DOCSLIB.ORG

(CA Bar 157750) [email protected] Eliz

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(CA Bar 157750) Tfox@Creeclaw.Org Eliz Case 5:19-cv-01546-JGB-SHK Document 207 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:4195 1 Timothy P. Fox (CA Bar 157750) [email protected] 2 Elizabeth Jordan* [email protected] 3 CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER 4 1245 E. Colfax Avenue, Suite 400 5 Denver, CO 80218 Tel: (303) 757-7901 6 Fax: (303) 872-9072 7 Lisa Graybill* [email protected] Stuart Seaborn (CA Bar 198590) 8 Jared Davidson* [email protected] [email protected] Melissa Riess (CA Bar 295959) 9 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW [email protected] CENTER DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 10 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 2000 2001 Center Street, 4th Floor 11 New Orleans, Louisiana 70170 Berkeley, California 94704 Tel: (504) 486-8982 Tel: (510) 665-8644 12 Fax: (504) 486-8947 Fax: (510) 665-8511 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (continued on next page) 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 EASTERN DIVISION – RIVERSIDE 18 FAOUR ABDALLAH FRAIHAT, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-01546-JGB(SHKx) 19 Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of 20 v. Motion to Enforce the April 20, 21 U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS 2020 Preliminary Injunction Order 22 ENFORCEMENT, et al., Hearing Date: July 13, 2020 23 Defendants. Time: 2:00 pm Hon. Jesus G. Bernal 24 25 26 27 28 Case 5:19-cv-01546-JGB-SHK Document 207 Filed 07/13/20 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:4196 1 William F. Alderman (CA Bar 47381) Mark Mermelstein (CA Bar 208005) [email protected] [email protected] 2 Jake Routhier (CA Bar 324452) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & [email protected] SUTCLIFFE LLP 3 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & 777 South Figueroa Street SUTCLIFFE LLP Suite 3200 4 405 Howard Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 5 San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (213) 629-2020 Tel: (415) 773-5700 Fax: (213) 612-2499 6 Fax: (415) 773-5759 Leigh Coutoumanos* 7 Michael W. Johnson* [email protected] [email protected] Timothy Ryan** 8 Dania Bardavid* [email protected] [email protected] WILLKIE FARR & 9 Jessica Blanton* GALLAGHER LLP [email protected] 1875 K Street NW, Suite 100 10 Joseph Bretschneider** Washington, DC 20006 11 [email protected] Tel: (202) 303-1000 WILLKIE FARR & Fax: (202) 303-2000 12 GALLAGHER LLP 787 Seventh Avenue Shalini Goel Agarwal 13 New York, NY 10019 (CA Bar 254540) Tel: (212) 728-8000 [email protected] 14 Fax: (212) 728-8111 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER 15 Maia Fleischman* 106 East College Avenue [email protected] Suite 1010 16 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW Tallahassee, FL 32301 CENTER Tel: (850) 521-3024 17 2 South Biscayne Boulevard Fax: (850) 521-3001 18 Suite 3750 Miami, FL 33131 Maria del Pilar Gonzalez Morales 19 Tel: (786) 347-2056 (CA Bar 308550) Fax: (786) 237-2949 [email protected] 20 CIVIL RIGHTS EDUCATION Christina Brandt-Young* AND ENFORCEMENT CENTER 21 [email protected] 1825 N. Vermont Avenue, #27916 DISABILITY RIGHTS Los Angeles, CA 90027 22 ADVOCATES Tel: (805) 813-8896 655 Third Avenue, 14th Floor Fax: (303) 872-9072 23 New York, NY 10017 24 Tel: (212) 644-8644 Veronica Salama* Fax: (212) 644-8636 [email protected] 25 SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER 26 P.O. Box 1287 Decatur, GA, 30031 Tel: (404) 221-5825 27 Fax: (404) 221-5857 28 Attorneys for Plaintiffs (continued from previous page) *Admitted Pro Hac Vice **Pro Hac Vice Application Forthcoming Case 5:19-cv-01546-JGB-SHK Document 207 Filed 07/13/20 Page 3 of 17 Page ID #:4197 1 Table of Contents 2 3 I. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 4 II. Defendants’ Declarations Establish Noncompliance ...................................... 1 5 III. The Court Has Jurisdiction to Enforce Compliance ........................................ 3 6 IV. Defendants Have Not Rebutted the Need to Revise the PRR ......................... 5 A. Defendants Have Not Rebutted the Need for Expanded 7 Testing ................................................................................................... 5 8 B. An Adequately Revised PRR Would Limit Transfers .......................... 6 9 C. Defendants Do Not Refute Their Dangerous Segregation 10 Practices ................................................................................................. 6 11 D. An Adequate PRR Would Address Harmful Disinfectants .................. 