2019 LEGISLATIVE REPORT The 2019 legislative session was one of the longest in recent legislative history, lasting 95 days.

It was the first session for newly elected Governor and the legislature welcomed numerous new lawmakers from around the state. And with several contentious issues making their way through the House and Senate, it was a session full of several highs and many lows, public outcry, and the need to consistently hold lawmakers accountable to the will of their constituents.

As the session wrapped up on April 11, 2019, we’re happy to report that despite the obstacles the Legislature tried to place before us in protecting civil liberties, the ACLU defended another successful slate of legislative priorities aimed at ensuring the constitutional rights of all Idahoans was protected. We invite you to read more about our top victories for the year, and to check out our 2019 Legislative Scorecard where you can see how your elected officials voted on issues of priority for the ACLU. ©BoiseWeekly passed both houses and ultimately made it to Governor Little’s desk. VOTING In an interesting twist, the House sponsor of SB 1159, Rep. (R – 1, Ponderay) introduced a trailer bill, HB 296, to try and CRIMINAL JUSTICE RIGHTS soothe over public outcry on the original bill, Public Defense Commission Rules judicial discretion in sentencing. After emotional despite never engaging any of the organizations The Idaho Public Defense Commission (PDC) testimony in support of the bill during the opposed to the ballot initiative changes. The once again sent proposed rules to the legislature House Judiciary, Rules, and Administration proposed “fixes” to SB 1159 included changing aimed at improving our subpar, statewide public Committee hearing, HB 99 was ultimately the signature collection timeframe from six to defense system. The PDC has been actively voted out of committee and off the House floor nine months and the geographic distribution The most contentious issue that overtook the creating rules for the agency in response to to the Senate Judiciary and Rules Committee. requirements from 32 out of 35 legislative statehouse this year was the introduction of six – legislation enacted in 2015 that aimed to reform However – the bill ultimately died in the Senate districts to two-thirds of all districts. After yes SIX – bills all aimed at significantly reducing the broken public defense delivery system. This committee because the chair, Sen. blocking a public hearing on HB 296, the bill was the public’s access to the ballot initiative process year the PDC proposed new workload standards (R – 12, Nampa) refused to give the bill a hearing rushed through the legislative process and it too provided in our Federal and Idaho Constitutions. that begin to place restrictions on the number at the request of law enforcement agencies, ended up on the governor’s desk. Thankfully, on The most problematic bill was SB 1159, sponsored of cases a public defender can reasonably despite overwhelming public support for the bill. Friday, April 5, Governor Little issued a veto on by Sen. C. Scott Grow (R – 14, Eagle), that take during the year. However – the proposed While year three was not the lucky year we had SB 1159, which effectively killed HB 296 as well, would have placed several new restrictions on numerical standards were created with flawed intended, we are committed to working with citing legal concerns that if the bill became law, it how policy issues could be placed on the ballot data from an incomplete 2018 PDC workload our legislative champions to once again bring would subject the state to unnecessary lawsuits. through the signature petition process. The study and data from only