Al-Sanhuri and Islamic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Al-Sanhuri and Islamic Law: The Place and Significance of Islamic Law in the Life and Work of 'Abd al-Razzaq Ahmad al-Sanhuri, Egyptian Jurist and Scholar, 1895-1971 [Part II] Author(s): Enid Hill Source: Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 2 (May, 1988), pp. 182-218 Published by: BRILL Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3381872 . Accessed: 19/09/2013 09:50 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Arab Law Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:50:31 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions AL-SANHURI AND ISLAMIC LAW The Place and Significanceof IslamicLaw in the Life and Workof Abd al- RazzagAhmad al-Sanhuri Egyptian Jurist and Scholar18991971*t EnidHill: VII. THE NEW EGYPTIAN CIVIL CODE I)rafting,Opposition and Consensus A committee to revisethe EgyptianCivil Code was formedin March1936, and al- Sanhuriwas appointedto it. The ostensiblereason for establishingthe committeewas recognitionof the necessityof unifying and accordinglyrevising- the two existing civil codesin anticipationof the end of the MixedCourts in 1949and theirabsorption into one nationalcourt syseem. This committeewas, however,disbanded after three monthsfor reasonsthat were "not entirelyclear", after it had adoptedthe few pre- liminaryprinciples that formed the first four articlesof the code (Ziadeh)(1968), pp. 137>141). A secondcommittee was formedin November1936 which set out rulesgoverning guaranteesand shufa (pre-emption).This committeewas also dissolved- in May 1938 beforefinishing its work. A thirdcommittee was formedin late 1938,limited to al-Sanhuriand Lambert,whom al-Sanhuri had brought into the projectpursuant to the opinion of the Ministryof Justice that the codificationwould "best be accom- plishedby two individuals>'in its first stages. An accountof the work of the com- mitteeis contailledin a seven-volumepublication of the Ministryof Justice:al-Qanun al-madani:Majmu'at al-'mal al-tahdiriya, (n.d.-probably 1949)pp. 5-9 and passim (See Ziadeh,p. 141). On 24 April 1942the completionof the draftwas publicly announced by al-Sanhuri at a lecturegiven underthe auspicesof the RoyalGeographic Society where he sum- marisedthe work on the Code and opened the matterfor public discussion(al- Sanhuri,1942)* The draftcode, he said, had been constructedusing comparisonsof morethan 20 moderncodesn the jurisprudenceof the Egyptiancourts) and the Islamic Sharina(Ziadeh, (1968)) p. 142)* The draftcode was to be open for commentfor threeyears. In 1945a committeeof five headedby al-Sanhuristudied the commentsand proposals, made some revisions, andprepared a draftfor submissionto the legislature.A specialSenate comrnittee was createdto study the draftcode (p. 143). * Copyright( 1987The AmericanUniversity in CairoPress and reprintedhere by permissionof the publisher.From Csiro Papers in Social Science, Volume 10, Monograph1, Spring1987 t The firstpart of this articleappeared in [1988]ALQ 33. t This study would nol have been possibIewithout the variousforms of help and encouragementI receivedfrom many people. 182 This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:50:31 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions AL-SANHURI AND ISLAMIC LAW 183 On 30 May 1948the Senatecommittee began a specialsession and invited members of the Egyptiancourts, the Bar Association,and membersof the law facultyof Cairo University.Reports say that al-Sanhuriwas "single-minded"in defendinghis code and counteringopposition, in the courseof whichhe "demonstrateda trulyphenome- nal knowledge of both the Shan'a and comparativejurisprudence", and that the oppositionin the Senatewas "ephemeral"(p. 144). Ephemeralor not, "the question of the utilisationof the Shari'a . occupied a sizeablepart of the committee'stime" (p. 145). A specialissue of al-Muhamah(the journalof the Egyptianbar Association)in March1948, containing"a bitterattack" on the proposedcode, had been circulatedamong the membersof the Senatecom- mittee. The journal'scriticisms were endorsed by membersof the Courtof Cassation, includingHasan al-Hudaybi (who laterbecame head of the MuslimBrethren follow- ing Hasanal-Banna's death) and one, MuhammadSadiq Fahmi, who had beeninstru- mentalin formingthe oppositiongroup of mainlyAzhari professors and in circulating the journalamong the Senatecommittee members. He was also chief spokesmanfor the oppositionin the committeehearings. Ziadeh has summarisedthe attackof this groupon the draftcode: On the one hand, it was maintained that the old code, which, with some exceptions, had been based on French law, was in need only of some modificaiion here and there, and that it was only right and proper to preserve the "legal culture" already occurring to Egypt. On the other hand, it was maintained that should a complete recodification be allowed, such recodification should be based on the Shari'a.