7 12 E. Defendants Do Not Refute the Need for Other Precautions ............................................................................................ 8 13 V. Defendants’ Brief Confirms Inadequate Monitoring of the PRR ................... 8 14 VI. Defendants Fail to Refute Facts Demonstrating Their Failure to 15 Adequately Implement Court-Ordered Custody Redeterminations ............................................................................................. 9 16 VII. Appointment of a Special Master Is Necessary ............................................. 12 17 VIII. Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fraihat, et al., v. ICE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01546-JGB(SHKx) i Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Enforce the April 20, 2020 Preliminary Injunction Order Case 5:19-cv-01546-JGB-SHK Document 207 Filed 07/13/20 Page 4 of 17 Page ID #:4198 1 Table of Authorities 2 Case Page(s) 3 A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc., 284 F.3d 1091 (9th Cir. 2002) ......................................................................... 4 4 5 Armstrong v. Brown, 732 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2013) ........................................................................... 4 6 7 Hoffman v. Beer Drivers & Salesmen's Local Union No. 888, 536 F.2d 1268 (9th Cir. 1976); ........................................................................ 4 8 9 Hoptowit v. Ray, 10 682 F.2d 1237 (9th Cir. 1982) ....................................................................... 12 11 Meinhold v. U.S. Dep’t of Def., 12 34 F.3d 1469 (9th Cir. 1994) ........................................................................... 4 13 Nat’l Org. for the Reform of Marijuana Laws v. Mullen, 14 828 F.2d 536 (9th Cir. 1987) ......................................................................... 12 15 Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Sw. Marine Inc., 16 242 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2001) ................................................................... 4, 11 17 Roman v. Wolf, No. 18 EDCV2000768TJHPVCX, 2020 WL 3481564 (C.D. Cal. June 17, 2020) .... 4 19 Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co. Inc., 20 73 F.3d 546 (5th Cir. 1996) ............................................................................. 4 21 State v. Trump, 22 263 F. Supp. 3d 1049 (D. Haw. 2017) ............................................................. 4 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fraihat, et al., v. ICE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01546-JGB(SHKx) ii Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Enforce the April 20, 2020 Preliminary Injunction Order Case 5:19-cv-01546-JGB-SHK Document 207 Filed 07/13/20 Page 5 of 17 Page ID #:4199 1 I. Introduction 2 Unable to rebut Plaintiffs’ evidence of noncompliance, Defendants instead 3 resort to erecting a straw man. Both their legal positions and their factual assertions 4 address a motion to hold them in contempt for their violation of the PI Order. But 5 no such motion has been made. Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Defendants to 6 comply with the PI Order rather than punishing them for having failed to do so.1 7 Nor have Defendants shown compliance in any case. They do not seriously contest 8 the crucial need for the enforcement measures requested by Plaintiffs, instead 9 attempting to convince the Court that the PI Order requires lip service rather than 10 meaningful compliance. Not only have they failed to rebut Plaintiffs’ evidence 11 regarding custody redeterminations, testing, transfer, segregation, disinfectants, 12 and other precautionary measures, their own declarations in fact strengthen the 13 reasons why Plaintiffs’ motion should be granted. 14 II. Defendants’ Declarations Establish Noncompliance 15 Defendants urge the Court to credit Defendants’ declarations rather than 16 Plaintiffs’. Opp. at 5-6.2 But their proposed comparison of the parties’ respective 17 evidence only digs them a deeper hole. Their declarations routinely mislead the 18 Court or undermine their arguments altogether. 19 For example, Defendant Tae Johnson falsely claims that ICE has tested 20 “nearly 46% of the ICE detained population” (ECF 204-2 ¶ 21). He derives that 21 figure by comparing the total number of tests since testing began (~10,500) with 22 only the current population in detention (~23,000). But since March 1, ICE has 23 24 1 Thus, while Plaintiffs have shown by “clear and convincing evidence” that Defendants are non-compliant with the PI Order, that evidentiary standard is 25 inapposite here because Plaintiffs seek only enforcement of the PI Order—not a finding of civil contempt. 26 2 Defendants’ argument that Plaintiffs’ evidence is inadmissible hearsay is also meritless. The Court has already rejected Defendants’ argument, ECF 132 at 5 n.4, 27 and, in any event, they have failed to comply with the Standing Order’s 28 requirements for evidentiary objections. Standing Order at 9-10; Opp. at 5. Fraihat, et al., v. ICE, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01546-JGB(SHKx) 1 Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Enforce the April 20, 2020 Preliminary Injunction Order Case 5:19-cv-01546-JGB-SHK Document 207 Filed 07/13/20 Page 6 of 17 Page ID #:4200 1 removed over 41,000 people from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gonsalves Declaration
