Expansion and Impact of Laurel Wilt in the Florida Everglades

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Scientific Notes 1247 EXPANSION AND IMPACT OF LAUREL WILT IN THE FLORIDA EVERGLADES 1, 2 3 LEROY RODGERS *, ANDREW DERKSEN AND TONY PERNAS 1South Florida Water Management District. Land Resources Bureau, West Palm Beach, FL 33406, USA 2Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Miami, FL 33158, USA 3National Park Service, Florida/Caribbean Exotic Plant Management Team, Palmetto Bay, FL 33157, USA *Corresponding author; E-mail: [email protected] Tree islands are a prominent feature of the Aerial surveys were conducted during Mar– Florida Everglades landscape. These ovoid patch- May 2011, and May–Jun 2013 to determine the es of forest vegetation are scattered throughout distribution and abundance of the wilt in and ad- a matrix of herbaceous marsh and are important jacent to the Everglades. Tree islands displaying contributors to Everglades biodiversity and fun- symptomatic trees were recorded using a digital damental ecosystem processes. Tree islands have aerial sketch mapping system during planned high species diversity, provide wading bird nest- invasive plant surveys (see Rodgers et al. 2014). ing habitat, and provide critical upland habitat Observers recorded presence and abundance of for wildlife during the wet season. Everglades symptomatic swamp bay trees along fixed flight tree islands also play a key role in biogeochemical transects spaced 1-km apart, allowing for com- cycling and serve as nutrient sinks, particularly plete coverage of the survey area (Fig. 1). Ob- in the case of phosphorus (Wetzel et al. 2005). As servers digitized clusters of symptomatic trees as such, tree island protection and restoration are polygons using field mapping software (GeoLink® increasingly viewed as priorities in the national SketchmapperTM) and estimated percent cover of Everglades restoration effort (Sklar & Van der canopy damage for each polygon. Data were im- Valk 2003). ported into a GIS (ESRI® ArcGIS Desktop™) to Swamp bay (Persea palustris (Raf.) Sarg.) measure the proportion of tree island canopy with (Laurales: Lauraceae) is a common tree species laurel wilt symptoms and range of occupancy of Everglades tree islands (Heisler et al. 2002), (generalized area containing symptomatic trees but ranges from dominant to absent in individu- within the survey area). Digital aerial imagery al islands (Wetzel et al. 2008; Engel et al. 2009; and tree island species composition data (Engel et Brandt et al. 2003). The tree also carries cultural al. 2009) were used to estimate the proportion of significance in the Everglades as its bark and tree islands with swamp bay affected by the wilt. leaves are key reagents in traditional Seminole Within 2 months of both surveys, sapwood medicine (Snow & Stans 2001). Swamp bay is one samples were collected from a subset of symptom- of several members of the Lauraceae affected by atic trees and submitted for testing to the FDACS laurel wilt in the southeastern USA. Laurel wilt Plant Pathology Laboratory in Gainesville, Flor- is a vascular wilt disease caused by Raffaelea lau- ida. Fungi were isolated from samples following ricola T.C. Harr. (Ophiostomatales: Ophiostoma- Fraedrich et al. (2008), and confirmed using the taceae), a symbiont of its vector, the exotic redbay morphological and molecular methods described ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff in Harmon & Brown (2009). (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) (Fraed- During the 2011 aerial survey, symptomatic rich et al. 2008). trees were observed within a 4,925 ha range of Xyleborus glabratus was first collected in the occupancy in the eastern Everglades (Fig. 1). The United States near Port Wentworth, Georgia in greatest concentration of symptomatic trees oc- 2002 (Rabaglia et al. 2006), and by 2004, laurel curred in tree islands and artificially elevated wilt was associated with extensive mortality of sites (ditch spoil mounds) within partially drained redbay (P. borbonia (L.) Spreng.) (Fraedrich et wetlands adjacent to ENP. Two tree islands with- al. 2008). Since then, the vector and its phyto- in ENP harbored symptomatic trees. Sampling of pathogenic symbiont have spread throughout the 46 of the symptomatic trees confirmed that 80.5% southern Atlantic coastal plain (USDA 2014), with tested positive for R. lauricola. The 2013 survey localized losses of redbay populations exceeding revealed a substantial increase in the range of 80% (Fraedrich et al. 2008). The beetle was first occupancy (133,740 ha) (Fig. 1). Laurel wilt had detected in Miami-Dade County just outside Ever- spread further west into ENP, Water Conserva- glades National Park (ENP) in Feb 2010 (Griffiths tion Area (WCA) 3, and Big Cypress National & Derksen 2010), and laurel wilt was confirmed on Preserve. The westerly expansion is not unex- swamp bay only a few miles away from the initial pected given the prevailing winds from the east capture in February 2011 (Ploetz et al. 2011). and southeast, especially in the spring and fall 1248 Florida Entomologist 97(3) September 2014 Fig. 1. The