DOCSLIB.ORG

Zig Zag Quarry Restoration. Hydrogeological Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zig Zag Quarry Restoration. Hydrogeological Risk Assessment ZIG ZAG QUARRY RESTORATION. HYDROGEOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT. HARLEYFORD AGGREGATES May 2020 UK Company Registration Number: 08610467 +44 (0) 7765 255 197 Registered Office: 23 Westfield Park, Redland, Bristol BS6 6LT www.jhgroundwater.co.uk Zig Zag Quarry HRA Harleyford Aggregates REVISION Record Revision 0 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Project Number 1164 1164 File reference 1164/001_r1_Rev0 1164/001_r1_Rev1 Description of Working Draft Final Revision Prepared by Julian Hatherall Julian Hatherall Revision date 16/10/19 28/05/20 Copyright. All copyright in this document is reserved. Disclaimer. This report has been prepared by JH Groundwater Ltd in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the geological and engineering professions practising at this time, within the agreed scope and terms of contract, and taking account of the manpower and resources devoted to it by agreement with its client. This document contains data, information and may contain conclusions and recommendations. The conditions described in this report are based on data available at the time, however, environmental and other conditions, including regulatory requirements may change with time and as other data and/or information becomes available. Data is limited in a number of cases and all potential constraints and liabilities associated with the site may not necessarily have been revealed. Potential exists for variations in soil and groundwater conditions between and beyond specific locations discussed in the report. The risk of undiscovered environmental impairment of the property cannot be ruled out. JH Groundwater Ltd cannot therefore warrant the actual conditions at the site and advice given is limited to those conditions for which information is held by JH Groundwater Ltd at the time. The findings and opinions presented in the report are based on information from a variety of sources and reasonable effort has been made to ensure that the information is accurate, that the opinions expressed are sound and the conclusions are based on appropriate implementation of the proposals. However, JH Groundwater Ltd cannot be made liable for any errors or omissions or for any losses or consequential losses resulting from decisions based on the information. The advice and opinions in this report should be read and relied on only in the context of the report as a whole along with any accompanying covering letter, e-mail or note. This report is provided only to the client with whom a contract has been agreed. Should the client wish to release this report to any other third party for that party’s reliance, JH Groundwater Ltd accepts no responsibility to any third party to whom this report or any part thereof is made known. JH Groundwater Ltd accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred as a result, and the third party does not acquire any rights whatsoever, contractual or otherwise, against JH Groundwater Ltd except as expressly agreed with JH Groundwater Ltd in writing. Zig Zag Quarry HRA Harleyford Aggregates Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives and Scope of Works .................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 About the Author ........................................................................................................................................ 2 2 Site Characterisation 3 2.1 Development Summary .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Geology ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Surface Water ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.5 Hydrogeology .............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.6 Water Resources, Licensed Abstractions and Private Water Supplies ..................................................... 11 2.7 Conservation Interests .............................................................................................................................. 12 2.8 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................................... 13 3 Geological and Hydrogeological Conceptual Model 14 4 Hydrogeological Risk Assessment 16 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Overview of Proposals .............................................................................................................................. 16 4.3 Source, Pathway, Receptor ....................................................................................................................... 17 4.4 Risk Assessment ........................................................................................................................................ 18 4.5 Review of Technical Precautions .............................................................................................................. 19 5 Requisite Surveillance 20 5.1 Risk Based Monitoring Scheme ................................................................................................................ 