    Case 3:20-cv-00540-SRU Document 12-5 Filed 04/22/20 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ____________________________________ ) DAVID TERWILLIGER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) No. 3:20-cv-540 ROLLIN COOK, Commissioner, ) Connecticut Department of Correction, and ) NICK RODRIGUEZ, Warden, Osborn ) April 22, 2020 Correctional Institution, ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________) DECLARATION OF GREGG S. GONSALVES I, Gregg S. Gonsalves, upon my personal knowledge, and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare as follows: 1. I am an epidemiologist at the Yale School of Medicine and School of Public Health. I have worked at the schools of medicine and public health since 2017. Attached as Exhibit A is my CV. 2. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a virus closely related to the SARS virus. In its least serious form, COVID-19 can cause illness including fever, cough, and shortness of breath. However, for individuals who become more seriously ill, a common complication is bilateral interstitial pneumonia, which causes partial or total collapse of the lung alveoli, making it difficult or impossible for patients to breathe. Thousands of patients have required hospital-grade respirators, and COVID-19 can progress from a fever to life-threatening pneumonia with what are known as “ground-glass opacities,” a lung abnormality that inhibits breathing. 3. In about 16% of cases of COVID-19, illness is severe including pneumonia with respiratory failure, septic shock, multi organ failure, and even death. 4. Certain populations of people are at particular risk of contracting severe cases of COVID- 19.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Northern Division Brittany Waddell, Roger Ewing, Tony Sm
    Case 3:20-cv-00340-TSL-RHW Document 6 Filed 05/25/20 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION BRITTANY WADDELL, ROGER EWING, TONY SMITH, DANIEL HATTEN, DOUGLASS TRIPLETT, ERIK LEWIS, BOB HENDERSON, THOMAS HOLDER, and JAMARCUS DAVIS, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-340-TSL-RHW Plaintiffs, v. TOMMY TAYLOR, in his official capacity as Interim Commissioner of the Mississippi ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Department of Corrections; RON KING, in his official capacity as Superintendent of Central Mississippi Correctional Facility; and JOE ERRINGTON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1 Case 3:20-cv-00340-TSL-RHW Document 6 Filed 05/25/20 Page 2 of 6 1. Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court enter a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction requiring the Defendants to effectively implement COVID-19 prevention and management protocols consistent with established standards of care for infection control and CDC guidelines. Pursuant to Local Rule 7(b)(6)(A), Plaintiffs respectfully request oral argument on this motion. 2. The Plaintiffs, who have brought this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, are Brittany Waddell, Roger Ewing, Tony Smith, Daniel Hatten, Douglass Triplett, Erik Lewis, Bob Henderson, Thomas Holder, and Jamarcus Davis. They are residents of Mississippi’s two largest prisons, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility (CMCF) and South Mississippi Correctional Institution (SMCI), home to nearly 6,000 residents, combined.1 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonsalves Reply Declaration
