DOCSLIB.ORG

Bicycle and Trail Improvements in CIP (07/13/16)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bicycle and Trail Improvements in CIP (07/13/16) Updated 07/13/16 FY 2017 – FY 2026 PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) BUDGET WORK SESSION FOLLOW-UP TABLE OF CONTENTS New items are shaded; the distribution date for each item is indicated in ( ). A. Overview B. Capital Funding C. General Government 1. List of active Neighborhood Conservation (NC) projects. (06/22/16) 2. Parks & Recreation – Public-Private partnerships (07/07/16) 3. Fire – Fire Station 8 Call Types (07/07/16) 4. Energy Efficiency – Investments and savings (07/12/16) D. Technology & Equipment E. Metro & Transportation 1. Transportation - Trail Connection from Long Bridge Park to Mount Vernon trail (06/29/16) 2. Transportation – Transitway Extension along Clark/Bell (06/29/16) 3. Transportation – Slides on Streetcar unspent funds and Army Navy Country Club access drive (06/29/16) 4. Transportation – Transit Development Plan (07/07/16) 5. Transportation – Transit service in South Fairlington (07/11/16) 6. Transportation – Show updates/progress on Paving map (07/11/16) 7. Transportation – Transit Development Plan (TDP) and Columbia Pike (07/12/16) 8. Transportation – Bicycle and Trail Improvements in CIP (07/13/16) F. Utilities & Stormwater 1. Utilities – Developer Fees (06/22/16) 2. Stormwater - How does Four Mile Run Tidal Restoration fit into the overall Four Mile Run Restoration Master Plan and provide a brief update on the status and timing of the overall Master Plan. (06/22/16) 3. Stormwater - Environmental Quality – For the N. Patrick Henry Drive/20th Street North Watershed Retrofit project, what is the timing now for installation of the bioretention Facilities and why could this not have been done simultaneously with the completion of the NCAC work as envisioned in the CIP? (06/22/16) 4. Stormwater - Should we seek more legislative authority to address stormwater and tree impacts from single-family homes? (06/22/16) 5. Stormwater - Prepare a briefing on the new stormwater developer regulations to better understand concerns about the new Stormwater Management Ordinance from those regulated (too stringent) and those next door to new development projects (not stringent enough). (06/22/16) 6. Stormwater - Correction to question about STAG grant for Four Mile Run. (06/22/16) L:\DMFBUD\Capital Budget\CIP\CIP 17-26\Worksessions FollowUp\01 Table of Contents for CIP worksession follow-up.docx Subject: DES & DPR – Bike and Trail Investments FY 2017 – FY 2026 Proposed CIP Work Session Follow-up July 13, 2016 The attached information is provided in response to questions from Mr. Fisette and Ms. Cristol on investments in bike elements and trail improvements in the CIP. Attached is a summary of the various bike-related investments included in the CIP, ranging from Transportation to Parks projects. It is a comprehensive list that includes BikeArlington, Capital Bikeshare, complete streets, bridge renovation, improvements to outside corridors, trail connecting to Long Bridge Park and emergency bicycle and pedestrian access at Army Navy County Club, as well as the Trail Modernization program and trails within various County parks. Please note, some trail and bike related costs are not explicitly broken out since they are included in the overall park’s project budget or transportation program budgets such as complete streets budget, bridge renovations, improvements to outside corridor budgets, and other project budgets. These are noted as footnote 2 and highlighted in the pale gold color. E-8 Bike and Trail Investments - FY17-FY26 Proposed CIP Transportation Capital Programs and Projects FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Total BIKE Arlington Bicycle Parking 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 300 Wayfinding Signage 50 30 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 120 Bike/Ped automated counting technology 28 38 52 24 19 10 14 19 25 12 241 Arlington Blvd Enhancements 5 5 5 40 40 500 595 Custis and W&OD Trail Safety Improvements 1,141 1,141 W&OD @ Lee Hwy Crossing 25 155 180 Potomac Yard/Four