20 5.2 Contingency Action Plan ........................................................................................................................... 21 6 Conclusions 22 Zig Zag Quarry HRA Harleyford Aggregates FIGURES APPENDICES Appendix 1 Waste Recovery Plan including the Restoration Plans Appendix 2 Envirocheck Report Appendix 3 Envirocheck Geological Mapping Zig Zag Quarry HRA Harleyford Aggregates 1 Introduction JH Groundwater Limited (JHG) were commissioned by Aardvark EM (AEM) to undertake a Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) for quarry restoration using indigenous waste mineral and imported inert waste materials at Zig Zag Quarry. These are currently operated by Harleyford Aggregates Ltd (Harleyford). This report describes the hydrogeological risk assessment carried out by JHG to assess if the proposals are likely to adversely impact controlled waters in the locality, and to support the environmental permit application for the restoration. Please note that whilst the assessment refers to restoration of the quarry, this includes both the quarry void and the silt ponds located to the north. The purpose of this document is to assess the proposals and whether there are any significant risks, from a controlled waters perspective, in this location. It is understood that additional risk assessment work may be requested at a later stage but that the assessment outlined here would be reviewed by the EA as a statutory consultee at pre-application stage to identify specific issues of concern and define the scope of risk assessment required. 1.1 Background Details of the planned restoration are provided in Appendix 1. However, to summarise, planning approval for the extension of the quarry and phased restoration was granted by Devon Council in October 2016. Specifically: x Harleyford plan to extract 500,000 tonnes of sand and gravel over a 10-year period. x The approved planning application states that the restoration will include the importation of 285,00 tonnes of inert waste over a five-year period and this will be undertaken in a phased approach as shown in Appendix 1. 1.2 Objectives and Scope of Works To identify potential risks to controlled waters resulting from the development proposals the following assessment has been completed: x Undertake a data review to establish the hydrogeological Conceptual Site Model (CSM) and complete a qualitative hydrogeological impact assessment. This includes: 1164_AEM_Zigzaq_Qualhra_Rev1.Docx Page 1 Zig Zag Quarry HRA Harleyford Aggregates o Definition of the local geological and hydrogeological conditions; o Definition of the development environmental setting; o An outline of engineering proposals; o Qualification of risks to identified receptors through completion of a proportional Hydrogeological Risk Assessment (HRA) to assess potential positive or adverse impacts on controlled waters that may arise from proposed development. x A site visit to review the environmental setting; and x Reporting in a succinct manner setting out the assessment, conclusions, recommendations and a discussion of likely risks and limitations. 1.3 About the Author This assessment has been completed by Julian Hatherall. Julian is a Chartered Geologist with over 22 years’ experience providing advice on groundwater and hydrogeological issues and has significant knowledge of the assessment and management of groundwater and water resources. His experience encompasses both contaminant and water resource hydrogeology and includes baseline groundwater studies, groundwater risk assessment, groundwater advice in relation to the development of infrastructure and buildings including drainage, groundwater in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Holnicote Multi-Objective Flood Management Demonstration Project
    Holnicote Multi-Objective Flood Management Demonstration Project An Analysis of the Impacts of Rural Land Management Change on Flooding and Flood Risk A Position Paper by Steve Rose and Zdenka Rosolova, JBA Consulting Rob Lamb, The JBA Trust Pete Worrall and Gene Hammond, Penny Anderson Associates Nigel Hester, National Trust Email: [email protected] Introduction Determining and predicting the influence and contribution that rural land management practices have on catchment scale flood risk management is a topic of national importance. The year 2000 was the wettest year in England and Wales for 270 years and the widespread flooding led to financial losses estimated at the time to be around £1 billion1. During the past decade flood events such as those at Boscastle (2004); Carlisle (2005); the summer floods of 2007 affecting a belt between Gloucestershire and Humberside costing Britain about £3.2 billion2 and Cockermouth (2009), have highlighted the significant social and economic costs associated with flooding incidents. These recent events have prompted greater interest in the role of surface water runoff from the rural environment and the inter- relationships between river channels and floodplains. The notion that through changing the way our rural land is managed would positively contribute to reducing flood risk is very attractive3 and a number of studies have been investigating this. However, it is still felt by key agencies, such as Defra and the Environment Agency, that insufficient quantitative evidence exists to provide the basis on which to shift resources and invest in land management change as a flood risk management measure (Parrott et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Flooding in West Somerset: Overview of Local Risks and Ideas for Action
