DOCSLIB.ORG

California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD LOS ANGELES REGION 320 West 4th Street, Suite 200, Los Angeles, California 90013 (213) 576-6600 Fax (213) 576-6640 http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/losangeles/ ORDER R4-2017-0124 NPDES NO. CA0056014 WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TAPIA WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY The following Discharger is subject to waste discharge requirements (WDRs) set forth in this Order: Table 1. Discharger Information Discharger/Permittee Las Virgenes Municipal Water District (LVMWD, Permittee, or Discharger) Tapia Water Reclamation Facility (Tapia WRF or Facility) and its associated Name of Facility wastewater collection system and outfalls 731 Malibu Canyon Road Facility Address Calabasas, CA 91302 Los Angeles County Table 2. Discharge Location Discharge Effluent Discharge Point Discharge Point Receiving Water Point Description Latitude (North) Longitude (West) Tertiary Treated 001 34.081459o N 118.706471o W Malibu Creek Effluent Tertiary Treated Las Virgenes Creek 002 34.137032o N 118.704796o W Effluent (tributary to Malibu Creek) Tertiary Treated 003 34.078177o N 118.701709o W Malibu Creek Effluent Arroyo Calabasas Creek Tertiary Treated 005 34.150750o N 118.648719o W (tributary to Los Angeles Effluent River) Table 3. Administrative Information This Order was adopted on: June 01, 2017 This Order shall become effective on: August 01, 2017 This Order shall expire on: July 31, 2022 The Discharger shall file a Report of Waste Discharge as an application for reissuance of WDRs in accordance with title 23, California Code of Regulations, 180 days prior to the and an application for reissuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Order expiration date System (NPDES) permit no later than: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region have Major classified this discharge as follows: Adopted 06/01/17 LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ORDER R4-2017-0124 TAPIA WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY NPDES NO. CA0056014 CONTENTS I. Facility Information ........................................................................................................................ 5 II. Findings ........................................................................................................................................ 5 III. Discharge Prohibitions .................................................................................................................. 5 IV. Discharge Prohibition For Malibu Creek ........................................................................................ 6 V. Discharge Prohibition Exemption For Malibu Creek ...................................................................... 7 VI. Effluent Limitations and Discharge Specifications ......................................................................... 8 A. Effluent Limitations – Discharge Point 001, 002, 003, and 005 .............................................. 8 1. Final Effluent Limitations – Discharge Point 001, 002, 003, and 005 .................................. 8 2. Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharge Points 001, 002, and 003 – Malibu Creek ... 11 3. Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharge Point 005 – Los Angeles River .................... 13 4. Interim Effluent Limitations .............................................................................................. 15 B. Land Discharge Specifications – Not Applicable .................................................................. 15 C. Recycling Specifications – Not Applicable ............................................................................ 15 VII. Receiving Water Limitations ........................................................................................................ 16 A. Surface Water Limitations .................................................................................................... 16 B. Groundwater Limitations ...................................................................................................... 17 VIII. Provisions ................................................................................................................................... 18 A. Standard Provisions ............................................................................................................. 18 B. Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) Requirements .................................................... 20 C. Special Provisions................................................................................................................ 21 1. Reopener Provisions ....................................................................................................... 21 2. Special Studies, Technical Reports and Additional Monitoring Requirements .................. 22 3. Best Management Practices and Pollution Prevention ..................................................... 23 4. Construction, Operation and Maintenance Specifications ................................................ 24 5. Special Provisions for Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) ................................. 24 6. Spill Reporting Requirements .......................................................................................... 