DOCSLIB.ORG

Resistant Trees for Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resistant Trees for Florida Underutilized and new disease- resistant trees for Florida Jason A. Smith and Adam Black School of Forest Resources and Conservation University of Florida/IFAS [email protected] Why diversify? • Many landscapes lack diversity – See enough live oaks and crape myrtles yet? • Reduce impacts of pests and diseases – Many historical examples • Reduce maintenance – Less pesticides, fertilizers, irrigation etc. • Improve aesthetics! • Increase wildlife value of urban forests Today we will focus on.. • Underutilized native and non-native species – Large, medium and small – Most are adaptable to large areas of the state • Useful cultivars of native species – Columnar, weeping and interesting foliage – Cultivars are curiously absent from Florida • Disease-resistant alternatives – Available varieties – New selections in the pipeline • Trees to make you drool – Rare, but worth seeking Under-utilized small trees • Acer fabri (N,C,S?; evergreen, non-native, rare) – Also seek out Acer oliverianum ssp. formosanum and A. albo-purpurascens • Alnus serrulata (N,C, native, common) • Cephalotaxus fortunei (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Cornus florida ‘Suwanee Squat’ • Daphniphyllum calycinum (N,C,S?, non-native, uncommon) • Magnolia asheii (N,C, native, uncommon) • Nageia nagi (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Podocarpus matudae, P. henkelii etc. (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Quercus myrtifolia (N,C,S, native, common) • Quercus chapmanii (N,C,S, native, common) • Salix caroliniana (N,C,S, native, common) • Vibrunum luzonicum (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Viburnum rufidulum, V. nudum (N,C,S?, native, uncommon) Acer fabri Alnus serrulata Cephalotaxus fortunei Cornus florida ‘Suwanee Squat’ Daphniphyllum calycinum Magnolia asheii Nageia nagi Podocarpus spp. (P. henkellii, P. matudae etc.) Quercus chapmanii Quercus myrtifolia Salix caroliniana Viburnum luzonicum Viburnum rufidulum Under-utilized medium size trees • Acacia spp. (N,C,S, native and non-native, common) • Acer coriaceifolium (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Afrocarpus gracilior (N?,C,S, non-native, common) • Chamaecyparis thyoides (N,C,S, native, common – use FL seed source only) • Cupressus cashmeriana (N?,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Cupressus chengiana (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Exbucklandia populneus (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Eucalyptus neglecta (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Gordonia/Polyspora etc. (N,C,S, non-native, common) • Illicium spp. (N,C,S, native and non-native, uncommon) • Ilex latifolia (N,C,S, non-native, rare) • Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Little Volunteer’ • Magnolia insignis (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Magnolia virginiana (N,C,S, native, common) • Neolitsea sericea (N,C,S, non-native, common) • Pinus clausa (N,C,S, native, common) • Robinia pseudoacacia (N,C,S?, native (to se US), uncommon) • Quercus marilandica (N,C,S?, native, uncommon) • Quercus rysophylla (N,C,S?, non-native, rare) Acacia farnesiana Acacia sieberiana Acer coriaceafolium Afrocarpus gracilior Chamaecyparis thyoides Cupressus cashmeriana Eucalyptus neglecta Exbucklandia populneus Ilex latifolia Illicium floridanum Illicium henryi Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Little Volunteer’ Magnolia insignis Neolitsea sericea Polyspora axillaris Quercus marilandica Quercus rysophylla Under-utilized large trees • Agathis robusta (N?,C, S, non-native, uncommon) • Araucaria angustifolia (N,C,S?, non-native, uncommon) • Cinnamomum spp. (N,C,S, non-native, uncommon) • Ginkgo biloba (N,C, non-native, common) • Keteleeria evelyniana, K. davidiana (N,C,S, non-native, rare) • Liriodendron chinense, L. tulipifera (Peninsular Florida ecotype, N,C,S, native, common) • Pinus glabra (N,C,S?, native, uncommon) • Pinus patula, P. pseudostrobus (N,C,S, non-native) • Quercus acuta (N,C, non-native, uncommon) • Quercus austrina (N,C,S?, native, common) • Quercus geminata (N,C,S, native, common) • Quercus michauxii (N,C,S?, native, common) • Populus deltoides (N,C, native, uncommon) • Taiwania cryptomerioides (N,C,S?, non-native, rare) • Taxodium ascendens (N,C,S, native, common) • Tilia caroliniana ssp. Floridana (N,C,S, native, uncommon) • Ulmus americana ssp. Floridana (N,C,S, native, common) Agathis robusta Araucaria angustifolia Cinnamomum jensenianum Cinnamomum bermannii Ginkgo biloba Keteleeria spp. Liriodendron chinense Liriodendron tulipifera Pinus glabra Pinus patula Pinus pseudostrobus A word about growing pines • Best to use smaller, locally-grown stock • Plant in large groups and use pine straw or native groundcovers (no turf) • Avoid container sizes larger than 3 gallon • Soil pH is very important (slash pine is more tolerant of high pH than longleaf pine) • In general avoid fertilization and irrigation after first year Populus deltoides Populus monticola Quercus acuta Quercus austrina Quercus michauxii Taiwania cryptomerioides Taxodium ascendens Tilia caroliniana ssp. Floridana Columnar cultivars of trees • Juniperus silicicola ‘Brodie’ • Liquidambar styraciflua ‘Slender Silhouette’ • Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Arnold’ • Podocarpus macrophyllus ‘Sunshine Spire’ • Taxodium distichum ‘Peve Minaret’ • Ulmus parvifolia ‘Everclear’ Juniperus silicicola ‘Brodie’ Liquidambar styraciflua ‘Slender Silhouette’ Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Arnold’ Taxodium distichum ‘Peve Minaret’ Ulmus parvifolia ‘Everclear’ Weeping trees • Betula nigra ‘Summer Cascade’ • Celtis sinensis ‘Emerald Cascade’ • Cercis canadensis ‘Covey’ (a.k.a. ‘Lavender Twist’) • Morus alba ‘Pendula’ • Taxodium distichum ‘Cascade Falls’, ‘Falling Waters’ • Ulmus alata ‘Lace Parasol’ Betula nigra ‘Summer Cascade’ Celtis sinensis ‘Emerald Cascade’ Cercis canadensis ‘Covey’ Morus alba ‘Pendula’ Taxodium distichum ‘Cascade Falls’ Taxodium distichum ‘Falling Waters’ Ulmus alata ‘Lace Parasol’ Trees with interesting foliage • Cercis canadensis ‘Forest Pansy’ • Cercis canadensis ‘Hearts of Gold’ • Chamaecyparis obtusa cultivars • Cryptomeria japonica ‘Albospicata’, ‘Cristata’, ‘Rasen’, • Cunninghamia lanceolata ‘Glauca’ • Erioboytrya deflexa • Ficus spp. • Liquidambar styraciflua variegated cultivars; ‘Rotundiloba’ • Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Aureomarginatum’ • Morus alba ’Paper Dolls’; ‘Ho’o’ • Nyssa sylvatica ‘Wildfire’ • Podocarpus macrophyllus ‘Golden Crown’, ‘Royal Flush’ etc. • Populus deltoides ‘Purple Tower’ Cercis canadensis ‘Forest Pansy’ Cercis canadensis ‘Hearts of Gold’ Chamaecyparis obtusa cultivars Cryptomeria japonica ‘Albospicata’ Cunninghamia lanceolata ‘Glauca’ Eriobotrya deflexa Ficus gasparinniana Ficus afghanistanica Liquidambar styraciflua variegated cultivars Liriodendron tulipifera ‘Aureomarginatum’ Podocarpus elatus Podocarpus falcatus Podocarpus macrophyllus ‘Golden Crown’ Podocarpus nakaii Podocarpus smithii Populus deltoides ‘Purple Tower’ Disease resistant alternatives • Cupressus x ovensii to replace Leyland cypress • Podocarpus macrophyllus ‘Sunshine Spire’ to replace Italian Cypress • Platanus mexicana to replace P. occidentalis • Cornus angustata etc. (to replace Cornus florida) • Rust and pitch-canker resistant slash pines – Commercially available in the southeast – Horticultural vs. forestry • Redbays with resistance to laurel wilt are coming! Leyland cypress is susceptible to fungal diseases in the south Cupressus x ovensii is resistant Diseased Italian cypress are all too common in Florida. Podocarpus macrophyllus ‘Sunshine Spire’ offers a great alternative Anthracnose is one of many ailments of sycamores Platanus mexicana is resistant Trees to make you drool • Araucaria muelleri • Carpinus fangiana • Magnolia dealbata • Nageia wallichiana • Pinus lumholtzii • Podocarpus rumphii • Quercus insignis • Quercus macrophylla • Quercus virginiana ‘Grandview Gold’ Araucaria muelleri Carpinus fangiana Magnolia dealbata Nageia wallichiana Pinus lumholtzii Podocarpus rumphii Quercus insignis Quercus macrophylla Quercus virginiana ‘Grandview Gold’ Places to see unusual trees in/near Florida • Gardens of the Big Bend (UF Quincy) • UNF Campus in Jacksonville • Leu Gardens in Orlando • Selby Gardens in Sarasota • Montgomery Botanical Center (Coral Gables) • Kanapaha