UK Companies and the Global Environmental Challenge

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UK Companies and the Global Environmental Challenge 01 Leadership now: UK companies and the global environmental challenge CDP 2014 UK Corporate Environmental Report 02 03 Contents CEO foreword 4 Investor foreword 5 Executive summary 6 2014 UK climate change CPLI and CDLI 8 Key themes and highlights of 2014 responses 12 Appendix I: Investor members 25 Appendix II: Responding companies 26 Appendix III: Responding FTSE SmallCap climate change companies 29 Appendix IV: Non-responding climate change companies 30 Appendix V: Building on climate change leadership: Natural capital 31 Appendix VII: References 32 Appendix VI: Mind the Science, Mind the Gap 33 Important Notice The contents of this report may be used by anyone providing acknowledgement is given to CDP. This does not represent a licence to repackage or resell any of the data reported to CDP or the contributing authors and presented in this report. If you intend to repackage or resell any of the contents of this report, you need to obtain express permission from CDP before doing so. CDP has prepared the data and analysis in this report based on responses to the 2014 climate change, forests and water information requests. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given by CDP or any of its contributors as to the accuracy or completeness of the information and opinions contained in this report. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, CDP and its contributors do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this report or for any decision based on it. All information and views expressed herein by CDP and its contributors are based on their judgment at the time of this report and are subject to change without notice due to economic, political, industry and firm-specific factors. Guest commentaries where included in this report reflect the views of their respective authors; their inclusion is not an endorsement of them. CDP and its contributors, their affiliated member firms or companies, or their respective shareholders, members, partners, principals, directors, officers and/or employees, may have a position in the securities of the companies discussed herein. The securities of the companies mentioned in this document may not be eligible for sale in some states or countries, nor suitable for all types of investors; their value and the income they produce may fluctuate and/or be adversely affected by exchange rates. ‘CDP’ refers to CDP Worldwide, a United Kingdom company limited by guarantee, registered as a United Kingdom charity number 1122330. © 2014 CDP Worldwide. All rights reserved. 04 05 CEO foreword Investor foreword One irrefutable fact is fi ltering There is wind in the sails of the through to companies and stranded assets argument. investors: the bottom line is at risk from environmental crisis. The global economy has bounced back from crisis and a cautious The anti-climax that was the Conference of the Parties interconnectedness is recognised in the format of optimism is beginning to pervade the markets. As we embrace recovery in Copenhagen in 2009 marked the beginning of a the CDP UK corporate environmental report 2014, period when the energy and will for action on climate which for the fi rst time includes company responses we must remember that greenhouse gas emissions continue to rise change was debilitated by understandable short- on water and forests, respectively. I’m pleased that and we face steep financial risk if we do not mitigate them. term worries over the global recession. Now that the 71% of the FTSE 350 has responded to CDP’s climate recession appears to be receding, we are getting back change information request and that more companies The unprecedented environmental challenges that we There is growing momentum on the policy front with a sense of opportunity, and a will – judging by President are looking at water and products associated with confront today—reducing greenhouse gas emissions, President Obama’s announcement of new federal rules Obama’s rear-guard action on regulating emissions in deforestation in their supply chain. Even so, the safeguarding water resources and preventing the to limit greenhouse gases in the US. In the EU, some the US and China’s planned action on pollution and standard of reporting and of planning is highly variable, destruction of forests—are also economic problems. 