Highways Poe Prepared by Nigel Millington
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bloor Homes Western APPEAL REF: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410 Land North of Viaduct, Adj Orchard Business Park, Ledbury Proof of Evidence of Nigel Millington BA (Hons) MSc MRTPI MCIHT May 2020 PJA Project Code: 03468 PJA Seven House High Street Longbridge Birmingham B31 2UQ pja.co.uk This page is intentionally blank APPEAL REF: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410 Version Control and Approval Version Date Main Contributor Issued by Approved by A 06 March 2020 Nigel Millington Nigel Millington Nigel Millington B 20 March 2020 Nigel Millington Nigel Millington Nigel Millington C 15 May 2020 Nigel Millington Nigel Millington Nigel Millington D 27 May 2020 Nigel Millington Nigel Millington Nigel Millington Bloor Homes Western Proof of Evidence of Nigel Millington This page is intentionally blank APPEAL REF: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410 Contents Section Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Qualifications and Experience 1 1.2 Background Information 1 1.3 Statement of Matters 2 1.4 Format of the Proof 4 2 Evolution of the Proposals – Policy Requirements relating to Access .......................... 5 2.1 Context 5 2.2 Historic Planning Policies 5 2.3 Herefordshire Core Strategy (2015) 6 2.4 Ledbury Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) 2018-2013 9 2.5 Summary of Policy Requirements relating to Access 10 3 Evolution of the Proposals – Transport Assessment and Travel Plan ......................... 11 3.1 Context 11 3.2 Transport Assessment 11 3.3 Travel Plan 13 4 Consideration of a Second Access .................................................................................. 15 4.1 Context 15 4.2 Environmental Impact Assessment 15 4.3 Viaduct Access 16 4.4 Summary 18 5 Hereford Road (A438) / Bromyard Road (B4214) Junction ......................................... 19 5.1 Principal Issues 19 5.2 Discrepancies in Junction Capacity 19 5.3 Additional Growth 20 5.4 Intervisibility 21 5.5 Implications of a Second Point of Access 22 6 Knapp Lane and Cut Throat Lane ................................................................................... 23 6.1 Principal Issues 23 6.2 Knapp Lane / The Homend 23 6.3 Knapp Lane 24 Bloor Homes Western Proof of Evidence of Nigel Millington 6.4 Cut Throat Lane / A449 25 6.5 Implications of Second Point of Access 26 7 Rhea Lane ........................................................................................................................... 27 7.1 Principal Issues 27 7.2 Policy Context 27 7.3 Alternative Routes 27 8 Provision of a Single Site Access ..................................................................................... 30 8.1 Principal Issues 30 8.2 Quantum of Development 30 8.3 Ledbury Bypass 32 9 Signalised Layout of the Bromyard Road / Hereford Road Junction ........................... 33 9.1 Principal Issues 33 9.2 Operating Capacity 33 9.3 Safety 34 10 Rat-Running Along Local Lanes ....................................................................................... 35 10.1 Principal Issues 35 10.2 Distribution of Development Traffic 35 10.3 Knapp Lane / Cut Throat Lane 35 10.4 Traffic from the North 35 10.5 Closure of Bromyard Road 36 11 Local Residents’ Concerns ............................................................................................... 37 12 Policy Assessment ............................................................................................................. 39 12.1 Relevant Policy Framework 39 12.2 National Planning Policy Framework 39 12.3 Herefordshire Local Plan Core Strategy 39 12.4 Highways Design Guide for New Developments 40 13 Summary and Conclusion ................................................................................................. 41 13.1 Summary 41 13.2 Conclusion 42 APPEAL REF: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410 Appendices Appendix A Plan of the Local Road Network ..................................................................... 43 Appendix B Traffic Data relating to the CA and AONB .................................................... 44 Appendix C Viaduct Access Options .................................................................................... 45 Appendix D Letter from BWB ............................................................................................... 46 Appendix E Technical Note – Junction Intervisibility ........................................................ 47 Appendix F Technical Note – Knapp Lane / Cut Throat Lane .......................................... 