DOCSLIB.ORG

“Development of an Application for Organising Cultural Meetings”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“Development of an Application for Organising Cultural Meetings” University Degree in Informatics Engineering Academic Year 2018-2019 Bachelor Thesis “Development of an application for organising cultural meetings” Chengyi Fu Tutor/s Jose Antonio Iglesias Martínez Leganés, September 23rd, 2019 [Include this code in case you want your Bachelor Thesis published in Open Access University Repository] This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial – Non Derivatives SUMMARY For the purpose of this bachelor thesis, it has been developed an application in the Android platform to offer the users an easier way to assist to events and meet new people, in the world of the culture. The application consists of a single module, which allows the users to share an event, join a group of users to meet new people and assist together to the event, and to share their experience about an event. A study of the culture in Spain, and more specifically in Madrid, will be included in the document, stating the reasons behind the choice of developing the application mentioned. There will be a section that explains the studies done about the mobile devices, the mobile operating systems, comparing the most relevant ones currently and reasoning the chosen system for the development. The developing process of the application will also be described in the document, alongside the testing results and the conclusions acquired. INDEX CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Regulatory framework ....................................................................................... 2 1.4 Socio-economic aspects ..................................................................................... 4 1.5 Structure of the document ................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER 2: STATE OF ART .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Mobile devices and their operating system ...................................................... 6 2.1.1 Mobile devices history ................................................................................ 6 2.1.2 Mobile operating systems .......................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Why Android? ............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Consumption of culture in Spain ....................................................................... 9 2.2.4 Financial analysis ........................................................................................ 9 2.2.5 Level of studies ......................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 3: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ......................................................................... 14 3.1 Requirements ................................................................................................... 14 The system must comply several requirements, classified in two categories: ...... 14 3.1.1 Functional requirements .......................................................................... 14 3.1.2 Non-Functional requirements .................................................................. 19 3.2 Use cases .......................................................................................................... 22 3.2.3 Diagram .................................................................................................... 22 3.2.4 Table description ...................................................................................... 22 3.3 Architecture ..................................................................................................... 29 CHAPTER 4: DESIGNING OF THE TECHNICAL SOLUTION .......................................... 31 4.1 Introduction to the system .............................................................................. 31 4.2 Firebase setup .................................................................................................. 34 4.3 Login ................................................................................................................. 35 4.3.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 35 4.3.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 37 4.4 Sign-up ............................................................................................................. 39 4.4.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 39 4.4.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 41 4.5 List of events .................................................................................................... 43 4.5.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 43 4.5.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 44 4.6 Add event ......................................................................................................... 47 4.6.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 47 4.6.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 48 4.7 Event’s details .................................................................................................. 49 4.7.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 49 4.7.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 50 4.8 Edit event ......................................................................................................... 53 4.8.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 53 4.8.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 53 4.9 Add group ........................................................................................................ 53 4.9.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 53 4.9.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 54 4.10 Group detail ..................................................................................................... 55 4.10.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 55 4.10.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 57 4.11 User’s profile .................................................................................................... 59 4.11.1 Functionality ............................................................................................. 59 4.11.2 Implementation in Android Studio ........................................................... 62 CHAPTER 5: TEST AND RESULTS ................................................................................ 64 5.1 Evaluation and survey ...................................................................................... 64 5.2 Results .............................................................................................................. 66 CHAPTER 6: PROJECT MANAGEMENT ...................................................................... 71 6.1 Planning ........................................................................................................... 71 6.2 Budget .............................................................................................................. 73 6.2.1 Human resources cost .............................................................................. 73 6.2.2 Resources and material cost .................................................................... 73 6.2.3 Total budget.............................................................................................. 74 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK ..................................................... 75 7.1 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 75 7.2 Future work ...................................................................................................... 75 BIBLIOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................... 77 FIGURES INDEX Figure 1: Culture taxes in Spain ..................................................................................... 10 Figure 2: Culture consumption from 2007-17 ................................................................ 11 Figure 3: Annual assistance by income and level of studies .......................................... 12 Figure 4: Use cases diagram ........................................................................................... 22 Figure 5: Components diagram ...................................................................................... 29 Figure 6: Login activity .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Project Scheduling & Costing Управление На Времето И
    Highware Classics in Bulgaria Класиките на Highware в България Project Scheduling & Costing Управление на времето и разходите при изпълнение на проекти Project Risk Engineering Управление на риска при изпълнение на проекти www.bg.highware.info Highware Ltd Проджекта ООД 6 Newbury Street – Wantage - Oxfordshire OX12 8BS ул. Веслец 45, 1202, София +44 (0)1865 58 99 54 +3592 9835324 company number 03297786 ЕИК номер 131231853 PROJECT SCHEDULING & COSTING Competencies Target audience Achieving results Managers, engineers or scientists with budgetary Optimising resources and scheduling responsibilities in a project. Organisation, planning and control Prerequisite DURATION: 3 days Prior education in project engineering or professional exposure to project management. Objectives To become familiar with techniques in use for project time and cost management (and espacially as implemented in project scheduling software as OpenProj, GanttProject or Microsoft-Project). FEATURES Terminology used in this course complies with PM BoK (Project Management Body of Knowledge published by Project Management Institute). Techniques presented in this course are implemented in project management software tools. Practices presented in this course are consistent with PRINCE2 (Projects IN Controled Environments) published by the OGC (Office of Government Commerce). CONTENTS Construction of project schedule Time analysis Construction of project network diagram using PERT-CPM and the negative float. different types of links (finish-to-start, Application with software tools (GanttProject, start-to-start, finish-to-finish, start-to-finish). OpenProj, Microsoft Project). Resource analysis Earned Value Management Resource and budget estimates. Cost control standard criteria: PV (Planned Resource histograms and the S-curve: Value), AC (Actual Cost) and EV (Earned Value). application with software tools (GanttProject, Case study: integration of time and cost OpenProj, Microsoft Project).
