Febuary-March

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Febuary-March Washington Rail News February/March 2007 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A Not-for-profit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail." The Battle for King County’s Eastside Rail Amtrak reauthorization reintroduced (again!) Line By Alfred Runte Amtrak has been without authorizing All Aboard Washington has never the morning, members of the press ap- legislation for many years. Last year’s been in a tougher fight than its cam- peared and interviewed our gathering, six-year reauthorization passed the Sen- paign to save the Eastside rail line, the including KOMO-4 News, The Seattle ate on a 93-6 vote but House leadership 47-mile BNSF alternate main line be- Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, would not allow the bill to come up for a tween Renton and Snohomish (the and KIRO radio. Saturday night, we vote in that chamber. Woodinville Subdivision). On Friday, were further invited by KIRO talk radio Sens. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) and January to participate on the David Goldstein Trent Lott (R-MS) are trying again, and 19, the Show. expect an authorization to pass Congress Corridor If the facts mattered (which they this year. On Jan. 16, the two senators Advisory don’t), we would be chalking this up as introduced S. 294, The Passenger Rail Committe a victory. The county, BNSF, and the Investment and Improvement Act, at a e of the Corridor Advisory Committee are rely- press conference with Amtrak Pres. Alex Puget ing on heaps of misinformation to con- Kummant at Washington Union Station. Sound fuse the public. The tracks are so old "It's not going to be that difficult this Regional they are only good for scrap (tell that to year," Lautenberg said of passage. Al Runte is interviewed by Council the Spirit of Washington dinner train); it The bill would authorize $3.2 bill. a KOMO TV at the All Aboard year for intercity rail service for the next Washington protest on Jan. met at would cost hundreds of millions to up- six years while requiring efficiency im- 19. Photo by Jim Hamre the Red- grade the tracks (nonsense); it would mond cost billions to effectively restore the provements to continue. For the first time, Regional Library for its final vote, while line (utter nonsense). Meanwhile, the there would be federal money available to partner with state governments to members of All Aboard Washington county is admitting that the trail will cost improve passenger rail service. stood outside the library to protest. $800,000 a mile (asphalt these days is Lautenberg and Lott said that having Other friends of the railroad joined us, not cheap), for that is exactly what they a viable passenger rail option is vital to making for a very respectable showing intend for their “environmentally the nation's economy and environment. of between 15 and 20 folks. friendly” trail – more asphalt. "We cannot depend entirely on airplanes No surprise: The advisory commit- Stay tuned to the Washington Rail and roads," Lautenberg said. tee sided with King County Executive News for regular updates. The line (and In addition to carrots, the bill offers Ron Sims, voting to rip up the tracks dinner train) closes on July 31 if we several sticks, such as expecting Amtrak and build a trail, “The Granddaddy of don’t prevail. We intend to. Meanwhile, to reduce operating costs by 40 percent All Trails,” as Sims prefers to call it. All make sure you contact all your elected over six years. "This is about reform and Aboard Washington was ready with a representatives both state and (See accountability," Lott said. "It's not just a poster by J. Craig Thorpe comparing Eastside Line, page 5) big chunk of money." Sims’s vision and our own. Throughout The bill would authorize $1.7 bill. in debt repayment, $7.8 bill. in new bonding authority and $340 mill. a year for matching grants. The senators said the grants would encourage overall invest- ment in the system as well as states' sharing in the cost of providing services. Kummant said the bill fits his vision of the rail network of the future, which would be a series of state rail networks threaded into national corridors. Sens. Patty Murray (D-Bothell) and Maria Cantwell (D-Edmonds) are not yet Two visions of the future of downtown Bellevue: on the left is King County’s, with a bike cosponsors of S. 294. For more details trail on the Wilburton Trestle (top right) and a jammed up I-405; on the right is All on its provisions go to: Aboard Washington’s, with the Eastside line preserved and enhanced to provide www.narprail.org/cms/index.php/ regional and intercity passenger rail service as an alternate to driving I-405. Art by J. resources/more/s_294/ Craig Thorpe page 2 trips – and found he could use transit for US Senators Lautenberg (D-NJ) and From the desk of most of his transportation needs, leaving Lott (R-MS) have reintroduced a rail the Government his now-repaired car at home. Mike says funding bill, now numbered S. 294, es- Affairs Director travel time is about the same and he can sentially the same as that which passed "....read the paper, nap and am getting the Senate 93-6 last session. House by more exercise walking to the bus stops. leadership did not allow it to be voted on, Lloyd H. Flem My stress level has never been lower." but with the new Congress, it seems Mike also will use Sounder when the "re- likely to fully pass in 2007. verse commute" – Seattle to Tacoma – Passing an authorizing bill like this is Energy, Climate, Transportation begins. "I will never drive to Portland or easier than getting monies appropriated, – Be Like Mike!; US Senate Bill Vancouver BC again. I've taken the Am- particularly when transportation generally 294 – A Decent Little Start trak Cascades train to both cities at least and rail funding specifically is not a top a half dozen tim es this year,” he said. tier priority with most in Congress. The Now virtually "everyone," including Mike also awaits completion of Seattle main job of rail advocates will be to help President Bush, agrees that that the US Link and the South Lake Union streetcar, educate our US Senators and Repre- pattern of energy use has major faults further enabling urban rail transportation. sentatives on the importance of rail and that human-induced climate change Mike is making it work within our ex- investments. is a serious issue. The few remaining isting system, which is still primitive in its Criticisms of S. 294, which are rela- holdouts to those realities are like the to- intercity phase compared with peer na- tively few from those aware of rail issues, bacco execs who deny the health dan- tions in Europe and East Asia. Now, have come from two distinct directions. gers of cigarettes. leaving the car at home (or even not One school opposes the bill essentially Obviously, there is and because Amtrak will remain will be considerable debate Cleaner-running vehicles with better the designated operator of about how to approach intercity passenger trains in energy and climate change mileage are laudable goals, but far from the USA. This school also problems. Again, there is the only ones we should seek in terms of favors major organizational strong agreement that our changes, including ever-growing reliance of our transportation policies and behaviors. separation of Northeast imported petroleum is not in Corridor infrastructure from our national interest. One point of owning one, like some Pearl Neighbor- hood Portland friends, who rent a car on running trains and believes the monetary agreement, from Bush advisors to the Si- loss of the National Network (long- erra Club, is to get better motor fuel mile- those occasions when they want to travel to beach or mountains) will suffice only a distance) trains are excessive for value age from our near-infinitely large fleet of received. private motor vehicles. (Debate is on how portion of the time or, in the absence of public transportation, any of the time. Ex- From the other corner comes opposi- much mileage improvement and how it tion to S. 294 based on the belief that the should be achieved.) What is generally ample: I could get to the Lewis County Historical Museum in downtown Chehalis bill is a clandestine effort to destroy Am- absent from the conversation is a need trak! Obviously both views cannot be for the American populace to achieve ac- (the site of our June AAWA meeting) from Olympia by foot, bus and train, but it correct. cess to places without always driving In my view, the bill offers not just more those private motor vehicles. Too often, would take 2½ hours, 21 minutes of which are on the Amtrak Cascades. I do handouts to a fatally-flawed Amtrak or its we hear "cleaner cars" is the panacea, near-certain demise, but a decent mix of even from the Green community. drive. But like Mike, I would never drive to Portland or downtown Seattle, though needed reforms, including opening the Brutal opinion: While the probably- door to the possibility of the freight rail- unattainable goal of zero-emission vehi- carpooling is grudgingly acceptable. Like Mike, I can work, relax, and enjoy our roads again operating passenger trains, cles would bring about less air pollution as well as some Federal bucks. Amtrak and greenhouse gases, the other forms glorious Northwest landscape on the Cascades, avoiding the linear root canal President Alex Kummant, in joining Lau- of environmental and societal damage tenberg and Lott at the send out of S.
