Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM FISCAL NOTE LOG--HOUSE BILLS 2009 Tuesday, March 10, 2009 Link to 2009 Legislature General Session Numbered Bills and Resolutions Link to 2009 Legislation Governor Actions Link to Bills and Bill Requests by Sponsor, Subject or Committee Link to Legislative Calendars Link to Weekly Schedules of House and Senate Link to Recorded House Floor Debates USOE Fiscal Note Input Web Site House and Senate Calendar Displays New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u Enactment of this bill appropriates $2,054,384,486 in ongoing Uniform School s Enactment of this bill appropriates $2,054,384,486 in ongoing Uniform School Funds, $86,347,800 in one-time Uniform School Funds, $20,000,000 in Funds, $86,347,800 in one-time Uniform School Funds, $20,000,000 in ongoing ongoing Uniform School Fund Restricted - Interest and Dividends, and Uniform School Fund Restricted - Interest and Dividends, and $207,176,000 in $207,176,000 in one-time American Recovery and Reinvestment Act monies one-time American Recovery and Reinvestment Act monies to the Minimum to the Minimum School Program for FY 2010. As a supplemental appropriation School Program for FY 2010. As a supplemental appropriation in FY 2009, in FY 2009, enactment of this bill appropriates ($84,167,200) in one-time enactment of this bill appropriates ($84,167,200) in one-time Uniform School Uniform School Funds, $91,200,000 in one-time American Recovery and Funds, $91,200,000 in one-time American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Reinvestment Act monies to the Minimum School Program. As a supplemental monies to the Minimum School Program. As a supplemental appropriation in FY appropriation in FY 2009, enactment of this bill appropriates $3,171,700 in one- 2009, enactment of this bill appropriates $3,171,700 in one-time Uniform School Minimum School Program time Uniform School Funds to the Capital Outlay Foundation and Capital Funds to the Capital Outlay Foundation and Capital Outlay Enrollment Growth Outlay Enrollment Growth Programs. Enactment of this bill provides for a total H.B. 2 Budget Amendments--Merlynn Yes Yes 9-Mar-09 Cathy 10-Mar-09 Programs. Enactment of this bill provides for a total Minimum School Budget of Minimum School Budget of approximately $2.9 billion in FY 2010 and the approximately $2.9 billion in FY 2010 and the Weighted Pupil Unit value remains T. Newbold Weighted Pupil Unit value remains at $2,577 per WPU. Enactment of this bill at $2,577 per WPU. Enactment of this bill increases or decreases funding for increases or decreases funding for programs within the Minimum School programs within the Minimum School Program and School Building Programs that Program and School Building Programs that is distributed to support the is distributed to support the operation of public schools. School districts and operation of public schools. School districts and charter schools may see a charter schools may see a change in their state fund allocations based on their change in their state fund allocations based on their individual level of individual level of participation in programs being increased or decreased. participation in programs being increased or decreased. Individuals and Individuals and businesses may also be impacted through their associated businesses may also be impacted through their associated dealings with dealings with school districts and charter schools, the extent of which is school districts and charter schools, the extent of which is dependent on the dependent on the overall impact to each school district or charter school. overall impact to each school district or charter school.

Enactment of this bill appropriates $2,054,384,486 in ongoing Uniform School Funds, $86,347,800 in one-time Uniform School Funds, $20,000,000 in ongoing Uniform School Fund Restricted - Interest and Dividends, and $207,176,000 in one-time American Recovery and Reinvestment Act monies to the Minimum School Program for FY 2010. As a supplemental appropriation in FY 2009, enactment of this bill appropriates ($84,167,200) in one-time Uniform School Funds, $91,200,000 in one-time American Recovery and Reinvestment Act monies to the Minimum School Program. As a supplemental appropriation in FY 2009, enactment of this bill appropriates $3,171,700 in one-time Uniform School Funds to the Capital Outlay Foundation and Minimum School Program Capital Outlay Enrollment Growth Programs. Enactment of this bill provides for a total Minimum School Budget of approximately $2.9 billion in FY 2010 and the Weighted Pupil Unit value remains H.B. 2 S1 Budget Amendments--Senator Yes 10-Mar-09 Cathy 10-Mar-09 at $2,577 per WPU. Enactment of this bill increases or decreases funding for programs within the Minimum School Program and School Building Programs that is distributed to support the Howard A. Stephenson operation of public schools. School districts and charter schools may see a change in their state fund allocations based on their individual level of participation in programs being increased or decreased. Individuals and businesses may also be impacted through their associated dealings with school districts and charter schools, the extent of which is dependent on the overall impact to each school district or charter school. In addition, Charter schools will need tentative prior approval for an increase in their enrollment in the FY2011-12 school year or thereafter. This first substitute also increases a school district's portion of their property tax revenue to each resident student who is enrolled in a charter school from 25% in FY2009-10, 50% in FY 2010-11, 75% in FY2011-12, and 100% in FY 2012-13.

H.B. 3-- Passed 2 This bill appropriates $137,034,800, including ($76,515,100) from general and Feb 2009-- Current Year Supplemental education funds, for the use and support of state agencies and higher education 2 Yes Yes institutions for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2008 and ending June 30, 2009. Signed by Appropriations--Ron Bigelow Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or Governor 9 benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments. Feb 09

Material Harmful to Minors Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 14 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments -- Sheryl L. Allen businesses, or local governments.

The restructuring of the Salt Lake/Tooele campus of the Utah College of Applied Technology will result in a stand-alone UCAT campus in Tooele to serve students there and the School of Applied Technology at Salt Lake Community College to H.B. 15-- Career and Technical serve the students in Salt Lake County. The current tax fund appropriation to Passed 20 1 Education Amendments--Ron Yes Yes SLTATC is $3,297,200. With an anticipated 15% base reduction in FY 2010, the balance to be divided between SLCC and the Tooele ATC is $2,802,600. Based Feb 2009 Bigelow on the current distribution of students and the anticipated fixed, start-up costs associated with establishing the new TATC, a split in the funding of 60%/40% is assumed with SLCC's portion being $1,682,900 and TATC's being $1,119,700.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 1 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Certified Tax Rate H.B. 23 Yes Yes None published Amendments--Fred Hunsaker Certified Tax Rate Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill could result in a loss of local revenue of $58 million in FY 2010. The loss is Amendments--Fred Hunsaker-- expected to decrease in FY 2011 and for the following five years. Local H.B. 23 S1 Yes Yes substituted in House governments could choose to go through truth in taxation to minimize losses. As the certified rate decreases individuals and businesses could see reductions in Committee property taxes owed.

Certified Tax Rate Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 23 S2-- Amendments--Fred Hunsaker-- bill could result in a shift in property taxes between taxpayers of approximately $58 Passed 23 1 Yes Yes million in FY 2010. Local governments could choose to go through truth in taxation substituted in House Feb 2009 after the first year to minimize losses. As the certified rate adjusts individuals and Committee businesses could see either increases or reductions in property taxes owed. H.B. 28-- Personal Property Tax Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this Passed 19 1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Craig Frank Feb 2009 businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will create a net ongoing General Fund impact of $7,500 in H.B. 29-- workload costs to the Courts - $25,000 of ongoing General Fund appropriations Sex Offenders' Contact with and General Fund Revenues of approximately $17,500. Enactment of this bill will Pased 10 1 Yes Yes increase Dedicated Credits revenue and expenditures at the Department of Children--Richard Greenwood Corrections by $10,000 each year beginning in FY 2010 until FY 2014 when they Mar 2009 will remain constant at $50,000 per year. Enactment may impact local law enforcement agencies however the impact is unquantifiable at this time.

Enactment of this bill may reduce revenue to the Education Fund by $2,200,000 in FY 2010 and by $3,900,000 in FY 2011. The carry forward provisions of this bill Nonrefundable Higher will increase the total revenue loss annually. By FY 2035 the estimated revenue H.B. 35 Education Tuition Credit--John Yes Yes loss is $461,000,000 per year. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses, or local governments. Dougall Individuals who have paid college tuition could receive a credit over time equal to the full cost of tuition.

Enactment of this bill may reduce revenue to the Education Fund by $2,200,000 in FY 2010 and by $3,900,000 in FY 2011. The carry forward provisions of this bill Higher Education Tax Credit will increase the total revenue loss annually. By FY 2035 the estimated revenue H.B. 35 S1 Yes Yes loss is $461,000,000 per year. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, and Contribution--John Dougall measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses, or local governments. Individuals who have paid college tuition could receive a credit over time equal to the full cost of tuition.

H.B. 39-- Utah Injured Worker Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 5 1 Reemployment Act--Michael T. Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses Feb 2009 Morley and local governments. Individuals may benefit from the ability to receive addition Per Diem and Travel Expenses H.B. 45-- for State Boards and Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this Passed 12 1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Commissions--Douglas Feb 2009 businesses, or local governments. Aagard Local Government Entity Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this H.B. 61 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Changes--Kory Holdaway businesses, or local governments. Local Government Entity H.B. 61 S1 Yes Yes None published Changes--Kory Holdaway H.B. 61 S2-- Local Government Entity Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 26 1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Changes--Kory Holdaway Feb 2009 businesses, or local governments. H.B. 63-- Amendments to Child Welfare-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this Passed 27 1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Wayne Harper Feb 2009 businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 2 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $155,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $155,000,000. The property tax portion of school funding that is provided by the locals to the state may increase from about 20% to 35% in FY 2020. Due to recapture, revenue to the Uniform School Fund could increase by $9,800,000. Enactment of this bill Link to Property Tax Amendments-- No new state costs; see spreadsheets linked to bill will shift $32,000,000 between school districts. If a school district that experiences H.B. 66 spreadsheets for Yes Yes 13-Jan-09 Cathy 20-Jan-09 a decrease in revenue decides to go through truth in taxation to make up the lost Merlynn Newbold title. revenue, there will be an increase in property tax on individuals and businesses. fiscal note Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. On the provision related to the capital outlay foundation program, there will be a shift of $14,000,000 to high growth districts from non-high growth districts.

Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $155,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $155,000,000. The property tax portion of school funding that is provided by the locals to the state may increase from about 20% to 35% in FY 2020. Due to recapture, revenue Property Tax Amendments-- to the Uniform School Fund could increase by $9,800,000. Enactment of this bill H.B. 66 S1 Yes Yes will shift $32,000,000 between school districts. If a school district that experiences Merlynn Newbold a decrease in revenue decides to go through truth in taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses.

Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $155,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $155,000,000. The property tax portion of school funding that is provided by the locals to the state may increase from about 20% to 35% in FY 2020. Due to recapture, revenue Property Tax Amendments-- to the Uniform School Fund could increase by $9,800,000. Enactment of this bill H.B. 66 S2 Yes Yes will shift $32,000,000 between school districts. If a school district that experiences Merlynn Newbold a decrease in revenue decides to go through truth in taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses.

Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $155,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $155,000,000. The property tax portion of school funding that is provided by the locals to the state may increase from about 20% to 35% in FY 2020. Due to recapture, revenue to the Uniform School Fund could increase by $9,800,000. Enactment of Property Tax Amendments-- this bill will shift $32,000,000 between school districts. If a school district that H.B. 66 S3 Temporary URL Yes experiences a decrease in revenue decides to go through truth in taxation to make Gregory H. Hughes up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. On the provision relating to the elimination of the capital outlay in counties of the first class, this bill would eliminate $14,000,000 in shifting that would take place.

Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate and guarantees a minimum amount of property tax revenue from the basic rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $9,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $9,000,000. H.B. 66 S4 Due to recapture, revenue to the Uniform School Fund could increase by as Amended Property Tax Amendments-- $2,700,000. Enactment of this bill will shift $1,900,000 between school districts in Yes Yes FY 2011. If a school district that experiences a decrease in revenue decides to go by Rep Brad Merlynn Newbold through truth in taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in Last property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. There will likely be recapture of $2,700,000 from school districts to the Uniform School Fund.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 3 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate and guarantees a minimum amount of property tax revenue from the basic rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $155,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $155,000,000. The property tax portion of school funding that is provided by the locals to the state may increase from about 20% to 35% in FY 2020. Due to recapture, revenue to the Uniform School Fund could increase by $9,800,000. Enactment of this bill will shift $32,000,000 between school districts. If a school Property Tax Amendments-- district that experiences a decrease in revenue decides to go through truth in H.B. 66 S5 Temporary URL Yes Greg Hughes taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. There will likely be recapture of $9,800,000 from school districts to the Uniform School Fund. On the provision relating to the elimination of the capital outlay in counties of the first class and divided school districts, this would eliminate $14,000,000 in shifting that would have taken place.

Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate and guarantees a minimum amount of property tax revenue from the basic rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $9,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $9,000,000. Due to recapture, revenue to the Uniform School Fund could increase by Property Tax Amendments-- $2,700,000. Enactment of this bill will shift $1,900,000 between school districts in H.B. 66 S6 Temporary URL Yes FY 2011. If a school district that experiences a decrease in revenue decides to go Jim Bird through truth in taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. There will likely be recapture of $2,700,000 from school districts to the Uniform School Fund.

Property Tax Amendments-- H.B. 66 S7 Temporary URL Yes None Published Jim Bird

Enactment of this bill raises the minimum basic state rate and guarantees a minimum amount of property tax revenue from the basic rate. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $9,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate increase, other local property tax will decrease by $9,000,000. Due to recapture, revenue to the Uniform School Fund could increase by $2,700,000. Enactment of this bill will shift $1,900,000 between school districts in Property Tax Amendments-- FY 2011. If a school district that experiences a decrease in revenue decides to go H.B. 66 S8 Temporary URL Yes through truth in taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in Greg Hughes property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. There will likely be recapture of $2,700,000 from school districts to the Uniform School Fund. On the provision relating to the elimination of the capital outlay in counties of the first class, this would eliminate $14,000,000 in shifting that would have taken place.

Enactment of this bill freezes the minimum basic state rate and guarantees a minimum amount of property tax revenue from the basic rate. The freezing of the basic rate will reduce the state's Uniform School Fund obligation to the basic school program. This increases the local portion of the minimum school program by $9,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate freeze, other local property tax school program by $9,000,000 in FY 2011. Because of the basic rate freeze, other local property tax by $2,700,000. Enactment of this bill could increase Property Tax Amendments-- H.B. 66 S9 Yes Yes revenue to school districts to offset the costs of charter school replacement Sheryl L. Allen funding by $3.5 million in FY 2011. If a school district that experiences a decrease in revenue decides to go through truth in taxation to make up the lost revenue, there will be an increase in property tax on individuals and businesses. Some school districts will likely experience an increase in revenue. If a school district that receives an increase in revenue decides to decrease other property taxes, there will be a decrease in local property tax on certain individuals and businesses. There will likely be recapture of $2,700,000 from school districts to the Uniform School Fund.

H.B. 67-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this Public Hearings on Property bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals Passed 20 1 Yes Yes Tax Increases--Gage Frorer or businesses. Locals could experience some administrative savings as a result of Feb 2009 the changes to the publication requirements.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 4 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this s Vehicle Operator Turn off H.B. 73 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Requirements--Fred Hunsaker businesses, or local governments. Vehicle Operator Turn off Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 73 S1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses Requirements--Fred Hunsaker and local governments.

Enactment of this bill could reduce the Education fund by $400,000 annually. Income Tax Credit for At-Home Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or H.B. 79 Yes Yes Parent--Jack Draxler benefits for businesses, or local governments. Eligible individuals would receive an additional $100 income tax credit.

Enactment of this bill will appropriate $1,500,000 from the General Fund to the Teacher Mortgage Loan Cost of loan funds: $1.5 million; additional cost to administer the State Board of Education to implement and administer the Teacher Mortgage H.B. 82 Yes Yes 19-Jan-09 Von 20-Jan-09 Loan Program. It is assumed that any administrative costs are included in the Program--Lynn Hemingway loan program: $115,000 appropriation. This bill would help individual teachers who participate in the Teacher Mortgage Loan Program to purchase a home

Enactment of this bill may reduce General Fund revenue by an estimated $122,000 in FY 2010 and by $125,000 in FY 2011. Enactment of this bill likely will Property Tax Relief Programs-- not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses. Local H.B. 83 Yes Yes Gage Frorer governments could see a reduction in revenues of $650,000 annually. Eligible individuals who rent or own residences could benefit from enhanced circuit breaker credits on income tax returns.

H.B. 91-- Individual Development Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses 1 Passed 23 Account Amendments-- F. Jay Yes and local governments. Individuals may benefit from the ability to receive Feb 2009 Seegmiller additional services with the enactment of this bill.

Restrictions on Use of Enactment of this bill will require $20,000 per year from the General Fund appropriated to the Courts beginning in FY 2010. The bill will also generate Wireless Communication $27,600 per year in new General Fund revenue beginning in FY 2010, for a net H.B. 95 Yes Yes Devices in Vehicles--Phil General Fund increase of $7,600 per year. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Riesen Local governments through Justice Courts adjudications will benefit.

Restrictions on Use of Wireless Communication H.B. 95 S1 Temporary URL Yes None published Devices in Vehicles--Phil Riesen

Restrictions on Use of Enactment of this bill will require $4,000 per year from the General Fund appropriated to the Courts beginning in FY 2010. The bill will also generate Wireless Communication $5,200 per year in new General Fund revenue beginning in FY 2010, for a net H.B. 95 S2 Yes Yes Devices in Vehicles--Phil General Fund increase of $1,200 per year. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Riesen Local governments through Justice Courts adjudications will benefit.

State Retirement System Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 96 Participation for Charter Yes Yes 16-Jan-09 Von 20-Jan-09 No fiscal impact. bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses Schools--Christine F. Watkins or local governments. Individuals may benefit in this change in statute.

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations nor is it expected to Professional Licensure generate additional revenue. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, H.B. 99 Yes Exemptions--Larry Wiley measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or local governments. Businesses may incur additional costs for licensure.

