DOCSLIB.ORG

Black and Ottauquechee Rivers Connecticut River & Tributaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Black and Ottauquechee Rivers Connecticut River & Tributaries Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Watershed Management Division Black and Ottauquechee Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River & tributaries Spencer, Blood, Mill, Mill and Lulls Brooks 2018 TACTICAL BASIN PLAN 2018 Black and Ottauquechee Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan Page 1 All Towns Within Basin 10 Andover Mt. Holly Baltimore Plymouth Barnard Pomfret Bridgewater Reading Cavendish Shrewsbury Chester Springfield Hartford Stockbridge* Hartland Weathersfield Killington West Windsor Ludlow Windsor Mendon* Woodstock Black River Ottauquechee River Andover* Barnard Baltimore Bridgewater Cavendish Hartford Chester Hartland Ludlow Killington Mount Holly Mendon* Plymouth Plymouth Reading Pomfret Shrewsbury Reading Springfield Shrewsbury Weathersfield Stockbridge* West Windsor Woodstock Connecticut River & Tributary Brooks Hartford Weathersfield Hartland West Windsor Reading Windsor Springfield * Towns with < 3 sq. mi. in Basin 10 2018 Black and Ottauquechee Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan Page 3 Basin 10 2018 Black and Ottauquechee Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan Page 4 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 9 Summary of Protection Opportunities ......................................................................................... 12 Chapter 1 – Tactical Basin Planning Process & Watershed Description ....................................... 15 Tactical Basin Planning Process .................................................................................................... 15 Plan Implementation .................................................................................................................... 15 Vermont Water Quality Standards and Clean Water Act ............................................................. 17 Regional Conformance .................................................................................................................. 18 Basin Description .......................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 – Water Quality in the Basin ........................................................................................ 21 Overview of Water Resources and Stressors ................................................................................ 21 Summary of Surface Water Assessments ..................................................................................... 23 Condition of Specific Sub-watersheds .......................................................................................... 26 Black River …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………28 Lower Black River – mouth to the North Springfield Reservoir dam ........................................... 28 Lower Black River – sub-watersheds ............................................................................................ 28 Middle Black River – North Springfield dam to Cavendish dam ................................................... 29 Middle Black River –Cavendish dam to Branch Brook .................................................................. 29 Black River Headwaters – Branch Brook to headwaters .............................................................. 31 Ottauquechee River ...................................................................................................................... 32 Lower Ottauquechee River – mouth to Kedron Brook ................................................................. 32 Middle Ottauquechee River – Kedron Brook to Broad Brook ...................................................... 34 Upper Ottauquechee River - Broad Brook to headwaters ........................................................... 37 Connecticut River and tributary streams ...................................................................................... 40 Connecticut River – White River Junction to Springfield .............................................................. 40 Tributaries to the Connecticut River – – (listed from north to south) ......................................... 40 Lakes and Ponds ............................................................................................................................ 41 2018 Black and Ottauquechee Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan Page 5 Wetlands 49 Fisheries Description ..................................................................................................................... 50 Special Values and Features ......................................................................................................... 51 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species and Natural Communities ....................................... 55 Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Needs ...................................................................... 55 Chapter 3 – Addressing Stressors, Impaired Waters and TMDLs ................................................. 59 Major Stressors ............................................................................................................................. 59 Priority Waters .............................................................................................................................. 59 Impaired, Stressed and Altered Waters Watershed Summary of Segments with Impacts ......... 60 Total Maximum Daily Loads .......................................................................................................... 68 TMDL Implementation Update ..................................................................................................... 