Recommended publications
  • Bridgessupporting Mobility and Connectivity
    supporting mobility and connectivity Bridges through three east King County interchanges NE 8th Street Crossing Wilburton Trestle at SE 8th St BUILD Application DUNS Number: 120806745 Totem Lake Cage Number: 5P3X3 Connector kingcounty.gov/BuildGrant July 2018 BUILD Grant Application Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development Transportation Discretionary Grants Program Project Name Bridges Supporting Mobility and Connectivity Through Three East King County Interchanges Co-Applicants · King County · City of Kirkland Project Partners · City of Bellevue · Regional Advisory Council (Management): Cities of Bellevue, Kirkland, Redmond, Renton, and Woodinville, Puget Sound Energy, Sound Transit, Eastside Greenway Alliance, and King and Snohomish counties Contact Susan Oxholm, Grants Administrator, King County Department of Transportation Information 201 South Jackson Street, Seattle, WA 98104 206-477-3629, [email protected] Project Type Urban Project King County and the City of Kirkland submit this request for $24 million in 2018 BUILD Description funding to support the Bridges Supporting Mobility and Connectivity Through Three East King County Interchanges. This innovative, multi-modal transportation investment would eliminate three critical gaps along the Eastside Rail Corridor (ERC) trail: the Totem Lake Connector; NE 8th Street Crossing; and the Wilburton Trestle at SE 8th St. The ERC trail is a long-planned, regional trail stretching for more than 15 miles on the eastern edge of Lake Washington. When complete, the trail will provide non-motorized access to booming job centers, transit connections, and recreational destinations to rural and urban communities throughout King County. Project Cost $57 million BUILD Funds $24 million Requested Local Match $33 million Total Local Match, 58% Local and 42% BUILD Funds Requested NEPA Status NEPA review for the NE 8th Street Crossing is anticipated in Spring of 2019, and for the Wilburton Trestle at SE 8th St in Fall 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Resume Layne Kleinart Dirty Laundry
    Resume Layne Kleinart Dirty Laundry ZINC contemporary Thursday, May 4 – Saturday, May 27, 2017 EDUCATION 1991 University of Washington, Seattle, BFA Printmaking 1975 University of Hawaii, Oahu, BFA Painting SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2004 Reunion (solo show), AT.31 Gallery, Seattle WA 2003 AT.31 Gallery, Seattle WA 2002 Field of Vision, Atelier 31 Gallery, Kirkland WA 2001 Dreams & Reality, Atelier 31 Gallery, Kirkland WA 2000 Catalyst, Atelier 31 Gallery, Kirkland WA 1999 Pratt Fine Art Center, Featured Artist, Tully's, Seattle WA 1997 Art Center Gallery, Seattle Pacific University, WA Auburn Arts Commission City Hall Gallery, WA 1996 The Painted Table, Seattle WA Highline Community College, Des Moines WA 1995 US BANK, Seattle WA ArtsWest Gallery, Seattle WA 1993 Gilmartin Gallery & University Unitarian, Seattle WA GROUP AND SELECTED EXHIBITIONS 2016 Featured artist, WineFest, Minneapolis MN Featured artist, WIT Winery, Prosser WA 2015 6th St Gallery, Prosser WA 2014 Featured Artist, South Lake Union ARTWALK, Seattle WA 2009 Works on Paper, Seattle Art Museum Gallery, Seattle WA Tieton Invitational Print Art Exhibition, Tieton WA 2008 Seeds of Compassion, Friesen Gallery, Seattle WA Autobiography, Seattle Art Museum Gallery, Seattle WA 2007 Walker Point Art Center, Milwaukee WI Portfolio, Kittredge Gallery, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma WA 2006 Printmaking Currents 2006, Pacific College of NW Art, Portland OR IMPRIMO, Gallery 110, Seattle WA SPA@COCA, Center on Contemporary Art, Seattle WA Paper Politics Traveling Exhibit, 5+5 Gallery, Brooklyn, NY 2005 Print Invitational, catalogue, Shenzhen Art Institute, Chi- na North by Northwest, Kala Art Institute, Berkeley CA Article & photo, Contemporary Impressions Journal Paper Politics, catalogue, Phinney Gallery, Seattle WA 2004 Seattle Print Arts Invitational, Seattle Art Museum Gallery, WA Seattle Children's Theater (two-person exhibit), Seattle Center, WA Featured artist, Style 2000 - 20th Anniversary, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing North Beneath SR 520 and the Lake Washington Ship Canal to an Underground Station on the University of Washington Campus, Near Husky Stadium