6,000 companies will be required to disclose on specifi c energy security – to have another go. even amid sectors most commonly associated with these risks. One irrefutable fact is fi ltering through to companies environmental, social and governance criteria as part There is wind in the sails of the stranded assets and investors: the bottom line is at risk from of their mainstream reporting to investors. In China argument, with even well-known City columnists for the At Royal London Asset Management, we are also environmental crisis. over 20,000 companies will be required to report their Financial Times and The Telegraph lending support. As trying to come to terms with what these issues mean greenhouse gas emissions to the government. The impact of climate events on economies around the Martin Wolf put it, the risk to investors “cannot be zero.” for our investments. Some of the long-dated debt we world has increasingly been splashed across headlines There is a palpable sea change in approach by Some hope a catalyst will be the Conference of the own is fi nancing climate-sensitive assets out to the in the last year, with the worst winter in 30 years companies driven by a growing recognition that Parties in Paris in 2015 (COP21), billed as the successor 2060s, for example. CDP has done the world a service suffered by the USA costing billions of dollars. Australia there is a cost associated with the carbon they emit. to Copenhagen – only hopefully better organised and by providing pressure and some consistency in how has experienced its hottest two years on record and Measurement, transparency and accountability with meaningful, binding targets. companies and cities report their risks, opportunities and actions on climate, water and forests. Still, I have the UK has had its wettest winter for hundreds of years drives positive change in the world of business Free market thinking argues that the tortured the sense that markets still don’t know what to do with costing the insurance industry over a billion pounds. and investment. Our experience working with over negotiations are a sideshow, but nil desperandum: this information, if they even know it’s there. We can Over three quarters of companies reporting to CDP this 4,500 companies shows the multitude of benefi ts for technology disruption may achieve what global but hope that, as momentum returns to the debate, year have disclosed a physical risk from climate change. companies that report their environmental impacts, regulation never could. Some sell-side commentators a strong price for carbon emerges and action on Investing in climate change–related resilience planning unveiling risks and previously unseen opportunities. are beginning to say the unsayable: that the dominance water and forests accelerates, these reports provide has become crucial for all corporations. and longevity of the oil economy are not assured. We are standing at a juncture in history. With the a rich seam of insight for those seeking to identify the They say the penetration of low-cost solar, likely Investor engagement on these issues is increasing. prospect of a global climate deal coming from the companies that will still be around in the 2050s having improvements in battery storage and electric vehicles In the US a record number of shareholder resolutions in United Nations process, governments, cities, the private adapted to a defi ning phenomenon of our time. the 2014 proxy season led 20 international corporations sector and civil society have a great opportunity to take are threatening to undermine the economic case for to commit to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or bold actions and build momentum in the run up to the dragging expensive and often risky marginal barrels sustainably source palm oil. Paris 2015 meeting. The decisions we make today can of oil and gas from the earth. Coal is taking a bruising lead us to a profi table and secure future. A future that at least in part thanks to regulation and the US shale As mainstream investors begin to recognize the real we can all be proud of. gas revolution, which is of course not without its own value at risk, we are seeing more action from some issues. of the 767 investors who request disclosure through Robert Talbut CDP’s climate change programme. The Norwegian And there is greater recognition of the energy-water- Chief Investment Offi cer pension fund, Norges Bank, with assets worth resources nexus. More desalination requires more Royal London Asset Management over US$800 billion, expects companies to show energy and emissions. Increasing yields in some crops strategies for climate change risk mitigation and water Paul Simpson through irrigation or expansion of agricultural areas management, and have divested from both timber and Chief Executive Offi cer, CDP may not be an option because of supply shortages, palm oil companies that did not meet their standards. the impact of deforestation, confl icts and so on. This 06 07 Executive summary The planet faces ever-growing pressure from the To help drive consensus and action toward an budgets; the Timber Procurement Policy11 to ensure demands of a rapidly increasing human population and agreement at COP21, CDP has launched CDP Road to the legality and sustainability of sourcing, as well as its myriad, often unpredictable impacts on every aspect Paris 2015, which invites businesses to commit to a set the Government’s commitment to sustainable palm oil of the natural environment.
