DOCSLIB.ORG

Farmed Sandstone Hills and Heaths

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Farmed Sandstone Hills and Heaths Landscape Character Assessment of Cannock Chase District A report produced by Ashmead Price and Steven Warnock on behalf of Cannock Chase Council March 2009 1 Landscape Character Assessment of Cannock Chase District Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 4 Aim of Study Background information Approach and methodology The Study Area (Figure 1) 2. Landscape Character Assessment ................................................................... 9 Introduction and Key Plans (Figures 2 &3) Sandstone Hills and Heaths .............................................................................. 12 Description and Key Characteristics Photographs and LDU/ LCP plan Strength of Character Summary of Condition and Landscape Condition table Vision Statement Sensitivity SH01, SH05, SH18 Land Cover Parcels table Wooded Estatelands .......................................................................................... 19 Description and Key Characteristics Photographs and LDU/ LCP plan Strength of Character Summary of Condition and Landscape Condition table Vision Statement Sensitivity WE07 Land Cover Parcels table Settled Farmlands ............................................................................................... 24 Description and Key Characteristics Photographs and LDU/ LCP plan Strength of Character Summary of Condition and Landscape Condition table Vision Statement Sensitivity SF15, SF16, SF17, SF28, SF29 Land Cover Parcels table Coalfield Farmlands ........................................................................................... 31 Description and Key Characteristics Photographs and LDU/ LCP plan Strength of Character Summary of Condition and Landscape Condition table Vision Statement Sensitivity CF19, CF24, CF26 Land Cover Parcels table Planned Coalfield Farmlands ............................................................................ 38 Description and Key Characteristics Photograph and LDU/ LCP plan Strength of Character Summary of Condition and Landscape Condition table Vision Statement 2 Sensitivity CP21, CP22 Land Cover Parcels table River Meadowlands ............................................................................................ 48 Description and Key Characteristics Photographs and LDU/ LCP plan Strength of Character Summary of Condition and Landscape Condition table Vision Statement Sensitivity RM13, RM14 Land Cover Parcels table Urban Areas ........................................................................................................ 52 Introduction UR02, UR08, UR10, UR27 Land Cover Parcels table Ashmead Price 16 Bond End Yoxall Burton on Trent Staffordshire DE13 8NH Tel 01543 473222 www.ashmeadprice.co.uk 3 1. Introduction Aim of study Cannock Chase Council is in the process of developing its Local Development Framework. The principal document, the Core Strategy underwent three Issues and Options consultations during 2006, 2007 and 2008 and a Preferred Options consultation is planned for April 2009. The Council require a District Level Landscape Character Assessment, in order to gain a clearer picture of the landscape outside the Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). This work will contribute to the production of the Council’s Core Strategy, which will ultimately set out the strategic approach for where future new development in the District should be directed. This study and supporting analysis will assist the Council in identifying areas for landscape conservation, improvement, or regeneration and in setting a baseline for future monitoring. Background information Staffordshire County Council has produced a Landscape Character Assessment which has been used as supporting documentation for the Staffordshire and Stoke on Trent Structure Plan 1996. The County Council has also produced a document of more specific relevance to Cannock Chase District, largely based on the County Level assessment of the Cannock Chase and Cank Wood Joint Landscape Character Area (Countryside Character Volume 5: West Midlands – The Countryside Agency). More detailed Landscape Character Areas have also been identified in the Cannock Chase AONB Management Plan, which is currently being reviewed. Cannock Chase Council wish to develop the County Level Assessment by: i. Updating information on the landscape character types within Cannock Chase District. ii. Obtaining a more detailed breakdown of the Landscape Character types at a District Level. iii. Integrating with the District Level Historic Landscape Characterisation as part of the Assessment. iv. Identifying landscape sensitivities to development in terms of conservation, enhancement and regeneration. Approach and methodology The process of landscape characterisation involves a combination of desk study and field survey to systematically divide the countryside into discrete and relatively homogenous units of land, within which the constituent