DOCSLIB.ORG

ORNITHOLOGICAL MASTERCLASS 2 Bird Evolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ORNITHOLOGICAL MASTERCLASS 2 Bird Evolution ORNITHOLOGICAL MASTERCLASS 2 Bird Evolution Chris Cooney and Gavin Thomas take us on a whistle-stop tour through ▲ Fossils like Archaeopteryx have the last 165 million years to explain just where today’s birds come from. revolutionised our understanding of avian evolution. How did birds evolve? Over the course of 150 million years, and vaned feathers – with a stiff central Neornithes) did not become diverse and birds have evolved from a single common shaft and hooked hair-like barbules – just widespread until after the end-Cretaceous ancestor to the 10,000 species alive today. like modern birds. (K-Pg) mass extinction. Recent work But what is the evolutionary origin of this We now know that birds belong to a using genomic data has revealed diversity? This remained one of the most group of dinosaurs called the theropods, two remarkable (and controversial) fiercely debated questions in evolutionary which includes the giant Tyrannosaurus insights. First, the majority of bird biology for decades and only reached a and the diminutive Velociraptor (famous orders originated after the K-Pg mass scientific consensus in the 1990’s – not all for their oversized appearance in the first extinction. Second, the early branches of dinosaurs were wiped out during the mass Jurassic Park film). Vaned feathers appear the Neornithe tree of life may not have extinction at the end of the Cretaceous in the theropod group Maniraptora and followed a ‘bifurcating’ pattern where period, 65 million years ago. Some wings in the Paraves (Fig 1). Exactly each branch splits into two. Instead, the survived, and these are birds. which fossil represents the earliest bird is early expansion of non-passerine bird The discovery of Archaeopteryx in still debated but current evidence suggests orders was an explosion of evolution, with Germany in 1861 provided the first major that Archaeopteryx was a true bird and up to eight major groups emerging in the clue. Archaeopteryx had bird-like features, the earliest known representative of the geological blink of an eye. The reasons such as wings and feathers, alongside taxonomic class Aves, dating the origin for this explosive expansion are uncertain other distinctly non-avian features; a bony of birds to the mid-late Jurassic period but their emergence in a rapidly changing tail, forelimb claws (seen today only in (165‒150 million years ago). world following widespread extinction juvenile Hoatzin) and teeth. In the late- Numerous bird groups appeared may have allowed birds to exploit and 1990s thousands of fossils from the early and went extinct in the Jurassic and adapt to previously inaccessible resources. Cretaceous (130‒120 million years ago) Cretaceous periods. Two groups, the Over the next 65 million years, birds were discovered in north-eastern China, toothed, flying Enantiornithines and became the most successful group of providing compelling evidence of the the large, mostly flightless, diving terrestrial vertebrates, spreading across transition from dinosaurs to birds. These Hesperornithiformes, lived throughout the globe and becoming more species rich PHOTOGRAPHS: BLICKWINKEL/ALAMY, MARK CARWARDINE/NATUREPL.COM MARK BLICKWINKEL/ALAMY, PHOTOGRAPHS: HAWTIN (NIGELHAWTIN.COM) INFOGRAPHICS: NIGEL remarkably complete fossils have wings the Cretaceous. Modern birds (the than mammals, amphibians and reptiles. 16 BTO NEWS | Winter 2016 Ornithological masterclass EVOLUTION Rate of diversification Low High Ostriches and kiwis Water and landfowl Ornithischians Hummingbirds, Sauropods swifts and nightjars Tyrannosaurus Cuckoos, bustards and pigeons Oviraptorosauria Cranes Theropoda Dromaeosauridae Diving, wading Troodontidae Maniraptora and shorebirds Archaeopteryx Paraves Hawks Jeholornis Owls Confuciusornithiformes Aves Kingfishers, Sapeornis bee-eaters and rollers Enantiornithes Falcons Parrots Vorona Hesperornithiformes Ichthyornis Neornithes Songbirds, including Triassic tits, crows, thrushes, Jurassic Neogene Quaternary Palaeogene Cretaceous flycatchers and finches 250 200 150 100 50 0 Million years ago FIG 1: THE TREE OF LIFE OF BIRDS Pittas, antbirds, Birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs and ovenbirds and tyrants the number of species expanded rapidly after the K-Pg mass extinction. The Neornithes tree shows the diversity of major groups (relative size Cretaceous Palaeogene Neogene Quaternary 80 60 40 20 0 of triangles) and those groups that form new Million years ago species fastest (dark red colours). Conserving bird evolutionary diversity The evolutionary tree of life contains a wealth of information beyond the relationships among species. For instance, we can identify which species have few close relatives and evolved long ago. If these species became extinct, we would lose a disproportionately large amount of evolutionary history that can never be recovered. Some researchers have suggested that preserving species that represent unique parts of the tree is