distribution and proportions of the canopy occupied by trees with symptoms of laurel wilt in Ever- glades natural areas (2011 and 2013). when adult beetle emergence peaks (Brar et al. neighbor analysis of tree islands with symptom- 2012; Maner et al. 2013). Symptomatic swamp atic trees revealed that the mean minimum dis- bay were observed in 322 tree islands and along tance between symptomatic tree islands was 1.0 ditches, canals, and roads within the survey area. km and the maximum nearest neighbor distance Raffaelea lauricola was recovered from 93.3% of was 11.8 km. the samples taken from symptomatic trees at 15 In 2013, tree islands with at least 1 symptom- locations. atic swamp bay had a median canopy damage of The western edge of the laurel wilt focus ex- 5.0% (interquartile range 2.5 to 10.0%). An analy- panded by an average of 53.3 ± 1.5 SE km be- sis of tree island canopy composition (Engel et al. tween 2011 and 2013. Assuming a constant rate 2009) within the 2013 range of occupancy indi- of expansion during the 2 yr, laurel wilt spread cates that swamp bay importance values (sum of across the east-central Everglades at 26.6 km/ relative tree density and basal area) range from yr, which falls in the lower range of the Koch & 0 to 43.4 (mean = 3.8), suggesting a wide range Smith (2008) estimates (24 to 55 km/yr). Koch of potential canopy loss among tree islands. Tree & Smith’s expansion estimates were associated islands with high swamp bay importance values with highly variable habitats in more temper- are expected to sustain substantial canopy loss, ate environments and involved a different host as observed for some tree islands in this survey species, redbay. Although the present data were (maximum estimated canopy damage = 50%). from a relatively uniform subtropical habitat and Within the current range of occupancy, 76% another host species, swamp bay, they may pro- of the tree islands known to include swamp bay vide a better estimate of how quickly laurel wilt were not yet symptomatic, suggesting that lau- can spread in the absence of anthropogenic move- rel wilt will cause additional mortality. We note ment. The clustered distribution of tree islands that the disease was rare in the southwest por- across the Everglades landscape may also provide tion of Water Conservation Area 3 (WCA 3) (Fig. insight into the capacity of R. lauricola vectors 1) where high importance values of swamp bay to naturally disperse long distances. A nearest would predict the presence of laurel wilt. Factors Scientific Notes 1249 associated with this apparent low rate of wilt de- por los P. palustris con sintomos de la marchitez velopment should be identified. del laurel en las islas de árboles en los Evergla- The response of Everglades tree islands to sud- des en marzo del 2011 y junio del 2013 utilizando den canopy loss is difficult to predict and warrants un sistema para hacer mapas de imágenes aéreas future evaluation. An abrupt loss of tree island digitales. El rango geográfico ocupado por la en- canopy where swamp bay is an important com- fermedad incrementó de 4,925 a 133,740 hectá- ponent could reduce peat accretion rates (Cahoon reas durante este período de 26 meses. El daño et al. 2003) and lead to reduced tree island eleva- del dosel fue altamente variable de una pérdida tion and stability (Wetzel et al. 2005). Canopy del 0 a 50 % del dosel. Sin embargo, los datos de disturbance also influences the ease with which la composición de especies de árboles en las islas communities are invaded (Eschtruth & Battles sugieren que probablemente hay mas mortalidad 2009). Lynch et al. (2009) reported increased colo- de P. palustris en los Everglades. La pérdida rá- nization of Everglades tree islands by the exotic pida de P. palustris en las islas de árboles podría Old World climbing fern (Lygodium microphyl- resultar en la inestabilidad a nivel de ecosistemas lum (Cav.) R. Br.; Polypodiales: Lygodiaceae) af- y la invasión de especies exóticas de plantas. ter hurricane-induced canopy disturbances and Palabras Claves: isla árbol, hacer mapas de Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi; imágenes aéreas digitales, Persea palustris, Ra- Sapindales: Anacardiaceae) colonizes canopy ffaelea lauricola, Xyleborus glabratus gaps and eventually dominates heavily impacted tree islands (Rodgers et al. 2014). Everglades REFERENCES CITED land managers are encouraged to increase inva- sive plant monitoring and control efforts in tree BRANDT, L. A., ECKER, D., GOMEZ RIVERA, I., TRAUT, A., islands where substantial canopy has been lost AND MAZZOTTI, F. J. 2003. Wildlife and vegetation of due to laurel wilt. bayhead islands in Arthur R. Marshall Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge. Southeastern Nat. 2:179- 194. SUMMARY BRAR, G. S., CAPINERA, J. L., MCLEAN, S., KENDRA, P. E., PLOETZ, R. C., AND PEÑA, J. E. 2012. Effect of Laurel wilt, a vascular wilt disease caused by trap size, trap height and age of lure on sampling the vascular mycopathogen Raffaelea lauricola Xyleborus glabratus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: T.C.
Recommended publications
  • Approved Plant List 10/04/12

