DOCSLIB.ORG

2019-2023 Antnz IEE Amendment 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019-2023 Antnz IEE Amendment 1 Initial Environmental Evaluation Scott Base and field support operations 2019-2023 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. National requirements ........................................................................................................... 2 1.2. Four-year outlook .................................................................................................................. 3 1.3. Scope .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Knowledge gaps ................................................................................................................... 4 2. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1. Historic context ..................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Antarctica New Zealand ........................................................................................................ 5 2.3. Science Platform ................................................................................................................... 6 2.4. Long-term science ................................................................................................................ 7 3. Location ........................................................................................................................................ 8 4. Duration ...................................................................................................................................... 13 5. Nature and intensity of Scott Base and field support operation ................................................. 14 5.1. Power generation ................................................................................................................ 15 5.2. Hazardous substances storage and use ............................................................................ 16 5.2.1. Fuel ............................................................................................................................. 16 5.2.2. Other chemicals .......................................................................................................... 16 5.3. Waste .................................................................................................................................. 17 5.3.1. Wastewater ................................................................................................................. 18 5.4. Maintenance activities ........................................................................................................ 18 5.4.1. Minor earthworks ........................................................................................................ 18 5.4.2. Water intake and outfall structure replacement .......................................................... 19 5.4.3. Satellite dome replacement ........................................................................................ 19 5.4.4. Water tank replacement .............................................................................................. 19 5.4.5. Unforeseen maintenance ............................................................................................ 19 5.5. Transport ............................................................................................................................. 19 5.5.1. Intercontinental aircraft ............................................................................................... 19 5.5.2. Shipping ...................................................................................................................... 20 5.5.3. Surface transport ........................................................................................................ 21 5.5.4. Intracontinental flights ................................................................................................. 23 5.5.5. Penguin census .......................................................................................................... 24 5.5.6. Drones and Remotely Operated Vehicles .................................................................. 26 5.6. Field support ....................................................................................................................... 26 5.6.1. Camp equipment and set up ....................................................................................... 26 5.6.2. Installations ................................................................................................................. 27 5.6.3. Field fuels .................................................................................................................... 29 5.6.4. Search and Rescue training ........................................................................................ 31 5.7. Recreation and familiarisation ............................................................................................ 31 5.7.1. Observation and familiarisation................................................................................... 32 5.7.2. Independent recreation ............................................................................................... 32 5.7.3. Organised activities ..................................................................................................... 32 5.7.4. Winter recreation ......................................................................................................... 32 5.8. Community Engagement Programme ................................................................................ 