    FLOODING IN WEST SOMERSET: OVERVIEW OF LOCAL RISKS AND IDEAS FOR ACTION A discussion document by the West Somerset Flood Group June 2014 The West Somerset Flood Group WHO WE ARE We are a group of town and parish councils (and one flood group) actively working to reduce flood risk at local level. We have come together because we believe that the communities of West Somerset should have a voice in the current debate on managing future flood risk. We also see a benefit in providing a local forum for discussion and hope to include experts, local- authority officers and local landowners in our future activities. We are not experts on statutory duties, powers and funding, on the workings of local and national government or on climate change. We do, however, know a lot about the practicalities of working to protect our communities, we talk to both local people and experts, and we are aware of areas where current structures of responsibility and funding may not be working smoothly. We also have ideas for future action against flooding. We are directly helped in our work by the Environment Agency, Somerset County Council (Flood and Water Management team, Highways Department and Civil Contingencies Unit), West Somerset Council, Exmoor National Park Authority and the National Trust and are grateful for the support they give us. We also thank our County and District Councillors for listening to us and providing support and advice. Members: River Aller and Horner Water Community Flood Group, Dulverton TC, Minehead TC, Monksilver PC, Nettlecombe PC, Old Cleeve PC, Porlock PC, Stogursey PC, Williton PC For information please contact: Dr T Bridgeman, Rose Villa, Roadwater, Watchet, TA23 0QY, 01984 640996 [email protected] Front cover photograph: debris against Dulverton bridge over the River Barle (December 23 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Gatekeeper Wheel of Life Project Newsletter 2017-2019
    GATEKEEPER WHEEL OF LIFE PROJECT NEWSLETTER York City: the Minster Chapter House ceiling and guardian trees of the Rivers Ouse and Fosse. 2017-2019 GATEKEEPER TRUST WHEEL OF LIFE PROJECT OVERVIEW NEWSLETTER, 2017-2019 The Wheel of Life project grew out of the work of Susie Straw and Clare Higson, who created an annual programme (ELSD - Encircling the Land with Sacred Dance) of circle dancing and pilgrimage round Britain. In 2016 the trust was asked to re-new the original vision of ‘turning the wheel’ of the British landscape, through local group events, facilitated through a core group who began the Gatekeeper Wheel of Life Project programme in 2017. Since then, local areas have been explored, their symbology explored within cities and sanctuaries responding with our hearts to the spirit of love within the landscape, following the times of the full moon. Encircling the Land with Sacred Dance, Ely Cathedral, with Susie Straw. This newsletter presents a theme design rather than a chronological report, weaving the local groups’ short reflections, photos, poetry and graphics which seek to interpret the cyclic nature of life within ourselves and in Nature as our mirror and teacher. It is the story of a dedicated group of people seeking to answer the spirit of the land with creative activities and pilgrimage. To complete our holistic overview, at the end you will find maps, designs for interpreting the ancient concept of the ‘wheel of life; and links to some links to previous research into landscape zodiacs, and where to find them. It is hoped that together we can develop our understanding of how temples and earth structures were used for ritual and culture building purposes, and what they might mean to us today as models of transformation, vision and harmonic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brazen Nose
    The Brazen Nose Volume 52 2017-2018 The Brazen Nose 2017–2018 Printed by: The Holywell Press Limited, www.holywellpress.com CONTENTS Records Articles Editor’s Notes ..................................5 Professor Nicholas Kurti: Senior Members ...............................8 An Appreciaton by John Bowers QC, Class Lists .......................................18 Principal ..........................................88 Graduate Degrees...........................23 E S Radcliffe 1798 by Matriculations ................................28 Dr Llewelyn Morgan .........................91 College Prizes ................................32 The Greenland Library Opening Elections to Scholarships and Speech by Philip Pullman .................95 Exhibitions.....................................36 The Greenland Library Opening College Blues .................................42 Speech by John Bowers QC, Principal ..........................................98 Reports BNC Sixty-Five Years On JCR Report ...................................44 by Dr Carole Bourne-Taylor ............100 HCR Report .................................46 A Response to John Weeks’ Careers Report ..............................51 Fifty Years Ago in Vol. 51 Library and Archives Report .........52 by Brian Cook ...............................101 Presentations to the Library ...........56 Memories of BNC by Brian Judd 3...10 Chapel Report ...............................60 Paper Cuts: A Memoir by Music Report .................................64 Stephen Bernard: A Review The King’s Hall Trust for
