DOCSLIB.ORG

Pensions Sub-Committee Thursday, 05 May 2016 at 10:30 County Hall, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pensions Sub-Committee Thursday, 05 May 2016 at 10:30 County Hall, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP Pensions Sub-Committee Thursday, 05 May 2016 at 10:30 County Hall, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP AGENDA 1 Minutes of the last meeting held on 4 February 16 5 - 8 2 Apologies for Absence 3 Declarations of Interests by Members and Officers:- (see note below) (a) Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (b) Private Interests (pecuniary and non-pecuniary) 4 Local Government pensions Scheme (LGPS) Website Design 9 - 10 update 5 LGPS Year End Process Update 11 - 12 6 Local Authority Pensions Fund Forum Business Meeting 13 - 54 7 Proxy Voting 55 - 168 8 LGPS Asset Pooling 169 - 182 9 Working Party Recommendations 183 - 186 Page 1 of 186 10 EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC The Committee will be invited to resolve:- 1. “That the public be excluded for the remainder of the meeting on the grounds that the discussions are likely to involve disclosure of exempt information described in paragraph 3 of the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) Order 2006 and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.” Note If this is agreed, the public will have to leave the meeting during consideration of the following exempt items. 11 Exempt appendix Asset Pooling and Consultation on Revised Investment Regulations 12 Working Party Exempt appendix and report of the Independent Advisor Notes (1) Councillors are advised to contact their Research Officer for details of any Group Meetings which are planned for this meeting. (2) Members of the public wishing to inspect "Background Papers" referred to in the reports on the agenda or Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act should contact:- Customer Services Centre 0300 500 80 80 (3) Persons making a declaration of interest should have regard to the Code of Conduct and the Council’s Procedure Rules. Those declaring must indicate the nature of their interest and the reasons for the declaration. Councillors or Officers requiring clarification on whether to make a declaration of interest are invited to contact David Forster (Tel. 0115 977 3552) or a colleague in Democratic Services prior to the meeting. (4) Councillors are reminded that Committee and Sub-Committee papers, with the exception of those which contain Exempt or Confidential Information, may be recycled. Page 2 of 186 (5) This agenda and its associated reports are available to view online via an online calendar - http://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/dms/Meetings.aspx Page 3 of 186 Page 4 of 186 minutes Meeting PENSIONS SUB COMMITTEE Date Thursday 4 February 2016 at 10.30 am membership Persons absent are marked with `A’ COUNCILLORS Reg Adair (Chairman) Mike Pringle (Vice Chairman) Chris Barnfather Sheila Place A Ian Campbell Ken Rigby Mrs Kay Cutts Parry Tsimbiridis John Wilkinson Nottingham City Council Councillor Alan Clark A Councillor Nick McDonald A Councillor Anne Peach Nottinghamshire Local Authorities’ Association Councillor Richard Jackson – Broxtowe Borough Council Kate Allsop – Executive Mayor Mansfield District Council Trades Unions Mr A Woodward Mr C King Scheduled Bodies Mrs Sue Reader Pensioners A Mr S Haggerty Mr T Needham Independent Advisor Mr William Bourne Page 5 of 186 1 Officers in Attendance Nigel Stevenson (Service Director – Finance Procurement and Improvement) Simon Cunnington (Resources) David Forster (Resources) Neil Robinson (Resources) Ciaran Guilfoyle (Resources) Andy Durrant (Resources) MINUTES The minutes of the last meeting of the Sub-Committee held on 5 November2015, having been previously circulated, were confirmed and signed by the Chairman. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from City Councillors Alan Clark and Nick McDonald Alan Woodward (Union Rep) William Bourne (Independent Advisor) DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS None. LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSION SCHEME – ANNUAL BENEFIT STATEMENT S Stevenson introduced the report and highlighted that there are some issue that the Pensions Regulator is investigating around the annual return for 2013/14 and 14/15. On a motion by the Chairman seconded by the Vice Chairman it was:- RESOLVED 2015/030 That the report be noted and that an update report be presented to the next meeting of the Pensions Sub-Committee with regard to the Pensions