critical. Sadly, with limited funding it is often necessary to make pragmatic decisions about which species to prioritise for conservation action. By putting the most at-risk species first, and then ranking species according to the amount of evolutionary history that they represent, we can identify species that are on the ‘EDGE’ (Evolutionary Distinct, Globally Endangered). The top five ranked species are as diverse as they are unique: Giant Ibis, New Caledonian Owlet-nightjar, California Condor, Kakapo and Kagu. Until recently, the idea of ▲ New Zealand's combining evolutionary history with threat status was largely critically endangered confined to the pages of academic journals, but we are finally Kakapo had a known seeing real-world applications, most notably through the adult population of 123 Zoological Society of London’s EDGE of Existence initiative. individuals in June 2016. BTO NEWS | Winter 2016 17 The global diversity of birds Today, the diversity of birds is far from the distribution of birds globally. Around Wrens: adaptation equally distributed. Some groups have 250 species breed in Britain, an area of expanded spectacularly, like the passerines 244,000 km2. This compares to roughly in action with almost 6,000 species, whereas 1,500 species in Ecuador (284,000 km2). others, like the Hoatzin and Oilbird Species numbers peak in the Tropics, but Data from ringing and the Breeding Bird are evolutionary oddities with few close what causes this variation? Since birds Survey show how tiny Wrens are locally relatives. A long-standing question is first evolved, the Earth’s tectonic plates adapted to the differences in the Great whether species rich groups are older have moved and continental landmasses British climate. Wrens in Scotland are than groups that are species poor. The have shifted, but the regions that form larger and can store more body fat than underlying idea is simple: all else being the Tropics today have been climatically those further south, making them better equal, a group that arose 100 million stable, while temperate and Polar regions able to withstand cold weather. Whether years ago should contain more speices have experienced many changes. This has Wrens’ rate of evolutionary adaptation is than one that arose only 10 million years led to the suggestion that species have able to keep pace with the rate of climate ago. However, the evidence points to an steadily accumulated in the Tropics over change remains to be seen. alternative explanation – some groups are millions of years – species originate and www.bto.org/wrens-adapt predisposed to give rise to new species themselves give rise to new species with at faster rates than others. The diversity little impact of climate-driven extinctions, of different major bird groups is closely whereas similar species accumulation in related to the rate at which new species temperate and Polar regions could be u Wren body mass varied originate. In some groups, new species tempered by extinction due to climatic by around 5% form at remarkably high rates – like volatility. It has also been suggested that between the songbirds – whereas in others the rates speciation rates are higher in the Tropics, warmest and are slow. Much current research is focused but for birds there is little evidence of this. coldest regions. on measuring how fast species arise (the In fact, speciation rates seem to be highest speciation rate) in an effort to tease apart on average across much of the New World why this varies so much. (North and South America) and on many Just as the distribution of species in islands, but lower in the Old World PHOTOGRAPHS: ALLAN DREWITT/BTO PHOTOGRAPHS: major bird groups is uneven, so too is (Europe, Africa, Asia). FIG 2: GLOBAL MAP OF THE DIVERSITY OF THE WORLD’S BIRDS Species per 10 km2 Species richness peaks in the Amazon forest of South America and in tropical mountain ranges. Insufficient 100 200 300 400 500 data 500 400 300 Number of species 200 100 Source: Based on distribution data from BirdLife International and NatureServe 2015. 18 BTO NEWS | Winter 2016 Ornithological masterclass EVOLUTION How do bird species multiply? A species is defined as populations whose members and adapting to their respective habitats. Over time, The authors can interbreed with one another. So how does changes in behaviour and appearance accumulate to Chris Cooney is a one species split into two? Islands provide natural the point where individuals from each population postdoctoral researcher at experiments – ‘laboratories of evolution’ – that offer do not mate if they come back into contact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flying Dromaeosaurs