    [Show full text]
  • Hoplite Final Project Report
    Hoplite Final Project Report Lizzy Hamaoka, Reese Pearsall, Kyle Webster Spring Semester 2020 1 Introduction We propose creating an automated reporting system that will generate re- ports based on pass or fail tests. Reports will be generated based upon the defined criteria of the Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) that will serve as a guideline for compliance. The system will generate reports for Hoplite's customers' security systems for third party auditors, the managers of Hoplite's customers, as well as Hoplite Industries. The format of the report will be split into sections that include: the STIG id and respective severity level followed by the control, description, criteria of the specified STIG, and lastly the output. Hoplite's primary requirements for this project are that the system is de- ployable on Windows and Linux systems with a focus on Linux, customers can adjust the scripts for local customization, and that the product can be run ef- ficiently to allow being scalable to large systems. The software requirements involve utilizing python scripts, bash scripts, SQL databases, and other third party software that utilizes approved licenses. There is a large market for the application being built outside of the Department of Defense and the product will potentially be shipped within the next 12 months. 1 Elizabeth Hamaoka 503.267.5664 | [email protected] EDUCATION Bachelor of Science in Computer Science (Interdisciplinary Option) (GPA: 3.71) Minor in Computer Engineering Montana State University | Bozeman, MT
    [Show full text]
  • Trabajo Fin De Grado
    GRADO EN INGENIERÍA INFORMÁTICA DE GESTIÓN Y SISTEMAS DE INFORMACIÓN TRABAJO FIN DE GRADO CONTRIBUCIONES A UN PROYECTO OPEN SOURCE DE ÁMBITO INTERNACIONAL: GANTTPROJECT Alumno/Alumna: Albizuri, Silguero, Oihane Director/Directora: Pereira, Varela, Juanan Curso: 2019-2020 Fecha: Bilbao, 18, Junio, 2020 Resumen Castellano Durante este proyecto se ha estudiado c´omocontribuir a una aplicaci´on de software libre examinando su c´odigo,arquitectura y posibles issues, as´ı como el arreglo de bugs e implementaci´onde nuevas funcionalidades. Para ello, se ha estudiado cada caso, dise~nadoalternativas v´alidasy funcionales, implementado, testeado y documentado, para finalmente ser defendido como proyecto en el trabajo de fin de grado. Euskara Proiektu honen garapenan zehar software libreko aplikazio batean ekar- penak nola egiten diren ikasi da. Bereziki, kodea, arkitektura eta ager daitez- ken issue-ak ikertu, bug-ak konpondu eta funtzionalitate berrien inplemen- tazioa jorratu dira. Horretarako, kasuak banaka-banaka aztertu, hautabide egoki eta baliagarriak diseinatu dira, inplementatu, testeatu eta dokumen- tatu dira, azkenik gradu amaierako lan gisa aldeztu ahal izateko. English In the course of this project we will look at how to contribute to an open source software application; analyzing its code, architecture and the possi- ble issues the project has, bug fixing and implementing new functionalities. Each issue was evaluated individually and offered a valid and functional al- ternative or fix. Each fix was also implemented, tested and documented in the memory of this degree's thesis. i ii Prefacio El proyecto para contribuir en aplicaciones de software libre surge con el objetivo de introducir estudiantes de ingenier´ıainform´aticaen un proyecto ((real)) fuera del ´ambito acad´emico,de tal manera que dichos estudiantes puedan compartir su conocimientos con el resto de alumnos y aprender a defender sus acciones frente a programadores experimentados.