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1
    West Somerset Council & Exmoor National Park Authority Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 Final Report March 2009 Prepared for: West Somerset Council and Exmoor National Park Authority Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Revision Schedule Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment March 2009 Project Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by Number 01 January D122558 Draft Level 1 Mark Crussell Dr Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2009 SFRA Assistant Hydrologist Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Dr Rob Sweet Specialist Senior Flood Risk Specialist 02 March D122558 Final Level 1 Dr Rob Sweet Dr Rob Sweet Jon Robinson 2009 SFRA – Senior Flood Risk Senior Flood Risk Associate Director Incorporating Specialist Specialist ENPA, WSC and EA comments Scott Wilson Mayflower House Armada Way This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed Plymouth to and for the sole use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wils on accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes, PL1 1LD stated in the document, for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the conte nts of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, Tel 01752 676733 opinions, or recommendations within this document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Environment Agency Plan
    local environment agency plan WEST SOMERSET RIVERS CONSULTATION REPORT FEBRUARY 1998 BRISTOL BRIDGWATER DISPLAY COPY PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE En v ir o n m e n t H A g e n c y National Information Centre The Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive Aztec West BRISTOL BSI2 4UD Due for return l.fe Foreword This Local Environment Agency Plan (LEAP) Consultation Report represents a significant step forward in tackling environmental issues. It has been clear for many years that the problems of land, air and water, particularly in the realm of pollution control, cannot be adequately addressed individually. They are interdependent, each affecting the others. The creation of the Environment Agency with the responsibilities for all three media provided a major opportunity to take an holistic approach which is now reflected in this LEAP Consultation Report. The Plan area includes significant parts of Exmoor National Park and the Quantocks Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty which are nationally prized for their, exceptional wild beauty. It also includes the major seaside resort of Minehead together with other tourist centres such as Poiiock, Watchet and Dunster which support a developing tourist industry. Here in West Somerset, we must be ever vigilant to protect our local environment from the growing pressures of tourism and development whilst recognising their importance in the local economy. The environmental challenges of the area are set out in the Plan in a way which has not been done before, raising important environmental issues which should now be addressed. It is, I believe, vital reading for everyone concerned with the environmental future of North Wessex.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1 There Is One Gauging Station in This Catchment, at West Luccombe on the Horner Water
    ' N ' t A foo-Tv^ vo&rT /Q H C . M FISHERY SURVEY OF THE HORNER WATER CATCHMENT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This fishery survey of the Homer Water catchment was started in September 1992 but wet weather prevented its conclusion. The survey was resumed and completed in September 1993. The watercourses surveyed were the Homer Water itself and its tributaries East Water and the River Aller. 1.2 The majority of the catchment is owned by the National Trust. 2. TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY 2.1 The Homer Water and East Water rise on the slopes of Dunkery Beacon, which at 519 metres AOD is the highest point of Exmoor. The river falls steeply all the way to the sea at Porlock Bay. Most of the year the water percolates through the shingle ridge but at times of very high flow the volume of water is sufficient to blast a clear channel. 2.2 The River Aller is fed from several streams which arise on the lower slopes of Dunkery and hills to the east. Gradients are gentle when compared with those of the Homer Water. 2.3 Devonian Hangman grits outcrop extensively at the top of the catchment. Triassic mudstones and sandstones overlie the Devonian in places especially in the lower reaches and all the valleys have extensive alluvial gravel deposits. 2.4 The relationship between the various watercourses is shown on the map (Appendix 1). APPENDIX 1 3. WATER QUALITY 3.1 Chemical water quality is shown in Figure WQ1 for most of the FIGURE WQ1 Homer Water and the River Aller.