25 7. Compliance Schedule for Nutrients in Malibu Creek ........................................................ 29 IX. Compliance Determination .......................................................................................................... 31 TABLES Table 1. Discharger Information ............................................................................................................. 1 Table 2. Discharge Location .................................................................................................................. 1 Table 3. Administrative Information ........................................................................................................ 1 Table 4. Final Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharge Points 001, 002, 003, and 005 .................... 9 Table 5. Final Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharge Points 001, 002, and 003 .......................... 11 Table 6. Final Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharge Point 005 .................................................. 13 Table 7. Interim Final Effluent Limitations Applicable to Discharge Points 001, 002, and 003 .............. 15 Table 8. Compliance Schedule and Milestone Dates ........................................................................... 30 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – Definitions .................................................................................................................. A-1 Attachment B – Las Virgenes-Triunfo Joint Powers Authority Service Area ........................................ B-1 Attachment C – Tapia WRF Flow Schematic ......................................................................................C-1 Attachment D – Standard Provisions ..................................................................................................D-1 Attachment E – Monitoring and Reporting Program ............................................................................ E-1 Attachment F – Fact Sheet ................................................................................................................. F-1 Attachment G – Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) Work Plan ....................................................... G-1 Attachment H – Pretreatment Reporting Requirements ......................................................................H-1 Attachment I – Biosolids Use And Disposal Requirements .................................................................. I-1 Attachment J – Reporting Requirements For Rain Event Of Less Than 0.4 Inches In 24 Hours ......... J-1 Adopted 06/01/17 3 LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ORDER R4-2017-0124 TAPIA WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY NPDES NO. CA0056014 FIGURES Figure E-1. Tapia WRF Malibu Creek Receiving Water Stations ......................................................... E-7 Figure E-2. Tapia WRF Los Angeles River Receiving Water Stations ................................................. E-8 Figure F-1. Copper Performance Data .............................................................................................. F-60 Adopted 06/01/17 4 LAS VIRGENES MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT ORDER R4-2017-0124 TAPIA WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY NPDES NO. CA0056014 I. FACILITY INFORMATION Information describing the Tapia Water Reclamation Facility (Tapia WRF) is summarized in Table 1 and in sections I and II of the Fact Sheet (Attachment F). Section I of the Fact Sheet also includes information regarding the Facility’s permit application. II. FINDINGS The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region (Regional Water Board), finds: A. Legal Authorities. This Order serves as waste discharge requirements (WDRs) pursuant to article 4, chapter 4, division 7 of the California Water Code (CWC, commencing with section 13260). This Order is also issued pursuant to section 402 of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and implementing regulations adopted by the U.S. EPA and chapter 5.5, division 7 of the CWC (commencing with section 13370). It shall serve as a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit authorizing the Discharger to discharge into waters of the United States at the discharge location described in Table 2 subject to the WDRs in this Order.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 3.A Detailed Description of Water Quality Priorities Appendix 3.A  Detailed Description of Water Quality Priorities
