Vitalsigns Community Foundation 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vitalsigns Community Foundation 2015 Staffordshire’s Staffordshire VitalSigns Community Foundation 2015 Vital Signs Theme Page Grade We’ve produced a report What the grades mean Fairness 2 D to show how Staffordshire A - Everything is great Housing 3 C compares to the rest of B - Things are going well the country across Arts & Culture 4 D C - OK but can be improved 6 key themes. Strong Communities 5 B D - Things are not going well The grades indicate Healthy Living 6 C priorities for action. E - Things are going badly Older People 7 C Child Poverty Local Services Average distance to access local services (km) Distance to GPs Distance to Post Office Distance to Local Shops Cannock Chase Tamworth 12% Cannock Chase 13% 2.5 Tamworth 2 East Staffordshire East Staffordshire 12% 1.5 1 Stoke on Trent 0.5 20% Stoke on Trent Lichfield 0 Lichfield 9% Staffordshire Newcastle-under-Lyme Staffordshire Newcastle-under-Lyme Moorlands 12% 7% Moorlands Stafford South Staffordshire 8% 7% Stafford South Staffordshire • Of children living in poverty in Staffordshire, a fifth of Stoke on Trent and Tamworth, as more urban • them are in Stoke on Trent. areas, are far closer to local facilities than the more rural areas of the county. • South Staffordshire and the Staffordshire Moorlands have the lowest numbers, Residents in South Staffordshire and the • Staffordshire Moorlands have to travel with just 7% in each district. twice as far to reach a doctor, post office or the local shops. Fairness & Equality Salaries Life Expectancy • Over the last 12 months, salaries in Cannock Chase, East Staffordshire, Stoke on Trent and People in the county as a whole live longer • Tamworth have all risen above the average than the average person in the country..... for the country and the West Midlands. But there is a three year difference in the life • • Salaries in Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire expectancy of people in East Staffordshire, Moorlands, South Staffordshire and Stafford Newcastle-under-Lyme and Stoke on Trent have all fallen in relative terms. compared to the rest of the county. • There has been no overall change in Lichfield. 2 Staffordshire Community Foundation Affordability Owner Occupied/ Average House Prices for the districts of Staffordshire Rented Homes Area Name House Prices: average (2014) Affordabilty: Score (2013) Cannock Chase £141.223 110.75 East Staffordshire £160,675 104.9 On average more people in Lichfield £222,946 102.53 Staffordshire own their own home than in the rest of Newcastle-under-Lyme £142,638 110.45 England & Wales. South Staffordshire £200,959 101.01 Stafford £182,666 107.93 Staffordshire Moorlands £156,581 111.09 Stoke on Trent £101,772 123.16 Tamworth £149,262 111.25 • The average house price in England & Wales in 2014 was £242,097. Except for Stoke on Trent which has a higher proportion • The figure for the West Midlands region was nearly 14% lower, of rented homes. at £171,530. • The average house price in Staffordshire was £154,140 - £87,957 lower than the average for the UK and £17,389 lower than the West Midlands average. Housing & Homelessness Homelessness/ Rough Sleeping Waiting Lists FACT Area Name Percentage of homes on waiting list • It is estimated Cannock Chase 3.19 there are 33 East Staffordshire 4.39 rough sleepers in Lichfield 3.82 Staffordshire. Newcastle-under-Lyme 3.58 • 15 of them are in South Staffordshire 1.22 Stoke on Trent Stafford 2.6 Staffordshire Moorlands 3.47 Stoke on Trent 1.27 Tamworth 5.46 Staffordshire 2.89 West Midlands 5.91 England 6.2 This table shows that all 9 districts within Staffordshire are below the National average for the proportion of households on Local Authority Waiting lists. Stoke on Trent is best in the district with the lowest amount of households on waiting lists. 3 Staffordshire Community Foundation Local Amenities Arts Engagement Amenities Rank within District Arts Engagment (%) District score (2013) Staffordshire Stafford 50.8 Stoke on Trernt 447.79 1 Lichfield 48.8 Tamworth 313.71 2 East Staffordshire 47.2 Cannock Chase 165.43 3 South Staffordshire 43.5 Newcastle-under-Lyme 87.41 4 Staffordshire Moorlands 42.8 Lichfield 76.49 5 Newcastle-under-Lyme 39.4 East Staffordshire 73.04 6 Tamworth 37 Staffordshire Moorlands 64.93 7 Cannock Chase 34.5 South Staffordshire 51.98 8 Stoke on Trent 31.3 Stafford 47.76 9 Staffordshire 40.75 West Midlands 41 • The overall Amenities Score is based on the provision England 44.65 of local facilities, including theatres, shops, hotels, cafes, cinemas and other leisure facilities. More than half of people in Stafford borough • engage in the arts, which could include • Stoke on Trent scores higher than any other area theatre, music, dancing or community arts. with a score of 30% more than Tamworth and In Stoke on Trent less