H.B. 118-- Archives and GRAMA Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 5 1 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Revisions--Douglas C. Aagard Mar 2009 businesses, or local governments

Government Records Access And Management Act Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 122 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Douglas A. businesses, or local governments Aagard

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 5 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Enactment of this bill appropriates $13,100,000 from the Uniform School Fund to the Minimum School Program to offset estimated reductions in local feel revenue collected by school districts and charter schools. Bill provisions establish the School Fee Replacement Program within the Minimum School Program as a Weighted Pupil Unit driven program and assigns it 5,083 WPUs. Increasing the School Fee Amendments-- Ongoing appropriation from USF of $13.1 million beginning in FY number of WPUs in the Minimum School Program also increases the cost of the H.B. 131 Yes Yes 28-Jan-09 Von 30-Jan-09 state guarantee for the Voted and Board Leeway programs. This increase is Craig Frank 2009 estimated to cost an additional $203,100 from the Uniform School Fund and would be funded through the fiscal note process. Enactment of this bill may reduce school fees paid by students. School districts and charter schools may experience an increase or decrease in funding depending on their current fee collections and the amount of School Fee Replacement Program funding they receive. Expenditures of School and Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Institutional Trust Land Money bill will not create additional costs for local districts, but will allow them to use H.B. 146 Yes Yes 30-Jan-09 Von 2-Feb-09 No fiscal impact. by School Districts-- School LAND Trust Program monies for purchase of solar or geothermal systems which may, in turn, impact revenue available for education. Representative Tim Cosgrove H.B. 149-- Forest Reserve Fund Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Gov Signed 2 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals Revisions--Michael E. Noel 24 Feb 2009 or businesses. Local revenues could increase by approximately $7,000,000. State Board of Education Member Election Process Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 150 Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Von 3-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Carol businesses, or local governments. Spackman Moss State Board of Education Member Election Process Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 150 S1 Yes Yes 12-Feb-09 Von 17-Feb-09 No Fiscal Impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Carol businesses, or local governments. Spackman Moss State Board of Education There is no fiscal impact to school districts or the state. This bill would impact Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 150 S2 Member Election Process Temporary URL Yes 20-Feb-09 Von 23-Feb-09 calendar entities (NOT school districts) by giving them options if they desire to bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Kenneth W. levy a tax rate that exceeds the calendar year taxing entity's certified tax rate. businesses, or local governments. Sumsion H.B. 154-- State Construction Registry Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 2 1 Amendments--Michael T. Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Mar 2009 Morley businesses, or local governments.

The objective of this bill is to try and avoid a property tax increase in the Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this remaining Jordan School District property boundaries after the school district Equalization of Funding for bill could result in a property tax shift of $16,400,000 in FY 2010 and $17,300,000 split has occurred. A net property tax increase is possible for the remaining in FY 2011 between individuals and businesses depending upon geographic H.B. 155 Divided School Districts--Jim Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Cathy 6-Feb-09 Jordan School District. It is important to point out that this initially may not be location. Districts experiencing decreased revenue due to the shift will either a property tax rate increase, but we do not know what the Boards of Education Bird. reduce budgets or increase property tax assessments through truth in taxation. of the divided school districts will do in the future.

Subdivision Approval Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 156 S1 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--R. Curt Webb businesses, or local governments.

Enacting this bill will require an appropriation from the Commerce Service Fund of Licensing of Vocational $21,500 in FY 2010 and $35,400 ongoing in FY 2011. The bill will generate additional revenue of $20,500 in FY 2010. Licenses are renewed every other year H.B. 174 Rehabilitation Counselors-- Yes resulting in up and down revenue cycles. Enactment of this bill likely will not result Ronda Rudd Menlove in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for local governments. Businesses and individuals may be impacted by this change in statute.

School District Division Sent to Interim Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 186 Yes Yes 13-Feb-09 Cathy 18-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendment--Laura Black Committee for Study businesses, or local governments.

Instruction in Health Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 189 Amendments--Lynn N. Yes Yes 6-Feb-09 Randy 10-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Hemingway businesses, or local governments.

H.B. 194-- Education Policies for Military Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 10 1 Children--Ronda Rudd Yes Yes 6-Feb-09 Randy 9-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Mar 2009 Menlove businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 6 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s H.B. 197-- Reauthorization of Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 10 1 Administrative Rules--Ben C. Yes Yes 6-Feb-09 Randy 9-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Mar 2009 Ferry businesses, or local governments.

This bill is creating a Capital Outlay Equalization Fund which is funded by revenues from the new Basic Capital Outlay Levy, revenues from the rate reduction limitation increment, and legislative appropriations. Also, any Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this interest earned on the fund shall be deposited into the fund. The rate reduction Statewide Equalization of bill could result in a property tax shift of $55,000,000 in FY 2011 between limitation increment means that for a receiving district whose combined capital individuals and businesses depending upon geographic location. School districts H.B. 199 School Funding--Wayne A. Yes Yes 5-Feb-09 Cathy 10-Feb-09 levy certified tax rate would be less than 0.002400 the amount of revenue experiencing decreased revenue due to the shift will either reduce budgets or equal to the difference between (1) the amount of revenue that would have Harper increase property tax assessments. been generated by the combined capital levy certified tax rate and (2) the amount of revenue generated by a property tax rate of 0.002400 per dollar of taxable value.

H.B. 202-- School District Traffic Violation Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 6 1 Complaint Procedures--Wayne Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Mar 2009 A. Harper businesses, or local governments.

Concurrent Enrollment Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 207 Amendments--Kory M. Yes Yes 4-Feb-09 Randy 6-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Holdaway businesses, or local governments.

Concurrent Enrollment Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 207 S1 Amendments--Kory M. Yes Yes 10-Feb-09 Randy 12-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Holdaway businesses, or local governments.

The bill is a subset of the first substitute of SB 81, modified only to mimic the Concurrent Enrollment language of the latter bill on allocation. Like the original and the first substitute, Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 207 S2 Amendments--Kory M. Temporary URL Yes 27-Feb-09 Randy 27-Feb-09 this version changes how CE money is allocated between higher and public bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, education, but not how much money is appropriated for CE. Unlike either businesses, or local governments. Holdaway version of SB 81, this bill does not otherwise affect public education.

Implementation of this bill would likely curtail the growth in the number of certain Modification of Exemption from nonimmigrant alien students enrolling in institutions of higher education in the state. This would result in an estimated loss of future tuition revenue of H.B. 208 Nonresident Tuition--Richard Yes Yes approximately $150,000 annually. Nonimmigrant aliens who benefit from paying A. Greenwood resident tuition rates would lose this benefit if they were employed or earned income during the year they claim the exemption from paying nonresident tuition.

Posting of Collective H.B. 210-- Bargaining Agreements by No fiscal impact; smaller school districts may have difficulty Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 3 Yes Yes 3-Feb-09 Von 4-Feb-09 bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, School Districts--Kenneth W. posting agreements to the web due to limited resources. March 2009 businesses, or local governments. Sumsion

Posting of Collective No fiscal impact; smaller school districts may have difficulty posting H.B. 210 S1-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Bargaining Agreements by agreements to the web due to limited resources. The 1st substitute only Passed 3 1 Yes Yes 17-Feb-09 Von 18-Feb-09 bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, School Districts and Charter adds charter schools with the same requirements as school districts. Mar 2009 businesses, or local governments. Schools--Kenneth W. Sumsion Public Service Commission Powers - Area Code H.B. 215 Yes None Published Assignment -- James A. Dunnigan Enactment of this bill will increase revenues to the General Fund by $40,100,000 Tobacco Tax Increase--Paul in FY 2010 and $41,700,000 in FY 2011. Local government sales tax revenue will H.B. 219 Yes increase by a total of $40,000. Businesses dealing in tobacco products will Ray experience a decrease in revenue of $9,000,000. Individuals will see the average price per pack increase by $1.00.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 7 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Enactment of this bill increases the tax on cigarettes, moist snuff, and other tobacco products. This increases revenue to the General Fund by $25,900,000 in FY 2010. Each year the Economic and Statistical Unit of the Utah State Tax Commission will calculate the new tax rate based upon the average tax rate in 44 states and multiplied by a constant. Absent tax changes in other states, this bill Tobacco Tax Increase--Paul increases revenue in FY 2011 by $30,600,000 in that the tax changes in FY 2010 H.B. 219 S1 Yes Ray increase the national average. Local government sales tax revenue will increase by a total of $26,000 in FY 2010 and $31,000 in FY 2011. Businesses dealing in tobacco products will experience a decrease in revenue. Individuals will see the average price per pack increase to the national average in FY 2010. In FY 2011, individuals will see the price per pack increase or decrease depending upon the cigarette tax policy in other states.

H.B. 226-- Disaster Recovery and Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, 1 Passed 11 Emergency Management Yes businesses, or local governments. Feb 2009 Amendments--Curtis Oda

Enactment of this bill raises the sales tax which increases revenue to the Uniform School Fund by $617,000,000 in FY 2011. Revenue to the Education Fund will increase by $7,700,000 because the decreased property tax will not be claimed on income tax returns. Due to the provision related to local replacement for Local taxing entities will be unable to raise property taxes above the certified charter schools, enactment of this bill would free up Uniform School Fund rate. Because of this, and based upon historical data from the legislative appropriations of $35,000,000. Property tax for individuals and businesses will Link to Fiscal Analyst's office, local taxing entities will be unable to raise property decrease by $652,000,000 in FY 2011. Local taxing entities will be unable to raise Public School Funding--Wayne H.B. 229 spreadsheets for Yes Yes 22-Jan-09 Cathy 2-Feb-09 taxes by $71,000,in FY2011. Regarding the uniform fees, school districts could property tax above the certified rate. Because of this, and based upon historical Harper experience a loss of $3,000,000 in FY2011 whereas other local taxing entities information, local taxing entities will be unable to raise property taxes by fiscal note will experience an increase of $3,000,000.‐ On the provision related to the $71,000,000 in FY 2011; businesses and individuals will not experience an Capital Outlay Foundation Program, there will be a shift of approximately $14 increase in property tax of $71,000,000 in FY 2011 that historically would have million to high growth districts from non high growth districts. been paid. On the provision related to the uniform fee, school districts will experience a loss of $3,000,000 in FY 2011 whereas other local taxing entities will experience an increase of $3,000,000. On the provision related to the capital outlay foundation program, there will be a shift of $14,000,000 to high growth districts from non-high growth districts.