(p. 143) "The chargesseem inconsistent",comments Ziadeh, and explainsthis inconsistency by the fact that the oppositiongroup was composedboth of secularlawyers trained in the Frenchlegal traditionand professorsof Islamiclaw at al-Azhar. One gets a sense here, however,that thereis more than meets the eye. As will be referredto in partIX, al-Sanhuricertainly had political enemies, especially among the WafdParty. It was not to be the last time thata modusvivendi for oppositionwas to be forgedbetween Wafdist politicians and membersof the MuslimBrotherhood. What is moreinteresting, however, is the contentioncontained in this statementof opposition that when and if a recodificationtook place it should be one based on the Shari'a, while a caveatwas addedby al-Hudaybithat "all legislationshould be based on the Koran"(p. 143). The call for recodificationto be "basedon the Shari'a",as well as al-Hudaybi's reservation,is a demonstrationpar excellenceof the basic differencebetween al- Sanhuri'sapproach to an islamicisationof Egyptianlaw and that of the Islamicmove- ments. The differenceis not superficial.However much the exigenciesof politicsmay bring togetherthose of a basicallysecular orietltation with the proponentsof religious revival, there cannot, it appears,be an acceptanceon the part of the latter of any approachto the revivalof Islamiclaw not basedfull-square within religion. Al-Sanhuri'sapproach was clear. The versionof his call to revisethe Codeprinted in Frenchis almostidentical with the earlierprescription in Le Califatas concernsthe way scholarlyand scientificwork should precederenovation of law in Arab Islamic states: This content downloaded from 128.111.121.42 on Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:50:31 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 184 ARABLAW QUARTERLY . energy of the rules of Islarriiclaw) must be . Thepoint of departure (to restore the original law from the temporal part. The religious part, theseparation of the religous part of Muslim the monopoly of the Muslim theologians. whichwe avoid in our examination, should remain (al-Sanhuri,(1938b), p. 623). to expresshis distinction TheArabic version, however, uses a differentphraseology meaningwith whicha Western betmreenthe religous and the secular(or temporalWa reproducedbelow, since how al- audiencehas no trouble. The Arabicversion is of the Arabiclanguage is instructive Sanhuriphrased his secularismwithin the idioms inthe contextof whathas been discussedabove. it solid scientific renovation, in order to rescue Wedo not deny that the Shari'ais in need of with the limitations to which the latter-day fromintellectual stagnation and allow it to break urlstswere tled. be based on a study of the Shan'aaccording We proposed in LeCalifal that this undertaking sludy is based on the distinction scientific method of cornparativelaw. This new tothe new the latter that it our legal (qanuniyya)rules; it is not the former but betweenreligious rules and juris- between a rule which associates religion with Islamic concernhere. We make a distinction a respected in the heart, and a rule resting on prudence,and which depends on faith and is that comes within the purview of our s<:ientific foundationof pure legal logic. It is the latter invesligations. (al-Sanhuri, ( 1936d), p. 1 13). have been more methodological The issue for the opposition,however, seems to of the Senatedebate. In the substantive,as was demonstratedduring the course than of oppositionreferred to sameissue of al-Muhamahthat containedthe statement be basedon the Shan'a, "to show above,was a "samplelaw of contract"alleged to howit could be done". derived from the Shannsand insisted that had Al-Sanhurireviewed the provisions that had been gladly done so. He then took up the sample draft itbeen possible to derive more, he would have group and demonstrated, principle by principle, ofthe law of contracts prepared by the Fahnii be based on the Shari'ait was in point of fact based that,although the sample draft purported to "that the provisions in the Sadiq sarnple on modern codes. "If it were true," he declared, draft code were Shan'a rules, then we would draft which agree with the provisions
Recommended publications
  • Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 34 Issue 1 Conference on Comparative Links between Islamic Law and the Common Law: Article 12 Cross-Cultural Interaction between Islamic Law and Other Legal Systems 1985 Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf Ian Edge University of London Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Commercial Law Commons, and the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Ian Edge, Comparative Commercial Law of Egypt and the Arabian Gulf, 34 Clev. St. L. Rev. 129 (1985-1986) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPARATIVE COMMERCIAL LAW OF EGYPT AND THE ARABIAN GULF IAN EDGE* I. INTRODUCTION ........................................ 129 II. COLONIAL RULE ....................................... 130 A. Ottoman Turkey .................................. 131 B . Egypt ............................................ 131 III. POST SECOND WORLD WAR TO 1970 ..................... 132 IV. THE DECADE OF 1970 To 1980 .......................... 134 V. FROM 1980 TO PRESENT ................................ 136 VI. MODERNIZATION OF LAW IN THE ARABIAN GULF .......... 138 A. Practice of Law ................................... 138 B . Legislation ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt and Its Laws, Edited by Natalie Bernard-Maugiron and Baudouin Dupret
    Egypt and its Laws, edited by Natalie Bernard-Maugiron and Baudouin Dupret (Assis- tant Editor Wael Rady), Kluwer Law International (Arab and Islamic Laws Series), 2002 This book, Volume 22 in the Arab and Islamic Laws Series (Series General Editor Dr Mark S. W Hoyle), published by Kluwer Law International, is an interesting collec- tion of material, enabling the reader either to dip into well-researched chapters as the fancy takes him or her, or to sit down and read through chapter by chapter, thus es- tablishing a sound basis for understanding the approach of modern Egyptian law. Given the importance of Egypt at the centre of the development and implementa- tion of legal development in the Arab world, it is hardly surprising that different authors have views of their own. The introduction (by the editors), dealing as it does with a gen- eral presentation of law and judicial bodies, has a short historical excursus into the back- ground of the present Egyptian court structure and, of course, we immediately come to one of the occasional issues in a historical analysis of Egypt, the true status of the Mixed Courts. This reviewer must immediately declare an interest, having completed his doctorate on the Mixed Courts and being a supporter of their contribution to Egypt- ian law. The statement that the mabakim wataniyya were established for Egyptian na- tionals requires qualification. Egypt had, in 1883, a curious status within the Ottoman Empire; able to reform (at a price) its own laws, but still, and despite the British Oc- cupation of 1882, nominally a part of the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Failure of Muslim Brotherhood Movement on the Scene of Government in Egypt and Its Political Future
    International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2015, 5(7): 394-406 International Journal of Asian Social Science ISSN(e): 2224-4441/ISSN(p): 2226-5139 journal homepage: http://www.aessweb.com/journals/5007 FAILURE OF MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MOVEMENT ON THE SCENE OF GOVERNMENT IN EGYPT AND ITS POLITICAL FUTURE Rasoul Goudarzi1† --- Azhdar Piri Sarmanlou2 1,2Department of International Relations, Political Science Faculty, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT After occurrence of public movements in Egypt that led the Egyptian Islamist movement of Muslim Brotherhood to come to power in ruling scene of this country, Mohamed Morsi as a candidate of this party won in the first democratic presidency elections in this country and after coming to power, he took a series of radical measures both in domestic and international scenes, which have caused him to be ousted in less than one year. The present essay is intended to reveal this fact based on theoretical framework of overthrowing government of Ibn Khaldun by proposing various reasons and documentations about several aspects of ousting of Morsi. Similarly, it indicates that with respect to removing this movement from Egypt political scene and confiscation of their properties, especially after the time when Field Marshal Abdel Fattah El-Sisi came to power as a president, so Muslim Brotherhood should pass through a very tumultuous path to return to political scene in Egypt compared to past time, especially this movement has lost noticeably its public support and backing. © 2015 AESS Publications. All Rights Reserved. Keywords: Muslim brotherhood, Army, Egypt, Political situation. Contribution/ Originality The paper's primary contribution is study of Mohamed Morsi‟s radical measures both in domestic and international scenes in Egypt, which have caused him to be ousted in less than one year.
