DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphic Architecture and Avulsion Deposits of a Low Net- Sand Content Fluvial Succession: Lower Wasatch Formation, Uinta Basin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphic Architecture and Avulsion Deposits of a Low Net- Sand Content Fluvial Succession: Lower Wasatch Formation, Uinta Basin STRATIGRAPHIC ARCHITECTURE AND AVULSION DEPOSITS OF A LOW NET- SAND CONTENT FLUVIAL SUCCESSION: LOWER WASATCH FORMATION, UINTA BASIN by Kassandra L. Sendziak A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date _____________ Signed: ____________________________ Kassandra L. Sendziak Signed: ____________________________ Dr. David R. Pyles Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date _____________ Signed: ____________________________ Dr. John D. Humphrey Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT This study documents the stratigraphic architecture of channel and floodplain strata of low net-sand content fluvial deposits in outcrops of the lower Wasatch Formation, Desolation Canyon, Uinta Basin, Utah. The lower Wasatch Formation has a net sand-content of 0.27 and contains predominantly floodplain strata (79% in the field area). Three types of crevasse splays are recognized in this field area based on their physical relationship to adjacent channel-belt strata. Associated coeval splays are laterally adjacent and are physically connected to a channel-belt element, indicating that the crevasse splay was deposited coeval with the channel fill. Unassociated splays are spatially isolated from channel-belt elements and are interpreted to represent a failed avulsion. Associated non-coeval splays underlie the channel-belt element and are interpreted to be genetically related to the overlying channel-belt element, and therefore are a record of a successful avulsion. Three distinct types of associated non-coeval splays are identified in this study area based on physical, observable characteristics: type I, type II, and type III. A conceptual model is proposed that describes longitudinal changes in associated non-coeval splay deposits where type I, type II, and type III splay units represent proximal, medial, and distal positions in splay deposits relative to the source channel, respectively. Decreases in the following characteristics of splays occur with increased distance from the source channel: (1) thickness of splay unit, (2) thickness and abundance of splay beds, (3) net-sand content, (4) grain size, and (5) erosion. The occurrence of floodplain and channel-belt strata in a vertical transect through the outcrop are evaluated to: (1) determine whether the dominant avulsion style is aggradational or incisional, and (2) relate channel story type (i.e. downstream versus lateral accreting) to avulsion style. The correlation between the abundance of splay beds and the abundance of overlying channel-belt elements is interpreted to indicate that the succession resulted from predominantly aggradational avulsion processes. The occurrence of splay beds below channel- iii belts containing predominantly downstream-accreting stories is interpreted to indicate that these channels resulted from predominantly aggradational avulsion processes. The lack of splay beds below channel-belts containing predominantly lateral-accreting stories is interpreted to indicate that these channels resulted from predominantly incisional avulsion processes. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................III LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... VI LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 3.1 Lithofacies........................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Architectural and Hierarchical Fluvial Classification ............................................ 9 CHAPTER 4 ARCHITECTURE OF THE LOWER WASATCH FORMATION ..........................17 4.1 Channel-Belt Architecture ................................................................................. 17 4.1.1 Channel-Belt Elements ..................................................................................... 17 4.1.2 Channel-Belt Stories ......................................................................................... 18 4.2 Floodplain-Belt Architecture .............................................................................. 20 4.2.1 Floodplain-Belt Elements ...................................................................................20 4.2.2 Floodplain-Belt Stories .......................................................................................20 CHAPTER 5 CREVASSE SPLAY TYPES ..............................................................................26 CHAPTER 6 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................31 6.1 Spatially Varying Characteristics of Associated Non-Coeval Splays (i.e. Avulsion Complexes) ....................................................................................................... 