physical, biological and historical elements occur in repeating patterns and share certain aesthetic characteristics. These units of land, termed Land description units (LDUs), are the building blocks of the landscape and they form the framework on which all subsequent evaluation and decision making is based. This study started with the existing county (1:50,000) LDU dataset and refined this to a greater level of detail. LDU boundaries were adjusted to follow map based features, such as roads and field boundaries. The codes defining each LDU were also checked and where necessary, amended. This resulted in the definition of a new landscape type in the coalfield area. 4 LCP Mapping Land description units can be sub-divided into smaller Land Cover Parcels (LCPs), based on differences in land cover and historic pattern. The land cover analysis identified features within each LDU, such as areas of parkland, larger woodlands, patches of disturbed land, smaller urban areas and other non-agricultural land. The county based historic (HLC) analysis was used to help identify parish boundaries and areas of farmland with different sizes/patterns of fields. A Level 2 LDU map had already been produced for Staffordshire and the study refined the Level 2 LDUs and subdivided them into smaller Level 3 (1:25,000) Land Cover Parcels (LCPs). Land Cover Parcels are sub-units of LDUs, and are derived with reference to HLC, farm census information, 1:25,000 OS base maps and parish boundaries, to ensure that broad patterns of ownership, field pattern and landscape development are defined. These units provide a better scale of unit at which to most appropriately assess capacity and condition. The LCP’s covered the District, excluding the AONB and the built up areas, and extended into adjacent authority areas where an overlap occurred. Field Survey Field assessment followed the mapping to gather additional information on each of the LCPs. Field survey built on the map analysis by providing essential information about the visual dimension of the landscape that could not be gained from the desk study. The primary function of the field survey was to identify the key characteristics that contribute to local distinctiveness; and to gather information about the condition of the landscape, in particular the impact of recent change. The condition, of a landscape, which should be clearly distinguished from its character, is a measure of how far removed that landscape is from an ‘optimal’ state, where all the key characteristics are present and functioning. Condition, therefore, has a functional as well as a visual dimension. The latter reflects the degree to which the existing landscape pattern appears visually fragmented, due to the loss of existing features, or the imposition of new features which appear ‘out of place’. The functional dimension embraces a range of issues related to the ecological health of the countryside and the extent to which present day land use respects the inherent ecological/cultural character of the land. A key task of the field survey was to produce an informed assessment of the forces for change within each of the LCPs defined by the desk study. A standard field sheet was used to identify: key landscape characteristics (natural and cultural); condition and evidence for change. At a detailed level there are numerous other factors that come into play including visual and perceptual matters and the relationship of the landscape to settlement. A key task of the field survey was to produce an informed assessment of the forces for change within each of the LCPs defined by the desk study. These were all considered as criteria on a standard proforma. The LCP’s will help define the basis for site assessment in the future, so that if a site is split by more than one LCP, a proforma would be filled out for each sub- division. If a site lies fully within an LCP, one proforma would be completed for that site. The field survey was undertaken in February 2009, using the LDU and LCP desk study map, with each area referenced and numbered. The field survey was carried out by driving and walking along public roads, bridleways and footpaths. The field sheets were filled in at the time and photographs taken to record ‘typical’ conditions. Categories of condition were derived from the field notes descriptions of each LDU, and a qualitative value was assigned as Good, Medium or Poor. Issues were assessed under the headings of field boundaries and trees; land use or land cover, ecological integrity and the impact of built
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley March 2019
    Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley March 2019 Rugeley B Power Station, Rugeley Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report Volume 1 – Main Statement (Update) On behalf of Rugeley Power Limited Contents CHAPTER 1: ................................................................................... INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 2: ............................................................................. SITE DESCRIPTION CHAPTER 3: .............................................................. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 4: ................................................................................... EIA APPROACH CHAPTER 5: .............................. ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS AND CONSULTATION CHAPTER 6: ........................................................................... SOCIO-ECONOMICS CHAPTER 7: ....................................................................................... AIR QUALITY CHAPTER 8: .................................................................................. ARCHAEOLOGY CHAPTER 9: ................................................................................ BUILT HERITAGE CHAPTER 10: .......................................................................................... ECOLOGY CHAPTER 11: ..................... WATER ENVIRONMENT (INCLUDING FLOOD RISK) CHAPTER 12: .................................................................... NOISE AND VIBRATION CHAPTER 13: ..................................................................... GROUND CONDITIONS CHAPTER 14: .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase to Sutton Park Draft Green Infrastructure Action Plan
    Cannock Chase to Sutton Park Draft Green Infrastructure Action Plan Stafford East Staffordshire South Derbyshire Cannock Chase Lichfield South Staffordshire Tam wo r t h Walsall Wo lver ha mp ton North Warwickshire Sandwell Dudley Birmingham Stafford East Staffordshire South Derbyshire Cannock Chase Lichfield South Staffordshire Tam wor t h Wa l s al l Wo lv e r ha mpt on North Warwickshire Sandwell Dudley Birmingham Stafford East Staffordshire South Derbyshire Cannock Chase Lichfield South Staffordshire Ta m wo r t h Walsall Wo lverha mpton North Warwickshire Sandwell Dudley Birmingham Prepared for Natural England by Land Use Consultants July 2009 Cannock Chase to Sutton Park Draft Green Infrastructure Action Plan Prepared for Natural England by Land Use Consultants July 2009 43 Chalton Street London NW1 1JD Tel: 020 7383 5784 Fax: 020 7383 4798 [email protected] CONTENTS 1. Introduction........................................................................................ 1 Purpose of this draft plan..........................................................................................................................1 A definition of Green Infrastructure.......................................................................................................3 Report structure .........................................................................................................................................4 2. Policy and strategic context .............................................................. 5 Policy review method.................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase District Nature Recovery Network Mapping
    Cannock Chase District Nature Recovery Network Mapping View across Cannock Chase District from Etching Hill © SWT FINAL REPORT Staffordshire Wildlife Trust 2020 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 2. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Review of previous biodiversity opportunity mapping assessments ................................... 6 4. Existing evidence base review ............................................................................................ 7 4.1 Available environmental datasets .................................................................................. 7 4.2 Phase 1 habitat mapping via aerial photography interpretation .................................... 7 4.3 National Character Areas in Cannock Chase District .................................................... 8 4.4 Minerals Safeguarding Zones in Cannock Chase District ............................................. 9 4.5 Data used and limitations ............................................................................................ 10 5. Mapping the opportunities to enhance habitats for biodiversity ........................................ 11 5.1 Habitat distinctiveness mapping .................................................................................. 11 5.2 Habitat distinctiveness mapping limitations ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Environment Character Area Overview Reports This Appendix