than a third take part. • nearly 10 times higher than Stafford which Stafford, Lichfield and East Staffordshire • is the lowest ranking area. all have a higher participation rate than the national average. Arts & Culture Satisfaction with Arts Facilities Local Amenities • More than half the people in Staffordshire are happy with the Although fewer people in Stoke on Trent engage with the • amount of parks and open spaces. arts, the provision is far higher. Stoke on Trent is ranked 64th nationally for the level of provision, meaning it • Nearly 60% of people in Stoke on Trent and Newcastle-under has more facilities than any other area of the county. -Lyme are happy with the number of theatres and cultural amenities, but this number falls by more than a third Stafford has the lowest provision, • for other areas of Staffordshire. coming 334th nationally. • Less than half the people of the county as a whole think there are enough sporting facilities. 4 Staffordshire Community Foundation Wellbeing Electoral Turnout Rank within Parliamentary Constituency % Turnout District National Rank Stafford Stoke-on-Trent North 51.26 1 Staffordshire Moorlands 2 Stoke-on-Trent Central 54.1 2 South Staffordshire 8 Stoke on Trent South 57.43 3 Lichfield 45 Cannock Chase 63.19 4 Cannock Chase 125 Newcastle-under-Lyme 63.58 5 Tamworth 173 Burton 65.08 6 East Staffordshire 188 Tamworth 65.59 7 Stafford 203 Staffordshire Moorlands 67.48 8 Newcastle-under-Lyme 222 South Staffordshire 68.15 9 Stoke on Trent 292 Lichfield 69.33 Stone 69.84 • Wellbeing gives an indication of how happy people are Stafford 70.98 overall, based on a range of factors, including their local environment, their employment and their home life. Stafford as a Whole 63.35 Electoral turnout can be a good indicator of how • • People in the Staffordshire Moorlands have the ‘involved’ people feel in their local communities. greatest sense of wellbeing in Staffordshire, and the second happiest in the country. At the last general election nearly two thirds of • those people eligible to vote in Staffordshire did so. • People in Stoke on Trent are the least happy, coming 292nd out of 320. This ranged from over 70% in Stafford, • to just above half in Stoke on Trent North. Strong Communities Community Volunteering Cohesion • People in Staffordshire are far more likely to engage When asked about community cohesion— whether • in volunteering than elsewhere in the country. people think their neighbourhood is welcoming to others, whether people work well together for the area as a whole • The average for Staffordshire is 9% of people and whether people feel like they ‘belong’ — over 60% volunteering with an organisation at least once a thought that they ‘belonged’ and that their neighbourhood week. This is slightly higher than the country as was welcoming to others, a higher score than the West a whole and nearly 2% higher than the Midlands overall and higher than the national score. West Midlands. However, less than 25% of people thought they were able • to influence decisions that affect their local community, more than 3% lower than the country as a whole. Staffordshire 5 Community Foundation Distance from GP Deaths due to Strokes & Heart Disease IMD: GP PROXIMITY (2010) Mortality Rate: Circulatory Disease (2011-2013) 2.29 2.34 2.21 120 1.84 1.89 100 97.09 1.61 1.54 1.55 85.98 1.35 83.26 82.05 1.25 80 77.19 70.56 77.32 78.21 1.13 66.44 68.23 1.95 64.17 60 56.32 40 20 Lichfield Stafford England Tamworth Staffordshire 0 Stoke on Trent Cannock Chase West Midlands East Staffordshire South Staffordshire Newcastle-under-Lyme Staffordshire Moorlands Lichfield Stafford England Tamworth Staffordshire Stoke on Trent Cannock Chase West Midlands East Staffordshire South Staffordshire Diagnosis Rate (%) Newcastle-under-Lyme Staffordshire Moorlands • Those people living in rural areas have to travel more than twice the distance to reach their closest GP. The mortality rate for diseases linked to circulatory • disease are substantially higher in Stoke on Trent than • People in Stoke on Trent have less than a mile to travel, any other area of the county. They are also far higher whereas people in the Staffordshire Moorlands have than regional and national averages. to travel more than 2 miles. Fewer deaths due to circulatory disease • • As an average, people in Staffordshire have to occur in South Staffordshire, travel further to a GP than the average Stafford and Lichfield. person in the West Midlands, or in England as a whole. Healthy Living Obesity Substance Misuse % 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Lichfield Stafford England Tamworth Staffordshire Stoke on Trent Cannock Chase West Midlands East Staffordshire South Staffordshire Newcastle-under-Lyme Staffordshire Moorlands • Across the West Midlands 21% of people are classed as Across the country the number of young people • obese.