34 5.9. Invited Visitors..................................................................................................................... 34 5.10. Management of Antarctic Specially Protected Areas ......................................................... 34 5.11. Managing sites of past activity ............................................................................................ 35 5.11.1.Clean up .................................................................................................................... 36 5.11.2.Historic sites and artefacts ........................................................................................ 36 5.12. Enabling works for Scott Base Redevelopment ................................................................. 37 5.12.1.Season 2019/20 ........................................................................................................ 37 5.12.2.2020/21 – 2021/22 Seasons ..................................................................................... 39 5.13. Monitoring programmes ...................................................................................................... 39 6. Summary of permit applications ................................................................................................. 40 6.1. Interfering with native plants and invertebrates .................................................................. 40 6.2. Importing non-native micro-organisms ............................................................................... 40 6.3. ASPA entries....................................................................................................................... 41 7. Alternatives ................................................................................................................................. 43 7.1. Do not proceed ................................................................................................................... 43 7.2. Reduce period of operation ................................................................................................ 43 7.3. Reduce level of activity ....................................................................................................... 44 7.4. Reduce the area of operations ........................................................................................... 44 7.5. Reduce the size of Scott Base ............................................................................................ 44 7.6. Change energy sources ...................................................................................................... 45 7.7. Change location .................................................................................................................. 45 7.8. Summary ............................................................................................................................. 45 8. Initial environmental state ........................................................................................................... 46 8.1. Scott Base and Pram Point ................................................................................................. 46 8.1.1. Soils ............................................................................................................................ 47 8.1.2. Biota ............................................................................................................................ 47 8.1.3. Air ...............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ferraccioli Etal2008.Pdf
    Tectonophysics 478 (2009) 43–61 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Tectonophysics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tecto Magmatic and tectonic patterns over the Northern Victoria Land sector of the Transantarctic Mountains from new aeromagnetic imaging F. Ferraccioli a,⁎, E. Armadillo b, A. Zunino b, E. Bozzo b, S. Rocchi c, P. Armienti c a British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK b Dipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle Sue Risorse, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy c Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy article info abstract Article history: New aeromagnetic data image the extent and spatial distribution of Cenozoic magmatism and older Received 30 January 2008 basement features over the Admiralty Block of the Transantarctic Mountains. Digital enhancement Received in revised form 12 November 2008 techniques image magmatic and tectonic features spanning in age from the Cambrian to the Neogene. Accepted 25 November 2008 Magnetic lineaments trace major fault zones, including NNW to NNE trending transtensional fault systems Available online 6 December 2008 that appear to control the emplacement of Neogene age McMurdo volcanics. These faults represent splays from a major NW–SE oriented Cenozoic strike-slip fault belt, which reactivated the inherited early Paleozoic Keywords: – Aeromagnetic anomalies structural architecture. NE SW oriented magnetic lineaments are also typical of the Admiralty Block and fl Transantarctic Mountains re ect post-Miocene age extensional faults. To re-investigate controversial relationships between strike-slip Inheritance faulting, rifting, and Cenozoic magmatism, we combined the new aeromagnetic data with previous datasets Cenozoic magmatism over the Transantarctic Mountains and Ross Sea Rift.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Construction and Operation of a Gravel Runway in the Area of Mario Zucchelli Station, Terra Nova Bay, Victoria Land, Antarctica