    Case 1:20-cv-10617-WGY Document 33-5 Filed 04/02/20 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Maria Alejandra Celimen Savino, et al., Petitioners-Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-10617- WGY v. Steven J. Souza, Respondent-Defendant. REPLY DECLARATION OF GREGG GONSALVES I, Gregg S. Gonsalves, upon my personal knowledge, and in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declare as follows: 1. I am an epidemiologist at the Yale School of Medicine and School of Public Health. I have worked at the schools of medicine and public health since 2017. I submit this to respond to the information provided by the Defendant in his opposition to the motion for temporary restraining order and as a supplement to my prior declaration in ths case. See ECF No. 12-2. I understand that my CV was inadvertently not filed with my first declaration and so I attach it here as Exhibit A. 2. I have reviewed the relevant filings in this matter, Savino v. Souza, including the statements and declarations of Plaintiffs, putative Plaintiffs’ class members and their families, lawyers with familiarity with the Bristol County House of Correction and immigration facilities (“BCHOC”), as well as arguments and declarations filed by Defendant. Dkt. Nos. 1-4, 1-5, 12-2, 12-3, 12-4, 12-5, 12-6, 12-7, 12-8, 12-9, 20-3, 20-4, 26, 26-1, 26-2, 26-3. 3. The following represents my expert opinion as to several of Defendant’s claims based on my review of these filings and drawing on my knowledge and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Medical Experts
    Tribunal Estadual do Rio de Janeiro Ministério Público e Defensoria Pùblica do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Petitioners-Plaintiffs, v. Matter of Ação Civil Pública #0087229-92.2020.8.19.0001 Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Município do Rio de Janeiro e Associação Filantrópica Nova Esperança (Pronto Socorro Geral Hamilton Agostinho), Respondents-Defendants. OPINION OF MEDICAL EXPERTS GREGG GONSALVES, PH.D., JASON ANDREWS, M.D., TED COHEN, M.D., M.P.H., D.P.H., JULIO CRODA, M.D., ALBERT KO, M.D., JOSÉ ROBERTO LAPA E SILVA, M.D., PH.D., MARY PETRONE, KATHARINE WALTER, PH.D., MSC. 1. We, Gregg Gonsalves, Jason Andrews, Ted Cohen, Julio Croda, Albert Ko, José Roberto Lapa e Silva, Mary Petrone and Katharine Walter, hereby declare under penalty of perjury, that the following is true and correct to the best of our knowledge: RELEVANT BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS Gregg Gonsalves, Ph.D., Assistant Professor in Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases; Associate Professor of Law and Research Scholar in Law Yale School of Medicine, Yale Law School 2. I am an Assistant Professor in Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases at the Yale School of Medicine and an Associate Professor of Law and Research Scholar in Law at Yale Law School. I co-direct the Yale Law School/Yale School of Public Health Global Health Justice Partnership. I was the Co-Director of the Yale Law School/Yale School of Public Health/Yale Medical School Collaboration on Research Integrity and Transparency and the Co-Faculty Director of Global Health Studies at Yale College until May 2020. Among others, I also have held appointments at Harvard Medical School, the Institut Pasteur, and the University of Cape Town.
    [Show full text]
  • To: Yale New Haven Health System Leadership Marna P. Borgstrom
    To: Yale New Haven Health System Leadership Marna P. Borgstrom - Chief Executive Officer Christopher O'Connor - Chief Operating Officer Thomas Balcezak - Chief Clinical Officer Richard D'Aquila - President, Yale New Haven Hospital Anne Diamond - President, Bridgeport Hospital Pamela Scagliarini - Chief Operating Officer, Bridgeport Hospital Patrick Green - Chief Executive Officer, L+M Healthcare Norman Roth - President and Chief Executive Office, Greenwich Hospital Diane Kelly - Chief Operating Officer, Greenwich Hospital Prathibha Varkey - Chief Executive Officer, Northeast Medical Group Vincent Petrini - Chief Policy and Communications Officer Mark D'Antonio - Media Coordinator, Yale New Haven Hospital William Aseltyne - Senior Vice President Legal Services We are a coalition of individuals and local organizations concerned about the significant negative impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the lives of immigrant community members, especially those who may be undocumented. As one of the flagship hospitals of the state, and as a leader in providing care for all Connecticut residents regardless of documentation or insurance status, Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS) has the opportunity to publicly commit to caring for some of our most vulnerable populations during this public health crisis. Our undocumented immigrant communities bear particular risks during this pandemic: Undocumented individuals will not receive the coronavirus $1,200 stimulus check to put toward emergent medical care. Many individuals defer presenting for care for fear of ICE raids. These fears have only multiplied under the Public Charge Rule, which we have already seen deters immigrants from seeking coronavirus treatment and testing. The Connecticut residents who are at risk of falling through the cracks due to their immigration status are also often the state’s most essential workers.
