An Old Wound Finally Healed: Vincennes University’S Struggle for Survival

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Old Wound Finally Healed: Vincennes University’S Struggle for Survival An Old Wound Finally Healed: Vincennes University’s Struggle for Survival Matthew E. Welsh* AUTHORS NOTE In the 1955 session of the Indiana General Assembly, Vin- cennes University, situated in my Senate district, asked that the state double its support to the school on a continuing and predict- able basis. The university was then receiving public funds by way of a Knox County property tax, which the state matched, but the money thus generated was not nearly enough to meet the school’s needs. I knew that additional funds would not be easily come by unless solid reasons were presented and the interest and support of the legislative leadership obtained. To this end I put together the bits and pieces of the school’s history that I had learned during my many years as a trustee, focusing upon the bitter political struggle that had almost destroyed the school and fashioning the story into a political drama that I hoped would command the sym- pathetic attention of the legislators. What follows is that story and the legislature’s reaction to it. The article was given as a paper before the Indianapolis Literary Club on October 6, 1986, and an abbreviated version was included in the 1978 yearbook of the So- ciety of Indiana Pioneers. *** After William Henry Harrison, Indiana’s first territorial gov- ernor, came to Vincennes, the capital of the territory, he caused to be organized in 1801 Jefferson Academy for instruction of the chil- * Matthew E. Welsh, a Democrat, served in the Indiana House as a represent- ative from Knox County during the 1941 and 1943 sessions. In 1955 he was elected to the Indiana Senate from Knox and Daviess counties and served in that capacity until August, 1960. Welsh was governor of Indiana from 1961 to 1965. He has been a member of the Vincennes University Board of Trustees since 1943. INDIANA MAGAZINE OF HISTOKY, LXXXIV ISeptember. 1988,. 1988. Trustees of Indiana llniversity 218 Indiana Magazine of History dren of the settlers and the Indians of the area. This was the first educational institution in Indiana Territory, which consisted of what are now the states of Indiana, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, and a portion of Minnesota; and it is thought to be the second oldest such institution west of the Alleghenies, preceded only by Transylvania College in Kentucky, which was founded in 1780.’ In December of that same year, 1801, Harrison and five other trustees of Jefferson Academy petitioned the United States Con- gress for a donation of land to be used for the development of an “Institution for the Education of Youth” similar to the one that had been granted for an “institution on the Ohio Purchase on the Mu- skingum.”2 The petition was referred to a three-man committee for consideration but apparently occasioned no congressional action. In December, 1802, however, a “general convention of the [Indiana] Territory,” called and chaired by Harrison as governor, included in its list of “representations to the Congress of the United States” a request for federal assistance for education.3 In response to this petition of 1802 Congress in 1804 adopted an act for survey and disposal of public lands and provided that in each of the three land districts established in Indiana Territory (namely at Detroit, Vin- cennes, and Kaskaskia) one entire township was to be reserved for a seminary of learning, the township to be designated by the sec- retary of the trea~ury.~Thus Harrison and his colleagues were suc- cessful in obtaining a land grant as an endowment for the new institution of learning. The grant consisted of a six-mile-square congressional township, which was set aside by Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin on October 10, 1806, comprising 23,040 acres located at Township 2 South, Range 11 West, which is now known as Patoka Township of Gibson County.s I E. Bierhaus & Sons, a wholesale grocery firm in Vincennes, erected a large highway sign at the edge of town that proclaimed Vincennes University to be “the oldest college west of the Alleghenies.” When advised of Transylvania’s earlier founding date, the company salvaged its sign by adding in small letters, “and north of the Ohio.” ‘This institution is today Ohio University at Athens, Ohio, which traces its origin back to the Ordinance of 1787 and the Ohio Company. Earlier plans for the establishment of this school at Marietta on the Muskingum River gave way to the eventual site in the center of the Ohio Company land grant. Ohio University was incorporated in 1804. See William E. Peters, Legal History of the Ohio University, Athens, Ohio . (Cincinnati, 1910), 86-88, passim. The original petition for funds for an educational institution at Vincennes in Indiana Territory is on file in the National Archives, Washington, D.C. .I Logan Esarey, ed., Messages and Letters of William Henry