71 Dams and Dam Removal ............................................................................................................... 72 Known Contaminants & Direct Discharges ................................................................................... 74 Flood Resiliency ............................................................................................................................ 81 Chapter 4 – Management Goals for Protecting Surface Waters .................................................. 87 Reclassification Priorities .............................................................................................................. 91 Outstanding Resource Waters ...................................................................................................... 93 Class I Wetland Designation ......................................................................................................... 94 Existing Uses ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 95 Chapter 5 – Project Implementation: Protection and Remediation Actions ............................... 97 Projects Completed ....................................................................................................................... 97 Table 19. Summary of Implementation Projects ........................................................................ 100 References………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 105 Acronyms & Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 106 Glossary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 109 Appendices .................................................................................................................................. 112 APPENDIX A. – Basin Planning meetings .................................................................................... 113 APPENDIX B. – Fisheries Assessments ........................................................................................ 116 2018 Black and Ottauquechee Rivers and adjacent Connecticut River Tactical Basin Plan Page 6 APPENDIX C. – Existing Uses in Basin 10 Waters ........................................................................ 132 APPENDIX D. – Municipal Planning and Water Resources Review ............................................. 140 APPENDIX E. – Dams in Basin 10 ................................................................................................. 148 APPENDIX F. – USACE / VT ANR / USFWS Agreement & ANR Factsheet .................................... 153 APPENDIX G. – Draft Plan Public Comment Responsiveness Summary ..................................... 160 APPENDIX H. – Potential funding sources .................................................................................. 182 APPENDIX I. – Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Programs Related To Protecting and Restoring Waters ................................................................................................................. 183 Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….184 List of Figures Figure 1. Basin 10 Watersheds Figure 2. Stream Geomorphic Assessments Figure 3. Biomonitoring Sites Figure 4. Lower Black River Figure 5a. Middle Black River Figure 5b. Middle Black River Figure 6. Okemo Biomonitoring Sites Figure 7. Black River Headwater Figure 8. North Branch Black Rivers Figure 9 Sherman Brook Biomonitoring Sites Figure 10. Lower Ottauquechee River Figure 11. Barnard Brook Figure 12. Kedron Brook Figure 13. Middle Ottauquechee River Figure 14. North Branch Ottauquechee River & Conserved Lands Figure 15. Chateauguay-No Town Conservation Project Figure 16. Upper Ottauquechee River Figure 17. Roaring Brook Biomonitoring Sites Figure 18. Hartland-Windsor Direct Figure 19. Mill Brook Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upper Connecticut River Aquatic Habitat Connectivity: White River Watershed
    Upper Connecticut River Aquatic Habitat Connectivity: White River Watershed Upper and Lower Eaton Dams, First Branch White River, Windsor County, Royalton, VT Longitude: -72.514982 Latitude: 43.832124 Left: Upper Eaton Dam before removal (WRP). Right: Lower Eaton Dam before removal looking upsteam (WRP). Left: Upper Eaton Dam after removal (USFWS). Right: Lower Eaton Dam, looking downstream, during removal (USFWS). Site description: Located in Royalton, Vermont the Upper & Lower Eaton Dams are the first two dams on the First Branch of the White River; both dams were inactive and are barriers to aquatic organism passage and sediment continuity; and the landowners support a dam removal project. Problems / history: The dams block natural stream function and aquatic organism passage to 15 miles of upstream habitat. The section of the First Branch was listed as "impaired" for bacteria in 2016 and water quality monitoring indicated that fine sediments deposits behind the dams may be harboring bacteria populations. Removing the dam will restore the natural sediment regime, and will remove the conditions for bacteria to thrive. Objective and Method: The removal of the dams will address an upstream water quality issue, improve flood resiliency, restore sediment transport and restore fish passage to 15 miles of habitat for brook trout, dwarf wedgemussel, sea lamprey, and American eel. Partners and Funding: Funding and support for this project came from the Upper Connecticut River Mitigation and Enhancement Fund (funding), Greater Upper Valley Trout Unlimited (funding), Vermont DEC (funding), White River Partnership (project management), and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (technical assistance, funding-NFPP). Budget: UCRMEF GUVTU VDEC WRP USFWS TOTAL $107,640 $2,920 $61,500 $8,848 $50,000 $230,908 .