    MOTION NO. M2014-91 Contract Amendment to Add Funds for Design Services During Construction Support for the University Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Capital Committee 11/13/2014 Recommendation to Ahmad Fazel, DECM Executive Director the Board Joe Gildner, Executive Project Director – Board 11/20/2014 Final Action University Link PROPOSED ACTION Authorizes the chief executive officer to add contingency to the contract with Northlink Transit Partners, Joint Venture to provide additional design services during construction for the University Link Extension in the amount of $1,548,989, for a new total authorized contract amount not to exceed $64,616,668. KEY FEATURES SUMMARY • Additional contingency is needed for continued design services for unforeseen work support of University Link construction. Specifically, additional work includes: o Vibration and ground borne noise monitoring, testing and reporting as described in the Master Implementation Agreement with the University of Washington (UW) for Sound Transit entry into campus. This includes development and implementation of pre-revenue vibration planning and testing, maintenance plan and testing, and static and dynamic testing; o Ground borne noise monitoring of light rail vehicle operations during pre-revenue service testing at some residential homes above the tunnel alignment; o Extended services between Sound Transit and the contractor or the construction management consultant for testing and commissioning, post-substantial completion, or potential claims; o Further studies to model and analyze additional emergency fire scenarios for joint bus-light rail operations. • The amount requested is forecasted to be sufficient to complete design support during construction (DSDC) work for U-Link.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges and Tunnels in WA State
    rHR~ (11-tl) United States Depar~mentof the Interior Heritage ",';on5ervation and Recreatioll Service National Register of His.toric Plac s Inventory-Nomination Form See Instructions in H,>w to Complete Naiional Register Forms Type all entrles--complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Hi~toric Bridges and Tunnels in Washington Stt_te _ r and-or common l I \ " • 2. location I f street & number see i ndi vi dua 1 i nventorv fonns not for publication city, town vicinity of c ~gresslonal district state code county code < 3. Classification , . i' Category Ownership Status ~resent Use _district _" public __ occupied _ agriculture _museum _ bUildlng(s) _private _ unoccupied _ commercial _park" v if\ -A- structure -..X- both _ work in progress , _ educational _ private residence _site Public Acquisition Accessible _ entertainment _religious / _ob~ect _in process _ yes: restricted f _ government _ scientific ! ~thematic _ being considered _ y~s: unrestricted _ industrial ....L- transportatl~,n .i oroup no _military other: , 1 _4_._O_w_n_e_r_o_f_P_r_o..:p"-e_rt..:y'-- ~_:__----' ~< \ j J;"'--- \ <.\ :ame Muitiple Ownership , 'r i ! street & number , 1 city, town vicinity of .!"' alate 5. Location of Legal Descript_io~n...:..- .:...-..;,.._, courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. State Deoartment of ransoorti on: county ~ourthouses; atreet & number city ha I "I s clty,town state 6. Representation in Existi ,gSurveys t::.It::.le=----'.:H~i.:.s.:.to.:.r=-l~·c~B=-,r-,i",d=Q1e....::.Su~r=-v'-.:e:.Lv --.:h~a::.fth::.II:::I..!p:.:.ro=_'pe=rty:!....:be=e::.n..:d::.et::e::.:rm.::l:::necI=",8:::lag=lb:.:le:.:':.-:=yel _ no date January 1979 - April 1980 I _federal Lstate county 1oca1 depolltoryforaurveyrecorClI State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation III West 21st Avenue.
