DOCSLIB.ORG

Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity Study (May 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RUTLAND COUNTY COUNCIL LANDSCAPE SENSITIVITY AND CAPACITY STUDY F I N A L R E P O R T By DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES Sherwood House 144 Annesley Road Hucknall Nottingham NG15 7DD Tel 0115 968 0092 E mail: [email protected] Website: www.dt-a.co.uk Doc. Ref: 1750 Final Rpt. Issue: 2 Date: May 2010 DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES PLANNING, LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS Rutland County Council Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity Study This page intentionally blank Final Report Issue 2 May 2010 Rutland County Council Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity Study Contents Page 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 1 2. Background, Outline of the Brief and Format of the Report .......................................... 5 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................... 9 4. Site Assessment & Analysis – Oakham ......................................................................... 19 4.1 Local Landscape Character Context ....................................................................... 19 4.2 Site Assessment & Analysis of Specified Sites in Oakham ..................................... 24 Sites 2A, 2B, 2C & 2D .............................................................................................. 25 Sites 3A & 3B .......................................................................................................... 41 Sites 4A & 4B .......................................................................................................... 49 Sites 5A & 5B .......................................................................................................... 57 Site 6 ....................................................................................................................... 65 Site 7 ....................................................................................................................... 71 Site 8 ....................................................................................................................... 75 Sites 9A & 9B .......................................................................................................... 79 5. Site Assessment & Analysis – Uppingham .................................................................... 87 5.1 Local Landscape Character Context ....................................................................... 87 5.2 Site Assessment & Analysis of Specified Sites in Uppingham ................................ 90 Site 2 ....................................................................................................................... 91 Site 3 ....................................................................................................................... 97 Site 4 ..................................................................................................................... 101 Site 5A .................................................................................................................. 105 Site 5B .................................................................................................................. 109 Site 6 ..................................................................................................................... 113 Site 7 ..................................................................................................................... 119 6. Site Assessment & Analysis – Stamford ..................................................................... 125 6.1 Local Landscape Character Context ..................................................................... 125 6.2 Site Assessment & Analysis of Specified Site in Stamford ................................... 128 Site(s) A & B .......................................................................................................... 129 7. Recommendations for Priority Sites ........................................................................... 137 Tables Table 1: Summary of Specified Sites in Oakham............................................................... 2 Table 2: Summary of Specified Sites in Uppingham ......................................................... 3 Table 3: Summary of Specified Site in Stamford .................................................................... 3 Table 4: Landscape and Settlement Character Sensitivity .............................................. 14 Table 5: Visual Sensitivity ................................................................................................ 15 Table 6: Overall Landscape Sensitivity Categories .......................................................... 