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Implementation of There is an unknown potential impact on LEAs and potentially on individual Credit Required in Teacher this bill may result in additional hiring costs to local school districts and charter teachers; a specific impact cannot be derived because each LEA has their H.B. 230 Yes Yes 15-Jan-09 Emily 20-Jan-09 schools. Individual impacts will depend on teacher qualifications and district Transfers--Lorie D. Fowlke own varying hiring policies and procedures. policies. SECOND REVISION: Savings of $28.7 million in FY 2011 (October 2010 Enactment of this bill may delay partial Kindergarten enrollment costs for one Kindergarten Amendments-- enrollment count) due to the decreased cohort entry into Kindergarten for year. ($11,951,000) for FY 2011. Enactment of this bill likely will result in some H.B. 242 Yes Yes 16-Jan-09 Randy 21-Jan-09 delayed costs for districts in their Kindergarten population entering school fall Laura Black children born between July 2005 and June 30, 2006--a 10 month instead of a 12-month period. Savings are approximate 2010.

It is only incidentally about schools and imposes no requirement of any kind on Disruption of School Activities-- any aspect of the public education system. But note lines 38-40, the gist of Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this H.B. 244 Yes Yes 16-Jan-09 Randy 16-Jan-09 which is: "As a part of the sentence for violation of this section, the court shall bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Carol Spackman Moss order the defendant to reimburse the school for costs incurred by the school in businesses, or local governments. responding to the defendant's presence on the school property."

Like the original, this substitute is only incidentally about schools and imposes H.B. 244 S1-- Disruption of School Activities-- no requirement of any kind on any aspect of the public education system. But Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 9 1 Yes Yes 9-Mar-09 Randy 9-Mar-09 note lines 50-52: "As a part of the sentence for violation of this section, the bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Senator Jon J. Greiner court shall order the defendant to reimburse the school for costs incurred by businesses, or local governments. Mar 2009 the school in responding to the defendant's presence on the school property."

H.B. 245-- Utah State 911 Committee Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this Passed 10 1 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Curtis Oda Mar 2009 businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill could lead to a shift of tax burden from the residential property eligible under Property Tax--Residential this exemption to other residential and business properties not eligible for the H.B. 246 Yes Yes Exemption--Gage Froerer exemption. The estimated shift is approximately $28,000,000 with $17,640,000 being shifted to other residential properties and $10,360,000 shifted to businesses and other properties. Property Tax--Residential H.B. 246 S1 Yes Yes None Published Exemption--Gage Froerer Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Property Tax--Residential H.B. 246 S2 Yes Yes bill could lead to a shift of tax burden from the residential property eligible under Exemption--Gage Froerer this exemption to other residential and business properties not eligible for the exemption.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 8 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Regulating the Use of a Enactment of this bill will require $10,000 per year from the General Fund Wireless Communication appropriated to the Courts beginning in FY 2010. The bill will also generate $13,800 per year in new General Fund revenue beginning in FY 2010, for a net H.B. 248 Device While Operating a Yes Yes General Fund increase of $3,800 per year. Enactment of this bill likely will not Motor Vehicle--Carol result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Spackman Moss Local governments through Justice Courts adjudications will benefit. Regulating the Use of a Wireless Communication H.B. 248 S1 Device While Operating a Yes Yes Motor Vehicle--Carol Spackman Moss Continuing Education for Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses H.B. 249 Contractors Amendments--Ron Yes or local governments. Individuals may benefit from reduced educational Bigelow requirements. Continuing Education for Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses H.B. 249 S1 Contractors Amendments--Ron Yes or local governments. Individuals may benefit from reduced educational Bigelow requirements.

H.B. 257-- Political Subdivision Clerk Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this Passed 20 1 Amendments--Merlynn T. Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Feb 2009 Newbold businesses, or local governments. Prohibition of Impact Fees on Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses H,B. 259 School Districts and Charter Yes Yes or local governments. Individuals may benefit from reduced educational Schools--Steve Sandstrom requirement Change to Impact Fees--Steve Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 259 S1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Sandstrom businesses, or local governments. Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this School Employee Termination H.B. 260 Yes Yes 22-Jan-09 Emily 26-Jan-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses Amendments--Carl Wimmer or local governments. Individuals may benefit from reduced educational requirement School Employee Termination Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 260 S1 Yes Yes 13-Feb-09 Emily 17-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Carl Wimmer businesses, or local governments.

Licensing Eligibility--Steven E. Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 262 S1 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Sandstrom businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will require an additional appropriation of $253,900 in FY Insurance Fraud Related 2010 and $207,000 in FY 2011 from Dedicated Credits. The bill will increase Dedicated Credits revenue by $291,900 per year. Enactment of this bill likely will H.B. 263 Assessments-Douglas C. Yes not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for local governments. Aagard Insurance companies will pay higher assessments. This emphasis on fraud may lower insurance costs to businesses and individuals.

Educator Evaluation Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 264 Yes Yes 23-Jan-09 Emily 27-Jan-09 No fiscal impact bill may result in additional costs for some local districts and charter schools Amendments--Ronda Menlove depending on the current evaluation and data systems they have in place.

H.B. 264 S1-- Educator Evaluation Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 27 1 Yes Yes 3-Feb-09 Emily 5-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill may result in additional costs for some local school districts and charter Amendments--Ronda Menlove Feb 2009 schools depending on the current evaluation and data systems they have in place.

Enactment of this bill will require an appropriation of $26,700 from the General Task Force for Legislative Fund in FY 2009 only. Those funds will distributed $8,800 to the Senate and H.B. 282 Yes $17,800 to the House of Representatives. Enactment of this bill likely will not Reform--Neil Hansel result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Illegal Use of Off-highway Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 283 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Vehicles--Michael E. Noel businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 9 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Illegal Use of Motor Vehicles-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 283 S1 Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Michael E. Noel businesses, or local governments.

H.B. 287-- Utah Education Network Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, 1 Passed 5 Amendments -- Kory M. Yes Yes 3-Feb-09 Randy 4-Feb-09 No fiscal impact businesses, or local governments. Mar 2009 Holdaway State School Board Election Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, H.B. 293 Amendments -- Ronda Rudd Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Von 3-Feb-09 No fiscal impact businesses, or local governments. Menlove

Enactment of this bill will require an ongoing appropriation of approximately $120,000 in salary and benefits for one additional associate superintendent for the Schools for the Deaf and Blind Schools for the Deaf and the Blind. It will also require an ongoing appropriation H.B. 296 Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Von 4-Feb-09 No fiscal impact Amendments--Ken Sumsion estimated at $490,000 to fund the Utah State Instructional Materials Access Center. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will require an ongoing appropriation of $490,000 to fund the Utah State Instructional Materials Access Center. The cost of an additional Schools for the Deaf and Blind associate superintendent position, estimated at $120,000 ongoing, is offset within H.B. 296 S1 Yes Yes 13-Feb-09 Von 17-Feb-09 No fiscal impact Amendments--Ken Sumsion the bill by the repeal of Utah Code Title 53A-25-108, which includes a treasurer position. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Independent Contractor Numbered H.B. 305 Database Amendments-- Ron without any Yes Bigelow Substance

Enactment of this bill could reduce the General Fund by $46,500 annually. Utah State Railroad Museum Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or H.B. 311 Yes benefits for individuals. Businesses providing services to the newly established Authority--Neil A. Hansen authority would receive a potential sales tax benefit. Local governments could see reduction in sales tax revenue of $15,000 annually.

Enactment of this bill could reduce the General Fund by $46,500 annually. Utah State Railroad Museum Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or H.B. 311 S1 Yes benefits for individuals. Businesses providing services to the newly established Authority--Neil A. Hansen authority would receive a potential sales tax benefit. Local governments could see reduction in sales tax revenue of $15,000 annually.

Local School Governance No fiscal impact; however several legal issues are Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 315 Amendments--Kenneth Yes Yes 4-Feb-09 Randy 6-Feb-09 bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, problematic Sumsion businesses, or local governments. Construction Trades Licensing Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 318 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Brad S. King businesses, or local governments.

H.B. 319-- Disaster Recovery and Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 27 1 Emergency Management Yes 9-Feb-09 Jenefer 9-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Feb 2009 Amendments--Curtis Oda businesses, or local governments.

H.B. 323-- Amendments Regarding Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 10 1 Notice on Utah Public Notice Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Mar 2009 Website--Bradley A. Wynn businesses, or local governments.

Building Inspector Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals H.B. 327 Amendments--Douglas C. Yes and businesses. Local governments may be impacted due to this proposed Aagard change in statute.

Enactment of this bill will appropriate $300,000 ongoing from the Uniform School Teacher Quality Amendments-- H.B. 328 Yes Yes 5-Feb-09 Randy 9-Feb-09 $300,000 USF to the State Board of Education Fund. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or Gregory H. Hughes benefits for individuals or businesses. Local school districts will receive the grants outlined in the bill.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 10 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Estimated costs for "Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards" averaged in these ranges: Elementary Schools & Miscellaneous Enactment of this bill will appropriate $500,000 one-time from the General Fund Utah School Seismic Hazard Educations Facilities $1,500 - $2,000; Junior High Schools & District for FY 2010 and includes non-lapsing authority. Enactment of this bill likely will not H.B. 330 Yes Yes 9-Feb-09 Jenefer 10-Feb-09 Inventory--Larry B. Wiley Administrative Buildings $2,500-3,000; High Schools $5,000-6000. Estimated result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or Total Based on Averages $1,763,825; only $500,000 one-time funding is local governments. proposed in this bill. Amount appropriated: $500,000 from the General Fund

No fiscal impact. Line 50 repeals a current direct writing assessment for Writing Assessment and grades 6 and 9 and replaces it with an online writing assessment for grades 5 Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 334 Instruction--Merlynn T. Yes Yes 18-Feb-09 Emily 19-Feb-09 and 8. It only changes the grades and changes the test from written form to bill may require some additional costs for school districts and charter schools online. One test would just replace the other; depending on the online capabilities they have in place. Newbold therefore, an appropriation is not needed.