Botanical Garden in Gainesville • Armstrong Atlantic State University, Savannah, GA • UGA research/demonstration garden in Tifton, GA Some good online sources • Xenoflora (http://stores.ebay.com/Xenoflora) • Camellia Forest Nursery (www.camforest.com) • Far Reaches Farm (www.farreachesfarm.com) • Cistus Nursery (www.cistus.com) • Forestfarm (www.forestfarm.com) • Colvos Creek Nursery (www.colvoscreeknursery.com) • Woodlander’s Nursery (www.woodlanders.net) • Nearly Native Nursery (www.nearlynativenursery.com) • Nurseries Caroliniana (www.nurseriescaroliniana.com) • Superior Trees/Lee Nursery (www.superiortrees.net) • Yucca Do (www.yuccado.com) Thanks! [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Invasive Plants of the Southeast Flyer
    13 15 5 1 19 10 6 18 8 7 T o p 2 0 I n v a s i v e S p e c i e s 1. Chinese Privet, Ligustrum sinense 2. Nepalese Browntop, Microstegium vimineum 3. Autumn Olive, Elaeagnus umbellata 4. Chinese Wisteria, Wisteria sinensis & Japanese Wisteria, W. floribunda 5. Mimosa, Albizia julibrissin 6. Japanese Honeysuckle, Lonicera japonica 7. Amur Honeysuckle, Lonicera maackii 8. Multiflora Rose, Rosa multiflora 9. Hydrilla, Hydrilla verticillata 10. Kudzu, Pueraria montana 11. Golden Bamboo, Phyllostachys aurea 12. Oriental Bittersweet, Celastrus orbiculatus 13. English Ivy, Hedera helix 14. Tree-of-Heaven, Ailanthus altissima 15. Chinese Tallow, Sapium sebiferum 16. Chinese Princess Tree, Paulownia tomentosa 17. Japanese Knotweed, Polygonum cuspidatum 18. Silvergrass, Miscanthus sinensis 19. Thorny Olive, Elaeagnus pungens 20. Nandina, Nandina domestica The State Botanical Garden of Georgia and The Georgia Plant Conservation A l l i a n c e d e f i n i t i o n s you can help n a t i ve Avoid disturbing natural areas, including clearing of native vegetation. A native species is one that occurs in a particular region, ecosystem or habitat Know your plants. Find out if plants you without direct or indirect human action. grow have invasive tendencies. Do not use invasive species in landscaping, n o n - n a t i ve restoration, or for erosion control; use (alien, exotic, foreign, introduced, plants known not to be invasive in your area. non-indigenous) A species that occurs artificially in locations Control invasive plants on your land by beyond its known historical removing or managing them to prevent natural range.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosome Numbers in Gymnosperms - an Update
    Rastogi and Ohri . Silvae Genetica (2020) 69, 13 - 19 13 Chromosome Numbers in Gymnosperms - An Update Shubhi Rastogi and Deepak Ohri Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Research Cell, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow Campus, Malhaur (Near Railway Station), P.O. Chinhat, Luc know-226028 (U.P.) * Corresponding author: Deepak Ohri, E mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract still some controversy with regard to a monophyletic or para- phyletic origin of the gymnosperms (Hill 2005). Recently they The present report is based on a cytological data base on 614 have been classified into four subclasses Cycadidae, Ginkgoi- (56.0 %) of the total 1104 recognized species and 82 (90.0 %) of dae, Gnetidae and Pinidae under the class Equisetopsida the 88 recognized genera of gymnosperms. Family Cycada- (Chase and Reveal 2009) comprising 12 families and 83 genera ceae and many genera of Zamiaceae show intrageneric unifor- (Christenhusz et al. 2011) and 88 genera with 1104 recognized mity of somatic numbers, the genus Zamia is represented by a species according to the Plant List (www.theplantlist.org). The range of number from 2n=16-28. Ginkgo, Welwitschia and Gen- validity of accepted name of each taxa and the total number of tum show 2n=24, 2n=42, and 2n=44 respectively. Ephedra species in each genus has been checked from the Plant List shows a range of polyploidy from 2x-8x based on n=7. The (www.theplantlist.org). The chromosome numbers of 688 taxa family Pinaceae as a whole shows 2n=24except for Pseudolarix arranged according to the recent classification (Christenhusz and Pseudotsuga with 2n=44 and 2n=26 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Georgia
    1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W.
