We have Party Developers, Users Conference are equally rated each feature depending on the features it is provided by Alfresco [1],eZPublish [3] and supporting. The rating has been taken out of 5. DotNetNuke [5]. We recorded totally 10 main features for a CMS and Ease of Use: Ease of use features such as Drag-N- compared those features in these 13 CMS and Drop Content, Email To Discussion, Friendly URLs, generated a small report which feature can be taken Image Resizing, Macro Language, Mass Upload, from which CMS. Prototyping, Server Page Language, Site Setup Alfresco, TYPO3, eZ Publish, WebGUI, DotNetNuke, Wizard, Spell Checker, Style Wizard, Subscriptions, Drupal, Xaraya, XOOPS, WordPress, Cyclone3, Template Language, UI Levels, Undo, WYSIWYG Daisy, Bricolage, b2evolution. Editor, Zip Archives. The best product for these Following Table Represents ratings of 13 CMS. features is Alfresco [1], WebGUI [4]. COMPARITIVE STUDY OF CONTENT MANAGEMENT TOOLS Performance: The best performance based on the Tool1 Tool9 Tool8 Tool10 Tool6 Tool7 Tool12 Tool13 Tool11 Tool4 Tool5 Tool3 Tool2 below features Advanced Caching, Database FEATURE Alfresco TYPO3 eZ WebGUI DotNetNu Drupal Xaraya XOOPS WordPressCyclone3 Daisy Bricolage b2evoluti System 3.44 4. 3.88 3.33 3.67 3.56 3.55 3.4 3.72 2.7 3.3 2.8 3.5 Replication, Load Balancing, Page Caching, Static Security 4.5 3.71 4.1 4.15 3.86 3.55 3.67 3.5 3.41 3.4 3.3 3.2 4. Content Export are supported by Alfresco [1] Support 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.32 4. 3.9 3.5 3.5 3.5 4. 2. Ease of 4.5 4.42 3.9 4.5 4.11 3.75 3.07 3.11 3.73 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.5 ,eZPublish [3] WebGUI [4]. Performa 4.5 4.42 4.5 4.5 4. 3.7 3.5 3. 3.12 3.5 3.6 2.5 1.6 Managem 4.4 4.35 4.31 4.38 4.39 3.86 3.92 4.04 2.94 3.1 3.1 3.5 3. Management: The following managing features such Interoper 4.4 4.05 3.79 3.78 3.79 3.69 3.28 2.85 3.8 2.7 2.7 3.1 2.3 Flexibility 4.5 4.48 4.5 4.22 4.18 4.31 4.5 3.57 3.34 3.9 3.9 4.1 2.2 as Advertising Management, Asset Management, Built-in 4.3 4.23 3.87 3.76 3.8 3.9 3.5 4.07 3.58 2.9 2.5 2.2 2.1 Commerc 4.5 3.53 3.64 3.11 2.67 4.04 2.98 4.06 2. 2.8 2. 2. 2. Clipboard, Content Scheduling, Content Staging, Inline Administration, Online Administration, 4.35 4.15 4.1 4. 3.89 3.87 3.6 3.55 3.32 3.13 3.08 3.01 2.52 Table I Package Deployment, Sub-sites / Roots, Trash, Web Copyright to IJARCCE www.ijarcce.com 5831 ISSN (Online) : 2278-1021 ISSN (Print) : 2319-5940 International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering Vol. 3, Issue 3, March 2014 Statistics, Web-based Style/Template, Management, Most important feature such as management is being Web-based Translation Management, Workflow compared. Engine have been considered. The best available Interoperability issues are considered. product for these features is Alfresco [1]. Alfresco is Commerce is compared. lagging in Advertising Management. Amongst the Table I displays the rating of all the considered open source considered open source content management tools, no content management tools. From the table it can be clearly tool is satisfying the entire feature. A credit for conclude that Alfresco is the highest rating product Alfresco is 4.4. amongst all. Interoperability: It supports following features Table II and Table III shows the features supported by the Content Syndication (RSS), FTP Support, iCal, UTF- open source content management tools. 8 Support, WAI Compliant, WebDAV Support, and XHTML Compliant under interoperability. The best Following Table Represents availability of various features product which supports maximum interoperability in the 13 CMS. features Alfresco [1]. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. FEATURES Alfres TYPO3 eZ WebGUIDotNet Drup Xaraya Flexibility: Flexibility in terms of CGI-mode System Syste Syste Syst Syste Syste Syst Syste Application Any PHP Non mod_p IIS PHP Approximate $15,0 Free Free Free Free Free / Support, Content Reuse, Extensible User Profiles, Database Hiber MySQ MyS MySQL MSSQ MyS MySQ OperatingLicense + GNU LinuGNU GNU WindoBSD GNU GNU System Any Any x, Any ws Any Any Interface Localization, Metadata, Multi-lingual Programming Java PHP PHP Perl ASP.N PHP PHP Root Access No No No Yes No No No Shell Access No No No Yes No No No Web Server Any Apach Apac Apache IIS 5.0 Apac Any Content, Multi-lingual Content Integration, Multi-Site Security Secur Securi Sec Securit Securi Secu FreeSecuri Audit Trail Yes Yes Yes Yes Limited Yes Add Captcha Yes Free Free Yes Yes Free Free Deployment, URL Rewriting. The maximum Content Yes Yes Yes Limited Limited Yes Free Email Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Granular Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kerberos