Regulators investigations. PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2014/15 PRESENTATION Members welcomed Karen Thurmble to the meeting. She gave a slide presentation with regard to the performance of the Nottinghamshire Pensions Fund for the performance to the end of March 2015. She highlighted the following points Page 6 of 186 2 The LGPS is performing very well however having cash somewhat reduces the returns that can be gained. The benchmarks set are skewed because of the weighting to US markets although the funds are reaching their 6% targets. There may need to be a reassessment of the Internal Multi Asset portfolio. Members thanked Karen Thurmble for her presentation. RESOLVED 2015/030 That the presentation and content be noted. LOCAL AUTHORITY PENSION FUND FORUM PRESENTATION Members welcomed Councillor Kieran Quinn Leader of Tameside and Chair of LAPFF. He gave a slide presentation on the work of the LAPFF and Shareholder engagement and highlighted the following It is about engaging companies to ensure the best results achievable e.g. through adhering to high standards of corporate behaviour and returns are sustainable. LAPFF also look towards Carbon risk and Strategic resilience resolutions – so companies look to have a low-carbon business strategy Company Diversity and encouraging a wide range of views is critical. Shareholder Engagement Accountability LGPS Investment Regulations Reform Members thanked Councillor Quinn for the presentation. RESOLVED 2015/031 That the presentation and content be noted. LOCAL AUTHORITY PENSION FUND FORUM BUSINESS MEETING RESOLVED 2015/032 That the report be noted. PROXY VOTING RESOLVED: 2015/033 That the report on Proxy Voting be noted Page 7 of 186 3 LGC INVESTMENT SUMMIT 2015 RESOLVED: 2015/034 1. That the attendance at key conferences be note as part of the Fund’s commitment to ensuring those charged with decision making and financial management have effective knowledge and skills. 2. That the report be noted. PROPERTY INSPECTION 2015 RESOLVED: 2015/035 That the property Inspections Tour be noted and that they are considered important part of the Funds fiduciary duties The meeting concluded at 12.20 pm CHAIRMAN Page 8 of 186 4 Report to Pensions Sub-Committee 5th May 2016 Agenda Item: xx REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR – HUMAN RESOURCES & CUSTOMER SERVICE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PENSION SCHEME – LGPS Website update 1. Purpose of the Report 1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the Pensions Sub-Committee of the work that is in progress to review and redesign the Nottinghamshire Pension Fund website. 2. Information and Advice 2.1 Members will be aware that as part of the administration of the pension fund good communication is essential in informing members and employers of the fund of developments relating to governance, changes to regulations and providing access to services. 2.2 The original website was established in 2006 and has been updated as pension regulations have changed. However to take the administration of pensions forward and to reach out to all members it is essential that the website is redesigned to provide increased functionality to pensioners, members of the scheme and employers. 2.3 There are many benefits to redesigning the website. A key benefit is providing members with restricted access to their own pension record enabling them through secure access to update certain personal details such as their address, complete on line forms and against certain criteria simulate a pension’s estimate, thus reducing the direct administration contact to more priority cases, and therefore reducing overall administration costs. It is also important to have a website that meets modern website design criteria, accessible via multiple devices, that will encourage members and pensioners to use the site, making it easy to find the information that they need to answer their questions. The website must also give a good impression in order to provide confidence in the content along with longevity, to enable future developments to be designed to improve the service and the customer experience. 2.4 It is envisaged that the first stage of the redesigned website will be completed and ready for go live in May 2016. 2.5 The second stage of the website development will link to the launch of a portal for members and employers. The portal will integrate into the pension’s administration system and will enable employers to have direct access into their member’s records to enable records to be Page 9 of 186 1 updated by the employer as part of their responsibilities in the LGPS. The members’ portal will also be the main route by which annual benefit statements are distributed. It is envisaged that the members’ portal will go live in August 2017 to support the distribution of statements. 