Mile Run Trail 25 235 500 760New trail Arlington Boulevard Trail improvements 68 287 287 642 Route 110 Trail 65 772 712 1,549 New trail Washington Boulevard Trail - Phase 2 1,885 215 2,100 New trail Trail Spot Improvements 150 150 150 150 150 150 900 Custis Trail Renovation and Expansion 50 5002,000 1,000 3,550 Bluemont Junction Trail Safety Improvements 130 40 170engineering and reconstruction of three street intersections along the Bluemont Trail: N Buchanan Street, N Emerson Street, and N Kensington Street Protected Bike Lanes 40 60 120 85 65 20 120 120 630 Four Mile Run Pedestrian & Cyclist Bridge 2,500 2,500 5,000 New infrastructure Potential Future Bike Projects 200 200 200 600 Subtotal - BIKE Arlington 3,467 1,712 1,736 339 309 745 3,199 4,924 1,530 517 18,478 Capital Bikeshare Expansion Capital 431 444 458 472 - -50 - -1,855 - Maintenance Capital 309 195 236 1791,238 1,792 1,137 1,231 9161,215 8,448 Subtotal - Capital Bikeshare 740 639 694 6511,238 1,792 1,187 1,231 916 1,215 10,303 Columbia Pike Streets Columbia Pike from S. Frederick Street to S. Jefferson Street Includes the construction of a 10 foot shared use bike/ped facility on the north side of Columbia Pike; FY17- (Segments H & I)2 FY19 Columbia Pike from S. Quinn Street to S. Courthouse Road Includes the construction of a 10 foot shared use bike/ped facility on the north side of Columbia Pike; FY17- (Segment C)2 FY19 Columbia Pike from S. Joyce Street to S. Orme Street 2 Includes the construction of a 10 foot shared use bike/ped facility on the north side of Columbia Pike; FY17- FY20 Bike Boulevards 770 770 Bike Boulevard - 9th Street S Extension to Dinwiddie Street 150 675 675 875 2,375 Subtotal - Columbia Pike Streets 920 675 675 875 - - - - - 3,145 - Rosslyn-Ballston Arterial Street Improvements Bike/Ped Underpass at the Intersection of Lee and Lynn 250 1,750 1,500 3,500 New Trail Connection between Iwo Jima and Roosevelt Bridge 2501,250 1,500 Rosslyn Plaza Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge 5003,000 3,500 Elevated Bike/Ped Trail from Lynn to Arlington Ridge Road 750 750 Lynn Street Esplanade and Rosslyn Circle Improvements2 Bike trail improvements; FY17-FY19 Subtotal - Rosslyn-Ballston Arterial Street Improvements - 250 - 1,750 1,500 - - 1,000 1,750 3,000 9,250 Bridge Renovation N. Carlin Springs Road bridge over George Mason Drive2 New bicycle facilities; FY17-FY18 Shirlington Road Bridge Upgrade2 New bicycle facilities; FY17-FY20 N. Meade Street Bridge Rehabilitation2 New bicycle facilities; FY20-FY23 Improvements Outside Major Corridors Walter Reed Dr. - 5th St. to Columbia Pike 2 Bike lanes; FY17-FY18 Walter Reed Dr. - Arlington Mill to Four Mile Run2 New trail; FY17-FY18 Five Points Intersection2 Bike lanes; FY17-FY18 Wilson Blvd. - Improvements West of Glebe Road 2 Potential creation of new bike lanes; FY18-FY21 Boundary Channel Drive Interchange New Trail2 New trail that would be built alongside Long Bridge and Boundary Channel drives that passes underneath I- 395 before separating from the roadway and following the shore of the Pentagon Lagoon to an existing underpass of the George Washington Memorial Parkway; FY17-FY21 E-8 Bike and Trail Investments - FY17-FY26 Proposed CIP Transportation Capital Programs and Projects FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Total Army Navy County Club Emergency Access Drive New roadway connection for emergency & bike/ped access 50 6002,500 2,000 5,150 Army Navy Drive Complete Street Improved bicycle accomodations2 Includes 0.7 mile two-way dedicated bicylcing facility; FY20-FY23 Crystal City, Pentagon City, Potomac Yard Streets Crystal Drive - US 1 to 27th Street South2 Improved bicylce safety; FY17-FY21 South Eads Street Complete Street Project2 New bicycle facilities; FY17-FY26 18th Street South Complete Street Project2 Continue the existing South Hayes Street Protected Bike Lane; FY17-FY20 East Falls Church Streets N. Sycamore Street Improvements2 Separated bicycle facilities; FY17-FY20 Lee Highway Improvements2 Provides bicycle facilities; FY21-FY24 EFC - Traffic Signal Upgrades (Lee Hwy/Washington Blvd. & Improved bike safety & accessibility; FY17 Lee Hwy/Fairfax Dr.)2 