Bruce Rauner 42Nd Governor of Illinois
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Consequences of Illinois' 2015-2017 Budget Impasse and Fiscal Outlook Office of the Illinois Comptroller, Susana A
Consequences of Illinois' 2015-2017 Budget Impasse and Fiscal Outlook Office of the Illinois Comptroller, Susana A. Mendoza Introduction This article explores the state’s two-year budget impasse, which ended in 2017, some of the effects on state services, and, in particular, impacts on organizations serving the state’s most vulnerable populations. It comprises three sections that include: (1) background on the impasse and some historical perspective; (2) the impacts on social services and some of the state’s most vulnerable populations; and (3) a look to the future. While a budget agreement was reached for the current fiscal year, the state’s recovery is tenuous, with many programs and initiatives damaged badly due to the impasse, and many more unable to sustain another protracted budget stalemate. Illinois carries a significant bill backlog, which will need to be addressed to overcome systematic budget deficits. I. Background and historical facts The impasse that left Illinois without a fully appropriated budget for more than two years was the longest standstill of its kind in the state’s history. Beginning July 1, 2015, for 736 days, Illinois was without a complete budget, yet still made various payments as required by court orders, consent decrees and continuing appropriations. However, without a complete budget, many state commitments—mostly payments for social service programs, higher education, agency operations and state employee health insurance payments—remained insufficiently appropriated, creating uncertainty in payments for many reliant on state support. The impasse followed a partial roll-back in Illinois' income tax rates on January 1, 2015 that reduced annual state income tax revenues by more than $4.5 billion between fiscal year 2014 and fiscal year 2016.1 Illinois did not adequately control state spending at the same time revenues dropped, translating into a situation in which the state was increasingly unable to make timely payments to vendors. -
Interview with Dawn Clark Netsch # ISL-A-L-2010-013.07 Interview # 7: September 17, 2010 Interviewer: Mark Depue
Interview with Dawn Clark Netsch # ISL-A-L-2010-013.07 Interview # 7: September 17, 2010 Interviewer: Mark DePue COPYRIGHT The following material can be used for educational and other non-commercial purposes without the written permission of the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library. “Fair use” criteria of Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 must be followed. These materials are not to be deposited in other repositories, nor used for resale or commercial purposes without the authorization from the Audio-Visual Curator at the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library, 112 N. 6th Street, Springfield, Illinois 62701. Telephone (217) 785-7955 Note to the Reader: Readers of the oral history memoir should bear in mind that this is a transcript of the spoken word, and that the interviewer, interviewee and editor sought to preserve the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein. We leave these for the reader to judge. DePue: Today is Friday, September 17, 2010 in the afternoon. I’m sitting in an office located in the library at Northwestern University Law School with Senator Dawn Clark Netsch. Good afternoon, Senator. Netsch: Good afternoon. (laughs) DePue: You’ve had a busy day already, haven’t you? Netsch: Wow, yes. (laughs) And there’s more to come. DePue: Why don’t you tell us quickly what you just came from? Netsch: It was not a debate, but it was a forum for the two lieutenant governor candidates sponsored by the group that represents or brings together the association for the people who are in the public relations business. -
Legislative Oversight in Illinois
Legislative Oversight in Illinois Capacity and Usage Assessment Oversight through Analytic Bureaucracies: Moderate Oversight through the Appropriations Process: Moderate Oversight through Committees: Moderate Oversight through Administrative Rule Review: High Oversight through Advice and Consent: Moderate Oversight through Monitoring Contracts: Limited Judgment of Overall Institutional Capacity for Oversight: High Judgment of Overall Use of Institutional Capacity for Oversight: High Summary Assessment Illinois’ legislature appears to do an adequate job of overseeing the executive, despite having substantial institutional capacity to produce information and institutional structures that facilitate bipartisan participation. We note that the absence of recordings of oversight hearings and other committee hearings makes it very difficult to assess legislators’ performance on oversight. The appropriations process appears to be controlled by legislative leadership. And there is a contest of wills between the executive branch and the legislature that led to a two year budget stalemate. Major Strengths Illinois balances partisan membership on its oversight committee, the Legislature Audit Committee (LAC) and its Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR), which insures that the minority party has a voice in these hearings. The legislature’s rule review powers are extraordinarily strong—trending toward a legislative veto. Furthermore, the state’s legislature does appear to make substantial use of audit reports in creating legislation and during the budget and appropriations process. Joint committee meetings make it easier to communicate audit reports to both chambers. The appropriations process is often contentious, however, and appears to be infused with partisan politics. The Illinois General Assembly seems to scrutinize appointees thoroughly, and it intervenes in the governor’s efforts to reorganize agencies. -