2.6 As part of the build and roll-out it is important to ensure that the website meets the requirements of employers and pensioners a number of stake-holder groups are being arranged to test the website performance, and content. 2.7 A demonstration of the prototype website will be presented at Pensions Sub Committee. 3. Statutory and Policy Implications 3.1 This report has been compiled after consideration of implications in respect of finance, equal opportunities, human resources, crime and disorder, human rights, the safeguarding of children, sustainability and the environment and those using the service and where such implications are material they are described below. Appropriate consultation has been undertaken and advice sought on these issues as required. 4. Recommendation 4.1 It is recommended that the Pensions Sub-Committee note the contents of the report. MARJORIE TOWARD SERVICE DIRECTOR - CUSTOMERS & HR For any enquiries about this report please contact: Jonarthan Clewes, Pensions Manager, Business Support Centre on 0115 9773434 or [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Questions for Full Council
    Accepted / Date Question to Question Reason Rejected 05/03/2019 Mayor Can the Mayor confirm if she thinks 2 hours free parking will increase footfall within Mansfield Town Accepted centre? Mayor Do you think putting some council services such as a cash office, housing and homelessness officers, Accepted front desk customer enquiries in to our Town Hall on Mansfield Market Place would make council services more accessible and increase footfall in our town centre? Mayor Mansfield is the only authority in the County that has an Executive Mayor instead of a council leader. In Accepted the other Nottinghamshire Local Authorities the average allowance for the council leaders is just over £19,000 p.a. How does the current Mayor justify the £60,000 a year she currently receives? 21/05/2019 Mayor "Many congratulations to the Mayor on winning the election. During the campaign, many residents Withdrawn complained about the cost of the position of the Mayor. In response, I suggested to cut the mayoral allowance by about two thirds. You then offered to take a pay cut of about a third. I think that this is a positive compromise. I wonder if the Mayor would consider another compromise whereby the allowances and expenses of all the elected representatives in Mansfield are brought down to levels that are more consistent with other districts in Nottinghamshire, so that more money can be invested in our community?" 16/07/2019 Mayor A sum of public money in the region of £500,000 is required annually for the next four years amounting Accepted to £2,000,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Morrison: Essential Public Affairs for Journalists 6E
    Morrison: Essential Public Affairs for Journalists 6e CHAPTER 1: THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION AND MONARCHY TABLE 1A MAIN ENTITLEMENTS LISTED IN BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 Freedoms for all ‘Englishmen’ Sanctions for Roman Catholics Freedom from royal interference with the law— Ban on Catholics succeeding to English throne— sovereigns forbidden from establishing their own reflecting the supposed fact that ‘it hath been found courts, or acting as judge themselves by experience that it is inconsistent with the safety and welfare of this protestant kingdom to be governed by a papist prince’ Freedom from being taxed without Parliament’s Obligation on newly crowned sovereigns to swear agreement oaths of allegiance to Church of England Freedom to petition reigning monarch Freedom for Protestants only to possess ‘arms for Bar on carrying weapons defence’ Freedom from drafting into peacetime army without Parliament’s consent Freedom to elect MPs without sovereign’s interference Freedom from cruel and unusual punishments and excessive bail Freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial TABLE 1B RULES GOVERNING MONARCHICAL SUCCESSION IN THE ACT OF SETTLEMENT 1701 Details Protestants only The Crown should pass to Protestant descendants of Electress Sophie of Hanover (first cousin once removed of Queen Anne, who inherited throne after deaths of Mary and William) No marriages to Catholics Monarchs ‘shall join in communion’ with Church of England and not marry Roman Catholics England for the English If anyone not native to England inherits throne, the country will not wage war for ‘any dominions or territories which do not belong to the Crown of England without the consent of Parliament’ Loyalty from the Crown No monarch may leave ‘British Isles’ without Parliament’s consent (repealed by George I in 1716) Openness before Parliament All government matters within Privy Council’s jurisdiction (see p.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Governs Britain - Democracy in Action? Directly Elected Mayors in England Susan Finding
