DOCSLIB.ORG

Celebrating a Century of Progress Physics Uspekhi Was Set up 100 Years Ago to Support the Fledgling Physics Community in the Soviet Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Celebrating a Century of Progress Physics Uspekhi Was Set up 100 Years Ago to Support the Fledgling Physics Community in the Soviet Union News & Analysis physicsworld.com Celebrating a century of progress Physics Uspekhi was set up 100 years ago to support the fledgling physics community in the Soviet Union. A century later, the journal’s current editor-in-chief Valery Rubakov talks to Matin Durrani about the future of Russian physics How did your interest in physics began to pick up and the country has begin? been spending about 1% of its gross I studied physics at Moscow State domestic product on research and University, graduating in 1978 and Rubakov Valery development. Do you think this then was awarded a PhD at the is enough? Institute for Nuclear Research of If I compare today’s situation with the Russian Academy of Sciences the 1990s then we are a lot better off in 1981. I have been affiliated to now. However, doing fundamental both institutions ever since, work- science is still difficult. I have no ing in areas such as quantum field idea of the share of fundamental sci- theory, elementary particle physics ence in overall research and develop- and cosmology. ment spending, but I definitely feel that fundamental science is either What has been your most notable underfunded or funded improperly, achievement? or, most likely, both. Hard to say, but what I am probably best known for is the idea of baryon In 2014 Russian president Vladimir number non-conservation in the Putin called for all state research early universe within the Standard funding to be distributed via a Model of particle physics and its competitive grants system. What extensions. This result, obtained happened to this plan? together with Vadim Kuzmin and Serving the starts contracting, then stops before I think it is impossible to distrib- Mikhail Shaposhnikov, was initially community a hot expansion begins. But are there ute all state research funding via a widely debated because under condi- Theoretical physicist theoretically consistent models that grants system. Therefore such a pro- tions that can be reached in the labo- Valery Rubakov is agree with existing observational posal could not work – and indeed ratory this effect is totally negligible. editor-in-chief of the data? And can one discriminate it didn’t. In fact, this idea would be Yet we claimed that it becomes rele- reviews journal between different scenarios on the very destructive, especially in view of vant at extremely high temperatures Physics Uspekhi. basis of future observations? a large network of research institu- that were most likely present in the tions in Russia. And I think it would very early universe. Today this idea So what’s your verdict? be destructive anywhere: fighting is widely accepted in the community It appears that the answer to all these for grants instead of doing science is and is a basic ingredient towards questions is yes. I find it fascinating not a good use of a scientist. On the explaining the matter–antimatter that observations at cosmological other hand, it makes sense to distrib- asymmetry in the universe. A review scales can tell, at least in principle ute some, fairly substantial, part of on this topic (Physics Uspekhi 39 and most probably in reality, what state funding in the form of grants. 461) was published in the issue dedi- the universe was like at these very Today, there are two foundations in cated to the 75th birthday of Andrei early times at extremely high energy fundamental science that do this in Sakharov who, among other things, density and high expansion rate. Russia: the Russian Foundation for pioneered the study of matter–anti- This is a rapidly developing area, and Basic Research and the Russian Sci- matter asymmetry. we regularly publish reviews on this ence Foundation. Overall, I think and related topics in Physics Uspekhi. the balance between institutional What are you currently working on and grant funding is reasonable in that you find most exciting? After communism, science in Russia Russia. I emphasize the balance, I think studying the “extremely suffered badly and many researchers rather than the amount of funding early” universe is very exciting, i.e. moved abroad. Were you ever or the ways the money is spent. the time just a tiniest fraction of a tempted to leave? second after the Big Bang (possibly Yes, I seriously considered various Is Russian physics competitive? 