Governors Conference on the Management of the Illinois River
I_cee_ags 1993 Governor's Conference On the Management Of the Illinois River System Fourth Biennial Conference September 21-22, 1993 Hotel P_re Marquette Peoria, lllinois OIS Prepared by Holly Korab, editor, University of Illinois Water Resources Center. Photos by Kay Kitchen-Maran, public affairs specialist, USDA Soil Conservation Service. Printed with financial support from the illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources. (400/February 1994) Printed on recycled paper. Procee_ngs 1993 Governor's Conference On the Management Of the Illinois River System Fourth Biennial Conference September 21-22, 1993 Hotel Pbrc Marquette Pcoria, Illinois Issued as Special Report No. 20 Water Resources Center University of Illinois 1101 W. Peabody Dr., Urbana, IL 61801 217/333-0536 Contents Acknowledgments Opening Address Robert W. Frazee ................................. 3 Session I. Citizen Initiative Reports Champaign County Pheasants Forever Filter Strip Feeding Program Mark Cander and Jane Kielzman ........................ 6 Site M: The Resource, the Opportunity and the Plan James R. Reynolds ................................ 8 Economic Impact of BASSMASTERS Superstars Tournament Lynn Uphoff .................................... 14 Neighbor to Neighbor Program Nancy Bennett ................................... 17 A Plan for an Illinois RiverWatch Network Using Citizen Volunteers Patrick Reese .................................... 19 Keynote Speech Mud, Flood and the Illinois River Stanley A. Changnon ............................... 28 Session II. Main River Issues Long Range Navigation Improvement on the Upper Mississippi River System and Illinois Waterway System Teresa Kitkeeng-Kincaid ............................. 42 Sedimentation and In-Stream Sediment Management Nani G. Bhowmik and Gary R. Clark .................... 47 Aquatic Habitats and Biodiversity of the Illinois River Drainage Kevin S. Cummings ............................... 62 Watershed Protection Approach-A Strategy for Comprehensive Resource Management Nancy J. Phillips and Thomas E. -
The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn Vs Rauner John S
Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC The imonS Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Simon Public Policy Institute) 1-2015 The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner John S. Jackson Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers Paper #40 of the Simon Review Recommended Citation Jackson, John S., "The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs Rauner" (2015). The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute). Paper 40. http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/ppi_papers/40 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Simon Review (Occasional Papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute) by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Simon Review The 2014 Illinois Governor Race: Quinn vs. Rauner By: John S. Jackson Paper #40 January 2015 A Publication of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute Southern Illinois University Carbondale Author’s Note: I want to thank Cary Day, Jacob Trammel and Roy E. Miller for their valuable assistance on this project. THE SIMON REVIEW The Simon Review papers are occasional nonacademic papers of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute at Southern Illinois University Carbondale that examine and explore public policy issues within the scope of the Institute’s mission and in the tradition of the University. The Paul Simon Public Policy Institute acts on significant and controversial issues impacting the region, the state, the nation, and the world. -
Precinct Report — Official
Precinct Report — Official City of Peoria — General Election — November 04, 2014 Page 1 of 445 11/18/2014 03:23 PM Total Number of Voters : 29,707 of 66,262 = 44.83% Precincts Reporting 95 of 95 = 100.00% Party Candidate Absentee Early Election Total Precinct 01 (Ballots Cast: 174) FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR, Vote For 1 James D. "Jim" Oberweis 0 0.00% 5 22.73% 15 14.02% 20 12.05% Richard J. Durbin 34 91.89% 17 77.27% 86 80.37% 137 82.53% Sharon Hansen 3 8.11% 0 0.00% 6 5.61% 9 5.42% Roger K. Davis (W) 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Cast Votes: 37 97.37% 22 95.65% 107 94.69% 166 95.40% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1 2.63% 1 4.35% 6 5.31% 8 4.60% FOR GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, Vote For 1 Bruce Rauner Evelyn Sanguinetti 1 2.70% 5 22.73% 19 17.43% 25 14.88% Pat Quinn Paul Vallas 36 97.30% 16 72.73% 86 78.90% 138 82.14% Chad Grimm Alexander Cummings 0 0.00% 1 4.55% 4 3.67% 5 2.98% Robert "Chico" Perez (W) 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Mark Smith (W) 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Michael W. Scruggs (W) 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Ryan Sweeney/Aaron Merreighn (W) 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Scott Summers (W) 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Cast Votes: 37 97.37% 22 95.65% 109 96.46% 168 96.55% Over Votes: 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% Under Votes: 1 2.63% 1 4.35% 4 3.54% 6 3.45% FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL, Vote For 1 Paul M. -