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut River Watershed
    34-AC-2 CONNECTICUT RIVER WATERSHED 2003 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS IAN BOWLES, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAURIE BURT, COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Watershed Management’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Winchendon can apply at their local library for loan of any MassDEP/DWM report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • Awisp Program Summary 2016
    ADIRONDACK WATERSHED INSTITUTE YEAR IN REVIEW 1 STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM Graphic by Jake Sporn www.adkwatershed.org ADIRONDACK WATERSHED INSTITUTE TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Program Description and Methods ......................................................................................................................... 13 Summary of Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 Program Discussion and Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 44 Great Lakes Restoration Initiative: Lake Ontario Headwaters Watercraft Inspection Program ................... 44 2016 Adirondack AIS Spread Prevention Program ........................................................................................................ 51 Education and Outreach ............................................................................................................................................. 58 Special Project Reports ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project Interview Transcription June 29, 2012 White River Junction, VT Interviewer: Ka
    HOHP_Schaal_Transcript Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project Interview Transcription June 29, 2012 White River Junction, VT Interviewer: Kaitlin O’Shea Interviewees: Pete Schaal Location: White River Junction, VT Time: 8:30am KO: Kaitlin O’Shea PS: Peter Schaal The Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project, the 2012 segment, is funded by the US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, for the Certified Local Government Program of Vermont’s annual program under the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act. Previously, Hartford’s agricultural oral history has been documented primarily through volunteers, often with interview recordings and transcriptions occurring at separate phases with different people. In 2009, additional historical research was provided through the 2009 Vermont Barn Census. The purpose of this agricultural oral history project is to document the history of local residents who grew up or worked on a farm in the Town of Hartford. The Town is comprised of five villages: White River Junction, Hartford, Wilder, Quechee and West Hartford, in addition to several smaller hamlets. TIME & TRANSCRIPTION TOPICS 00:00:01 00:00:01 Introductions KO: Today is Friday June 29, 2012. I am Kaitlin O’Shea and I am interviewing Pete Schaal for the Hartford Agricultural Oral History Project. Good morning and thank you for having me. PS: Good morning Kaitlin. It’s a pleasure to have you down. Farming, KO: So you said that you were farming in the ‘50s. Can you tell me 1950s. Family where you grew up and a little bit about your family? farm in MA; Guernsey PS: Sure. We started farming at a small scale in a little town called cattle; [Stow in Massachusetts].
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Hartford Draft Town Plan
    TOWN OF HARTFORD DRAFT TOWN PLAN March 11, 2019* Prepared by the Hartford Planning Commission with the assistance from the Hartford Department of Planning and Development Services and the Town Plan Steering Committee * This Plan has been updated since the 2/22/19 Draft. The additions are highlighted in red and underlined, and deletions are highlighted in red with the slash-out feature. In some instances, these reflect relocation and not substantial changes. INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION TO TOWN PLANNING According to the book, “Essentials of Land Use Planning and Regulation” by the Vermont Land Use Education and Training Collaborative, “the municipal plan is the visionary document that assesses the current status of a community and lays out a vision for the future.” Used interchangeably with the term “Town Plan”, it is an in-depth, comprehensive, long range study that provides the framework for future decisions regarding land use, transportation, community facilities and services, utilities, natural resources, historic resources, and housing. It is a guide that establishes a strategy on how to grow while managing the community’s resources and maintaining a high quality of life. The Town Plan provides the basis for public and private investment. It also establishes an implementation program that provides a means of achieving the community vision. HARTFORD’S GEOGRAPHY Hartford, Vermont is located at the confluence of the White and Connecticut Rivers and includes a third river, the Ottauquechee. It is also at the junction of Interstate Highways 89 and 91 and the junction of U.S. Highways 4 and 5 on the eastern side of Vermont about halfway up the state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nayigation of the Connecticut River
