The Strange History of a Flamen Dialis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Strange History of a Flamen Dialis The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here The Strange History of a Flamen Dialis W. W. Fowler The Classical Review / Volume 7 / Issue 05 / May 1893, pp 193 - 195 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00197501, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00197501 How to cite this article: W. W. Fowler (1893). The Strange History of a Flamen Dialis. The Classical Review, 7, pp 193-195 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00197501 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 138.251.14.35 on 25 Apr 2015 The Classical Review MAY 1893. THE STRANGE HISTORY OF A FLAMEN DIALIS. (NOTE ON Ltvv XXVII. 8.) THIS chapter of Livy has been frequently After briefly narrating the first election quoted in connexion with the Curio Maximus of a plebeian to the oflice of Curio Maximus, as well as with the Flamen Dialis : but both Livy goes on to tell us that at this same historians and antiquarians seem to have let time, at the beginning of 209 B.C., a young another matter of real interest escape their man, 0. Valerius Flaccus by name, was notice. This is a singular bit of family compelled by the Pontifex Maximus against history, which seems to me to deserve his will to be inaugurated as Flamen Dialis. attention as illustrating the Roman life The inauguratio was the final ceremony in and manners of the age as well as the the process of appointment, and it was here decay of a once important Roman priest- apparently that the unwilling youth made hood. some kind of struggle to escape. He had Livy here interrupts his narrative of the been previously ' captus a pontifice maximo,' war with Hannibal, before proceeding to the i.e. selected out of a certain number of events which led to the battle of the persons nominated (Tac. Ann. iv. 16), and Metaurus, to record one or two events of brought by a kind of mancipatio under the minor importance which might very well potestas of the Pontifex. The coercive power in the Augustan age have had a real interest of the head of the Roman religion,—a power for some of his readers, including, as we which at one time must have belonged to the may conjecture, Augustus himself. His Rex,—is now brought to bear on the reluctant information came no doubt, directly or one to compel him to be inaugurated. indirectly, from the books of the pontifices, One can understand that a young man and may be taken as representing the facts may have been unwilling to fill a priesthood accurately so far as the priesthoods are which brought him no political advantages, concerned. It may indeed have been and in fact placed him under many disabili- supplemented from the work of Valerius ties which in our eyes at least are highly Antias, as the family prominent in the story ludicrous; but it it not so easy to see why is that of the Valerii Flacci ; but Livy had by he should have been forced into it against this time learnt to distrust Antias, and the his will. Livy however supplies us with the singularity of the story itself and the fact explanation, and a most extraordinary one that it is not entirely to the credit of that it is ; so strange in fact that he says he eminent family lead me to think it in any would have preferred to suppress it,' ni ex case worthy of belief. And, as we shall see, mala fama in bonam vertisset' ; words in it is incidentally confirmed by subsequent which we may perhaps see a kind of apology events which cannot be called in question. to Augustus for mentioning a circumstance NO. LX. VOL. VII. 194 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. which would naturally give pain to that rigid possible that this priesthood had already moralist, now engaged in resuscitating this been used for the same purpose ; for Livy a as well as other ancient sacrificial priesthoods. few lines further on mentions the fact that This young man was selected by the Pontifex the ' indignitas' of recent flamines had on account of Ids loose life,—' ob adule- deprived them of the privilege of attending scentiam negligentem luxuriosamque.' meetings of the senate, which had formerly This is sufficiently puzzling ; but fortu- attached to the office. And here one natur- nately Livy adds a few words which seem to ally thinks of the story told by Velleius and me to let us into the whole secret, words of Suetonius, that