10 –35 s). Observations of the cosmic offers from the US and Europe in My experience with Physics Uspekhi microwave background (CMB) une- the 1990s and 2000s. But in all cases shows that physics in Russia is rea- quivocally show that the hot cosmo- I found that I felt a lot more com- sonably healthy and may become logical epoch was not the first one – it fortable in Moscow. It paid off. I am even more competitive internation- was preceded by another epoch in If I compare now a member of an excellent group ally in the foreseeable future. which matter density inhomogenei- today’s of theorists at my institute and have ties were generated. What was that situation with several former students worldwide Are you happy with the amount of epoch? The best guess is inflation, the 1990s then with whom I keep in contact. international collaboration Russian but this is not yet proven. There are physicists have with other countries? competing theories such as a “bounc- we are a lot Research funding plummeted in I think the level of international col- ing” scenario in which the universe better off now Russia in the early 1990s, but slowly laboration is very uneven. It strongly 12 Physics World November 2018 physicsworld.com News & Analysis depends on the topic, institution and If I want How does the journal serve the we certainly continue our efforts to even the research group in the insti- to learn Russian physics community? remain even more relevant. tution. Sometimes the collaboration I think this journal still has a place is very strong, but often it barely something not only in Russian science but also Do you think the journal will still be exists. Overall, I think Russian phys- beyond internationally. After all, it is a good around in another 100 years? And, if icists should take more advantage of my current review journal that publishes excel- so, what changes do you envisage? international partnership. lent authors. Yes, they are mostly I think Physics Uspekhi has a good expertise, I’ve Russians, but they are writing for the future for another 100 years and Physics Uspekhi was founded in 1918 always turned whole community. Physics Uspekhi is more but its role will change. The shortly after the First World War had to Physics one of a few Russian physics journals journal per se will no longer be a ended for the Soviet Union. What Uspekhi, as that sets the standard and, I hope, major source of information and that role would you say the journal has also at international level. is already partially true today. The played in Russian physics over the well as to other When I was starting my career, it easiest way to retrieve a paper will last 100 years? review journals was my dream to publish in Physics be through arXiv, with the journal If I want to learn something beyond like it Uspekhi, and I am confident that serving as a quality stamp. The role my current expertise, I’ve always having a review paper published in of review journals, including Physics turned to Physics Uspekhi, as well as the journal is still considered pres- Uspekhi, will increase, I think. As to other review journals like it. The tigious. The journal also serves the amount of information will grow, fact that it is a Russian journal is, the Russian physics community searching for good authors and per- of course, important as well. In the in various other ways such as by suading them to write reviews for the Communist era, publishing abroad, publishing biographical notes and benefit of community will become especially review papers, was quite conference proceedings. more important. As for content, I difficult, so the journal served as expect many more interdisciplinary a bridge between Russian physics When Physics Uspekhi celebrated its papers and technological advances and the outside world. Indeed, this 90th birthday, then editor-in-chief will be incorporated too such as 3D year we are celebrating not only 100 Vitaly Ginzburg called on the images and animations. years of the journal, known officially editorial board to commission more as Uspekhi Fizicheskih Nauk, but papers to ensure the journal stays Would you still study physics if you also 60 years of its English transla- “relevant”. Were his wishes fulfilled? were a student again? tion. The English-language version One can never be satisfied with Yes. But I think I would try to be was originally entitled Soviet Phys- what is done, but I think Ginzburg’s more diverse. Besides studying parti- ics Uspekhi before being renamed wishes did become reality. In the cle physics, astroparticle physics and Physics Uspekhi in 1993 and is last 10 years we have attracted more cosmology, I would try to become an now published in partnership with quality papers and the current list of expert in condensed-matter physics, IOP Publishing. accepted papers is impressive. But biophysics and other areas. Publishing Study reveals up to 17% citation boost for physicists who move abroad Physicists who migrate receive up to Happy travellers tions, Petersen claims. 17% more citations than colleagues iStock Going abroad could Published in the Journal of the who stay at home, an analysis of the boost your citation Royal Society Interface, the study also careers of more than 26 000 phys- record by as much as finds that physicists move around a ics researchers has revealed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Higgs Boson and the Cosmology of the Early Universe Mikhail Shaposhnikov Blois 2018