one county - Ada sentencing reform to the . most problematic parts were the reduction of County - which does not reflect the practices of However – the House bill sponsor wasn’t done time provided to collect signatures – from 18 the state as a whole. The result? A rule that will attempting to revoke our access to the ballot months to six months, the increased signature perpetuate the already excessively high workload initiative process. No less than five hours after threshold – from six percent to ten percent of standards that many public defenders face, which Governor Little’s veto on SB 1159, notice was registered voters, and the geographic distribution in turn will result in continued violations of their circulated that Rep. Dixon intended to introduce requirement – from 18 legislative districts to client’s constitutional right to representation 60,000,000 dollars a new bill to circumvent the Governor’s veto. Yet, 32 (out of a possible 35). With the enhanced in court. Despite ongoing participation in the that could be reinvested in during the introductory hearing, he introduced geographic distribution requirement, we felt rulemaking process and educating lawmakers community treatment options not one, but FOUR new bills – essentially strongly that SB 1159 was unconstitutional about the constitutional problem inherent in the if mandatory minimum breaking down each of the components in because it violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s proposed rule, the House and Senate Judiciary sentences for drug related SB 1159 and HB 296 into four separate bills. Equal Protection provision regarding the “one and Rules Committee approved the workload However, only HB 303, requiring a fiscal note offenses were reformed person, one vote” principle. The key – in order standards, which are now in effect. to remain constitutionally sound in requiring and funding source to be included in the ballot initiative petition made it out of the House a geographic distribution requirement, each Mandatory Minimum Reform where it was killed promptly by the Senate, legislative district needed to be divided equally For the third year in a row, we partnered with which refused to grant the bill a public hearing among population numbers and registered our legislative bill sponsors Reps. or floor vote. Without a doubt, this was one of voters. However, according to public data from (D – 18, Boise) and (R – 33, the most prolonged battles of the 2019 session the Secretary of State’s website, we know Idaho Falls), the Idaho Association of Criminal that used secret meetings, uncommon procedural that there’s a large disparity between those Defense Lawyers and the Idaho Freedom moves, and denials of public hearings to advance numbers amongst each of Idaho’s 35 legislative Foundation to introduce HB 99 to bring common these bills forward despite overwhelming public districts. For example – District 14 has the sense reform to Idaho’s antiquated mandatory opposition from across the state. Be sure to stay highest number of registered voters at roughly minimum laws related to drug trafficking. HB vigilant – as we approach a presidential election 38,000 people while District 27 has the lowest 99 would essentially end mandatory minimum in 2020 and reapportionment in 2021, we’re number at roughly 17,000 people. Despite ample sentences in Idaho, removing unchecked power sure that this isn’t the last time we’ll have to meetings with legislative leadership, committee from the prosecutor’s hands and restoring members and hours spent in public hearings with defend our constitutional right to the ballot overwhelming opposition to the bill, SB 1159 initiative process. CRIMINAL JUSTICE CONTINUED

