590 Nutrient Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

590 Nutrient Management 590 - 1 NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT (Ac.) CODE 590 DEFINITION • municipal and industrial biosolids and other organic by-products Managing the amount (rate), source, placement • compost (method of application), and timing of plant • waste water nutrients and soil amendments. • organic matter and soil nutrient availability • removal of crop materials • irrigation water. PURPOSE • To budget, supply, and conserve nutrients for Documents cited in this standard may be plant production. periodically updated or replaced. Use the most recent version available. Find additional • To minimize agricultural nonpoint source technical information on nutrient management at pollution of surface and groundwater www.agronext.iastate.edu/soilfertility. resources. • To properly utilize manure, municipal and Soil Sampling, Testing, and Analysis industrial biosolids, and other organic by- Base the nutrient management plan on soil test products as plant nutrient sources. results for, at a minimum, organic matter, phosphorus (P), potassium (K), pH, and buffer • To protect air quality by reducing odors, pH. Test, at a minimum, every 4 years of row nitrogen emissions (ammonia, oxides of crops or once during an extended rotation which nitrogen), and the formation of atmospheric includes perennial crops. For initial plans use particulates. tests no older than 2 years and account for • To maintain or improve the physical, chemical, nutrients applied at rates in excess of crop and biological condition of soil. replacement since the last soil test. Use Iowa State University’s (ISU) PM-287 “Take CONDITIONS WHERE PRACTICE APPLIES a Good Soil Sample to Help Make Good Decisions” for soil testing guidance. For variable This practice applies to all lands where plant rate systems use NCMR-348 “Soil Sampling for nutrients and soil amendments are applied. Variable Rate Fertilizer and Lime Application” for additional guidance. CRITERIA For soil analysis, use a lab that is certified by the General Criteria Applicable to All Purposes Iowa Soil Testing Laboratory Certification Develop a nutrient management plan for Program, Commercial Feed and Fertilizer nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium that Bureau of the Iowa Department of Agriculture considers the crop requirements and all potential and Land Stewardship (IDALS). sources of nutrients including, but not limited to: • commercial fertilizer To interpret the soil test results, use PM-1688 • animal manure “General Guide for Crop Nutrient and Limestone • legume credits and green manure, Recommendations in Iowa” and PM-1310 • crop rotation “Interpretations of Soil Test Results.” Conservation practice standards are reviewed periodically and updated if needed. To obtain the NRCS, IA current version of this standard, see the Iowa Natural Resources Conservation Service website or your county Field Office Technical Guide. October 2013 590 - 2 The 4Rs “Adaptive Nutrient Management Process”. The Consider the 4Rs of nutrient management – corn stalk test provides post season feedback apply the Right nutrient source at the Right rate on nutrient management that can be used to at the Right time in the Right place – to improve adjust the nutrient source, rate, timing, and/or nutrient use efficiency by the crop and to placement. Document how results will be minimize nutrient losses to the surface and reviewed and incorporated into future groundwater and to the atmosphere. management. Nutrient Application Rates Phosphorus and Potassium Application Rates Determine the nutrient application rate to: For P2O5 and K2O requirements for most • Meet the crop’s nutrient requirements for common crops, use soil test results and PM- production 1688 “General Guide for Crop Nutrient and • Account for nutrient credits and rotational Limestone Recommendations in Iowa”. Use PM- effects 869 “Fertilizing Pasture” for pasture nutrient • Account for removal of crop materials requirements. Express phosphorus and • Conserve resources as indicated by the potassium nutrient values in pounds of P2O5 and erosion and nutrient risk assessments, and K2O. • Integrate the management of manure, municipal and industrial biosolids, and other P2O5 and K2O can be managed annually or for waste products as crop nutrients. multiple years. Sum the nutrient requirements for all the crops in the years planned (i.e. a Plan to meet the crop nutrient requirements for rotation) and apply once or split as convenient. nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and other nutrients according to Iowa State University Phosphorus and potassium application rates recommendations. may exceed the crop’s nutrient requirements when manure, municipal and industrial biosolids, Nitrogen Application Rates and other organic