    Appendix 3.A Detailed Description of Water Quality Priorities Appendix 3.A Detailed Description of Water Quality Priorities The identification of Water Quality Priorities is an important first step in the EWMP process. The Water Quality Priorities provide the basis for prioritizing implementation and monitoring activities within the EWMP and CIMP and selection and scheduling of BMPs during the RAA. The identification of Water Quality Priorities is required in Section VI.C.5.a of the Permit as part of the development of a EWMP. The Permit defines three categories of WBPCs to support the development of priorities, as shown in Table 1. The Permit establishes a four‐step process that leads to prioritization and sequencing of the water quality issues within each watershed, ultimately leading to an organized list of Water Quality Priorities, as follows: Step 1: Water quality characterization (VI.C.5.a.i, pg. 58) based on available monitoring data, TMDLs, 303(d) lists, stormwater annual reports, etc.; Step 2: Water body‐pollutant classification (VI.C.5.a.ii, pg. 59), to identify water body‐pollutant combinations that fall into three Permit defined categories; Step 3: Source assessment (VI.C.5.a.iii, pg. 59) for the water body‐pollutant combinations in the three categories; and Step 4: Prioritization of the water body‐pollutant combinations (VI.C.5.a.iv, pg. 60). Table 1. Water Body-Pollutant Classification Categories (Permit Section IV.C.5.a.ii) Water Body‐Pollutant Category Combinations (WBPCs) Included 1 WBPCs for which TMDL Water Quality Based Effluent Limits (WQBELs) and/or Receiving Water Limitations Highest Priority (RWLs) are established in Part VI.E and Attachments L and O of the MS4 Permit.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling of the Santa Monica Bay Watershed
    JULY 2009 19. Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling of the Santa Monica Bay Watershed Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this paper. The authors would also like to thank Eric Stein, Drew Ackerman, Ken Hoffman, Wing Tam, and Betty Dong for their timely advice and encouragement. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 100 N. Old San Gabriel Canyon Road Azusa, CA 91702. Preferred Citation: Sheng, J., and Wilson, J.P., 2009. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California: 18, Hydrology and Water Quality Modeling for the Santa Monica Bay Watershed. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California. Our goals are to protect and restore natural areas, restore natural hydrological function, promote equitable access to open space, and maximize support via multiple-use facilities. The Plan is a joint venture between the University of Southern California and the San Gabriel and lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, Coastal Conservancy, and Baldwin Hills Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles River Jurisdictional Determination Special Case Cover
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901 JUL 6 2010 OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR Colonel Mark Toy District Engineer, Los Angeles District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 532711 Los Ange les, California 90053-2325 Dear Colonel Toy: This letter transmits the Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdictional determination for the Los Angeles River. On August 17, 2008, EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water designated the Los Angeles River as a "Special Case" as defined by the EPA-Corps 1989 Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) regarding coordination on matters ofgeographic jurisdiction. Pursuant to the MOA, designation ofthe "Special Case" made EPA responsib le for determining the extent to which the Los Angeles River was protected as a "water ofthe United States." Specifically, EPA analyzed the river's status as a "Traditional Navigable Water," one ofseveral categories ofjurisdictional waters under the Act. We conclude that the mainstem ofthe Los Angeles River is a "Traditional Navigable Water" from its origins at the confluence of Arroyo Calabasas and Bell Creek to San Pedro Bay at the Pacific Ocean, a distance of approximately 51 miles . In reaching this conclusion, Region 9 and Headquarters staffconsidered a number offactors, including the ability ofthe Los Angeles River under current conditions offlow and depth to support navigation by watercraft; the history ofnavigation by watercraft on the river; the current commercial and recreational uses of the river; and plans for future
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Summaries
    Appendix A: Watershed Summaries Preface California’s watersheds supply water for drinking, recreation, industry, and farming and at the same time provide critical habitat for a wide variety of animal species. Conceptually, a watershed is any sloping surface that sheds water, such as a creek, lake, slough or estuary. In southern California, rapid population growth in watersheds has led to increased conflict between human users of natural resources, dramatic loss of native diversity, and a general decline in the health of ecosystems. California ranks second in the country in the number of listed endangered and threatened aquatic species. This Appendix is a “working” database that can be supplemented in the future. It provides a brief overview of information on the major hydrological units of the South Coast, and draws from the following primary sources: • The California Rivers Assessment (CARA) database (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/newcara) provides information on large-scale watershed and river basin statistics; • Information on the creeks and watersheds for the ESU of the endangered southern steelhead trout from the National Marine Fisheries Service (http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/SoCalDistrib.htm); • Watershed Plans from the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) that provide summaries of existing hydrological units for each subregion of the south coast (http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwqcbs/index.html); • General information on the ecology of the rivers and watersheds of the south coast described in California’s Rivers and Streams: Working