    Appendix 2: Historic Environment Character Area Overview Reports This appendix provides an overview of the historic environment for each of the Historic Environment Character Areas (HECAs) which fall within Lichfield District. It should be noted that the information and any recommendations contained within each of the documents is subject to amendment should any new information become available. For further information regarding the Historic Environment Record (HER); Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) and designated sites please contact: Cultural Heritage Team Environment & Countryside Development Services Directorate Staffordshire County Council Riverway Stafford ST16 3TJ Tel: 01785 277281/277285/277290 Email: [email protected] Staffordshire County Council February 2009 1 Historic Environment Character Area (HECA) 2a Introduction This document forms an overview of the HECA which specifically addresses the potential impact of medium to large scale development upon the historic environment. The character area covers 5,645ha lies wholly within Lichfield District boundary and to the west of Tamworth. Archaeological and Historic Documentation Archaeological work within the character area has tended to concentrate along the A5 and the M6 (Toll) roads. The information on this character area mostly comes from the HER data, whilst VCH has covered part of the area. Historic Environment Assets Summary The current understanding on the later prehistoric landscape of the character area suggests that it had mostly been heavily wooded until Bronze Age, when some clearance may have begun to take place to support a small scale pastoral economy. The earliest evidence for human activity from the character area dates to the Mesolithic period; however, this comes from flint artefacts and probably represents the presence of mobile hunting groups and transitory occupation.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Review: Scope, Issues & Options
    Scope, Issues & Options April 2018 Lichfield District Local Plan Review: Scope, Issues & Options Introduction & Context 1 Introduction & Context 3 Spatial Portrait & Issues 2 Spatial Portrait of Lichfield District 11 3 Issues 24 Contents Vision & Strategic Objectives 4 Promoting a clear vision 25 5 Strategic Objectives 27 Spatial Development Options for Growth 6 What types & levels of Growth are Needed? 30 7 Where should Growth Take Place? 39 8 Residential Growth Option 1: Town Focused Development 42 9 Residential Growth Option 2: Town & Key Rural Villages Focused Development 46 10 Residential Growth Option 3: Dispersed Development 49 11 Residential Growth Option 4: New Settlement Development 52 12 Employment Growth Option 1: Expansion of existing employment locations 55 13 Employment Growth Option 2: New Locations 58 14 How do Growth Options meet the issues identified? 61 15 Alternative Options 62 Appendices A Evidence Base 63 B Review of Existing Local Plan Policies 68 C Monitoring Framework 78 D Infrastructure Delivery Plan 80 Glossary & Abbreviations Glossary & Abbreviations 85 Introduction & Context 2 Lichfield District Local Plan Review: Scope, Issues & Options 3 1 Introduction & Context Introduction - What is a Local Plan? 1.1 A Local Plan is a document produced by the Local Planning Authority (hereafter Lichfield District Council) and shows how an area will develop in the future. Local Plans set out the vision and framework for the future development of the area, seeking to address needs and opportunities in relation to Context housing, the economy, community facilities and infrastructure as well as safeguarding important environments. Additionally, a Local Plan provides policies which will guide decisions on whether or & not planning applications can be granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Lichfield District Local Plan Allocations (Focused Changes)
    Lichfield District Local Plan Allocations (Focused Changes) 1 Introduction 6 Local Plan Allocations Policies 2 Infrastructure 11 3 Sustainable Transport 13 4 Homes for the Future 14 Contents 5 Economic Development & Enterprise 17 6 Natural Resources 21 7 Built & Historic Environment 24 8 Lichfield City (incl. Streethay) 26 9 Burntwood 51 10 North of Tamworth 64 11 East of Rugeley 66 12 Key Rural Settlements 68 13 Other Rural 84 Appendices A Schedule of Deleted Policies 92 B Changes to Local Plan Strategy 94 C Implementation & Monitoring 95 D Housing Trajectory 96 E Rugeley Power Station Concept Statement 97 Glossary Glossary 102 Lichfield District Local Plan Allocations (Focused Changes) Contents Policies Policy IP2: Lichfield Canal 11 Policy ST3: Road Line Safeguarding 13 Policy ST4: Road and Junction Improvements - Lichfield City 13 Policy ST5: Road and Junction Improvements - Fradley 13 Policy EMP1: Employment Areas & Allocations 18 Policy E2: Service Access to our Centres 19 Policy E3: Shop fronts and advertisements 20 Policy NR10: Cannock Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 21 Policy NR11: National Forest 23 Policy BE2: Heritage Assets 24 Policy Lichfield 3: Lichfield Economy 26 Policy LC1: Lichfield City Housing Land Allocations 28 Policy LC2: Lichfield City Mixed-use Allocations 29 Policy Burntwood 3: Burntwood Economy 51 Policy B1: Burntwood Housing Land Allocations 53 Policy B2: Burntwood Mixed-use Allocations 53 Policy NT1: North of Tamworth Housing Land Allocations 64 Policy R1: East of Rugeley Housing Land Allocations
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase AONB State of the AONB Report 2018