    Approved Plant List 10/04/12

    FLORIDA The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time to plant a tree is today. City of Sunrise Approved Plant List 10/04/12 Appendix A 10/4/12 APPROVED PLANT LIST FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES SG xx Slow Growing “xx” = minimum height in Small Mature tree height of less than 20 feet at time of planting feet OH Trees adjacent to overhead power lines Medium Mature tree height of between 21 – 40 feet U Trees within Utility Easements Large Mature tree height greater than 41 N Not acceptable for use as a replacement feet * Native Florida Species Varies Mature tree height depends on variety Mature size information based on Betrock’s Florida Landscape Plants Published 2001 GROUP “A” TREES Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Avocado Persea Americana L Bahama Strongbark Bourreria orata * U, SG 6 S Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum * L Black Olive Shady Bucida buceras ‘Shady Lady’ L Lady Black Olive Bucida buceras L Brazil Beautyleaf Calophyllum brasiliense L Blolly Guapira discolor* M Bridalveil Tree Caesalpinia granadillo M Bulnesia Bulnesia arboria M Cinnecord Acacia choriophylla * U, SG 6 S Group ‘A’ Plant List for Single Family Homes Common Name Botanical Name Uses Mature Tree Size Citrus: Lemon, Citrus spp. OH S (except orange, Lime ect. Grapefruit) Citrus: Grapefruit Citrus paradisi M Trees Copperpod Peltophorum pterocarpum L Fiddlewood Citharexylum fruticosum * U, SG 8 S Floss Silk Tree Chorisia speciosa L Golden – Shower Cassia fistula L Green Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus * L Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba * L
  • Impacts of Laurel Wilt Disease on Native Persea of the Southeastern United States Timothy M

    Impacts of Laurel Wilt Disease on Native Persea of the Southeastern United States Timothy M

    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 5-2016 Impacts of Laurel Wilt Disease on Native Persea of the Southeastern United States Timothy M. Shearman Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Shearman, Timothy M., "Impacts of Laurel Wilt Disease on Native Persea of the Southeastern United States" (2016). All Dissertations. 1656. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1656 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IMPACTS OF LAUREL WILT DISEASE ON NATIVE PERSEA OF THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Forest Resources by Timothy M. Shearman May 2016 Accepted by: Dr. G. Geoff Wang, Committee Chair Dr. Saara J. DeWalt Dr. Donald L. Hagan Dr. Julia L. Kerrigan Dr. William C. Bridges ABSTRACT Laurel Wilt Disease (LWD) has caused severe mortality in native Persea species of the southeastern United States since it was first detected in 2003. This study was designed to document the range-wide population impacts to LWD, as well as the patterns of mortality and regeneration in Persea ecosystems. I used Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data from the U.S. Forest Service to estimate Persea borbonia (red bay) populations from 2003 to 2011 to see if any decline could be observed since the introduction of LWD causal agents.
  • The Natural Communities of South Carolina

