Icons May Be Seen As a Primary Form of Religious Image
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE VISUAL PORTRAYAL OF MARY MAGDALENE: A CASE STUDY IN FEMINIST ETHICAL ISSUES by DIANA MARY CORMICK submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF THEOLOGY in the subject THEOLOGICAL ETHICS at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: PROF L D HULLEY JOINT SUPERVISOR: PROF C LANDMAN NOVEMBER 1992 Mary Magdalene detail from 'Noli me tangere' Giotto di Bondone (1267-1337] Church of S. Francesco, Assisi. (Eimerl 1973:frontispiece) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS vii xv PREFACE INTRODUCTION xvii CHAPTER ONE: AN EXAMINATION OF THE VISUAL TRADITION IN CHRISTIANITY IN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH Introduction 1 1 Written texts and aural imagery 1 1.1. Parables in the teaching example of Jesus 3 1.2. Christian symbolism 5 1.2.1. Emblems 6 . 1.3. Liturgical symbolism 7 1.3.1. Liturgical worship 9 1.3.2. Symbolic movement 11 1.4. Additional religious signs 13 1.5. Religious images 14 1.5.1. Historical use of images in Christianity 15 1.6. Value of images in theology 16 Conclusion 21 CHAPTER TWO: AN EXPLORATION OF THE TWO MOST POPULAR VISUAL IMAGES OF WOMEN FROM A CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE: THE VIRGIN MARY AND MARY MAGDALENE Introduction 22 2. Woman as imaged in Christian Art 23 2.1. The most popular images of women: Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene 27 2.1.1. Introducing the Virgin Mary 29 2.1.1.1. The second Eve 30 2.1.2. Images of the Virgin Mary in Christian Art 37 2.1.2.1. The ethic of woman which developed from iii the influence of the imagery of the Virgin Mary and Eve 41 2.2. Introducing Mary Magdalene 42 2.2.1. The composite figure of Mary Magdalene 43 2.2.2. A fascination with Mary Magdalene 45 2.2.3. Mary Magdalene becomes 'archetypal' 47 Conclusion 47 CHAPTER THREE: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CULT OF MARY MAGDALENE BASED ON HISTORICAL AND HAGIOGRAPHICAL LEGENDARY TRADITIONS Introduction 49 3. Mary Magdalene 49 3.1. Historical tradition 50 3.1.1. Canonical texts 50 3.1.1.1. Orthodox scriptural figure 51 [a] Biblical exegesis of Mary Magdalene in the New Testament 51 3.1.2. Non-canonical, Apochryphal, Gnostic texts 59 3.1.3. The significance of the findings 60 3.1.3.1. The orthodox teaching: Mary Magdalene as an ordinary woman, plays a minor role in salvation history 62 3.1.3.2. The Gnostic teaching: Mary Magdalene has prominent role in salvation history 64 3.2. Hagiographical legendary tradition 70 3.2.1. The Mary Magdalene legends 72 3.3. The demotion of Mary Magdalene 76 3.3.1. Misogyny in the Christian Church 78 3.3.2. The penitent Mary Magdalene 79 Conclusion 80 CHAPTER FOUR: THE VISUAL PORTRAYAL OF MARY MAGDALENE AS REPRESENTED WITHIN THREE CLASSIFICATIONS: PENITENT, PROSTITUTE AND 'BEATA' Introduction 81 4. The tri-partite imagic representation of Mary Magdalene: scriptural, hagiographic and beatific 82 iv [a] Scriptural imagery 82 [b] Hagiographic imagery 84 [c] Beatific imagery 85 4.1. The three modes of characterisation: penitent, prostitute or saint 86 [a] Mary Magdalene as penitent 86 [b] Mary Magdalene as prostitute 87 [c] Mary Magdalene as saint 89 4.2. Iconography of Mary Magdalene 89 4.2.1. Symbolism used in images of Mary Magdalene 94 [1] Colour symbolism 94 [2] Jar of ointment 97 [3] Long flowing hair 99 [4] Nakedness 101 [5] Rich clothing 105 [6] Over-turned casket of jewels 106 [7] Skull and crucifix 107 [8] Tear-filled eyes 108 [9] Reading the scriptures 109 4.3. Comparative analysis of a selected group of artworks 111 4.3.1. Images depicting Mary Magdalene as 'penitent' 111 4.3.2. Images depicting Mary Magdalene as 'prostitute' 116 4.3.3. Images depicting Mary Magdalene as 'beata' 120 4.4. Practical reaction to the visual imagery 123 Conclusion 124 CHAPTER FIVE: A CRITICAL FEMINIST EVALUATION OF THE VISUAL . PORTRAYAL OF MARY MAGDALENE AS PREDETERMINED AND MEDIATED BY THE PATRIARCHAL CHURCH Introduction 125 5. The judgement of Mary Magdalene's character: towards a feminist ethical understanding 126 5.1. Presentation of a feminist critical hermeneutics 126 5.1.1. A hermeneutic of suspicion 129 5.1.1.1. A feminist "lost coin" 130 v 5.1.2. A hermeneutic of proclamation 137 5.1.2.1. Condemnation not proclamation 138 5.1.2.2. "Women are not to teach" 141 5.1.3. A hermeneutic of remembrance 144 5.1.3.1. The problem with Mary Magdalene's discredited past: a prejudiced editing of text 145 5.1.3.2. Women's experience of oppression and sin 149 5.1.3.3. Mary Magdalene as the "resurrected woman" 151 5.1.4. A hermeneutic of "creative actualization" 155 5.1.4.1. Towards reclaiming Mary Magdalene through the creation of positive imagery 156 5.1.4.2. The contribution of women to the Jesus movement 158 5.1.4.3. Cherishing the women's stories through positive imagery: The "Heroic Women Series" 165 5.2. Appraisal of the value of a feminist theological perspective as a liberating hermeneutic tool 169 5.2.1. The centre of theological reflection is 'human worth' 170 5.3. Conclusion: The visual theology that has been presented about Mary Magdalene through Christian art has not communicated a fair image 172 CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION 173 APPENDICES A: INDEX OF ARTWORKS DEPICTING MARY MAGDALENE 174 . B: EXTENDED LIST OF HISTORICAL TEXTUAL SOURCES 285 BIBLIOGRAPHY -- ...... 