Recommended publications
  • Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment
    Housing and Economic Development Need Assessment Lichfield District Council and Tamworth Borough Council September 2019 Prepared by GL Hearn 65 Gresham St London EC2V 7NQ T +44 (0)20 7851 4900 glhearn.com Housing and Economic Development Need Assessment August 2019 Lichfield District Council and Tamworth Borough Council Contents Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION 4 2 DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC BASELINE 6 3 HOUSING NEED AND POPULATION GROWTH 18 4 EMPLOYMENT FORECASTS 27 5 ECONOMIC GROWTH AND HOUSING NEED 38 6 MARKET SIGNALS 47 7 AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED 55 8 HOUSING MIX 72 9 NEEDS OF SPECIFIC GROUPS 84 10 COMMERICAL MARKET ASSESSMENT 98 11 EMPLOYMENT LAND REQUIREMENTS 115 12 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 132 GL Hearn Page 2 of 138 Housing and Economic Development Need Assessment August 2019 Lichfield District Council and Tamworth Borough Council Quality Standards Control The signatories below verify that this document has been prepared in accordance with our quality control requirements. These procedures do not affect the content and views expressed by the originator. This document must only be treated as a draft unless it is has been signed by the Originators and approved by a Business or Associate Director. DATE ORIGINATORS APPROVED September 2019 David Leyden Paul McColgan Strategic Planner Director Limitations This document has been prepared for the stated objective and should not be used for any other purpose without the prior written authority of GL Hearn; we accept no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than for which it was commissioned. GL Hearn Page 3 of 138 Housing and Economic Development Need Assessment August 2019 Lichfield District Council and Tamworth Borough Council 1 INTRODUCTION The purpose of the Housing and Economic Development Need Assessment Study is to assess future development needs for housing (both market and affordable) and employment across Lichfield and Tamworth.
    [Show full text]
  • Staffordshire Waste Partnership
    Staffordshire Waste Partnership 2013 Refresh of the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy for Staffordshire & Stoke-on-Trent (2007 - 2020) From zero waste to landfill... ...towards a resourceful economy FROM ZERO WASTE TO LANDFILL TOWARDS A RESOURCEFUL ECONOMY Staffordshire Waste Partnership Agreement - 2013 The below councils agree to work collaboratively, as part of Staffordshire Waste Partnership, to deliver the 2013 refresh of the Joint Municipal Waste Management Strategy (2013 - 2020). Signatories on behalf of each council, in agreement with the above statement: Cannock Chase District Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: East Staffordshire Borough Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: Lichfield District Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: Stafford Borough Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: PAGE 2 2013 REFRESH OF THE JOINT MUNICIPAL WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR STAFFORDSHIRE & STOKE-ON-TRENT Staffordshire County Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: Stoke-on-Trent City Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: South Staffordshire District Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: Tamworth Borough Council Chief Executive Signed: Print name: Councillor Signed: Print name: Date: PAGE 3 FROM ZERO WASTE TO LANDFILL TOWARDS A RESOURCEFUL ECONOMY Contents Foreword 6 Executive Summary 7 1. Introduction 8 1.1 Staffordshire Waste Partnership 8 1.2 Vision 10 1.3 Review of the original strategy (2007 document) 10 1.4 Key legislation and economic drivers 11 1.5 Purpose of the refreshed strategy 14 1.6 Structure of the refreshed strategy 14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Acquisition by South Staffordshire Plc of Cambridge Water Plc
    Completed acquisition by South Staffordshire plc of Cambridge Water plc ME/5254/11 The OFT's decision on reference under section 32(b) given on 5 January 2012. Full text of decision published 9 January 2012. Please note that the square brackets indicate figures or text which have been deleted or replaced in ranges at the request of the parties or third parties for reasons of commercial confidentiality. PARTIES 1. South Staffordshire Plc ('South Staffordshire') is a public company limited by shares and incorporated in the United Kingdom. South Staffordshire owns South Staffordshire Water Plc ('South Staffordshire Water') and is the holding company for a number of non-regulated service businesses that operate predominantly in the UK water sector. South Staffordshire is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of investment funds management by Alinda Capital Partners LLC. 2. South Staffordshire Water is a water company whose assets include a network infrastructure (mains infrastructure, water treatment works and pumping stations) for the supply of water in the South Staffordshire area and does not have regulated sewerage businesses. South Staffordshire also has a number of subsidiaries providing non- regulated business activities. The turnover for the year ended 31 March 2011 for both South Staffordshire and South Staffordshire Water was £159.5 million and £87.8 million respectively. 