Yes Free No Free Free No No flexibility provided by the Alfresco [1], TYPO3 [2], LDAP Yes Free Yes Yes No Free Free Login History Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No NIS Yes Free No Free No No No eZPublish [3], Xaraya [7]. NTLM Yes Free Free Free Yes Free No Pluggable Yes Free Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Problem Yes Yes Cost Yes Yes No No Sandbox Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Free Built-in Applications: Following built-in Session Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes SMB Yes Free Free Free No No No SSL Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes applications has been considered Blog, Chat, SSL Logins Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes SSL Pages Yes Free Yes Yes Yes No Yes Versioning Yes Yes Yes Yes Limited Yes Free Support Supp Suppo Sup Suppo Suppo Sup Suppo Classifieds, Contact Management, Data Entry, Certification Yes No Yes No Yes No No Code Yes Free Yes Yes Yes Yes Limite Commercial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Database Reports, Discussion / Forum, Document Commercial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Commercial Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Developer Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Management, Events Calendar, Events Management, Online Help Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Pluggable API Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Professional Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Professional Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Expense Reports, FAQ Management, File Public Forum Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Public Mailing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Test Yes Free Yes Yes Yes Free Yes Distribution, Graphs and Charts, Groupware, Guest Third-Party Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Users Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Ease of Use Ease Ease Ease Ease Ease Ease Ease Drag-N-Drop Yes Free No Yes Yes Free No Book, Help Desk / Bug Reporting, HTTP Proxy, Email To Yes Free No Yes Costs Free Free Friendly URLs Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Image Yes Yes Yes Yes Free Free No Weather, Web Services Front End, Wiki, User Macro Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Free Yes Mass Upload Yes Free Yes Yes Yes Free Free Prototyping Yes Free Yes Yes Yes Limit Yes Server Page Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Contributions, Time Tracking etc.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TYPO3 Security Guide
    TYPO3 Security Guide Extension Key: doc_guide_security Language: en Version: 1.0.0 Keywords: security forEditors forAdmins forDevelopers forBeginners forIntermediates forAdvanced Copyright 2011, Documentation Team <[email protected]> This document is published under the Open Content License available from http://www.opencontent.org/opl.shtml The content of this document is related to TYPO3 - a GNU/GPL CMS/Framework available from www.typo3.org Official Documentation This document is included as part of the official TYPO3 documentation. It has been approved by the TYPO3 Documentation Team following a peer-review process. The reader should expect the information in this document to be accurate - please report discrepancies to the Documentation Team ([email protected]). Official documents are kept up-to-date to the best of the Documentation Team's abilities. Guide This document is a Guide. Guides are designed to familiarize a reader with a specific topic in order to provide a working knowledge of that particular process. Readers should peruse the guide from cover to cover in order to gain a practical overview of the process. Once completed, the Guide becomes a practical reference tool that a reader will refer to as needed. Guides offer advice on how best to achieve a given task. TYPO3 Security Guide - doc_guide_security TYPO3 Security Guide Table of Contents TYPO3 Security Guide............................1 Directory indexing........................................................12 Introduction...................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • TYPO3 / Wordpress / Drupal