    The Higgs Boson and the Cosmology of the Early Universe Mikhail Shaposhnikov Blois 2018 Rencontres de Blois, June 4, 2018 – p. 1 Almost 6 years with the Higgs boson: July 4, 2012, Higgs at ATLAS and CMS 3500 ATLAS Data Sig+Bkg Fit (m =126.5 GeV) 3000 H Bkg (4th order polynomial) 2500 Events / 2 GeV 2000 1500 s=7 TeV, ∫Ldt=4.8fb-1 1000 s=8 TeV, ∫Ldt=5.9fb-1 γγ→ 500 H (a) 200100 110 120 130 140 150 160 100 0 -100 Events - Bkg (b) -200 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 Data S/B Weighted 100 Sig+Bkg Fit (m =126.5 GeV) H Bkg (4th order polynomial) 80 weights / 2 GeV Σ 60 40 20 (c) 8100 110 120 130 140 150 160 4 0 -4 (d) -8 Σ weights - Bkg 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 m γγ [GeV] Rencontres de Blois, June 4, 2018 – p. 2 What did we learn from the Higgs discovery for particle physics? Rencontres de Blois, June 4, 2018 – p. 3 The ideas of the authors of the BEH mechanism were right Rencontres de Blois, June 4, 2018 – p. 4 The Standard Model is now complete Rencontres de Blois, June 4, 2018 – p. 5 126 125 U U U GeV Triumph of the SM in particle physics No significant deviations from the SM have been observed Rencontres de Blois, June 4, 2018 – p. 6 126 125 U U U GeV Triumph of the SM in particle physics No significant deviations from the SM have been observed The masses of the top quark and of the Higgs boson, the Nature has chosen, make the SM a self-consistent effective field theory all the way up to the quantum gravity Planck scale MP .
    [Show full text]
  • The Grand Battle
    the grand battle Alexander Kartavtsev 23 July 2013 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 1 Angels and demons Outline 1. Experimental observations 2. Theoretical advancements 3. Electroweak baryogenesis 4. Baryogenesis via leptogenesis 5. Current status 6. Summary 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 3 Antimatter predicted (1928) … during his postgraduate years he concentrated solely on his research, and stopped only on Sunday, when he took long strolls alone … Paul Dirac 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 5 Antimatter discovered (1932) Carl Anderson 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 7 Cosmic rays (1936) Homi Bhabha 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 8 Cosmic rays contain positrons and antiprotons 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 9 Cosmic rays would contain complex antiatoms 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 10 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 11 CMB (1965) Robert Woodrow Wilson Arno Allan Penzias 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 13 Baryon to photon ratio = 6.1x10-10 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 14 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 15 BBN η = 5.8x10-10 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 16 Inflation Alan Guth 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 17 Generation of the baryon asymmetry 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 18 Sakharov conditions (1967) Violation of baryon number C- and CP-violation Deviation from equilibrium Andrei Sakharov 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 19 Standard model (1967) Sheldon Glashow Steven Weinberg Abdus Salam 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 20 Baryon number violation ? 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 21 Dirac sea 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 23 Dirac sea 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 24 Sphalerons (1984) Frans Klinkhamer Nick Manton 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 26 CP-violation James Cronin Val Fitch 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 27 Deviation from equilibrium 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 28 First order transition ? 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 29 Electroweak baryogenesis (1985) Valery Rubakov Vadim Kuzmin Mikhail Shaposhnikov 23 July 2013 Alexander Kartavtsev 30 B-L = const.