1 3. Cambridge Water plc ('Cambridge Water') was a wholly-owned subsidiary of HSBC Bank Plc ('HSBC')1 (until its acquisition by South Staffordshire Plc on 3 October 2011). 4. Cambridge Water is also a water company that owns a network infrastructure (mains infrastructure, water treatment works and pumping stations) for the supply of water in the Cambridge area and does not have regulated sewerage businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Read an Extract from Lichfield and the Lands of St Chad
    Contents List of illustrations vii General Editor’s preface ix Acknowledgements xi Abbreviations xii Introduction 1 Early medieval communities 2 The communities of the lands of St Chad 9 1 Lichfield and the English Church 11 The episcopal list tradition 12 Theodore’s church 19 Church and kingdom 21 The division of the Mercian see 26 The English Church and the Mercian kingdom 33 The English Church from the late ninth century 40 Conclusions 44 2 The Church of Lichfield 48 The Lastingham narrative 48 Bishop Chad and Bishop Wilfrid 54 The diocesan community 60 The Church of Lichfield and the diocesan community 80 3 The cathedral and the minsters 86 Hunting for minsters 87 Lichfield cathedral 110 Minsters attested by pre-c.1050 hagiography 123 Minsters attested by post-c.1050 hagiography 137 Minsters securely attested by stone sculpture 141 Minsters less securely attested 146 Minsters and communities 150 4 The bishop and the lords of minsters 156 Ecclesiastical tribute 157 Episcopal authority over the lords of minsters 166 Conclusions 175 5 The people 177 Agricultural communities and the historic landscape 177 Domainal communities and the possession of land 186 Brythonic place-names 190 Old English place-names 195 Eccles place-names 203 Agricultural and domainal communities in the diocese of Lichfield 206 6 The parish 216 Churches and parishes 217 Churches, estates and ‘regnal territories’ 225 Regnal territories and the regnal community 240 A parochial transformation 244 Conclusion 253 Bibliography 261 Index 273 Introduction This book explores a hole at the heart of Mercia, the great Midland kingdom of early medieval England.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Drayton Farm AD Plant, Penkridge, Stafford, ST19 5RE 20
    Lower Drayton Farm AD Plant, Penkridge, Stafford, ST19 5RE 20-145/NMP/v2 - Noise Management Plan 25th August 2020 inacoustic | bristol Caswell Park, Caswell Lane, Clapton-in-Gordano, Bristol, BS20 7RT 0117 325 3949 | [email protected] | www.inacoustic.co.uk inacoustic is a trading name of ABRW Associates Ltd, registered in the UK 09382861 Version 1 Comments Noise Management Plan Agent Comments Date 24th August 2020 25th August 2020 Antony Best BSc (Hons) Antony Best BSc (Hons) Authored By MIOA MIOA Checked By Neil Morgan MSc MIOA Neil Morgan MSc MIOA Project 20-145/NMP/v1 20-145/NMP/v2 Number This report has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be used in whole or part and relied upon for any other project without the written authorisation of the author. No responsibility or liability is accepted by the author for the consequences of this document if it is used for a purpose other than that for which it was commissioned. Persons wishing to use or rely upon this report for other purposes must seek written authority to do so from the owner of this report and/or the author and agree to indemnify the author for any loss or damage resulting there from. The author accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any other party than the person by whom it was commissioned. The findings and opinions expressed are relevant to the dates of the site works and should not be relied upon to represent conditions at substantially later dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation
    Submission to the Local Boundary Commission for England Further Electoral Review of Staffordshire Stage 1 Consultation Proposals for a new pattern of divisions Produced by Peter McKenzie, Richard Cressey and Mark Sproston Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 2 Approach to Developing Proposals.........................................................................1 3 Summary of Proposals .............................................................................................2 4 Cannock Chase District Council Area .....................................................................4 5 East Staffordshire Borough Council area ...............................................................9 6 Lichfield District Council Area ...............................................................................14 7 Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Area ....................................................18 8 South Staffordshire District Council Area.............................................................25 9 Stafford Borough Council Area..............................................................................31 10 Staffordshire Moorlands District Council Area.....................................................38 11 Tamworth Borough Council Area...........................................................................41 12 Conclusions.............................................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • ST. PETER JUDGMENT 1) the Rector and Churchwardens Of
    IN THE CONSISTORY CO URT OF THE DIOCESE O F LICHFIELD 3840 WOLVERHAMPTON: ST. P ETER JUDGMENT 1) The rector and churchwardens of St. Peter’s petition for a faculty to remove from the chancel the current electronic Makin organ together with one set of pews and to install a Bevington pipe organ in their place. For the reasons set out below I have concluded that this Petition must be refused. The Church. 2) The Collegiate Church of St. Peter is a Grade 1 listed building. It is a medieval building but underwent restorat ion work from 1852 to 1865. That work was designed by Ewan Christian and the chancel in its current form dates from that time. Pevsner’s description is that “ the long aisleless chancel and the polygonal apse are entirely by Christian in the style of the la te C13” . The chancel is indeed long. It has a high ceiling, a number of tall windows, and unadorned walls. The pews are carved dating from the Nineteenth Century restoration and they and the choir stalls are arranged in collegiate fashion. The chancel is o f the size and has the appearance of a small Oxbridge college chapel. The Makin organ is at the east end of the south side of the chancel and it together with two speakers associated with it and positioned at about the mid -point of the south wall are the o nly readily apparent recent alterations to the chancel. 3) The archway between the chancel and the nave is taken up with the pipework of the large Willis pipe organ which sounds into the nave.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 4: How Should the Overall Pattern of Waste Management Facilities in Staffordshire and Stoke- On-Trent Be Defined?
    Staffordshire & Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy Interim SA of Draft Issues and options Sept 2008 Issue 4 : How should the overall pattern of waste management facilities in Staffordshire and Stoke- on-Trent be defined? Appraisal scoring system Symbol Meaning ++ Significant positive effect on sustainability objective (normally direct) + Minor positive effect on sustainability objective (normally indirect) 0 Neutral effect on sustainability objective - Minor negative effect on sustainability objective (normally indirect) -- Significant negative effect on sustainability objective (normally direct) ? Uncertain effect on sustainability objective N/A Not relevant to sustainability objective 1 Staffordshire & Stoke-on-Trent Joint Waste Core Strategy Interim SA of Draft Issues and options Sept 2008 Issue 5: It is proposed that as a general principle the development of additional waste management facilities primarily occurs within or in close proximity to urban areas, following the hierarchy of urban areas as defined in the draft West Midlands RSS. SA Objectives Score Comments 1. Deliver sustainable development through driving N/A Issue 5 is concerned with the location of additional waste management facilities in Staffordshire waste management up the waste hierarchy and Stoke-on-Trent, as opposed to the type of waste management facility. As such, the location of future waste management facilities is not relevant to driving waste management up the waste hierarchy. 2. Encourage schemes that contribute to self sufficiency ++ The location of additional waste management facilities within or in close proximity to major urban in waste treatment and encourage local communities to areas and settlements will encourage local communities to take more responsibility for the waste take responsibility for the waste that they generate they generate, as urban areas in Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent are where the greatest amount of waste is produced.
