Arxiv:1606.08602V5 [Physics.Acc-Ph] 20 Nov 2016 Ing of a Soft Photon with Energy Ω0 on an Ultra-Relativistic 2 Electron with Energy Ε0 = Γmc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Radiation Damping by Thomson Scattering Nickolai Muchnoi∗ Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences and Novosibirsk State University Synchrotron radiation of relativistic electrons in storage rings naturally leads to the damping of betatron oscillations. Damping time and transverse beam emittance can be reduced by wigglers or undulators while the beam parameters are still well defined by the common radiation integrals, based on the properties of synchrotron radiation. However the quantum excitation of betatron oscillations in principle can be considerably reduced if radiation occurs due to the Thomson scattering in the periodic electromagnetic field. After a brief introduction we compare radiation properties for different cases and suggest the corresponding modification of the radiation integrals. I. INTRODUCTION Radiation of relativistic electrons from the point of view of quantum electrodynamics occurs due to their θ scattering on the real or virtual photons. After intro- ε ducing the basic properties of the Compton effect we come to the equivalence of the Thomson scattering and photon ω = hν electron ε = γmc2 0 0 the radiation of electrons in a weak harmonic undulator. 0 The scattering probability is defined as a product of the Thomson cross section and the density of photons along the electron propagation trajectory. Consequently the θ changes in average energy, energy spread and the trans- ω verse emittance of the electron beam are evaluated as the product of the number of scattering acts and the aver- age change of the corresponding parameter in a single scattering. Within this approach we derive the radiation damping effect from undulator radiation and compare the FIG. 1. Inverse Compton scattering: the thickness of the results with those obtained by the application common arrows qualitatively represents the energies of the particles. radiation integrals [1] for the case of a wiggler/undulator. This comparison shows that the common radiation inte- grals only include the dispersion mechanism for excita- For our case, after Lorentz transformations we have: tion of betatron and synchrotron oscillations. At present dσ r2 u2 uhu i the radiation damping by wigglers is a well established = e 2+ +8 − 1 sin2' ; (1) technique [2, 3] but also there were several suggestions du d' κ(1 + u)2 1 + u κ κ to use a laser backscattering for the same purpose [4{ 2 6]. The aim of the present study is to find the universal where κ = 4γ!0=mc is twice the ratio between the pho- description of the harmonic damping devices for an ar- ton and electron energies in the electron rest frame and bitrary combination of the field strength and the field u 2 [0; κ] is the dimensionless parameter [8]: period (or wavelength). ! θ ! " − " Let us start by consideration of the scattering of u = = " = = 0 : (2) an ultra-relativistic electron in the oncoming plane " θ! "0 − ! " monochromatic electromagnetic wave. In Fig. 1 there is ' is the angle between the plane of polarisation and the an illustration for the process of inverse Compton scatter- scattering plane. θ! and θ" in Fig. 1 are defined as: arXiv:1606.08602v5 [physics.acc-ph] 20 Nov 2016 ing of a soft photon with energy !0 on an ultra-relativistic 2 electron with energy "0 = γmc . The electron transfers 1 rκ urκ θ (u) = − 1; θ (u) = − 1 : (3) a part of its energy ! !0 to the photon so that the ! γ u " γ u energy conservation law looks like "0 ' " + !. We take from [7] the cross section for scattering of lin- The energy of the scattered photon and its maximum early polarised photons on unpolarised electrons at rest, possible value are: summed over the polarisation states of the final photons. u κ !(u) = " ; ! = " : (4) 0 1 + u max 0 1 + κ In the limiting case when κ 1 the approximations ∗ [email protected] !max ' "0κ, du ' d!="0 and u/κ ' !=!max allow to 2 rewrite Eq. (1) as: According to Eq. (11) if PL = 1 [W], the scattering −11 probability W . 1:4 · 10 and it does not depend on dσ 2r2 ! ! = e 1 + 4 − 1 sin2 ' : (5) laser radiation wavelength. The RTS of intense laser d! d' !max !max !max pulse had been proposed in [5] for an electron beam cool- ing in a low-energy storage ring. In [9] this approach was Integration of (5) over ' yields: suggested for cooling of TeV muons. For laser cooling an ! extremely high laser power is required to produce a suffi- dσ 4πr2 ! ! 