    [Show full text]
  • Many-Objective Software Remodularization Using NSGA-III
    Many-Objective Software Remodularization using NSGA-III WIEM MKAOUER, University of Michigan, Dearborn MAROUANE KESSENTINI, University of Michigan, Dearborn To cite this paper: ADNAN SHAOUT, University of Michigan, Dearborn Mkaouer, Wiem, Marouane Kessentini, Adnan Shaout, Patrice Koligheu, Slim PATRICE KONTCHOU, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bechikh, Kalyanmoy Deb, and Ali Ouni. "Many-objective software SLIM BECHIKH, University of Michigan, Dearborn remodularization using NSGA-III." ACM Transactions on Software KALYANMOY DEB, Michigan State University Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 24, no. 3 (2015): 1-45. ALI OUNI, University of Michigan, Dearborn Abstract. Software systems nowadays are complex and difficult to maintain due to continuous changes and bad design choices. To handle the complexity of systems, software products are, in general, decomposed in terms of packages/modules containing classes that are dependent. However, it is challenging to automatically remodularize systems to improve their maintainability. The majority of existing remodularization work mainly satisfy one objective which is improving the structure of packages by optimizing coupling and cohesion. In addition, most of existing studies are limited to only few operation types such as move class and split packages. Many other objectives, such as the design semantics, reducing the number of changes and maximizing the consistency with development change history, are important to improve the quality of the software by remodularizing it. In this paper, we propose a novel many-objective search-based approach using NSGA-III. The process aims at finding the optimal remodularization solutions that improve the structure of packages, minimize the number of changes, preserve semantics coherence, and re-use the history of changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gantt Software Mac
    Gantt software mac GanttProject. Free project scheduling and management app for Windows, OSX and Linux. Download new. GanttProject Release Build. published PERT chart for read-only view can be generated from the Gantt chart.​Download GanttProject · ​Get Support · ​Make it Better · ​About. Microsoft Project is only built for Windows. But Mac users have options. Discover the 10 features you need when choosing project management software. Our online gantt chart software can help plan your projects in minutes. Try our intuitive gantt chart creator to make project scheduling & management simple. Brand new for OmniPlan in iOS 11, Drag and Drop support is simple, but advanced: drag to or from the OmniPlan Gantt chart from other supporting apps to. Are you on the hunt for project management software for Mac? iTask is based around Waterfall project management–it runs off Gantt charts. GanttPRO is free online Gantt chart software for project management. Whether you are looking for a Gantt chart for Mac or Windows, you can take advantage. Looking for a project management option with robust Gantt chart software? Here's a Operating System(s): Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, Online. Merlin is a fairly user-friendly tool for making Gantt charts. It's commercial software, so it is going to set you back. The interface is a clean "Mac". FastTrack offers software that is available for both Mac OS X and . tools; Task management; Gantt Charts; Scheduling; Timelines; Milestones. Description. GanttProject is a project scheduling application written in Java and featuring Gantt chart, resource management, calendaring. Nowadays all Project Management software offer Gantt Charts and this makes As I am on Mac, unfortunately I cannot use Microsoft Project easily, so I have.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Gant Project, Orange Scrum, and Projeqtor Open Source Project Management Tools Using QSOS
    Evaluating Gant Project, Orange Scrum, and ProjeQtOr Open Source Project Management Tools using QSOS Catarina Romão Proença1a and Jorge Bernardino1,2 b 1Polytechnic of Coimbra – ISEC, Rua Pedro Nunes, Quinta da Nora, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal 2CISUC - Centre of Informatics and Systems of University of Coimbra, Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal Keywords: Open Source Software, Project Management Tools, Qualification and Selection of Open Source Software, Assessment Methodologies, Gantt Project, Orange Scrum, ProjeQtOr. Abstract: The task of managing a software project is an extremely complex job, drawing on many personal, team, and organizational resources. We realized that exist many project management tools and software being developed every day to help managers to automate the administration of individual projects or groups of projects during their life-cycle. Therefore, it is important to identify the software functionalities and compare them to the intended requirements of the company, to select which software complements the expectations. This paper presents a comparison between three of the most popular open source project management tools: Gantt Project, OrangeScrum, ProjeQtOr. To assess these project management tools is used the Qualification and Selection Open Source (QSOS) methodology. 1 INTRODUCTION differentiates between numerous candidates to meet technical, functional and strategic requirements. For Managing projects involving different groups of such we apply the Qualification and Selection Open people and complex tasks can be challenging. The Source (QSOS) methodology to the open source solution is to use project management software, project management tools. The QSOS methodology which allows more efficient management of projects. describes a formal process to evaluate, compare and Today, there is a large amount of available project select open source solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience Finding MS Project Alternatives at CERN