16 Table 7: Landscape Value ................................................................................................ 16 Table 8: Overall Landscape Capacity Categories ............................................................ 17 Table 9: Priority of Specified Sites in Oakham .............................................................. 137 Table 10: Priority of Specified Sites in Uppingham ......................................................... 140 Final Report Issue 2 May 2010 Rutland County Council Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity Study Figures Figure 1: County-wide Landscape Character Areas ..................................................... 145 Figure 2: Local Landscape Character Setting - Oakham............................................... 147 Figure 3A: Landscape & Visual Context – Oakham (south) ............................................ 149 Figure 3B: Landscape & Visual Context – Oakham (north) ............................................ 151 Figure 4: Landscape Sensitivity – Oakham ................................................................... 153 Figure 5: Landscape Capacity – Oakham ..................................................................... 155 Figure 6: Local Landscape Character Setting - Uppingham ......................................... 157 Figure 7: Landscape & Visual Context – Uppingham ................................................... 159 Figure 8: Landscape Sensitivity – Uppingham ............................................................. 161 Figure 9: Landscape Capacity – Uppingham ................................................................ 163 Figure 10: Local Landscape Character Setting - Stamford ............................................. 165 Figure 11: Landscape & Visual Context – Stamford ....................................................... 167 Figure 12: Landscape Sensitivity – Stamford ................................................................. 169 Figure 13: Landscape Capacity – Stamford .................................................................... 171 Final Report Issue 2 May 2010 Rutland County Council Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity Study 1. Executive Summary 1.1 This study relates to specified areas of land in Rutland around Oakham and Uppingham and on the edge of Stamford which are being evaluated by Rutland County Council (RCC) as part of its Local Development Framework (LDF) Core Strategy. The Council has commissioned the study in order to help determine the most appropriate directions for future development in Rutland. 1.2 The study follows best practice methodology for judging landscape sensitivity and capacity in accordance with the techniques and criteria described in The Countryside Agency’s and Scottish Natural Heritage’s joint Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland, 2002, Topic Paper 6. 1.3 Detailed fieldwork on the edges of Oakham, Uppingham and Stamford has been undertaken in order to provide a finer grain of assessment than the county wide landscape character assessment undertaken by David Tyldesley & Associates in 2003. This was required in order to provide a greater level of understanding of the landscape and settlement character sensitivity of each of the specified sites. 1.4 Land on the edge of Oakham has been sub-divided into four landscape character types, referred to in this report as ‘North West Oakham Vale’, ‘North East Oakham Vale’, ‘Egleton Plain’ and ‘High Rutland Fringe’. 1.5 Land on the edge of Uppingham has been sub-divided into two landscape character types, referred to in this report as ‘Uppingham Ridges and Valleys’ and ‘Uppingham Plateau’. 1.6 Land within Rutland on the edge of Stamford has not been further sub-divided into smaller landscape character types. The eastern half of the site, referred to as Site B, lies within the ‘Clay Woodlands’ landscape character area as defined in the 2003 county wide landscape character assessment. The western half of the site, referred to as Site A, has an indistinctive urban edge character. 1.7 Consultation was undertaken on a draft report (Issue 1, 21 April 2010) in April 2010. Consultees asked to comment were: CPRE, Rutland Branch English Heritage (EH) Leicestershire County Council, Historic & Natural Environment (LCC) Leicestershire & Rutland Wildlife Trust (L&RWT) Natural England (NE) South Kesteven District Council (SKDC) Few comments were received, which were generally minor in nature. In EHs opinion the study provides a useful evidence base for the LDF but will need supporting by additional assessments on historic landscape character (LCC suggested that this could be a separate research project) and biodiversity. EH also commented that RCC will need to understand impacts on heritage assets and other potential impacts of growth due to road
Recommended publications
  • 1328/17 Dear Sir/Madam Your Request for Information Has Now Been Considered