    [Show full text]
  • Scale Invariant Models for BSM Physics and Cosmology Mikhail Shaposhnikov
    Scale invariant models for BSM physics and cosmology Mikhail Shaposhnikov SUSY: Model-building and Phenomenology IPMU, 4 December 2013 Tokyo, 4 December 2013 – p. 1 M.S., Daniel Zenhäusern, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 162 M.S., Daniel Zenhäusern, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 187 F. Tkachov, M.S., arXiv:0905.4857 Diego Blas, M.S., Daniel Zenhäusern, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 044001 Juan García-Bellido, Javier Rubio, M.S., Daniel Zenhäusern, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 123504 F. Bezrukov, M. Kalmykov, B. Kniehl, M.S. JHEP 1210(2012) 140 Juan García-Bellido, Javier Rubio, M.S., Phys. Lett. (2012) F. Bezrukov, G. K. Karananas, J. Rubio and M.S., Phys. Rev. D 87, 096001 (2013) R. Armillis, A. Monin and M.S., JHEP 1310, 030 (2013) A. Monin and M. S., Phys. Rev. D 88, 067701 (2013) Tokyo, 4 December 2013 – p. 2 Outline The proposal in short Diff versus TDiff Field theory: classical scale invariance and its spontaneous breakdown Unimodular gravity Scale invariance, unimodular gravity, cosmological constant, inflation and dark energy Quantum scale invariance Dilaton as a part of the metric in TDiff gravity Conclusions Tokyo, 4 December 2013 – p. 3 An alternative to SUSY, large extra dimensions, technicolor, etc Effective Theory Of Everything Tokyo, 4 December 2013 – p. 4 An alternative to SUSY, large extra dimensions, technicolor, etc Effective Theory Of Everything Tokyo, 4 December 2013 – p. 5 Definitions “Effective”: valid up to the Planck scale, quantum gravity problem is not addressed. No new particles heavier than the Higgs boson. “Everything”: neutrino masses and oscillations dark matter baryon asymmetry of the Universe inflation dark energy Tokyo, 4 December 2013 – p.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Model Meets Gravity: Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Inflation
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 103, 033006 (2021) Standard model meets gravity: Electroweak symmetry breaking and inflation † ‡ Mikhail Shaposhnikov ,* Andrey Shkerin , and Sebastian Zell Institute of Physics, Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, École Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland (Received 19 February 2020; revised 23 November 2020; accepted 2 February 2021; published 25 February 2021) We propose a model for combining the Standard Model (SM) with gravity. It relies on a nonminimal coupling of the Higgs field to the Ricci scalar and on the Palatini formulation of gravity. Without introducing any new degrees of freedom in addition to those of the SM and the graviton, this scenario achieves two goals. First, it generates the electroweak symmetry breaking by a nonperturbative gravitational effect. In this way, it does not only address the hierarchy problem but opens up the possibility to calculate the Higgs mass. Second, the model incorporates inflation at energies below the onset of strong-coupling of the theory. Provided that corrections due to new physics above the scale of inflation are not unnaturally large, we can relate inflationary parameters to data from collider experiments. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.033006 I. INTRODUCTION Other experimental and observational data that calls for The results of LHC have been very exciting. First, it has new physics, such as dark matter, neutrino oscillations and found the last missing particle of the Standard Model (SM), baryon asymmetry of the Universe, does not require the presence of any new particle populating the desert between the Higgs boson [1,2]. Second, it has significantly con- 2 strained physics beyond the SM.