    [Show full text]
  • CCG Operational Plan 2019/20 Staffordshire and Stoke-On-Trent Version: V.1 Final
    CCG Operational Plan 2019/20 Staffordshire and Stoke-On-Trent Version: V.1 Final 1 | P a g e Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................4 2. Context .....................................................................................................................................................4 3. Our priorities and deliverables .................................................................................................................6 4. Urgent and Emergency care (UEC) and Enhanced Primary and Community Care (EPCC) .......................8 Integrated Care Teams and Hubs .....................................................................................................................8 Integrated Urgent Care .....................................................................................................................................9 Ambulance services ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Model of same day emergency care (SDEC) .................................................................................................. 11 Care Homes ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Delayed transfers of care (DToC) .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cresswell Farmhouse, and Outbuildings, Barn Lane, Brewood, Stafford, South Staffordshire, ST19
    Cresswell Farmhouse, And Outbuildings, Barn Lane, Brewood, Stafford, South Staffordshire, ST19 9LU Cresswell Farmhouse, And Outbuildings, Barn Lane, Brewood, Stafford, South Staffordshire, ST19 9LU A fine, period country residence providing substantial accommodation and a substantial range of outbuildings which could be used for a variety of different purposes, including annex accommodation or officing, subject to gaining the usual consents. There are level and fenced paddocks adjoining the property of approximately 7.5 acres in total which are available for rent by separate negotiation LOCATION double doors into the CONSERVATORY which has French doors to the garden. Brewood Village Centre - 0.5 miles, Wolverhampton City Centre - 10 miles, Stafford Town Centre - 12 miles, Birmingham - 24 miles, M54 (J2) - 5 miles, M6 (J12) - 3.7 miles (distances approximate). The PRINCIPAL BEDROOM SUITE has a double bedroom with a light and airy triple aspect, a large Cresswell Farmhouse stands in a charming rural position with glorious views across open countryside walk in wardrobe and en-suite shower room. There is a GUEST SUITE with double bedroom and en- and yet is within easy reach of the highly regarded and historic South Staffordshire village of Brewood suite bathroom. The THIRD BEDROOM SUITE has a sitting room and a bedroom. The FOURTH with its full array of facilities and excellent schooling in both sectors. BEDROOM has a sitting room and a bedroom and there is a FIFTH BEDROOM which is a good double room in size. The HOUSE BATHROOM is a large room with a full suite and a large walk in airing and Communications are superb with M54, M6 and M6 Toll motorways facilitating easy travelling to linen cupboard with an array of fitted shelving.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichfield District Local Plan Review Preferred Options
    For Official Use Respondent No: Representation Number: Received: Lichfield District Local Plan Review Preferred Options Please return to Lichfield District Council by 5pm on 24th January 2020, by: Email: [email protected] Post: Spatial Policy and Delivery, Lichfield District Council, District Council House, Frog Lane, Lichfield, WS13 6YZ. This form can also be completed on line using our consultation portal: http://lichfielddc- consult.limehouse.co.uk/portal PLEASE NOTE: This form has two parts: Part A: Personal details. Part B: Your representation(s). Part A: Personal details 1.Personal details1 2 2. Agent’s details (if applicable) Title Mrs First name Anna Last Name Miller Job Title (where relevant) Assistant Director – Growth and Regeneration Organisation (where relevant) Tamworth Borough Council House No./Street Marmion House, Lichfield Street Town Tamworth Post Code B79 7BZ Telephone Number 01827 709709 Email address (where relevant) anna- [email protected] 1 If an agent is being used only the title, name and organisation boxes are necessary but please don’t forget to complete all the Agent’s details. 2 Please note that copies of all comments received will be made available for the public to view, including your address and therefore cannot be treated as confidential. Lichfield District Council will process your personal data in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998. Our Privacy Notice is at the end of this form. Part B: Your representation Where in the document does your comment relate: Part of document Various – please see below General comments: The Council notes that the proposed new local plan is intended to replace the current local plan strategy (2015) and local plan allocations document (2019).
    [Show full text]
  • January 2021
    Biddulph Town Council Wednesday 6 January 2021 Dear Councillor You are summoned to attend a virtual meeting of the Town Council at 6.00 pm on Tuesday 12 January 2021 held via Zoom, at which the following business will be transacted. The Zoom link to participate in the meeting will be sent separately. Any Councillor unable to attend should forward their apologies either to the Chief Officer or the Mayor. Yours sincerely SM Haydon CHIEF OFFICER Members of the public and press are welcome to view the meeting via the ‘Biddulph Town Council’ Facebook page or at www.biddulph.co.uk A G E N D A 1. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION To receive verbal or written representations from: • Councillor Joe Porter- Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, Cabinet Member for Climate Change & Biodiversity • Staffordshire County Council representative(s) • Staffordshire Police The Mayor to confirm that attendees will be named in the Minutes, unless otherwise instructed. 2. APOLOGIES To receive apologies and approve reasons for absence. 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST a) To declare any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests & Dispensations b) To declare any Other Disclosable Interests Biddulph Town Council Town Hall, High Street, Biddulph, Staffordshire Moorlands ST8 6AR Tel: 01782 297845 e: [email protected] www.biddulph.co.uk 4. MINUTES a) To approve the Minutes of the Town Council meeting held on 10 November 2020 (Minutes to be signed when restrictions on social distancing have been relaxed) b) To receive the Minutes of the Recreation and Amenities Committee held on
    [Show full text]