    [Show full text]
  • Taiwania-A New Evergreen Conifer for Florida
    MENNINGER: TAIWANIA—A NEW EVERGREEN 417 level of illumination and decreased proportion Comparison of the total free amino acids leads ally with decreasing light intensity. The sugar to the conclusion that they too are depleted in contents and pH of petals were not greatly the absence of adequate light. It is not apparent, influenced by degree of illumination. however, from the data at hand whether proteins In addition to the easily measurable categories were being degraded at the higher light intensi of data in Table 2, observations were made of the ties. It is likely that they were fairly well condition of flowers relative to illumination. exploited at the lower light intensities as indi Poorly illuminated flowers (13 foot-candles and cated by McNew (4). Amino acids do not, how less) had black or white centers, rather than the ever constitute a very efficient source of energy normal pink, and deteriorating peduncles unable per unit weight. to support flower heads. Vase-life of the cut-flowers in this experiment was prolonged by lighting up to the time the Discussion experimental plan called for the conclusion of the experiment. During the course of the study, The decline of photosynthetic capacity of repeated observations indicated that flowers leaves of chrysanthemum cut-flowers (Table 1) properly cared for could be maintained in useful with storage under conditions of relatively low condition three to four times as long in the light light intensity (less than 50 foot-candles) may be as in darkness. caused by the degeneration of chlorophyll under Flowers were benefited by light (Table 2) but conditions of organic nutrient stress, as well as not as much as leaves (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeo Leaf Economics Reveal a Shift in Ecosystem Function Associated with the End-Triassic Mass Extinction Event
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318473239 Palaeo leaf economics reveal a shift in ecosystem function associated with the end-Triassic mass extinction event Article in Nature Plants · July 2017 DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2017.104 CITATIONS READS 7 428 7 authors, including: Wuu Kuang Soh Karen Bacon University College Dublin University of Leeds 14 PUBLICATIONS 79 CITATIONS 15 PUBLICATIONS 167 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Margret Steinthorsdottir Andrew C Parnell Swedish Museum of Natural History Maynooth University 30 PUBLICATIONS 408 CITATIONS 103 PUBLICATIONS 5,129 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Mid-Cretaceous south polar forests View project Response of pan-Arctic permafrost peatlands to rapid climate warming View project All content following this page was uploaded by Wuu Kuang Soh on 24 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. ARTICLES PUBLISHED: XX XX 2017 | VOLUME: 3 | ARTICLE NUMBER: 17104 Palaeo leaf economics reveal a shift in ecosystem function associated with the end-Triassic mass extinction event W. K. Soh1*,I.J.Wright2,K.L.Bacon3, T. I. Lenz2, M. Steinthorsdottir4,5,A.C.Parnell6 and J. C. McElwain1 Climate change is likely to have altered the ecological functioning of past ecosystems, and is likely to alter functioning in the future; however, the magnitude and direction of such changes are difficult to predict. Here we use a deep-time case study to evaluate the impact of a well-constrained CO2-induced global warming event on the ecological functioning of dominant plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of Illinois Native Trees