Harrison: Vol. I, 1800-181 1 (Indiana Historical Collections, Vol. VII; Indianapolis, 1922), 64. Annals of Congress, 7 Cong., 1 sess., p. 497; ibid., 8 Cong., 1 sess., Appendix, pp. 1285-93. Albert Gallatin to John Badollet, October 10, 1806, in The Territorial Papers of the United States: Vol. VII, The Territory of Indiana, 2800-1810, ed. Clarence E. Carter (Washington, D.C., 1939), 394-95. WILLIAMHENRY HARRISON Courtesy Byron H Lewis Historical Library. Vincennes University 220 Indiana Magazine of History Shortly thereafter, on November 29, 1806, the territorial leg- islature incorporated “the Vincennes University”-not a college or a seminary but a “university.” The newly chartered school, which took over the activities of Jefferson Academy, was to receive the township of land already set aside by Gallatin.6 The preamble of the chartering act indicates that the legislature, struggling to es- tablish an orderly society in the wilderness, had high hopes for the new institution. It reads: AN ACT to Incorporate an University in the Indiana Territory. WHEREAS the independence, happiness and energy of every republic depends (under the influence of the destinies of Heaven) upon the wisdom, virtue, tallents and energy, of its citizens and rulers. And whereas, science, literature, and the liberal arts, contribute in an eminent degree, to improve those qualities and acquirements. And whereas, learning hath ever been found the ablest advocate of genuine liberty, the best supporter of rational religion, and the source of the only solid and imperishable glory, which nations can acquire. And forasmuch, as literature, and philosophy, furnish the most useful and pleasing occupations, improveing and varying the enjoyments of prosperity, afford- ing relief under the pressure of misfortune, and hope and consolation in the hour of death. And considering that in a commonwealth, where the humblest citizen may be elected to the highest public office, and where the Heaven born prerogative of the right to elect, and to reject, is retained, and secured to the citizens, the knowl- edge which is requisite for a magistrate and elector, should be widely diffused. 1st. Be it therefore enacted by the Legislative Council and House of Represen- tatives, That an University be, and is hereby instituted and incorporated within this Territory, to be called and known by the name, or style of the “Vincennes University”. .7 Among the powers given to the trustees of Vincennes Univer- sity by the 1806 act of the territorial legislature was the authority to sell 4,000 acres of the 23,040-acre township grant made by Con- gress “for the use and support of the University . for the purpose of putting into immediate operation the said institution . and to lease or rent the remaining part of said township, to the best ad- vantage, for the use of said public school, or University.”6 It should be noted that the act contained no specific language formally con- veying legal title of the township to the university, and apparently nothing in the nature of a deed or patent was ever placed on re- cord. Certainly, however, the trustees could reasonably assume that the territorial government by such language had released to the Francis S. Philbrick, ed., The Laws of Indiana Territory, 1801-1809 (Collec- tions of the Illinois State Historical Library, Vol. XXI; Springfield, 1930), 178-84. Vincennes University is thought to be the thirty-ninth oldest college in the United States and, along with Transylvania, shares the distinction of being founded by a future president of the United States. Thomas Jefferson was governor of Virginia in 1780 when Transylvania was chartered. The University of Virginia was later founded by Jefferson in 1820, after he left office as president of the United States. Quoted from ibid., 178. “ Quoted from ibid., 179. Vincennes University’s Struggle for Survival 221 university any claim it had to this grant. Also granted by the act was the authority to conduct a lottery as a means of raising funds, and a lottery to raise six thousand dollars was in fact authorized by the university’s Board of Trustees in 1806. It was a financial disaster! The tickets did not sell even when offered on credit. The proceeds received were refunded, and the university had to pay the expenses incur~ed.~ A word needs to be said here about the men who served on the Board of Trustees of Vincennes University throughout the years. Many were among the most prominent citizens of the territory and state. One indication of their prominence is the fact that a number of Indiana counties were named after board members; viz., (Henry) Vanderburgh, (John) Gibson, (Toussaint) Dubois, (Benjamin) Parke, (Francis) Vigo, (William Henry) Harrison, etc. Other influential trustees were Waller Taylor, one of Indiana’s first two United States senators; John Rice Jones, first attorney general of Indiana Terri- tory; General Washington Johnston, lawyer and founder of Free- masonry in Indiana Territory; and John Badollet, first register of the Vincennes Land Office.