    Who governs Britain - Democracy in action? Directly Elected Mayors in England Susan Finding To cite this version: Susan Finding. Who governs Britain - Democracy in action? Directly Elected Mayors in England. Mé- moire(s), identité(s), marginalité(s) dans le monde occidental contemporain. Cahiers du MIMMOC, Université de Poitiers ; MIMMOC, 2015, Who Governs in the Americas and in Europe?, 10.4000/mim- moc.2288. hal-02023205 HAL Id: hal-02023205 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02023205 Submitted on 12 Jul 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Mémoire(s), identité(s), marginalité(s) dans le monde occidental contemporain Cahiers du MIMMOC 14 | 2015 Who Governs in the Americas and in Europe? Who governs Britain - Democracy in action? Directly Elected Mayors in England Susan FINDING Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/mimmoc/2288 DOI: 10.4000/mimmoc.2288 ISSN: 1951-6789 Publisher Université de Poitiers Brought to you by Université de Poitiers Electronic reference Susan FINDING, “Who governs Britain - Democracy in action? Directly Elected Mayors in England”, Mémoire(s), identité(s), marginalité(s) dans le monde occidental contemporain [Online], 14 | 2015, Online since 28 August 2015, connection on 21 June 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Police and Crime Panels
    NOTTINGHAMSHIRE POLICE AND CRIME PANEL 15 JUNE 2015 8 REVIEW OF MEMBERSHIP – BALANCED APPOINTMENT OBJECTIVE Purpose of the Report 1. To consider the Panel’s membership and any changes required to meet the balanced appointment objective as required by legislation. Information and Advice 2. The Police and Social Responsibility Act 2011 specifies that Police and Crime Panels must represent all parts of the police force area, be politically balanced and that members should have the skills, knowledge and experience necessary. 3. The Panel needs to review its membership at its Annual Meeting in June (or following elections which may have affected the Panel’s political balance). Elected members and proportional representation 4. The recent local elections have seen some changes in control and the overall numbers of seats held by the various political groups across the County (there has also been a reduction in seats due to boundary reviews completed for some of the District Councils). 5. Legislation stipulates that Police and Crime Panels must represent all parts of the relevant area, be politically balanced and have a membership that has the necessary skills, knowledge and experience. 6. Following the establishment of the Police and Crime Panel in 2012 the City Council agreed to offer one of its two additional co-opted places to a Conservative Member to help achieve overall political balance across the City and County. The Panel also agreed to offer the County Council Liberal Democrat Group a co-opted place on the Panel to ensure overall political balance. 7. Similarly, following the elections in May 2013, the Panel also agreed to offer the County Council’s Conservative Group a co-opted place to maintain overall political balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire Police and Crime Panel
    NOTTINGHAMSHIRE POLICE AND CRIME PANEL Monday, 15 June 2015 at 14:00 County Hall , There will be a pre-meeting for Panel Members only in The Civic Suite at 1.00pm AGENDA 1 Election of Chairman 2 Election of Vice -Chairman 3 Minutes of last meeting held on 20 April 2015 5 - 12 4 Apologies for Absence 5 Declarations of Interests by Members and Officers: - (see note below) (a) Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (b) Private Interests (pecuniary and non-pecuniary) 6 Rules of Procedure 13 - 22 7 Work Programme 23 - 28 8 Review of Membership - Balanced Appointment Objective 29 - 32 9 Police and Crime Plan 12 Month Monitoring Report and 33 - 128 Commissioner's Annual Report 2014-15 Page 1 of 136 10 Police and Crime Plan Strategic Priority Theme 5 - Reduce the 129 - Threat from