DOCSLIB.ORG

Pot-Tampico-Julio-2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pot-Tampico-Julio-2011 PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS GOBIERNO DEL ESTADO PODER EJECUTIVO SECRETARIA GENERAL R. AYUNTAMIENTO DE TAMPICO, TAM. PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS. 1 PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS CONTENIDO 1.ANTECEDENTES .................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 INTRODUCCIÓN ............................................................................................................... 5 1.2 FUNDAMENTACIÓN JURÍDICA ...................................................................................... 6 1.3 DELIMITACIÓN DEL ÁREA DE ESTUDIO .................................................................... 10 2.DIAGNÓSTICO PRONÓSTICO ............................................................................................. 11 2.1 ÁMBITO REGIONAL ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1. INFRAESTRUCTURA DE COMUNICACIÓN .......................................................................... 11 2.1.2. TRANSPORTE FERROVIARIO ............................................................................................ 12 2.1.3. TRANSPORTE MARÍTIMO.................................................................................................. 13 2.1.4. TRANSPORTE AÉREO ...................................................................................................... 13 2.2 MEDIO FÍSICO NATURAL .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1. CLIMA ............................................................................................................................. 14 2.2.2. VEGETACIÓN Y USOS DE SUELO ..................................................................................... 19 2.2.3. TOPOGRAFÍA .................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.4. EDAFOLOGÍA .................................................................................................................. 20 2.2.5. HIDROLOGÍA ................................................................................................................... 21 2.2.6. GEOLOGÍA ...................................................................................................................... 24 2.3. ASPECTOS SOCIOECONÓMICOS ............................................................................ 26 2.3.1. DEMOGRAFÍA .................................................................................................................. 26 2.3.2. EDUCACIÓN .................................................................................................................... 31 2.3.3. INGRESO ........................................................................................................................ 34 2.3.4. POBLACIÓN ECONÓMICAMENTE ACTIVA (PEA) ............................................................... 34 2.4. ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS ..................................................................................... 37 2.5. MEDIO FÍSICO TRANSFORMADO .............................................................................. 41 2.5.1. ASPECTOS GENERALES DE LA EVOLUCIÓN ECONÓMICA, TERRITORIAL Y DEMOGRÁFICA 41 2.5.3. USOS DE SUELO ............................................................................................................. 45 2.5.4. ESTRUCTURA VIAL.......................................................................................................... 47 2.5.5. TRANSPORTE ................................................................................................................. 51 2 PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS 2.5.6. IMAGEN URBANA ............................................................................................................ 53 2.5.7. INFRAESTRUCTURA ......................................................................................................... 56 2.5.8. RIESGOS Y VULNERABILIDAD .......................................................................................... 58 2.5.9. VIVIENDA ........................................................................................................................ 60 2.5.11. PATRIMONIO HISTÓRICO ............................................................................................... 69 3.DIAGNÓSTICO–PRONÓSTICO INTEGRADO .................................................................... 76 4.ESTRATEGIA DE DESARROLLO URBANO ...................................................................... 78 4.1. IMAGEN OBJETIVO ...................................................................................................... 78 4.2. ESTRATEGIA DE INTEGRACIÓN AL ÁMBITO REGIONAL ..................................... 79 4.3. ESTRATEGIA DEMOGRÁFICA ................................................................................... 79 4.4. ESTRATEGIA DE ESTRUCTURA URBANA ............................................................... 79 4.5. ESTRATEGIA DE VIALIDAD Y TRANSPORTE .......................................................... 80 4.6. ESTRATEGIA DE IMAGEN URBANA .......................................................................... 81 4.7. ESTRATEGIA DE INFRAESTRUCTURA .................................................................... 82 4.8. ESTRATEGIA DE VIVIENDA ........................................................................................ 82 4.9. ESTRATEGIA DE EQUIPAMIENTO Y SERVICIOS ................................................... 83 4.10.ESTRATEGIA PARA EL ÁMBITO NATURAL ............................................................. 