    1328/17 Dear Sir/Madam Your Request for Information Has Now Been Considered

    Rutland County Council telephone: 01572 722 577 Catmose fax: 01572 758 307 Oakham email: [email protected] Rutland web: www.rutland.gov.uk LE15 6HP DX: 28340 Oakham 16 November 2017 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST – 1328/17 Dear Sir/Madam Your request for information has now been considered and the information requested is provided below. Request: I would like to clarify that I am interested in the Parliamentary electorate and not the Local government electorate. I am writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. In order to assist you with this request, I am outlining my query as specifically as possible. I understand your local authority hold the figures of the number of people on the electoral register for each ward in your area. I would like to know the following. For each ward in your local authority: the total number of people on the electoral register broken down by individual ward for the following time points: a. At the time of the European referendum (23/06/2016) b. At the end of 2016 (01/12/2016) c. At the time of the 2017 general election (08/06/2017) d. At the time of most recent records you hold Response: Please see attached spreadsheet which contains the figures requested. Please note that the difference in format of the first sheet is due to a change in our software provider. You are free to use any documents supplied for your own use, including for non- commercial research purposes. The documents may also be used for news reporting.
  • Team Vicar – House for Duty Braunston, Brooke, Hambleton & Egleton

    Team Vicar – House for Duty Braunston, Brooke, Hambleton & Egleton

    Team Vicar – House for Duty Braunston, Brooke, Hambleton & Egleton St Andrew Hambleton St Peter Brooke St Edmund Egleton All Saints Braunston Oakham Team Ministry – Team Vicar – Braunston, Brooke, Hambleton & Egleton A welcome from the Team Rector Revd Stephen Griffiths I hope you enjoy reading this profile for a House for Duty Team Vicar in the Oakham Team Ministry. We are prayerfully looking for someone to join our ministry team as we serve our group of ten parishes in this lovely part of rural England. The four parishes that make up this House for Duty post are comfortable in their central to low tradition and want their worship to be accessible to the whole community. One of the attractions of this post is the opportunity to serve alongside a ministries that you would like to participate in and explore beyond your supportive and cooperative team of clergy and lay people. The phrase we primary area of responsibility. There is scope to craft a working agreement often use to describe our benefice is ‘ten churches, one family’. There is a around your gifts and interests. growing sense of inter-dependence amongst the parishes. This is In this benefice we hold together and value a wide variety of ministries, demonstrated in our team-wide shared worship, our central administration ranging from the more traditional patterns of worship to innovative office, and finances. We deploy a team of organists and have a united ecumenical services; from civic and military services to ministry to care benefice choir, Laudamus, led by our Director of Music. We have a team of homes; from bereavement support to a youth work apprenticeship scheme.
  • 08 August 2017 FREEDOM of INFORMATION REQUEST – 921/17

    08 August 2017 FREEDOM of INFORMATION REQUEST – 921/17

    Rutland County Council telephone: 01572 722 577 Catmose fax: 01572 758 307 Oakham email: [email protected] Rutland web: www.rutland.gov.uk LE15 6HP DX: 28340 Oakham 08 August 2017 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST – 921/17 Dear Sir/Madam Your request for information has now been considered and the information requested is provided below. Request: 1. Please provide your authority’s air quality data for 2014/2015/2016 as supplied by the laboratory that analysed the figures. Answer: Please find attached three pdf documents containing our nitrogen dioxide ambient air quality monitoring results as provided by the laboratory for 2014, 2015 and 2016. 2. Please provide the air quality data that your authority supplied to DEFRA in 2014/2015/2016. Answer: Please find attached ‘reports’ containing air quality data supplied to Defra in 2014/2015/2016. 3. Please provide the number of air collection tubes that were declared void – and the reasons for that – in 2014/2015/2016. Answer: We monitor for nitrogen dioxide using diffusion tubes. The numbers of tubes that are declared void and reasons are as follows: 2014 2, 1 tube was taken without consent, one tube was not exposed 2015 2, both tubes were taken without consent 2016 Nil You are free to use any documents supplied for your own use, including for non- commercial research purposes. The documents may also be used for news reporting. However, any other type of re-use, for example by publishing the documents or issuing copies to the public will require the permission of the copyright owner, where copyright exists.
  • Plot Next to Barnetts Farm, 7 Church Road, Egleton, Rutland, LE15 8AD