    ATCM XXXIX, CEP XIX, Santiago 2016 Annex A to the WP presented by Italy Draft Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation Proposed construction and operation of a gravel runway in the area of Mario Zucchelli Station, Terra Nova Bay, Victoria Land, Antarctica January 2016 Rev. 0 (INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) TABLE OF CONTENTS Non-technical summary ...................................................................................................................... i I Introduction ........................................................................................................................ i II Need of Proposed Activities .............................................................................................. ii III Site selection and alternatives .......................................................................................... iii IV Description of the Proposed Activity ............................................................................... iv V Initial Environmental Reference State .............................................................................. v VI Identification and Prediction of Environmental Impact, Mitigation Measures of the Proposed Activities .......................................................................................................... vi VII Environmental Impact Monitoring Plan ........................................................................... ix VIII Gaps in Knowledge and Uncertainties ............................................................................. ix
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Transport of Ash and Sulfate from the 2011 Puyehue-Cordón
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres RESEARCH ARTICLE Rapid transport of ash and sulfate from the 2011 10.1002/2017JD026893 Puyehue-Cordón Caulle (Chile) eruption Key Points: to West Antarctica • Ash and sulfate from the June 2011 Puyehue-Cordón Caulle eruption were Bess G. Koffman1,2 , Eleanor G. Dowd1 , Erich C. Osterberg1 , David G. Ferris1, deposited in West Antarctica 3 3 3,4 1 • Depositional phasing and duration Laura H. Hartman , Sarah D. Wheatley , Andrei V. Kurbatov , Gifford J. Wong , 5 6 3,4 4 suggest rapid transport through the Bradley R. Markle , Nelia W. Dunbar , Karl J. Kreutz , and Martin Yates troposphere • Ash/sulfate phasing, ash size 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA, 2Now at Department of Geology, Colby distributions, and geochemistry College, Waterville, Maine, USA, 3Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA, 4School of Earth and distinguish this midlatitude eruption Climate Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, USA, 5Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of from low- and high-latitude eruptions Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 6New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico, USA Supporting Information: • Supporting Information S1 Abstract The Volcanic Explosivity Index 5 eruption of the Puyehue-Cordón Caulle volcanic complex (PCC) in central Chile, which began 4 June 2011, provides a rare opportunity to assess the rapid transport and Correspondence to: deposition of sulfate and ash from a midlatitude volcano to the Antarctic ice sheet. We present sulfate, B. G. Koffman, [email protected] microparticle concentrations of fine-grained (~5 μm diameter) tephra, and major oxide geochemistry, which document the depositional sequence of volcanic products from the PCC eruption in West Antarctic snow and shallow firn.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmurdo STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study
    McMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY Building Shell & Fenestration Study April 29, 2016 Final Submittal MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 MCMURDO STATION MODERNIZATION STUDY | APRIL 29, 2016 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1: Overview PG. 7-51 Team Directory PG. 8 Project Description PG. 9 Methodology PG. 10-11 Design Criteria/Environmental Conditions PG. 12-20 (a) General Description (b) Environmental Conditions a. Wind b. Temp c. RH d. UV e. Duration of sunlight f. Air Contaminants (c) Graphic (d) Design Criteria a. Thermal b. Air Infiltration c. Moisture d. Structural e. Fire Safety f. Environmental Impact g. Corrosion/Degradation h. Durability i. Constructability j. Maintainability k. Aesthetics l. Mechanical System, Ventilation Performance and Indoor Air Quality implications m. Structural implications PG. 21-51 Benchmarking 3 Section 2: Technical Investigation and Research PG. 53-111 Envelope Components and Assemblies PG. 54-102 (a) Components a. Cladding b. Air Barrier c. Insulation d. Vapor Barrier e. Structural f. Interior Assembly (b) Assemblies a. Roofs b. Walls c. Floors Fenestration PG. 103-111 (a) Methodology (b) Window Components Research a. Window Frame b. Glazing c. Integration to skin (c) Door Components Research a. Door i. Types b. Glazing Section 3: Overall Recommendation PG. 113-141 Total Configured Assemblies PG. 114-141 (a) Roofs a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic 4 (b) Walls a. Good i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic b. Better i. Description of priorities ii. Graphic c. Best i. Description of priorities ii.
    [Show full text]
  • A NEWS BULLETIN Published Quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC)