Recommended publications
  • OSB Representative Participant List by Industry
    OSB Representative Participant List by Industry Aerospace • KAWASAKI • VOLVO • CATERPILLAR • ADVANCED COATING • KEDDEG COMPANY • XI'AN AIRCRAFT INDUSTRY • CHINA FAW GROUP TECHNOLOGIES GROUP • KOREAN AIRLINES • CHINA INTERNATIONAL Agriculture • AIRBUS MARINE CONTAINERS • L3 COMMUNICATIONS • AIRCELLE • AGRICOLA FORNACE • CHRYSLER • LOCKHEED MARTIN • ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS • CARGILL • COMMERCIAL VEHICLE • M7 AEROSPACE GROUP • AVICHINA • E. RITTER & COMPANY • • MESSIER-BUGATTI- CONTINENTAL AIRLINES • BAE SYSTEMS • EXOPLAST DOWTY • CONTINENTAL • BE AEROSPACE • MITSUBISHI HEAVY • JOHN DEERE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES • • BELL HELICOPTER • MAUI PINEAPPLE CONTINENTAL • NASA COMPANY AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS • BOMBARDIER • • NGC INTEGRATED • USDA COOPER-STANDARD • CAE SYSTEMS AUTOMOTIVE Automotive • • CORNING • CESSNA AIRCRAFT NORTHROP GRUMMAN • AGCO • COMPANY • PRECISION CASTPARTS COSMA INDUSTRIAL DO • COBHAM CORP. • ALLIED SPECIALTY BRASIL • VEHICLES • CRP INDUSTRIES • COMAC RAYTHEON • AMSTED INDUSTRIES • • CUMMINS • DANAHER RAYTHEON E-SYSTEMS • ANHUI JIANGHUAI • • DAF TRUCKS • DASSAULT AVIATION RAYTHEON MISSLE AUTOMOBILE SYSTEMS COMPANY • • ARVINMERITOR DAIHATSU MOTOR • EATON • RAYTHEON NCS • • ASHOK LEYLAND DAIMLER • EMBRAER • RAYTHEON RMS • • ATC LOGISTICS & DALPHI METAL ESPANA • EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC • ROLLS-ROYCE DEFENCE AND SPACE ELECTRONICS • DANA HOLDING COMPANY • ROTORCRAFT • AUDI CORPORATION • FINMECCANICA ENTERPRISES • • AUTOZONE DANA INDÚSTRIAS • SAAB • FLIR SYSTEMS • • BAE SYSTEMS DELPHI • SMITH'S DETECTION • FUJI • • BECK/ARNLEY DENSO CORPORATION
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update
    COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update 2020 AGM mid-season review FROM EQUINITI 01 Looking back and planning ahead It is incredible to note that it has been over 12 weeks since the official announcement on 23 March of the UK Government’s Stay at Home Measures, and nearly seven months since the severity of the pandemic became apparent in China. Over the said period, PLC boards, company secretaries and investor relations officers have kept their corporate calendars going thanks to rapid adoption of modified regulatory guidelines and inventive modes of engagement with investors. With annual general meetings being an obvious highlight in the corporate calendar, we take stock of the progress made so far over the 2020 AGM season, as well as using what we learned to plan ahead. Now that we are over the first ‘hump’ with the busy period of May AGMs out of the way, we are readying for the second ‘peak’ of June and July AGMs, and then an ‘easing’ until the second ‘mini’ season in the early autumn. As such, in this update, we look at: • 2020 AGM season statistics…so far • Proxy adviser engagement and ISS recommendations review • High-level assumptions for Q3 and Q4 • Relevant updates from the regulators, industry bodies and proxy advisers • Communications in the COVID-19 world – special commentary by leading financial PR firm,Camarco • How has COVID-19 impacted activism – special commentary by international law firm,White & Case 02 2020 AGM Season Statistics…so far Scope of data To assess progress and forecast what is to come, we look at the key statistics for the UK AGM season 2020 thus far.