    civi listen GmbH Schwedenstr. 15a 13357 Berlin jobs@civi listen.de www. civi listen.de Freelance Entwickler*in Frontend / Backend (m/w/d) TYPO3 / Wordpress / Drupal Was wir machen Wir sind die civi listen. Wir digitalisieren die Zivilgesellschaft. Unsere Kunden verbessern die Welt und wir sorgen dafür, dass sie dabei nichts aufhält. Dafür unterstützen wir seit 2018 gemeinnützige Organisationen mit praktischen Hilfestellungen digitaler und damit effizienter zu werden. CiviCRM ist dabei eine Lösung, die wir anbieten, um Beziehungen zwischen NGOs, Stiftungen und Vereinen zu ihren Stakeholdern und Zielgruppen verbessern – vom personalisierten Mailing bis zur Organisation von Events, Kampagnen und Fundraising. Wir entwickeln Auftritte, die gut aussehen und den richtigen Ton treffen. Wir helfen Herausforderungen und Prozesse smart und zuverlässig zu bewältigen. Wen wir suchen Wir wollen unsere Kunden jederzeit flexibel mit der besten Expertise unterstützen und glauben daran, dass Akteure der Zivilgesellschaft die besten Lösungen brauchen. Zur Unterstützung unseres Teams suchen wir zum nächstmöglichen Zeitpunkt eine*n erfahrene*n Entwickler*in TYPO3 / Wordpress / Drupal (m/w/d) civi listen GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin 030 692 090 200 Kopf frei für Hands on. Schwedenstr. 15 a Registergericht: Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 218551 B jobs@civi listen.de 13357 Berlin Geschäftsführer: Patrick Förg www. civi listen.de 1/4 Deine Aufgaben Wir erstellen für unsere CiviCRM-Kunden anspruchsvolle Internetauftritte und Spezialfunktionen mit TYPO3, Wordpress,
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Web Scanning Presentation
    Next generation web scanning New Zealand: A case study First presented at KIWICON III 2009 By Andrew Horton aka urbanadventurer NZ Web Recon Goal: To scan all of New Zealand's web-space to see what's there. Requirements: – Targets – Scanning – Analysis Sounds easy, right? urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Targets urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Targets What does 'NZ web-space' mean? It could mean: •Geographically within NZ regardless of the TLD •The .nz TLD hosted anywhere •All of the above For this scan it means, IPs geographically within NZ urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Finding Targets We need creative methods to find targets urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com DNS Zone Transfer urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com Find IP addresses on IRC and by resolving lots of NZ websites 58.*.*.* 60.*.*.* 65.*.*.* 91.*.*.* 110.*.*.* 111.*.*.* 113.*.*.* 114.*.*.* 115.*.*.* 116.*.*.* 117.*.*.* 118.*.*.* 119.*.*.* 120.*.*.* 121.*.*.* 122.*.*.* 123.*.*.* 124.*.*.* 125.*.*.* 130.*.*.* 131.*.*.* 132.*.*.* 138.*.*.* 139.*.*.* 143.*.*.* 144.*.*.* 146.*.*.* 150.*.*.* 153.*.*.* 156.*.*.* 161.*.*.* 162.*.*.* 163.*.*.* 165.*.*.* 166.*.*.* 167.*.*.* 192.*.*.* 198.*.*.* 202.*.*.* 203.*.*.* 210.*.*.* 218.*.*.* 219.*.*.* 222.*.*.* 729,580,500 IPs. More than we want to try. urbanadventurer (Andrew Horton) www.morningstarsecurity.com IP address blocks in the IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry Prefix Designation Date Whois Status [1] -----
    [Show full text]
  • Dialogic® Powermedia™ XMS JSR 309 Connector Software Release 5.2 Installation and Configuration Guide with Oracle Communications Converged Application Server 5.1
    Dialogic® PowerMedia™ XMS JSR 309 Connector Software Release 5.2 Installation and Configuration Guide with Oracle Communications Converged Application Server 5.1 July 2016 Rev 2.0 www.dialogic.com Copyright and Legal Notice Copyright © 2016 Dialogic Corporation. All Rights Reserved. You may not reproduce this document in whole or in part without permission in writing from Dialogic Corporation at the address provided below. All contents of this document are furnished for informational use only and are subject to change without notice and do not represent a commitment on the part of Dialogic Corporation and its affiliates or subsidiaries ("Dialogic"). Reasonable effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in the document. However, Dialogic does not warrant the accuracy of this information and cannot accept responsibility for errors, inaccuracies or omissions that may be contained in this document. INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH DIALOGIC® PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN A SIGNED AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND DIALOGIC, DIALOGIC ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND DIALOGIC DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF DIALOGIC PRODUCTS INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT OF A THIRD PARTY. Dialogic products are not intended for use in certain safety-affecting situations. Please see http://www.dialogic.com/company/terms-of-use.aspx for more details. Due to differing national regulations and approval requirements, certain Dialogic products may be suitable for use only in specific countries, and thus may not function properly in other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Coevolution of Source Code and Software Architecture Models the Karlsruhe Series on Software Design and Quality Volume 23