    Cannock Chase AONB State of the AONB Report 2018 Final Report Prepared by LUC for Cannock Chase AONB August 2018 Project Title: Cannock Chase AONB: State of the AONB Report 2018 Client: Cannock Chase AONB Partnership Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by 0.1 04/06/2018 Draft Report structure Maria Grant Diana Manson Diana Manson 1.0 11/07/2018 Draft Report Maria Grant Diana Manson Diana Manson Isabelle King 2.0 14/08/2018 Final Report Maria Grant Diana Manson Diana Manson Isabelle King 3.0 29/08/2018 Final Report – Maria Grant Diana Manson Diana Manson amendments following comments Cannock Chase AONB State of the AONB Report 2018 Final Report Prepared by LUC for Cannock Chase AONB August 2018 Planning & EIA LUC BRISTOL Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Design 12th Floor Colston Tower Edinburgh Registered in England Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Colston Street Bristol Glasgow Registered Office: Landscape Management BS1 4XE Lancaster 43 Chalton Street Ecology T +44 (0)117 929 1997 London London NW1 1JD GIS & Visualisation [email protected] Manchester FS 566056 EMS 566057 LUC uses 100% recycled paper Contents 1 Introduction 1 Cannock Chase AONB: A nationally important landscape 1 Purpose of the State of the AONB Report 2 Structure of this report 2 2 Method 6 Stage 1: Identification of available data and development of indicators 6 Stage 2: Obtaining and processing available data and information 6 Stage 3: Analysis and reporting 6 3 Landscape Character and Planning 9 Statement of significance
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Strategy 2020
    APPENDIX A CONTAMINATED LAND STRATEGY 2020 FEBRUARY 2020 CONTENTS 1 INTRODRODUCTION AND LEGISLATIVE 1 CONTEXT 1.1 Background To The Legislation 1.2 Terminology 3 1.3 Relevant Legislation 1.3.1 Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part 2A 1.3.2 Town and Country Planning Acts 5 1.3.3 The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations 2009 1.3.4 Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010 (as 6 amended) 1.3.5 Water Resource Act 1991 2 POLICY CONTEXT 2.1 European Union Policy 2.2 Central Government Policy 6 2.2.1 Contaminated Land Statutory Guidance 2.2.2 National Planning Policy Framework 7-9 2.3 Regional Government Policy 2.3.1 Staffordshire County Council Policy 2.3.2 The Minerals Local Plan 1994-2006 2.3.3 Lichfield District Council Planning Policy 3 STRATEGY OUTLINE 3.1 Roles and Responsibilities 3.1.1 Lichfield District Council 3.1.2 The Environment Agency 9 3.1.3 Other Agencies 10 3.2 Aims and Objectives 3.3 Priorities 3.4 Addressing Contamination 11 4 THE DISTRICT OF LICHFIELD DISTRICT COUNCIL 4.1 Geographical Location 4.2 Brief Description of Lichfield District 12 4.3 Historical Development 13 4.4 Size 14 4.5 Population Distribution 4.6 Current and Past Industrial History 4.7 Roads, Canals and Railways 4.8 Burntwood 15 4.9 Lichfield 16 4.10 Other Areas 17 4.11 Geological Characteristics 4.12 Key Water Resource/ Protection Issues 19 4.13 Hydrogeology 20 4.14 Hydrology 21 4.15 Natural Contamination 4.15.1 Radon 4.15.2 Methane, Carbon Dioxide and Oil Susceptibility 4.16 Soil Geochemistry 22 4.17 Protected Locations 23 5 STRATEGIC
    [Show full text]
  • Drought Plan
    Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................. 3 1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS ........................................................................ 3 1.2 THE SOUTH STAFFS REGION DROUGHT PLAN ................................................ 4 1.3 BACKGROUND TO SOUTH STAFFS WATER ..................................................... 6 2 CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT DROUGHT PLAN .................. 7 2.1 PRE CONSULTATION ..................................................................................... 7 2.2 CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT PLAN ........................................................... 10 3 WATER RESOURCES IN THE SOUTH STAFFS REGION ......... 13 3.1 SUPPLY DEMAND BALANCE POSITION .......................................................... 13 3.2 LEVELS OF SERVICE – FREQUENCY OF RESTRICTIONS .................................. 13 3.3 COMPENSATION ......................................................................................... 14 3.4 DEPLOYABLE OUTPUT ................................................................................ 14 3.5 SUMMARY OF RECENT INVESTMENT............................................................. 15 3.6 LEAKAGE AND EFFICIENT USE OF WATER ...................................................... 15 4 DROUGHT SCENARIOS .............................................................. 17 4.1 DROUGHT SCENARIOS COVERED BY THIS PLAN ............................................ 17 4.2 RESILIENCE AGAINST HISTORIC DROUGHTS ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Authority Monitoring Report 2018