    [Show full text]
  • Xtrackers Etfs
    Xtrackers*/** Société d’investissement à capital variable R.C.S. Luxembourg N° B-119.899 Unaudited Semi-Annual Report For the period from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2018 No subscription can be accepted on the basis of the financial reports. Subscriptions are only valid if they are made on the basis of the latest published prospectus of Xtrackers accompanied by the latest annual report and the most recent semi-annual report, if published thereafter. * Effective 16 February 2018, db x-trackers changed name to Xtrackers. **This includes synthetic ETFs. Xtrackers** Table of contents Page Organisation 4 Information for Hong Kong Residents 6 Statistics 7 Statement of Net Assets as at 30 June 2018 28 Statement of Investments as at 30 June 2018 50 Xtrackers MSCI WORLD SWAP UCITS ETF* 50 Xtrackers MSCI EUROPE UCITS ETF 56 Xtrackers MSCI JAPAN UCITS ETF 68 Xtrackers MSCI USA SWAP UCITS ETF* 75 Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 80 Xtrackers DAX UCITS ETF 82 Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF 83 Xtrackers SWITZERLAND UCITS ETF 85 Xtrackers FTSE 100 INCOME UCITS ETF 86 Xtrackers FTSE 250 UCITS ETF 89 Xtrackers FTSE ALL-SHARE UCITS ETF 96 Xtrackers MSCI EMERGING MARKETS SWAP UCITS ETF* 111 Xtrackers MSCI EM ASIA SWAP UCITS ETF* 115 Xtrackers MSCI EM LATIN AMERICA SWAP UCITS ETF* 117 Xtrackers MSCI EM EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA SWAP UCITS ETF* 118 Xtrackers MSCI TAIWAN UCITS ETF 120 Xtrackers MSCI BRAZIL UCITS ETF 123 Xtrackers NIFTY 50 SWAP UCITS ETF* 125 Xtrackers MSCI KOREA UCITS ETF 127 Xtrackers FTSE CHINA 50 UCITS ETF 130 Xtrackers EURO STOXX QUALITY
    [Show full text]
  • Description Iresscode Exchange Current Margin New Margin 3I
    Description IRESSCode Exchange Current Margin New Margin 3I INFRASTRUCTURE PLC 3IN LSE 20 20 888 HOLDINGS PLC 888 LSE 20 20 ASSOCIATED BRITISH ABF LSE 10 10 ADMIRAL GROUP PLC ADM LSE 10 10 AGGREKO PLC AGK LSE 20 20 ASHTEAD GROUP PLC AHT LSE 10 10 ANTOFAGASTA PLC ANTO LSE 15 10 ASOS PLC ASC LSE 20 20 ASHMORE GROUP PLC ASHM LSE 20 20 ABERFORTH SMALLER COM ASL LSE 20 20 AVEVA GROUP PLC AVV LSE 20 20 AVIVA PLC AV LSE 10 10 ASTRAZENECA PLC AZN LSE 10 10 BABCOCK INTERNATIONAL BAB LSE 20 20 BARR PLC BAG LSE 25 20 BARCLAYS PLC BARC LSE 10 10 BRITISH AMERICAN TOBA BATS LSE 10 10 BAE SYSTEMS PLC BA LSE 10 10 BALFOUR BEATTY PLC BBY LSE 20 20 BARRATT DEVELOPMENTS BDEV LSE 10 10 BARING EMERGING EUROP BEE LSE 50 100 BEAZLEY PLC BEZ LSE 20 20 BH GLOBAL LIMITED BHGG LSE 30 100 BOWLEVEN PLC BLVN LSE 60 50 BANKERS INVESTMENT BNKR LSE 20 20 BUNZL PLC BNZL LSE 10 10 BODYCOTE PLC BOY LSE 20 20 BP PLC BP LSE 10 10 BURBERRY GROUP PLC BRBY LSE 10 10 BLACKROCK WORLD MININ BRWM LSE 20 65 BT GROUP PLC BT-A LSE 10 10 BRITVIC PLC BVIC LSE 20 20 BOVIS HOMES GROUP PLC BVS LSE 20 20 BROWN GROUP PLC BWNG LSE 25 20 BELLWAY PLC BWY LSE 20 20 BIG YELLOW GROUP PLC BYG LSE 20 20 CENTRAL ASIA METALS PLC CAML LSE 40 30 CLOSE BROTHERS GROUP CBG LSE 20 20 CARNIVAL PLC CCL LSE 10 10 CENTAMIN PLC CEY LSE 20 20 CHARIOT OIL & GAS LTD CHAR LSE 100 100 CHEMRING GROUP PLC CHG LSE 25 20 CONYGAR INVESTMENT CIC LSE 50 40 CALEDONIA INVESTMENTS CLDN LSE 25 20 CARILLION PLC CLLN LSE 100 100 COMMUNISIS PLC CMS LSE 50 100 CENTRICA PLC CNA LSE 10 10 CAIRN ENERGY PLC CNE LSE 30 30 COBHAM PLC
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Prospects for Northwest European Refining