Pre-Trial Risk is designed, built and used. While the bill Assessment Algorithmic Tools was amended between the House and Senate Pre-trial reform is slowly making its way into Judiciary and Rules Committees, we were Idaho, and this year we helped oversee the able to provide language suggestions to ensure successful passage of HB 118, sponsored by Rep. best practices were included in the final bill Greg Chaney (R – 10, Caldwell), that would language, resulting in a win for transparency in require significant transparency in the use of our criminal justice system. pre-trial risk assessment algorithmic tools. These tools have come under scrutiny across the country Marsy’s Law because when adopted by government agencies Despite a well-funded, highly organized, and without adequate transparency, accountability, heavily lobbied campaign, we were able to defeat and oversight, their use can threaten civil the proposal known as Marsy’s Law liberties and exacerbate existing issues within for the third year in a row. SJR 102, sponsored by Sen. Todd Lakey (R – 12, Nampa) attempts to amend Idaho’s constitution to expand the rights of crime victims. However, these expanded rights are intended to come into direct conflict with the state and federal constitutional rights afforded to criminal defendants who are innocent until proven guilty – like the right to due process, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to be informed of and question the evidence against him or her. Even more, SJR 102 failed to include any recommendations from a 2015 Boise State HOUSING 150 community University study pertaining to crime victims members who that encouraged the legislature to allocate state showed up in funding for victim service programs and to create As expected, we saw the return of an expedited eviction bill, opposition to the an ombudsman position to ensure their current HB 138 sponsored by Rep. Caroline Troy (R – 5, Genesee), expedited eviction constitutional rights are met. This year, SJR at the request of the Idaho Apartment Association bill hearing government agencies such as racial bias, 102 began its path in the Senate State Affairs (IAA). During the interim months before the start of the inefficiencies, and opacity regarding decision- committee where it was moved forward to the legislative session, the ACLU and its housing partners making. Commonly, pre-trial risk tools are used Senate floor for a vote, yet it ultimately died due met with representatives from the IAA to attempt to to determine what risk an individual charged to a bipartisan vote in opposition. With all of the address due process concerns from the 2018 version of the with a crime poses from a failure to appear resources continuing to back the Marsy’s Law bill. Unfortunately, no such compromise was able to be struck, and so we entered the 2019 session standpoint, as well as their risk to commit a new campaign here in Idaho, we fully expect to work fully prepared to stop this likely unconstitutional bill. Ultimately, HB 138 attempted to expedite all crime prior to trial. These tools are then used to again in 2020 to stop this concerning legislation eviction proceedings in Idaho, regardless of the underlying reason for said eviction. This would have determine the level of pre-trial supervision, if any, and preserve our due process rights. resulted in eviction hearings being scheduled for court within 12 days, leaving tenants scrambling that individual should be subject to prior to their to identify legal counsel, collecting evidence, contacting witnesses and adequately preparing their trial, such as their ability to be released on their defense within such a short timeframe. And given the current state of Idaho’s lack of affordable own recognizance, to post bond, or to be subject housing, this legislation could have resulted in mass evictions leading to greater increases in the years the ACLU of Idaho to pre-trial detention in jail. HB 118 instead 3 state’s homeless population. After a long and contentious hearing in the House Judiciary, Rules and adopts sideboards that would require the data has defeated the well-funded Administration Committee, HB 138 ultimately died on the House floor by a 34-36 vote, ensuring used to build the tool be open to public inspection, California campaign known that due process in eviction proceedings will remain intact. Unfortunately, we do expect the IAA to auditing and testing, as well as prevents the tool’s as “Marsy’s Law” bring their unconstitutional bill back next year, where we will work to defend our housing victory creator from asserting trade secret protections once again. to ensure further transparency in how said tool FIRST AMENDMENT The 2019 legislative session saw the the responsibility of protecting the privacy introduction and movement of several rights of their donors. If SB 1114 were to pass, bills related to free speech, but none were it would have required non-profit entities to more concerning than SB 1114 regarding rethink their priorities – do they carry out WOMEN’S number of suspected 32 electioneering communication. This bill, the mission of their organization and engage abortion “complications” medical sponsored by Sen. (R – in policy work or do they remain silent on HEALTHCARE practitioners are required to 11, Huston) and Rep. (R – 27, issues of interest to protect who financially report to the state under the Burley) was the byproduct of an interim supports their organization? Ultimately SB revised Abortion Complications working committee regarding campaign 1114 was held in the Senate State Affairs Abortion Complications and finance reform and the legislature’s intent Committee, and the second iteration of Opt-In Sex Education Reporting Act Another legislative session means another to bring further transparency to elections. the bill, SB 1183, was also not given a public opportunity for the Idaho Legislature to further While we share the legislature’s interest in hearing, effectively killing the issue for the restrict women’s access to constitutionally practitioners to report “complications” of medical transparency, SB 1114 would have significantly year. We remain committed to working with protected reproductive healthcare. And the conditions that have no