    [Show full text]
  • South Lake Union Neighborhood Design Guidelines
    South Lake Union Neighborhood Design Guidelines Adopted 2005 | Revised 2018 South Lake Union Design Guidelines Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... i Guidelines at a Glance ....................................................................................................................iii Context and Priority Issues: South Lake Union ................................................................................iv Design Guidelines Context and Site CS1. Natural Systems and Site Features ............................................................................................. 6 CS2. Urban Pattern and Form ............................................................................................................. 8 CS3. Architectural Context and Character ........................................................................................ 14 Public Life PL1. Open Space Connectivity .......................................................................................................... 15 PL2. Walkability ................................................................................................................................ 16 PL3. Street-Level Interaction ............................................................................................................. 17 PL4. Active Transportation ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT RESOLUTION NO. R2008-05 To
    SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT RESOLUTION NO. R2008-05 To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the University Link Segment Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Finance Committee 2/21/08 Discussion/Possible Action to Ahmad Fazel, Link (206) 398-5389 Recommend Board Approval Executive Director Board 2/28/08 Action Roger Hansen, Real (206) 689-3366 Property Manager, Link Light Rail Contract/Agreement Type: Requested Action: Competitive Procurement Execute New Contract/Agreement Sole Source Amend Existing Contract/Agreement Agreement with Other Jurisdiction(s) Budget Amendment Real Estate Property Acquisition PROJECT NAME University Link – University of Washington Station to Pine Street Stub Tunnel PROPOSED ACTION Authorizes the chief executive officer to acquire, dispose, or lease certain real property interests by negotiated purchase, by condemnation (including settlement), by condemnation litigation, or by administrative settlement; and to pay eligible relocation and re-establishment benefits to affected parties as necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of a light rail tunnel between the University of Washington Station and the Pine Street Stub Tunnel. KEY FEATURES of PROPOSED ACTION • Authorizes Sound Transit’s chief executive officer to acquire and dispose of property interests between the University of Washington Station and the Pine Street Stub Tunnel in the City of Seattle which are needed for construction, maintenance and operation of the light rail tunnel. • Authorizes Sound Transit’s chief executive officer to pay relocation and re-establishment benefits to eligible property owners and tenants. • The real properties identified in this requested action are included in Exhibit A. BUDGET IMPACT SUMMARY There is no action outside of the Board-adopted budget; there are no contingency funds required, no subarea impacts, or funding required from other parties other than what is already assumed in the financial plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Transit 2020 Progress Report: Seattle Area
    Expanding your transit choices 2020 Progress Report Seattle area Doubling your destinations within the next 5 years Seattle area residents: During the next five years, Sound Transit is dramatically changing how we all get around the region. From 2021 to 2024, we’ll more than double your Link light rail destinations, opening new service to Northgate, Bellevue, Lynnwood, Federal Way, Redmond and the Hilltop neighborhood in Tacoma. Also by 2024, we’ll launch new Stride bus rapid transit on I-405, SR 518, SR 522 and NE 145th, and open new parking and access improvements at Sounder stations. At the same time, we’re advancing other Link and Sounder projects described in this report, making it easier for you to get to work and home and to Seahawks games, college classes and Tacoma Dome concerts. This progress report is just one way for us to stay in touch. For more information, check out our website, subscribe to updates and get involved with the projects that interest you most. Peter Rogoff, Sound Transit CEO soundtransit.org/2020report More inside: pg. 2-6 Milestones we’re meeting to bring new transit to the Seattle area pg. 7 The system we’re building, including timelines for new service pg. 10-11 Tips for riding Sound Transit and where we can take you pg. 12-13 How we finance construction and operation of the expanded system At Sound Transit we are connecting more people to more places to make life better and create equitable opportunities for all. 1 More transit for the Seattle area Link light rail Shoreline Current service South/145th