84 5.ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL ......................................................................................... 85 5.1. ZONIFICACIÓN Y DISTRIBUCIÓN DE USOS DEL SUELO ...................................... 85 5.2. NORMAS DE ORDENACIÓN URBANA .................................................................... 135 5.3. NORMAS DE ORDENACIÓN DE IMAGEN URBANA .............................................. 148 5.4. NORMAS DE ORDENACIÓN COMPLEMENTARIA ................................................ 158 6.ACCIONES ESTRATÉGICAS ................................................................................................ 166 6.1. PROYECTOS ESPECÍFICOS .................................................................................... 166 6.2. PROGRAMAS .............................................................................................................. 170 6.3. PROYECTOS ESTRATÉGICOS ................................................................................ 173 7.INSTRUMENTOS DE EJECUCIÓN ...................................................................................... 183 7.1. INSTRUMENTOS JURÍDICOS ................................................................................... 183 3 PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS 7.2. INSTRUMENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS .................................................................... 183 7.3. INSTRUMENTOS FINANCIEROS ............................................................................. 185 7.4. INSTRUMENTOS DE EVALUACIÓN ......................................................................... 186 7.5. INSTRUMENTOS DE PARTICIPACIÓN CIUDADANA ............................................ 187 8.- ANEXOS GRAFICOS PLANOS DIAGNÓSTICO TAMPICO CLAVE GEOLOGÍA DT-1 EDAFOLOGIA DT-2 FASE QUIMICA DT-3 HIDROLOGÌA DT-4 SUBCUENCAS DT-5 CLIMAS DT-6 PENDIENTES DT-7 MODELO DE TERRENO DT-8 IMAGEN SATELITAL DT-9 USO DE SUELO Y VEGETACIÓN DT-10 FRAGILIDAD DT-11 APTITUD NATURAL DT-12 APTITUD TERRITORIAL DT-13 PROPIEDAD EJIDAL DT-14 ZONAS PROPENSAS A INUNDACIONES DT-15 USO ADECUADO DT-16 DIAGNOSTICO AMBIENTAL DT-17 PLANOS ESTRATÉGICOS TAMPICO CLAVE ÁREA DE ESTUDIO MUNICIPIO DE TAMPICO ET-1 ZONIFICACIÓN SECUNDARIA ET-2 ESTRUCTURA VIAL ET-3 CORREDORES URBANOS ET-4 MÓDULOS ET-5 SUBCUENCAS HIDROLÓGICAS MUNICIPIO DE TAMPICO ET-6 4 PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS 1. ANTECEDENTES 1.1 INTRODUCCIÓN El Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2007-2012 establece como premisa básica la búsqueda del desarrollo humano sustentable, plantea elementos primordiales para establecer un sistema de planeación integral y un marco de relaciones intergubernamentales para fomentar la equidad y el desarrollo de nuestra Nación. Mediante estas iniciativas, el Ayuntamiento de Tampico y el Instituto Metropolitano de Planeación del Sur de Tamaulipas (IMEPLAN), con el apoyo del Programa de las Naciones Unidas para los Asentamientos Humanos ONU-HABITAT y en coordinación con el Gobierno del Estado de Tamaulipas, buscan articular los objetivos de la política social con los de las políticas de desarrollo urbano, y cumplir con los objetivos del “Desarrollo del Milenio” de ese Programa. En este marco de acciones se da origen al Programa Municipal de Ordenamiento Territorial y Desarrollo Urbano de Tampico, Tamaulipas, que se presenta en este documento como una respuesta a las necesidades de planeación urbana y de ordenamiento territorial del municipio. 5 PROGRAMA MUNICIPAL DE ORDENAMIENTO TERRITORIAL Y DESARROLLO URBANO DE TAMPICO, TAMAULIPAS 1.2 FUNDAMENTACIÓN JURÍDICA El Programa Municipal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Victoria, Tam., Jueves 31 De Enero De 2019
    PERIÓDICO OFICIAL ÓRGANO DEL GOBIERNO CONSTITUCIONAL DEL ESTADO LIBRE Y SOBERANO DE TAMAULIPAS Registro Postal publicación periódica Periódico Oficial del Estado RESPONSABLE PP28-0009 TAMAULIPAS SECRETARÍA GENERAL DE GOBIERNO AUTORIZADO POR SEPOMEX TOMO CXLIV Victoria, Tam., jueves 31 de enero de 2019. Anexo al Número 15 GOBIERNO DEL ESTADO PODER EJECUTIVO SECRETARÍA GENERAL PLAN Municipal de Desarrollo 2018-2021 del municipio de Victoria, Tamaulipas……………………………………………………………....... 2 Página 2 Victoria, Tam., jueves 31 de enero de 2019 Periódico Oficial GOBIERNO DEL ESTADO PODER EJECUTIVO SECRETARÍA GENERAL R. AYUNTAMIENTO VICTORIA, TAM. En la Cuarta Sesión Ordinaria de Cabildo de fecha 27 de Diciembre de 2018, se aprobó el Plan Municipal de Desarrollo 2018 – 2021 del Municipio de Victoria, Tamaulipas. PLAN MUNICIPAL DE DESARROLLO 2018•2021 GOBIERNO DE VICTORIA, TAMAULIPAS CONTENIDO PRESENTACIÓN INTRODUCCIÓN MARCO JURÍDICO METODOLOGÍA FILOSOFÍA DEL GOBIERNO MUNICIPAL DIAGNÓSTICO EJE 1 GOBIERNO DE EXCELENCIA EJE 2 SERVICIOS PÚBLICOS DE MEJOR CALIDAD EJE 3 BIENESTAR SOCIAL INTEGRAL E INCLUYENTE EJE 4 DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO ORDENADO EJE 5 CRECIMIENTO ORDENADO Y SOSTENIBLE ENFOQUES TRANSVERSALES EVALUACIÓN ANEXO 1 ANEXO 2 ANEXO 3 REFERENCIAS PRESENTACIÓN Dr. Xicoténcatl González Urestí Presidente Municipal de Victoria Si, trabajamos para convertir a Victoria en una capital referente, queremos que el mundo voltee a vernos como una sociedad libre, disruptiva, que tomó su responsabilidad cívica y transformó su cultura, basándose en un despertar de consciencias, con intelecto, corazón, capacidad y excelencia. Nací libre y libre soy. El Plan Municipal de Desarrollo 2018-2021, es la culminación de un proceso de planeación que se llevó a cabo conforme lo establece el marco legal del Sistema Nacional de Planeación Democrática.