    [Show full text]
  • Roadmap for Astronomy in Switzerland 2007-2016
    Roadmap for Astronomy in Switzerland 2007– 2016 Cover picture: Marsflash Till Credner, AlltheSky.com Contents 3 Preface The purpose and scope of this document 6 Executive Summary 8 Summary list of the Roadmap Statements, Findings and Recommendations Chapter 1 13 Why is astronomy important today? Chapter 2 20 The broader context of Swiss astrophysics Chapter 3 29 Building on a strong foundation: Swiss astronomy in the past decade Chapter 4 41 The future scientific development of Swiss astrophysics Chapter 5 71 Transforming professional astrophysics education in Switzerland Chapter 6 74 Making science possible: Technology development for astronomy Chapter 7 82 Sharing the excitement: Public education and outreach 86 Concluding Remarks Appendix A 88 Research Networks Appendix B 91 List of acronyms and project names Roadmap for Astronomy 2007-2016 1 A Hubble Space Telescope image of a small region of M27, the Dumbell Nebula, showing small dense knots of gas ejected by the dying star, each containing a few times the mass of the Earth. NASA/ESA Preface The purpose and scope of this document Who was this document prepared by? We are the College of Helvetic Astronomy Profes- sors (CHAPS) which represents the full range of This Roadmap for Astronomy 2007-2016 was pre- astronomical interests within our community, and is pared by the 21 elected Professors in Astrophys- small enough that all members were strongly in- ics at Swiss universities, plus representatives of volved in the production of the Roadmap. The three independent laboratories: IRSOL,
    [Show full text]
  • Why Should We Care About the Top Quark Yukawa Coupling?1
    Why should we care about the top quark Yukawa coupling?1 Fedor Bezrukov1, 2, 3, ∗ and Mikhail Shaposhnikov4, y 1CERN, CH-1211 Gen`eve23, Switzerland 2Physics Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3046, USA 3RIKEN-BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA 4Institut de Th´eoriedes Ph´enom`enesPhysiques, Ecole´ Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland (Dated: March 16, 2015) In the cosmological context, for the Standard Model to be valid up to the scale of inflation, crit the top quark Yukawa coupling yt should not exceed the critical value yt , coinciding with good precision (about 0.2 ) with the requirement of the stability of the electroweak vacuum. So, the exact measurementsh of yt may give an insight on the possible existence and the energy scale of new physics above 100 GeV, which is extremely sensitive to yt. We overview the most recent crit theoretical computations of yt and the experimental measurements of yt. Within the theoretical 7 and experimental uncertainties in yt the required scale of new physics varies from 10 GeV to the Planck scale, urging for precise determination of the top quark Yukawa coupling. I. INTRODUCTION This raises a number of questions: \Have we got at last the ultimate theory of Nature?" and \If not, where we In the Spring of 2014 Valery Rubakov was visiting should search for new physics?" CERN and joined a bunch of theorists for a lunch at The answer to the first question is well known and it the CERN canteen. As often happens, the conversation is negative.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Slow-Developing Cosmic-Ray Showers: Looking for Evidence of Exotic Primaries at the Pierre Auger Observatory
    SEARCHING FOR SLOW-DEVELOPING COSMIC-RAY SHOWERS: LOOKING FOR EVIDENCE OF EXOTIC PRIMARIES AT THE PIERRE AUGER OBSERVATORY by Eric William Mayotte c Copyright by Eric William Mayotte, 2016 All Rights Reserved A thesis submitted to the Faculty and the Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Science (Applied Physics). Golden, Colorado Date Signed: Eric William Mayotte Signed: Dr. Frederic Sarazin Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date Signed: Dr. Jeff Squier Professor and Head Department of Physics ii ABSTRACT The central purpose of this research was to add the event propagation velocity to the list of shower parameters that the Florescence Detector of Pierre Auger Observatory is capable of measuring. This capability was then leveraged to differentiate exotic slow moving events from the rest of the cosmic ray flux. Clearly, by relativistic necessity, all known cosmic ray primaries can only cause a measurable extensive air shower at velocities indistinguishably close to the speed of light. Therefore any accurate observation of an event propagating slower than the speed of light would provide an unmistakable indicator of new physics. A particle must possess very specific characteristics in order to be capable of producing a slow shower. High mass Strangelets, macroscopic dark matter, and super-symmetric Q- Balls were identified as strong candidates. Theory supporting high mass Strangelets and macroscopic dark matter appeared too late for full inclusion in this work, however super- symmetric Q-Balls were thoroughly examined. CORSIKA simulations were used to show that the fluorescence detector of the Pierre Auger Observatory has sensitivity to Q-Balls with a mass M > 3.25 1027GeV c−2 while the surface detector is sensitive at a mass Q × M > 1.15 1027GeV c−2.