Enactment of this bill will appropriate $500,000 one-time from the General Fund Capital Project Amendments-- H.B. 354 Yes for FY 2010 and includes non-lapsing authority. Enactment of this bill likely will not Stephen D. Clark result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Teacher Certification Title Without any H.B. 358 Amendments--Eric K. Yes Yes Substance Hutchings

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations and may result in a Assuming that educational agencies are already properly managing their Government Records minimal increase in fee revenue to state agencies. Enactment of this bill likely will records, implementation of this bill will not require additional expenditures. The not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses; though local H.B. 362 Amendments--Gregory H. Yes 26-Feb-09 Randy 27-Feb-09 provision for charging fees more in line with the actual cost of responding to governments may receive a minimal increase in fee revenue and certain extensive records requests may even be helpful. Hughes individuals may be charged additional records access fees.

Some institutions in the Utah System of Higher Education may see an increase in the number of students enrolled because they may be eligible for the tuition waivers or scholarships. This would result in an increase in revenue collections on H.B. 364-- Border and Nonresident those campuses. There could also be an offsetting decrease in revenue Passed10 1 Student Amendments--Don L. Yes collections if students who would have otherwise enrolled and paid nonresident tuition now receive one of these waivers or scholarships. The impact will be Mar 2009 Ipson determined by how many new students enroll and how many waivers and scholarships are awarded. Students who are eligible for tuition waivers will benefit from not paying nonresident tuition.

Enactment of this bill could decrease the General Fund by $121,300 in FY 2010 Circuit Breaker Amendments-- and by $124,900 in FY 2011. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, H.B. 378 Yes Tim Cosgrove measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses, or local governments. Some lower income taxpayers could receive a reduction in property taxes owed.

This bill requires that districts be reimbursed when employees are on unpaid Public Education Law Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations Enactment of this association leave. Either the individual district employee, an association, or bill may result in some cost savings or revenues for school districts and charter H.B. 381 Revisions--Association Leave-- Yes Yes 23-Feb-09 Emily 24-Feb-09 union can pay for the reimbursement. If a teacher is on unpaid association schools due to reimbursement provisions as outlined in the bill. Christopher N. Herrod leave, this could result in reimbursement of approximately $430 per day

Budgetary Procedures Act Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 391 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Revisions--Ron Bigelow businesses, or local governments.

Uniform Building Code Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 394 Commission Amendments-- Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Carl Wimmer businesses, or local governments.

Education Building Projects Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 409 Zoning Exemption Yes Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Amendments--Carl Wimmer businesses, or local governments. H.B. 413 S1-- County Authority Amendments-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Passed 10 1 Yes bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Ronda Rudd Menlove Mar 2009 businesses, or local governments.

Provisions of this bill are estimated to increase annual expenditures by the Eminent Domain Modifications-- H.B. 414 Yes Department of Transportation by an average of $4,515,000 from the Craig A. Frank Transportation Fund. Local governments could have increased expenses as they exercise eminent domain proceedings and are subject to provisions of this bill.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 11 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongoing Current as of: 3/10/2009 at 9:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the House and Senate are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S Bill Number Link to USOE Approval t Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note a Links Received LFA in RED) t Status in Place Completed u s Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this Delinquent Property Tax bill could increase local revenues by up to $50,000,000 depending on penalties H.B. 418 Yes Amendments--Gage Froerer assessed. There will be a corresponding increase in cost to individuals and businesses that are delinquent in their taxes.

No fiscal impact. This bill is amended to make sure a school district or charter Carson Smith Scholarship school sends out appropriate notices no later than 30 days after a student Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.B. 425 Program Amendments-- Yes Yes 17-Feb-09 Cathy 18-Feb-09 qualifies for an IEP. This bill also directs the school districts and charter bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, schools to post an address of the Internet that provides detailed program businesses, or local governments. Merlynn T. Newbold information and application forms. These requirements can be handled

2010 Appropriations Act-- Title Without any H.B. 442 Yes Yes David Litvack Substance

Healthy Family Partnership Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of this H.C.R. 2 Concurrent Resolution--Curtis Yes Yes 13-Jan-09 Emily 15-Jan-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Oda businesses, or local governments. Joint Resolution Revising Publication and distribution costs to put this resolution on the ballot will require a one-time FY 2011 appropriation of $14,700 from the General Fund. Enactment of H.J.R. 6 Property Tax Exemption-- Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Patrick Painter individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Joint Resolution Expressing H.J.R. 11-- Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or Support for and Recognizing benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments. Enactment of this bill Passed 3 1 Yes Yes 3-Feb-09 Randy 5-Feb-09 No fiscal impact the Value of Locally Elected likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Mar 2009 businesses, or local governments. Officials--Melvin R. Brown

Joint Resolution--Teacher Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this H.J.R. 13 Performance Pay--Marie H. Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Emily 4-Feb-09 No fiscal impact bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Poulson businesses, or local governments.

Know people who would like this service? To subscribe or unsubscribe visit: https://lists.uen.org/mailman/listinfo/usoe_daily_fiscal_note_summary

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 12 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM FISCAL NOTE LOG--SENATE BILLS 2009 Tuesday, March 10, 2009 Link to 2009 Legislature General Session Numbered Bills and Resolutions Link to 2009 Legislation Governor Actions Link to Bills and Bill Requests by Sponsor, Subject or Committee Link to Legislative Calendars Link to Weekly Schedules of House and Senate Link to Recorded Senate Floor Debates USOE Fiscal Note Input Web Site Senate and House Calendar Displays New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s This bill appropriates $8,513,980,850, including $2,319,612,950 from S.B. 2-- New Fiscal Year Supplemental general and education funds, for the use and support of state agencies and Passed 10 1 Appropriations Act--Lyle W. Yes Yes higher education institutions for Fiscal Year 2010. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Mar 2009 Hillyard individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Appropriations Adjustments-- Introduced by S.B. 3 Yes Yes Lyle W. Hillyard Short Title

S.B. 4-- Current Fiscal Year Passed 2 Feb Supplemental Minimum School Net reduction to the MSP of $59,404,100 2009--Signed 2 Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Cathy 2/5/2009 Program Budget Amendments-- for FY 2008-09 only by Governor Howard Stephenson 9-Feb 2009

Department of Community and Enactment of this bill would require costs in the first year of $33,000 and annual funding beginning in FY 2010 of $24,600 Enactment of this bill likely S.B. 10 Culture--State-Owned Art Yes Yes will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, Inventory--Mark Madsen businesses, or local governments.

Financial Incentives for Motion Enactment of this bill could reduce the Education Fund by $7,793,700 annually. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable S.B. 14 Picture Productions--Lyle W. Yes costs and/or benefits for local governments. Businesses could receive Hillyard refundable tax credits equal to 20 percent of the costs of in-state production.

Implementation of this bill will require $70,400 one-time in FY 2011 for a temporary Financial Analyst II Division of Finance. Specific costs will Utah Transparency Advisory depend on what information cities, towns, counties, school districts, and $5.9 million for FY 2009 current year; and special service districts currently keep; whether that information is currently S.B. 18 Board Amendments--Sen Yes Yes 2-Dec-08 Von 9-Dec-08 $2.02 million for FY 2010 and FY 2011 available to the public; and what specific financial information the Utah Wayne Neiderhauser Transparency Advisory Board requires to be posted to the internet. Businesses and individuals may receive certain benefits from the ability to view state and local government financial and contractual data online.

Implementation of this bill will require $70,400 one-time in FY 2010 and FY 2011 for a temporary Financial Analyst II in the Division of Finance and may require an additional appropriation of $24,000 per 100 non-state entities The bill has been changed from the original and allows districts that choose to use the State's transparency website. Specific costs will Utah Transparency Advisory to post information to the state operated and supported web depend on what information cities, towns, counties, school districts, and site. If a district chooses to host the data and search engines S.B. 18 S1 Board Amendments--Sen Yes Yes 29-Jan-09 Von 30-Jan-09 special service districts currently keep; whether that information is currently on it's own web-site the cost would be borne locally--about available to the public; and what specific financial information the Utah Wayne Neiderhauser $336 Transparency Advisory Board requires to be posted to the internet. Businesses and individuals may receive certain benefits from the ability to view state and local government financial and contractual data online.