Lee Highway Multimodal Improvements Improved bicycle safety2 FY19-FY26 Neighborhood Complete Streets Enhance bicycle infrastructure in residential neighborhoods2 FY17-FY26 Regulatory Signage Provides clear signage to help bicyclists2 FY17-FY26 Safe Routes to Schools Ashlawn School - 8th Rd. N. Connection to Wilson Blvd.2 ADA compliant bike/ped connection from 8th Rd N adjacent to Ashlawn Elementary School to Wilson Blvd; FY17 S. 2nd St. / Old Glebe Rd.2 Accommodate bike lanes on 2nd St.; FY17-FY18 McKinley Rd.2 Bike lanes; FY17-FY21 Ballston Multimodal Improvements Bike improvements2 Additional bike racks; FY17-FY18 Parks and Recreation Capital Programs and Projects FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Total Design for Four Mile Run Trail through Bluemont Park 2 FY18: section from Wilson Boulevard to the edge of eastern side of tennis courts/diamond field #3 Shirlington Trail link from Jennie Dean with potential connection to Four Mile Run Trail 2 FY2018, FY2019, FY2020 Design and construction funding Parks Maintenance Capital Trail Modernization Program 700 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 5,650 replace, mill, re-pave and includes support amenities and trail lighting. Long Bridge Park cotinuation of esplanade through 10.5 acres 2 1) All figures represent spending projections by fiscal year 2) Included in overall budget for this project/program; cost estimate not broken out at this level of detail E-8.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Four Mile Run Valley
    CHAPTER 2 FOUR MILE RUN VALLEY EXISTING CONDITIONS OVERVIEW This chapter contains an overview of existing conditions in the Four Mile Run Valley AREA PLAN STUDY AREA study area. In 2016, the County engaged a team of consultants to review and analyze The Four Mile Run Valley Area Plan study area [See Figure 2.2: 4MRV Planning Area existing conditions and surrounding context, and to help develop ideas and concepts Map] is approximately 95 acres in southern Arlington County bordered by the Nauck for review with the 4MRV Working Group and the broader community. In addition residential neighborhood (north), Four Mile Run stream (south), I-395 (east), and to reviewing existing plans and policy documents that might inform this planning pro- Barcroft Park (west). The study area is divided into four subareas: cess, the consultant team carried out analysis of existing conditions in six topic areas: Urban Form, Transportation, Environment, Economics, Open Space, and Historic Re- Subareas A and B located along S. Four Mile Run Drive include significant community sources. This chapter highlights key conditions, constrains and opportunities from that spaces and recreational resources, including the Four Mile Run Trail, the W&OD Trail, analysis, organized in the following sequence: Allie S. Freed Park, and the immediately adjacent Jennie Dean Park, Shirlington Dog Park, and Barcroft Park. The greatest visibility of Four Mile Run itself is from area • HISTORY bridges; along much of its length, the waterway is faced by the rear of lots/buildings • 4MRV TODAY and dense vegetation. • LAND USE / ZONING • WATER RESOURCES Subareas A and B contain primarily service commercial uses, including many auto- and dog-oriented services.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastbound Widening Revised Environmental Assessment
    STATE PROJECT NUMBER: 0066-96A-417, P101, R201, C501; UPC: 108424 | FEDERAL PROJECT NUMBER: NHPP-066-1(356) FAIRFAX AND ARLINGTON COUNTIES, VIRGINIA TRANSFORM I-66: INSIDE THE BELTWAY Eastbound Widening Revised Environmental Assessment MARCH 2017 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REVISED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Transform Interstate 66: Inside the Capital Beltway, Eastbound Widening Fairfax and Arlington Counties, Virginia State Project Number: 0066-96A-417, P101, R201, C501; UPC: 108424 Federal Project Number: NHPP-066-1(356) From: Exit 67 Dulles Airport Access Road (Route 267) To: Exit 71 Fairfax Drive (Route 237) Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (C) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 HISTORY OF I-66 ................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 NEEDS FOR THE PROJECT ................................................................................................ 1-5 1.4.1 Reduce Congestion and Improve Traffic Operations ......................................................... 1-6 1.4.2 Address Safety