31 6.2 Upward Trends: Relationship between Floodplain and Channel-Belt Elements 33 CHAPTER 7 APPLICATIONS .................................................................................................40 CHAPTER 8 FUTURE WORK ................................................................................................43 CHAPTER 9 CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................44 REFERENCES CITED ..............................................................................................................46 SUPPLEMENTAL FILES ..........................................................................................................52 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 Location map of the Uinta Basin and chronostratigraphic chart of basin fill ......... 6 Figure 2.2 Topographic map of the study area ..................................................................... 7 Figure 2.3 Photographs of the study area ............................................................................ 8 Figure 3.1 Quantitative data of the lower Wasatch Formation in the field area ....................13 Figure 3.2 Lithofacies photographs .....................................................................................14 Figure 3.3 Three-level hierarchical classification scheme ...................................................15 Figure 4.1 Examples of downstream accreting channel-belt stories and elements ..............22 Figure 4.2 Examples of laterally accreting channel-belt stories and elements .....................23 Figure 4.3 Example of crevasse channel story ....................................................................24 Figure 4.4 Examples of crevasse-splays and floodplain-fine deposits .................................25 Figure 5.1 Field example and schematic diagram of an associated coeval splay ................28 Figure 5.2 Field examples and schematic diagram of associated non-coeval splays. .........29 Figure 5.3 Field examples and schematic diagram of unassociated splays. ........................30 Figure 6.1 Field example and schematic diagram of type I splays ......................................35 Figure 6.2 Field example and schematic diagram of type II splays......................................36 Figure 6.3 Field example and schematic diagram of type III splay s ....................................37 Figure 6.4 Schematic of spatially varying characteristics of associated non-coeval splays .38 Figure 6.5 Upward trends of the lower Wasatch Formation .................................................39 Figure 7.1 Gamma Ray signatures of associated non-coeval spaly types ...........................42 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Lithofacies descriptions ......................................................................................14 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people with whom this project would not have been possible. I am particularly grateful for the guidance of my advisor Dr. David Pyles. The knowledge and enthusiasm he shares for the scientific method have made me a better scientist, geologist, and critical thinker. I would also like to thank other members of my committee: Dr. Rick Sarg, committee-chair, for his support and guidance regarding coursework, research, and my future as a geologist; Dr. Bryan Bracken, for his time in and out of the field, mentoring, and support throughout this project; and Dr. Matthew Pranter, for his guidance and encouragement. I would like to express my greatest gratitude to Grace Ford. This project would not have started nor been completed without her encouragement and extraordinary mentoring in and out of the field. I wish to acknowledge Chelsea Philippe for her assistance in getting us safely down the river and through many days in the field, I might not have survived without her. Additional field assistance from Neil Sharp is also greatly appreciated. I would like to thank other members of the CoRE team for their support throughout this project: Jane Stammer, Jeremiah Moody; Greg Gordon; Charlie Rourke, Linda Martin, and Cathy Van Tassel. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Linda and Walter Sendziak, most of all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taphonomy of the Sun River Bonebed, Late Cretaceous
    TAPHONOMY OF THE SUN RIVER BONEBED, LATE CRETACEOUS (CAMPANIAN) TWO MEDICINE FORMATION OF MONTANA by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY-BOZEMAN Bozeman, Montana April 2008 © COPYRIGHT by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer 2008 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by Benjamin Andrew Scherzer This thesis has been read by each member of the thesis committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citations, bibliographic style, and consistency, and is ready for submission to the Division of Graduate Education. Dr. David J. Varricchio Approved for the Department of Earth Sciences Dr. Stephan G. Custer Approved for the Division of Graduate Education Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment for the requirements for a master’s degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. If I have indicated my intention to copyright this thesis by including a copyright notice page, copying is allowed only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Request for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this thesis in whole or in parts may be granted only by the copyright holder. Benjamin Andrew Scherzer April 2008 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have come to completion without the help of each member of my committee: Dave Varricchio, Jack Horner, and Jim Schmitt.