    [Show full text]
  • Allerford Conservation Area: Appraisal Document
    Exmoor National Park Historic Environment Report Series No 9 ALLERFORD CONSERVATION AREA: APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Adopted March 2017 ALLERFORD CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Contents Summary of Significance 1 1. Introduction 2 1.1 Planning Framework 2 1.2 Development in a Conservation Area 2 1.3 Preparation and Survey Limitations 3 1.4 Community Involvement 3 2. Topographic and Historic Background 4 2.1 Location and Lanscape Setting 4 2.2 Historic Development and Archaeology 4 2.2.1 Medieval Development 4 2.2.2 Post Medieval Development 5 2.3 Archaeology 6 2.4 Economic and Social Profile 7 3. Spatial Analysis 8 3.1 Settlement Pattern and Building Density 8 3.1.1 Allerford 8 3.1.2 Higher Allerford 9 3.1.3 Lower Allerford 10 3.2 Plan-form, Height and Massing 10 3.3 Green Space 11 3.4 Views 12 EXMOOR NATIONAL PARK 4. Architectural Quality and Built Form 14 4.1 Architectural Style 14 4.1.1 Allerford 15 4.1.2 Higher Allerford 27 4.1.3 Lower Allerford 29 4.2 Materials 31 4.2.1 Walls 31 4.2.2 Roofs 32 4.2.3 Windows and Doors 33 5. Street Scene 35 5.1 Boundaries 35 5.2 Groundscape 37 5.3 Street Furniture 37 5.4 Bridges 39 5.5 Landscape and Trees 40 6. Condition Assessment 42 6.1 Current Condition 42 6.2 Vulnerability 46 7. Recommendations 50 7.1 Boundary Changes 50 7.2 Management and Enhancement 50 7.2.1 Building in the Conservation Area 50 7.2.2 Features 51 7.2.3 Historic Setting and Landscape 51 7.2.4 Use of Traditional Materials 52 ALLERFORD CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Appendix A Conservation Areas General Guidance 53 Appendix B Listed Buildings 54 Appendix C Locally Important Unlisted Buildings 56 Appendix D Bibliography 57 Appendix E Map 1 Allerford Conservation Boundary 58 Map 2 Allerford Character Appraisal 59 EXMOOR NATIONAL PARK ALLERFORD CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Summary of Significance Allerford and the surrounding countryside is part of the Holnicote Estate, formerly the Exmoor seat of the Acland Family and since 1944 owned by the National Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • What Will Somerset Rivers Authority (SRA) Do with Its Council Tax and Other Local Funding for 2021-22?
    Somerset Rivers Authority Enhanced Programme 2021-22 What will Somerset Rivers Authority (SRA) do with its council tax and other local funding for 2021-22? Where the SRA’s local funding comes from For 2021-22, Somerset Rivers Authority (SRA) will get £2,921,586 from Somerset council tax, and £20,000 contributed by the Axe Brue and Parrett Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs). That means the SRA’s total local funding for this year is £2,941,586. A share of council tax is levied for the SRA by Somerset County Council and the four district councils: Mendip, Sedgemoor, Somerset West and Taunton, and South Somerset. The SRA’s council tax charge has not increased since 2016, when it was introduced. What the SRA’s local funding is spent on Projects and activities Just over 90.4% (that is, £2,659,586) of the SRA’s local funding for 2021-22 will be spent on 21 different projects and activities across Somerset. These are all listed and described down below. See Contents – Quick Links. SRA activities stretch across the county from Dulverton in the west to Beckington in the east. Because different parts of the county have different needs, and it makes sense to approach different challenges from different angles, SRA activities lead to hundreds of improvements of different kinds. Not all activities are expected to be completed within one year. All works are part of what is called the SRA’s Enhanced Programme. This gives Somerset extra flood protection and greater local resilience, in line with the objectives of Somerset’s 20 Year Flood Action Plan, drawn up during the devastating floods of 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Flood Multi-Agency Response Plan
