DOCSLIB.ORG

Forster, William Paul.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Forster, William Paul.Pdf A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Risk, modernity and the H5N1 virus in action in Indonesia A multi‐sited study of the threats of avian and human pandemic influenza William Paul Forster A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Sussex Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex January 2012 i ABSTRACT This thesis examines the Influenza A/H5N1 virus in action through an ethnographic study focused on the entwined concepts of risk and modernity. The objective is to explain why the response to the virus has been challenged in Indonesia. Concerned with policy formulation, and everyday practice, the thesis argues that assemblages of historical, political, institutional and knowledge‐power processes create multiple hybrid constructions of risk and modernity, which challenge technical responses based on epistemological positions and institutional arrangements that do not allow for such hybridity. The thesis is organised into four sections. The first section (chapters 1 – 3) introduces the virus and its terrain, outlines a constructivist position, and argues that conceptually risk and modernity have multiple, dynamic, power‐laden forms. The second section (chapters 4 – 6) contrasts constructions of risk and modernity among the actors and networks responding to the emergence, spread and persistence of the H5N1 virus, with the constructions of affected people in Indonesia. The third section (chapters 7 – 9) investigates the multi‐directional processes that occur when ‘global’ policies and practices encounter ‘local’ social and political settings, and vice versa, through three empirical case studies of the response to H5N1 in Indonesia between 2005 and 2010. The final section (chapter 10) provides a set of reflections and conclusions. Given the conceptual plurality of risk and modernity, and the multiple overlapping interacting hybrid constructions that have been empirically demonstrated in the case of H5N1, it is concluded that reductive, science‐based, governmentally‐orientated responses which treat nature as a matter of separate, fixed identity do not allow for such hybridity. The virus in action in Indonesia shows that any divide between nature and society is artificial and deceiving. Technical disease control responses need to incorporate understandings which accept the dynamics of culture, politics, and power. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Particular thanks are due to my supervisors, Ian Scoones and Melissa Leach, at the Institute of Development Studies STEPS Centre, and the UK’s Economic and Social Research Council, which funded my studentship and fieldwork in Indonesia. Beyond that, a large number of people have encouraged and supported me in various ways. Specifically I would like thank: Emil Agustiono, Robyn Alders, Bustanul Arifin, Yana Arifin, Teresa Armijos, Abdul Azid, Warief Djajanto Basorie, Jonathan Bell, Gerry Bloom, Sally Brooks, Glenn Bruce, Eric Brum, Oliver Burch, Sigfrido Burgos, Olivier Charnoz, Ivo Classen, William Daniel, Baso Darmawan, Julia Day, Suzanna Dayne, H.S. Dillon, Angela Dowman, Sarah Dry, Harriet Dudley, Lynleigh Evans, Emmy Fitri, Bill Forster, Sheila Forster, Paul Gully, Fenni Firman Gunardi, Percy Hawkes, Heru Hendratmoko, David Heymann, Olga Jonas, Nyoman Kandun, Phemo Kgomotso, Bayu Krisnamurthi, James McGrane, Anni McLeod, Abdil Mughis, Fahrul Muzaqqi, David Nabarro, Pangeran Nasution, Joachim Otte, Mildred Piovesan‐Forster, Bugie Prasetyo, Maggie Pryer, Maya Purboputri, Iqbal Rafani, Arie Rukmantara, Jonathan Rushton, Imelda Salajan, Gina Samaan, Heru Setijanto, Mohammad Sudomo, Irene Susilo, Linnet Taylor, Ron Thornton, Marites Tiongco, Fred Unger, Anny Veradiani, Agung Wahyono, Emma Watkins, Bimo Wicaksana, Sridadi Wiryosuhanto, Erinaldi Yulizar, and Irsyad Zamjani. STATUTORY STATEMENT This thesis has not previously been submitted to Sussex University, or any other university, for a degree, in this or any other form. Signed William Paul Forster iii CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 A ‘slippery’ disease ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Thesis structure ........................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Studying the issue ....................................................................................................... 9 1.4 Why Indonesia? ......................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 20 2. Conceptual background .................................................................................................. 21 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 21 2.2 Constructing risk ....................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Globalising risk .......................................................................................................... 28 2.4 Defining modernity ................................................................................................... 32 2.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 36 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 38 3.1 Where am I coming from? ........................................................................................ 38 3.2 In the air .................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 On the ground ........................................................................................................... 45 3.4 Data analysis ............................................................................................................. 52 3.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 55 4. Global policy .................................................................................................................... 57 4.1 Global directions ....................................................................................................... 57 4.2 Politics and pandemics .............................................................................................. 61 4.3 United nations? ......................................................................................................... 65 4.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 76 5. Indonesia: cultural and political background .................................................................. 78 5.1 Ruptures and revolutions .......................................................................................... 78 5.2 Living on the volcano ................................................................................................ 81 5.3 Material modernity ................................................................................................... 86 5.4 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 91 6. Indonesia: H5N1 policy response and citizen practices .................................................. 93 6.1 Slow off the mark ...................................................................................................... 94 6.2 International influences ............................................................................................ 96 6.3 The weight of history ................................................................................................ 99 iv 6.4 Inveterate aviculturalists ........................................................................................ 101 6.5 Consumption and consumers ................................................................................. 103 6.6 Big business ............................................................................................................. 106 6.7 On the farm ............................................................................................................. 113 6.8 In the backyard........................................................................................................ 117 6.9 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 121 6.10 Introducing the case studies ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: a Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System
    Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: John O. Haley, Chair Michael E. Townsend Beth E. Rivin Program Authorized to Offer Degree School of Law © Copyright 2015 Yu Un Oppusunggu ii University of Washington Abstract Sudargo Gautama and the Development of Indonesian Public Order: A Study on the Application of Public Order Doctrine in a Pluralistic Legal System Yu Un Oppusunggu Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor John O. Haley School of Law A sweeping proviso that protects basic or fundamental interests of a legal system is known in various names – ordre public, public policy, public order, government’s interest or Vorbehaltklausel. This study focuses on the concept of Indonesian public order in private international law. It argues that Indonesia has extraordinary layers of pluralism with respect to its people, statehood and law. Indonesian history is filled with the pursuit of nationhood while protecting diversity. The legal system has been the unifying instrument for the nation. However the selected cases on public order show that the legal system still lacks in coherence. Indonesian courts have treated public order argument inconsistently. A prima facie observation may find Indonesian public order unintelligible, and the courts have gained notoriety for it. This study proposes a different perspective. It sees public order in light of Indonesia’s legal pluralism and the stages of legal development.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment
    d WORKING PAPER Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment Julia E. Tobias Global Innovation Fund, London, U.K. Sudarno Sumarto The SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia Habib Moody The Urban Institute, Washington D.C., USA WORKING PAPER Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia Julia E. Tobias Global Innovation Fund, London, U.K. Sudarno Sumarto The SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia Habib Moody The Urban Institute, Washington D.C., USA Editor: Jamie Evans (Australian Volunteers International) The SMERU Research Institute Jakarta December 2014 The findings, views, and interpretations published in this report are those of the authors and should not be attributed to any of the agencies providing financial support to The SMERU Research Institute. For further information on SMERU’s publications, phone 62-21-31936336; fax 62-21-31930850; e-mail [email protected]; or visit www.smeru.or.id. Assessing the political impacts of a conditional cash transfer evidence from a randomized policy experiment/ Julia E. Tobias et al. -- Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute, 2014 vi, 34 p. ; 30 cm. -- (SMERU Working Paper, 2014) ISBN 978-602-7901-18-6 1. conditional cash transfer I. SMERU II. Julia E. Tobias 362.57 / DDC 22 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank The SMERU Research Institute and the Frank W. Patterson fund of the Yale University Department of Political Science for financial support. We are extremely grateful to Benjamin Olken, Junko Onishi, and Susan Wong for providing access to the survey data used in the paper, and to Susan Hyde for providing data on Indonesia’s 2004 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and Indonesia Current Problems, Future Prospects Jamie Mackie Lowy Institute Paper 19
    Lowy Institute Paper 19 Australia and Indonesia CURRENT PROBLEMS, FUTURE PROSPECTS Jamie Mackie Lowy Institute Paper 19 Australia and Indonesia CURRENT PROBLEMS, FUTURE PROSPECTS Jamie Mackie First published for Lowy Institute for International Policy 2007 PO Box 102 Double Bay New South Wales 2028 Australia www.longmedia.com.au [email protected] Tel. (+61 2) 9362 8441 Lowy Institute for International Policy © 2007 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part Jamie Mackie was one of the first wave of Australians of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (including but not limited to electronic, to work in Indonesia during the 1950s. He was employed mechanical, photocopying, or recording), without the prior written permission of the as an economist in the State Planning Bureau under copyright owner. the auspices of the Colombo Plan. Since then he has been involved in teaching and learning about Indonesia Cover design by Holy Cow! Design & Advertising at the University of Melbourne, the Monash Centre of Printed and bound in Australia Typeset by Longueville Media in Esprit Book 10/13 Southeast Asian Studies, and the ANU’s Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies. After retiring in 1989 he National Library of Australia became Professor Emeritus and a Visiting Fellow in the Cataloguing-in-Publication data Indonesia Project at ANU. He was also Visiting Lecturer in the Melbourne Business School from 1996-2000. His Mackie, J. A. C. (James Austin Copland), 1924- . publications include Konfrontasi: the Indonesia-Malaysia Australia and Indonesia : current problems, future prospects.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia. Julia, Tobias and Sumarto, Sudarno and Moody, Habib The SMERU Research Institute 3 February 2014 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/59091/ MPRA Paper No. 59091, posted 05 Oct 2014 16:16 UTC WORKING PAPER Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia Julia E. Tobias Overseas Development Institute, London, UK Sudarno Sumarto SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia Habib Moody The Urban Institute, Washington DC, USA * This document has been approved for online preview but has not been through the copyediting and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the final version. Please cite this document as "draft". FEBRUARY 2014 WORKING PAPER Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia Julia E. Tobias Overseas Development Institute, London, UK Sudarno Sumarto SMERU Research Institute, Jakarta, Indonesia Habib Moody The Urban Institute, Washington DC, USA The SMERU Research Institute Jakarta February 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the SMERU Research Institute and the Frank W. Patterson fund of the Yale University Department of Political Science for financial support. We are extremely grateful to Benjamin Olken, Junko Onishi, and Susan Wong for providing access to the survey data used in the paper, and to Susan Hyde for providing data on Indonesia’s 2004 Presidential election. The SMERU Research Institute i ABSTRACT Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia Julia E.