    EPJ Web of Conferences 245, 08017 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202024508017 CHEP 2019 Experience Finding MS Project Alternatives at CERN Maria Alandes Pradillo1, Pete Jones1, and Piotr Jan Seweryn1;∗ 1European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) Abstract. As of March 2019, CERN is no longer eligible for academic licences of Microsoft products. For this reason, CERN IT started a series of task forces to respond to the evolving requirements of the user community with the goal of reducing as much as possible the need for Microsoft licensed software. This exercise was an opportunity to understand better the user requirements for dif- ferent types of applications. Here we focus on MS Project, the dominant PC- based project management software, which has been used at CERN for many years. There were over 1,500 installations at CERN when the task force started, with a heterogeneous pool of users in terms of required functionality, area of work and expertise. This paper will present an evaluation of users’ needs and whether they could be fulfilled with cheaper and less advanced solutions for project management and scheduling. Moreover, selected alternatives, their de- ployment and lessons learned will be described in more detail. Finally, it will present the approach on how to communicate, train and migrate users to the proposed solutions. 1 Introduction As of March 2019, CERN is no longer eligible for academic licences of Microsoft products. Since 2018, CERN’s Information Technology Department has started a set of internal task forces, the so called MALT project, to understand better what other alternatives are available on the market for all the existing Microsoft applications used at CERN.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Project Management Tools Assessment Using QSOS Methodology
    Open Source Project Management Tools Assessment using QSOS Methodology Anabela Carreira1 and Jorge Bernardino1,2 a 1Polytechnic of Coimbra – ISEC, Rua Pedro Nunes, Quinta da Nora, 3030-199 Coimbra, Portugal 2CISUC - Centre of Informatics and Systems of University of Coimbra, Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal Keywords: Open Source Software, Project Management, Methodologies for Evaluating Open Source Software, Software Open Source, OSMM, QSOS, OpenBQR. Abstract: With the increasing expansion of the open source tools in our daily life it is crucial to realize which are the best tools of the immensity that exist. In order to compare open source management tools, it is recommended to use a methodology such as QSOS that help to evaluate and choose which tool best suits our objectives. This paper describes some of the most commonly used open source project management tools such as GanttProject, OpenProject, and ProjectLibre and then compares them using QSOS methodology. 1 INTRODUCTION lysis between some of the most used open source tools in project management such as the GanttProject, Many of the projects nowadays continue to fail either OpenProject, and ProjectLibre tools. We use the because they are not delivered within the set deadline, QSOS methodology that allows this comparison to be or because they are not within the stipulated budget. made by assigning evaluations to each tool. The main reason for these problems is that "best The rest of this paper is structured as follows. practices" for project management continue to be Section 2 describes each one of the tools, explaining adopted, as the project management knowledge guide what the functionalities, strengths and weaknesses of PMBOK suggests (PMBOK, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Approach to Project Management Tools
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Papers in Economics 196 Informatica Economică vol. 15, no. 1/2011 Open Source Approach to Project Management Tools Romeo MARGEA, Camelia MARGEA, West University of Timisoara, Romania Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, [email protected], [email protected] Managing large projects involving different groups of people and complex tasks can be challenging. The solution is to use Project management software, which allows a more efficient management of projects. However, famous project management systems can be costly and may require expensive custom servers. Even if free software is not as complex as Microsoft Project, is noteworthy to think that not all projects need all the features, amenities and power of such systems. There are free and open source software alternatives that meet the needs of most projects, and that allow Web access based on different platforms and locations. A starting stage in adopting an OSS in-house is finding and identifying existing open source solution. In this paper we present an overview of Open Source Project Management Software (OSPMS) based on articles, reviews, books and developers’ web sites, about those that seem to be the most popular software in this category. Keywords: Project Management Software, Microsoft Project alternatives, Open Source Project Management Software Introduction you are faced with many tasks, each with its 1 For some decades past the project own deadline for completion. PM requires management (PM) detached from standard the manager to be on alert all the time.