by-products are applied based To determine nitrogen rates for corn in a on the N rate or need to be disposed. See continuous corn or corn-soybean rotation, use Additional Criteria Applicable to Properly Utilize ISU’s Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator or use PM- Manure Municipal and Industrial Biosolids, and 1714 “Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for Other Organic By-Products as a Plant Nutrient Corn in Iowa.” Source for management criteria. For within season sampling to determine Realistic Yield Potential sidedress nitrogen application rates, follow ISU Estimate the field's realistic yield potential using: procedures for the late-spring soil nitrate test in • an average of two or more years of field yield PM-1714 or leaf chlorophyll values in PM-2026 data using producer records plus 10%, or “Sensing Nitrogen Stress in Corn.” • the crop yield estimate for the dominant soil in the field as found in the Field Office For additional nitrogen rate information and Technical Guide, or recommendations use ISU publications: • PM-1268 “Establishing Realistic Yields" (1986) • PM-2015 “Concepts and rationale for regional to calculate a more precise estimate if nitrogen rate guidelines for corn”, desired. • PM-1714 “Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn in Iowa”, Nutrient Credits • PM-869 “Fertilizing Pasture”, To determine the nutrient application rate • PM-1584 “Cornstalk Testing to Evaluate subtract the nutrient credits for legumes, Nitrogen Management”, manure, municipal and industrial biosolids, • PM-2026 “Sensing nitrogen stress in corn”. and/or other organic sources from the crop's nutrient requirements. Note that ISU nitrogen Use of the end-of-season cornstalk test recommendations already accounts for the especially in conjunction with on-farm field trials rotational effects and legume credit for corn is encouraged to evaluate the nitrogen following soybeans. management program. See ISU publication PM- 1584 “Corn Stalk Test to Determine Nitrogen” Legume credits can be found in ISU Publication and NRCS Agronomy Technical Note No. 7, PM-1714 “Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations NRCS, IA October 2013 590 - 3 for Corn in Iowa". Use PMR-1003 "Using • For nitrogen, timing and placement should manure nutrients for crop production" to correspond as closely as practical with crop determine the 2nd and 3rd year manure credits. uptake. • For phosphorus avoid surface application when Other Rate Criteria the runoff potential is high. Account for all applied nutrients including starter, • For anhydrous ammonia, to avoid losses in-furrow starter (pop-up), biosolids, and the N in during application apply when soil moisture MAP and DAP. conditions are conducive to proper injection and sealing. Consider the impact on yield of poor soil quality, drainage, pH, weather, and other factors that Fall versus Spring Application influence production, as well as the source, Corn nitrogen rate guidelines for Iowa (see the timing, and placement of nutrients before Corn Nitrogen Rate Calculator website for rates concluding that nutrients are deficient. and PM-2015 “Concepts and Rationale for Regional Nitrogen Rate Guidelines for Corn” for Nutrients and lime may be applied at lower-than- an explanation of the method) are based on recommended rates if the grower’s objectives spring or sidedress N application research trials. are met. In comparison to fall application, spring N application improves crop uptake efficiency and For crops without specific ISU guidance, base reduces the loss of nitrate. Fall application nutrient application rates on university increases the risk for nitrogen loss and reduces recommendations from neighboring states nitrogen use efficiency. However, with some and/or plant nutrient removal. manure and biosolid sources, such as bedded manure, fall application increases the Nutrient Sources mineralization of organic N and improves early Use nutrient sources compatible with the season N supply. application timing, tillage and planting system, soil properties, crop, crop rotation, soil organic In general, plan to apply N in the spring for most content, and local climate to minimize risk to the nutrient sources. If for logistical or other reasons environment. N is fall applied – such as anhydrous ammonia, + manure in which > 20 lbs/acre NH4 -N is Use fertilizers which have been verified by applied, or MAP/DAP – plan to apply late in the IDALS Feed and Fertilizer Bureau to contain the fall when the mid-day soil temperature, at 4” soil nutrients claimed on the label. For Enhanced depth, is below 50⁰F and trending colder. The Efficiency fertilizer products use the Association actual application timing may occasionally vary of American Plant Food Control Officials due to fall weather, the weather forecast, soil definitions for these products.