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    20130904 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Highlights from the Final Report ................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Supplemental Report Objectives .................................................................................. 1-6 2.0 Refined Multimodal Package ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Roadway Refinement ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Transit Refinement ......................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Refined Package Model Results ................................................................................... 2-8 2.4 Peak-Only Tolls versus All Day Tolls .......................................................................... 2-20 2.5 Refined Multimodal Package Conclusions ................................................................. 2-22 3.0 Refined Bicycle and Pedestrian Recommendations ......................................................... 3-1 3.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Refinement ................................................................ 3-2 3.2 Regionally Significant Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects ............................................ 3-4 3.3 Additional Considerations for Bicycle
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet-50-€”-Crystal
    Sweet 50 - Sweet Ride 2021 (Crystal City Water Park start) 48.5 miles Leg Dir Type Notes Total ↑ Generic START: Route starts at Crystal City Water Park 0.0 0.0 ↑ Generic Head North on Crystal Drive to start your ride! 0.0 0.3 ↑ Straight Continue onto 12th St S 0.3 0.1 → Right Turn right onto Long Bridge Drive 0.4 0.6 ← Left Turn left onto Boundary Channel Drive 1.0 0.8 → Right Turn right into parking lot 1.8 Turn left and ride through the parking lot towards the 0.0 ← Left 1.8 trail 0.0 → Right Turn right towards the trail over the bridge 1.8 0.5 ← Left Turn left from parking lot towards the trail 2.3 Turn right to take the trail under George Washington 0.0 → Right 2.3 Memorial Parkway bridge Follow the trail up the hill around the Navy-Merchant 0.1 ← Left 2.4 Marine Memorial 1.9 → Right Keep right to stay on Mt Vernon Trail 4.4 0.3 ↑ Straight Continue onto Custis Trail 4.7 0.8 → Right Turn right to stay on Custis Trail 5.5 0.6 ← Left Sharp left to stay on Custis Trail 6.1 0.1 ← Left Turn left to continue on the trail 6.2 0.1 ← Left Slight left onto Lorcom Ln 6.3 0.4 → Right Turn right onto Nelly Custis Dr 6.7 0.4 ↑ Straight Continue onto Military Rd 7.1 0.3 → Right Turn right onto Marcey Rd 7.4 0.1 ← Left Turn left onto N Beechwood Pl 7.5 0.1 ← Left Turn left onto N Beechwood Circle 7.6 0.0 ↑ GenericCaution— steep grade! 7.7 0.1 → Right Turn right onto Military Rd 7.8 Use the crosswalk to make a U-Turn and take the 0.0 ↑ U Turn 7.8 sidewalk to Zachary Taylor Park 0.0 → Right Turn right in to the Zachary Taylor Park pit stop! 7.8 Turn
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item #2 – Attachment 2, Transaction
    V.B Transportation Action Plan for Northern Virginia TransAction Plan Project List Draft for Public Comment Spring/Summer 2017 This project list includes a brief Project List: Index by Corridor Segment description of the 358 candidate Segment Description Page regional projects included in 1-1 Rt. 7/Rt. 9 — West Virginia state line to Town of Leesburg 3 TransAction. The projects are 1-2 Rt. 7/Dulles Greenway — Town of Leesburg to Rt. 28 5 listed by Corridor Segment. 