    A winged, but flightless, Deinonychus by Stephen A. Czerkas FLYING DROMAEOSAURS Stephen A. Czerkas, Dianshuang Zhang, Jinglu Li and Yinxian Li The Dinosaur Museum, 754 South 200 West, Blanding, Utah 84511, USA; Liaoning Provincial Bureau of Land Resources Management, Liaoning Fossil Administration Office, and Liaoning Museum of Paleontology, Left of Nanshan Park, Beipiao, Liaoning Province 122100, People’s Republic of China. The Dinosaur Museum © 2002 Abstract Dromaeosaurs have been regarded as theropod dinosaurs that were among the closest avian ancestors which were strictly terrestrial having not yet evolved the ability to fly. Consequently, phylogenetic analyses have resulted in the claims of birds having evolved from “the ground up” within a dinosaurian ancestry. Though widely accepted, the relationship between birds and dinosaurs has remained highly controversial and disputed by advocates of birds as having been derived from an arboreal, non-dinosaurian type of archosaur. The cladistical interpretation of the dinosaur/bird relationship hinges upon the presumption of the dromaeosaurs inability to fly. Recent discoveries of dromaeosaurs have revealed impressions of feathers and avian characters in the skeleton that nearly equal and even surpass that of Archaeopteryx. Yet despite this, the ability to fly has been discounted due to the shorter length of the forelimbs. Described below are two such dromaeosaurs, but preserved with impressions of primary flight feathers extending from the manus which demonstrate an undeniable correlation towards the ability to fly. This compelling evidence refutes the popular interpretation of birds evolving from dinosaurs by revealing that dromaeosaurs were already birds and not the non-avian theropod dinosaurs as previously believed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chinese Archaeopterygian, Protarchaeopteryx Gen. Nov
    A Chinese archaeopterygian, Protarchaeopteryx gen. nov. by Qiang Ji and Shu’an Ji Geological Science and Technology (Di Zhi Ke Ji) Volume 238 1997 pp. 38-41 Translated By Will Downs Bilby Research Center Northern Arizona University January, 2001 Introduction* The discoveries of Confuciusornis (Hou and Zhou, 1995; Hou et al, 1995) and Sinornis (Ji and Ji, 1996) have profoundly stimulated ornithologists’ interest globally in the Beipiao region of western Liaoning Province. They have also regenerated optimism toward solving questions of avian origins. In December 1996, the Chinese Geological Museum collected a primitive bird specimen at Beipiao that is comparable to Archaeopteryx (Wellnhofer, 1992). The specimen was excavated from a marl 5.5 m above the sediments that produce Sinornithosaurus and 8-9 m below the sediments that produce Confuciusornis. This is the first documentation of an archaeopterygian outside Germany. As a result, this discovery not only establishes western Liaoning Province as a center of avian origins and evolution, it provides conclusive evidence for the theory that avian evolution occurred in four phases. Specimen description Class Aves Linnaeus, 1758 Subclass Sauriurae Haeckel, 1866 Order Archaeopterygiformes Furbringer, 1888 Family Archaeopterygidae Huxley, 1872 Genus Protarchaeopteryx gen. nov. Genus etymology: Acknowledges that the specimen possesses characters more primitive than those of Archaeopteryx. Diagnosis: A primitive archaeopterygian with claviform and unserrated dentition. Sternum is thin and flat, tail is long, and forelimb resembles Archaeopteryx in morphology with three talons, the second of which is enlarged. Ilium is large and elongated, pubes are robust and distally fused, hind limb is long and robust with digit I reduced and dorsally migrated to lie in opposition to digit III and forming a grasping apparatus.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Anatomy of Mu50phagidae (Turacos)
    Comparative Anatomy of MU50phagidae (Turacos) by Georgann B. Johnston Sacramento, CA Introduction proVides the red colored feathers in he 20 species which comprise species of the first two genera. Both the avian order Musophagidae' pigments contain copper and spectral (commonly called turacos) data demonstrates that the former is have a number of physical and likely an oxidized version of the latter. anatomical characteristics that set them swered and many generalizations sus­ (Dyck, 1992) In fact, the two pigments apaI1 from many other birds. While pect in light of new information about are intermingled within individual uniformity among the 20 species is not these species' ecology including feathers in the breast patches and crests complete, ceI1ain generalizations can behavior and diet. of some species and turacoverdin be made. One ofthese is that the sexes occurs only in the presence of turacin. are visually indistinguishable in all of Feathers Other species outside the the species save C. Jeucogaster, in Probably the most distinguishing fea­ Musophagidae order have turacoverdin which the males have a black beak ture of these birds are two unique pig­ pigment, including Ithaginis (pheasant) and the females a green beak. ments deposited in their feather keratin. and Rollolus (paI1ridge), both members Unfortunately, most of the literature One, turacoverdin, is a green pigment of the Galliformes. An additional inter­ regarding the anatomy of these birds found in the rami in all species of esting note is that both pigments are was developed more than 40 years Tauraco and Musophaga, and in soluble in a weak base - which may ago, leaving many questions unan- Corythaeola cristata.