    1903.] The Navigation of the Connecticut River. 385 THE NAYIGATION OF THE CONNECTICUT RIVER. BY W. DELOSS LOVE. THE discovery of the Connecticut river has been generally attributed hy histoi'ians to Adriaen Block. If Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 or Estovan Gomez in 1525 sailed by its mouth, we have no record of the fact ; and it is very doubtful whether a river, whose semicircle of sand bars must have proclaimed it such, would have attracted much attention from any navigator seeking a northwest passage. In 1614, Block, having completed his yacht the Onrust [Restless], set sail from Manhattan to explore the bays and rivers to the. eastward. His vessel was well adapted to his purpose, being of sixteen tons burden, forty-four and a half feet long and eleven and a half feefc wide. He was able thus to obtain a more exact knowledge of the coast, as may be seen by the "Figurative Map," which is sup- posed to exhibit the results of his explorations.^ At the mouth of the Connecticut river he found the water quite shallow, but the draught of his yacht enabled him to cross the bar Avithout danger and the white man was soon for the first time folloAving northward the course of New Eng- land's longest river. There were few inhabitants to be seen near the mouth, but at a point which is thought to have been just above the bend near Middletown, he came upon the lodges of. the Sequins, located on both banks of thé river. Still farther up he saw an Indian village "resembling a fort for protection against the attacks of their enemies." This was in latitude 41° 48', and was, > De Laet's " Description of the New Netherlands," x: Y:,met.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Response Summary for Comments Received on the Vermont 2010 Draft Versions of The
    Response summary for comments received on the Vermont 2010 Draft versions of the: 303(d) List of Impaired Waters (Part A) List of Priority Waters (Parts B-G) Attachment A: Part B justification for Big Spruce Brook Attachment B: 1272 Order issued to Stowe Mountain Resort Draft Lists Comment Period A public comment period was established upon the release of the draft 2010 303(d) List of Impaired Waters and the 2010 List of Priority Waters (the Lists) from March 11, 2010 through April 9, 2010. In conjunction with the release of the draft Lists, an informational public meeting was conducted in Waterbury on March 24, 2010 to present the Lists and to answer any questions. At the close of the public comment period, VTDEC had received comments from the following seven parties: Commenter: Submitted by: Identification: City of Rutland Same Rutland Stowe Mountain Resort VHB/Pioneer Stowe Windham Regional Commission, Natural Same WRC Resources Committee Stratton Area Citizen’s Committee Same SACC USEPA Region 1 Same USEPA1 Bromley Mountain Ski Resort VHB/Pioneer Bromley Summit Ventures NE, LLC (Sugarbush Resort) VHB/Pioneer Sugarbush Some comments have been edited or paraphrased for greater clarity and brevity, but every effort was made to preserve the original meaning and context. Comments are grouped according to pertinent sections of the lists. Part A and Interim List Comments 1. Comment: We are concerned that sediment has been removed as a pollutant from the West River below Ball Mt Dam to Townshend Dam -10miles (VT11-10). It appears that the sediment that was released from Ball Mt Lake into the West River below the Ball Mt Dam over 10 years ago has been washed away enough to create an equilibrium in the flow of sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Resource Assessment at Non-Powered Usace Sites
    HYDROPOWER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT AT NON-POWERED USACE SITES Prepared by the Hydropower Analysis Center for USACE Headquarters July 2013 Final Report Hydropower Resource Assessment at Non-Powered USACE Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the largest owner-operator of hydropower plants in the United States, with 75 plants and an installed capability of 21,000 megawatts (MW), or about 24% of the total hydroelectric capacity. This report describes a national hydropower resource assessment study that assessed the potential and economic feasibility of adding hydroelectric power to these non- powered USACE projects over a 50-year period of analysis. Site Selection In selecting non-powered USACE projects with hydropower potential, the study employed a 2012 report by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) that identified the hydropower potential of 54,000 non- powered dams in the United States. Among these dams, 419 were USACE non-powered dams. This number was reduced to 223 sites using the following screening, as shown on the table below. • Generate 1 MW or more of potential hydropower. • No current Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license. • No obvious hindrances in developing hydropower. Distribution of USACE Sites with Potential Hydropower Capability FERC Preliminary or No FERC Permits Total Projects Pending Preliminary Permit Division Identified Total Percentage Total Percent Number of Total Number of Total Great Lakes & Ohio River (LRD) 71 40 56% 31 44% Mississippi Valley (MVD) 50 28 56% 22 44% Southwestern (SWD) 39 7 18% 32 82% North Atlantic (NAD) 21 2 10% 19 90% South Atlantic (SAD) 19 8 42% 11 58% Northwestern (NWD) 12 5 42% 7 58% South Pacific (SPD) 11 2 18% 9 82% USACE Total 223 92 41% 131 59% Data Collection To improve the study data, the daily hydraulic head and flow values for all 223 sites were obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shopper 05-02-18