    [Show full text]
  • BSM Physics with Light Particles Mikhail Shaposhnikov
    BSM Physics with Light Particles Mikhail Shaposhnikov Journée SHiP/Physique du secteur caché Paris - LPNHE, October 11, 2017 – p. 1 Motivation The Standard Model in now complete: the last particle - Higgs boson, predicted by the SM, has been found Paris - LPNHE, October 11, 2017 – p. 2 Motivation The Standard Model in now complete: the last particle - Higgs boson, predicted by the SM, has been found No significant deviations from the SM have been observed Paris - LPNHE, October 11, 2017 – p. 2 Motivation The Standard Model in now complete: the last particle - Higgs boson, predicted by the SM, has been found No significant deviations from the SM have been observed The masses of the top quark and of the Higgs boson, the Nature has chosen, make the SM a self-consistent effective field theory all the way up to the quantum gravity Planck scale MP . 1609.02503 The theory is mathematically consistent and does not lose predictability up to very high en- 19 ergies MP ∼ 10 GeV Paris - LPNHE, October 11, 2017 – p. 2 Motivation The Standard Model in now complete: the last particle - Higgs boson, predicted by the SM, has been found No significant deviations from the SM have been observed The masses of the top quark and of the Higgs boson, the Nature has chosen, make the SM a self-consistent effective field theory all the way up to the quantum gravity Planck scale MP . 1609.02503 The theory is mathematically consistent and does not lose predictability up to very high en- 19 ergies MP ∼ 10 GeV How to reconsile this with evidence for new physics? Paris - LPNHE, October 11, 2017 – p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model Higgs Boson As the Inflaton
    The StandardModel Higgsboson as the inflaton Fedor Bezrukov a,b, Mikhail Shaposhnikov a a Institut de Th´eorie des Ph´enom`enes Physiques, Ecole´ Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland b Institute for Nuclear Research of Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect 60-letiya Oktyabrya 7a, Moscow 117312, Russia Abstract We argue that the Higgs boson of the Standard Model can lead to inflation and produce cosmological perturbations in accordance with observations. An essential requirement is the non-minimal coupling of the Higgs scalar field to gravity; no new particle besides already present in the electroweak theory is required. Key words: Inflation, Higgs field, Standard Model, Variable Planck mass, Non-minimal coupling PACS: 98.80.Cq, 14.80.Bn 1. Introduction tic coupling constant λ 10−13 [7]. This value of the mass is close to the GUT∼ scale, which is often con- The fact that our universe is almost flat, homoge- sidered as an argument in favour of existence of new neous and isotropic is often considered as a strong physics between the electroweak and Planck scales. indication that the Standard Model (SM) of elemen- The aim of the present Letter is to demonstrate that tary particles is not complete. Indeed, these puzzles, the SM itself can give rise to inflation. The spectral together with the problem of generation of (almost) index and the amplitude of tensor perturbations can be scale invariant spectrum of perturbations, necessary for predicted and be used to distinguish this possibility from structure formation, are most elegantly solved by in- other models for inflation; these parameters for the SM flation [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6].