scientific or medical impacted the free speech rights of Idahoans lawmakers to identify a balanced solution to legislature got started early with the introduction link to abortion, like breast cancer, or medically and Idaho non-profit organizations and ensure that transparency and free speech in and passage of HB 64, the Abortion Complications broad terms like heavy bleeding and fever. jeopardized the privacy rights of Idahoans elections can both remain protected in future Reporting Act sponsored by Rep. Greg Chaney Unfortunately, HB 64 passed along party line who choose to contribute financial support to electioneering communications legislation. (R – 10, Caldwell). HB 64, a follow up to votes and was signed into law by Governor Little. non-profits of their choice. The requirements last year’s bill (HB 638), requires medical outlined under SB 1114 would have required practitioners to report to the Department of This session also saw attempts to drastically any entity making a reference to a candidate By the Numbers Health and Welfare regarding any suspected change the way sex education classes are offered or issue on the ballot to file an electioneering complications a woman is experiencing that they in Idaho’s public schools. HB 120, sponsored by communication report if the expense to • 95 days in the 2019 legislative session believe is connected to a previous abortion. At Rep. (R – 33, Idaho Falls), would make said reference cost the entity $1,000 to the end of the 2018 legislative session, HB 638 have required that all sex education classes produce. If that $1,000 threshold were met, • 105 legislators in both the House and Senate then the entity would be required by law to was challenged in federal court by the ACLU were provided on an opt-in basis with parental • 2 ACLU lobbyists present in the Statehouse and partners at Planned Parenthood and the consent. This change in access, despite being disclose any donor in the past calendar year law firm of Ferguson Durham, LLC in the case deemed unnecessary by public school officials and who donated $250 or more within that time • 65 bills tracked frame. This proposal, while intending to shine Planned Parenthood v. Wasden. The lawsuit educators, would have placed significant barriers before students who may not otherwise have a light on “dark money” that may influence • 19 hearings where ACLU staff testified or contends that abortion complications reporting submitted written testimony requirements violate constitutional guarantees access to critically needed school curriculum that election outcomes, clearly disregards the of due process and equal protection by arbitrarily examines such subjects as human development, free speech rights of non-profit entities • 14 bills ACLU supported singling out one particular medical procedure and relationships, personal skills, sexual behavior whose mission requires them to engage in requiring invasive reporting that has nothing to and health, and society and culture. After strict policy discussions while also bearing • 23 bills ACLU opposed do with protecting patient health care. With the overwhelming testimony in opposition to the • 3 trainings held to encourage the public to introduction of HB 64, there was no attempt to bill during its hearing in the House Education engage in the legislative process address the clear misinformation provided in the Committee, the bill was thankfully stopped in the initial legislation, such as requiring hospitals, Senate Education Committee where it was held, • 45 attendees at the first-ever ACLU Criminal medical facilities and independent medical meaning it was effectively killed for the session. Justice Lobby Day ACLU OF IDAHO 2019 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD WHY THE SCORECARD IS CREATED We created our legislative scorecard to let you know where your legislators stand on a number of civil liberties issues. We encourage you to use this scorecard to give your state Representative and Senator feedback on their votes during the 2019 Legislative Session. Direct communication with your elected officials is a valuable way to encourage them to stand up for freedom and protect our 14 years spent waiting for the constitutional rights. legislature to amend the Idaho Human Rights Act and adopt HOW THE SCORECARD IS CREATED civil rights protections for We make sure that all legislators know our position LGBTQ Idahoans prior to voting on important civil liberties issues LGBTQ RIGHTS by distributing a floor statement explaining our Fourteen years have come and gone and Idaho Idahoans. Despite the lack of legislative position. We then select a range of key civil has still refused to amend the Human Rights movement on the issue, the Add the Words liberties issues to include in our scorecard. This Act to prohibit discrimination based on gender coalition was very active this session, kicking off identity and sexual orientation in employment, our efforts with a well-attended lobby training, year, many bills that originated in the House and housing and public accommodations. The session numerous statehouse demonstrations, and an voted off the House floor were ultimately held in started off with high hopes that a Senate bill end-of-session press conference highlighting the may be introduced and given a hearing this numerous religious freedoms already enshrined Senate committees, effectively killing the bill, thus year, thanks to the convening of a bipartisan in federal and state law to further demonstrate resulting in us scoring the House on more bills than working group led by Sen. (R – 34, to the legislature and to the public that religion the Senate. Rexburg). However, hopes were soon dashed cannot be used as a shield for inaction on upon realizing that the working group could not enhancing our state civil rights law. As we do agree on a “compromise” solution primarily due every year, we’ll continue to work throughout the to differences regarding expanding religious interim with our legislative allies and community exemptions at the expense of enacting true partners to work towards legislative progress non-discrimination protections for all LGBTQ during the 2020 session. 2018 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD ACLU OF IDAHO