Julius Caesar when very which no one seems to have caught the full young was destined by his friends to be meaning. At the end of the sentence we Flamen Dialis, which would chime in well are told the youth was ' L. Flacco fratri enough with a certain saying of Sulla's germano cognatisque aliis ob eadem vitia about him, if we were to explain it in the invisus.' In other words, he was the black same way in which Livy explains the fate of sheep of a great Roman family of the best Flaccus. On the other hand, it may be that type; for this brother was no less a person the rigid rules for the life of the Flamen had than the friend and discoverer of M. Porcius by that time become so much relaxed as to Cato, who afterwards had that still more destroy its monastic character. It was eminent man as his colleague in both con- certainly at that time possible to hold it sulship and censorship.1 It was a disgrace together with a magistracy.4 to such a family that at a time of great This strange story shows that there was public peril and anxiety any of its members no necessary connexion between religious should be indulging in idle and luxurious office at Rome and a good or decent life, at habits, even if there were nothing worse to the time of the Hannibalic war. But the be laid to his charge. Clearly he was not sequel, which is almost as strange, also fit for a public career, and must be prevented seems to show that the religio of the from embarking on it. His elder brother Romans might not be without its influence therefore and the rest of the family con- on life even at so late a date as this. Livy spired to shut him away in the monastic life goes on to say that this young reprobate, of the Flamen Dialis, where he could not when once his mind came to be occupied very well do any harm, and might conceiv- with the ' cura sacrorum et caerimoniarum,' ably come to some good. speedily became repentant. He put off his The extraordinary series of taboos which former evil ways, and took a leading place were placed upon the holder of this priest- for virtue among the youth of his day, being hood are familiar to scholars, and I need not highly approved of by the weightiest men detail them here: the more so as Mr. Frazer in the Senate,—and not only by those of has done full justice to them in Tlie Golden his own kin. Encouraged by the confidence Bough, while explaining their original placed in him, he even ventured to claim object and meaning.2 One restriction how- the old privilege of admission to the Senate. ever he has not mentioned, which is of im- Here however he met with a rebuff: the portance to us in trying to understand this presiding Praetor (the consuls being ap- strange case of Flaccus. The Flamen Dialis parently outside the city with their troops) was not allowed to leave his house for a single turned him out of the Curia. With a com- night during the year.3 He was so precious mon sense worthy of a Roman and a praetor, a personage, in early times at least, that he yet a little surprising in those days, he had to be most carefully guarded and looked argued ' non exoletis vetustate exemplis after; and when as time went on the real stare ius' ; words from which we may infer meaning of all his disabilities had vanished, that the priesthood had even then long begun the outwaid forms of them survived and to sink into insignificance. Flaccus at once made the post a very uncomfortable one to called on the Tribunes to support him, and hold. For further explanations I must here the Tribunate accurately represents the refer the curious to Mr. Frazer ; but I have popular feeling of what was due to so signal said enough to show why Flaccus was dis- an example of repentaJfej. Amid the posed to kick, and why his family were so applause of Senate and people they brought anxious to circumvent him. It is not im- him back to the Senate-house, and the 1 Praetor himself offered no further opposi- This is proved by Livy xxxi. 49 and 50 ; cf. tion. xxxiii. 42. - Golden Hough, vol. i. cli. 2, section 1. 3 We are able to trace the history of this Livy v. 52, 13. Even after Augustus' revival, 4 the restriction was almost as severe ; Tac. Ann. iii. Caesar's predecessor in the priesthood, Morula, 71. had been also consul; see Drmnann, iii. 130. THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. 195 man for a quarter of a century after the of his age may for a time have partially events recorded in this chapter.