1-3 Rt. 7/Dulles Toll Road/Silver Line — Rt. 28 to Tysons 12 Larger projects are listed under 1-4 Rt. 7/Dulles Toll Road/Silver Line — Tysons to US 1 18 each Corridor Segment in which 2-1 Loudoun County Parkway/Belmont Ridge Road — Rt. 7 to US 50 36 they are located, and may 2-2 Bi-County Parkway — US 50 to I-66 42 appear multiple times in this 2-3 Rt. 234 — I-66 to I-95 45 project list. 3-1 Rt. 28 — Rt. 7 to I-66 51 3-2 Rt. 28 — I-66 to Fauquier County Line 56 4-1 Prince William Parkway — I-66 to I-95 60 5-1 Fairfax County Parkway — Rt. 7 to US 50 66 5-2 Fairfax County Parkway — US 50 to Rolling Road 70 5-3 Fairfax County Parkway — Rolling Road to US 1 74 6-1 I-66/US 29/VRE Manassas — Prince William County Line to Rt. 28 78 6-2 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange Silver Line — Rt. 28 to I-495 84 6-3 I-66/US 29/US 50/Orange Silver Line — I-495 to Potomac River 90 7-1 I-495 — American Legion Bridge to I-66 100 7-2 I-495 — I-66 to I-395 105 7-3 I-495 — I-95 to Woodrow Wilson Bridge 110 I-95/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg — Stafford County Line to Fairfax County 8-1 121 Line 8-2 I-95/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg — Prince William County Line to I-495 127 I-395/US 1/VRE Fredericksburg/Blue Yellow Line — I-495 to Potomac 8-3 137 River 9-1 US 15 — Potomac River to Rt.
    [Show full text]
  • Bluemont Resident Since 1961 and Former Association President, Who Has Made Our Neighborhood a Better Place
    ARLINGTON COUNTY VIRGINIA AUGUST 1999 NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION PLAN NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION PLAN AUGUST 1999 Dedicated to JOHN WHITE A Bluemont resident since 1961 and former Association president, who has made our neighborhood a better place. Acknowledgments Many Bluemont residents helped create Jane Latta this plan. They include: Carl Laroche Doug Levin Carl Hallinan Jim McElfish (Bluemont Neighborhood Conservation Michele McClellan Plan [BNCP] Committee Chair) Marjorie Macieira Victor McMahon Gerry Procanick (BNCP Parks Subcommittee Co-Chair) (Bluemont Civic Association President and BNCP Commercial Subcommittee Co-Chair) Nancy Malin Louis Martin Ellen Armbruster Adrienne Pilot Robert Atkins Stacey Porro (BNCP Ordinances Subcommittee Chair) Bruce Reynolds Lynn Barton Dan Salsburg Brent Baxter Diane Schwarz Bernard Berne Patti Skinner Frank Bolger Carol Sloan Nancy Bort Barbara Szydla Kelly Christopher Brian Taylor Alicia Clark-Rochac Frank Tetreault Nathan Collamer John Van Doren Judy Collins Naomi Verdugo Worth Cooley-Prost (BNCP Tabulation Subcommittee Chair) Allen Cote Robert Waffle George Farah Charles Walden Ed Fendley Janet Weiner (BNCP Drafting Subcommittee Chair) (BNCP Streets Subcommittee Chair) Rene Gorski John White Joann Gottschalk Talmadge Williams (BNCP Parks Subcommittee Co-Chair) (BNCP Commercial Subcommittee Co-Chair) Pam Greene Lynne Willhoit Rick Hodges Alan Wright John Huennekens (BNCP History Subcommittee Chair) Many Arlington County employees also provided Sam Kubiak crucial guidance or assistance. The neighborhood’s (BNCP Traffic Calming Subcommittee Chair) special thanks go to Robert Collins, Chris Nixon, Jeff Sikes, Jim Allen, Nancy Michael and Jennifer King. Acknowledgements i Table of Contents Introduction ............................................ 1 Parks and Other Open Spaces .................23 Executive Summary ............................. 1 Overview ............................................. 23 Development of the Bluemont Parks and Open Space Map ................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents I
    Table of Contents I. Introduction Introduction Goals and Objectives Benefits of Green Space Green Space, Greenways, & Trail Types II. Regional Green Space and Greenways Framework Vision for Green Space in Metropolitan Washington Existing Green Space Network Green Space Opportunities and Challenges Regional Greenway Projects Accotink Greenway Anacostia Greenway Fort Circle Greenway Metropolitan Branch Trail and Prince George’s Connector Monocacy River Greenway Northwest Branch Greenway Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail Prince William County Potomac Heritage Trail Fairfax County Fairfax Heritage Trail and Potomac Heritage Trail Loudoun County Potomac Heritage Trail Prince George’s County Potomac River Greenway and Potomac Heritage Trail Washington, Baltimore & Annapolis Trail Community Greenway Access III. Implementation Strategy