The Illinois Turnaround
The Illinois Turnaround Governor Bruce Rauner Our Goal: Make Illinois the Most Competitive and Compassionate State in America | 2 Illinois On Unsustainable Path Raising Taxes Alone Won’t Work | 3 Ability to be Compassionate Tax Revenues Government Education Bureaucracy Bureaucracy Service Providers Individuals Consumers/ Classrooms and Families Recipients in Need | 4 Competitiveness Tax Rates x Tax Base x Economic Activity = Tax Revenues | 5 Job Creation vs. Neighboring States 2003 – 2014 IL IN IA KY MO WI U.S. Total percentage 0.2% 3.8% 8.0% 5.3% 3.6% 4.3% 7.3% employment growth Annual compound 0.01% 0.3% 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% growth rate Cumulative job 10,300 109,900 115,900 94,500 96,300 120,500 9,520,000 growth Cumulative job growth per 1,000 0.80 16.66 37.30 21.41 15.88 20.93 29.86 people Multiple of Illinois 20.8x 46.6x 26.8x 19.9x 26.2x 37.3x growth Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics | 6 How Illinois Ranks 48th – Best States for Business 2014 Chief Executive Magazine F – Small Business Friendliness 2014 Thumbtack.com Small Business Friendliness Survey 35th – Small Business Policy 2014 Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council 31st – State Business Tax Climate 2015 Tax Foundation | 7 Top States for Business – 2014 Rank State Rank State 1 Texas 1 Georgia 2 Texas 2 Florida South 3 Tennessee 3 Carolina Ranking Criteria North Ranking Criteria 1.Business 4 Carolina 1. Tax and 4 Alabama Environment South Regulatory Regime 2. -
Title VII in Economic Stimulus Package
Friends of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) c/o American Public Health Association 800 I Street NW Washington DC, 20016 202-777-2513 February 11, 2009 Dear Conferee: The undersigned members of the Friends of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) coalition write in strong support of retaining the highest possible funding levels for HRSA’s community health centers and health workforce development programs in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 conference agreement. We believe that funding for community health centers and health workforce development in this bill are critical to improving the health of all Americans and reducing the growing economic and social costs associated with lack of access to primary and preventive health care services and providers. The Friends of HRSA coalition is a non-profit and non-partisan alliance of more than 120 national organizations, collectively representing millions of public health and health care professionals, academicians and consumers. Our member-organizations strongly support the programs at HRSA designed to ensure access to health services for each person in the U.S. and the elimination of health disparities. We are strong partners in supporting HRSA’s historic commitment to enhancing the health resources, workforce and infrastructure that lay the foundation for health care delivery in the United States. We strongly support the $600 million included in the House bill (H.R. 1) for the training of primary health care providers, including doctors, nurses and dentists, and urge that this funding be retained in the final conference agreement. We also support the $1.87 billion investment included in the Senate bill for addressing the construction, renovation and resource needs of our nation’s community health centers. -
Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 08/23/2021 9:43:38 AM Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 08/23/2021 9:43:38 AM
Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 08/23/2021 9:43:38 AM 08/20/21 Friday This material is distributed by Ghebi LLC on behalf of Federal State Unitary Enterprise Rossiya Segodnya International Information Agency, and additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia. 'Both Stick and Carrot': US Threatens Afghan Taliban With Terrorist List if it Repudiates Promises by Morgan Artvukhina \ US State Department spokesperson Ned Price said Friday that listing the Taliban* as a terrorist organization was one tool in several that Washington could use to lure the Afghan militant group into living up to its promises, which include renouncing terrorism and ending support for terrorist groups. Asked at a Friday press conference about whether the threat of being placed on the State Department's Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) list was a pressure tool Washington was using to get results from the Taliban, Price responded that it was. “We have a number of tools at our disposal. The Taliban, right now, is a specially designated global terrorist group. They’re on the SDGT designation list. That is one tool. It’s both a stick and ...a carrot, a potential inducement, to induce the Taliban to uphold those basic international norms, the basic rights of its people," Price said. "But the FTO list, other sanctions, that’s one single tool.” The SDGT list, maintained by the US Treasury, is used for applying financial sanctions to groups that frustrate their operations, while the FTO prohibits material support for them and is much higher profile. -
Governor's Rural Affairs Council (Executive Order 11-04)