    LONG-TERM PROSPECTS FOR NORTHWEST EUROPEAN REFINING ASYMMETRIC CHANGE: A LOOMING GOVERNMENT DILEMMA? ROBBERT VAN DEN BERGH MICHIEL NIVARD MAURITS KREIJKES CIEP PAPER 2016 | 01 CIEP is affiliated to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. CIEP acts as an independent forum for governments, non-governmental organizations, the private sector, media, politicians and all others interested in changes and developments in the energy sector. CIEP organizes lectures, seminars, conferences and roundtable discussions. In addition, CIEP members of staff lecture in a variety of courses and training programmes. CIEP’s research, training and activities focus on two themes: • European energy market developments and policy-making; • Geopolitics of energy policy-making and energy markets CIEP is endorsed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, BP Europe SE- BP Nederland, Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. ('Rabobank'), Delta N.V., ENGIE Energie Nederland N.V., ENGIE E&P Nederland B.V., Eneco Holding N.V., EBN B.V., Essent N.V., Esso Nederland B.V., GasTerra B.V., N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie, Heerema Marine Contractors Nederland B.V., ING Commercial Banking, Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V., N.V. NUON Energy, TenneT TSO B.V., Oranje-Nassau Energie B.V., Havenbedrijf Rotterdam N.V., Shell Nederland B.V., TAQA Energy B.V.,Total E&P Nederland B.V., Koninklijke Vopak N.V. and Wintershall Nederland B.V. CIEP Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Parker Review
    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Contributing Editors Joshua Ford Bonnie and Kevin P Kennedy
    GETTING THROUGH THE DEAL Initial Public Offerings Initial Public Offerings Public Initial Contributing editors Joshua Ford Bonnie and Kevin P Kennedy 2017 Law Business Research 2017 © Law Business Research 2016 Initial Public Offerings 2017 Contributing editors Joshua Ford Bonnie and Kevin P Kennedy Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP Publisher Law The information provided in this publication is Gideon Roberton general and may not apply in a specific situation. [email protected] Business Legal advice should always be sought before taking Research any legal action based on the information provided. Subscriptions This information is not intended to create, nor does Sophie Pallier Published by receipt of it constitute, a lawyer–client relationship. [email protected] Law Business Research Ltd The publishers and authors accept no responsibility 87 Lancaster Road for any acts or omissions contained herein. Although Senior business development managers London, W11 1QQ, UK the information provided is accurate as of July 2016, Alan Lee Tel: +44 20 3708 4199 be advised that this is a developing area. [email protected] Fax: +44 20 7229 6910 Adam Sargent © Law Business Research Ltd 2016 Printed and distributed by [email protected] No photocopying without a CLA licence. Encompass Print Solutions First published 2015 Tel: 0844 2480 112 Dan White Second edition [email protected] ISSN 2059-5484 © Law Business Research 2016 CONTENTS Global overview 5 Japan 51 Joshua Ford
    [Show full text]
  • For Personal Use Only Use Personal for Annual Report | October 31, 2014
    US SEC Filing Announcement for the Vanguard® Exchange Traded Funds 30 December 2014 Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd announces the following: ETF ASX ANNOUNCEMENT CODE Vanguard® All-World ex-US Shares Index ETF VEU US SEC Filing of Form N-CSR The Vanguard Group, Inc. in the US has completed and filed Form N-CSR (certified annual shareholder report) for Registered Investment Companies with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the US as part of the regulatory requirements of the SEC. The completed form is attached and can be viewed online at the SEC website pages at: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/857489/000093247114007221/0000932471-14-007221-index.htm Further details of the SEC requirements for this filing are available at: • sec.gov/about/forms/formn-csr.pdf For personal use only Further Information If you have any queries on Vanguard ETFs, please visit vanguard.com.au/etf © 2014 Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd (ABN 72 072 881 086 / AFS Licence 227263) (Vanguard) is the issuer of the Prospectus on behalf of the US listed ETFs described in the Prospectus. Vanguard has arranged for the interests in the US ETFs to be made available to Australian investors via CHESS Depositary Interests (CDIs) that are quoted on the AQUA market of the ASX. Vanguard is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc. based in the US. All rights reserved. Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd, Level 34, Freshwater Place, 2 Southbank Boulevard, Southbank VIC 3006 vanguard.com.au 1300 655 888 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Glass Ceiling Exist? a Longitudinal Study of Women's