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Hydrologic and Geomorphic Responses to Intentional Levee Breaches Along the Lower Cosumnes River, California
    Received: 21 April 2016 Revised: 29 March 2017 Accepted: 30 March 2017 DOI: 10.1002/rra.3159 RESEARCH ARTICLE Not all breaks are equal: Variable hydrologic and geomorphic responses to intentional levee breaches along the lower Cosumnes River, California A. L. Nichols1 | J. H. Viers1,2 1 Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA Abstract 2 School of Engineering, University of The transport of water and sediment from rivers to adjacent floodplains helps generate complex California, Merced, California, USA floodplain, wetland, and riparian ecosystems. However, riverside levees restrict lateral connectiv- Correspondence ity of water and sediment during flood pulses, making the re‐introduction of floodplain hydrogeo- A. L. Nichols, Center for Watershed Sciences, morphic processes through intentional levee breaching and removal an emerging floodplain University of California, Davis, California, USA. restoration practice. Repeated topographic observations from levee breach sites along the lower Email: [email protected] Cosumnes River (USA) indicated that breach architecture influences floodplain and channel hydrogeomorphic processes. Where narrow breaches (<75 m) open onto graded floodplains, Funding information California Department of Fish and Wildlife archetypal crevasse splays developed along a single dominant flowpath, with floodplain erosion (CDFW) Ecosystem Restoration Program in near‐bank areas and lobate splay deposition in distal floodplain regions. Narrow breaches (ERP), Grant/Award Number: E1120001; The opening into excavated floodplain channels promoted both transverse advection and turbulent Nature Concervancy (TNC); Consumnes River Preserve diffusion of sediment into the floodplain channel, facilitating near‐bank deposition and potential breach closure. Wide breaches (>250 m) enabled multiple modes of water and sediment transport onto graded floodplains.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Sedimentary Patterns
    ANRV400-FL42-03 ARI 13 November 2009 11:49 Fluvial Sedimentary Patterns G. Seminara Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2010. 42:43–66 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on sediment transport, morphodynamics, stability, meander, dunes, bars August 17, 2009 The Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics is online at Abstract fluid.annualreviews.org Geomorphology is concerned with the shaping of Earth’s surface. A major by University of California - Berkeley on 02/08/12. For personal use only. This article’s doi: contributing mechanism is the interaction of natural fluids with the erodible 10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145612 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2010.42:43-66. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org surface of Earth, which is ultimately responsible for the variety of sedi- Copyright c 2010 by Annual Reviews. mentary patterns observed in rivers, estuaries, coasts, deserts, and the deep All rights reserved submarine environment. This review focuses on fluvial patterns, both free 0066-4189/10/0115-0043$20.00 and forced. Free patterns arise spontaneously from instabilities of the liquid- solid interface in the form of interfacial waves affecting either bed elevation or channel alignment: Their peculiar feature is that they express instabilities of the boundary itself rather than flow instabilities capable of destabilizing the boundary. Forced patterns arise from external hydrologic forcing affect- ing the boundary conditions of the system. After reviewing the formulation of the problem of morphodynamics, which turns out to have the nature of a free boundary problem, I discuss systematically the hierarchy of patterns observed in river basins at different scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptions of Common Sedimentary Environments
    Descriptions of Common Sedimentary Environments River systems: . Alluvial Fan: a pile of sediment at the base of mountains shaped like a fan. When a stream comes out of the mountains onto the flat plain, it drops its sediment load. The sediment ranges from fine to very coarse angular sediment, including boulders. Alluvial fans are often built by flash floods. River Channel: where the river flows. The channel moves sideways over time. Typical sediments include sand, gravel and cobbles. Particles are typically rounded and sorted. The sediment shows signs of current, such as ripple marks. Flood Plain: where the river overflows periodically. When the river overflows, its velocity decreases rapidly. This means that the coarsest sediment (usually sand) is deposited next to the river, and the finer sediment (silt and clay) is deposited in thin layers farther from the river. Delta: where a stream enters a standing body of water (ocean, bay or lake). As the velocity of the river drops, it dumps its sediment. Over time, the deposits build further and further into the standing body of water. Deltas are complex environments with channels of coarser sediment, floodplain areas of finer sediment, and swamps with very fine sediment and organic deposits (coal) Lake: fresh or alkaline water. Lakes tend to be quiet water environments (except very large lakes like the Great Lakes, which have shorelines much like ocean beaches). Alkaline lakes that seasonally dry up leave evaporite deposits. Most lakes leave clay and silt deposits. Beach, barrier bar: near-shore or shoreline deposits. Beaches are active water environments, and so tend to have coarser sediment (sand, gravel and cobbles).