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions to Employment of Young People in Indonesia
    Transitions to employment of young people in Indonesia Reiko Okumura (Reiko Okumura-Rougeaux) September 2019 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University © Copyright by Reiko Okumura 2019 All Rights Reserved ii Declaration This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university. To the best of the author’s knowledge, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text. Reiko Okumura September 2019 iii iv Acknowledgements This PhD journey was a long and enormous challenge but also a rewarding experience for me. I was able to complete this thesis because of the massive support received from my family and friends, particularly my husband who has been helping and encouraging me tremendously throughout this endless-feeling journey. I am indebted to my daughter and son, both of whom were born during my PhD candidature, due to my prolonged absences for day and night writing at home and office. I would like to thank my supervisors and panel members. My panel chair was Professor James Raymer who tirelessly provided me with valuable comments and advice. I have learned a lot from his research commitments and generous support to my research and other students. My sincere gratitude to Dr Ariane Utomo with whom I started this long journey. She always provided so much useful advice from different perspectives. Without her warm support professionally and personally, sharing how to manage this challenging journey as a researcher, wife and mother, I would not have been able to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism in Southeast Asia
    Order Code RL31672 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Terrorism in Southeast Asia Updated February 7, 2005 Bruce Vaughn, Coordinator, Emma Chanlett-Avery, Richard Cronin, Mark Manyin, Larry Niksch Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Terrorism in Southeast Asia Summary Since September 2001, the United States has been concerned with radical Islamist groups in Southeast Asia, particularly those in the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore that are known to have ties to the Al Qaeda terrorist network. Southeast Asia is a base for past, current, and possibly future Al Qaeda operations. For nearly fifteen years, Al Qaeda has penetrated the region by establishing local cells, training Southeast Asians in its camps in Afghanistan, and by financing and cooperating with indigenous radical Islamist groups. Indonesia and the southern Philippines have been particularly vulnerable to penetration by anti-American Islamic terrorist groups. Members of one indigenous network, Jemaah Islamiyah (JI), with extensive ties to Al Qaeda, are known to have assisted two of the September 11, 2001 hijackers and have confessed to plotting and carrying out attacks against Western targets. These include the deadliest terrorist attack since September 2001: the October 12, 2002 bombing in Bali, Indonesia, that killed approximately 200 people, mostly Westerners. On September 9, 2004, a suicide bombing attack thought to be the work of Jemaah Islamiya struck the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, killing 10 and wounding around 200. The attack suggests that JI remains capable of carrying out relatively large-scale plots against “hard” Western targets, despite the arrest or death of hundreds of JI members, including most of its known leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Palm Expansion in Riau Province, Indonesia
    OIL PALM EXPANSION IN RIAU PROVINCE, INDONESIA : serving people, planet and profit? OIL PALM EXPANSION IN RIAU PROVINCE, INDONESIA : serving people, planet and profit? Ari Susanti, Utrecht University, Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, International Development Studies Group This thesis was written as part of the Sliding from Greasy land? Migration flows and forest transformation caused by oil palm expansion in Riau, Sumatra and East Kalimantan cluster and received financial support from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO/WOTRO) in collaboration with the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (KNAW) as part of the Agriculture beyond Food (AbF) programme. ISBN 978-94-6301-094-8 Eburon Academic Publishers P/O Box 2867 2601 CW Delft The Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)15 2131484 / Fax: +31 (0)15 2146888 [email protected] / www.eburon.nl Cover design : Riyono Nugroho Cartography : Ton Markus Figures : Margot Stoete Pictures : Ari Susanti © 2016 Ari Susanti. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the proprietor. © 2016 Ari Susanti. Alle rechten voorbehouden. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden verveelvoudigd, opgeslagen in een geautomatiseerd gegevensbestand, of openbaar gemaakt, in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, door fotokopieën, opnamen, of op enig andere manier,
    [Show full text]