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – May/June 2014 Volume 30, Number 3 Does The Glass Ceiling Exist? A Longitudinal Study Of Women’s Progress On French Corporate Boards Rey Dang, La Rochelle Business School, France Duc Khuong Nguyen, IPAG Business School, France Linh-Chi Vo, EM Normandie, France ABSTRACT In this article, we conduct a longitudinal study of women’s progress on French corporate boards of directors. We particularly focus on the extent to which women directors have circumvented the glass ceiling. Using a sample of SBF 120 companies over a 10-year period from 2000 to 2009, our results provide evidence of a significant increase in the number of women on French corporate boards. However, the corporate glass ceiling hypothesis is consistently rejected whatever the considered measure of female directors; i.e., the number of board seats held by women, the number of firms with a critical mass of female directors, and the number of directorships held by each women director. Keywords: Boards of Directors; Gender; Diversity; Corporate Governance 1. INTRODUCTION ver the period 2000-2009, the average participation rate of women in the labor market increased from 60 to 64 percent across the European Union’s 27 Members States. More specifically, in France, it went up from 60.3 to 64.9 percent.1 However, despite this notable progress, women remain under-represented Oin senior or executive positions (ILO, 2009).2 This lack of female representation on corporate boards of directors, which is commonly referred to as glass ceiling in practice and past academic studies, seems to be a global phenomenon because women on corporate boards (WOCB) represents less than 15% of board members in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and many European countries (Dang & Vo, 2012).3 Morrison et al.
    [Show full text]
  • COVERAGE LIST GEO Group, Inc
    UNITED STATES: REIT/REOC cont’d. UNITED STATES: REIT/REOC cont’d. UNITED STATES: NON-TRADED REITS cont’d. COVERAGE LIST GEO Group, Inc. GEO Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. SBRA KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT, Inc. Getty Realty Corp. GTY Saul Centers, Inc. BFS Landmark Apartment Trust, Inc. Gladstone Commercial Corporation GOOD Select Income REIT SIR Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. Gladstone Land Corporation LAND Senior Housing Properties Trust SNH Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc. WINTER 2015/2016 • DEVELOPED & EMERGING MARKETS Global Healthcare REIT, Inc. GBCS Seritage Growth Properties SRG Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Global Net Lease, Inc. GNL Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp. SBY Moody National REIT I, Inc. Government Properties Income Trust GOV Simon Property Group, Inc. SPG Moody National REIT II, Inc. EUROPE | AFRICA | ASIA-PACIFIC | MIDDLE EAST | SOUTH AMERICA | NORTH AMERICA Gramercy Property Trust Inc. GPT SL Green Realty Corp. SLG MVP REIT, Inc. Gyrodyne, LLC GYRO SoTHERLY Hotels Inc. SOHO NetREIT, Inc. HCP, Inc. HCP Sovran Self Storage, Inc. SSS NorthStar Healthcare Income, Inc. UNITED KINGDOM cont’d. Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated HR Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. SRC O’Donnell Strategic Industrial REIT, Inc. EUROPE Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. HTA St. Joe Company JOE Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT I, Inc. GREECE: Athens Stock Exchange (ATH) AFI Development Plc AFRB Hersha Hospitality Trust HT STAG Industrial, Inc. STAG Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT II, Inc. AUSTRIA: Vienna Stock Exchange (WBO) Babis Vovos International Construction S.A. VOVOS Alpha Pyrenees Trust Limited ALPH Highwoods Properties, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Industrial Users of Energy Biomass