    [Show full text]
  • The Thick-Splay Depositional Style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of West-Central New Mexico Steven J
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/34 The thick-splay depositional style of the Crevasse Canyon Formation, Cretaceous of west-central New Mexico Steven J. Johansen, 1983, pp. 173-178 in: Socorro Region II, Chapin, C. E.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 34th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 344 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1983 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 9 Sedimentary Structures: Textures and Depositional Settings
    CHAPTER 9 Sedimentary Structures: Textures and Depositional Settings of Shales from the Lower Belt Supergroup, Mid-Proterozoic, Montana, U.S.A. Juergen Schieber Introduction shown in Figure 9.2 and summarized in Figure 9.3. Siltstone beds commonly form graded silt/mud couplets with overlying beds of The Belt Supergroup of the northwestern United States is a thick (20 dolomitic clayey shale (Fig. 9.2). These couplets show parallel km) shale-dominated sequence that accumulated in an epicontinental lamination, cross-lamination, and graded rhythmites in the lower silty basin between 1450 and 850 Ma (Harrison, 1972; Stewart, 1976). In this portion. chapter shales from the lower portion of the Belt Supergroup are examined and interpreted with respect to potential depositional Interpretation environment. Shale samples were collected in the eastern portion of the basin from the Newland Formation, and in the central and western Beds of hummocky cross-stratified sandstones (Harms et al., 1982) portion of the basin from its lateral equivalent, the Prichard Formation occur interbedded with the striped shales, indicating occasional (Fig. 9.1). sediment deposition by storms. Interstratified carbonate units contain Shales of the Newland Formation have been studied in considerable various indicators of relatively shallow water, such as wave and current detail (Schieber, 1985, 1986, 1989), and six major shale fades types can ripples, flat pebble conglomerates, and cryptalgal laminites. Irregular be distinguished. The overall depositional setting for these shales was wavy-crinkly laminae (Fig. 9.2) and mechanical strength during soft probably a shallow, low-energy shelf. Shales of the Prichard Formation sediment deformation suggest a microbial mat origin for carbonaceous were deposited in a deeper portion of the basin, and differ in a number silty shale beds (discussed in depth by Schieber, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Fades Models 3. Sandy Fluvial Systems
    Geosclence Canada. Volume 3. Number 2. May. 1976 101 hydrocarbon reservoirs, themeandering builds laterally and downstream across systems depositing elongate shoestring the flood plain. sands stratigraphically bounded by The channel floor commonly has a shales, and the sandy braided systems coarse "lag" deposa of material that the forming thicker and laterally more river can only move at peak flood time. extensive sand bodies. This material would include the gravelly component of the clastic load, together handerlng Systems with water-logged plant material and The main elementsof a modern partly consolidated blocks of mud meandering system lexemplified by the eroded locallvfrom the channel wall. ~ississi~~ior~razoi exi is) ~iveis] Above the lag, sand is transported Fades Models are shown in Figure 1. Sandy deposition through the system as bedload. During IS normally restrlctea to the maln average discharge, tne typlcal bedlorm 3. Sandy Fluvial channel or to oart~alv or Comoletelv on the cnannel floor cons~sls~ ~ ~ ol slnbo~s-~ ~~~~ abandoned meander'loops; deposition crested dunes (Fig. I)ranging in height systems of fines (silt and clay) occurs on levees from about 30 cm to one metre. and in flood basins. It is surprising that Preservation of these dunes results in there are so few integrated studies of trough cross-stratification. In shallower Roger G. Walker modern meandering systems in the parts of the flow, higher on the point bar. Department of Geology laeralure of the last twenty years. The the bedform is commonly ripples McMaster University most important papers include those of (preserved as trough cross lamination; Hamilton, Ontario LBS 4Ml Sundborg (1956; River Klaralven).
