KMK Legal Update Seminar Wednesday, December 3, 2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Who Rules Cincinnati?
Who Rules Cincinnati? A Study of Cincinnati’s Economic Power Structure And its Impact on Communities and People By Dan La Botz Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Published by Cincinnati Studies www.CincinnatiStudies.org Copyright ©2008 by Dan La Botz Table of Contents Summary......................................................................................................... 1 Preface.............................................................................................................4 Introduction.................................................................................................... 7 Part I - Corporate Power in Cincinnati.........................................................15 Part II - Corporate Power in the Media and Politics.....................................44 Part III - Corporate Power, Social Classes, and Communities......................55 Part IV - Cincinnati: One Hundred Years of Corporate Power.....................69 Discussion..................................................................................................... 85 Bibliography.................................................................................................. 91 Acknowledgments.........................................................................................96 About the Author...........................................................................................97 Summary This investigation into Cincinnati’s power structure finds that a handful of national and multinational corporations dominate -
The Beyond Civility Update
feature article Beyond Civility — !"#$%& By Robert W. Rack, Jr. wo years ago, on the 10th initiatives now behind us, we’d like to person and would be more likely to listen anniversary of September 11th, share some of the lessons learned. to what he or she had to say in the future. two prominent members of our First, we learned from recent stud- Many were surprised by the change in TBar, Tim Burke and Alex Trianta!lou, ies in psychology and neuroscience that their attitude. Trespectively the chairmen of the people form what moral psychologist It seems these personal stories trans- Hamilton Country Democratic and Jonathan Haidt calls our “moral intu- formed the presenters in the audience’s Republican Parties, issued a joint press itions” early in life. $ese beliefs steer our eyes from political symbols to people release suggesting core values that thinking and listening into and through with families and in%uences and troubles both parties and all Americans hold in adulthood. $ey dictate whom we trust much like their own, opening the space common. Soon a"er, partly inspired and believe and what we accept as true or for empathy and enabling a more genu- by that press release, a group of judges, false. As anyone who has tried to change ine human connection. lawyers, and other In a unique event we civic leaders formed called a Back-to-Back, Repub- Beyond Civility: While changing minds was not the goal, lican State Rep. Lou Blessing Communication for and Democratic State Rep. E#ective Governance opening minds was, and that appears to Denise Driehaus bravely took (beyondcivility. -
Abstract a Political Economic Analysis of Cincinnati's
ABSTRACT A POLITICAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CINCINNATI’S DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT SCHEME CENTERED AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROFESSIONAL SPORTS STADIA James Anthony Brown The purpose of this analytical case study is to explore the political economy of stadium construction and the urban growth strategy and redevelopment scheme that occurred in Cincinnati covering the years from 1993 to 2003. This case study was developed to provide an integrated view of the historical, social, economic, and political forces that defined the conditions in which this strategy was embedded within the class factions of the dominant. Information gathered to develop this study included mainstream newspaper accounts (including those from the newspaper’s website), and miscellaneous articles and texts. The city’s professional sports franchise’s (i.e., the Cincinnati Bengals’) complaints of economic downturn were blamed on, and due to, Riverfront Stadium’s inadequate number of revenue producers (e.g., lack of sufficient number of skyboxes, club seats, and a restaurant) compared with league (NFL) averages. The franchise’s relocation threats garnered certain city and county leaders’ support in providing a new stadium to prevent their departure and paved the way for a new image and re-birth of downtown Cincinnati—economically, physically, and socially. Such support was not monolithic evidence of a lack of consensus in what might have been presumed to be a hegemonic elite. While most of the information gathered for this thesis stemmed from mainstream sources that are often the vehicles from the perspectives of the dominant, my use of the “official” media is selective and primarily empirical. A critical analysis is provided. -
2020 Voter Guide