S.B. 26-- Open and Public Meetings Act-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of Passed 5 Feb 1 Meeting Record--Peter Yes Yes 16-Jan-09 Von 20-Jan-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 2009 Knudson individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 13 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Enactment of this bill will require an additional appropriation of $1,900,000 from various funds as shown in the table in order to pay for increased Insurance Coverage for Autism coverage of autism spectrum disorders. Local governments may be impacted if they provide health insurances to employees. Businesses that S.B. 43 Spectrum Disorders - Clay's Yes Yes purchase health insurance may see increase in the cost of insurance. Law -- Howard Stephenson Individuals may benefit from the additional coverage that is provided under the proposed change in statute. Uniform School Fund: FY 22009--$0; FY 2010--$88,600; FY 2011--$88,600

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. By eliminating provisions for a county-wide pool of capital outlay property tax School Property Tax Eliminates potential property tax revenue loss to Salt revenues, enactment of this bill may increase or decrease the amount of Lake County school districts which do not increase capital outlay property tax revenues a school district in a county of the first S.B. 46 Equalization Amendments-- Yes Yes 23-Jan-09 Cathy 27-Jan-09 tax rates to make up for revenue sent to another class receives. The total increase or decrease is dependent on a district's Karen Morgan school district. allocation of property tax revenues from the county-wide pool in relation to the amount of property tax revenue a school district can generate based on the value of property within its jurisdiction.

This first substitute requires that a "receiving" school district deposit capital outlay increment monies in a separate account which can only be used for new school building construction Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. A school School Property Tax and not for renovations or remodeling of existing buildings or district, in a county of the first class, that meets the criteria established in facilities. Before the receiving school district expends any of S.B. 46 S1 Equalization Amendments-- Temporary URL Yes 5-Mar-09 Cathy 6-Mar-09 this bill may incur additional costs associated with the advertising and public the capital outlay increment monies, the "receiving" school hearing requirements outlined in the bill. Karen W. Morgan district shall provide notice and conduct a public hearing at which the "receiving" school district adopts a budget for the expenditure of the capital outlay increment monies.

This second substitute eliminates the requirement for "receiving" school districts to conduct a public hearing at which the "receiving" school district adopts a budget for the expenditure of the capital outlay increment monies. Not only is a school district required to separately budget and account for the capital outlay increment monies, but this second substitute requires those school districts to submit copies of an audit on School Property Tax the use of those capital outlay increment monies and to submit Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 46 S2 Equalization Amendments-- Temporary URL Yes 9-Mar-09 Cathy 10-Mar-09 copies of that audit to the county treasurer, the State Office of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Education (USOE), and the superintendents of each of the individuals, businesses, or local governments. Karen W. Morgan contributing school districts within the "receiving" school district's county. USOE is then required to determine if a "receiving" school district spent the funds appropriately. If so, the "receiving" school district shall return their share of the capital outlay increment monies to the county treasurer and the county treasurer shall redistribute those funds. Subject to appropriation and a General Fund surplus, enactment of this bill would allow municipalities to apply for a grant from surplus funds. Enactment of this bill will require an appropriation to the State Auditor of $36,000 for half of an FTE. Enactment of this bill may increase revenue to Grant in Lieu of Property Tax local governments by as much as $1,000,000. The transfer to the local S.B. 47 Yes governments would only happen if funds are appropriated and there is Act--Gene Davis eligible surplus in the General Fund. Individuals and businesses may experience an increase or decrease in property tax of $1,000,000 depending upon whether an eligible municipality decreases property tax for the funds received. County assessors will experience an increase in workload. Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. If only one county has an eligible municipality, then this bill would increase the property County Regional Facilities tax by $1,000,000. For each county with an eligible municipality, the S.B. 47 S1 Yes property tax increases by $1,000,000. In a county of the first class, the Property Tax--Gene Davis $1,000,000 property tax increase would mean a shift of $979,000 between those taxing entities that pay the property tax and those taxing entities that receive the tax. There may be increased costs to the county assessor.

Enactment of this bill may increase costs at the Utah State Office of Education associated with verifying applicants seeking a competency-based teaching license as outlined in the bill. Increased workload is estimated to Teacher Competency require an additional 0.5 FTE at a cost of $25,500; however the costs are S.B.48 Yes Yes 28-Jan-09 Emily 29-Jan-09 No fiscal impact on USF funded by educator licensing fees rather than USF funds. Bill provisions Amendments--D. Chris Buttars require a fee be paid by the applicant to cover the costs associated with granting the license. Individuals seeking a competency-based teaching license may be required to pay a fee to cover the costs associated with issuing the license.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 14 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Governor's Interagency Enactment of this bill will require the Department of Workforce Services to Coordinating Council on Health spend $2,300 per year in General Funds beginning FY 2010. The S.B. 55 Yes 30-Jan-09 Von 3-Feb-09 No fiscal impact Department believes it can handle this expenditure within existing Disparities and Economic Self- resources. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable sufficiency--Luz Robles costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill would have no impact of current revenue. However, Military Installation the bill authorizes a diversion of 50 percent of the sales tax revenue collected in the designated Military Authority zone. This could have an Development Authority impact on future General Fund revenues once the zone is established. S.B. 56 Yes Amendments--Sheldon L. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Local governments could see a shift Killpack in property tax revenue between tax types as a result of the property tax increments established in the bill.

Enactment of this bill would have no impact of current revenue. However, Military Installation the bill authorizes a diversion of 50 percent of the sales tax revenue collected in the designated Military Authority zone. This could have an Development Authority S.B. 56 S1 Yes impact on future General Fund revenues once the zone is established. Amendments--Sheldon L. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Local governments could see a shift Killpack in property tax revenue between tax types as a result of the property tax increments established in the bill.

Enactment of this bill would have no impact of current revenue. However, Military Installation the bill authorizes a diversion of 50 percent of the sales tax revenue S.B. 56 S2-- collected in the designated Military Authority zone. This could have an Development Authority impact on future General Fund revenues once the zone is established. Passed 6 Mar 1 Yes Amendments--Sheldon L. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or 2009 benefits for individuals or businesses. Local governments could see a shift Killpack in property tax revenue between tax types as a result of the property tax increments established in the bill. Home School and Private School Students' Participation Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 61 Yes Yes 5-Feb-09 Von 9-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for in Extracurricular Activities-- individuals, businesses, or local governments. Senator Mark B. Madsen

Administrative Rules Review Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 64 Committee--Howard A. Yes Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Stephenson individuals, businesses, or local governments. Amendments to Property Tax There is no fiscal impact to school districts. This bill would Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Local taxing Notice, Public Hearing, and impact calendar entities (NOT school districts) by giving them entities may experience decreased or increased costs to increase property S.B. 65 Yes Yes 19-Feb-09 Cathy 23-Feb-09 options if they desire to levy a tax rate that exceeds the Resolution Provisions--Senator taxes. Individuals and businesses are unaffected. calendar year taxing entity's certified tax rate. Dennis E. Stowell Amendments to Property Tax The main change in this first substitute is including coordinating clauses for HB23, Certified Tax Rate Amendments, HB 67, Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Local taxing Notice, Public Hearing, and Public Hearings on Property Tax Increases, and SB 208, Utah entities may experience decreased or increased costs to increase property S.B. 65 S1 Yes Yes 9-Mar-09 Cathy 10-Mar-09 Public Notice Website. SB 208 would require entities to publish Resolution Provisions--Senator taxes. Individuals and businesses are unaffected. the hearing notice on a website, which may require a cost to Dennis E. Stowell maintain the web site.

Mining Protection Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 68 Amendments--Sheldon Yes Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Killpack individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Mining Protection Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 68 S1 Amendments--Sheldon Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Killpack individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Assuming that LEAs must pay for the mandated training and that the training is one-time, and knowing that only 9 districts and 1 charter school currently receive "At Risk - Gang At-Risk Student Provisions-- Prevention" funding (because it is, by statute, which this bill Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 74 Yes Yes 18-Feb-09 Randy 20-Feb-09 does not change, this bill may result in additional costs to school districts and charter schools Luz Robles competitively awarded and requires matching funds), an associated with the faculty and staff training provisions outlined in the bill. estimated $2.5 million beyond the current (FY 2009) level of gang prevention funding would be required for FY 2010 (allowing it to be carried forward) to provide the training.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 15 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Grants for American Board Distinguished Teacher certification Grants for Licensed Teachers is included in this current bill, but was not included in years Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 77 Amendments--Senator Mark B. Yes Yes 5-Feb-09 Emily 9-Feb-09 past. The balance remaining from the previous grant program this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for was eliminated during the special session of the Legislature in individuals, businesses, or local governments. Madsen September.

Health Reform - Medical Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for S.B. 79 Malpractice Amendments-- Yes 5-Feb-09 Randy 9-Feb-09 No fiscal impact individuals and local governments. Businesses may be impacted due to Peter C. Knudson changes in the proposed statute.

Health Reform - Medical Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for S.B. 79 S1 Malpractice Amendments-- Temporary URL Yes individuals and local governments. Businesses may be impacted due to John L. Valentine changes in the proposed statute.

Health Reform - Medical Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for S.B. 79 S2 Malpractice Amendments-- Yes individuals and local governments. Businesses may be impacted due to Peter C. Knudson changes in the proposed statute.

S.B. 79 S3-- Health Reform - Medical Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 1 Passed 10 Malpractice Amendments-- Yes individuals and local governments. Businesses may be impacted due to Mar 2009 Peter C. Knudson changes in the proposed statute.

Enrollment Program Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 81 Amendments---Margaret Yes Yes 4-Feb-09 Randy 6-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Dayton individuals, businesses, or local governments.

S.B. 81 S1-- Concurrent Enrollment Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 5 Mar 1 Program Amendments-- Yes Yes 20-Feb-09 Randy 24-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 2009 Margaret Dayton individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. However, in some cases where delays occur in construction projects, this bill could Condemnation Amendments-- increase the state's property acquisition costs and legal fees. Enactment of S.B. 83 Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Dennis E. Stowell businesses or local governments. Land owners may benefit by being able to file an action to set aside the condemnation acquisition if the state does meet conditions in the bill.