    [Show full text]
  • August 10, 2021 the Honorable Ron Klain White House Chief of Staff
    August 10, 2021 The Honorable Ron Klain White House Chief of Staff The Honorable Jake Sullivan National Security Advisor The Honorable Jeffrey Zients White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear Mr. Klain, Mr. Sullivan, and Mr. Zients: Attached is a letter endorsed by over 175 leading scientists and civil society leaders as well as over 50 organizations calling on the Biden Administration to rapidly scale up mRNA vaccine manufacturing capacity to reach approximately 4 billion people by the end of 2021. We request a meeting with the three of you to discuss the content of this letter and your plans for scaling up vaccine manufacturing to meet global need. The emergence of the Delta variant highlights the risk of newer, emerging variants that threaten the progress made to date on the pandemic in the United States. Ambitious leadership is needed now to vaccinate the world. Namely, we implore the Biden Administration to: ● Commit to establishing 8 billion doses per year of mRNA vaccine capacity within six months using existing federal resources. A plan for this should be announced within one month. ● Simultaneously develop and implement training and technology transfer for the development and manufacture of mRNA and other vaccines in hubs around the world. ● Begin immediate export of vaccine doses to COVAX or through other international distribution mechanisms — of at least 10 million doses per week. This letter’s signatories include five Deans of leading public health, nursing, and medical schools; faculty from 20 universities, including Harvard University, Yale University, University of Washington, and Columbia University; numerous MacArthur Fellows; a former CDC Director; and countless civil society leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 5:20-Cv-10829-JEL-APP
    Case 5:20-cv-10829-JEL-APP ECF No. 117 filed 06/15/20 PageID.4016 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN JANET MALAM, Petitioner-Plaintiff, - against - No. 5:20-cv-10829-JEL-APP REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al., Respondent-Defendants. PLAINTIFFS WAAD BARASH, LENCHE KRCOSKA, YOHANDRY LEY SANTANA, SERGIO PEREZ PAVON, JOHANNA WHERNMAN, AND WILLIAM WHERNMAN’S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Case 5:20-cv-10829-JEL-APP ECF No. 117 filed 06/15/20 PageID.4017 Page 2 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................................2 ARGUMENT .............................................................................................................6 I. Plaintiffs Have Demonstrated a Likelihood of Success on the Merits ...............................................................................................................6 A. Detention During the Pandemic Violates Plaintiffs’ Due Process Rights. ...................................................................................... 6 B. Plaintiffs’ Detention Also Violates Their Due Process Rights Under the Deliberate Indifference Test, Should the Court Apply that Test. ................................................................... 10 II. The Other Preliminary Injunction Factors Weigh in Plaintiffs’ Favor. .............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Affirmation of Dr Gonsalves
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX ---------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES HOLDEN and ALBERTO FRIAS on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated Index No. individuals, Petitioners, AFFIRMATION OF - against - GREGG GONSALVES HOWARD A. ZUCKER, as Commissioner of Health for New York State, and ANDREW M. CUOMO, as Governor of the State of New York, Respondents. For a Judgment Pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, ------------------------------------------------------------------------X I, Gregg Gonsalves, hereby affirm as follows: Qualifications 1. I am an epidemiologist at the Yale School of Medicine and School of Public Health. I have worked at the schools of medicine and public health since 2017. I am also an associate professor (adjunct) of law and co-director of the Global Health Justice Partnership at Yale School of Law. I have worked for over 30 years on global health issues. I have written and published extensively on topics addressing infectious diseases among people involved in the criminal justice system. I am a 2018 recipient of a John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation MacArthur Fellowship. 2. My C.V. includes a full list of my honors, experiences, and publications. It is attached as Exhibit A. 3. I have been asked to comment on the high risk of COVID-19 infection, illness, and death in jails and prisons in New York, and why people incarcerated in such congregate settings should be prioritized in vaccine
    [Show full text]