    The Karlsruhe Series on Software Design and Quality 23 Automated Coevolution of Source Code and Software Architecture Models Michael Langhammer Automated Coevolution of Source Code Automated Coevolution of Source Models Architecture and Software Michael Langhammer Michael Langhammer Automated Coevolution of Source Code and Software Architecture Models The Karlsruhe Series on Software Design and Quality Volume 23 Chair Software Design and Quality Faculty of Computer Science Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Software Engineering Division Research Center for Information Technology (FZI), Karlsruhe Editor: Prof. Dr. Ralf Reussner Automated Coevolution of Source Code and Software Architecture Models by Michael Langhammer Dissertation, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie KIT-Fakultät für Informatik Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 10. Februar 2017 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ralf H. Reussner Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Colin Atkinson (Universität Mannheim) Impressum Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) KIT Scientific Publishing Straße am Forum 2 D-76131 Karlsruhe KIT Scientific Publishing is a registered trademark of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Reprint using the book cover is not allowed. www.ksp.kit.edu This document – excluding the cover, pictures and graphs – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en The cover page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.en Print on Demand 2019 – Gedruckt auf FSC-zertifiziertem Papier ISSN 1867-0067 ISBN 978-3-7315-0783-3 DOI: 10.5445/KSP/1000081447 Abstract To develop complex software systems, source code and other artefacts, such as architectural models and behaviour descriptions, are used.
    [Show full text]
  • 840 Presentation
    UNTANGLING A TANGLED WEB: a case study in choosing and implementing a CMS T. L. Huttenlock, J. W. Beaird, R. W. Fordham Library Hi Tech 24(1): 61-68 Heather Braum, LI840, 10/07 1 Case Study Information Location: Buswell Memorial Library, Wheaton College (IL) Project: Process of choosing content management system (CMS) Study Type: Reflective case study Findings: Overview of the entire process of choosing the library’s CMS Heather Braum, LI840, 10/07 2 “Old” Days First years of web design: Dreamweaver, FrontPage or other HTML editor Had to know complicated code Software installed on each user’s computer Difficult to use, even after training Expensive commercial licensing Many website updates had to go through multiple people...complicated process in the “old” way Heather Braum, LI840, 10/07 3 What is a CMS? A content management system (CMS) is a software (typically web-based) application that manages content, such as computer files, audio, video, images, and web content, and allows a large number of users to make changes. (Wikipedia1) A web CMS is a web application used for creating and managing a large, dynamic collection of web material. It allows users with little or no training in programming/code to make changes to an existing website. It is essentially a website maintenance tool for non-technical administrators. (Wikipedia2) 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_management_systems 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_content_management_system Heather Braum, LI840, 10/07 4 How CMS works Many CMS are open source Installed on a server (typically with PHP and MySQL installed -- programming software) The setup of a CMS does take some technical skill But the end-user side is easy Today, many people use a CMS without ever realizing it Heather Braum, LI840, 10/07 5 Examples of CMS Wordpress--KLOW1 CMS (http://www.wordpress.org/) MoveableType (http://www.moveabletype.org/) MediaWiki--Wikipedia2 CMS (http://www.mediawiki.org) TikiWiki (http://www.tikiwiki.org/) Drupal (http://www.drupal.org/) Web GUI (http://www.plainback.com/webgui) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • OSS Watch National Software Survey 2008