Recommended publications
  • Election Division Presidential Electors Faqs and Roster of Electors, 1816
    Election Division Presidential Electors FAQ Q1: How many presidential electors does Indiana have? What determines this number? Indiana currently has 11 presidential electors. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States provides that each state shall appoint a number of electors equal to the number of Senators or Representatives to which the state is entitled in Congress. Since Indiana has currently has 9 U.S. Representatives and 2 U.S. Senators, the state is entitled to 11 electors. Q2: What are the requirements to serve as a presidential elector in Indiana? The requirements are set forth in the Constitution of the United States. Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 provides that "no Senator or Representative, or person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector." Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment also states that "No person shall be... elector of President or Vice-President... who, having previously taken an oath... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Congress may be a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability." These requirements are included in state law at Indiana Code 3-8-1-6(b). Q3: How does a person become a candidate to be chosen as a presidential elector in Indiana? Three political parties (Democratic, Libertarian, and Republican) have their presidential and vice- presidential candidates placed on Indiana ballots after their party's national convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Underwear SETS Till PACE for the OTHER STATES I M) I a X a It I : Ptrni.Ica
    4 THE OMAII.A DAILY BBB: THURSDAY, APRIIi 'JO, 15)00. Telephones CIS and COf. Dec, April 25, 1500. Resolutions endorsing that the service hns too valuable to largo i REPUBLICAN UNITY IN OHIO EXIT PNEUMATIC MAIL TUBE both tho national and state administrations business communities to bo dispensed with went through and wcro unanimously On motion by- - Moon of Tennessee the - 87 adopted,, .- house, to 50, voted to eliminate ,,f 4 j, j the entlro Muslin Henry C. Payne, vlll undoubtedly be paragraph, Bute Convention Doss Not Even Ballot for Ecandila Revealed Cants the House, to Vote chosen tobuccwd 4Hmserf'3s national com- Roberts' Smu'e'ssor Sworn In, Candidates, mitteeman for Wisconsin at tho Philadel- Againit It. At the opening of tho cf the houso phia convention. ucdon today William H. King, who served In the KItty-flft- h congress Underwear SETS Till PACE FOR THE OTHER STATES i M) i a x a it i : ptrni.iCA . s linh. CHARGES MADE BY CONGRESSMAN MOODY from tho state of Utah, was sworn Jn as a representative of that Mo Mlntitlttnsr the .llennlna of tUr I'lnt-forj- n, state to succeed Hrlgham H. Roberts, who Thi's muslin underwear is 'Aelilovriiientfi of Prrnlilpnt nml Adopted. Hp AssnlU Tulip was denied a cat. Ihr INDIANAPOLIS, ind., April 25. Like nn Piimiiintlc Company Party In ConnrrKN ItrvliMVdl avalanche, the' horde of delegates to the re- Afi'iist-- l.ntc Aftftlntnnt PoRtmiia-Ic- r ISiiiorHi-ne- y IIOIINIIS A(ilti:i: ON HAWAII 1111,1,. made just as tasteful women Riltinl to Kvery publican ntato convention swept Into Tom-llne- (imcrnl nml I'oriner Mem- In 1'iinI.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • History of Warrick and Its Prominent People : from the Earliest Time to The
    Class _L5J3l2^^ Copyright N^ COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. HISTORY i>T O F W A R R I C K AND ITS PROMINENT PEOPLE From the Earliest Time to the Present; Together with Interesting- Biographical Sketches, Reminiscences, Notes, Etc. '^Uvo-v-. LLUSTRATED NINETEEN HUNDRED AND NINE CRESCENT PUBLICATION COMPANY '^9 1 B o o n \ i 1 e , Indiana b V \H^ ^ TO T TI A T () X E Whose encouragenienl aiul aid resulted in this work THIS V O L U iM E is (iratefullv Dech'iated. LIBRARY of CONGRESS Two COBies Received MAY 17 1909 Copyriunt tntry g COPYRIGHT 1909 NO CLASS A[ ^ XXc. BY MONTE M. KATTERJOHf PREFACE. Tliis volume is doubtless one with many faults, for no history extant is free from errors. Great care was taken in preparing the matter found herein, and all discrepancies were eradicated. I n- just criticism cannot rectify the errors that are sure to apjiear, and the author feels assured that all thoughtful jjeople will recognize and a])preciate the undertaking, also realize that a i)ublic benefit has been accomplished. The biographical sectioii is devoted to the record of men, living and dead. If it is incomplete, the fault cannot be justly attributed to the author. Many people were solicited, but on mone- tary grounds refused to support the publication. Those who read this book, and who know what constitutes a true history, will agree with the author that this volume is sujierior to any ever published in this county, inasmuch as its fine illustra- tions are a single history within themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • HPI Power 50: Can We Figure It Out? the ‘Rubber Match’ in 2012 Comes As Real Doubt Festers on the Political Process by BRIAN A