Organised Crime 136 Notes (a) Members of the public are welcome to attend to observe meetings of the Police and Crime Panel. Please note that there is no opportunity for the public to speak at these meetings. (b) Nominations for the position of Chair/ Vice-Chair for the 2015/16 municipal year will be requested at the meeting. Nominations will need to be seconded. In the event of more than one nomination being received, voting will take place by a show of hands. (c) Declarations of Interests – Persons making a declaration of interest should have regard to their own Council’s Code of Conduct and the Panel’s Procedural Rules. Members or Officers requiring clarification on whether to make a declaration of interest are invited to contact Keith Ford (Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Local Government Work for Women? Interim Report of the Local Government Commission April 2017
    Does Local Government Work for Women? Interim Report of the Local Government Commission April 2017 Town Hall Andrew Bazeley – Fawcett Society Jennifer Glover – LGiU Lauren Lucas – LGiU Nan Sloane – Centre for Women and Democracy Polly Trenow Design by Sian at D. R. ink, www.d-r-ink.com © The Fawcett Society 2017 Contents Executive summary 4 About us 11 Acknowledgements 11 Commissioners 12 The Commission 13 Methodology 14 Part 1: Data on Women’s Representation in Local Government 15 Women Councillors and Candidates in England 15 Women Councillors and Candidates in Wales 21 Women in Leadership 23 Part 2: Survey of Councillors 29 How Representative is Local Government? 29 Why Do Women Stand, and What Impact Do They Have? 32 What Barriers do Women Councillors Face? 33 What Solutions Do Women Councillors Want To See? 37 Conclusions and Next Steps 40 Appendix 1: Councils in England and Wales 42 Appendix 2: Councillor Counting Additional Tables (England) 43 Appendix 3: Women Councillors in English Local Authorities 46 Appendix 4: Women Councillors on Welsh Local Authorities 52 Appendix 5: Independent Councillors in Welsh Local Authorities 52 Appendix 6: Experience Of Councillors In Local Government Survey 53 www.fawcettsociety.org.uk | Does Local Government Work for Women? | April 2017 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Only a third of councillors in England are women. Our analysis reveals that this figure has scarcely changed over the last two decades. Even fewer women progress to lead their councils. Councils do not reflect the diversity of our society, and disabled and ethnic minority women experience multiple discrimination. New survey data reveals that within this male-dominated environment, sexism is worryingly commonplace in the council chamber and local parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Questionnaire (5MB)
    BES 2014-2023 Waves 1-16 Questionnaire British Election Study 2014-2023 Combined Waves 1-16 Internet Panel Codebook University of Manchester { University of Oxford 1 BES 2014-2023 Waves 1-16 Questionnaire Introduction The British Election Study 2019-2023 is managed via a consortium of the University of Manchester and the University of Oxford. The Scientific Leadership Team is comprised of Professor Ed Fieldhouse, Professor Jane Green, Professor Geoff Evans, Dr Jonathan Mellon and Dr Christopher Prosser. The team is supported by Dr Roosmarijn de Geus. The previous 2014-2019 British Election Study team was also led by Professor Hermann Schmitt and Professor Cees van der Eijk. Wave 1 30,590 respondents took wave 1. Wave 1 was conducted by YouGov between 20th February 2014 and 9th March 2014. Wave 2 30,219 respondents took wave 2, 26,870 of these also took wave 1. The overall wave on wave retention was 88.9%. Wave 2 was conducted by YouGov between 22nd May 2014 and 25th June 2014. Wave 3 27,839 respondents took wave 3 of the British Election Study, 24,016 of these also took wave 2. The overall wave on wave retention was 79.4%. In total there are 21,471 respondents who took all of the first three waves of the survey, 71.0% of the respondents who originally took wave 1. Wave 3 was conducted by YouGov between 19th September 2014 and 17th October 2014. Wave 4 31,328 respondents took wave 4 of the British Election Study. 23,542 of these also took wave 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Template
    NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF NOTTINGHAM AND NOTTINGHAMSHIRE ECONOMIC PROSPERITY COMMITTEE MINUTES of the meeting held at Ashfield District Council, Council Offices, Urban Road, Kirkby in Ashfield, NG17 8DA on 4 February 2019 from 9.32 am - 10.43 am Present Councillor Jon Collins (Chair) - Nottingham City Council Councillor Jason Zadrozny (Vice Chair) - Ashfield District Council Mayor Kate Allsop - Mansfield District Council (for item 6 onwards) Councillor John Clarke - Gedling Borough Council Councillor Mrs Kay Cutts MBE - Nottinghamshire County Council Councillor Richard Jackson - Broxtowe Borough Council Councillor David J Lloyd - Newark and Sherwood District Council Councillor Simon Robinson - Rushcliffe Borough Council Councillor Jo White – Bassetlaw District Council Absent Councillor Simon Greaves (Bassetlaw District Council), Substituted by Councillor Jo White Colleagues, partners and others in attendance: Nancy Barnard - Nottingham City Council Hayley Barsby - Mansfield District Council Karen Bradford - Gedling Borough Council Ruth Hyde - Broxtowe Borough Council Nicki Jenkins - Nottingham City Council Katherine Marriott - Rushcliffe Borough Council Anthony May - Nottinghamshire County Council Robert Mitchell - Ashfield District Council John Robinson - Newark and Sherwood District Council Neil Taylor - Bassetlaw District Council Call-in None of the items on the agenda are subject to call-in. 10 WELCOME AND APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE The Chair welcomed Committee Members and colleagues and thanked Ashfield District Council for hosting the meeting. 11 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST None. 1 The City of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Economic Prosperity Committee - 4.02.19 12 MINUTES The minutes of the meeting held on 27 November 2018 were agreed as a correct record and were signed by the Chair. 13 N2 INNOVATION SEMINAR Kath Marriott, Deputy Chief Executive, Rushcliffe Borough Council introduced her report which outlined events at the N2 Innovation Seminar, held on 12 November 2018, and proposed the next steps to take forward the outcomes and learning from the day.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Brexit at the Local Level
    PASXXX10.1177/0032329221992198Politics & SocietyGartzou-Katsouyanni et al. 992198research-article2021 Article Politics & Society 1 –41 Voting for Your Pocketbook, © The Author(s) 2021 but against Your Pocketbook? Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions A Study of Brexit at the Local https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329221992198DOI: 10.1177/0032329221992198 Level journals.sagepub.com/home/pas Kira Gartzou-Katsouyanni, Max Kiefel, and Jose Javier Olivas Osuna London School of Economics Abstract In explaining the outcome of the 2016 EU referendum in the United Kingdom, can theories emphasizing the importance of economic factors be reconciled with the fact that many people appeared to vote against their economic self-interest? This article approaches this puzzle through case study research that draws on fieldwork and a process of reciprocal knowledge exchange with local communities in five local authorities in England and Wales. It argues that the Leave vote can be attributed partly to political discontent associated with trajectories of relative economic decline and deindustrialization. Building on the growing literature about the role of narratives and discourses in navigating uncertainty, it contends that these localized economic experiences, interpreted through local-level narratives, paved the way for local-level discourses of resilience and nationwide optimistic messaging about the economic impacts of Brexit to resonate. Local and national-level discourses discounting the potential economic costs of leaving the European Union played a crucial role in giving precise, somewhat paradoxical, political content to the sense of discontent. The article contributes to the growing focus on place and community in understanding political behavior and invites further research on local discourses linking macro-level trajectories and micro-level voting decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Board Meeting 1.00Pm, Monday 22Nd June 2015 Kilpin Room, Nottingham Conference Centre AGENDA 1. Apologies 2. Declarati