    OSS Watch National Software Survey 2008 Ramón Casero Cañas Acknowledgements Publication information The survey was prepared and the report written by Ramón This survey report is licensed under the Creative Commons Casero Cañas (OSS Watch), and edited by Ross Gardler and Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 England & Wales licence. Elena Blanco (OSS Watch), and Pete Cooper. OSS Watch National Software Survey 2008 However, there are many people who helped to make it pos- Ramón Casero Cañas sible. We would like to thank the ICT directors of the FE and HE institutions, who took the time to respond to the survey First edition, published February 2009. and send feedback to us; Dr Ellen Helsper (Oxford Internet Institute) for her advice, academic input and support; Randy Metcalfe, former OSS Watch Service Manager, who set us with this task and was always a source of encouragement and support; Michael Fraser, former OSS Watch Director, for his comments; Gabriel Hanganu, Stuart Yeates and Rowan Wilson (OSS Watch) for their comments, envelope stuffing, corrections and so much more; Laura Marriott and Beverley McNichols for their data collection; Jean Davis and Sally Hard- ing for envelope stuffing; Barry Cornelius, Dominic Hargreaves, Charles Hutchings, Liz Masterman, Denise McDonough, Stuart Lee, Janet McKnight, Howard Noble, Mark Norman, Catrin Radcliffe and Peter Robinson for their comments about the online questionnaire; Judy McAuliffe, Tina Dick, Leslie Ferguson, Fran Jackson, Bruce Shakespeare, Jane Truby and Wendy Simmonds for their help with administration
    [Show full text]
  • A Method for a Small Web Site to Add Some Video Sharing Features
    LiU-ITN-TEK-A--08/013--SE A method for a small web site to add some video sharing features Juan Lucas Madurga Martín-Serrano 2008-01-31 Department of Science and Technology Institutionen för teknik och naturvetenskap Linköping University Linköpings Universitet SE-601 74 Norrköping, Sweden 601 74 Norrköping LiU-ITN-TEK-A--08/013--SE A method for a small web site to add some video sharing features Examensarbete utfört i datavetenskap vid Tekniska Högskolan vid Linköpings unversitet Juan Lucas Madurga Martín-Serrano Examinator Bengt Lennartsson Norrköping 2008-01-31 Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under en längre tid från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extra- ordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns det lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/ Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet - or its possible replacement - for a considerable time from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drupal Decision
    The Drupal Decision Stephen Sanzo | Director of Marketing and Business Development | Isovera [email protected] www.isovera.com Agenda 6 Open Source 6 The Big Three 6 Why Drupal? 6 Overview 6 Features 6 Examples 6 Under the Hood 6 Questions (non-technical, please) Open Source Software “Let the code be available to all!” 6 Software that is available in source code form for which the source code and certain other rights normally reserved for copyright holders are provided under a software license that permits users to study, change, and improve the software. 6 Adoption of open-source software models has resulted in savings of about $60 billion per year to consumers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_software www.isovera.com Open Source Software However… Open source doesn't just mean access to the source code. The distribution terms of open-source software must comply criteria established by the Open Source Initiative. http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd www.isovera.com Open Source Software Free as in… Not this… www.isovera.com Open Source CMS Advantages for Open Source CMS 6 No licensing fees - allows you to obtain enterprise quality software at little to no cost 6 Vendor flexibility - you can choose whether or not you want to hire a vendor to help you customize, implement, and support it, or do this internally. If at any point along the way you decide you don’t like your vendor, you are free to find another. 6 Software flexibility – in many cases, proprietary software is slow to react to the markets needs.
    [Show full text]
  • CMS Matrix - Cmsmatrix.Org - the Content Management Comparison Tool
    CMS Matrix - cmsmatrix.org - The Content Management Comparison Tool http://www.cmsmatrix.org/matrix/cms-matrix Proud Member of The Compare Stuff Network Great Data, Ugly Sites CMS Matrix Hosting Matrix Discussion Links About Advertising FAQ USER: VISITOR Compare Search Return to Matrix Comparison <sitekit> CMS +CMS Content Management System eZ Publish eZ TikiWiki 1 Man CMS Mambo Drupal Joomla! Xaraya Bricolage Publish CMS/Groupware 4.6.1 6.10 1.5.10 1.1.5 1.10 1024 AJAX CMS 4.1.3 and 3.2 1Work 4.0.6 2F CMS Last Updated 12/16/2006 2/26/2009 1/11/2009 9/23/2009 8/20/2009 9/27/2009 1/31/2006 eZ Publish 2flex TikiWiki System Mambo Joomla! eZ Publish Xaraya Bricolage Drupal 6.10 CMS/Groupware 360 Web Manager Requirements 4.6.1 1.5.10 4.1.3 and 1.1.5 1.10 3.2 4Steps2Web 4.0.6 ABO.CMS Application