    Somerset Flood Multi-agency Response Plan Somerset Local Authorities Civil Contingencies Unit PPBG, County Hall The Crescent TAUNTON TA1 4DY Freedom of Information Act 2000 Open Status Security Classification Not Protectively Marked Version 1.2 Date Oct 2012 amended Dec 2014 0 Notification Chain Environment Agency Calls FASTCON Multi-agency. During working hours Borough or District Councils informed and invited to participate. SLACCU Duty CCO represents all LA’s out of working hours and will inform Duty Director of Public Health Police identify SILVER (TCG) Location On completion of FASTCON, Duty CCO will inform internal departments and external authorities and agencies (as required) of actions required. Evacuation and Rest Centre plans activated as necessary Recovery Plans Activated, 1 Summary of Emergency Response Stages Pre-incident Severe In working hours, Out of working Weather and Flood information hours Duty CCO Alerts and Warnings passed to other follows departments and procedures in SI authorities. Lead Officers identified. Risk of Flooding EA initiate Duty CCO identified by EA FASTCON checks DPH aware and District Councils Co-ordination of the Police Lead Multi-agency response Identification of Critical Emergency Out of hours Infrastructure and Services, LAs, contact through Vulnerable Groups Utilities Social Care Duty Team for Care Homes etc. Command and Control OPLINK Police or Partner Discussions Establish the Police TCG Establish the Police SCG Emergency As required by Centres LAs Warning the Public Met Office
    [Show full text]
  • 399 13 SD07 Green One Column Template
    Read me before you start (and then delete me) Before you start, make sure you save this document in the latest version of Word (.docx format). If you don’t Case study 3 do this, you will have problems with formatting your document correctly. Holnicote demonstration project - Somerset Audience first Make sure you have thought about who your document is for. Write in plain English and stick to language your audience will understand. See our style and writing guidance. Make sure you include the correct classification in the footer of your document. Styles Our templates are based on styles, which are pre-set formats for fonts, graphs, colours and so on. Pretty much everything you do in Word has its own style. Once you get the hang of using styles, it’s easy to go through your document apply the correct ones. If you need help understanding our house style, see 'What is visual design?' How to use styles The styles take seconds to set up, so don’t be put off! In the View tab at the top of your screen, set the document to print layout. Open the Styles toolbar: in the Home tab, click on the arrow in the bottom right-hand corner of the styles section, underneath ‘Change Styles’ (or use Alt+Control+Shift+s). The toolbar will appear on the right of your screen. Make sure you tick the ‘Show Preview’ box at the bottom of the list so you can see what the styles look like. If you skip this step, you will find that applying the document styles is harder than it needs to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Sra Partners Work to Reduce Somerset Flood Risks
    SRA PARTNERS WORK TO REDUCE SOMERSET FLOOD RISKS Somerset Rivers Authority is to spend £3.44 million on 21 projects giving Somerset residents greater flood protection and resilience. Towns, villages and rural river catchments across Somerset, from Dulverton in the west to Beckington in the east, will benefit from the SRA’s 2021-22 Enhanced Programme of works. The programme includes new investments in major schemes to reduce flood risks from rivers, reinforced by a significant number of measures to help slow the flow of water down through catchments. SRA partners will also tackle road flooding problems, develop urban action plans and support local communities and businesses The money comes from three sources: • £2.66 million of the 2021-22 council tax raised for the SRA by Somerset County Council and Mendip, Sedgemoor, Somerset West and Taunton, and South Somerset district councils: • £20,000 contributed by the Axe Brue and Parrett Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs); • and £780,000 moved especially from the SRA’s contingency fund to allow more projects to proceed. The SRA’s share of the council tax charge has not increased since 2016, when it was introduced. The SRA’s local funding has so far enabled Somerset to benefit from an extra 199 schemes and activities designed to reduce the severity and impact of all types of flooding. Cllr David Hall, Chair of Somerset Rivers Authority, said: “Different parts of Somerset have different challenges with flooding, so we need to tackle those challenges in appropriate ways, and bring people together to achieve the best results. “Our new Enhanced Programme gets more partners than ever before working together on a range of SRA-funded activities.
    [Show full text]