    The Natural Communities of South Carolina

    THE NATURAL COMMUNITIES OF SOUTH CAROLINA BY JOHN B. NELSON SOUTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE & MARINE RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FEBRUARY 1986 INTRODUCTION The maintenance of an accurate inventory of a region's natural resources must involve a system for classifying its natural communities. These communities themselves represent identifiable units which, like individual plant and animal species of concern, contribute to the overall natural diversity characterizing a given region. This classification has developed from a need to define more accurately the range of natural habitats within South Carolina. From the standpoint of the South Carolina Nongame and Heritage Trust Program, the conceptual range of natural diversity in the state does indeed depend on knowledge of individual community types. Additionally, it is recognized that the various plant and animal species of concern (which make up a significant remainder of our state's natural diversity) are often restricted to single natural communities or to a number of separate, related ones. In some cases, the occurrence of a given natural community allows us to predict, with some confidence, the presence of specialized or endemic resident species. It follows that a reasonable and convenient method of handling the diversity of species within South Carolina is through the concept of these species as residents of a range of natural communities. Ideally, a nationwide classification system could be developed and then used by all the states. Since adjacent states usually share a number of community types, and yet may each harbor some that are unique, any classification scheme on a national scale would be forced to recognize the variation in a given community from state to state (or region to region) and at the same time to maintain unique communities as distinctive.
  • Borbonia, to Raffaelea Spp. Isolated from Xyleborus Glabratus

    Borbonia, to Raffaelea Spp. Isolated from Xyleborus Glabratus

    Received: 20 November 2016 Accepted: 9 May 2016 DOI: 10.1111/efp.12288 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Response of swamp bay, Persea palustris, and redbay, P. borbonia, to Raffaelea spp. isolated from Xyleborus glabratus T. J. Dreaden1,2 | A. S. Campbell3 | C. A. Gonzalez-Benecke4 | R. C. Ploetz3 | J. A. Smith1 1School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Summary Gainesville, FL, USA Laurel wilt is a devastating invasive disease of members of the Lauraceae plant 2 USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research family. It is caused by the fungus Raffaelea lauricola, which is a nutritional symbiont Station, Forest Health Research and Education Center, Lexington, KY, USA of its ambrosia beetle vector, Xyleborus glabratus. In the United States, six Raffaelea 3Tropical Research & Education Center, spp., in addition to R. lauricola, have been recovered from mycangia of X. glabratus. University of Florida, Homestead, FL, USA We compared the response of two laurel wilt suspects, swamp bay (Persea palustris) 4Department of Forest Engineering, Resources & Management, Oregon State and redbay (Persea borbonia), to five of these species, another undescribed Raffaelea University, Corvallis, OR, USA sp., and R. lauricola. Six weeks after inoculation, only R. lauricola caused significantly greater symptoms than water inoculations. The fungi varied in their ability to move Correspondence Tyler J Dreaden, USDA-Forest Service, systemically and be recovered from the host at the end of the experiment. Stem Southern Research Station, Forest hydraulic conductivity was decreased by R. lauricola, but none of the other taxa. Health Research and Education Center, Lexington, KY, USA. Although the roles these fungi play in the life cycle of X.
  • Floral Developmental Morphology of Persea Americana (Avocado, Lauraceae): the Oddities of Male Organ Identity Author(S): Matyas Buzgo, André S

    Floral Developmental Morphology of Persea Americana (Avocado, Lauraceae): the Oddities of Male Organ Identity Author(S): Matyas Buzgo, André S

    Floral Developmental Morphology of Persea americana (Avocado, Lauraceae): The Oddities of Male Organ Identity Author(s): Matyas Buzgo, André S. Chanderbali, Sangtae Kim, Zhengui Zheng, David G. Oppenheimer, Pamela S. Soltis, and Douglas E. Soltis Reviewed work(s): Source: International Journal of Plant Sciences, Vol. 168, No. 3 (March/April 2007), pp. 261- 284 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/510297 . Accessed: 09/02/2013 21:46 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to International Journal of Plant Sciences. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:46:31 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Int. J. Plant Sci. 168(3):261–284. 2007. Ó 2007 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2007/16803-0002$15.00 FLORAL DEVELOPMENTAL MORPHOLOGY OF PERSEA AMERICANA (AVOCADO, LAURACEAE): THE ODDITIES OF MALE ORGAN IDENTITY Matyas Buzgo,1,* Andre´ S. Chanderbali,*,y Sangtae Kim,* Zhengui Zheng,* David G. Oppenheimer,*,z Pamela S. Soltis,y and Douglas E.
  • Borbonia, to Raffaelea Spp. Isolated from Xyleborus Glabratus