    Technical Forestry Bulletin · NRES-102 Checklist of Illinois Native Trees Jay C. Hayek, Extension Forestry Specialist Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Sciences Updated May 2019 This Technical Forestry Bulletin serves as a checklist of Tree species prevalence (Table 2), or commonness, and Illinois native trees, both angiosperms (hardwoods) and gym- county distribution generally follows Iverson et al. (1989) and nosperms (conifers). Nearly every species listed in the fol- Mohlenbrock (2002). Additional sources of data with respect lowing tables† attains tree-sized stature, which is generally to species prevalence and county distribution include Mohlen- defined as having a(i) single stem with a trunk diameter brock and Ladd (1978), INHS (2011), and USDA’s The Plant Da- greater than or equal to 3 inches, measured at 4.5 feet above tabase (2012). ground level, (ii) well-defined crown of foliage, and(iii) total vertical height greater than or equal to 13 feet (Little 1979). Table 2. Species prevalence (Source: Iverson et al. 1989). Based on currently accepted nomenclature and excluding most minor varieties and all nothospecies, or hybrids, there Common — widely distributed with high abundance. are approximately 184± known native trees and tree-sized Occasional — common in localized patches. shrubs found in Illinois (Table 1). Uncommon — localized distribution or sparse. Rare — rarely found and sparse. Nomenclature used throughout this bulletin follows the Integrated Taxonomic Information System —the ITIS data- Basic highlights of this tree checklist include the listing of 29 base utilizes real-time access to the most current and accept- native hawthorns (Crataegus), 21 native oaks (Quercus), 11 ed taxonomy based on scientific consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia
    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
    [Show full text]
  • Agathis Macrophylla Araucariaceae (Lindley) Masters
    Agathis macrophylla (Lindley) Masters Araucariaceae LOCAL NAMES English (pacific kauri); Fijian (da‘ua,dakua dina,makadri,makadre,takua makadre,dakua,dakua makadre) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Agathis macrophylla is a tall tree typically to about 30–40 m tall, 3 m in bole diameter, with a broad canopy of up to 36 m diameter. Branches may be erect to horizontal and massive. Mature specimens have wide, spreading root systems whereas seedlings and young specimens have a vigorous taproot with one or more whorls of lateral roots. Leaves simple, entire, elliptic to lanceolate, leathery, and dark green, and shiny above and often glaucous below; about 7–15 cm long and 2–3.5 cm wide, with many close inconspicuous parallel veins. The leaves taper to a more or less pointed tip, rounded at the base, with the margins curved down at the edge. Petioles short, from almost sessile up to 5 mm long. Cones egg-shaped at the end of the first year, about 5 cm long, and 3 cm in diameter, more or less round at the end of the second year, 8–10 cm in diameter. Female cones much larger than males, globular, on thick woody stalks, green, slightly glaucous, turning brownish during ripening. Seeds brown, small, ovoid to globose, flattened, winged, and attached to a triangular cone scale about 2.5 cm across. BIOLOGY Pacific kauri is monoecious and produces cones instead of flowers. The first female cones begin to be produced at about 10 years old and take up to 2 years to mature (more often in 12-15 months).
    [Show full text]
  • TREE SHRUB AVA 08.23.2021Wo
    CREEKSIDE NURSERY AVAILABILITY 18729 FM 1887 Week of September 27, 2021 Hempstead, TX 77445 Phone: 800-858-7389 Fax: 800-826-5434 www.creeksidenursery.com BAMBOO CACTI AND SUCCULENTS BAMBOO GOLDEN GODDESS 5G 2-2.5'H AVG SEDUM KAMTSCHATICUM GREEN 4" FULL POT CACTI AND SUCCULENTS SEDUM SUNSPARKLER TM FIRECRACKER QT New Crop, Pot Full, #9 AGAVE AMERICANA 15G New Crop, 16"H X 16"S SEDUM VOODOO 4" LAST OF CROP AGAVE BACCARAT TC2 New Crop, Pot Full SENECIO BLUE QT Pot Full, #25 AGAVE BLUE GLOW 7G 12-14"H X 11-13"S, New Cr YUCCA RED 3G 14"H X 14"S, New Crop AGAVE BUTTERFINGER 5G 12-14"H, Pot Full YUCCA RED 7G 18-20"H X 20'S, New Crop, AGAVE CALAMAR TC2 New Crop, Light Roots YUCCA RED GIANT 5G Landscape Quality AGAVE DESERT DIAMOND TM TC2 New Crop, Light Roots YUCCA SAPPHIRE SKIES 5G Landscape Quality AGAVE FERDINAND REGIS TC2 Small, Multies YUCCA SOFT LEAF 5G Mixed Sizes AGAVE PARRYI TC2 New Crop, Pot Full YUCCA SPANISH DAGGER VARIEGATED 5G New Crop, 10"H AGAVE SILVER SURFER 5G New Crop, Small, Light Ro EDIBLES AGAVE SPLENDIDA TC2 New Crop, Variegated Mid- APPLE FUJI 15G 5-6'H AGAVE SPLENDIDA 7G Pot Full, Multies BLACKBERRY ARAPAHO THORNLESS 1G New Crop, Staked AGAVE TRUNCATA TC2 New Crop, Small BLACKBERRY KIOWA 1G New Crop, Staked AGAVE TRUNCATA 7G New Crop, 6-8"H FIG BROWN TURKEY 5G 2.5-3'H, Seasonal Foliage ALOE WHITE FOX QT New Crop, Pot Full, #1 FIG LSU PURPLE 5G 2.5-3'H, Seasonal Foliage APTENIA VARIEGATED QT New Crop, Light Roots #11 PEAR ORIENT 15G 7-8'H, Going Dormant CACTUS ECHINOCEREUS HEDGEHOG TC2 New Crop, Pot Full PEAR WARREN 15G