Server Apache Apache CGI Other Other Apache Apache Absolut Engine CMS/news publishing 30EUR + system Open-Source Approximate Cost Free Free Free VAT per Free Free (Free) Academic Portal domain AccelSite CMS Database MySQL MySQL MySQL MySQL MySQL MySQL Postgres Accessify WCMS Open Open Open Open Open License Open Source Open Source AccuCMS Source Source Source Source Source Platform Platform Platform Platform Platform Platform Accura Site CMS Operating System *nix Only Independent Independent Independent Independent Independent Independent ACM Ariadne Content Manager Programming Language PHP PHP PHP PHP PHP PHP Perl acms Root Access Yes No No No No No Yes ActivePortail Shell Access Yes No No No No No Yes activeWeb contentserver Web Server Apache Apache
    [Show full text]
  • Kosten Senken Dank Open Source?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Kosten senken dank Open Source? provided by Bern Open Repository andStrategien Information System (BORIS) | downloaded: 13.3.2017 https://doi.org/10.7892/boris.47380 source: 36 Nr. 01/02 | Februar 2014 Swiss IT Magazine Strategien Kosten senken dank Open Source? Mehr Geld im Portemonnaie und weniger Sorgen im Gepäck Der Einsatz von Open Source Software kann das IT-Budget schonen, wenn man richtig vorgeht. Viel wichtiger sind aber strategische Vorteile wie die digitale Nachhaltigkeit oder die Unabhängigkeit von Herstellern, die sich durch den konsequenten Einsatz von Open Source ergeben. V ON D R . M ATTHIAS S TÜR M ER ines vorweg: Open Source ist nicht gra- tis. Oder korrekt ausgedrückt: Der Download von Open Source Software (OSS) von den vielen Internet-Portalen wieE Github, Google Code, Sourceforge oder Freecode ist selbstverständlich kostenlos. Aber wenn Open-Source-Lösungen professionell eingeführt und betrieben werden, verursacht dies interne und/oder externe Kosten. Geschäftskritische Lösungen benötigen stets zuverlässige Wartung und Support, ansonsten steigt das Risiko erheblich, dass zentrale Infor- matiksysteme ausfallen oder wichtige Daten verloren gehen oder gestohlen werden. Für den sicheren Einsatz von Open Source Soft- ware braucht es deshalb entweder interne INHALT Ressourcen und Know-how, wie die entspre- chenden Systeme betrieben werden. Oder es MEHR GELD im PORTemoNNaie UND weNIGER SorgeN im GEPÄck 36 wird ein Service Level Agreement (SLA) bei- MarkTÜbersicHT: 152 SCHweiZer OPEN-SOUrce-SPEZialisTEN 40 spielsweise in Form einer Subscription mit einem kommerziellen Anbieter von Open- SpareN ODER NICHT spareN 48 Source-Lösungen abgeschlossen.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuzzy Attacks on Web Logs
    Institut für Technische Informatik und Kommunikationsnetze Laura Peer Fuzzy Attacks on Web Logs Group Thesis (GA)-2011-09 August 2011 to September 2011 Tutor: David Gugelmann Co-Tutor: Dr. Stephan Neuhaus Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Plattner 2 Abstract Oftentimes, weaknesses in web applications arise because input is not properly validated. Web programmers can make mistakes or may simply not conceive of every possible input scenario provided to their application. In this thesis we use the method of fuzzing, the automated process of feeding pseudo random input data to a program, to test web applications for bugs. Our target applications are web logs. With the help of a small program which was written for our specific task, we have discovered a number of problems and vulnerabilities. 3 4 Contents 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Motivation........................................7 1.2 The Task........................................7 1.3 Related Work......................................8 1.4 Overview........................................9 2 Background 11 2.1 Fuzzing......................................... 11 2.1.1 The Fuzzing Process............................. 11 2.1.2 Random Data Generation........................... 11 2.1.3 Vulnerabilities.................................. 12 2.2 Fuzzing the HTTP Protocol.............................. 16 2.2.1 Client to Server Transmission Analysis.................... 16 2.2.2 Server Response and Detection Methods.................. 18 2.3 Web Application Input................................. 19 3 Design 21 3.1 Analyzing the Web Log with a Web Crawler..................... 23 3.2 The HTTP Communication Interface......................... 23 3.3 Fuzzed Data Generation................................ 24 3.4 The Main Program Loop................................ 24 3.4.1 Working with the Web Sniffer Output..................... 24 3.4.2 The FuzzField Class.............................. 25 3.5 Error Detection Mechanisms............................
    [Show full text]