Recommended publications
  • Housed Livestock, Manure Storage, Manure Processing Draft Section for a Guidance Document
    Housed livestock, manure storage, manure processing Draft section for a Guidance Document Prepared by Barbara Amon and Lars Stoumann Jensen (session chairs) For discussion at the workshop on integrated sustainable nitrogen management, Brussels 30 September – 1 October 2019 This draft chapter to a planned Guidance Document on integrated sustainable nitrogen management has been prepared for the Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen under the UNECE Air Convention, with support from the European Commission. The process of drafting the Guidance Document started in connection to a workshop “Towards joined-up nitrogen guidance for air, water and climate co-benefits”, hosted in Brussels, 11-12 October 2016. The current chapter draft is based on the results from that workshop and on discussions and developments since then. It will be presented and discussed in Brussels on 30 September – 1 October at a second workshop jointly organised by the Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen and the European Commission. The content of the draft paper reflects the views only of the authors and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information. 2 Housed livestock, manure storage, manure processing 1. Introduction and background 2. Why do we have emissions and how can they be influenced – the basics behind emission processes Nitrogen can take various forms (Fig. 1). Reactive nitrogen (Nr) includes all forms of nitrogen that are biologically, photochemically, and radiatively active. Compounds of nitrogen that are - - reactive include the following: nitrous oxide (N2O), nitrate (NO3 ), nitrite (NO2 ), ammonia + (NH3), and ammonium (NH4 ). Reactive forms of nitrogen are those capable of cascading through the environment and causing an impact through smog, acid rain, biodiversity loss, etc.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Potassium for Organic Crop Production by Robert Mikkelsen an Adequate K Supply Is Essential for Both Organic and Conventional Crop Production
    NORTH AMERICA Managing Potassium for Organic Crop Production By Robert Mikkelsen An adequate K supply is essential for both organic and conventional crop production. Potas- sium is involved in many plant physiological reactions, including osmoregulation, protein synthesis, enzyme activation, and photosynthate translocation. The K balance on many farms is negative, where more K is removed in harvested crops than is returned again to the soil. An overview of commonly used K fertilizers for organic production is provided. otassium is an essential nutrient for plant growth, but it often receives less attention than N and P in many crop Pproduction systems. Many regions of the U.S.A. and all of the Canadian provinces remove more K during harvest than is returned to the soil in fertilizer and manure (Figure 1). In the U.S.A., an average of only 3 units of K is replaced as fertilizer and manure for every 4 units of K removed in crops, resulting in a depletion of nutrients from the soil and increasing occur- rences of deficiency in many places. Potassium is the soil cation required in the largest amount by plants, regardless of nutrient management philosophy. 1,400 Removal 1,200 Hay and forage crops can remove hundreds of pounds of K from the soil Manure each year, placing a heavy demand on soil resources. 1,000 Fertilizer Large amounts of K are required to maintain plant health 800 and vigor. Some specific roles of K in the plant include os- moregulation, internal cation/anion balance, enzyme activa- 600 tion, proper water relations, photosynthate translocation, and 400 protein synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 4. Nutrient Management for Water Quality
    SECTION FOUR NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY Many hobby farmers measure success by the abundance of their harvest of fruits and vegetables or their forage crops. This achievement can often be traced back to healthy soil and nutrient management practices. SOME HOBBY FARMERS ARE FORTUNATE TO HAVE SITES WITH A THICK LAYER OF FERTILE SOIL RICH IN MICROORGANISMS. HOWEVER, EVEN GOOD SOILS CAN BECOME NUTRIENT DEPLETED OR ERODE OVER TIME. REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU ARE GROWING, SOILS WILL GENERALLY NEED TO BE MANAGED TO RETURN NUTRIENTS INTO THE SOIL TO SUPPORT HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH. THE HOBBY FARMER SHOULD CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN DEVELOPING A HEALTHY SOILS MANAGEMENT PLAN: • Why does annual soil testing help save time and money? • What nutrients are needed for plant health? (Hint: It’s not just about nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium) • What’s the difference between fertilizers and soil amendments? Organic and synthetic? • How can you improve nutrient retention in your soil through crop rotation, succession planting, intercropping, and companion planting? • What are the best techniques to compost and to recycle and reuse materials you likely already have? • How should you apply fertilizers, manure, and soil amendments for best results? While nutrients are an essential component of many natural environments, an overabundance in our surface water can cause a reduction in water quality. SECTION FOUR :: NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR WATER QUALITY Phosphorus and nitrogen from fertilizers can result in: • excessive aquatic plant growth choking waterways and making them impassable; • depletion of dissolved oxygen which is essential for fsh; and • creating an ideal environment for toxic algal blooms that can be a health threat to people and pets, often causing recreational areas to close.