    Authority Monitoring Report 2018 July 2018 Authority Monitoring Report 2018 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Introduction: Spatial Portrait 5 3 Sustainable Communities 11 4 Infrastructure 12 5 Sustainable Transport 15 6 Homes for the Future 18 7 Economic Development & Enterprise 27 8 Healthy & Safe Communities 32 9 Natural Resources 35 10 Built & Historic Environment 46 11 Neighbourhood Plans & Community Engagement 49 A Indicator Changes 55 Glossary 57 July 2018 1 Executive Summary 1.1 The 2018 Lichfield District Authority Monitoring Report (AMR) covers the period 1st April 2017 - 31st March 2018. This report monitors the effectiveness of the authorities policies set out in the Local Plan Strategy. 1.2 The AMR is structured to reflect the chapters of the Local Plan, and therefore can be read in conjunction with the Local Plan. The Local Plan Strategy was adopted on 17th February 2015. 1.3 This report covers a range of topic areas to provide a picture of the social, environmental and economic geography of Lichfield District. Monitoring is hugely important to the planning process as it provides a review of any successes or failures, this enables the authority to assess how policies are responding to the issues within the District. Summary 1.4 The following sections provide a summary of the key findings of this report. Sustainable Communities There has been one new planning permission granted this year for small scale renewable energy installations, and one application for the retention of ground mounted solar panels. Infrastructure Progress has been made on a number of items of infrastructure this year with many projects being completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Environment Assessment 2015
    Historic Environment Assessment Cannock Chase AONB June 2015 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT Staffordshire County Council EC4609 Document No: Status: Final Rev. No: 3 Name Signature Date Prepared by: Debbie Taylor 31/03/2015 and Stephen Dean SCC Approved: Stephen Dean 24/06/2015 Checked by: Suzy Bake 26/06/2015 Revision Record Rev. Date By Summary of Changes Chkd Aprvd 1. 09/15 RH CCAONB Team amendments 2. 12/15 CCDC, Comments on draft report from CCDC IS, ND officers, Ian Stimpson and Norreen Davidson. 3. Copyright © Staffordshire County Council Historic Environment Team Staffordshire County Council Office Location: No. 1 Staffordshire Place, Stafford, ST16 2LP Postal Address: Wedgwood Building, Block A, Tipping Street, Stafford, ST16 2DH Tel: 01785 277285 Email: [email protected] Mapping in this volume is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationary Office © Crown copyright and/or database right 2015 all rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Staffordshire County Council Licence No. 100019422 March 2015 2 Contents: 1 Introduction and background ......................................................................................... 5 1.1 Aims and Objectives ................................................................................................ 7 2 Resource Assessment .................................................................................................... 7 3 Landscape and Topography
    [Show full text]
  • European Designated Sites - Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)
    European designated sites - Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Cannock Extension Canal • Site map • JNCC site summary description • Natura2000 data form • Citation for SAC • Site conservation objectives – Key principles • Site conservation objectives - Supplementary advice document • Site improvement plan Cannock Chase • Site map • JNCC site summary description • Natura2000 data form • Citation for SAC • Site conservation objectives – Key principles • Site conservation objectives - Supplementary advice document • Site improvement plan • National Character Area profile – Cannock Chase and Cank Wood Mottey Meadows • Site map • JNCC site summary description • Natura2000 data form • Citation for SAC • Site conservation objectives – Key principles • Site conservation objectives - Supplementary advice document • Site improvement plan Cannock Extension Canal Site details Location of Cannock Extension Canal SAC/SCI/cSAC Country England Unitary Authority Shropshire and Staffordshire, West Midlands Centroid* SK020058 Latitude 52.64972222 Longitude -1.970555556 SAC EU code UK0012672 Status Designated Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Area (ha) 5 * This is the approximate central point of the SAC. In the case of large, linear or composite sites, this may not represent the location where a feature occurs within the SAC. General site character Inland water bodies (Standing water, Running water) (75%) Humid grassland, Mesophile grassland (10%) Broad-leaved deciduous woodland (4.9%) Other land (including Towns, Villages, Roads, Waste places, Mines, Industrial sites) (10.1%) Natura 2000 standard data form for this site as submitted to Europe (PDF, < 100kb). Interactive map from MAGIC (Multi-Agency Geographic Information for the Countryside). Note: When undertaking an appropriate assessment of impacts at a site, all features of European importance (both primary and non-primary) need to be considered.
    [Show full text]