    Executive Board Meeting 1.00pm, Monday 22nd June 2015 Kilpin Room, Nottingham Conference Centre AGENDA 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Minutes of the Executive Board Meeting 20th March 2015 Items for decision: 4. Implications of Local and General Election Results 5. High Speed 2 6. Future Infrastructure Priorities & Midlands Connect 7. Review into Housing Items for information: 8. Report of Management Group 9. Regional Employer’s Board 10. Regional Improvement and Transformation Board 11. Regional Migration Board 12. Any Other Business ATTENDANCE SHEET Member 13.06.14 19.09.14 05.12.14 20.03.15 Nottingham City Council Cllr Jon Collins - Chair Lincolnshire County Council Cllr Martin Hill OBE - V Chair X Substitute sent Rushcliffe Borough Council Cllr Neil Clarke MBE - V Chair Substitute sent Northamptonshire County Council Cllr Jim Harker OBE X Substitute sent Substitute sent X South Kesteven District Council Cllr Linda Neal X Derbyshire County Council Cllr Anne Western X Blaby District Council Cllr David Slater X X Derby City Council Cllr Paul Bayliss X Derby City Council Cllr Ranjit Banwait X X X Nottinghamshire County Council Cllr Alan Rhodes X X X Derbyshire Dales District Council Cllr Lewis Rose OBE X X X Leicester City Council Cllr Rory Palmer X X X X Rutland County Council Cllr Roger Begy OBE X Daventry District Council Cllr Chris Millar Leicestershire County Council Cllr Nicholas Rushton X Vice Chairs EMC Lincolnshire County Council Cllr Robert Parker X East Lindsey District Council Cllr
    [Show full text]
  • Management Group Meeting 10.00Am, Friday 25Th May 2018
    Management Group Meeting 10.00am, Friday 25th May 2018 Pera Business Park, Melton Mowbray AGENDA 1. Apologies 2. Declarations of Interest 3. Minutes of meeting held on 16th March 2018 * 4. Matters Arising 5. Political Advice and Leadership * (Cllr Martin Hill) 6. Budgets and Financial Control * . Budget Monitoring 2018/19 (Cllr Jon Collins) 7. Performance Management * (Cllr Anne Western) 8. Corporate Governance * (Cllr Chris Millar) 9. Conduct and Standards * (Mayor Kate Allsop) 10. Executive Board (15th June 2018) * Papers attached Item 3 EAST MIDLANDS COUNCILS MANAGEMENT GROUP MEETING MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 16TH MARCH 2018 Present: Cllr Jon Collins – Nottingham City Council Cllr Martin Hill - Lincolnshire County Council Cllr Chris Millar – Daventry District Council Mayor Kate Allsop – Mansfield District Council Cllr Anne Western – Derbyshire County Council Stuart Young - East Midlands Councils Steve Charlesworth - East Midlands Councils Lisa Hopkins – East Midlands Councils Apologies: Cllr David Bill – Hinckley & Bosworth Borough Council Cllr Roger Blaney – Newark & Sherwood District Council ACTION 1. Apologies 1.1 Apologies were received from Cllr David Bill and Cllr Roger Blaney. 2. Declarations of Interest 2.1 None. 3. Minutes of the meeting held on 24th November 2017 3.1 These were confirmed as a true and accurate record. 4. Matters Arising 4.1 No additional matters arising outside of agenda and reports. 4.2 Steve Charlesworth reported he has received a response from Nottingham City Council in relation to pension differences in the accounts and financial system. Steve to confirm with Nottingham City Council the balance in the financial SC system is the correct one which should be transferred over should this ever be necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Declaration District Elections
    Mansfield District Council Election of a District Councillor for the Abbott Ward DECLARATION OF RESULT OF POLL I, the Undersigned, being the Returning Officer at the election held on Thursday 5 th May 2011 , DO HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the number of votes cast for each candidate at the election is as follows: Name s of Candidate s Votes Recorded (E): Elected ADEY, SHARRON The Labour Party Candidate 418 (E) ELLIS, ANNA MARIE Known as Anna Marie Ellis 56 Liberal Democrats MCCROSSAN, DANIEL JOSEPH Known as Danny McCrossan 394 Mansfield Indpendent Forum STEVENS, RICHARD MAURICE Known as Richard Stevens 149 The Conservative party Candidate The Number of Ballot Papers Rejected was as follows: (a) Want of Official Mark 0 (b) Voting for more candidates than the voter was entitled to 5 (c) Writing or mark by which the voter could be identified 0 (d) Being unmarked or wholly void for uncertainty 7 (e) Rejected in part 0 Total spoilt votes 12 And I hereby declare that Sharron Adey has been duly elected. Turnout: 46.04% Ruth Marlow Returning Officer Mansfield District Council Civic Centre Chesterfield Road South Mansfield Nottinghamshire NG19 7BH Published and printed by Ruth Marlow, Returning Officer, Mansfield District Council, Civic Centre, Chesterfield Road South, Mansfield, Nottinghamshire, NG19 7BH Mansfield District Council Election of a District Councillor for the Berry Hill Ward DECLARATION OF RESULT OF POLL I, the Undersigned, being the Returning Officer at the election held on Thursday 5 th May 2011 , DO HEREBY GIVE NOTICE that the number
    [Show full text]