    [Show full text]
  • 6-A John James Audubon, American Flamingo, 1838
    JOHN JAMES AUDUBON [1785–1851] 6 a American Flamingo,1838 American Flamingo is one of the 435 hand-colored engravings that River, a major flyway for migratory birds, and eventually wan- make up John James Audubon’s monumental Birds of America, dered farther from home to comb the American frontier for issued in four volumes between 1826 and 1838. The massive unrecorded species. publication includes life-size representations of nearly five hundred Audubon’s procedure was to study and sketch a bird in its natural species of North American birds. Although Audubon was not the habitat before killing it carefully, using fine shot to minimize dam- first to attempt such a comprehensive catalog, his work departed age. His critical innovation was to then thread wire through the from conventional scientific illustration, which showed lifeless spec- specimen, allowing him to fashion a lifelike pose. He worked in imens against a blank background, by presenting the birds as they watercolor, and had completed some four hundred paintings appeared in the wild. When his pictures were first published, when he decided to publish them as a folio of prints. Failing to find some naturalists objected to Audubon’s use of dramatic action and support in Philadelphia, he sailed for England, where he became pictorial design, but these are the qualities that set his work apart lionized as “The American Woodsman.” The engraving firm and make it not only an invaluable record of early American Robert Havell and Son took on the challenge of reproducing wildlife but an unmatched work of American art. Audubon’s paintings on copper plates and tinting the resulting John James Audubon was born in Haiti and educated in France, black-and-white prints by hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Psittacine Beak and Feather Disease (Or Psittacine Circovirus, PCV)
    Psittacine beak and feather disease (or psittacine circovirus, PCV) Published by The recent diagnosis of psittacine beak and feather disease in wild Biosecurity Unit parrots is a cause of concern to the Department of Conservation. It Department of Conservation was diagnosed in a wild eastern rosella in the Wellington region in PO Box 12–416 Wellington, New Zealand August 2003. This disease is caused by a highly infectious virus and April 2004 affects the skin, feathers and immune system of parrots. There is po- tential for the disease to be transmitted to other wild parrots, in par- ticular New Zealand’s native species, such as the endangered kakapo and kaka. The potential impact of this disease on these spe- cies is unknown as it has affected parrot species in other countries in unpredictable patterns. However, the disease, also known as psit- tacine circovirus (PCV), could decimate the already depleted populations of our treasured native parrots and it therefore repre- sents a significant threat to biodiversity. What is psittacine beak and What happens if birds are feather disease? infected with this disease? Psittacine beak and feather disease Three forms of the disease exist: per- (also known as psittacine circovirus, acute (very sudden onset), acute (sud- PCV) is a highly infectious viral dis- den onset) and chronic (long term). ease of parrots that can cause high ju- The peracute form affects neonatal venile mortality, or long-term immu- (baby) parrots and causes septicae- Parrot infected with psittacine nological suppression, feather abnor- mia, pneumonia, enteritis (inflam- beak and feather disease. Photograph: Mary Wagner malities and (in cockatoos) beak rot.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pliocene Flamingo from Mexico
    June, 1944 THE WILSON BULLETIN 77 Vol. 56. No. 2 A PLIOCENE FLAMINGO FROM MEXICO BY LOYE MILLER IELD parties from the California Institute of Technology have been F fortunate in locating a variety of fossil deposits in Mexico that in- cluded bird remains. Some have been very rich in the quantity and variety of material; for example, the San Josecito Cavern of Nuevo Leon (Miller, ,1943), a deposit of Pleistocene age, yielded several thousand bird bones assigned to over forty species. The present paper deals with a collection of ten fragments, all but one of which are in- cluded in a single species. I am indebted to Dr. Chester Stock in charge of the explorations for the opportunity of working with the bird collec- tions. Dr. Alexander Wetmore has loaned comparative material, and Dr. Hildegarde Howard has been a most congenial fellow student during many conferences on the flamingoes, both Recent and Fossil. To these several colleagues my sincere thanks are offered. The ten fragments are from collecting locality No. 289, California Institute of Technology, known. as the Rincon Pliocene, Chihuahua, Mexico. Associated mammal remains include horse, camel, antelope, and carnivore species. The matrix is a fine grained silt of lightest color, without cementing material. A stiff brush serves to remove it from the well petrified bones. Unfortunately the specimens are most frag- mentary. They do, however, prove to be of interest in several respects; most notably they prove (since several speciments are from pre-volant young) that a small speciesof flamingo was present as a breeding bird. This is the earliest record for the family in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Beak and Feather Disease Viru