    Borbonia, to Raffaelea Spp. Isolated from Xyleborus Glabratus

    Received: 20 November 2016 Accepted: 9 May 2016 DOI: 10.1111/efp.12288 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Response of swamp bay, Persea palustris, and redbay, P. borbonia, to Raffaelea spp. isolated from Xyleborus glabratus T. J. Dreaden1,2 | A. S. Campbell3 | C. A. Gonzalez-Benecke4 | R. C. Ploetz3 | J. A. Smith1 1School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Summary Gainesville, FL, USA Laurel wilt is a devastating invasive disease of members of the Lauraceae plant 2 USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research family. It is caused by the fungus Raffaelea lauricola, which is a nutritional symbiont Station, Forest Health Research and Education Center, Lexington, KY, USA of its ambrosia beetle vector, Xyleborus glabratus. In the United States, six Raffaelea 3Tropical Research & Education Center, spp., in addition to R. lauricola, have been recovered from mycangia of X. glabratus. University of Florida, Homestead, FL, USA We compared the response of two laurel wilt suspects, swamp bay (Persea palustris) 4Department of Forest Engineering, Resources & Management, Oregon State and redbay (Persea borbonia), to five of these species, another undescribed Raffaelea University, Corvallis, OR, USA sp., and R. lauricola. Six weeks after inoculation, only R. lauricola caused significantly greater symptoms than water inoculations. The fungi varied in their ability to move Correspondence Tyler J Dreaden, USDA-Forest Service, systemically and be recovered from the host at the end of the experiment. Stem Southern Research Station, Forest hydraulic conductivity was decreased by R. lauricola, but none of the other taxa. Health Research and Education Center, Lexington, KY, USA. Although the roles these fungi play in the life cycle of X.
  • Redbay (Persea Borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion by Dr

    Redbay (Persea Borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion by Dr

    Native Tree Series WSFNR12-9 May 2012 Redbay (Persea borbonia): Drifting Toward Oblivion by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care At the edge of streams, springs, and swamps hides the redbay tree. Redbay (Persea borbonia), with its evergreen aromatic leathery leaves, dark blue fruit hanging on into winter, and reddish bark, is a jewel among trees. The Native Americans found a host of medicinal uses for this medium sized tree. Early European Ameri- cans found the fine grained, highly polished wood to be perfect trim for bay boats and sailing ships. Southern gumbos require redbay leaf flavoring to be authentic. Now exotic pests threaten this unique American tree. This publication is designed to assist people understand the great variability and confusion regarding redbay taxonomy, its lineage, where it grows, its identifying characteristics, and stress problems. Scientific Choices The scientific name today for redbay is Persea borbonia, but that was not always the case. Redbay was first clearly identified in 1739 and taken for plant collections. Redbay has had a number of different scientific names. The genus and this species have many overlapping descriptions with various other species, varieties and forms, leading to taxonomic confusion. The genus name Persea was first used in 1601 and is a Greek derived name for a middle-Eastern or Persian tree with fruit growing from its stem. Over the years, this genus has been called many things including Persea (1601), Laurus (1731), Borbonia (1760), Farnesia (1763), Menestrata (1835), Tamala (1838), and Nothaphoebe (1898). Other early scientific names for redbay included Laurus caroliniensis (1731), Laurus borbonia (1753), Laurus axillaris (1789), Laurus elongata (1796), Borbonia caroliniensis (1825), Persea caroliniensis (1836), Tamala borbonia (1838), Tamala caroliniensis (1838), Nothaphoebe borbonica (1898), Persea littoralis (1903), Tamala littoralis (1913), Borbonia borbonia (1922), and Borbonia littoralis (1922).
  • Disease Biology and Host- Pathogen Interactions