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Structures in Base-Surge Deposits with Special Reference to Cross-Bedding, Ubehebe Craters, Death Valley, California
    BRUCE M. CROWE \ Department of Geological Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, RICHARD V. FISHER j Santa Barbara, California 93106 Sedimentary Structures in Base-Surge Deposits with Special Reference to Cross-Bedding, Ubehebe Craters, Death Valley, California Note: This paper is dedicated to Aaron and Elizabeth more km2. The volcanic field is named from Waters on the occasion of Dr. Waters' retirement. the largest crater, Ubehebe. Following the recognition of base-surge depositions in the rim beds of Ubehebe Crater ABSTRACT (Fisher and Waters, 1969, 1970), the present Ubehebe craters, Death Valley, California, study was undertaken to evaluate in greater include over a dozen maar volcanoes formed detail the physical characteristics of base-surge primarily by phreatic eruptions of trachybasalt deposits in order to gain possible insights into through a thick and permeable fanglomeratic flow mechanisms of base surges. Particular sequence on the north slope of Tin Mountain. attention is given here to the bed forms de- Tuff derived from Ubehebe Crater, the scribed as antidunes at Ubehebe by Fisher and largest crater in the area, is characteristically Waters (1970). thinly bedded or laminated and was deposited The Ubehebe craters originated on the by airfall and base-surge processes. Thick- gullied northern slope of Tin Mountain in late bedded deposits showing evidence of mass flow Pleistocene or Holocene time following the dis- occur where base surges were concentrated appearance of ancient Pleistocene (?) lake within, and followed gullies which had been waters. About 4 km north of the craters, tuff carved into the fanglomerate prior to eruption. from Ubehebe rests on lake deposits exposed Cross-bedded sequences were deposited by in the valley floor.
    [Show full text]
  • GY 402: Sedimentary Petrology
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA GY 402: Sedimentary Petrology Lecture 17: Sandy Fluvial Depositional Environments Instructor: Dr. Douglas W. Haywick Last Time Volcaniclastic Sedimentary Rocks 1. Origin of volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks 2. Classification of volcaniclastic sed. rocks 3. Thin section petrography Volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks Air fall coarse fine Volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks tephra ignimbrite tephra ignimbrite Volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks Parallel laminations Volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks are sedimentary rocks… Channel lag … they follow sedimentary rules Volcaniclastic Petrography Source: Carozzi, A.V., 1993. Sedimentary Petrology. Prentice Hill, 263p. 1993. Sedimentary Petrology. A.V., Source: Carozzi, Vitric\Crystal Tuff quartz rock frag ppl xn 1.5mm vitric fragments Today’s Agenda Sandy Fluvial Siliciclastic Environments •Meandering river dynamics •Sedimentary facies •The model (vertical sections) Meandering Rivers • Sinuous, single channel drainage systems Meandering Rivers • Sinuous, single channel drainage systems • Typically form on low gradient alluvial plains Meandering Rivers • Sinuous, single channel drainage systems • Typically form on low gradient alluvial plains • Sinuosity depends on gradient Meandering Rivers • Are characterized by a distinct suite of facies and processes • Oxbow lakes • Levees • Floodplains • Cut banks • Point bars • Yazoo streams • Cutoffs Meandering Rivers • The channel meanders across the flood plain Meandering Rivers • Deposition occurs on the inside of meander loops (point bar) Meandering Rivers • Large point bars may consist of numerous accretionary ridges Meandering Rivers • Erosion occurs on the outside of meander loops (cut bank) Meandering Rivers • Meandering river channels are asymmetrical (deepest near cut bank) Meandering Rivers • Water velocity is greatest where the channel is deepest resulting in a “corkscrew” flow pattern. http://www.geocities.com/sogodbay/Images/SDK/Inecar03.jpg Meandering Rivers • Vortices can be either singular or complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Sedimentary Structures in Some Metamorphic Rocks
    Sedimentary Structures in Metamorphic Rocks Maine Geological Survey Maine Geologic Facts and Localities November, 2006 Primary Sedimentary Structures in Some Metamorphic Rocks Text by Thomas K. Weddle Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 1 Sedimentary Structures in Metamorphic Rocks Maine Geological Survey Introduction In most introductory geology classes, be it in an elementary school or at a college, students learn that there are three fundamental rock types: sedimentary, igneous, and metamorphic rocks. Sedimentary rocks are formed by the deposition of sediment by several processes, either by settling of sediment particles in a body of water, by chemical precipitation in water, or by transportation of the particles by water such as streams and rivers, or by wind (Figures 1-3). Maine Geological Survey Photo by Thomas K. Weddle K. Thomas by Photo Figure 1. Glacial marine sand beds with nearly parallel, horizontal layering, Buckfield, ME (entrenching tool for scale). Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 2 Sedimentary Structures in Metamorphic Rocks Maine Geological Survey Sedimentary Rocks Maine Geological Survey Photo by Thomas K. Weddle K. Thomas by Photo Figure 2. Fluvial trough cross bedding in slightly gravelly, coarse sand. The cross bed sets are incised into one another and highlighted by the darker colored layers (entrenching tool for scale), Buckfield, Maine. Maine Geological Survey, Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry 3 Sedimentary Structures in Metamorphic Rocks Maine Geological Survey Sedimentary Rocks Maine Geological Survey Photo by Thomas K. Weddle K. Thomas by Photo Figure 3. Coarse cobble gravel in a glacial fluvial deposit, Kingfield, Maine (entrenching tool for scale).