S.B. 83 S4-- Condemnation Amendments-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 10 1 Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Dennis E. Stowell Mar 2009 individuals, businesses, or local governments.

S.B. 88-- Administrative Rulemaking Act Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of Passed 12- 1 Amendments--Howard A. Yes Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Feb 2009 Stephenson individuals, businesses, or local governments.

S.B. 92-- Local Governmental Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of Passed 13 1 Cooperation in Education Yes Yes 13-Jan-09 Von 15-Jan-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Feb 2009 Matters--Pat Jones individuals, businesses, or local governments. Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 94-- Underground Sewer Utilities this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Passed 23 1 Facilities Amendments--Jon J. Yes local governments. Enactment of this bill may affect individuals and businesses that may be required to create and maintain records of sewer Feb 2009 Greiner utility facilities.

S.B. 100-- Financial and Economic Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of Passed 19 1 Literacy Education Yes Yes 14-Jan-09 Randy 15-Jan-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Feb 2009 Amendments--Pat Jones individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 16 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

S.B. 104-- Higher Education Scholarship Implementation of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Some Passed 13 1 Program Amendments--Lyle Yes Yes students may be impacted by the modified requirements to receive a Feb 2009 Hillyard scholarship.

S.B. 105-- Engineering and Computer Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of Passed 11 1 Science Initiative Amendments- Yes Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Feb 2009 -Lyle Hillyard individuals, businesses, or local governments. Local School Funding S.B. 109 Legislative Task Force--Chris Yes Buttars Delaying the implementation date of Senate Bill 81, 2008 General Session, will delay the fiscal impact that is currently in the FY 2010 base until FY Delayed Effective Date of 2011.Individuals who are not in this country legally and currently receiving state services would not lose those services until FY 2011. Local Health S.B. 113 Illegal Immigration Legislation-- Yes Departments could delay expanding their workforces to determine Pat Jones citizenship and eligibility until FY 2011. Business that may incur additional costs associated with administering payroll and withholding taxes would not realize those costs until FY 2011.

Enacting this bill will increase taxes on cigarettes, moist snuff, and other tobacco related products by $53,900,000 in FY 2010. In FY 2011, $54,440,000 will be raised by the tax increase, $53,900,000 of which is deposited into the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Restricted Account. The balance accrues to the General Fund. The bill also changes current earmarks; there is an increase to Huntsman Cancer Institute by $2,300,000; Tobacco Tax Amendments-- an increase to the University of Utah School of Medicine by $600,000; and a S.B. 114 Yes Allen M. Christensen decrease to the Department of Health by $600,000. The remaining $51,600,000 must be spent on health-related programs. Local government sales tax revenue will increase by a total of $60,000. Revenues to businesses dealing in tobacco products will decrease by $45,000,000. Individuals will see the price per pack of cigarette increase by $1.30; the price per ounce of moist snuff increase by $1.40; and the tax rate for other tobacco products increase from 35% to 88%. Tobacco Tax Amendments-- S.B. 114 S1 Yes None Published Allen M. Christensen Tobacco Tax Amendments-- S.B. 114 S2 Yes Allen M. Christensen School District Division Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of S.B. 123 Yes Yes 27-Jan-09 Cathy 28-Jan-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Process--Lyle Hillyard individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Indemnification for Design Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations; Enactment of S.B. 124 Professional Services--Gregory Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for S. Bell individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Indemnification for Design Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 124 S1 Professional Services--Gregory Temporary URL Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for S. Bell individuals, businesses, or local governments.

S.B. 124 S2-- Indemnification for Design Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 4 Mar 1 Professional Services--Gregory Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 2009 S. Bell individuals, businesses, or local governments.

State Personnel Management Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 126 Act Amendments--Daniel R. Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Liljenquist individuals, businesses, or local governments.

S.B. 126 S1-- State Personnel Management Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Gov Signed 1 Act Amendments--Daniel R. Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 18 Feb 2009 Liljenquist individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 17 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Local taxing entities that may be affected include cemetery maintenance districts, drainage districts, fire protection districts, improvement districts, metropolitan water districts, mosquito abatement districts, public transit districts, service areas, and water conservancy districts. If these local taxing Local District Taxing Authority-- entities change their board structure to be an elected board, then S.B. 135 Yes Curtis S. Bramble individuals, businesses, and local taxing entities are unaffected. If certain local taxing entities do not change their board structure to be an elected board, then some individuals and businesses will likely experience a tax decrease and/or will not experience tax increases. In this case, certain local taxing entities would be unable to raise property tax revenue. Enactment of this legislation may increase borrowing costs for local taxing entities.

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Local taxing entities that may be affected include cemetary service areas, water service areas, road service areas, and other service areas. If these local taxing S.B. 135 S1-- Local District Taxing Authority-- entities change their board structure to be an elected board, then Passed 26 1 Yes individuals, businesses, and local taxing entities are unaffected. If certain Curtis S. Bramble local taxing entities do not change their board structure to be an elected Feb 2009 board, then some individuals and businesses will likely experience a tax decrease and/or will not experience tax increases. In this case, certain local taxing entities would be unable to raise property tax revenue.

S.B. 139-- Employer Election Retirement Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 27 1 Amendments--Curtis S. Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Feb 2009 Bramble individuals, businesses, or local governments.

S.B. 146-- Home Schooling Amendments- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 10 1 Yes Yes 2-Feb-09 Randy 2-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for -Mark B. Madsen Mar 2009 individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Corrections and the Board of Pardons will require General Funds of $29,700 in FY 2009 and $59,400 in FY 2010. Costs to Corrections and the Board will increase by $29,700 annually in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 and Prohibition of Text Messaging will stabilize at $133,800 in FY 2014 and each fiscal year thereafter. The Courts will require $7,000 ongoing General Funds beginning in FY 2010. or Electronic Mail The Department of Public Safety will spend $3,000 one-time Restricted S.B. 149 Yes Communication While Driving-- Funds for programming which can be handled within the Department's existing budget. The bill will generate $7,200 per year in new General Fund Lyle W. Hillyard revenue beginning FY 2010. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Local governments will be impacted by additional adjudications and incarcerations. Corrections and the Board of Pardons will require General Funds of $29,700 in FY 2009 and $59,400 in FY 2010. Costs to Corrections and the Board will increase by $29,700 annually in fiscal years 2012 and 2013 and Prohibition of Text Messaging will stabilize at $133,800 in FY 2014 and each fiscal year thereafter. The Courts will require $7,000 ongoing General Funds beginning in FY 2010. or Electronic Mail The Department of Public Safety will spend $3,000 one-time Restricted S.B. 149 S1 Yes Communication While Driving-- Funds for programming which can be handled within the Department's existing budget. The bill will generate $7,200 per year in new General Fund Lyle W. Hillyard revenue beginning FY 2010. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or businesses. Local governments will be impacted by additional adjudications and incarcerations.

S.B. 153-- County and Municipal Land Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 5 Mar 1 Use Amendments--Mark B. Yes Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 2009 Madsen individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Of the total appropriation of $1,750,000, $1,000,000 is to be used to provide award grants to school districts and charter Enactment of this bill appropriates $1,750,000 in ongoing Uniform School Math Education Initiative-- schools to adopt Singapore math and contract with an Funds to the State Board of Education to implement the Math Education S.B. 159 Yes Yes 3-Feb-09 Cathy 6-Feb-09 independent , qualified evaluator to evaluate the effect of Initiative outlined in the bill. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in Howard Stephenson instruction in Singapore math on student achievement; and direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local $750,000 of the total appropriation to award grants for math governments. teacher training programs.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 18 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Of the total appropriation of $500,000, the State Board of Enactment of this bill appropriates $500,000 in ongoing Uniform School Math Education Initiative-- Education is to award grants of up to $150 per student for the Funds to the State Board of Education to implement the Math Education S.B. 159 S1 Yes Yes Cathy 12-Feb-09 portion of a school district's or charter school's kindergarten Initiative outlined in the bill. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in Howard Stephenson through grade eight enrollment that participates in the Math direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals, businesses, or local Education Initiative for the first time. governments.

Signage Requirements S.B. 175 Relating to Children in Parked Yes None Published Cars--Karen Mayne

Signage Requirements Expected costs to schools: $498,000; State Buildings: S.B. 175 S1 Relating to Children in Parked Temporary URL Yes 9-Feb-09 Von 10-Feb-09 $186,200; Child Care Centers: $67,250--for one-time purchase Cars--Karen Mayne of signs and installation.

Signage Requirements S.B. 175 S2 Relating to Children in Parked Temporary URL Yes Cars--Karen Mayne

New School District Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 177 Yes Yes 6-Feb-09 Von 9-Feb-09 No fiscal impact to the State this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Amendments--D. Chris Buttars individuals, businesses, or local governments. No fiscal impact; The restrictions are already in code. This bill raises limits from $100,000 to $500,000, from $500,000 to $1,000,000 and from $1,000,000 to $5,000,000 for reviews. S.B. 185-- Federal Education Agreement Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of The responsibility for approval is also moved form the 1 this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Passed 10 Requirements Amendments-- Yes Yes 18-Feb-09 Von 19-Feb-09 Legislative Management Committee to the Executive individuals, businesses, or local governments. Mar 2009 Margaret Dayton Appropriations Committee. It also more clearly defines what "cost" is intended to include.