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Tina Kahniashvili Curriculum Vitae Personal Data Contact Information Address: Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh,15213, USA E-mail: [email protected] Tel: (1-412) 268-1818 Fax :(1-412) 681-0648 ResearchID: C-4983-2015 ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0217-9852 Education & Training 2000: Doctor of Sciences (Habilitation) in Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Thesis: “Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Formation” Lebedev Physics Institute (FIAN) of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia 1999: Senior Doctorate Fellowship at Astro-Space Center of Russian Academy of Sciences 1988: Ph.D. in Physics, Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Thesis “Gravitational Instability in the Universe with Weakly Interacting Particles” Supervisors: Profs. V.N. Lukash and I. D. Novikov, 1984: M.S. in Physics with High Honor (Theoretical Physics), Tbilisi State University, Georgia Thesis “Gauge Invariant Theory of Gravitational Perturbations” Supervision of Prof. V.N. Lukash, completed through Student Research (Diploma) Fellowship at Space Research Institute (IKI) Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia 1984: M.S. in Physics Education with High Honor, Tbilisi State University, Georgia 1983: B.S. in Physics with High Honor (Theoretical Physics), Tbilisi State University, Georgia Affiliations Current Positions 2013 (Jul) – present: Associate research professor, Carnegie Mellon University, USA 2010 (Oct) – present: Professor of physics and astronomy, Ilia State University, Georgia 2008
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1703.02964V2 [Hep-Ph] 2 Jun 2017 1 Introduction and Motivation
    Gauge coupling unification without leptoquarks Georgios K. Karananas, Mikhail Shaposhnikov Institute of Physics Laboratory of Particle Physics and Cosmology Ecole´ Polytechnique F´ed´erale de Lausanne (EPFL) CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland [email protected] [email protected] Abstract We propose an interpretation of the gauge coupling unification scale which is not related to any new particle threshold. We revisit Grand Unified Theories and show that it is possible to completely eliminate the scalar as well as vector leptoquarks from the particle physics spectrum. As a consequence, in our approach the gauge hierarchy problem is put on different grounds, and the proton may be absolutely stable. In order to achieve that, we employ a number of nonlinear gauge-invariant constraints which only affect the superheavy degrees of freedom. We illustrate our considerations in a model based on the SU(5) group, with the generalization to other groups being straightforward. We discuss how scale or conformal invariance may be added to our proposal. arXiv:1703.02964v2 [hep-ph] 2 Jun 2017 1 Introduction and motivation Arguably, the biggest triumph of utilizing the gauge principle is the successful description of the strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions in the context of a self-consistent theory based on the groups SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1), the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics. This framework has been remarkably successful, for it made it possible to explain a vast number of phenomena at the subatomic level, and moreover, all the particles that it predicts have now been discovered. Nevertheless, the indications that the SM is not the final theory of Nature are compelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Immanuel KANT and a New Physics
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science (IJARPS) Volume 7, Issue 9, 2019, PP 13-26 ISSN No. (Online) 2349-7882 www.arcjournals.org Immanuel KANT and a New Physics Stanislav Konstantinov¹*, Stefano Veneroni² 1Department of Physical Electronics, Herzen State Pedagogical University, Saint Petersburg RSC”Energy”, Russia 2Department of Italian Studies, University of Eastern Piedmont, Vercelli, Italy *Corresponding Author: Stanislav Konstantinov, Department of Physical Electronics, Herzen State Pedagogical University, Saint Petersburg RSC”Energy”, Russia Abstract: A new Physics is born at the time of the crisis of theoretical physics and the entire scientific paradigm. The article proposes to come back to Immanuel Kant's philosophical heritage and, in particular, to his monograph “Critique of pure reason”, in order to better understand the concept of quantum vacuum (dark matter) in “New Physics” and its participation in all interactions in an open Universe. Keywords: quantum vacuum, dark matter, electromagnetism, gravity, nuclear forces PACS Number: 01.10.Fv, 04.50.-h, 12.10.Kt, 95.36.+x, 98.80.-k 1. INTRODUCTION Nowadays, in the scientific community, there is no unambiguous definition for the concept of “New Physics”. So Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, chief researcher at the Institute for Nuclear Research Valery Rubakov, who received Hamburg Prize in Theoretical Physics 2020 believes that despite all efforts, no experimental indications of a “new Physics” have yet been received. In his article “Higgs Boson”, he writes: “This is actually already starting to cause concern: is it right we all understand, it‟s quite possible, however, that we still haven‟t reached the “new physics” in terms of energy and in the amount of data collected.
    [Show full text]