2020 THREE WAYS TO VOTE VOTER NOVEMBER GUIDE 3 NONPARTISAN VOTER INFORMATION VOTE BY MAIL VIA VOTE EARLY AT THE VOTE IN-PERSON AT COVERING HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO ABSENTEE BALLOT BOARD OF ELECTIONS YOUR POLLING PLACE FEATURED IN THIS GUIDE: HOW TO VOTE: About this guide ...................................................................... 02 How to vote by mail ................................................................02 Where and when to vote early .......................................02 About your polling place ....................................................02 What ID to bring to the poll ...............................................03 WHO ARE MY CANDIDATES? FEDERAL President of the United States .........................................03 United States House of Representatives..................03 STATE Ohio State Senator .................................................................05 Ohio State Representative .................................................05 Ohio State Supreme Court Justice ............................. 09 Ohio State Appellate Court Judge ................................10 LOCAL Hamilton County Officials .................................................... 11 Hamilton Co. Court of Common Pleas Judges ....16 WHAT ARE MY BALLOT ISSUES? Local City and Village Issues ............................................. 21 ELECTION INFORMATION YOU NEED Cincinnati Public Schools Tax Levy ..............................22 Norwood City Schools Tax Levy .....................................23 Winton Woods City Schools -
Central Riverfront Urban Design Master Plan
Hamilton County/Cincinnati Central Riverfront Urban Design Master Plan Prepared by urban design associates Prepared for Hamilton County and The City of Cincinnati april2000 urban design associates Table of Contents Acknowledgements Executive Summary 1 1 Summary of the Plan 1i Planning Process Planning Process 8 i Concept Plan 1i Final Urban Design Master Plan Urban Design Analysis 13 i Concept Plan Focus Groups 1i Urban Design X-Rays® Urban Design Principles 17 Frameworks 26 Development Program 30 Urban Design Master Plan 33 i Urban Design Master Plan ii Urban Design Initiatives Urban Design Guidelines for The Banks 58 i Urban Design Guidelines ii Architectural Guidelines iii Streets and Parking iv City Streetscape Standards Appendix 84 ZHA Report Broadway Commons Plan ERA Report Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Memorandum The Banks urban design associates Central Riverfront Urban Design Master Plan Acknowledgements Steering Committee City of Cincinnati Hamilton County Charlie Luken Bob Bedinghaus Mayor, City of Cincinnati Hamilton County Commissioner Minette Cooper John S. Dowlin ViceMayor, City of Cincinnati Hamilton County Commissioner Paul Booth Tom Neyer Jr. City Council Member Hamilton County Commissioner Pat DeWine David J. Krings City Council Member Hamilton County Administrator Phil Heimlich City Council Member Former City Council Members Todd Portune Roxanne Qualls City Council Member Tyronne K. Yates Alicia Reece City Council Member Jeanette Cissell James R. Tarbell Bobbie Sterne City Council Member Dwight Tillery Charles Winburn City Council Member Former County Commissioners John Shirey City Manager Guy C. Guckenberger urban design associates Central Riverfront Urban Design Master Plan Riverfront Advisors Commission County &City Staff Jack Rouse Susanne Burke Chairman Director, Administrative Services David Anderson Terry Evans Clifford A. -
Catalytic Development: (Re)Creating Walkable Urban Places
Catalytic development: (Re)creating walkable urban places Christopher B. Leinberger and Tracy Hadden Loh May 2018 The Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Initiative on Innovation and Placemaking 1 Catalytic development About the authors Christopher B. Leinberger is a land use strategist, teacher, developer, researcher, and author, balancing business realities with social and environmental concerns. Mr. Leinberger is the Charles Bendit Distinguished Scholar and Research Professor and Chair of the Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis at the George Washington University School of Business. He has been affiliated with The Brookings Institution since 2005 as a Visiting Fellow and as a Nonresident Senior Fellow. Tracy Hadden Loh is a data scientist at the Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis at the George Washington University School of Business. Dr. Loh's research explores the idea of metropolitan areas as emergent systems, and applies data mining, simulation, statistical modeling, and geographic analysis to topics such as commercial real estate, stormwater management, and bicycle facility network planning. Her PhD in city and regional planning is from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The research described in this paper was partially funded through a gift to The George Washington University from Bedrock, the real estate subsidiary of the Rock Ventures Family of Companies, which includes Quicken Loans. Other funding has come from the Board of Advisors of the GWU Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis. Neither author has had, or currently has, any financial interest in any of the six case studies that formed the basis of this research.