    Fact sheet Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) is the causative agent of psittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD), an endemic disease in Australia’s wild parrot populations. Descriptions of parrots with feather loss consistent with the disease date back to the late 1800s (Ashby 1907). The virus is believed to have originated in Australia sometime following the separation of the continent from Gondwanaland, with spread to other parts of the world with modern movement of parrots as pet and aviary species . It has the potential to impact on several endangered Australian and non-Australian parrot populations and is listed as a key threatening process by the Australian government. Of late, the virus also has been identified in various non-psittacine species . Beak and feather disease virus is a 14 to 16 nm non-enveloped icosahedral DNA virus belonging to the family Circoviridae. Formerly, it was believed that the circoviruses recovered from a diverse range of psittacines were all antigenically similar. Doubt was cast on this theory when a virus that appeared to be serologically and genetically different was isolated from cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) (Shearer et al. 2008). More recent research appears to indicate that psittacine circoviruses can be divided into two species and multiple viral strains. Based on work by Varsani et al. (2011), BFDV contains 14 strains, while budgerigar circovirus (BCV), a newly defined species to date only found in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates), contains three strains. However, it is likely that this number will continue to increase as shown by the discovery of two new distinct BFDV lineages in orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster) (Peters et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Attracting Hummingbirds to Your Garden Using Native Plants
    United States Department of Agriculture Attracting Hummingbirds to Your Garden Using Native Plants Black-chinned Hummingbird feeding on mountain larkspur, fireweed, and wild bergamot (clockwise from top) Forest National Publication April Service Headquarters Number FS-1046 2015 Hummingbird garden guide Many of us enjoy the beauty of flowers in our backyard and community gardens. Growing native plants adds important habitat for hummingbirds and other wildlife—especially pollinators. Even small backyard gardens can make a difference. Gardening connects us to nature and helps us better understand how nature works. This guide will help you create a hummingbird- What do hummingbirds, friendly garden. butterflies, and bees have in common? They all pollinate flowering plants. Broad-tailed Hummingbird feeding on scarlet gilia Hummingbirds are Why use native plants in restricted to the Americas with more your garden? than 325 species of Hummingbirds have evolved with hummingbirds in North, Central, and native plants, which are best adapted South America. to local growing seasons, climate, and soil. They prefer large, tubular flowers that are often (but not always) red in color. In this guide, we feature seven hummingbirds that breed in the United States. For each one, we also highlight two native plants found in its breeding range. These native plants are easy to grow, need little water once established, and offer hummingbirds abundant nectar. 2 Hummingbirds and pollination Ruby-throated Hummingbird feeding on the At rest, a hummer’s nectar and pollen heart beats an of blueberry flowers average of 480 beats per minute. On cold nights, it goes into What is pollination? torpor (hibernation- like state), and its Pollination is the process of moving pollen heart rate drops to (male gamete) from one flower to the ovary of another 45 to 180 beats per minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Describing Hummingbird-Sized Dinosaur Retracted 24 July 2020, by Bob Yirka
    Paper describing hummingbird-sized dinosaur retracted 24 July 2020, by Bob Yirka teeth. Some in the field were so sure that it was a lizard and not a dinosaur that they wrote and uploaded a paper to the bioRxiv preprint server outlining their concerns. The authors of the paper then published a response addressing their concerns and refuting the skeptics' arguments. That was followed by another team reporting that they had found a similar fossil and after studying it, had deemed it to be a lizard. In reviewing both the paper and the evidence presented by others in the field, the editors at Nature chose to retract the paper. A CT scan of the skull of Oculudentavis by LI Gang, The researchers who published the original paper Oculudentavis means eye-tooth-bird, so named for its appear to be divided on their assessment of the distinctive features. Credit: Lars Schmitz retraction, with some insisting there was no reason for the paper to be retracted and others acknowledging that they had made a mistake when they classified their find as a dinosaur. In either The journal Nature has issued a retraction for a case, all of the researchers agree that the work paper it published March 11th called they did on the fossil was valid and thus the paper "Hummingbird-sized dinosaur from the Cretaceous could be used as a source by others in the future—it period of Myanmar." The editorial staff was alerted is only the classification of the find that has been to a possible misclassification of the fossil put in doubt.