Recommended publications
  • Vestal Virgins and Their Families
    Vestal Virgins and Their Families Andrew B. Gallia* I. INTRODUCTION There is perhaps no more shining example of the extent to which the field of Roman studies has been enriched by a renewed engagement with anthropology and other cognate disciplines than the efflorescence of interest in the Vestal virgins that has followed Mary Beard’s path-breaking article regarding these priestesses’ “sexual status.”1 No longer content to treat the privileges and ritual obligations of this priesthood as the vestiges of some original position (whether as wives or daughters) in the household of the early Roman kings, scholars now interrogate these features as part of the broader frameworks of social and cultural meaning through which Roman concepts of family, * Published in Classical Antiquity 34.1 (2015). Early versions of this article were inflicted upon audiences in Berkeley and Minneapolis. I wish to thank the participants of those colloquia for helpful and judicious feedback, especially Ruth Karras, Darcy Krasne, Carlos Noreña, J. B. Shank, and Barbara Welke. I am also indebted to George Sheets, who read a penultimate draft, and to Alain Gowing and the anonymous readers for CA, who prompted additional improvements. None of the above should be held accountable for the views expressed or any errors that remain. 1 Beard 1980, cited approvingly by, e.g., Hopkins 1983: 18, Hallett 1984: x, Brown 1988: 8, Schultz 2012: 122. Critiques: Gardner 1986: 24-25, Beard 1995. 1 gender, and religion were produced.2 This shift, from a quasi-diachronic perspective, which seeks explanations for recorded phenomena in the conditions of an imagined past, to a more synchronic approach, in which contemporary contexts are emphasized, represents a welcome methodological advance.
    [Show full text]
  • Magic in Private and Public Lives of the Ancient Romans
    COLLECTANEA PHILOLOGICA XXIII, 2020: 53–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-0319.23.04 Idaliana KACZOR Uniwersytet Łódzki MAGIC IN PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LIVES OF THE ANCIENT ROMANS The Romans practiced magic in their private and public life. Besides magical practices against the property and lives of people, the Romans also used generally known and used protective and healing magic. Sometimes magical practices were used in official religious ceremonies for the safety of the civil and sacral community of the Romans. Keywords: ancient magic practice, homeopathic magic, black magic, ancient Roman religion, Roman religious festivals MAGIE IM PRIVATEN UND ÖFFENTLICHEN LEBEN DER ALTEN RÖMER Die Römer praktizierten Magie in ihrem privaten und öffentlichen Leben. Neben magische Praktik- en gegen das Eigentum und das Leben von Menschen, verwendeten die Römer auch allgemein bekannte und verwendete Schutz- und Heilmagie. Manchmal wurden magische Praktiken in offiziellen religiösen Zeremonien zur Sicherheit der bürgerlichen und sakralen Gemeinschaft der Römer angewendet. Schlüsselwörter: alte magische Praxis, homöopathische Magie, schwarze Magie, alte römi- sche Religion, Römische religiöse Feste Magic, despite our sustained efforts at defining this term, remains a slippery and obscure concept. It is uncertain how magic has been understood and practised in differ- ent cultural contexts and what the difference is (if any) between magical and religious praxis. Similarly, no satisfactory and all-encompassing definition of ‘magic’ exists. It appears that no singular concept of ‘magic’ has ever existed: instead, this polyvalent notion emerged at the crossroads of local custom, religious praxis, superstition, and politics of the day. Individual scholars of magic, positioning themselves as ostensi- bly objective observers (an etic perspective), mostly defined magic in opposition to religion and overemphasised intercultural parallels over differences1.