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilburton Trestle
    HERITAGE REFLECTOR Fall 2017 Volume XVII Issue 1II Vision To be a destination heritage The Wilburton Trestle museum and research Standing tall over I-405 near facility that enhances the Wilburton and community identity through Woodridge neighborhoods the preservation and of Bellevue, the Wilburton stewardship of the Trestle is an iconic landmark on the Eastside. It was built Eastside’s history. in 1904 by the Northern Pacific Railroad, as part of the eleven mile Hewiit-Lea Mission lumber spur which was To steward Eastside History completed in 1906. by actively collecting, preserving, and interpreting The trestle stands 98-feet tall, and is 984-feet long. The documents and artifacts, Northern Pacific Railroad and by promoting public built the trestle and spur to involvement in, and support the logging activities Above: The Wilburton Trestle in Bellevue, taken July 1972. #L89-6-8 appreciation of, this in Wilburton, and connected When the trestle was built, heritage through the remote forests of the immigrants, coming from Eastside to Seattle. During Wilburton was a company Japan, Sweden, Finland and educational programming the logging era, there was a town with a larger Ireland, to work and live in and community outreach. mill pond underneath the population than Bellevue. the Bellevue area. Today the trestle, created by the The expansion of the railroad Wilburton Trestle stands as a damming of nearby Kelsey encouraged people in the prominent reminder of the In this Creek. Cut timbers would be Seattle area to relocate to the areas logging history. splashed down and then Eastside to work in the Issue hauled out by scows to Lake lumber mill, the coal mines The trestle and rail line Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY FORUM on ENERGIZE EASTSIDE June 3, 2014 Hosted By
    COMMUNITY FORUM ON ENERGIZE EASTSIDE June 3, 2014 Hosted by the City of Bellevue City of Bellevue Community Forum on Energize Eastside June 3, 2014 Input & Feedback Received CITY OF BELLEVUE COMMUNITY FORUM ON ENERGIZE EASTSIDE MINUTES Tuesday Council Chambers June 3, 2014 Bellevue City Hall 7:30 p.m. Bellevue, Washington Introduction: Councilmember Lynne Robinson welcomed the audience and thanked everyone for coming to the community forum. She expressed appreciation on behalf of the Council for all the comments the City has already received. Brad Miyaki, City Manager, gave some background on the Energize Eastside issue and explained that the purpose of tonight’s meeting was to take written and oral comments to take back to Council and to share with PSE. Mike Brennan, Director of Development Services, expressed appreciation for the public input and participation tonight. He explained that reliable power is important, but it is challenging to find ways to bring new infrastructure into the city. He noted that in addition to the written comment cards and oral comments, there is also a link on the City’s website to provide comments. He reiterated that comments will be captured and reported to the City Council on June 16. He introduced key staff: Carol Helland, Land Use Division Director and Bellevue’s SEPA-responsible official; Nicholas Matz, Senior Planner in Planning and Community Development; Mike McCormick Huentelman, City of Bellevue Neighborhood and Community Outreach Manager; David Pyle, Senior Planner in Development Services. Mike McCormick Huentelman, City of Bellevue Neighborhood and Community Outreach Manager, reviewed how the public comment process would be handled.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Lake Union & Ship Canal 34-43.P65