Overview of the Implementation Process Funding Opportunities Federal Funding State Funding Local Funding Private Funding Community Funding Acquisition and Development Alternatives Federal and State Agencies County and Local Governments Non-Governmental Organizations Private Landowners Management Agreements Management Techniques Safety and Security Maintenance Multi-Use Conflicts Liability Technical Assistance Community Outreach Techniques Confronting Opposition to Greenways Public Outreach Strategies IV. Greenway Resources and Contacts Bibliographical Resources Local Contacts Appendix List of Metropolitan Washington Proposed Greenways Introduction Green Space Past and Present From the National Mall to the region’s stream valley parks and outlying farmland, metropolitan Washington is characterized by natural beauty and green space. In 1791, Pierre L’Enfant laid out the District of Columbia between the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers with 17 park reservations, open space for memorials, civic art, institutions, and broad park-like streets and avenues creating a network of green space. This network was expanded in the late 1800s with the designation of Potomac Park, Rock Creek Park and Anacostia Park.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Appendix P – Bikeway Projects in Currently Approved Plans Planned
    Appendix P – Bikeway Projects in Currently Approved Plans Planned Improvements from Sector & Area Plans that have been added to the MTP Airport Viaduct Trail Connection to National Airport – Implement a pedestrian/bicycle facility on the viaduct structure to connect S. Eads Street and Crystal City with National Airport and the Mt. Vernon Trail. (Crystal City Sector Plan) Courthouse Road Bicycle Lanes Extension – Extension of the bicycle lanes on Courthouse Road between 14th Street and Clarendon/Wilson Boulevards. (Court House Sector Plan) Wilson Boulevard Protected Bicycle Lanes – Implement protected bicycle lanes on Wilson Boulevard from Arlington Ridge Drive to Courthouse Road. Currently partially implemented. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) Lynn Street Protected Bicycle Lanes – Implementation of protected bicycle lanes on N. Lynn Street between 17th Street and Lee Highway. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) Fort Myer Drive Protected Bicycle Lanes - Implementation of protected bicycle lanes on Fort Myer Drive between 17th Street and Lee Highway. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) N. Nash Street Protected Bicycle Lanes – Implementation of protected bicycle lanes on N. Nash Street between 19th Street and Wilson Boulevard. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) Lee Highway (eastbound) Bicycle Lane – Mark a bicycle lane along eastbound Lee Highway between N. Veitch and N. Lynn streets. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) 19th Street North Bicycle Lanes – Mark bicycle lanes on 19th Street North between N. Nash and N. Kent streets. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) Custis Trail at N. Lynn Street – Study the feasibility of implementing an underpass of Lynn Street for the Custis Trail. (Rosslyn Sector Plan) I-66 Overpass – Construct a multi-use trail overpass of I-66 to link 19th street and the Rosslyn Esplanade with the Potomac River shoreline and Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington County, Virginia H 4 a ( I V N A
    . N T. S C H 4T ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA H 4 A ( I V N A B . R 1 I 2 D 3 G ) Pimmit Run E Fishing R D E . IDG Access N BR CHAI - D N . A T R C . H . N P Parks & Off-Street Trails N L N D O . R . R N . L ST T I L S R C 1 I 4 N I H H 4 D . 1 M G R S D A G T O S E N T - U N E N . O N D O D . R 41ST O R S V L G N. T I ST. P . E E H W . N W S . N T T A R . D S S . H ST. N T 0T . H S 4 . I T L H 40T N P 40T H R N G A . T U H P N R L . O T . I T . N S S V 8 . N N T D E 3 . N A T R M A F R L O Y F S E - O T N R . R E M S R O AN B T D L D- E O . PH L - G . N C N. R E T S . T. I Z S T N R A . V t Ethan . For A R I M L . IX IE D L T L . N E W G . Y D I N P E T E Allen Park L N S S . T R - R A W H . I O T D E T R 0 A 4 ) .