    Disease Biology and Host- Pathogen Interactions

    Disease biology and host- pathogen interactions Randy Ploetz University of Florida, Department of Plant Pathology, Tropical Research & Education Center, IFAS, 18905 SW 280th Street, Homestead, FL 33031-3314. e-mail: [email protected] Hosts • Lauraceae (Magnoliid complex, Laurales) Hosts • Lauraceae (Magnoliid complex, Laurales) • Avocado (Persea americana) o MesoAmerican origins o Most important crop in family o 4.7 million metric tonnes, 2013 o Mexico no. 1 producer. CA ($350 million) and FL ($50 million) are most important US producers. Hosts • Lauraceae (Magnoliid complex, Laurales) • Avocado (Persea americana) • Native trees Susceptible species in the Southeastern USA include several native trees Persea borbonia Persea humilis Licaria trianda Sassafras albidum Persea palustris Ocotea coricea Lindera melissifolia Susceptible species in the Southeastern USA include several native trees, some of which are only moderately susceptible Persea borbonia Persea humilis Licaria trianda Sassafras albidum Persea palustris Ocotea coricea Lindera melissifolia Hosts • Lauraceae (Magnoliid complex, Laurales) • Avocado (Persea americana) • Native trees Southeastern USA: redbay, swamp bay, silk bay, sasafrass (lancewood, gulf licaria) Tropical America: Lauraceae well represented. Besides avocado, Persea liebmannii (aka podadenia) and others?? Hosts • Lauraceae (Magnoliid complex, Laurales) • Avocado (Persea americana) • Native trees Southeastern USA: redbay, swamp bay, silk bay, sasafrass, et al. Tropical America: Lauraceae well represented. Persea liebmannii (aka podadenia) Asia: Lauraceae also well represented. Hosts? Pathogen Raffaelea lauricola (Eukaryota: Eumycota: Ascomycota: Ophiostomatales) Pathogen Raffaelea lauricola (Eukaryota: Eumycota: Ascomycota: Ophiostomatales) Raffaelea spp. are confused taxonomically. Raffaelea sensu lato Dreaden et al. 2015 Pathogen Raffaelea lauricola (Eukaryota: Eumycota: Ascomycota: Ophiostomatales) Raffaelea spp. are confused taxonomically. They are nutritional symbionts of ambrosia beetles, and are predominantly not plant pathogens.
  • Laurel Wilt and Redbay Ambrosia Beetle

    Laurel Wilt and Redbay Ambrosia Beetle

    SREF-FH-006 November 2016 to its widespread distribution and Biology, Ecology, and Management of Laurel Wilt the high level of mortality that laurel wilt causes in forests and natural and the Redbay Ambrosia Beetle areas, understanding and effectively managing this disease is necessary to AUTHORED BY: MARC A. HUGHES, JASON A. SMITH, AND DAVID R. COYLE maintain the health of southeastern U.S. forests and the plants, animals, and humans that rely on them. Current Distribution The redbay ambrosia beetle was first detected in 2002 near Port Wentworth, Georgia10. Laurel wilt has now spread to nine states in the southeastern U.S. (Fig. 1) and is likely to keep expanding to new areas. Laurel wilt is spread over long distances by the flight of the redbay ambrosia beetle and human movement of beetle-infested wood. Early in the invasion, it was estimated that the redbay ambrosia beetle was spreading at a rate of 34 miles/year18. Long range jumps in geographic distribution are suspected to be due to human movement of beetle- infested wood, a common transport avenue for wood-boring insects. Figure 1. Distribution of laurel wilt infected counties (as of September 2016). Colors indicate year of initial detection. For an updated map, see http://www.fs.usda.gov/main/r8/forest- grasslandhealth. Plant Hosts Laurel wilt is a lethal tree disease caused by a fungal pathogen (Raffaelea Laurel wilt affects members of the lauricola), which is a nutritional symbiont of a non-native wood-boring beetle laurel family (Lauraceae) (Table 1). So (the redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus)8,14.
  • Redbay ( Persea Borbonia )

    Redbay ( Persea Borbonia )