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Steelhead Populations Are in Danger of Extinction Within the Next 25-50 Years, Due to Anthropogenic and Environmental Impacts That Threaten Recovery
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA STEELHEAD Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus Critical Concern. Status Score = 1.9 out of 5.0. Southern steelhead populations are in danger of extinction within the next 25-50 years, due to anthropogenic and environmental impacts that threaten recovery. Since its listing as an Endangered Species in 1997, southern steelhead abundance remains precariously low. Description: Southern steelhead are similar to other steelhead and are distinguished primarily by genetic and physiological differences that reflect their evolutionary history. They also exhibit morphometric differences that distinguish them from other coastal steelhead in California such as longer, more streamlined bodies that facilitate passage more easily in Southern California’s characteristic low flow, flashy streams (Bajjaliya et al. 2014). Taxonomic Relationships: Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) historically populated all coastal streams of Southern California with permanent flows, as either resident or anadromous trout, or both. Due to natural events such as fire and debris flows, and more recently due to anthropogenic forces such as urbanization and dam construction, many rainbow trout populations are isolated in remote headwaters of their native basins and exhibit a resident life history. In streams with access to the ocean, anadromous forms are present, which have a complex relationship with the resident forms (see Life History section). Southern California steelhead, or southern steelhead, is our informal name for the anadromous form of the formally designated Southern California Coast Steelhead Distinct Population Segment (DPS). Southern steelhead occurring below man-made or natural barriers were distinguished from resident trout in the Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing, and are under different jurisdictions for purposes of fisheries management although the two forms typically constitute one interbreeding population.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Los Angeles County Arroyo Sequit Arroyo Sequit consists of about 3.3 stream miles. The arroyo is formed by the confluence of the East and West forks, from where it flows south to enter the Pacific Ocean east of Sequit Point. As part of a survey of 32 southern coastal watersheds, Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1979. The O. mykiss sampled were between about two and 6.5 inches in length. The survey report states, “Historically, small steelhead runs have been reported in this area” (DFG 1980). It also recommends, “…future upstream water demands and construction should be reviewed to insure that riparian and aquatic habitats are maintained” (DFG 1980). Arroyo Sequit was surveyed in 1989-1990 as part of a study of six streams originating in the Santa Monta Mountains. The resulting report indicates the presence of steelhead and states, “Low streamflows are presently limiting fish habitat, particularly adult habitat, and potential fish passage problems exist…” (Keegan 1990a, p. 3-4). Staff from DFG surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 1993 and captured O. mykiss, taking scale and fin samples for analysis. The individuals ranged in length between about 7.7 and 11.6 inches (DFG 1993). As reported in a distribution study, a 15-17 inch trout was observed in March 2000 in Arroyo Sequit (Dagit 2005). Staff from NMFS surveyed Arroyo Sequit in 2002 as part of a study of steelhead distribution. An adult steelhead was observed during sampling (NMFS 2002a). Additional documentation of steelhead using the creek between 2000-2007 was provided by Dagit et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Bibliography
    Issue Bibliography Abbott, C.C. Anderson, Eugene N., Jr. 1879 Artifact Descriptions. In, Report Upon 1964 A Bibliography of the Chumash and Their United States Geographical Surveys West of Predecessors. University of California the One Hundredth Meridian. 7(1):49-116, Archaeological Survey Annual Reports 61: 122-239 (Mortars and pestles are discussed 25-74. Berkeley. on pp. 70-92). U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. Armstrong, Douglas V. 1985 Archaeology on San Clemente Island, Allen, Larry G. Summer 1985. Ms. on file, Natural Resources 1985 A Habitat Analysis of Nearshore Marine Office, Naval Air Station North Island, San Fisheries from Southern California. Bulletin Diego. of the Southern California Academy of Sciences 84(3):134-155. Los Angeles. Axford, L. Michael 1975 Archaeological Research on San Clemente Alliot, Hector Island, California (Research proposal 1915 Burial Methods of the Southern California submitted to Naval Undersea Center, San Islanders. Bulletin of the Southern California Diego, California). Ms. on file, Natural Academy of Sciences 14(2). Los Angeles. Resources Office, Naval Air Station North (Reprinted in Masterkey 43(4): 125-131. Island, San Diego. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles, 1969) 1976 Archaeological Research on San Clemente 1917 Prehistoric use of bitumen in Southern Island, Progress Report. Ms. on file, Natural California. Bulletin of the Southern Califor- Resources Office, Naval Air Station North nia Academy of Sciences 16(2). Los Angeles. Island, San Diego. 1969 (see 1915) 1977 Archaeological Research on San Clemente Island, Progress Report. Ms. on file, Natural Ames, Jack A. Resources Office, Naval Air Station North 1972 California Sheephead. Ms. On file, California Island, San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project
    Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project Prepared for: CVGA Partners, LLC 1209 Santiago Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 Contact: Drew Purvis Prepared by: Carlson Strategic Land Solutions 327134A Paseo Espada, Suite 323 San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 Phone: (949) 542-7042 Contact: Brianna Bernard September 2018 Biological Technical Report for the California Grand Village Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Glossary of Terms ....................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Approach..........................................................................................1 1.2 Project Terms ........................................................................................................1 1.3 Project Location ....................................................................................................1 1.4 Existing Land Use ..................................................................................................2 2.0 Project Description ................................................................................................... 3 3.0 Regulatory Context ................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Federal Laws and Regulations...............................................................................4 3.2 California State Laws and
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COUNCIL of GOVERNMENTS a Joint Powers Authority
    SAN FERNANDO VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS A Joint Powers Authority BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA Thursday, January 21, 2021 — 1:30 p.m. DUE TO THE CLOSURE OF CITY BUILDINGS, MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC MAY CALL IN TO LISTEN TO THE MEETING Please click the link below to watch or listen to the meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/89443558659?pwd=L3VSSnk1bXMvaXNZM3JKV0pnb3 J6UT09 Or call by telephone: Dial 669-900-6833 and enter Webinar ID: 894 4355 8659 For those wishing to speak on an agenda item, please email [email protected] no ​ ​ later than 11:00 a.m. on the day of the scheduled meeting with the item number you ​ ​ ​ ​ wish to speak on and the phone number you will use when calling or the name you will use when logging into the meeting. You should then call or log into the meeting at least 10 minutes prior to its start time. Staff will unmute you and announce you when it is your time to speak. You will have two (2) minutes to speak, unless that time is adjusted by the Chair. If you do not have access to a computer please call 818-570-3408 to request public comment. As an alternative to speaking during the meeting, you can email your comments to the COG executive director at at [email protected] no later than 11am on January ​ ​ 21, 2021 to ensure that Staff San Fernando Valley Council of Governments Board of Directors Meeting ​ Agenda - T​ hursday, January 21, 2021 ​ 1 has time to organize the emails prior to the beginning of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Equestrian Trails, Inc. Serving Equestrians Since 1944 Volume 13, Issue 12 December 2013
    Equestrian Trails, Inc . Official Publication of Equestrian Trails, Inc. Serving equestrians since 1944 Volume 13, Issue 12 December 2013 Inside this issue: 2014 Trail 9 Trial Dates Corral 14 Fall 10 Drive for Larry Wilburn 100 Mules 12 Walk 7 Things to 16 Teach Your Trail Horse Members 22 Weigh In Kid’s Corner 23 Corral News 24 Upcoming Events FromFrom thethe toptop ofof VerdugoVerdugo toto thethe High Point Shows streetsstreets ofof Burbank,Burbank, thesethese mulesmules Gymkhanas traveledtraveled 240240 milesmiles fromfrom LoneLone Trail Trials & Rides PinePine toto LAECLAEC pg 12 See pages 5-6 NationalNational HolidayHoliday PartyParty Photo by Lisa Fisher Pg 8 Dedicated to Equine Legislation, Good Horsemanship, and the Acquisition and Preservation of Trails, Open Space and Public Lands ETI Contact Info Equestrian Trails Inc. PRESIDENT: Bob Foster www.etinational.com [email protected] (661) 309-7371 P.O. Box 1138 Acton, CA 93510 1st VICE PRESIDENT: Keelie Buck Phone: (818) 698-6200 [email protected] (805) 524-4486 Fax: (661) 269-2507 2nd VICE PRESIDENT: Sarah Williams Office Hours: 9:00 am—4:00 pm [email protected] (213) 400-2168 Monday—Thursday (closed Fri) IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT: Linda Debbie Foster — Office Manager, Web Master, Fullerton [email protected] Insurance, Jr. Ambassador Chair & Queen of All (818) 401-9089 Things [email protected] NATIONAL TRAIL COORDINATOR: TBD Ann Trussell — Membership — (661) 713-2358 cell DEPUTY TRAIL COORDINATOR: Terry Kaiser [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]