    [Show full text]
  • PÉROTIN and the ARS ANTIQUA the Hilliard Ensemble
    CORO hilliard live CORO hilliard live 1 The Hilliard Ensemble For more than three decades now The Hilliard Ensemble has been active in the realms of both early and contemporary music. As well as recording and performing music by composers such as Pérotin, Dufay, Josquin and Bach the ensemble has been involved in the creation of a large number of new works. James PÉROTIN MacMillan, Heinz Holliger, Arvo Pärt, Steven Hartke and many other composers have written both large and the and small-scale pieces for them. The ensemble’s performances ARS frequently include collaborations with other musicians such as the saxophonist Jan Garbarek, violinist ANTIQUA Christoph Poppen, violist Kim Kashkashian and orchestras including the New York Philharmonic, the BBC Symphony Orchestra and the Philadelphia Orchestra. John Potter’s contribution was crucial to getting the Hilliard Live project under way. John has since left to take up a post in the Music Department of York University. His place in the group has been filled by Steven Harrold. www.hilliardensemble.demon.co.uk the hilliard ensemble To find out more about CORO and to buy CDs, visit www.thesixteen.com cor16046 The hilliard live series of recordings came about for various reasons. 1 Vetus abit littera Anon. (C13th) 3:47 At the time self-published recordings were a fairly new and increasingly David James Rogers Covey-Crump John Potter Gordon Jones common phenomenon in popular music and we were keen to see if 2 Deus misertus hominis Anon. (C13th) 5:00 we could make the process work for us in the context of a series of David James Rogers Covey-Crump John Potter Gordon Jones public concerts.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Religion
    4 Roman Religion 1. “By pietas and fides the Romans Reached TheiR PResent eminence” the strength of Rome rested on a number of foundations. Among these were its extraordinarily vital political culture and its capacity to sustain warfare for extended periods of time. Previous chapters have emphasized these features, but in this chapter and the next, focus shifts to less obvious sources of Rome’s strength, namely the special character of its society whose dual foundations were the household and the civic religion of the city. Roman Religiosity during the period of the Republic, outsiders were struck by the religiosity of the Romans. In the second century b.c., Polybius, a Greek statesman and historian who lived much of his adult life in Rome, claimed that it was “scrupulous fear of the gods that kept the Roman commonwealth together” (6.56). A century or so later another expatriate Greek, Dionysius of Halicarnassus, was also impressed by the concern of Romans for religion. Writing about the second king of Rome, dionysius noted that as a result of Numa’s activities, Rome possessed more religious observances than any other city “Greek or non-Greek, even among those who thought of themselves as most god- fearing” (2.63). Needless to say, Romans themselves promoted the belief that fidelity to their oaths and treaties and their general reverence for the gods explained their imperial success. “the gods look kindly on these qualities, for it was by pietas and fides that Romans reached their present eminence” declared the consul Q. Marcius Philippus in 169 b.c.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury (Mythology) 1 Mercury (Mythology)
    Mercury (mythology) 1 Mercury (mythology) Silver statuette of Mercury, a Berthouville treasure. Ancient Roman religion Practices and beliefs Imperial cult · festivals · ludi mystery religions · funerals temples · auspice · sacrifice votum · libation · lectisternium Priesthoods College of Pontiffs · Augur Vestal Virgins · Flamen · Fetial Epulones · Arval Brethren Quindecimviri sacris faciundis Dii Consentes Jupiter · Juno · Neptune · Minerva Mars · Venus · Apollo · Diana Vulcan · Vesta · Mercury · Ceres Mercury (mythology) 2 Other deities Janus · Quirinus · Saturn · Hercules · Faunus · Priapus Liber · Bona Dea · Ops Chthonic deities: Proserpina · Dis Pater · Orcus · Di Manes Domestic and local deities: Lares · Di Penates · Genius Hellenistic deities: Sol Invictus · Magna Mater · Isis · Mithras Deified emperors: Divus Julius · Divus Augustus See also List of Roman deities Related topics Roman mythology Glossary of ancient Roman religion Religion in ancient Greece Etruscan religion Gallo-Roman religion Decline of Hellenistic polytheism Mercury ( /ˈmɜrkjʉri/; Latin: Mercurius listen) was a messenger,[1] and a god of trade, the son of Maia Maiestas and Jupiter in Roman mythology. His name is related to the Latin word merx ("merchandise"; compare merchant, commerce, etc.), mercari (to trade), and merces (wages).[2] In his earliest forms, he appears to have been related to the Etruscan deity Turms, but most of his characteristics and mythology were borrowed from the analogous Greek deity, Hermes. Latin writers rewrote Hermes' myths and substituted his name with that of Mercury. However, there are at least two myths that involve Mercury that are Roman in origin. In Virgil's Aeneid, Mercury reminds Aeneas of his mission to found the city of Rome. In Ovid's Fasti, Mercury is assigned to escort the nymph Larunda to the underworld.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spear As the Symbol of Property and Power in Ancient Rome