    Redbay (Persea borbonia): A Tree Of Confusion by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia 7/2006 At the edge of streams, springs, and swamps hides the redbay tree. Redbay (Persea borbonia), with its evergreen aromatic leathery leaves, dark blue fruit hanging on into winter, and reddish bark is a jewel among trees. The Native Americans found a host of medicinal uses for this medium sized tree. Early European Americans found the fine grained, highly polished wood to be perfect trim for bay boats and sailing ships. Southern gumbos require redbay leaf flavoring to be authentic. Now exotic pests threaten this unique American tree. This publication is to assist people understand the great variability and confusion regarding redbay taxonomy, its lineage and where it grows. Scientific Name Choices The scientific name for redbay is Persea borbonia. Redbay was first clearly identified in 1739 and taken for plant collections. Redbay has had a number of different scientific names over the years. The genus and this species have many overlapping descriptions with various other species, varieties and forms, leading to taxonomic confusion. The genus name Persea was first used in 1601 and is a Greek derived name for a middle-eastern or Persian tree with fruit growing from its stem. Over the years, this genus has been called many things including Persea (1601), Laurus (1731), Borbonia (1760), Farnesia (1763), Menestrata (1835), Tamala (1838), and Nothaphoebe (1898). Other early scientific names for redbay included Laurus caroliniensis (1731), Laurus borbonia (1753), Laurus axillaris (1789), Laurus elongata (1796), Borbonia caroliniensis (1825), Persea caroliniensis (1836), Tamala borbonia (1838), Tamala caroliniensis (1838), Nothaphoebe borbonica (1898), Persea littoralis (1903), Tamala littoralis (1913), Borbonia borbonia (1922), and Borbonia littoralis (1922).
  • Persea Palustris)

    Persea Palustris)

    Butterflies of Southwest Florida Kara Tyler-Julian Riverdale Library March 9, 2019 Butterflies and moths – Order Lepidoptera – 2 pairs of wings, covered in scales – Long retractable proboscis – Around 13,000 species in NA (700 butterflies) – Butterflies: wings above, day flight, bright colors, thin antennae – Moths: wings like tent, night flight, dull colors, bushy antennae Lepidoptera- Butterflies and moths – Holometabolous-Metamorphosis- 4 stages Egg Larva=caterpillar Pupa=Chrysalis Adult=Butterfly Caterpillars – Growing stage – Eat a lot – Molt to grow (5-7 times!) – Different plants for different species – Chewing mouthparts= plant damage Pupa: Chrysalis/cocoon – Changing into butterfly/moth – Cells are rearranging, body parts changing – Few weeks-many months – Vulnerable, accidents can happen Adults: Butterflies – Drink a lot of nectar – Pollinators – Reproduce – Don’t live very long – Movement DANGER-Natural threats – Diseases: virus, bacteria, protozoans, fungi – Predators-wasps, lizards, birds, etc. – Parasitoids- tiny wasps, flies – Poisons Danger: Man-made Climate Habitat Plant loss change loss Pesticides Pollution Cars How can you help? – Plant host plants for caterpillars – Plant nectar plants for butterflies – Don’t use pesticides – Weeds are good! – Help fight climate change – Help preserve wild areas – Butterfliesandmoths.org Nymphalidae: Danaus plexippus- Monarch, Danaus gilippus- Queen, Danaus eresimus - Soldier Photo:John Garbutt Danaus plexippus- Monarch, Danaus gilippus- Queen, Danaus eresimus - Soldier Asclepias spp.
  • Bays, Beetles, and Butterflies

    Bays, Beetles, and Butterflies

    Myakka River State Park January 2019 Bays, Beetles, and Butterflies A few years ago, I was walking along Ranch House Road when I noticed a small bay tree. This tree stood out because all of its leaves were uniformly brown, almost as if they had been spray painted. The leaves clung to the branches tightly, but the tree was already dead. This tree was the victim of Laurel Wilt, the end result of a fungal attack on trees in the Laurel family (primarily the genus Persea). Here at Myakka, we have two members of that genus—the Red Bay (Persea borbonia) and the Swamp Bay (Persea palustris). There is an example of a healthy Red Bay growing in the butterfly garden near the bathrooms at the Ranger Station. The avocado (Persea americana) seems to be slightly more resistant to Laurel Wilt, although the threat to this crop remains significant. Farmers are understandably concerned, and scientists are working against the clock to protect this food source. The avocado is not native to Florida; it was intentionally introduced from tropical America. Laurel Wilt was also introduced, accidentally, from Asia. It is a fungus spread via the Asian Ambrosia Beetle. This particular fungus disrupts a tree’s sap flow, quickly shutting it down. My records estimate that about 90% of laurels in Myakka have fallen victim to Laurel Wilt. I’ve seen a bit of resprouting from old root systems, but a second wave of Laurel Wilt is systematically destroying these, too. To the casual observer, the loss of the park’s bay trees probably goes unnoticed.