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Structures of Tidal Flats: a Journey from Coast to Inner
    Sedimentary structures of tidal flats: A journey from coast to inner estuarine region of eastern India A Chakrabarti Retired Professor, Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. Present address: 23A P.G.M. Shah Road, Kolkata 700 033, India. e-mail: [email protected] Sedimentary structures of some coastal tropical tidal flats of the east coast of India, and inner estuarine tidal point bars located at 30 to 50 kilometers inland from the coast, have been extensively studied under varying seasonal conditions. The results reveal that physical features such as flaser bedding, herringbone cross-bedding, lenticular bedding, and mud/silt couplets are common to both the environments. In fact, flaser bedding and lenticular bedding are more common in the point bar facies during the monsoon months than in the coastal tidal flat environments. Interference ripples, though common in both the environments, show different architectural patterns for different environmental domains. Interference ripples with thread-like secondary set overriding the earlier ripple-form, resembling wrinkle marks, are the typical features in estuarine point bars near the high water region. Because structures which are so far considered as key structures for near-coastal tidal flats are common to both the environments, caution should be exercised for deciphering palaeo-environments, particularly for Proterozoic rocks, where one has to depend only on physical sedimentary structures. 1. Introduction and history of carbonates. Reineck (1972) classified sheltered tidal flat study tidal flats as mud-flat, mixed-flat and sand-flat as one proceeds from high tide line to low tide line.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Nonmigrating Mid-Channel Bar and Superimposed Dunes in a Sandy-Gravelly River (Loire River, France)
    Geomorphology 248 (2015) 185–204 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Dynamics of nonmigrating mid-channel bar and superimposed dunes in a sandy-gravelly river (Loire River, France) Coraline L. Wintenberger a, Stéphane Rodrigues a,⁎, Nicolas Claude b, Philippe Jugé c, Jean-Gabriel Bréhéret a, Marc Villar d a Université François Rabelais de Tours, E.A. 6293 GéHCO, GéoHydrosystèmes Continentaux, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Parc de Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France b Université Paris-Est, Laboratoire d'hydraulique Saint-Venant, ENPC, EDF R&D, CETMEF, 78 400 Chatou, France c Université François Rabelais — Tours, CETU ELMIS, 11 quai Danton, 37 500 Chinon, France d INRA, UR 0588, Amélioration, Génétique et Physiologie Forestières, 2163 Avenue de la Pomme de Pin, CS 40001 Ardon, 45075 Orléans Cedex 2, France article info abstract Article history: A field study was carried out to investigate the dynamics during floods of a nonmigrating, mid-channel bar of the Received 11 February 2015 Loire River (France) forced by a riffle and renewed by fluvial management works. Interactions between the bar Received in revised form 17 July 2015 and superimposed dunes developed from an initial flat bed were analyzed during floods using frequent mono- Accepted 18 July 2015 and multibeam echosoundings, Acoustic Doppler Profiler measurements, and sediment grain-size analysis. Available online 4 August 2015 When water left the bar, terrestrial laser scanning and sediment sampling documented the effect of post-flood sediment reworking. Keywords: fl fi Sandy-gravelly rivers During oods a signi cant bar front elongation, spreading (on margins), and swelling was shown, whereas a sta- Nonmigrating (forced) bar ble area (no significant changes) was present close to the riffle.
    [Show full text]