    56 FREE Years We’ve Acquired the Message Treat your ECRWSS PRSRT STD US Postage Mom for PAID Permit #2 North Haverhill, NH See Page 3B POSTAL CUSTOMER Our Contact Information is on Page 6A Independently Owned & Locally Operated MAY 02, 2018 | WWW.VERMONTJOURNAL.COM VOLUME 56, ISSUE 49 Apple Blossom Cotillion See Pages 8A - 10A KMA Publications Inc. Construction on Woolson acquires The Message of the Block building expected to Week start in the fall REGION – Robert Miller of 1970s. “I feel like The Message BY PATRICK ADRIAN include the Springfield Housing Au- “This is a complicated project,” KMA Publications Inc., owner and is home again, back to where it The Shopper thority, Springfield Regional Devel- Morelock told the Select Board. publisher of The Vermont Journal VermontTHE started,” he said. Miller recalled opment Corporation, Springfield on “We’ve been lucky to get partners and The Shopper, announced Fri- feeling the same way when he SPRINGFIELD, Vt. – The Wool- the Move, and several social services in this particular project. If it wasn’t day, April 27, 2018 that he has pur- purchased The Shopper back in son Block building renovation organizations. for [them] we wouldn’t be doing this chased The Message of the Week. 2009, acquiring another paper has come with hurdles, including The amendment, which the Se- project. Nobody would be doing this The sale will merge the newspa- Journal his parents had started years al- revenue shortfalls and added con- lect Board unanimously approved, project.” pers but continue to be published most 57 years ago. “I grew up in struction costs, but despite chal- changes the original loan terms from Needed architectural revisions only under The Vermont Journal & the newspaper business work- lenges developers say they expect repayment over 20 years with a one have resulted in $200,000 additional and The Shopper banners.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Vermont Water Bodies Known with an Aquatic Invasive Species
    Key: List of Vermont water bodies known AL - alewife SS - starry stonewort BN - brittle naiad SWF - spiny water flea with an aquatic invasive species CLP - curly-leaf pondweed VLM - variable-leaved watermilfoil EF - European frogbit WC - water chestnut Updated Apr. 2016 EWM - Eurasian watermilfoil ZM - zebra mussel These species are considered the most problematic in Vermont Water body Town AL BN CLP EF EWM SWF SS VLM WC ZM Arrowhead Mountain Lake Milton X Austin Pond Hubbardton X Beaver Wetland Mendon X Beaver Pond Proctor X Beebe Pond Hubbardton X X Berlin Pond Berlin X Big Marsh Slough Highgate X X X X Black Pond Hubbardton X X Black River Springfield X Blissville Wetland Pond Blissville X Broad Brook Vernon X Brookside Pond Orwell X X Brownington Pond Brownington X Bullis Pond Franklin X X Burr Pond Sudbury X X Cabot Clark Marsh Highgate X Castleton River Castleton X Cedar Lake Monkton X Chipman Pond Tinmouth X Clay Brook Warren X Clyde Pond Derby X Coggman Creek X Coggman Pond West Haven X X X Connecticut River, Herricks Cove Rockingham X Connecticut River, Hoyts Landing Springfield X X Connecticut River, TransCanada launch Concord X Connecticut River, Wilder Dam Hartford X Cranberry Pool Highgate X X X Crystal Lake Barton X Daniels Pond Glover X Dead Creek Ferrisburgh X Dead Creek Highgate X X Deweys Mill Pond Hartford X Echo Lake Hubbardton X Fairfield Pond Fairfield X X Fairfield Swamp Pond Swanton X Fern Lake Leicester X X Forest Lake Calais X Frog Pond Orwell X Gale Meadows Pond Londonderry X Glen Lake Castleton X X 1 Water
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Ludlow & Village of Ludlow, Vermont: Local Hazard Mitigation
    Town of Ludlow & Village of Ludlow, Vermont: Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Adopted by the Town: _________ Adopted by the Village: _________ Prepared by the Town of Ludlow and Village of Ludlow and Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission 2018-2023 DRAFT of September 24, 2018 1 Town of Ludlow & Village of Ludlow 2018-2023 Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Town of Ludlow & Village of Ludlow 2018-2023 All Hazard Mitigation Plan September 24, 2018 _____________________________________________________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION Town of Ludlow, VT Selectboard A Resolution Adopting the Town of Ludlow 2018-2023 All Hazard Mitigation Plan WHEREAS, the Town of Ludlow has worked with the Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission to prepare an updated hazard mitigation plan for the town, to identify natural hazards, analyze past and potential future damages due to natural and man-made caused disasters, and identify strategies for mitigating future damages; and WHEREAS, duly-noticed public meetings were held by the Ludlow Selectboard on _____ to present and receive public comment on the draft Plan; and WHEREAS, the updated 2018-2023 Ludlow Local Hazard Mitigation Plan was submitted to the Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency for review on ________________________; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Ludlow Selectboard hereby adopts the 2018-2023 Ludlow Local Hazard Mitigation Plan for municipal use and implementation. Duly adopted
    [Show full text]