    [Show full text]
  • WENA HOTELS LTD. V. ARAB REPUBLIC of EGYPT (PROCEEDING on the MERITS)" [December 8, 2000] +Cite As 41 ILM 896 (2002)+
    INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID): WENA HOTELS LTD. V. ARAB REPUBLIC OF EGYPT (PROCEEDING ON THE MERITS)" [December 8, 2000] +Cite as 41 ILM 896 (2002)+ INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Washington, D.C. Wena Hotels Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt Case No. ARB/98/4 AWARD President: Monroe LEIGH, Esq. Members of the Tribunal: Prof. Ibrahim FADLALLAH Prof. Don. WALLACE, Jr. Secretary of the Tribunal: Mr. Alejandro A. ESCOBAR In Case No. ARB/98/4 between Wena Hotels Limited, represented by Mr. Emmanuel Gailliard; Mr. John Savage; and Mr. Peter Griffin of the Law Firm Shearman & Sterling and The Arab Republic of Egypt, represented by Mr. Eric A. Schwartz and Mr. Simon B. Stebbings of the Law Firm of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; and Counselor Osama Ahmed Mahmoud, and <,:ounselor Hussein Mostafa Fathi from the Egyptian State Lawsuits Authority THE TRIBUNAL, Composed as above, Makes the following Award: This document was reproduced and reformatted from the hard copy provide by Shearman and Sterling. HeinOnline -- 41 Int''l Legal Materials 896 (2002) 2002] ICSID: WENA V. EGYPT (PROCEEDING ON THE MERITS) 897 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The Proceedings ................................................................................................................. [ILM Page 898] II. The Facts ............................................................................................................................. [ILM Page 900] A. U.K.-Egypt Agreement for the Promotion and Protection of Investments .......... [ILM Page 900] B. Luxor and Nile Hotel Agreements ....................................................................... .. [ILM Page 901] C. Events Leading up to the April 1, 1991 Seizures ................................................. [ILM Page 901] D. Seizures of the Nile and Luxor Hotels (April 1, 1991) ......................................... [lLM Page 902] 1. Decision to Seize the Hotels .................................................................... [ILM Page 902] 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limited Impact of the USA on Political Liberalization in Egypt During the Mubarak Era
    The Limited Impact of the USA on Political Liberalization in Egypt during the Mubarak Era Müge Aknur *, Erkan Okalan † Abstract: Among all authoritarian Arab regimes in the Middle Eastern and North African region, Egypt can be considered as a crucial example which has attempted to take a number of steps toward political liberalization since the 1970s. As an external actor through its aid programs, bilateral agreements, direct grant programs, and partnership initiatives, the United States seemed to be working towards economic and political liberalization and democratization in Egypt. However, in spite of this seemingly fervent endeavor, particularly during the rule of President Mubarak, the US governments have failed in their attempts to liberalize Egypt. This article attempts to explain why the USA was not able to succeed in its initiatives to liberalize Egypt, despite its serious economic assistances and political efforts by referring to two research traditions within comparative politics: structuralist analysis and rational choice theory. It argues that the USA, due to the problems concerning the structure of USAID, MEPI and BMENA, and the rational choices made by the same organizations had a limited impact on political liberalization process in Egypt. Keywords: Egyptian politics, political liberalization, external actors, the United States of America (USA), structural analysis, rational choice * Assist. Prof., Dokuz Eylül University, Department of International Relations † Master student, Dokuz Eylül University, Department of International Relations ALTERNATIVES TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS www.alternetivesjournal.net The Limited Impact of the USA on Political Liberalization in Egypt during the Mubarak Era Introduction Since the rule of President Anwar Sadat in the 1970s, Egypt has passed through a series of political liberalization attempts.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Asian Meeting In