    1216-2574 / USD 20.00 ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA © 2007 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 48, No 3, pp. 231–257 (2007) DOI: 10.1556/AJur.47.2007.3.2 TAMÁS NÓTÁRI* The Spear as the Symbol of Property and Power in Ancient Rome Abstract. In his well-known description of legis actio sacramento in rem, Gaius remarks that the rod was used in the procedure instead of the spear as the sign of lawful property since what the Romans considered truly their own was the goods taken from the enemy: ”Festuca autem utebantur quasi hastae loco, signo quodam iusti dominii; quod maxime sua esse credebant quae ex hostibus cepissent.” In harmony with Gaius’s view Verrius Festus states that the spear is the symbol, incarnation of supreme power: “Hasta summa armorum et imperii est.” Setting out from these two testimonia, in the present study we intend to examine the content of the hasta and the festuca as symbols of power to support the interpretation of the ritual of legis actio sacramento in rem as duellum sacrum. First, we shall give a brief account of the occurrences of the spear as the symbol of imperium, of subhastatio related thereto and the function of the supreme commander’s spear; also, we shall touch on the stick of augures and certain Greek prefigurations and parallels of the symbolic nature of the spear and the rod. (I.) After that, we shall make some statements concerning the spear of the god Mars and the Mars cult, and the relation of Quirinus and Quirites to the symbolism of the spear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome
    THE ARGEI: SEX, WAR, AND CRUCIFIXION IN ROME AND THE ANCIENT NEAR EAST Kristan Foust Ewin, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Christopher J. Fuhrmann, Major Professor Ken Johnson, Committee Member Walt Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Ewin, Kristan Foust. The Argei: Sex, War, and Crucifixion in Rome and the Ancient Near East. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 119 pp., 2 tables, 18 illustrations, bibliography, 150 titles. The purpose of the Roman Argei ceremony, during which the Vestal Virgins harvested made and paraded rush puppets only to throw them into the Tiber, is widely debated. Modern historians supply three main reasons for the purpose of the Argei: an agrarian act, a scapegoat, and finally as an offering averting deceased spirits or Lares. I suggest that the ceremony also related to war and the spectacle of displaying war casualties. I compare the ancient Near East and Rome and connect the element of war and husbandry and claim that the Argei paralleled the sacred marriage. In addition to an agricultural and purification rite, these rituals may have served as sympathetic magic for pre- and inter-war periods. As of yet, no author has proposed the Argei as a ceremony related to war. By looking at the Argei holistically I open the door for a new direction of inquiry on the Argei ceremony, fertility cults in the Near East and in Rome, and on the execution of war criminals.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 the God Liber and the Republican Notions of Libertas in the Late Roman Republic
    6 The god Liber and the Republican Notions of Libertas in the late Roman Republic I This essay focuses on the Roman god Liber and its relation with the notion of libertas in the first century BC. A very powerful, and prima facie convincing, explanation of this relation is, in the words of one of the most authoritative scholars in the field, that ‘by name and by nature, Liber is the god of freedom … Though many explanations were offered by ancient sources to account for his name, the simplest and most obvious was an ideological one: Liber a libertate. Political freedom, libertas, was the defining quality of the Roman Republic, achieved by the expulsion of Tarquin and under threat ever after,’ and which found its divinisation in Liber.1 a notable exception Raaflaub 2000 in Hansen birthday, 257. Il punto non e’ sbagliato, ma richiede revision. Non si tratat della political liberty di provocatio. However, when analysing the evidence at our disposal, it is possible to observe that Liber is conceived as enacting different forms of liberation: Liber frees the individual from worries and fears, frees the soul from the constraints of a mortal body, and frees the semen, both male and female, in sexual union.2 As Anthony Corbeill brilliantly put it, Liber was conceived as fulfilling the role of both the Realiser and the Liberator.3 Building on recent works that move away from a linear development of Liber in Rome as an Italic deity of subversive traits, gradually tamed in the third and second century BC through a process of Hellenisation, and considering