    [Show full text]
  • UNAD. Escuela De Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología E Ingeniería. Programa De Ingeniería Industrial
    Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia - UNAD. Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e Ingeniería. Programa de Ingeniería Industrial. ESTUDIO COMPARATIVO ENTRE EL USO DE SOFTWARE LIBRE (FREE SOFTWARE) Y SOFTWARE PROPIETARIO (MICROSOFT PROJECT) PARA LA ENSEÑANZA DE LOS CURSOS DE ADMINISTRACIÓN DE PROYECTOS EN INSTITUCIONES DE EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR. Por: Luis Enrique García Saucedo Director/Asesor: Ph.D. Ronald Rojas Alvarado Jurado: M. Eng. Víctor Hugo Rodríguez Sánchez Trabajo Dirigido de Grado como requisito para optar al título de Ingeniero Industrial. Palmira, Valle del Cauca, Colombia 10 de mayo de 2019 NOTA DE ACEPTACIÓN ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________ _____________________________________ Director/Asesor: Ph.D. Ronald Rojas Alvarado _____________________________________ Jurado: M. Eng. Víctor Hugo Rodríguez Sánchez Palmira, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. 10 de mayo de 2019. Agradecimientos Agradezco de todo corazón a mi madre, Carmen Saucedo por todo el cariño, el apoyo y el acompañamiento ofrecido durante el desarrollo de mi formación académica en la Universidad. Agradezco sinceramente al director de la monografía, Ph.D. Ronald Rojas Alvarado por su buena voluntad, sus observaciones, recomendaciones, sugerencias, correcciones y orientaciones en la composición de este trabajo y el desarrollo del mismo. Agradezco a los tutores de la Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e Ingeniería que aportaron a mi formación profesional. R.A.E Documento Monografía Titulo Software libre (free software) vs propietario (microsoft project). Estudio comparativo para administración de proyectos (project management) y sus ventajas de aprendizaje y apropiación de conocimiento. Autor Luis Enrique García Saucedo Año 2019 Palabras clave Software libre (free software), software propietario, administración de proyectos (Project Management), Microsoft Project (MS-Project), Gestión de proyectos, Diagramas de Gantt, Diagramas PERT.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Tools Assessment of Software Project Management
    IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, VOL.16 No.1, January 2016 31 Software Project Management: Tools assessment, Comparison and suggestions for future development. Muhammad Sajad† & Muhammad Sadiq† CRIDS (Center for Research in Distributed and Supercomputing) RIU. Khawar Naveed††† & Muhammad Shahid Iqbal†† CRIDS (Center for Research in Distributed and Supercomputing) RIU †††. School of Computer Science, Anhui University, Hefei, China ††. Abstract project management tools and find that Microsoft Project Software engineering is concerned with the development and is widely used for project management. In same manner advancement of huge and multiple software intensive systems. It the study of Joo Tan et. al. [1] regarding the web based shelters theories, methods and tools for the specification, project management tools in which they define the criteria architecture, design, testing, and maintenance of software on the basis of affordability, accessibility and usage of the systems. Today’s development of software systems are tools, they define only the feature of the tools and significantly large, complex and critical, that only through the use of automated approaches can such systems be developed and compare them on the basis of defined criteria. But our evolve in an economic and timely manner. While using approach is little different from those studies, we choose automated software tools which is vital for successful planning those tools for the assessment which are most common in and managing of projects. There are many automated software literature. To find the features of every tool and also tools which have been developed for different purposes in explain the features of the existing IEEE standard of different situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Project Scheduling Software for Mac
    Best Project Scheduling Software For Mac Regen repeopling his sidesman martyrising painlessly, but open-letter Maxwell never reburied so inopportunely. Distraught Allie exhausts, his Niven sherardizes remint needily. Mickie intends sinfully. Open multiple project management software for classic agile or hyprid project management task management Gantt charts boards team collaboration. They grow to be used by using an overview of who are well as little in percentage of incitement of its automatic calculation which one? Reviews on web-based Windows Mac iOS and Android systems. Unlike traditional project views means a family or items onto the. With macs in for mac? PM Software and Tools Mosaic Projects. Advanced Download Technology: Multiple download; Background download; Download resume; Download stability. What direction the best personal project manager software for Mac. Clarizen has robust scalable PM software tool on Android iOS. Why is that offers you might not designed and scheduling software project for best. Podio workspaces and the ability to quickly make adjustments. Such software helps businesses implement and execute multiple projects within the required time frame. This software project for mac and. Fight against the best alternatives. Thank you are a web app also, faster and then allows project scheduling? Comment on schedule is best part of scheduling that monday is used in by setting up to integrate social networking utilities into projects. Microsoft project accounting, including the right from different mac users on mac project software for best project and a checklist is here is. Sign up for a free plan or trial. What is your team size? Merlin Project for Mac Download Project Management.
    [Show full text]