    Plot Next to Barnetts Farm, 7 Church Road, Egleton, Rutland, LE15 8AD

    Plot Next To Barnetts Farm, 7 Church Road, Egleton, Rutland, LE15 8AD Attractively set back from the main street in this picturesque Rutland Water conservation village and accessed via a private driveway. The village itself is situated in an enviable location adjacent to Rutland Water Nature Reserve and providing easy access to the market towns of Oakham, Uppingham and Stamford and the excellent amenities and schooling they have to offer including their well known public schools. Oundle and Peterborough schools are also accessible from this location. Whilst the property is located in a quiet countryside setting there are main roads and fast London rail links close by. The ground works and foundations have already been completed on this detached new build 3 bedroomed property with double garage, designed very much to look like a character cottage in keeping with its surroundings. Currently having planning permission for a thatched roof, the planners have said they would consider slate if the purchaser preferred, subject to planning. With work having already commenced, saving on the overall build time and cost, there is no CIL charge to pay to the local authority. Guide Price £375,000 36 High Street 18 Nottingham Street 1 Sheep Market 2 Orange Street Grantham Station Peterborough Station Oakham Melton Mowbray Stamford Uppingham Grantham Peterborough Rutland LE15 6AL Leic. LE13 1NW Lincs. PE9 2RB Rutland LE15 9SQ Lincs. NG31 6BT Cambs. PE1 1QL T: 01572 757979 T: 01664 491610 T: 01780 484555 T: 01572 821935 T: 01476 855618 T: 01733 788888 Church Road, Egleton (Continued) Please note the following: • Water, sewage and electricity are all installed adjacent to the plot in the main driveway and available for connection thus saving a great deal of money installing these and in paying for road closures.
  • Leicestershire

    Leicestershire

    484 FAR LEICESTERSHIRE FARMERS continued. Perry J. Packi11gton, Ashby-de-la-Zch 1 Ravell Wm. N ormanton, Nottingham Orson F. Harby, Melton Mowbray Petrie F. G. Scalford, Melton MwbryiReast John, Thornton, Leicester Orson John, Sy.sonby,Melton Mowbry PhiEips Franci·s, Kno·ssington,Oakham Reco:rd Thomas, The Lodge, Fowles­ Orson William, Dalby-on-the-Wolds, Phipps George S. Stapleton, Hinck1ey 1 worth, Lutte.rworth Melton Mowbray Pickard James M. Sibson, Atherstone Reddington J. Littlethorpe ldg. Lcstr Orton MI'Is. Elizabeth & Son, Wood- Pickering C. Shortcliffe, Shepshed, Redfearn Henry, Shoby house, Shoby, house, Loughborough Loughborough Melton Mowbray Orton Joseph & Nathaniel, Higham- Pickering James, Stoke fields, Stoke Red:fern Wm. Moira rd. Ashby-de-la-Z on-the-Hill, Nuneaton Golding, Nuneaton Redmile Benj. & Wm. Ketton, Stmfrd Orton John, Newbold-de-Verdun,Lcstr Pickerirug Thomas, Ashby-de-la-Zouch Reeve Wm. Sherard, Wing, Oakham Orton John T. D. Ba.rkby, Leicester Pickering William, Old: hall, Bardon ReeiVes Ja.me~ B. Thornton, Leicester Orton Rd. B. Bottesford, Nottingham park, Markfie'ld, Leicester Reeves Wm. Cold Overt on, Oakham Osborn J. Newbo:ld-de-Verdun, Lcstr Pilgrim Samuel Craven, Outwoods, Reid Arthur, Holwell, Ab-Kettleby, Os win J ames, Manor house, BuTton Burbage, Hinckley lMelton Mowb.ray Overy, Leicester Pinder Robert, Whitwell, Oakham Reid John, C~stle Donington, Derby Owen J. Ratcliffe Caley, Atherstone Pinder Mrs. T.Lit.Casterton,Stamford Renals E. Woodthorpe, Loughborough Oxby Mrs. E. Long- Whatton,Lghboro' Pinder William, The Walk, Great Cas- Renals J. Knight Thorpe, Loughboro' Pacey Thomas, Bescaby & Burton te.rton, Stamford Rennocks Geo. Whitwick, Leicester Laza11s, Melton Mowbray Pitcher Reuben, North Kilworth,Rgby Renshaw Oliver, Sapcote, Hinckley Pacey Walker, Saxby, Melton Mowbry Plowright George, Hallaton,Uppinghm Reynolds Elias & William, College ldg.
  • British Family Names