    [Show full text]
  • Manure Management Factsheet
    INDIANA NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Helping People Help the Land. FACT SHEET Manure Management Properly managed manure can improve soil health, crop yields and reduce the risk of runoff to surface waters. June, 2014 Photo Source: IDEM NRCS works directly with farmers to manage NRCS ASSISTANCE Natural Resources manure as a valuable nutrient source in an BACKGROUND environmentally conscious manner. Properly NRCS helps farmers and landowners identify • Manure is a valuable fertilizer Conservation Service managed manure can improve soil health, natural resources concerns on their farm. containing varying amounts of nitrogen, crop yields, and reduce the risk of runoff to NRCS provides technical assistance at no cost phosphorus, potassium, micronutrients surface waters. to create a conservation plan and identify and organic matter, depending on conservation practices to address resource the livestock species and the manure MANURE MANAGEMENT concerns. handling and storage, as well as application methods. STANDARDS Practices may include nutrient application (590 standard) to address identified water quality • Manure is a cost-efficient form of Through a scientific planning process and or other concerns, or manure storage (313 and fertilizer for crops, that if managed and standards, NRCS works with farmers to 359 standards) to address an identified water applied correctly, can supply plant- address resource concerns on their farms. All quality, odor or other resource concern. nutrient needs and can enhance soil NRCS standards require
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Management and Imbalances David H
    98 Nutrient Management and Imbalances David H. Gent, J Robert Sirrine, and Heather M. Darby Hop plants produce abundant biomass in the form of bines, leaves, and cones. High- yielding plants such as hop require adequate nutrition. Many of the various nutrients required by hop may be deficient or in excess of the crop’s needs. It can be difficult to pinpoint the cause of abnormal plant symptoms, especially if multiple production factors lead to the same symptom. General symptoms associated with nutrient imbalances are described in this section, as well as known nutrient interactions with diseases and arthropod pests. Fertilization recommendations are beyond the scope of this pest management guide and are not provided. Recommendations vary widely in published literature, differing among production regions, varieties, irrigation methods, soil types, and production goals. Readers should seek input from local experts for guidance appropriate to their region and situation. Boron Iron Boron deficiency can result in delayed Iron deficiency is first observed on emergence of shoots; stunting, distortion, young leaves as yellowing between veins, and crinkling of young leaves (Fig. 257); while veins remain green (Fig. 260, right- and yellowing and death of shoot tips (Fig. hand image, and Fig. 261). Iron deficiency 258). Leaves of affected plants may be small is most common in alkaline soils, although and brittle, and may develop a fluffy-tipped it can be induced in highly acidic soils appearance due to impaired development (approximately pH 5.7 or less) because of lobes (Fig. 259). Deficiencies are most of enhanced solubility and uptake of common in acid and/or sandy textured soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land
    Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land Marc Ribaudo, Noel Gollehon, Marcel Aillery, Jonathan Kaplan, Robert Johansson, Jean Agapoff, Lee Christensen, Vince Breneman, and Mark Peters Chapter 1–Introduction Livestock and poultry manure can provide valuable sion affecting the potential for contamination of water organic material and nutrients for crop and pasture resources by manure nutrients (Mulla et al., 1999). growth. However, nutrients contained in animal manure can degrade water quality if they are over- Recent policies and programs for increasing the effi- applied to land and enter water resources through cient use of nutrients and protecting water quality from runoff or leaching. The nutrients of greatest water nutrient runoff all emphasize the importance of proper- quality concern are nitrogen and phosphorus. Animal ly handling animal manure. The Unified Strategy for waste is a source of both. Animal Feeding Operations, jointly developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the A shift in the livestock and poultry industry over the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1999, past several decades toward fewer, larger operations states: “Land application is the most common, and has prompted public concern over the use and disposal usually most desirable method of utilizing manure of animal manure. Manure lagoon spills in North because of the value of the nutrients and organic mat- Carolina and pfiesteria piscicida outbreaks in North ter. Land application should be planned to ensure that Carolina and Maryland have raised public concerns the proper amounts of all nutrients are applied in a about the way manure is stored and handled.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Manure and Compost As Nutrient Sources for Vegetable Crops