Governor’s Rural Affairs Council (Executive Order 11-04) 2020 Annual Report Chaired by Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton Governor’s Rural Affairs Council Letter from Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton In my time as Lieutenant Governor, one of my greatest responsibilities and privileges has been championing the voices of Illinoisans. I have always believed the only path to enact real and sustainable change is one rooted in a pursuit of equity. Chairing the Governor’s Rural Affairs Council, and working on this report, was a charge I met with this in mind. But above all else, it was crucial that I took the time to listen and learn. Doing this gave me insight that I, growing up in the city of Chicago, may not have previously had. The well-being of each of our communities is tied to that of the others. Rural Illinois, in many ways, serves as the backbone for its suburban and urban counterparts. Agriculture and manufacturing jobs are at the root of the state’s economy, sustaining our growth and the livelihood of communities throughout Illinois. Illinoisans are also connected by the challenges they face, such as a need for better healthcare. The opioid crisis severely harms communities both rural and urban, with devastating impacts on families across the state. It is abundantly clear to me, now more than ever, that the concerns of rural Illinois are deeply entwined with the concerns of our state as a whole. What we must also remember is that the statistics and trends we have compiled in this report represent real people. -
Specimen Ballot Mason County, Illinois General
SPECIMEN BALLOT FEDERAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICE REGION MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR FOR REGIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS GENERAL ELECTION (Vote for one) (MASON, TAZEWELL AND WOODFORD COUNTIES) NOVEMBER 4, 2014 RICHARD J. DURBIN DEMOCRATIC (Vote for one) REPUBLICAN No Candidate DEMOCRATIC I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SPECIMEN BALLOT IS A TRUE AND JAMES D. "JIM" OBERWEIS CORRECT COPY OF THE OFFICES AND CANDIDATES TO BE VOTED IN SHARON HANSEN LIBERTARIAN GAIL S. OWEN REPUBLICAN THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN MASON COUNTY ON Write-in COUNTY BOARD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2014. STATE FOR MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY BOARD FOR GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DISTRICT ONE (Vote for one) (Vote for not more than two) ELDON H. GARLISCH DEMOCRATIC SUMMER R. BROWN, COUNTY CLERK (PAT QUINN MASON COUNTY, ILLINOIS (PAUL VALLAS DEMOCRATIC ROBERT D. HARRIS DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS (BRUCE RAUNER REBECCA SWITZER REPUBLICAN "NOTICE (EVELYN SANGUINETTI REPUBLICAN FOR MEMBERS OF THE COUNTY BOARD THE FAILURE TO VOTE THIS BALLOT MAY BE THE (CHAD GRIMM DISTRICT TWO EQUIVALENT OF A NEGATIVE VOTE, BECAUSE A (ALEXANDER CUMMINGS LIBERTARIAN (Vote for not more than two) CONVENTION SHALL BE CALLED OR THE AMENDMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE IF APPROVED BY EITHER ( Write-In __________________________________________________________ KENNETH WALKER DEMOCRATIC THREE-FIFTHS OF THOSE VOTING ON THE QUESTION OR ( RICHARD SHOEMAKER DEMOCRATIC A MAJORITY OF THOSE VOTING IN THE ELECTION. (THIS IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A DIRECTION THAT YOUR FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL TONY GATHMAN REPUBLICAN VOTE IS REQUIRED TO BE CAST EITHER IN FAVOR OF OR (Vote for one) HUGH McHARRY REPUBLICAN IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSITION HEREIN LISA MADIGAN DEMOCRATIC CONTAINED.) BOARD OF REVIEW PAUL M. -
Colbert V. Pritzker
Case: 1:07-cv-04737 Document #: 367 Filed: 01/13/20 Page 1 of 159 PageID #:3164 Colbert v. Pritzker Case No. 07-C4737 (N.D. Ill.) Court Monitor FY2019 Compliance Assessment Annual Report to the Court Gail P. Hutchings, MPA Court Monitor January 13, 2020 Case: 1:07-cv-04737 Document #: 367 Filed: 01/13/20 Page 2 of 159 PageID #:3164 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………….…………….…….Page ii Section I: Introduction.……………………………….……………………..……Page 1 Section II: Overview of FY2019 Compliance Assessment Findings………Page 10 Section III: Outreach to Colbert Class Members……………..…….…….…Page 13 Section IV: Evaluation of Colbert Class Members.………….……..…….…Page 24 Section V: Service Planning for Colbert Class Members.…...……….….…Page 39 Section VI: Transition Activities to Support Class Members.…………...….Page 52 Section VII: Community-Based Services and Housing Development…….Page 69 Section VIII: Administrative Requirements.…………..............................…Page 81 Section IX: Implementation Planning…….……….....................................Page 101 Section X: Quality Assurance – Class Member Safety and Mortality……Page 109 Conclusion………………………………….…………..............................…Page 111 Appendix A: Compliance Assessment Ratings for All Colbert Consent Decree, Updated Cost Neutral Plan, and FY2019 Implementation Plan Requirements……. …………………………………………………………………………….......Appendix 1 i Case: 1:07-cv-04737 Document #: 367 Filed: 01/13/20 Page 3 of 159 PageID #:3164 Executive Summary This report is intended to provide Judge Joan Lefkow, Senior United States District Judge, Northern District of Illinois, and the Colbert Consent Decree Parties with the Court Monitor’s thorough assessment of the Defendants’ (and others when relevant) fiscal year 2019 (FY2019) performance under Colbert v. Pritzker (Case No. 07-C737). Specifically the report assesses compliance with the obligations of the Colbert Consent Decree, Updated Cost Neutral Plan, and FY2019 Implementation Plan.