    British Family Names

    cs 25o/ £22, Cornrll IBniwwitg |fta*g BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME FROM THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND THE GIFT OF Hcnrti W~ Sage 1891 A.+.xas.Q7- B^llll^_ DATE DUE ,•-? AUG 1 5 1944 !Hak 1 3 1^46 Dec? '47T Jan 5' 48 ft e Univeral, CS2501 .B23 " v Llb«"y Brit mii!Sm?nS,£& ori8'" and m 3 1924 olin 029 805 771 The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924029805771 BRITISH FAMILY NAMES. : BRITISH FAMILY NAMES ftbetr ©riain ano fIDeaning, Lists of Scandinavian, Frisian, Anglo-Saxon, and Norman Names. HENRY BARBER, M.D. (Clerk), "*• AUTHOR OF : ' FURNESS AND CARTMEL NOTES,' THE CISTERCIAN ABBEY OF MAULBRONN,' ( SOME QUEER NAMES,' ' THE SHRINE OF ST. BONIFACE AT FULDA,' 'POPULAR AMUSEMENTS IN GERMANY,' ETC. ' "What's in a name ? —Romeo and yuliet. ' I believe now, there is some secret power and virtue in a name.' Burton's Anatomy ofMelancholy. LONDON ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW, E.C. 1894. 4136 CONTENTS. Preface - vii Books Consulted - ix Introduction i British Surnames - 3 nicknames 7 clan or tribal names 8 place-names - ii official names 12 trade names 12 christian names 1 foreign names 1 foundling names 1 Lists of Ancient Patronymics : old norse personal names 1 frisian personal and family names 3 names of persons entered in domesday book as HOLDING LANDS temp. KING ED. CONFR. 37 names of tenants in chief in domesday book 5 names of under-tenants of lands at the time of the domesday survey 56 Norman Names 66 Alphabetical List of British Surnames 78 Appendix 233 PREFACE.
  • Blue Ball Cycle Ride #2

    Blue Ball Cycle Ride #2

    Blue Ball Cycle Ride #2 Mountain bike (or walking) route from the Blue Ball around Leighfield and back. This peaceful route takes you up and down a set of hills and valleys to the south of Braunston. The first couple of miles are on-road, the rest is predominantly on well-surfaced tracks but also on wide, grassed ways. There are gates, but no stiles to cross. The Route: Ride Time 1 hour, Elevation Gain: 705 ft., Distance 7 miles Park near the Blue Ball (1) then, if you're standing at the pub looking towards the churchyard, head off left and then immediately downhill to the right, following the signpost to ‘Leighfield and Ridlington’. Passing the stream to your left, keep on the road and head up the hill. You are now on Wood Lane which you will need to follow for about another mile. At the top of the hill (2), follow the road left and then go down the next hill. As you cycle up the following hill, you will see road sign near the crest. At the sign, you will see that the right-hand turn is signposted ‘Leighfield Lodge, No Through Road’ (3), take this turning and carry on. When you come across a gate in the road (4), go through the gap just to the right and continue heading straight down the tree-lined avenue that is Leighfield Way. At the bottom, you will find yourself at Leigh Lodge (5). Here you must follow the zig-zag in the road, left and then right.
  • Royal Forest Trail

    Royal Forest Trail

    Once there was a large forest on the borders of Rutland called the Royal Forest of Leighfield. Now only traces remain, like Prior’s Coppice, near Leighfield Lodge. The plentiful hedgerows and small fields in the area also give hints about the past vegetation cover. Villages, like Belton and Braunston, once deeply situated in the forest, are square shaped. This is considered to be due to their origin as enclosures within the forest where the first houses surrounded an open space into which animals could be driven for their protection and greater security - rather like the covered wagon circle in the American West. This eventually produced a ‘hollow-centred’ village later filled in by buildings. In Braunston the process of filling in the centre had been going on for many centuries. Ridlington betrays its forest proximity by its ‘dead-end’ road, continued only by farm tracks today. The forest blocked entry in this direction. Indeed, if you look at the 2 ½ inch O.S map you will notice that there are no through roads between Belton and Braunston due to the forest acting as a physical administrative barrier. To find out more about this area, follow this trail… You can start in Oakham, going west out of town on the Cold Overton Road, then 2nd left onto West Road towards Braunston. Going up the hill to Braunston. In Braunston, walk around to see the old buildings such as Cheseldyn Farm and Quaintree Hall; go down to the charming little bridge over the River Gwash (the stream flowing into Rutland Water).
  • Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Revocation of the East

    Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Revocation of the East

    Appendix A – SEA of the Revocation of the East Midlands Regional Strategy Appendix A Policies in the East Midlands Regional Strategy This Appendix sets out the text of the policies that make up the Regional Strategy for the East Midlands. It comprises policies contained in The East Midlands Regional Plan published in March 2009. The East Midlands Regional Plan POLICY 1: Regional Core Objectives To secure the delivery of sustainable development within the East Midlands, all strategies, plans and programmes having a spatial impact should meet the following core objectives: a) To ensure that the existing housing stock and new affordable and market housing address need and extend choice in all communities in the region. b) To reduce social exclusion through: • the regeneration of disadvantaged areas, • the reduction of inequalities in the location and distribution of employment, housing, health and other community facilities and services, and by; • responding positively to the diverse needs of different communities. c) To protect and enhance the environmental quality of urban and rural settlements to make them safe, attractive, clean and crime free places to live, work and invest in, through promoting: • ‘green infrastructure’; • enhancement of the ‘urban fringe’; • involvement of Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships; and • high quality design which reflects local distinctiveness. d) To improve the health and mental, physical and spiritual well being of the Region's residents through improvements in: • air quality; • ‘affordable warmth’;
  • Landscape Character Assessment of Rutland (2003)

    Landscape Character Assessment of Rutland (2003)

    RUTLAND LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT BY DAVID TYLDESLEY AND ASSOCIATES Sherwood House 144 Annesley Road Hucknall Nottingham NG15 7DD Tel 0115 968 0092 Fax 0115 968 0344 Doc. Ref. 1452rpt Issue: 02 Date: 31st May 2003 Contents 1. Purpose of this Report 1 2. Introduction to Landscape Character Assessment 2 3. Landscape Character Types in Rutland 5 4. The Landscape of High Rutland 7 Leighfield Forest 8 Ridges and Valleys 9 Eyebrook Valley 10 Chater Valley 11 5. The Landscape of the Vale of Catmose 15 6. The Landscape of the Rutland Water Basin 18 7. The Landscape of the Rutland Plateau 20 Cottesmore Plateau 21 Clay Woodlands 23 Gwash Valley 24 Ketton Plateau 25 8. The Landscape of the Welland Valley 28 Middle Valley West 28 Middle Valley East 29 Figures and Maps Figure 1 Landscape Character Types and Sub-Areas Figure 2 Key to 1/25,000 Maps Maps 1 - 10 Detailed 1/25,000 maps showing boundaries of Landscape Character Types and Sub-Areas Photographs Sheet 1 High Rutland and Welland Valley Sheet 2 Vale of Catmose and Rutland Water Basin Sheet 3 Rutland Plateau References 1 Leicestershire County Council, 1976, County Landscape Appraisal 2 Leicestershire County Council, 1995 published 2001, Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Landscape and Woodland Strategy 3 Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage, 2002, Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland 4 Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment and the Landscape Institute, 2002, Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Spons 5 Countryside Agency and English Nature, 1997, The Character of England: Landscape Wildlife and Natural Features and Countryside Agency, 1999, Countryside Character Volume 4: East Midlands 6 Department of Environment, 1997 Planning Policy Guidance 7 The Countryside - Environmental Quality and Economic and Social Development RUTLAND LANDSCAPE CHARACTER ASSESSMENT DTA 2003 1.
  • Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes

    Areas Designated As 'Rural' for Right to Buy Purposes

    Areas designated as 'Rural' for right to buy purposes Region District Designated areas Date designated East Rutland the parishes of Ashwell, Ayston, Barleythorpe, Barrow, 17 March Midlands Barrowden, Beaumont Chase, Belton, Bisbrooke, Braunston, 2004 Brooke, Burley, Caldecott, Clipsham, Cottesmore, Edith SI 2004/418 Weston, Egleton, Empingham, Essendine, Exton, Glaston, Great Casterton, Greetham, Gunthorpe, Hambelton, Horn, Ketton, Langham, Leighfield, Little Casterton, Lyddington, Lyndon, Manton, Market Overton, Martinsthorpe, Morcott, Normanton, North Luffenham, Pickworth, Pilton, Preston, Ridlington, Ryhall, Seaton, South Luffenham, Stoke Dry, Stretton, Teigh, Thistleton, Thorpe by Water, Tickencote, Tinwell, Tixover, Wardley, Whissendine, Whitwell, Wing. East of North Norfolk the whole district, with the exception of the parishes of 15 February England Cromer, Fakenham, Holt, North Walsham and Sheringham 1982 SI 1982/21 East of Kings Lynn and the parishes of Anmer, Bagthorpe with Barmer, Barton 17 March England West Norfolk Bendish, Barwick, Bawsey, Bircham, Boughton, Brancaster, 2004 Burnham Market, Burnham Norton, Burnham Overy, SI 2004/418 Burnham Thorpe, Castle Acre, Castle Rising, Choseley, Clenchwarton, Congham, Crimplesham, Denver, Docking, Downham West, East Rudham, East Walton, East Winch, Emneth, Feltwell, Fincham, Flitcham cum Appleton, Fordham, Fring, Gayton, Great Massingham, Grimston, Harpley, Hilgay, Hillington, Hockwold-Cum-Wilton, Holme- Next-The-Sea, Houghton, Ingoldisthorpe, Leziate, Little Massingham, Marham, Marshland
  • Heritage Counts 2005 the Regional Context 2005 the State of the EAST MIDLANDS� in the East Midlands Historic Environment

    Heritage Counts 2005 the Regional Context 2005 the State of the EAST MIDLANDS in the East Midlands Historic Environment

    EAST MIDLANDS’ Heritage Counts 2005 is produced by English Heritage on behalf of the East Midlands Regional Heritage Forum • Association of Building Preservation Trusts • British Waterways • Council for British Archaeology • Country Land and Business Association • Defra RDS • East Midlands Amenity Societies Association • East Midlands Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers • East Midlands Development Agency • East Midlands Local Government Association • East Midlands Museums, Libraries and Archives Council • East Midlands Regional Assembly • East Midlands Tourism • Government Office East Midlands • Heritage Education Trust • Heritage Lottery Fund • Historic Houses Association • Institute of Historic Building Conservation • National Trust This report has been prepared by English Heritage with the support of Farrer & Co. and Cowley Manor. English Heritage Text.All text © English Heritage 2005. Published by English Heritage (produced by Creative Services Department, Swindon). Designed by Evolve, London. Printed by the colourhouse, London. Photography: Front and Back cover images by James O. Davies. This document is printed on recycled paper. 51152 HERITAGE COUNTS Heritage Counts 2005 The regional context 2005 The State of the EAST MIDLANDS in the East Midlands Historic Environment Cover image: The This year’s Heritage Counts report addresses the heritage in our countryside. Hunsbury Hill Centre, Heritage Counts 2005 is the fourth state of the historic environment Northamptonshire: This emphasis on the rural historic environment is timely. It not only coincides A Grade II listed farmhouse and ancillary report. It provides new information and analysis on the condition of with a major restructuring of the principal government organisations buildings, located near to the Iron Age hillfort heritage assets in the East Midlands, the pressures they face and the social responsible for the management of the countryside, but also with the launch of Hunsbury Hill.