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan Conservation Seabird Pacific Region U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Seabird Conservation Plan—Pacific Region 120 0’0"E 140 0’0"E 160 0’0"E 180 0’0" 160 0’0"W 140 0’0"W 120 0’0"W 100 0’0"W RUSSIA CANADA 0’0"N 0’0"N 50 50 WA CHINA US Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Region OR ID AN NV JAP CA H A 0’0"N I W 0’0"N 30 S A 30 N L I ort I Main Hawaiian Islands Commonwealth of the hwe A stern A (see inset below) Northern Mariana Islands Haw N aiian Isla D N nds S P a c i f i c Wake Atoll S ND ANA O c e a n LA RI IS Johnston Atoll MA Guam L I 0’0"N 0’0"N N 10 10 Kingman Reef E Palmyra Atoll I S 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W L Howland Island Equator A M a i n H a w a i i a n I s l a n d s Baker Island Jarvis N P H O E N I X D IN D Island Kauai S 0’0"N ONE 0’0"N I S L A N D S 22 SI 22 A PAPUA NEW Niihau Oahu GUINEA Molokai Maui 0’0"S Lanai 0’0"S 10 AMERICAN P a c i f i c 10 Kahoolawe SAMOA O c e a n Hawaii 0’0"N 0’0"N 20 FIJI 20 AUSTRALIA 0 200 Miles 0 2,000 ES - OTS/FR Miles September 2003 160 0’0"W 158 0’0"W 156 0’0"W (800) 244-WILD http://www.fws.gov Information U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Bird Feeding
    BirdNotes 1 Winter Bird Feeding birds at feeders in winter If you feed birds, you’re in good company. Birding is one of North America’s favorite pastimes. A 2006 report from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates that about 55.5 mil- lion Americans provide food for wild birds. Chickadees Titmice Cardinals Sparrows Wood- Orioles Pigeons Nuthatches Finches Grosbeaks Blackbirds Jays peckers Tanagers Doves Sunflower ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ Safflower ◆ ◆ ◆ Corn ◆ ◆ ◆ Millet ◆ ◆ ◆ Milo ◆ ◆ Nyjer ◆ Suet ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ ◆ Preferred ◆ Readily Eaten Wintertime—and the Living’s counting birds at their feeders during selecting the best foods daunting. To Not Easy this winterlong survey. Great Back- attract a diversity of birds, provide a yard Bird Count participants provide variety of food types. But that doesn’t n much of North America, winter valuable data with a much shorter mean you need to purchase one of ev- Iis a difficult time for birds. Days time commitment—as little as fifteen erything on the shelf. are often windy and cold; nights are minutes in mid-February! long and even colder. Lush vegeta- Which Seed Types tion has withered or been consumed, Types of Bird Food Should I Provide? and most insects have died or become uring spring and summer, most dormant. Finding food can be espe- lack-oil sunflower seeds attract songbirds eat insects and spi- cially challenging for birds after a D Bthe greatest number of species. ders, which are highly nutritious, heavy snowfall. These seeds have a high meat-to- abundant, and for the most part, eas- shell ratio, they are nutritious and Setting up a backyard feeder makes ily captured.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]