    Nutrient Management for Fruit & Vegetable Crop Production Carl J. Rosen and Peter M. Bierman Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota USING MANURE AND COMPOST AS NUTRIENT SOURCES FOR VEGETABLE CROPS Manure is a valuable fertilizer for any farming operation and has been used for centuries to supply needed nutrients for crop growth. The use of manure has generally declined on many farms over the past 50 years due to: 1) Farm specialization with increasing separation of crop and livestock production, 2) Cost of transporting manure, which is a bulky, relatively low analysis nutrient source, and 3) Increased availability of high analysis synthetic fertilizers that usually provide a cheaper source per unit of nutrient than manure. Despite these limitations, manure (and other organic nutrient sources) produced on or near a vegetable farm provide many benefits and should be beneficially utilized whenever possible. Manure and compost not only supply many nutrients for crop production, including micronutrients, but they are also valuable sources of organic matter. Increasing soil organic matter improves soil structure or tilth, increases the water-holding capacity of coarse-textured sandy soils, improves drainage in fine-textured clay soils, provides a source of slow release nutrients, reduces wind and water erosion, and promotes growth of earthworms and other beneficial soil organisms. Most vegetable crops return small amounts of crop residue to the soil, so manure, compost, and other organic amendments help maintain soil organic matter levels. Proper use of manure and compost is essential from both a production and environmental standpoint. Applying rates that are too low can lead to nutrient deficiency and low yields.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Nutrition and IPM – with an Emphasis on Trees & Vines
    Plant Nutrition and IPM – with an emphasis on trees & vines Gregg Young, M.A. Certified Professional Agronomist Pest Control Advisor Sustainable Ag Expo San Luis Obispo, Ca. November 15, 2016 Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net 1 The Disease Triangle It takes all 3 components for disease to Pest / infect Pathogen Environmental Susceptible Conditions Host Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 2 www.qfirst.net The Disease Triangle It takes all 3 components for disease to Pest / infect Pathogen Environmental Susceptible Conditions Host Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 3 www.qfirst.net Often in IPM we spend our efforts monitoring the pest/disease and the environmental conditions Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net 4 All of the biomass that makes up a mature tree or vine comes from the soil, water & air Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net 5 Modern agriculture squeezes the most it can out of the agroecosystem Pears, Apples: 20+ tons/ac Tomatoes: 50+ tons/ac Grapes: 5-12 tons/ac Hay crops: 20+ tons/ac 6 Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net Crops need a biologically active, aerated root zone Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net 7 Drip irrigation – nutrient removal is from a smaller area; nutrient management is critical 8 Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net Early pioneers who called for attention to soil fertility in managing pests & diseases: • J.I. Rodale (1898-1971) "Healthy Soil = Healthy Food = Healthy People" • William Albrecht (1888-1974) “Food is fabricated fertility” 9 Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net 10 Gregg Young, CPAg 2016 www.qfirst.net Early Researchers: Nutrient-Pest & Disease Relations: • We may also speculate on the possibility of influencing the population development of these mites by enhancing their food substrate through managing the fertilization of the host plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Performance of Integrated Nutrient Management
    agronomy Article Comparative Performance of Integrated Nutrient Management between Composted Agricultural Wastes, Chemical Fertilizers, and Biofertilizers in Improving Soil Quantitative and Qualitative Properties and Crop Yields under Arid Conditions Nasser Al-Suhaibani 1, Mostafa Selim 2, Ali Alderfasi 1 and Salah El-Hendawy 1,3,* 1 Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, KSA, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] (N.A.-S.); [email protected] (A.A.) 2 Field Crops Research Department, Agricultural Division, National Research Centre, 33 Bohouth St., Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt; [email protected] 3 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +966-5-3531-8364 Received: 29 July 2020; Accepted: 1 October 2020; Published: 3 October 2020 Abstract: The primary goal of integrated nutrient management (INM) strategies is to substitute a portion of chemical fertilizers with a more sustainable and environmentally safe organic compost in order to mitigate soil degradation, improve crop production, and protect the environment. Therefore, the present study was conducted to assess the impacts of different INM practices, namely full-dose 1 1 NPK (T1), compost of cow manure at 5 t ha− (T2), compost of poultry manure at 5 t ha− (T3), 1 compost of mixed sheep and camel manure at 5 t ha− (T4), 50% NPK combined with the mixture 1 1 of the three types of composts at the rate of 5 t ha− (T5) or 10 t ha− (T6), and mixture of the three 1 1 1 types of composts at the rate of 10 t ha− (T7), 15 t ha− (T8), or 20 t ha− (T9) with or without biofertilizers for each treatment on several physiochemical and biological proprieties of soil and final grain yield of field crops after 2 years of field-scale experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Agricultural Waste Management Systems