    12 September 2013 Authors Esa Vakkilainen, Katja Kuparinen, Jussi Heinimö Lappeenranta University of Technology www.lut.fi Published in 12th September 2013 Cover pictures by Foster Wheeler, Esa Vakkilainen and Andritz Disclaimer This report was written for IEA Bioenergy Task 40. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IEA or the members of the IEA Bioenergy Implementing agreement. IEA Bioenergy Task 40 has reviewed and approved this report, but is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information or opinions contained therein. 12 September 2013 Terms Bioenergy Bioenergy refers to energy derived from biofuel. Biomass Refers to the biodegradable fraction of products, waste and residues from agriculture (including vegetal and animal substances), forestry and related industries, as well as the biodegradable fraction of industrial and municipal waste. Biofuel (=biomass fuel) Fuel produced directly or indirectly from biomass. The fuel may have undergone mechanical, chemical or biological processing or conversion or it may have had a previous use. Biofuel refers to solid, gaseous and liquid biomass-derived fuels. Energy biomass Refers to biomass that is utilised for energy purposes. Conversion factors Following conversion factors are used in this report: Wood pellets lower heating value 17.0 MJ/kg Ethanol lower heating value 21.2 MJ/l density 0.8 kg/l Biodiesel lower heating value 37.3 MJ/kg density 0.88 kg/l Charcoal lower heating value 22.0 MJ/kg Pyrolysis oil lower heating value 17.0 MJ/kg density 1.2 kg/l 12 September 2013 Executive summary The markets of energy biomass are developing rapidly and becoming more international.
    [Show full text]
  • Ishares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
    iShares FTSE 250 UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) MIDD August Factsheet Unless otherwise stated, Performance, Portfolio Breakdowns and Net Assets information as at: 31-Aug-2021 All other data as at 07-Sep-2021 This document is marketing material. For Investors in Switzerland. Investors should read the Key Capital at risk. All financial investments Investor Information Document and Prospectus prior to investing. involve an element of risk. Therefore, the value of your investment and the income from it will The Fund seeks to track the performance of an index composed of 250 mid cap UK companies that vary and your initial investment amount cannot rank below the FTSE 100 Index be guaranteed. KEY FACTS KEY BENEFITS Asset Class Equity Fund Base Currency GBP Exposure to broadly diversified UK companies 1 Share Class Currency GBP 2 Direct investment into 250 UK companies Fund Launch Date 26-Mar-2004 Share Class Launch Date 26-Mar-2004 3 Single country exposure Benchmark FTSE 250 Index Valor 1828018 Key Risks: Investment risk is concentrated in specific sectors, countries, currencies or companies. ISIN IE00B00FV128 Total Expense Ratio 0.40% This means the Fund is more sensitive to any localised economic, market, political or regulatory Distribution Frequency Quarterly events. The value of equities and equity-related securities can be affected by daily stock market Domicile Ireland movements. Other influential factors include political, economic news, company earnings and Methodology Optimised significant corporate events. Counterparty Risk: The insolvency of any institutions providing Product Structure Physical services such as safekeeping of assets or acting as counterparty to derivatives or other Rebalance Frequency Quarterly instruments, may expose the Fund to financial loss.
    [Show full text]