Reproductive Healthcare HB 64 Abortion Complications Due Process HB 138 Expedited Evictions 1 Reporting Act LOSS 5 Sponsor: Rep. Caroline Troy (R – 5, Genesee) WIN Sponsor: Rep. Greg Chaney (R – 10, Caldwell) KEY POINTS: KEY POINTS: ACLU opposed • Requires that all evictions in Idaho proceed along an expedited ACLU opposed • Requires medical practitioners to document suspected patient Passed House timeframe, regardless of the reason for said eviction – meaning notice Passed House complications they believe are connected to a previous abortion & Senate to vacate would be served within three days and a court hearing Judiciary, Rules scheduled within twelve days • Mandates that the list of reported complications be compiled into an Signed by & Administration annual report provided to the legislature each year Governor Little • Severely restricts access to due process. The shortened timeframe Committee for an expedited hearing means Idaho renters would have very Died on House Floor • Includes suspected complications that have no link to abortion, little time to secure legal counsel, collect evidence and prepare their like breast cancer, or are medically broad terms like heavy defense before going to court. bleeding and fever • Prevents landlords from resolving repair demands unless tenants are in 100% compliance with all terms of their lease, jeopardizing public health and safety in shared housing spaces

Criminal Justice HB 99 Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Reform LOSS 2 ACLU supported Sponsors: Reps. Bryan Zollinger (R – 33, Idaho Falls) and Ilana Rubel (D – 18, Boise) Free speech HB 194 Public Library Wi-Fi Filtering LOSS KEY POINTS: Passed House Sponsor: Rep. (R – 24, Twin Falls) • Strikes mandatory minimum sentences imposed for drug trafficking Died in Senate 6 KEY POINTS: ACLU opposed related offenses Judiciary & Rules • Mandates that all public libraries require filtering of adult content on Passed House • Restores judicial discretion in sentencing, allowing judges to Committee private, personal devices such as cell phones, laptops, and tablets & Senate determine an appropriate sentence based on the facts of the crime • Blocking content, particularly if it is occurring in a viewpoint based Signed by way, could restrict access to important ideas and concepts that should Governor Little be available to all who use publicly accessible wireless internet or publicly accessible computers with internet access Criminal Justice HB 118 Pretrial Risk Assessment Algorithms • Allows for internet filtering to be turned off upon request, which Sponsor: Rep. Greg Chaney (R – 10, Caldwell) 3 WIN effectively creates a government list of those who want to view adult KEY POINTS: ACLU supported speech online - both invading the privacy of a law-abiding citizen who • Requires that data used in the creation of a pretrial risk assessment requests deactivation and chilling others from seeking it algorithm be publicly available for inspection and review Passed House • Prevents algorithm creators from asserting “trade secrets” as a & Senate means to prevent disclosure of data used in the creation of a pretrial Signed by risk assessment algorithm Governor Little Voting Rights HB 296 Ballot Initiative Trailer Bill • Restores transparency in decision making regarding the use of Sponsor: Rep. Sage Dixon (R - 1, Ponderay) WIN 7 • Trailer bill to SB 1159 (meaning HB 296 only exists if SB 1159 pretrial risk assessment tools, which can be integral in preventing ACLU opposed racial bias and further systemic inefficiencies moves through the legislative process and becomes law) deemed as a “compromise” bill despite being designed behind closed doors and Passed House without stakeholder input & Senate • Changed the ballot initiative requirements in SB 1159 from requiring Vetoed by Reproductive Healthcare HB 120 Opt-in Sex Education signatures in 32 out of 35 legislative districts to two-thirds of all Governor Little Sponsor: Rep. Barbara Ehardt (R – 33, Idaho Falls) WIN legislative districts, as well as changing the signature gathering 4 timeframe from six to nine months KEY POINTS: ACLU opposed • Requires all Idaho students to opt-in to sex education classes offered in public schools Passed House • Places unnecessary barriers before students who may have no other Died Senate opportunity to access comprehensive sex education curriculum Education ENSURING THE beyond what’s offered in the public school setting Committee • Prevents access to critically needed education that is key to reducing unwanted teenage pregnancy and the transmission of sexually- CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS related illnesses OF ALL IDAHOANS. 2018 LEGISLATIVE SCORECARD