2 = e 1 − 2 + 2 : (6) ciently strong field in the scattering area. The power of a d! !max !max !max gaussian laser beam is coupled with the on-axis magnetic induction amplitude B0 [T] as: Integration of (6) in the range from 0 to !max gives the 2 πc 2 2 Thomson cross section σT = 8πre =3. Thus the case of PL = σ(z) B0(z) ; (12) scattering with κ 1 may be considered as Relativistic µ0 −7 −2 Thomson Scattering (RTS). Further we will need aver- where µ0 = 4π · 10 [N A ]. aged values of some RTS parameters, which can be easily obtained using the definitions (3), (4) and the cross sec- tion expression (1). The lowest order in the parameter κ B. Undulator yields the following results: 2 Now consider a plane undulator with a period λu h!i = 2γ !0; (7) (¯λu = λu=2π) and on-axis magnetic induction By(z) = 2 28 2 2 7 2 ! = (γ ! ) = h!i ; (8) Bu sin(z=λ¯u). The dimensionless undulator parameter is: 5 0 5 2 eBuλ¯u Bu λ¯u D 2E 6 λc 1 2 K = = ; (13) (θ" cos ') = = θ" ; (9) mc Bc λ¯c 5 λ0 2 −3 2 where Bcλ¯c = mc=e ' 1:7 · 10 [T m] is the product D 2E 4 λc 1 9 2 of the Schwinger field strength Bc = 4:414 · 10 [T] and (θ" sin ') = = θ" ; (10) 5 λ0 3 the Compton wavelength of the electron. The maximum photon energy of the basic harmonic of undulator radia- where λ0 is the wavelength of incident photon and λc is the Compton wavelength of an electron. tion is: 2γ2hc !max = 2 : (14) λu(1 + K =2) II. RELATIVISTIC THOMSON SCATTERING !max decreases with increase of the undulator parameter due to effective decrease of the electron velocity along z- A. Laser Radiation axis caused by increase of the curvature of its trajectory in a strong field. Note that !max(K 1) in (14) and Let us explore a case when an ultra-relativistic electron !max(κ 1) in (4) are the same if λu = λ0=2. So are propagates along the axis of a 100% linearly polarised the RTS photon energy spectrum (6) and the scattered gaussian CW laser beam in the direction, opposite to the photon distribution for a weak undulator radiation (see light propagation. If the electron is on-axis of the laser ref. [10]). The only difference between RTS and weak beam within z 2 [−a : a], the probability of scattering undulator radiation is the difference between head sea is the product of the Thomson cross section σT and the and standing waves. density of the photon target: If we replace B0(z) by By(z) in (12) and use the result a in Eq. (11), we obtain the average number of RTS events Z PLλ0 dz PL arctan(a=ZR) in a long (L λu) undulator: W = σT 2 2 = ; (11) πhc σ(z) PC π=2 1 σ 2πα L −a T 2 2 W = · BuλuL = K ; (15) 2 µ0hc 3 λu where where L is an undulator length and α is the fine structure 1 • PL [W] and λ0 [m] are the laser power and the wave- constant. Factor 2 in Eq. (15) comes from the decrease 2 −1 length of its radiation. PLλ0=hc [m ] is the lon- of equivalent photon density in a standing wave. gitudinal density of laser photons. Equations (7{10) can be used for undulator, bearing in mind the substitutions λ = 2λ and ! = hc=2λ . p 2 0 u 0 u • σ(z) = σ0 1 + (z=ZR) is the transverse RMS laser The average electron energy loss in an undulator is de- beam size with the waist size σ0 at location z = 0. 2 termined as a product of Eq. (15) and h!i from Eq. (7): ZR = 4πσ /λ0 is the Rayleigh length. 0 2 h∆Ei α Bu L • P = c2=2σ ' 0:7124·1011 [W] is the critical laser u = γ ; (16) C ~ T E 3 B λ¯ power when the probability of scattering is close to c c 2 100% (assuming a ZR). where E = γmc andλ ¯c = λc=2π. 3 C. Emittance Excitation A spontaneous emission of the synchrotron radiation photons leads to the excitation of the betatron oscilla- tions, while this process takes place in the orbit regions If an electron beam with the horizontal emittance x 0 passes through an undulator (or laser beam), located with the non-zero dispersion functions, D and D . If a in the dispersion-free section of the beam orbit, beam wiggler is located in the dispersion-free section of the or- emittance is increased by radiation. For a single case bit, it will induce the dispersion of RTS the average increase of x depends on the beam 2 β-function [11]: λ¯w 0 λ¯w Dx(z) = sin(z=λ¯w);Dx(z) = cos(z=λ¯w): (23) ρ0 ρ0 2 β 2 3 λc h∆1iu = θx = β ; (17) The excitation of horizontal emittance is determined by 2 20 λu w −1 radiation integral I5 [m ]: where θ = θ cos ' (θ cos ' was introduced in Eq.