    V17, N18 Thursday, Jan. 5, 2012 HPI Power 50: Can we figure it out? The ‘rubber match’ in 2012 comes as real doubt festers on the political process By BRIAN A. HOWEY in Indianapolis and MARK SCHOEFF JR. in Washington The 2012 Howey Politics Indiana Power 50 is the most troubling compilation this publication has brought into the public purview in the 18 years we’ve existed. The political process is so utterly broken, we are not sure the nation can survive in a way we know and recognize it today. We’ve read a steady stream of commentary - ranging from Gov. Mitch Daniels and President Obama shake hands, then talk in May at the sober Mitch the Indianapolis International Airport. The two could still be on opposite Daniels, to the tickets in what could be an epic election this November. wild-eyed Pat Buchanan, to the globe-trotting thers and grandmothers - to the stewardship of my g-g-g- Thomas Friedman - warning of a financial cataclysm that generation, the Baby Boomers. will leave a very different America for our children and grandchildren. We’ve gone from a nation created by the Continued on page 4 “Greatest Generation” - our father and mothers, grandfa- An open letter to Dan Parker By SHAW R. FRIEDMAN LaPORTE - This is an open letter to Indiana Demo- cratic Chairman Dan Parker. Dear Dan: “We refuse to let the most It’s clear you’re going to be around this year and those of us who desperately wanted a controversial public policy bill change in state party leadership and those who were satisfied with the sta- of the decade be railroaded tus quo are going to have to find a way through and the public denied a to “peacefully co-exist” if we are going to elect a Democratic governor in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Judges for the Indiana Territory, District of Indiana, and Southern District of Indiana
    FEDERAL JUDGES FOR THE INDIANA TERRITORY, DISTRICT OF INDIANA, AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA CONSTITUTIONAL (ARTICLE III) JUDGES WITH DATES OF COMMISSION UNITED STATES TERRITORIAL COURT FOR THE INDIANA TERRITORY (Created on October 6, 1800 with the establishment of the Indiana Territory.) William Clark October 6, 1800 John Griffin October 6, 1800 Henry Vanderburgh October 6, 1800 Thomas T. Davis February 8, 1803 Weller Taylor April 16, 1806 Benjamin Parke April 23, 1808 James Fisk July 2, 1812 James Scott February 1, 1813 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA (Created on March 6, 1817, replacing the territorial court when Indiana was admitted as a state.) Benjamin Parke March 6, 1817 Jesse Lynch Holman September 16, 1835 Elisha Mills Huntington May 2, 1842 Caleb Blood Smith December 22, 1862 Albert Smith White January 18, 1864 David McDonald December 13, 1864 Walter Quintin Gresham December 21, 1869 William A. Woods May 2, 1883 John Harris Baker March 29, 1892 Albert Barnes Anderson December 8, 1902 Robert C. Baltzell January 13, 19251 Thomas Whitten Slick February 17, 19252 1. Assigned to the newly-created Southern District on April 21, 1928. 2. Assigned to the newly-created Northern District on April 21, 1928. 730 INDIANA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 37:729 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA (Created on April 21, 1928 when the state was split into northern and southern districts.) Robert C. Baltzell April 21, 1928 William E. Steckler April 7, 1950 Cale James Holder August 6, 1954 S. Hugh Dillin September 22, 1961 James E.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaties of St Marys
    Anatomy of The 1818 Treaties of St. Marys; Their Impact on the Miami, Delaware, New York Tribes and Indiana By A. Andrew Olson III, December 20, 2011; © A A Olson, 2011 With the end of the American Revolution and subsequent signing of the Northwest Ordinance in 1787, a flood of pioneer families streamed across the Appalachian Mountains to the newly organizing lands just beyond to the West. Fledgling territorial government officials, driven in part by a tidal wave of white migration, sought increasing amounts of land from Native Tribes – some of which had already been imposed upon with regularity by the new American Nation. As populations in the eastern portions of the Northwest Territory reached threshold levels, the new states of Ohio and Indiana had been admitted into the Union