1 3 6 7 10 11 ACLU % Voting Rights HB 303 Changes to Ballot Initiative 2019 SENATE Requirements, Part Two WIN 8 Sponsor: Rep. Sage Dixon (R - 1, Ponderay) LEGISLATIVE R 33 ACLU opposed KEY POINTS: R A 0 • Follow up bill to the veto of SB 1159/HB 296 Passed House SCORECARD R Steven “Steve” Bair 17 • Requires that ballot initiative campaigns be limited to a single Died Senate State subject, that they create a fiscal note for implementation of their Affairs Committee R 50 proposed policy change in partnership with the Division of Financial Fields with Liberty R 83 Management and that the campaign propose a funding source Torch voted with the ACLU D Cherie Buckner-Webb 67

Religious Discrimination H.R. 6 Christian Persecution Fields left blank D 67 Sponsor: Rep. (R – 7, White Bird) opposed the ACLU 9 WIN R Van T. Burtenshaw A 20 KEY POINTS: • House resolution that specifically referenced the persecution of ACLU opposed Fields with the letter R Don Cheatham 33 Christians over those in other minority and non-dominant faith Passed House A “A” indicate absent groups, in violation of the First Amendment’s protection of religious for vote, does not R 83 neutrality State Affairs impact score R 50 • Failed to recognize the discrimination that Jews and Muslims Died House Floor have recently faced in Idaho at the hands of state agencies and the Reproductive R C. Scott Grow 17 legislature, further demonstrating the resolution’s inherent preference 1 Healthcare R 50 for Christians over those of other faiths R Mark Harris 50 2 Criminal Justice Voting Rights SB 1159 Changes to Ballot Initiative R 17 Requirements WIN R Brent Hill 17 10 Sponsor: Sen. C. Scott Grow (R – 14, Eagle) 3 Criminal Justice KEY POINTS: ACLU opposed R Dan Johnson A 80 • Requires that ballot initiative campaigns be limited to a single Passed Senate D Maryanne Jordan 83 subject, that they create a fiscal note for implementation of their Reproductive & House proposed policy change in partnership with the Division of Financial 4 Healthcare R Todd Lakey 17 Management and that the campaign propose a funding source Vetoed by R 50 • Changes the signature collection threshold from 6% of registered Governor Little Due Process voters to 10% of registered voters 5 R 33 • Shortens the signature gathering timeframe from 18 months to six R Patti Anne Lodge 50 months Free Speech R Fred Martin 50 • Requires that petition gatherers collect signatures from 32 out of 35 6 legislative districts, increased from the current 18 legislative district R 17 requirement in Idaho Code 7 Voting Rights D David Nelson 83 D Mark Nye 67 Criminal Justice S.J.R. 102 Marsy’s Law Victims Right Constitutional Amendment WIN 8 Voting Rights R 33 11 Sponsor: Sen. Todd Lakey (R – 12, Nampa) R Jim Rice 50 KEY POINTS: ACLU opposed • California campaign aimed at expanding crime victim rights at the Religious R 33 Passed Senate State expense of creating chaos in our broader criminal justice system 9 Discrimination Affairs Committee D 83 • Creates unintended consequences such as violating criminal defendants’ right to due process and right to a speedy trial Died Senate floor R 33 10 Voting Rights • Establishes new state responsibility to provide victims legal R 33 representatives all while providing no funding to improve current victim rights programs D Janie Ward-Engelking 67 Criminal Justice • Ignores recommendations of Boise State University study of victim 11 R 17 experiences accessing Idaho specific victim programs R Jim Woodward 83 2018 LEGISLATIVE REPORT ACLU OF IDAHO

2019 HOUSE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ACLU % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ACLU % LEGISLATIVE D Chris Abernathy 90 R James Hotlzcalw 20 SCORECARD R James Addis A 33 R 40 R 40 R 30 R Neil A. Anderson 40 R 30 Fields with Liberty R A 33 R 20 Torch voted with the ACLU R 20 R 50

Fields left blank R Randy Armstrong 20 R 50 opposed the ACLU R A 33 D Rob Mason 90 Fields with the letter R 20 D John McCrostie 90 A “A” indicate absent for vote, does not D 90 R 30 impact score R 30 R 30 Reproductive R 20 R 30 1 Healthcare R Greg Chaney 20 R 30 D 90 R 20 2 Criminal Justice R Chad Christensen A 22 R 10 R Lance Clow 60 R 30 Criminal Justice 3 R Gary E. Collins 40 R 20 R 22 R 20 Reproductive A 4 Healthcare D Muffy Davis 90 D Illana Rubel 90 R 30 R 50 Due Process 5 R Gayann DeMordaunt A 22 R Paul Shepherd 20 R Sage Dixon 20 D Elaine Smith 90 6 Free Speech R Barbara Edhart 20 R Thyra Stevenson 30 CIVIL LIBERTIES D 100 R A 22 7 Voting Rights D Matthew “Mat” Erpelding A 89 D 90 R Rodney Furniss 20 R Caroline Troy A 44 8 Voting Rights D John Gannon 90 R 10 PROTECTING R Terry Gestrin 30 R Jarom Wagoner A A A 14 Religious R A 22 D 90 9 Discrimination R Pricilla Giddings 60 R 30

R 60 R Fred Wood A 67 10 Voting Rights D A 89 R A 11 R John Green 30 R 10 11 Criminal Justice R Steven Harris 20 R A 33 R Linda Hartgen A 56 R Bryan Zollinger 30 ©KathrynGamble

P.O. BOX 1897, BOISE, ID 83701 | 208-344-9750 | ACLUIDAHO.ORG