    DIVISION FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS UNITED NATIONS SEMINAR ON ASSISTANCE TO THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE Cairo 10-11 March 2009 2 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction …………………………………………………………. 1-4 3 II. Opening session ….…………….……………………………………. 5-30 3 III. Plenary sessions ......…………………………………………………. 31-69 8 Plenary I …………………………………………………………...... 31-44 8 Plenary II ……………………………………………………………. 45-57 11 Plenary III …………………………………………………………… 58-69 14 IV. Closing session ……………………………………………………… 70-76 16 Annex List of participants ………………………………………………………………....... 19 3 I. Introduction 1. The United Nations Seminar on Assistance to the Palestinian People was held in Cairo on 10 and 11 March 2009, under the auspices of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People and in keeping with the provisions of General Assembly resolutions 63/26 and 63/27 of 26 November 2008. 2. The Committee was represented by a delegation comprising Paul Badji (Senegal), Chairman of the Committee; Zahir Tanin (Afghanistan), Vice-Chairman of the Committee; Saviour Borg (Malta), Rapporteur of the Committee; Angel Dalmau Férnandez, Ambassador of Cuba to Egypt, representing Cuba as the Vice-Chairman of the Committee; and Riyad Mansour (Palestine). 3. The Meeting consisted of an opening session, three plenary sessions and a closing session. The themes of the plenary sessions were “Current situation in the Gaza Strip”, “Looking ahead: identifying the most urgent humanitarian, reconstruction and development needs” and “Coordination of international efforts to provide relief and promote reconstruction”. 4. During these sessions presentations were made by 17 experts. Representatives of 68 Governments, Palestine, the Holy See, 5 intergovernmental organizations, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 13 United Nations bodies, 15 civil society organizations and 33 representatives of the media participated.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Politics in Alexandria | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 599 Religion and Politics in Alexandria Feb 1, 2002 Brief Analysis n January 20-21, an interfaith summit of Muslim, Christian, and Israeli Jewish leaders convened in O Alexandria, Egypt, after several years of effort and planning. The meeting did not draw much attention in the Egyptian or Palestinian media -- only in the Israeli media -- but it deserves attention, if not for the religious dimension, then at least for the political. The Interfaith Summit About twenty religious scholars from the highest religious establishments of Egypt, Israel, and the Palestinian Authority (PA) met under the presidency of Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey. Egyptians in attendance included the head of Egypt's al-Azhar, Dr. Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi. Israeli representatives included Chief Sephardi Rabbi Eliyahu Bakshi-Doron, Deputy Foreign Minister Rabbi Michael Melchior, Rabbi Menachem Fruman of the Tekoa settlement in the West Bank (who had tried to create contacts between Jewish religious figures and Hamas leaders for many years), and Rabbi David Rosen (until recently the head of the Jerusalem office of the Anti- Defamation League). Palestinians included Chief Justice of the Palestinian Shari'ah courts Sheikh Taysir al-Tamimi, Mufti of Bethlehem Sheikh Tawil, PA minister of state Talal al-Sidr, and Mufti of the Palestinian police forces Sheikh Abd al-Salam Abu Shkheidem. Other leaders included Latin Patriarch Michel Sabah, Melkite Archbishop Butrous Mu`allem, Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem Riah Abu `Asal, and representatives of the Armenian and Greek Orthodox Patriarchs. Efforts to arrange such a meeting were ongoing for several years, involving, among others, senior Christian figures in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting the Genie Back in the Bottle: Ruling Regimes and the New Media in the Arab World