48 Bloor Homes Western Proof of Evidence of Nigel Millington Introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 Qualifications and Experience 1.1.1 I am the Joint Managing Director of PJA, a consultancy specialising in the provision of transport planning, engineering and placemaking advice. I hold an Honours Degree in Geography and a Master’s Degree in Transport Planning. I am a Member of the Royal Town Planning Institute and a Member of the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation. I have over 22 years’ experience in the field of transport planning. The evidence which I have prepared and provide for this appeal reference APP/W1850/W/20/3244410 in this proof of evidence is true and I confirm that the opinions expressed are my true and professional opinions. 1.2 Background Information 1.2.1 As noted in the Statement of Common Ground with Herefordshire Council (HC) on Highways and Transport Matters (SoCGHT) [CD 4.2], the planning application to which this appeal relates was originally supported by technical transport and highways information prepared by another firm; BWB Consulting (BWB). Unfortunately, BWB and HC as Local Highway Authority (LHA) were unable to reach agreement on transport and highways matters and the LHA recommended refusal of the application. PJA was therefore instructed by Bloor Homes Western to review all the previous technical information, prepare revised proposals where necessary and resume negotiations with HC. 1.2.2 Following the submission of additional information and a period of additional negotiations, the LHA subsequently offered no objection to the planning application on highways grounds, as noted in the LHA’s consultation response on the application dated 10 May 2019 [CD 9.64] (p. 6, paragraph 2). 1.2.3 Despite receiving support from the LHA, planning permission was refused based on the reasons given in the Decision Notice [CD 13.1], which broadly relate to the following: • Reason for Refusal 1 - Unsatisfactory vehicular access arrangements; • Reason for Refusal 2 - Impact on the Malvern Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) arising from additional traffic generation; and • Reason for Refusal 3 - Impact on the Ledbury Town Centre Conservation Area (CA) arising from additional traffic generation. Bloor Homes Western 1 Proof of Evidence of Nigel Millington APPEAL REF: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410 Introduction 1.2.4 In addition to the reasons for refusal, ‘Informative 1’ referred to in the decision notice provides context for the planning authority’s stated reasons for refusing the application: ‘All of the above reasons for refusal are easily capable of being overcome by the applicant providing a second vehicular means of access off the Leadon Way (A417)/Hereford Road (A438) roundabout.’ [CD 13.1, p. 3, Informative 1] 1.2.5 This reference is helpful as it clarifies the LPA’s position on the proposed development, in that the provision of a second point of access would, in their mind, resolve all the concerns stated in the decision notice. It is therefore necessary as part of my evidence to identify those matters which might be resolved either in part or in whole by the provision of a second point of access, and those matters which would be common to both access scenarios and would therefore not be resolved by the addition of a second access. 1.2.6 Given the LPA’s stated preference for a second vehicular means of access, it is important to note the policy requirements in so far as access to this site is concerned. Policy LB2 of the Herefordshire Local Plan – Core Strategy 2011-2031 provides that policy context and notes the requirement for: ‘provision of satisfactory vehicular access arrangements, the details of which will be determined at the planning application stage’ [CD 1.3, Policy LB2] 1.2.7 There is therefore no explicit policy requirement for an access off the Leadon Way / Hereford Road roundabout, either as a primary or secondary access, and as noted in the Appellant’s Statement of Case [CD 5.1], the LPA’s Statement of Case [CD 5.2] and the SoCGHT [CD 4.2], the proposed vehicular access arrangements are considered to be satisfactory by all parties. 1.2.8 I have provided further information on the policy requirements relating to access and the transport assessment process in Section 2 of my proof. I have also included a plan of local road names referred to throughout my proof, in Appendix A. 1.3 Statement of Matters 1.3.1 The SoCGHT [CD 4.2] shows that there are no matters of disagreement between the LHA and the Appellant on highways and transport matters (para 2.1.4). Furthermore, that same document also confirms that there are no matters of disagreement between the LHA and the Appellant in respect of the Ledbury Town Council (LTC) objection (para 3.1.5). Whilst the LPA withdrew the Reasons for Refusal, LTC was subsequently granted Rule 6 status and has therefore submitted a Statement of Case (SoC) [CD 5.4], which must be addressed in my proof. Proof of Evidence of Nigel Millington 2 Bloor Homes Western APPEAL REF: APP/W1850/W/20/3244410