288 rl,,,,,-.-ff!"lll_'Q!l .... <af< M , "!Lt q:·7"';( ::- .~ ..... ~ 4 BllJLIOTE .... '/ .· I • ~":>!I.RY A~C~~s At;inwin ... 1111111111111111111111111 ~1111111111 01501911 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My thanks go to Prof. L.D.Hulley for his acceptance and guidance through this dissertation. Prof. Christina Landman for her enthusiasm and timely assistance. Prof. Marie Henry Keane for her constant encouragement and inspiration through a long journey of discovery. Jane for the hours of checking through my grammar, and to Sue, David, and Betsy for their patience and willingness to listen, discuss and read. IN ADDITION: The f1nanc1al assistance rendered by the Human Sc1ences Research council towards the cost of this research 1s hereby acknowledged. Op1n1ons expressed or conclusions arrived at are those of the author and are not to be regarded as those of the Human Science Research Council. vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (The unreferenced pictures have come from picture postcards and Catholic repository 'holy cards', which have been collected over the years). Frontispiece:Mary Magdalene detail from 'Noli me tangere' Giotto di Bondone [1267-1337] Church of S. Francesco, Assisi. (Eimerl 1973:frontispiece). 1. The Holy Trinity opposite page: 14 (c.1411) Andrei Rublev [c.1370-1430] Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. 2. Lilith 32 (c.1892) Kenyon Cox [1856-1919] (Dijkstra 1986:309). 3. "The fall of man" 32 (c.1508) Michelangelo Buonarroti [1475-1564] Sistine Chapel, Vatican. 4. The Salzburg Missal 36 (c.1481) Berthold Furtmeyr. 5. "Mary Magdalene supporting the body of Christ' 44 Anonymous Brussels artist c. 1500. Photograph courtesy of Musee de Cluny, Paris. 6. Mary Magdalene 83 Mathis Grunewald [ c.14 70 /80-1529] lsenheim altar, Kolmar. (Bruckberger 1953:138). 7. 'Noli me tangere' 92 (c.1512) Titian (Tiziano Vecellio) [d.1576] National Gallery, London. (Thomas 1979:127). 8. 'Noli me tangere' 95 viii (c.1290) Giotto di Sandone [1267-1337] Church of S. Francesco, Assisi. 9. Mystic crucifixion 95 (c.1501) Sandro Botticelli [c.1445-1510] (Wadia 1968:48). 10. "The Magdalene at the home of the Pharisee" 96 (c.1891) Jean Beraud [1849-1935] Musee d'Orsay, Paris. 11 . The Magdalene 97 Maestro di Palazzo Venezia [1400?] (Sienese Painting from 1300-1600 Monte dei Paschi 1953 pl xi iii). 12. Mary Magdalene (c.1451) 98 Stefan Lochner [c.1442-51]. 13. Mary Magdalene 98 Jan van Score! [ c.1495-1562] Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. (Warner 1985:pl 71). 14. Mary Magdalene 98 Moretto da Brescia [ c.1498-1554] Art Institute of Chicago. (Malvern 1975:138). 15. The Magdalene 99 Bernadina Luini [c.1512-1532] National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. (Malvern 1975:176). 16. Pieta 100 Moretto da Brescia [ c.1498-1554] National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C. (Malvern 1975:171). 17. Crucifixion 100 ix David Jones [1895-1974] Qhe Tablet 1985:13 April, frontispiece). 18. "Mary Magdalene receiving communion" 102 (c.1400) detail from the Altarpiece of the Apocalypse, Hamburg in Victoria & Albert Museum, London. (Warner 1985:pl 88). 19. "St Magdalene in ecstasy supported by two angels" 102 (c.1630) Simon Vouet [1590-1649] (Duperray 1988: frontispiece). 20. The Magdalene Altarpiece 103 Lucas Moser [ c.1431] in Pfarrkirche, Tiefenbronn. 21. The elevation of Mary Magdalene 103 (c.1490-92) The Munnerstadt altarpiece Nationalmuseum, Munich. (Das Munster 1987:326,heft 4). 22. The elevation of Mary Magdalene 103 (c.1290) Giotto di Bondone [1267-1337] Church of S. Francesco, Assisi. (Casa Editrice Francescana Assisi 1979. Giotto e i Giotteschi in Assisi.pl.XV). 23. Mary Magdalene 104 Quentin Massys (1464-1530) John G. Johnson Collection, Philadelphia. (Malvern 1975:78). 24. The elevation of the Magdalene 104 Albrecht Durer [1471-1528] (Duperray 1988:63). 25. St Mary Magdalene 104 The Sforza Book of Hours [late 1500] (Malvern 1975:97). x 26. "The beautiful sinner" 104 Gregor Erhart [d.1540] (Sele Arte 46, 1960:pl.3). 27. "The elevation of the Magdalene" 105 Raphael Schiamosi [c.1620-1670] (Duperray 1988:60). 28. St Mary Magdalene 105 (c.1450) Rogier van der Weyden [1399-1464] Louvre, Paris. (Courthion 1958:58). 29. Mary Magdalene 105 (c.1525) Lucas Cranach [1472-1553] (Das Munster 1987:235, heft 3). 30.