    A NEWS BULLETIN published quarterly by the NEW ZEALAND ANTARCTIC SOCIETY (INC) An English-born Post Office technician, Robin Hodgson, wearing a borrowed kilt, plays his pipes to huskies on the sea ice below Scott Base. So far he has had a cool response to his music from his New Zealand colleagues, and a noisy reception f r o m a l l 2 0 h u s k i e s . , „ _ . Antarctic Division photo Registered at Post Ollice Headquarters. Wellington. New Zealand, as a magazine. II '1.7 ^ I -!^I*"JTr -.*><\\>! »7^7 mm SOUTH GEORGIA, SOUTH SANDWICH Is- . C I R C L E / SOUTH ORKNEY Is x \ /o Orcadas arg Sanae s a Noydiazarevskaya ussr FALKLAND Is /6Signyl.uK , .60"W / SOUTH AMERICA tf Borga / S A A - S O U T H « A WEDDELL SHETLAND^fU / I s / Halley Bav3 MINING MAU0 LAN0 ENOERBY J /SEA uk'/COATS Ld / LAND T> ANTARCTIC ••?l\W Dr^hnaya^^General Belgrano arg / V ^ M a w s o n \ MAC ROBERTSON LAND\ '■ aust \ /PENINSULA' *\4- (see map betowi jrV^ Sobldl ARG 90-w {■ — Siple USA j. Amundsen-Scott / queen MARY LAND {Mirny ELLSWORTH" LAND 1, 1 1 °Vostok ussr MARIE BYRD L LAND WILKES LAND ouiiiv_. , ROSS|NZJ Y/lnda^Z / SEA I#V/VICTORIA .TERRE , **•»./ LAND \ /"AOELIE-V Leningradskaya .V USSR,-'' \ --- — -"'BALLENYIj ANTARCTIC PENINSULA 1 Tenitnte Matianzo arg 2 Esptrarua arg 3 Almirarrta Brown arc 4PttrtlAHG 5 Otcipcion arg 6 Vtcecomodoro Marambio arg * ANTARCTICA 7 Arturo Prat chile 8 Bernardo O'Higgins chile 1000 Miles 9 Prasid«fTtB Frei chile s 1000 Kilometres 10 Stonington I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition 1955-1958
    THE COMMONWEALTH TRANS-ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION 1955-1958 HOW THE CROSSING OF ANTARCTICA MOVED NEW ZEALAND TO RECOGNISE ITS ANTARCTIC HERITAGE AND TAKE AN EQUAL PLACE AMONG ANTARCTIC NATIONS A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree PhD - Doctor of Philosophy (Antarctic Studies – History) University of Canterbury Gateway Antarctica Stephen Walter Hicks 2015 Statement of Authority & Originality I certify that the work in this thesis has not been previously submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Elements of material covered in Chapter 4 and 5 have been published in: Electronic version: Stephen Hicks, Bryan Storey, Philippa Mein-Smith, ‘Against All Odds: the birth of the Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition, 1955-1958’, Polar Record, Volume00,(0), pp.1-12, (2011), Cambridge University Press, 2011. Print version: Stephen Hicks, Bryan Storey, Philippa Mein-Smith, ‘Against All Odds: the birth of the Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition, 1955-1958’, Polar Record, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp. 50-61, Cambridge University Press, 2013 Signature of Candidate ________________________________ Table of Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Polarforschungsagenda Status Und Perspektiven Der Deutschen
    Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees SCAR/IASC Polarforschungsagenda 2030 Status und Perspektiven der deutschen Polarforschung DFG-Statusbericht des Deutschen Nationalkomitees für Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) und International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) Deutsches Nationalkomitee SCAR/IASC Prof. G. Heinemann (Vorsitzender) Universität Trier, Fachbereich Raum- und Umweltwissenschaften Postanschrift: Behringstr. 21, 54296 Trier Telefon: +49/651/201-4630 Telefax: +49/651/201-3817 E-Mail: [email protected] www.scar-iasc.de Juli 2017 Das vorliegende Werk wurde sorgfältig erarbeitet. Dennoch übernehmen Autoren, Herausgeber und Verlag für die Richtigkeit von Angaben, Hinweisen und Ratschlägen sowie für eventuelle Druckfehler keine Haftung. Alle Rechte, insbesondere die der Übersetzung in andere Sprachen, vorbehalten. Kein Teil dieser Publikation darf ohne schrift- liche Genehmigung des Verlages in irgendeiner Form – durch Photokopie, Mikroverfilmung oder irgendein anderes Verfahren – reproduziert oder in eine von Maschinen, insbesondere von Datenverarbeitungsmaschinen, verwendbare Sprache übertra- gen oder übersetzt werden. Die Wiedergabe von Warenbezeichnungen, Handelsnamen oder sonstigen Kennzeichen in diesem Buch berechtigt nicht zu der Annahme, dass diese von jedermann frei benutzt werden dürfen. Vielmehr kann es sich auch dann um eingetragene Warenzeichen oder sonstige gesetzlich geschützte Kennzeichen handeln, wenn sie nicht eigens als solche markiert sind. All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmurdo Dry Valleys, Southern Victoria Land
    Measure 1 (2004) Annex Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Managed Area No. 2 MCMURDO DRY VALLEYS, SOUTHERN VICTORIA LAND 1. Description of values to be protected and activities to be managed The McMurdo Dry Valleys are characterized as the largest relatively ice-free region in Antarctica with approximately thirty percent of the ground surface largely free of snow and ice. The region encompasses a cold desert ecosystem, whose climate is not only cold and extremely arid (in the Wright Valley the mean annual temperature is –19.8°C and annual precipitation is less than 100 mm water equivalent), but also windy. The landscape of the Area contains glaciers, mountain ranges, ice-covered lakes, meltwater streams, arid patterned soils and permafrost, sand dunes, and interconnected watershed systems. These watersheds have a regional influence on the McMurdo Sound marine ecosystem. The Area’s location, where large-scale seasonal shifts in the water phase occur, is of great importance to the study of climate change. Through shifts in the ice-water balance over time, resulting in contraction and expansion of hydrological features and the accumulations of trace gases in ancient snow, the McMurdo Dry Valley terrain also contains records of past climate change. The extreme climate of the region serves as an important analogue for the conditions of ancient Earth and contemporary Mars, where such climate may have dominated the evolution of landscape and biota. The Area is characterized by unique ecosystems of low biodiversity and reduced food web complexity. However, as the largest ice-free region in Antarctica, the McMurdo Dry Valleys also contain relatively diverse habitats compared with other ice-free areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Nsf.Gov OPP: Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon
    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MORE AND BETTER SCIENCE IN ANTARCTICA THROUGH INCREASED A LOGISTICAL EFFECTIVENESS Report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel Washington, D.C. July 23, 2012 This booklet summarizes the report of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel, More and Better Science in Antarctica Through Increased Logistical Effectiveness. The report was completed at the request of the White House office of science and Technology Policy and the National Science Foundation. Copies of the full report may be obtained from David Friscic at [email protected] (phone: 703-292-8030). An electronic copy of the report may be downloaded from http://www.nsf.gov/ od/opp/usap_special_review/usap_brp/rpt/index.jsp. Cover art by Zina Deretsky. Front and back inside covers showing McMurdo’s Dry Valleys in Antarctica provided by Craig Dorman. CONTENTS Introduction ............................................ 1 The Panel ............................................... 2 Overall Assessment ................................. 3 U.S. Facilities in Antarctica ....................... 4 The Environmental Challenge .................... 7 Uncertainties in Logistics Planning ............. 8 Activities of Other Nations ....................... 9 Economic Considerations ....................... 10 Major Issues ......................................... 11 Single-Point Failure Modes ..................... 17 Recommendations ................................. 18 Concluding Observations ....................... 21 U.S. ANTARCTIC PROGRAM BLUE RIBBON PANEL WASHINGTON,
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND
    Management Plan For Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND 1. Description of values to be protected In 1985, two areas at Cape Bird, Ross Island were designated as SSSI No. 10, Caughley Beach (Recommendation XIII-8 (1985)) and SPA No. 20, New College Valley (Recommendation XIII-12 (1985)), following proposals by New Zealand that these areas should be protected because they contained some of the richest stands of moss and associated microflora and fauna in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. This is the only area on Ross Island where protection is specifically given to plant assemblages and associated ecosystems. At that time, SPA No. 20 was enclosed within SSSI No. 10, in order to provide more stringent access conditions to that part of the Area. In 2000, SSSI No. 10 was incorporated with SPA No. 20 by Measure 1 (2000), with the former area covered by SPA No. 20 becoming a Restricted Zone within the revised SPA No. 20. The boundaries of the Area were revised from the boundaries in the original recommendations, in view of improved mapping and to follow more closely the ridges enclosing the catchment of New College Valley. Caughley Beach itself was adjacent to, but never a part of, the original Area, and for this reason the entire Area was renamed as New College Valley, which was within both of the original sites. The Area was redesignated by Decision 1 (2002) as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 116 and a revised Management Plan was adopted through Measure 1 (2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Advance Exchange of Operational Information, 2005-2006
    Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for the 2005–2006 season United States Antarctic Program Office of Polar Programs National Science Foundation Advance Exchange of Operational Information on Antarctic Activities for 2005/2006 Season Country: UNITED STATES Date Submitted: October 2005 SECTION 1 SHIP OPERATIONS Commercial charter KRASIN Nov. 21, 2005 Depart Vladivostok, Russia Dec. 12-14, 2005 Port Call Lyttleton N.Z. Dec. 17 Arrive 60S Break channel and escort TERN and Tanker Feb. 5, 2006 Depart 60S in route to Vladivostok U.S. Coast Guard Breaker POLAR STAR The POLAR STAR will be in back-up support for icebreaking services if needed. M/V AMERICAN TERN Jan. 15-17, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ Jan. 24, 2006 Arrive Ice edge, McMurdo Sound Jan 25-Feb 1, 2006 At ice pier, McMurdo Sound Feb 2, 2006 Depart McMurdo Feb 13-15, 2006 Port Call Lyttleton, NZ T-5 Tanker, (One of five possible vessels. Specific name of vessel to be determined) Jan. 14, 2006 Arrive Ice Edge, McMurdo Sound Jan. 15-19, 2006 At Ice Pier, McMurdo. Re-fuel Station Jan. 19, 2006 Depart McMurdo R/V LAURENCE M. GOULD For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/lmg/lmgsched.pdf R/V NATHANIEL B. PALMER For detailed and updated schedule, log on to: http://www.polar.org/science/marine/sched_history/nbp/nbpsched.pdf SECTION 2 AIR OPERATIONS Information on planned air operations (see attached sheets) SECTION 3 STATIONS a) New stations or refuges not previously notified: NONE b) Stations closed or refuges abandoned and not previously notified: NONE SECTION 4 LOGISTICS ACTIVITIES AFFECTING OTHER NATIONS a) McMurdo airstrip will be used by Italian and New Zealand C-130s and Italian Twin Otters b) McMurdo Heliport will be used by New Zealand and Italian helicopters c) Extensive air, sea and land logistic cooperative support with New Zealand d) Twin Otters to pass through Rothera (UK) upon arrival and departure from Antarctica e) Italian Twin Otter will likely pass through South Pole and McMurdo.
    [Show full text]