    D e c e m b e r 2 0 0 8 A N A L Y S I S DAVID HARDAKER Putting the Genie Back in Tel: +61 2 9427 7959 Mob: 0424 033 700 the Bottle: Ruling david@middleeastgulfconnection. com.au Regimes and the New Media in the Arab World E x e c u t i v e s u m m a r y The rapid growth of satellite television and the internet has shaken Arab governments’ traditional control over the media. This development has given unprecedented power to voices of dissent, both secular and religious. It has enabled popular participation in public debate and has given citizens the ability to mobilise mass protests. In the face of this threat to their authority, regimes have typically responded with heightened repression and censorship, in the name of stability. In some cases they have also attempted to co-opt the new media to their own advantage. However, Arab regimes are faced with competing demands: one the one hand they must ensure the take-up of communication technologies so as to keep pace with global change, but on the other hand they must limit the use of these technologies as a means of undermining regime control. In the long term, resolving this tension will only become more difficult; the genie is well and truly out of the bottle. LOWY INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL POLICY 31 Bligh Street Sydney NSW 2000 Tel: +61 2 8238 9000 Fax: +61 2 8238 9005 www.lowyinstitute.org = qÜÉ=içïó=fåëíáíìíÉ=Ñçê=fåíÉêå~íáçå~ä=mçäáÅó=áë=~å=áåÇÉéÉåÇÉåí=áåíÉêå~íáçå~ä=éçäáÅó=íÜáåâ=í~åâ= Ä~ëÉÇ=áå=póÇåÉóI=^ìëíê~äá~K==fíë=ã~åÇ~íÉ=ê~åÖÉë=~Åêçëë=~ää=íÜÉ=ÇáãÉåëáçåë=çÑ=áåíÉêå~íáçå~ä=éçäáÅó= ÇÉÄ~íÉ=áå=^ìëíê~äá~=Ô=ÉÅçåçãáÅI=éçäáíáÅ~ä=~åÇ=ëíê~íÉÖáÅ=Ô=~åÇ=áí=áë=åçí=äáãáíÉÇ=íç=~=é~êíáÅìä~ê=
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of the Caliphate Debate in Egyptian Legal Thought: Historical Analysis from 1925 to 2014
    American University in Cairo AUC Knowledge Fountain Theses and Dissertations 2-1-2015 The persistence of the caliphate debate in Egyptian legal thought: Historical analysis from 1925 to 2014 Assil Salem Follow this and additional works at: https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds Recommended Citation APA Citation Salem, A. (2015).The persistence of the caliphate debate in Egyptian legal thought: Historical analysis from 1925 to 2014 [Master’s thesis, the American University in Cairo]. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/97 MLA Citation Salem, Assil. The persistence of the caliphate debate in Egyptian legal thought: Historical analysis from 1925 to 2014. 2015. American University in Cairo, Master's thesis. AUC Knowledge Fountain. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/97 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by AUC Knowledge Fountain. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AUC Knowledge Fountain. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The American University in Cairo School of Global Affairs and Public Policy THE PERSISTENCE OF THE CALIPHATE DEBATE IN EGYPTIAN LEGAL THOUGHT: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS FROM 1925 TO 2014 A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Law in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the LL.M. Degree in International and Comparative Law By Assil Salem June 2015 The American University in Cairo School of Global Affairs and Public Policy THE PERSISTENCE OF THE CALIPHATE DEBATE IN EGYPTIAN LEGAL THOUGHT: HISTORICAL ANALYSIS FROM 1925 TO 2014 A Thesis Submitted by Assil Salem to the Department of Law June 2015 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the LL.M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Social Networks and Mobile Technologies on the Revolutions in the Arab World—A Study of Egypt and Tunisia