by the end of 1816. None-the-less, vast portions of these new states remained in the hands of Native Tribes. To rectify this situation, a series of pivotally important treaties were authorized in 1817 and 1818. In the fall of 1818 alone six separate treaties were completed at St. Marys, Ohio between the US Government and the Wyandot, Seneca, Shawnese and Ottawas (September 17th), with the Wyandot (September 20th), the Potawatomi (October 2nd), the Wea (October 2nd), the Delaware (October 3rd) and the Miami (October 6th).1 These treaties brought vast amounts of land under control of the US and by reference Ohio and Indiana, ushering in the dramatic settlement and expansion of Indiana in particular. The negotiations resulted in wholesale removal of the Delaware from Indiana, substantially prevented the planned migration and settlement of the Brothertown and Stockbridge in Indiana, and set the future direction for the displacement of the Miami from their Indiana homeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Varney-Porter Family Papers, 1756-1939 (Bulk 1808-1922)
    Collection # M 0639 OM 0297 VARNEY-PORTER FAMILY PAPERS, 1756-1939 (BULK 1808-1922) Collection Information 1 Historical Background 2 Scope and Content Note 3 Contents 4 Processed by: Paul Brockman 7 October 1993 Updated 11 May 2004 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 9 manuscript boxes, 2 oversize manuscript folders, 2 photograph COLLECTION: boxes, 3 OVA photograph folders COLLECTION Inclusive 1756-1939; Bulk, 1808-1922 DATES: PROVENANCE: Barbara A. Walters for the estate of Constance Varney Cannon Van Devanter, Burnsville, North Carolina, 26 August 1991 RESTRICTIONS: None REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection must RIGHTS: be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE None FORMATS: RELATED Albert Gallatin Porter Collection (M 0396) HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1991.0692 NUMBER: NOTES: Indiana Historical Society Varney-Porter Page 1 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND This collection primarily consists of the papers and photographs of several individuals connected with the Varney and Porter families: Thomas Randolph (1771-1811) was born in Richmond, Virginia, attended William & Mary College, studied law, and came to the Indiana Territory in 1807. Shortly after his arrival, Randolph was appointed Attorney General for the territory by Governor William Henry Harrison. In 1810 he married Catherine Lawrence, a stepdaughter of General James Dill. Randolph was the Virginia, or pro-slavery, party's choice for Congress in 1809, but he was defeated by Jonathan Jennings in the election for Territorial Representative by thirty-nine votes. Randolph contested the election, but his appeal was denied by the election committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Why the People Are So Damn Angry New Economic Realities Putting the ‘American Dream’ out of Reach of the Middle Class by BRIAN A
    V21, 39 Thursday, June 9, 2016 Why the people are so damn angry New economic realities putting the ‘American Dream’ out of reach of the middle class By BRIAN A. HOWEY MICHIGAN CITY, Ind. – Ameri- cans and Hoosiers are angry. They are seeking political retribution. They are finding Republican presidential nomi- nee Donald Trump as the answer. But the critical question that has remained largely unanswered is why? Why are We the People so pissed off? Appearing at two events in Angry Donald Trump supporters confront U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz in Marion on the eve of the Elkhart last week, President Barack Indiana primary on May 2 Obama laid out the template for the doesn’t always yield the wisest decision making. sizzling anger that is fueling one of the most unpredict- At the Lerner Theater in Elkhart, PBS moderator able political climates in modern times. And Prof. Robert J. Gwen Ifill listened as Obama made what Howey Politics In- Gordon of Northwestern University, a macroeconomist and diana called an “economic victory lap,” where the president economic historian, supplies an array of data that helps reminded the Republican-dominated county that the 20% understand why the political decisions of 2016 are almost Continued on page 4 certainly being framed in the context of an emotion which Party of Lincoln stained By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On May 17, 1860, the Repub- lican convention campaign team of native son Abraham Lincoln met with the Indiana and Pennsylvania delega- tions in Chicago. What emerged hours later was that the Hoosier delegation would vote “Oh, look at my African-Ameri- as a solid bloc for the president who would go on to become the can over here.