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites
    Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites (Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park, Upper Marikina-Kaliwa Forest Reserve, Bago River Watershed and Forest Reserve, Naujan Lake National Park and Subwatersheds, Mt. Kitanglad Range Natural Park and Mt. Apo Natural Park) Philippines Biodiversity & Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy & Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) 23 March 2015 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. The Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience Program is funded by the USAID, Contract No. AID-492-C-13-00002 and implemented by Chemonics International in association with: Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Ecological Assessments in the B+WISER Sites Philippines Biodiversity and Watersheds Improved for Stronger Economy and Ecosystem Resilience (B+WISER) Program Implemented with: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Other National Government Agencies Local Government Units and Agencies Supported by: United States Agency for International Development Contract No.: AID-492-C-13-00002 Managed by: Chemonics International Inc. in partnership with Fauna and Flora International (FFI) Haribon Foundation World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) 23 March
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnamese Conifers and Some Problems of Their Sustainable Utilization Ke Loc Et Al
    Vietnamese conifers and some problems of their sustainable utilization Ke Loc et al. Vietnamese conifers and some problems of their sustainable utilization Phan Ke Loc 1, 2, Nguyen Tien Hiep 2, Nguyen Duc To Luu 3, Philip Ian Thomas 4, Aljos Farjon 5, L.V. Averyanov 6, J.C. Regalado, Jr. 7, Nguyen Sinh Khang 2, Georgina Magin 8, Paul Mathew 8, Sara Oldfield 9, Sheelagh O’Reilly 8, Thomas Osborn 10, Steven Swan 8 and To Van Thao 2 1 University of Natural Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi; 2 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources; 3 Vietnam Central Forest Seed Company; 4 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh; 5 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 6 Komarov Botanical Institute; 7 Missouri Botanical Garden; 8 Fauna & Flora International; 9 Global Trees Campaign; 10 Independent Consultant Introduction Vietnam is now recognized as one of the top ten global conifer conservation ‘hotspots’, as defined by the Conifer Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN). Vietnam’s conifer flora has approximately 34 species that are indigenous to the country, making up about 5% of conifers known worldwide. Although conifers represent only less than 0.3% of the total number of higher vascular plant species of Vietnam, they are of great ecological, cultural and economic importance. Most conifer wood is prized for its high value in house construction, furniture making, etc. The decline of conifer populations in Vietnam has caused serious concern among scientists. Threats to conifer species are substantial and varied, ranging from logging (both commercial and subsistence), land clearing for agriculture, and forest fire. Over the past twelve years (1995-2006), Vietnam Botanical Conservation Program (VBCP), a scientific cooperation between the Missouri Botanical Garden in Saint Louis and the Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources in Hanoi, has conducted various studies on this important group of plants in order to gather baseline information necessary to make sound recommendations for their conservation and sustainable use.
    [Show full text]