    Laws 2014, 3, 674–692; doi:10.3390/laws3040674 OPEN ACCESS laws ISSN 2075-471X www.mdpi.com/journal/laws/ Article The Impact of Social Networks and Mobile Technologies on the Revolutions in the Arab World—A Study of Egypt and Tunisia Alana Maurushat 1,*, Mohamed Chawki 2, Hadeel Al-Alosi 3 and Yassin el Shazly 4 1 Faculty of Law, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia 2 International Association of Cybercrime Prevention (AILCC), 1-3 rue Frédérick Lemaître, Paris 75020, France; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Faculty of Law, Humanities and Arts, The University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 College of Law, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-02-9835-8027. External Editor: Jane Bailey Received: 30 April 2014; in revised form: 9 September 2014 / Accepted: 11 September 2014 / Published: 9 October 2014 Abstract: Revolts in Tunisia and Egypt have led many observers to speak of the “first digital revolution” in the Arab world. Social media sites, such as Twitter and Facebook, are now recognised as the important tools that facilitated the “Jasmine Revolution”. In fact, the willingness of the Mubarak government to block all internet connection in Egypt has demonstrated the concern over the power of new technologies in facilitating political change. The tenacity of the social movements that are still on-going in the Arab world continues to demonstrate the important role that networked technologies—such as the internet, satellite channels and social networking sites—play in revolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Legal Theory and the Context of Islamist Movements Cynthia Shawamreh
    Volume 2 | Issue 2 Article 1 5-1-2012 Islamic Legal Theory and the Context of Islamist Movements Cynthia Shawamreh Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Shawamreh, Cynthia (2012) "Islamic Legal Theory and the Context of Islamist Movements," Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law: Vol. 2: Iss. 2, Article 1. Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndjicl/vol2/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 2 Notre Dame J. Int'l & Comp. L. 197 2011-2012 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Thu Aug 4 12:26:57 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=2325-2235 197 NOTRE DAME JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW 2012 ARTICLES ISLAMIC LEGAL THEORY AND THE CONTEXT OF ISLAMIST MOVEMENTS Cynthia Shawamreh* INTRODUCTION This article will provide an overview of classical Islamic legal theory and explore the political and economic context of modem Islamist movements in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Benefit: a Comparative Study Between Legislation and Islamic Jurisprudence
    Journal of Politics and Law; Vol. 11, No. 4; 2018 ISSN 1913-9047 E-ISSN 1913-9055 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Legal Benefit: A Comparative Study between Legislation and Islamic Jurisprudence Shams El-Din Qassem Al-Khazaleh1 1 Irbid National University, Irbid, Jordan Correspondence: Shams El-Din Qassem Al-Khazaleh, Irbid National University, Irbid, Jordan. Received: February 7, 2018 Accepted: March 14, 2018 Online Published: November 30, 2018 doi:10.5539/jpl.v11n4p102 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v11n4p102 Abstract The study dealt with the legal benefit in both: the legislations, specifically the Jordanian law, and the Islamic jurisprudence through the jurisprudence magazine. The study dealt with how to deal with the legal benefit in these legislations to reach the result of a discrepancy between these legislations and Islamic jurisprudence, it concluded that what is stated in Islamic jurisprudence is the best to apply. Results also showed the following: - the Jordanian legislator did not provide for taking it into any of the unified or dual legal systems if the work is mixed, which caused a difference in the provisions of the judiciary - The texts related to interest in Jordan are texts distributed between the Ottoman Murabaha system, the law of usury, the Jordanian trade law, the law of the Central Bank of Jordan, the Jordanian civil law and the Jordanian Code of Civil Procedure. - All of the laws referred to above allow for the application of interest except the Civil Code, as article 640 states that: "If the loan contract provides an additional benefit to the contract, it is only to document the lender's right to the condition and validity of the contract", that is, the interest rate in loans is not considered.
    [Show full text]