    [Show full text]
  • Warrick County and the Northwest Territory by WILLIAML
    Warrick County and the Northwest Territory By WILLIAML. BARKER,Boonville I have taken some time to look over the old Warrick county records of 1813 to 1823 and cull the names of the men who were prominent in local affairs when the jurisdiction of our courts extended from the Wabash to the Blue river. An old abstract office accumulates quite a bit of historical junk, and it is a piece picked up here and another there that I am offering today. A Japanese writer in the Saturday Evening Post began his article by saying, “History is a romance on a big scale. The story of Abraham Lincoln will never cease to interest the millions in far off lands. It is a unique story, abounding in human interest, only possible in such a vast country as America.” It seems to me that if the teacher and student read history in that spirit it would be an enjoyable play. Ten years before Warrick was cut off from Knox, the first county organized in Indiana Territory, and two years before the government survey, John Sprinkle and his family settled on a beautiful piece of Ohio river front, now in War- rick county. In the month of June, 1807, General W. Johnston, who was a very prominent man in the early history of the territory and state, and known as the “Father of Freemasonry in Indiana,” entered this land, and in the year 1812, John Sprinkle, as the assignee of Johnston, received a patent for it. At the time of Sprinkle’s settlement, June, 1803, it was the site of an Indian village.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Couts Cousins
    CALIFORNIA’S COUTS COUSINS IN MEMORY OF OUR FRIEND, JAMES ARMSTRONG A Bi-annual Newsletter for the Descendants of the Couts Family #47 WELCOME- It is the goal of this newsletter to create interest in and share the research for the Couts (pronounced Koutz) and Allied Family genealogy. It can only be written with the cooperation of each family member. We encourage each of you to send in your family group sheets and enter data as far back as you can find. The information that you find within its covers will be as “true” as we can prove. We gladly accept articles, photos, genealogy lines, and family stories. We plan to complete this edition to Newsletter #50 and then, we will end the series. IS IT PROOF? For over twenty years, brother Bo Couts and I have been looking for proof that Teter Couts (Dietrich Kautz) was related to Henry Couts (believed to be his son). Are they related? I think that we’ve found a piece of proof. We know that Henry Couts was related to Chrisley Couts, John Couts, and Margaret Couts. Chrisley Couts Jr. and Margaret Couts were left money and land in Henry’s will. Chrisley Couts Jr.’s father was Chrisley Couts Sr. Chrisley Couts, Sr’s (d. 1790) tombstone was carved (Chrisley Couts, brother of John Couts, 1811) and was placed in the Couts Cemetery on the John Armstrong farm, former land of John and Chrisley Couts. John Couts bought Chrisley’s land from his heirs probably before their mother’s (Sarah Wright Couts Collins) death circa 1811 and before they all headed to Indiana and Missouri on a wagon train with the Bartons, Collins, and Caldwells.
    [Show full text]
  • 1896. Congressional Rec9rd-House. 11
    1896. CONGRESSIONAL REC9RD-HOUSE. 11 Another topic in 'Yhich our_people rightfully take a deep inter­ HOUSE OF REP~ESENTATIVES. est may be here br1efly considered. I refer to the existence of trusts and other huge aggregations of capital, the object of which MONDAY, ·Decembe1· 7, 1896. · ~s to secure the monopoly of some particular branch of trade }ndustry, or commerce and to stifle wholesome competition. Whe~ T~s being the day fixed by the Constitution for the annual .'Fh.ese are def~nded it is usually on ~he ground that though they meetmg of Congress, the H~use of. Representatiyes of the Fifty­ mcr~ase profits they also reduce pnces and thus may benefit the fourth Congress assembled m therr Hall for therr second session public. It must be remembered, however, that a reduction of at 12 o'clock m. · prices to th.e peol?le is not one of the real objects of these organiza- The SPEAKER (Ron. THOMAS B. REED, a Representative tions, nor IS theu tendency necessarily in that direction. If it from the State of ~faine) called the House to order. · .occurs in a particular case it is only because it accords with the The _Chaplain of the House, Rev. H. N. CounEN, offered the purposes or interests of those managing the scheme. follo~ng prayer: ' · - Such occasional results fall far shortof compensatingthepalpa- ~lmighty God, our heavenly Father, we approach Theein the ble evils ~barged to the ~c<:m?-t of ~nsts ana monopolies. Their attitude of prayer and devotion because ~e believe in Thee as not tendency IS to crush out mdiVIdual mdependence and to hinder or only_ the creator an~ upholder of all thmgs but that Thou dost .prevent the free use of human faculties and the f ull development presideover the destiny of men and of nations.
    [Show full text]