    [Show full text]
  • NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program
    NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Naval District Washington NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK NSF Arlington Transportation Management Program Final February 2014 Prepared for: Prepared by: THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 6 4.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 47 1.1 Goals and Objectives 6 4.8 Variable Work Schedules 47 1.2 Transportation Management Programs 6 4.9 Guaranteed Ride Home 47 1.3 The Regional Transportation Vision 7 5.0 MASTER PLAN LAND USE PROPOSALS: TRANSPORTATION IMPLICATIONS 48 1.4 NSF Arlington 9 5.1 Anticipated Land Use Changes 48 2.0 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS 12 5.2 Employee Density Implications 48 2.1 Local Bus/Metrorail Services 13 5.3 Trip Generation / Modal Split Impacts 48 2.2 Nearby Transit Hub Centers 18 5.4 Master Plan Parking Supply Impacts 50 2.3 Commuter Rail Service 20 5.5 Multi-modal Provisions 50 2.4 Commuter Bus Service 21 6.0 PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT 52 2.5 Shuttle Service 22 PROGRAM 52 2.6 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities 22 6.1 Employee Transportation Coordinator 57 2.7 Roadways 24 6.2 Parking Management 57 2.8 Gate Counts and Vehicle Classification 26 6.3 Transit Subsidies 57 2.9 Parking 28 6.4 Alternative Work Schedule and Telecommuting 57 2.10 Ridesharing 30 6.5 Shuttle Service 57 2.11 Employee Survey Results 31 6.6 Ridesharing 3.0 AREA PLANNING CONTEXT 41 6.7 Active Commuting Programs (Bicycling and Walking) 58 3.1 Columbia Pike Land Use and Housing Planning Studies
    [Show full text]
  • ARLINGTON FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION PLAN December 31, 2021
    ARLINGTON FOREST NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION PLAN December 31, 2021 PHOTOS (clockwise from upper left, with photo credits) Street in Arlington Forest (Hutch Brown); Four Mile Run just below Huffman’s Falls (Hutch Brown); northern red oak leaves in Lubber Run Park (Hutch Brown); monarch butterfly on common milkweed in Arlington Forest (David Howell); raccoon in Lubber Run Park (David Howell); Arlington Forest Shopping Center (Dan Brown); red-tailed hawk in Arlington Forest (David Howell); American goldfinch in Arlington Forest (David Howell). CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Neighborhood Goals..................................................................................................................................... 14 Land Use and Zoning ................................................................................................................................... 16 Housing ........................................................................................................................................................ 22 Street Conditions .......................................................................................................................................... 25 Transportation/Traffic Management ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DC2RVA Tier II Final Environmental Impact Statement and Final
    CHAPTER 6 FINAL SECTION 4ΈfΉ EVALUATION 6 FINAL SECTION 4(f) EVALUATION 6.1 INTRODUCTION This Final Section 4(f) Evaluation follows the procedures for implementing Section 4(f) as outlined in 23 CFR 774 (March 12, 2008), which apply to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Although the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is not directly subject to this rule, FRA has determined that these procedures are appropriate for use for the proposed rail infrastructure improvements collectively known as the Washington, D.C. to Richmond Southeast High Speed Rail (DC2RVA) Project.1 The Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation was included as Chapter 5 of the Draft EIS2 and analyzed the potential impacts of the 23 Build Alternatives that were evaluated in that document. This Final Section 4(f) Evaluation considers the Preferred Alternative for the DC2RVA Project, which includes design modifications, additional data collected on cultural resources, and updates to parkland resources subsequent to the publication of the Draft EIS and its Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation. Refer to Chapter 4 of this Final EIS for details on the Preferred Alternative; additional data and updates to parkland resources since the Draft EIS are detailed within this chapter. This Final Section 4(f) Evaluation presents the following: . Summary of types of Section 4(f) properties, uses, and methodology (see Section 6.2) . Description of the Project and its Preferred Alternative (see Section 6.3) . Description of Section 4(f) properties that are within the Project limits (see Section 6.4) . Determination of Section 4(f) property uses (see Section 6.5) .
    [Show full text]