    [Show full text]
  • Vox Tua Nempe Mea Est. Dialogues with the Dead in Roman Funerary Commemoration
    This is a repository copy of Vox tua nempe mea est. Dialogues with the dead in Roman funerary commemoration. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/167118/ Article: Carroll, Maureen (2008) Vox tua nempe mea est. Dialogues with the dead in Roman funerary commemoration. Accordia Research Papers. pp. 37-80. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ ‘Vox tua nempe mea est’ Dialogues with the dead in Roman funerary commemoration Maureen Carroll I, who speak without a voice by means of the inscribed marble, was born in wonderful Tralles, travelled often from Asia via all the houses of Baiae for the hot springs and the joys of the sea. This honourable and unforgotten life of mine was commemorated with this monument by my heir with 50,000, according to my wishes, setting up the last temple to my Manes, for my ashes and for the obsequies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imperial Cult During the Reign of Domitian
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA Filosofická fakulta Katedra archeologie a muzeologie Klasická archeologie Bc. Barbora Chabrečková Cisársky kult v období vlády Domitiána Magisterská diplomová práca Vedúca práce: Mgr. Dagmar Vachůtová, Ph.D. Brno 2017 MASARYK UNIVERSITY Faculty of Arts Department of Archaeology and Museology Classical Archaeology Bc. Barbora Chabrečková The Imperial Cult During the Reign of Domitian Master's Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Mgr. Dagmar Vachůtová, Ph.D. Brno 2017 2 I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work, created with use of primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. ……………………………… Bc. Barbora Chabrečková In Brno, June 2017 3 Acknowledgement I would like to thank to my supervisor, Mgr. Dagmar Vachůtová, Ph.D., for her guidance and encouragement that she granted me throughout the entire creative process of this thesis, to my consulting advisor, Mgr. Ing. Monika Koróniová, who showed me the possibilities this topic has to offer, and to my friends and parents, for their care and support. 4 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 8 I) Definition, Origin, and Pre-Imperial History of the Imperial Cult ................................... 10 1.) Origin in the Private Cult & the Term Genius ........................................................... 10
    [Show full text]
  • Pietschmann, C. (2017); 'Imperial Priestesses
    Pietschmann, C. (2017); ‘Imperial Priestesses, Roman Models: Kinship Ties and Elite Identity in the Western Provinces’ Rosetta 21: 35 - 49 http://www.rosetta.bham.ac.uk/issue21/Pietschmann.pdf Imperial Priestesses, Roman Models: Kinship Ties and Elite Identity in the Western Provinces Constantin Pietschmann Introduction At the end of the second century CE, Nahania Victoria, flaminica perpetua of Thugga, donated 70,000 sesterces for the erection of a temple to Mercury. This included statues, porticoes, and a market, which was to be built adjacent to the temple and was dedicated to the wellbeing of the emperor.1 The donation, which she offered together with her husband, a flamen perpetuus, and augur of Carthage, constituted the fulfilment of their pollicitae summae, in addition to a sum ob honorem flamonii perpetui, offered on top of the required amount;2 this was further increased by an additional 50,000 sesterces left behind by their son. This generous donation, offered pago patr[i]ae, was primarily meant to benefit the community through the modification of the urban religious and commercial landscape, but was further qualified by her husband’s separate donation of 25,000 sesterces to provide sportulae and games to the decuriones and the entire population. The image presented by Nahania Victoria, a woman of local origin, whose public munificence not only transformed the topography of her home town, but, through the office of her husband, also linked it explicitly to the administrative centre at Carthage, was one of wife, mother, and benefactress.3 Moreover, she was a public figure, a priestess of the imperial cult, whose embeddedness within the civic framework of her pagus was put prominently on display, alongside that of her immediate family.
    [Show full text]