Mipam on Buddha-Nature : the Ground of the Nyingma Tradition / Douglas S
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Mipam on Buddha-Nature The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition D O U G L A S S. D U C K W O R T H MIPAM ON BUDDHA-NATURE MIPAM ON BUDDHA-NATURE The Ground of the Nyingma Tradition Douglas S. Duckworth STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PRESS Published by State University of New York Press, Albany © 2008 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. No part of this book may be stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means including electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior permission in writing of the publisher. For information, contact State University of New York Press, Albany, NY www.sunypress.edu Production by Ryan Morris Marketing by Michael Campochiaro Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Duckworth, Douglas S., 1971– Mipam on Buddha-nature : the ground of the Nyingma tradition / Douglas S. Duckworth. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7914-7521-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) 1. Mi-pham-rgya-mtsho, ’Jam-mgon ’Ju, 1846-1912. 2. Rñin-ma-pa (Sect)—Doctrines. 3. Madhyamika (Buddhism) 4. Bud- dhahood. I. Title. BQ972.I457D83 2008 294.3'420423—dc22 2007037662 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Preface ix Introduction xi Presence and Absence xii Historical Survey xvii Monastic Education and the Nonsectarian Movement xx Life and Works of Mipam xxiii Summary of Contents xxviii The End of the Beginning xxxii Chapter 1. Buddha-Nature and the Unity of the Two Truths 1 Introduction 1 Mipam’s Synthesis 4 Two Truths 6 Buddha-Nature as the Unity of Appearance and Emptiness 13 Buddha-Nature as the Definitive Meaning 20 Conclusion 26 Chapter 2. Middle Way of Prāsan˙gika and Yogācāra 27 Introduction 27 Svātantrika-Prāsan˙gika 28 v vi CONTENTS Dialectical Ascent 39 Foundations of Yogācāra 45 Prāsan˙gika versus Yogācāra 51 Conclusion 53 Chapter 3. The Present Absence 55 Introduction 55 Other-Emptiness in the Jonang 57 Other-Emptiness and the Nyingma: Lochen Dharmaśrī 66 Another Emptiness? Emptiness of Self/Other 71 Phenomena and Suchness 73 De/limiting Emptiness 81 Emptiness as the Unity of Appearance and Emptiness 85 Conclusion 91 Chapter 4. Buddha-Nature and the Ground of the Great Perfection 93 Introduction 93 Distinguishing the Views on Buddha-Nature 94 Buddha-Nature as Heritage, Buddha-Nature as the Ground 99 Appearance and Reality 107 Conclusion 114 Chapter 5. The Indivisible Ground and Fruition 117 Introduction 117 Establishing Buddha-Nature: The Immanent Buddha 118 Establishing Appearances as Divine 124 Buddha-Nature and a Difference Between Sūtra and Mantra 131 Conclusion 139 Conclusion 141 Contents vii Translations of Primary Texts 145 Appendix 1. Lion’s Roar: Exposition of Buddha-Nature 147 Stating Other Traditions 149 Presenting Our Authentic Tradition 153 The Meaning of the First Verse “Because the body of the perfect Buddha is radiant” 153 The Meaning of the Second Verse “Because thusness is indivisible” 159 The Meaning of the Third Verse “Because of possessing heritage” 162 Refuting the View that [the Basic Element] Is Truly Established and Not Empty 167 Refuting the View that [the Basic Element] Is a Void Emptiness 168 Refuting the Apprehension of [the Basic Element] as Impermanent and Conditioned 170 Appendix 2. Notes on the Essential Points of [Mipam’s] Exposition [of Buddha-Nature] 181 Notes 191 Bibliography 265 Index 281 PREFACE I have gathered here Mipam’s writings on Buddha-nature from a variety of sources to show the central role of Buddha-nature in his works. In doing so, I do not stray far from his texts and include many excerpted translations. In the notes and text, I use the Wylie system to transliterate Tibetan into Eng- lish. Also, I have adopted the THDL system of phonetic transcription devel- oped by David Germano and Nicolas Tournadre to render Tibetan into English (hence, “Mipam” not “Mipham”). When relevant, I include Sanskrit technical terms parenthetically with the Tibetan. As with all things, this book is the result of many causes and conditions. I would like to first express my deepest gratitude to Chökyi Nyima Rin- poché, and his late father, Tulku Urgyen, without whom I would not have had the inspiration to take on such a study as this. This book evolved out of my Ph.D. dissertation, entitled “Buddha-Nature and a Dialectic of Presence and Absence in the Works of Mi-pham” (University of Virginia, 2005); it would not have been possible without my peerless advisor, Professor Jeffrey Hopkins. I also owe a debt of gratitude to Professor David Germano, who has helped me over the years in many significant ways. Professors Hopkins and Germano have both consistently challenged me to deepen my under- standing of texts and traditions in critical and creative ways. Professors Karen Lang and Robert Hueckstedt also gave me invaluable feedback in