    Part 651 Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook Chapter 9 Agricultural Waste Management Systems (210–VI–AWMFH, Amend. 47, December 2011) Chapter 9 Agricultural Waste Management Systems Part 651 Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook Issued December 2011 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all pro- grams.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for commu- nication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. (210–VI–AWMFH, Amend. 47, December 2011) Acknowledgments Chapter 9 was originally prepared and printed in 1992 under the direction of James N. Krider (retired), national environmental engineer, Soil Conser- vation Service (SCS), now Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). James D. Rickman (retired), environmental engineer, NRCS, Fort Worth, Texas, provided day-to-day coordination in the development of the hand- book. Authors for chapter 9 included L.M. “Mac” Safley, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; William H. Boyd, environmental engineer, Lincoln, Nebraska; A.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Nutrient Management - V.L
    MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL, FORESTRY, AND FISHERIES ENTERPRISES – Vol. I - Plant Nutrient Management - V.L. Bailey, L. Kryzanowski PLANT NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT V.L. Bailey and L. Kryzanowski Agronomy Unit, Alberta Agriculture Food, and Rural Development, Canada Keywords: Soil, fertilizer, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, crop uptake, crop removal, precision farming Contents 1. Introduction 2. Macronutrients for Crop Production 2.1. Nitrogen 2.2. Phosphorus 2.3. Potassium 2.4. Sulfur 3. Removal of Nutrients by Crops 3.1. Cereals 3.2. Forages 3.3. Legumes 3.4. Oilseeds 3.5. Root Crops 4. Replacement of Soil Nutrients 4.1. Nitrogen Fixation 4.2. Mycorrhiza 4.3. Organic Amendments 4.4. Commercial Fertilizers 4.5. Crop Rotation Management 5. Precision Farming 6. Future Concerns Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary UNESCO – EOLSS Plant nutrient management is critical to the sustainability of agricultural production systems. Nitrogen,SAMPLE phosphorus, potassium aCHAPTERSnd sulfur are the four macronutrients required for crop growth. In order to maintain agricultural sustainability, nutrients that are removed from the soil by crops must be replaced. Different crops have different nutrient demands and the proportion of nutrients taken up by the plant may not be the same as that exported. There are several methods of ensuring that soil nutrient replacement occurs. (1) Biological mechanisms—includes symbiotic associations of crops with specialized microorganisms, such as nitrogen fixers or mycorrhiza. (2) Return of nutrients to the soil as organic amendments such as crop residues, livestock manure, and other amendments. (3) Commercially produced inorganic fertilizers are the most widely used method to replace soil nutrients, and the wide variety of fertilizers ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL, FORESTRY, AND FISHERIES ENTERPRISES – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Nutrient Management of Organic and Bio-Fertilizer to Enhance Maize Production
    Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 2019, Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages: 334-340 J. Environ. Treat. Tech. ISSN: 2309-1185 Journal weblink: http://www.jett.dormaj.com Integrated Nutrient Management of Organic and Bio-Fertilizer to Enhance Maize Production Magda, H. Mohamed, Nabila, M. Zaki, M. S. Hassanein, Amal, G. Ahmed, and M. M. Tawfik Field Crops Research Dept., National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth st., 12622,Dokki, Giza, Egypt. Received: 12/04/2019 Accepted: 24/06/2019 Published: 01/12/2019 Abstract Integrated nutrient management (INM) is the concept of using a combination of organic, inorganic, and biological amendments to increase nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and reduce nutrient loss by synchronizing crop demand with nutrient availability in soil. In order to produce more food with limited space, farmers utilize several techniques. One of the best techniques is application of different types of organic and biofertilizers in soil in integrated nutrient management system and consequently maintain the soil nutrients level. It allows plant to grow, flourish, and keep the environment save. Importance of maize (Zea mays L.) crop is justified by its nutritious content especially because of the presence of high protein, minerals, vitamins and other energetic nutrients. In Egypt, maize production is insufficient, so various strategies have been developed to improve its production. In order to study the promoting effect of organic and biofertilizer on growth and yield of maize plant, a field experiment was conducted in Wadi El-Rayan, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt, during the two successive seasons of 2014 and 2015 to study the impact of organic or/and bio-fertilizer on growth, yield and its components and some chemical contents of two maize cultivars.
    [Show full text]