    Seattle’s Aquatic Environments: Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal System Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal System The following write-up relies heavily on the Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal Subarea Chapter by Douglas Houck (with substantial contributions by Deb Lester and Scott Brewer) of the Draft Reconnaissance Assessment – Habitat Factors that Contribute to the Decline of Salmonids by the Greater Lake Washington Technical Committee (2001). Overview Lake Union and the Lake Washington Ship Canal Washington to Puget Sound. are located in the city of Seattle and combine to In 1916, the 8.6 mile long Lake Washington Ship serve as the primary outlet of Lake Washington Canal was completed, which included the construc- into Puget Sound. In 1916, drainage from Lake tion of the Montlake Cut, the Fremont Cut, and Washington into the Black River was blocked and the Chittenden Locks. The new Ship Canal the Ship Canal and Hiram M. Chittenden Locks provided navigable passage for commercial vessels, were constructed to allow navigable passage barges, and recreational boaters between Lake between Puget Sound, Lake Union, and Lake Washington and Puget Sound. Washington and provide better flushing in Lake Washington. In a 1943 report published by the Washington State Pollution Commission, 45 industries were listed The Lake Union/Lake Washington Ship Canal adjoining Lake Union (Tomlinson 1977). Along system is comprised of the Montlake Cut, Portage with the marinas, houseboats, and commercial Bay, Lake Union, the Fremont Cut, and the Salmon Bay Waterway. The Montlake Cut is an approximately 100-foot wide channel with con- crete bulkheads extending along the length of the channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Washington Ship Canal and Lake Washington NOAA Chart 18447
    BookletChart™ Lake Washington Ship Canal and Lake Washington NOAA Chart 18447 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Included Area Published by the Magnolia Bluff and Duwamish Head, has a width of about 2 miles and extends SE for nearly the same distance. The bay is deep throughout National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration most of its area. National Ocean Service A speed limit of 4 knots is enforced within the guide piers of the Hiram Office of Coast Survey M. Chittenden Locks. A speed limit of 7 knots is enforced elsewhere in the Lake Washington Ship Canal, except in an area marked by four www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov private buoys in the N part of Lake Union. 888-990-NOAA The Hiram M. Chittenden Locks, a double lock, and a fixed dam are at the narrows of the entrance to Salmon Bay, 1.2 miles in from the sound. What are Nautical Charts? The large lock, a two-chamber structure, has a clear length of 760 feet, width of 80 feet, lift of 26 feet, and depth over the lower miter sill of 29 Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show feet. The small lock has a clear length of 123 feet, width of 28 feet, lift of water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much 26 feet, and depth over the lower sill of 16 feet. Passage time is less more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and than 30 minutes for large vessels and 5 to 10 minutes for small vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • CSOV 120 Spring 2021 Languages of Our Ancestors
    University of Washington - 2021 Urban Forest Symposium CHESHIAHUD TALKS: Historical Union Bay Forests A Family Generational View on Being Connected & Responsibility Prepared By: Jeffrey Thomas (Muckleshoot Tribal Elder; UW B.S. Zoology, M.Sc. Marine Affairs) Director: Timber, Fish & Wildlife Program/Puyallup Tribe of Indians (253) 405-7478 [email protected] ** Disclaimer – All of the photographic and timeline information assembled herein was collected from currently available digital internet sources - and thus may be inaccurate - depending upon the veracity of the sources. CHIEF DESCENDANTS Pre-1850s: Treaty Maps • 1820 – Lake John Cheshiahud born on southern Union Bay village – this was a vital passage from the coast into the lakes and river system all the way up to Issaquah and beyond. ➢ Duwamish people traveling by canoe had access to waterway connections unavailable to larger Euro-American vessels. ➢ Lake John reported to have “…a cabin on Lake Union across from the University grounds…Lake John used to take pelts to the trading station at Steilacoom before Seattle was thought of.” 1850s: Union Bay Map 1856 & Chief Cheshiahud Village Site • 1851 – Denny Party arrives to begin claiming Duwamish homelands – including Lake Union. • 1853: Washington Territory established. • 1854 – Seattle’s 1st school opens as a private/tuition school (on 1st and Madison) – then moves but continues to operate until 1861…when students were sent to classes in the new building of the Territorial University. The first year of the Territorial University, there were 37 students, of which 36 were below college level. • 1854 – Washington Territorial Legislature outlaws Non- Native men marrying Native women (but legalizes it again in 1868).
    [Show full text]