Enactment of this bill could decrease revenue to the Education Fund by Amendments to State Tax $1,525,000 in FY 2009, $2,970,000 in FY 2010, and $3,146,000 in FY 2011. S.B.186 Commission Penalty Yes Yes Individuals and businesses that do not file returns on time could experience a decrease in penalties paid by $1,525,000 in FY 2009, $2,970,000 in FY Provisions -- Stephenson, H. 2010, and $3,146,000 in FY 2011. Local entities are likely unaffected.

Enactment of this bill would yield a one-time savings of approximately This bill would have no fiscal impact but could save the state $32,230,000 from various funds as shown in the LFA Fiscal Note table. Of Public Employee Defined some money if there were a tie between amounts paid by that savings, $28,644,700 is in the General and Education funds. The S.B. 195 Contribution Amendments-- Yes Yes 26-Feb-09 Von 27-Feb-09 school districts and funding. Since the SS & Retirement line Education Fund one time impact is ($25,938,800). Enactment of this bill items are not tied to actual expense it may not impact any likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Daniel R. Liljenquist savings. businesses or local governments. Some individuals may be impacted due to this change the proposed statute.

Enactment of this bill would yield a one-time savings of approximately Public Employee Defined Standing This bill would have no fiscal impact but could save the state $12,925,500 from various funds as shown in the table. Of that savings, S.B. 195 some money if there were a tie between amounts paid by $11,506,000 is in the General and Education funds. The Education Fund Contribution Amendments-- Committee Yes Yes 3-Mar-09 Von 3-Mar-09 school districts and funding. Since the SS & Retirement line one time impact is ($12,969,400). Enactment of this bill likely will not result Amended items are not tied to actual expense it may not impact any in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for businesses or local Daniel R. Liljenquist Amendment savings. governments. Some individuals may be impacted due to this change the proposed statute.

Equal Recognition of School Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 199 Parent Groups--Curtis S. Yes Yes 10-Feb-09 Von 11-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Bramble individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Equal Recognition of School Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 199 S1 Parent Groups--Curtis S. Yes Yes 25-Feb-09 Von 25-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Bramble individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 19 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of this bill extends for five years the tax increment amount of industrial sites and inactive airports that can be diverted from local taxing entities. Certain Redevelopment Agency individuals could be impacted in that this bill could reduce the number of S.B. 205 Amendments--Curtis S. Yes low income housing units created annually; the housing provision could also shorten the time period of projects. On the provision related to Bramble telecommunication facilities, this may decrease the bonding ability of the agencies referred to in the bill; this provision may also provide more price competition between service providers. Assignment of Officials for Introduced by S.B. 206 High School Athletic Activities-- Yes Yes Short Title Mark B. Madsen Enactment of this bill would require an appropriation from Dedicated Credits of $257,000 annually to the Division of State Archives to develop and While this bill has no fiscal impact on government entities, it maintain the program and website expansion required in the bill. The Public Notice Website does make a fundamental change on information and its Division of State Archives will charge fees to cover their costs. There are S.B. 208 Amendments--Stephen H. Yes Yes 20-Feb-09 Von 23-Feb-09 availability. Some groups such as those with either low potential costs savings of approximately $100,000 to state agencies which computer skills or poorer internet access may become more will no longer have to pay costs for certain newspaper advertisements. Urquhart disenfranchised from government. Local governments could see advertising costs savings of up to $500,000. Newspapers could see a decrease in advertising revenue as a result of this legislation. No impact is anticipated on individuals.

Enactment of this bill would require an appropriation from Dedicated Credits of $257,000 annually to the Division of State Archives to develop and maintain the program and website expansion required in the bill. The Public Notice Website Division of State Archives will charge fees to cover their costs. There are S.B. 208 S1 Amendments--Stephen H. Yes Yes potential costs savings of approximately $100,000 to state agencies which will no longer have to pay costs for certain newspaper advertisements. Urquhart Local governments could see advertising costs savings of up to $500,000. Newspapers could see a decrease in advertising revenue as a result of this legislation. No impact is anticipated on individuals.

Enactment of this bill would require an appropriation from Dedicated Credits of $188,900 in FY 2011 and $377,700 annually thereafter to the Division of State Archives to develop and maintain the program and website expansion Public Notice Website required in the bill. The Division of State Archives will charge fees to cover their costs. There are potential costs savings beginning in FY 2012 of S.B. 208 S2 Amendments--Stephen H. Yes Yes approximately $100,000 to state agencies which will no longer have to pay Urquhart costs for certain newspaper advertisements. Local governments could see advertising costs savings of up to $500,000 beginning in FY 2012. Newspapers could see a decrease in advertising revenue as a result of this legislation. No impact is anticipated on individuals.

Land Use, Development and Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 209 Management Act Amendments- Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for -Gregory S. Bell individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Businesses S.B. 210-- operating aircraft will likely experience a decrease in property tax liability of Amendments to Property Tax-- $3,600,000. Individuals and businesses not operating aircraft will likely Passed 10 1 Yes Curtis S. Bramble experience an increase in property tax of $3,600,000. On a $250,000 home, Mar 2009 the expected tax increase would be $0.01. On a $1,000,000 business, the tax increase would be $0.70. Local taxing entities are unaffected.

Building Code Amendments-- Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.B. 211 Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Curtis S. Bramble individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Enactment of this bill will require a one-time appropriation from the Construction Payment Commerce Service Fund of $50,000 in FY 2010. This will reduce the transfer to the General Fund by $50,000. Enactment of this bill likely will not S.B. 230 Amendments--Curtis S. Yes result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals. Local Bramble governments and businesses may be impacted due to the proposed changes in the statute.

Enactment of this bill increases the registration fees on vehicles by $1 until Motor Vehicle Registration the end of FY 2012. These fees increase revenue as a nonlapsing S.B. 234 Yes dedicated credit to the Utah State Tax Commission by $2,620,000 in FY Fees--Ralph Okerlund 2010 and $2,676,000 in FY 2011. Registration fees charged individuals and businesses will increase by $1. Local taxing entities are unaffected.

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 20 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx Status: 2009 General Session--Ongong Current as of: 3/10/20099:04 PM New Bills Added since this Document was last Published are Highlighted in Green New Fiscal Note Input from USOE to LFA Added since this Document was last Published is Highlighted in Blue Bills Passed by the Senate and House are Highlighted in Pumpkin Bills Signed by Governor or Allowed to Become Law without Signature are Highlighted in Yellow S t Bill Number Link USOE Approval a Other Notes and Date Date Sent to (Appropriations Bill Title to Bill Tracking Required/ Assigned to USOE Fiscal Note LFA Fiscal Note t Links Received LFA in RED) u Status in Place Completed s

Assuming that all districts spent 65% of their general fund Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. School Instructional Expenses expenditures in the instruction function, in FY 2008 $6.2 districts that do not meet the minimum instructional expenditure threshold Note Input million of the amounts were spent in other areas by eight outlined in the bill will need to adjust their general fund expenditures to meet S.B. 241 Requirements--Mark B. Yes Yes 23-Feb-09 Von 24-Feb-09 Spreadsheet school districts who do not already meet the 65% requirement this target, or apply for a waiver from the State Board of Education. In FY Madsen of this bill; charter schools are not required to meet this 2008, approximately 8 school districts did not meet this minimum standard. instructional expenditure threshold. School Amendments--D. Chris Introduced by S.B. 246 Yes Yes Buttars Short Title Gift Card Amendments-- S.B. 270 Yes Yes Wayne Niederhauser

Enactment of this bill will reduce state revenues by $100,000 in FY 2010 and by $110,000 in FY 2011. This ten percent per annum increase will likely Gift Card Amendments-- S.B. 270 S1 Yes continue in FY 2012 and for the foreseeable future. Enactment of this bill Wayne Niederhauser likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for individuals or local governments. Businesses providing gift cards as stipulated in the bill will benefit from the value of unredeemed cards. Enactment of this bill will reduce state revenues by $120,000 in FY 2012 and increase by 10 percent annually each fiscal year for the foreseeable Gift Card Amendments-- S.B. 270 S2 Temporary URL Yes future. Enactment of this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs Wayne Niederhauser and/or benefits for individuals or local governments. Businesses providing gift cards as stipulated in the bill will benefit from the value of unredeemed cards. Concurrent Resolution

SCR 3 S1-- Expressing Support for the Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 10 1 Work of the Utah Council on Yes Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Mar 2009 Financial and Economic individuals, businesses, or local governments. Education--Pat Jones

S.J.R. 10-- Alternative Training Center Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 5 Mar 1 Joint Resolution--Dennis E. Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 2009 Stowell individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Joint Resolution on Fiscal Note Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of S.J.R. 18 Process--Wayne L. Yes this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for Niederhauser individuals, businesses, or local governments.

Senate Resolution

S.R. 6-- Recognizing the Work Done by Enactment of this bill will not require additional appropriations. Enactment of Passed 6 Mar 1 the League of United Latin Yes 17-Feb-09 Randy 17-Feb-09 No fiscal impact this bill likely will not result in direct, measurable costs and/or benefits for 2009 American Citizens" by Luz individuals, businesses, or local governments. Robles

Know people who would like this service? To subscribe or unsubscribe visit: https://lists.uen.org/mailman/listinfo/usoe_daily_fiscal_note_summary

Source: State Office of Education; State Legislature; Governor's Office Compiled by: Larry Newton, USOE School Finance and Statistics 21 of 21 I:\DATA\09 Bill Logs\09 House and Senate Bill Log.xlsx