the early stages of this project. My studies were made possible due to many learned Tibetan scholars, who I list in the order that I met them: the late Nyoshül Khenpo, Khenpo Orgyen Trinlé, the late Khenpo Jadrel, the late Khenpo Petsé, Khenpo Chöying Lhündrup, Khenpo Tupten Yeshé, Khenpo Yeshé ix x PREFACE Trinlé, Khenpo Sherap Özer, Khenpo Nyima Töndrup, Khenpo Namdröl, Khenpo Tsültrim Dargyé, Aku Rapgyé, the late Khenpo Yönten Zangpo, Khenpo Jampa Lodrö, Khenpo Sherap Zangpo, Khenpo Sherap Dorjé, Khenpo Pema Sherap, Khenpo Kātyāyana, Khenpo Wangchuk Sönam, Khenpo Apé, Trülku Nyima Gyeltsen, Khenpo Tsülnam, and last but not least, Khenpo Tsültrim Lodrö. All these teachers, and others not mentioned, shared their wisdom with great kindness. My interest in the academic study of Buddha-nature was sparked by my undergraduate professor, Sallie King, whom I would like to thank as a teacher, friend, and mentor. I am also grateful to Fulbright-Hays for provid- ing me with a fellowship to do research in Nepal and India. Also, a summer stipend from the National Endowment for the Humanities helped me to bring this project to completion. I owe a special thanks to Professor John Dunne, who tutored me in Tibetan when I was first traveling in India after college. I would also like to thank Nawang Thokmey, a South Asian librar- ian at the University of Virginia, for helping me locate Tibetan texts, and Gene Smith, who introduced me to Jonang teachers and texts. I wish to express my gratitude to all my other teachers, colleagues, friends, and family who have given me guidance over the years. In particular, communications with Thomas Doctor, Adam Pearcy, and Karma Phuntsho have helped my understanding of Mipam. Also, Cortland Dahl, David Duckworth, James Gentry, Charlie Orzech, Jimmy Pittard, Amanda Porter- field, and Jann Ronis have given me valuable feedback on this work. This book is dedicated to my family, and to anyone whose hair stands on end upon hearing about emptiness. INTRODUCTION This book addresses the relationship between presence and absence (empti- ness) in Buddhist thought. It focuses on the Nyingma (rnying ma) tradition of Tibet as articulated in the works of Mipam (’ju mi pham rgya mtsho, 1846–1912), a great synthesizer of Buddhist doctrine and Nyingma philoso- phy. Mipam incorporates an extraordinarily wide range of discourses into his grand, systematic interpretation of Buddhist doctrine. I draw widely from his writings on the Middle Way (dbu ma, madhyamaka), epistemology (tshad ma, pramān.a), and tantra to discuss the significance of an ontological “ground” (gzhi), or Buddha-nature, as the central theme in his overall inter- pretative scheme. I present Mipam’s view across a range of topics to under- score Buddha-nature and a dialectic of presence and absence as a central thread that runs through his interpretative system. The presence of Buddha-nature as intrinsic within the ground of exis- tence is a predominant feature of the discourses of tantra in the Nyingma tradition of Tibet, and in particular, the Great Perfection (rdzogs chen). The Great Perfection is a textual and meditative tradition that affirms the nature of mind as the Buddha, and offers a radically direct approach to actualizing this reality. The view of the Great Perfection consistently evades systematic analysis and in a fundamental way is antithetical to abstract conceptual determination. While Mipam did not write extensively on the Great Perfection as an isolated topic, he elucidates the view of the Great Perfection in his exoteric writings by creatively formulating the esoteric discourses that have defined the Nyingma tradition—namely, the Great Perfection—in terms of central exoteric discourses of monastic Buddhism: Buddha-nature, the Middle Way, and Buddhist epistemological systems. xi xii MIPAM ON BUDDHA-NATURE He skillfully incorporates esoteric discourses of Mantra (sngags) character- istic of his Nyingma predecessors into his commentaries on Indian śāstras. Buddhist epistemology, a system that delineates the authentic means of knowing reality, plays an important role in Mipam’s exegesis across both domains of esoteric and exoteric doctrines. Mipam integrates aspects of the Buddhist epistemological tradition with a view of Mantra, and associates the view of the Great Perfection with Prāsan˙gika-Madhyamaka. The Great Per- fection is the Nyingma tradition’s highest esoteric teaching and Prāsan˙gika- Madhyamaka is the philosophy commonly accepted in Tibet as the highest exoteric view. By integrating the esoteric teachings of Nyingma tantra with Buddhist epistemology and Prāsan˙gika-Madhyamaka, Mipam affirms the Nyingma as not only a tradition of tantric exegesis and ritual practice, but also as grounded within the rigorous intellectual traditions of Buddhist exo- teric philosophy. While discussing Mipam’s treatment of Buddha-nature, or the ground, across a number of issues in his works, we will address in detail his represen- tation of affirmation and negation.