    [Show full text]
  • “Control...Over the Entire State of Coahuila” an Analysis of Testimonies in Trials Against Zeta Members in San Antonio, Austin, and Del Rio, Texas
    “Control...Over the Entire State of Coahuila” An analysis of testimonies in trials against Zeta members in San Antonio, Austin, and Del Rio, Texas NOVEMBER 2017 This report does not represent the official position of the School of Law or the University of Texas, and the views presented here reflect only the opinions of the individual authors and of the Human Rights Clinic 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................. 5 A. Project Description And Purpose ............................................... 5 B. The Trials ................................................................... 6 I. The San Antonio Trial..................................................... 6 II. The Austin Trials ......................................................... 7 III. The Del Rio Trial ......................................................... 9 C. Background Information ...................................................... 9 I. Mexico’s Security Strategy ................................................. 9 II. Coahuila, Mexico ......................................................... 10 III. Brief History of the Zeta Cartel ............................................. 11 3. FINDINGS ON THE ZETA CARTEL STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS ......................... 13 A. Hierarchy and Organization. .................................................. 13 B. Most Important Zeta Members Based on Testimonies .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas-Tamaulipas-Nuevo León-Coahuila: Energized to Build a Stronger Border Region Christopher Wilson, Erik Lee and Rick Van Schoik*
    The U.S.-Mexico Border Economy in Transition July 2014 Texas-Tamaulipas-Nuevo León-Coahuila: Energized to Build a Stronger Border Region Christopher Wilson, Erik Lee and Rick Van Schoik* Findings from the Texas-Tamaulipas-Nuevo border is still closing in on the vision established by León-Coahuila Regional Economic CSG-West almost 10 years ago. At that time, CSG- Competitiveness Forum West envisioned secure manufacturing zones, high- priority corridors and more environmentally On July 1st, 2014 federal, state, and local friendly vehicles as part of a vision of a green, stakeholders from the southern portion of the Texas- secure, and productive border. Mexico border convened at Texas A&M Congressman Henry Cuellar gave the keynote International University in Laredo for the Regional address and cited the figure that 40% of all U.S. Economic Competitiveness Forum. The forum was production heads south, indicating that more jointly hosted by the Border Legislative Conference, national attention needed to be paid not only to our Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars southern border but to all of our neighbors in Latin Mexico Institute, North American Research America. He went on to note that the U.S.-Mexico Partnership, and the Office of Congressman Henry High-Level Economic Dialogue is meant to make the Cuellar, and made possible by the support of the southern border a more seamless and productive U.S. Agency for International Development – commercial zone. Mexico. Building on successful sessions earlier this year in San Diego and Nogales, it was designed to The Region generate new ideas on how to strengthen the The South Texas-Mexico border region stands out competitiveness of the border region.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born in and out of Wedlock
    Report for the Executive Office for Immigration Review LL Files Nos. 2017-014922 through 2017-014953 Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born In and Out of Wedlock (Update) August 2017 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) • (866) 550-0442 (fax) • [email protected] • http://www.law.gov Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Aguascalientes .................................................................................................................................2 Baja California .................................................................................................................................4 Baja California Sur ..........................................................................................................................6 Campeche .........................................................................................................................................8 Chiapas ...........................................................................................................................................10 Chihuahua ......................................................................................................................................12 Coahuila .........................................................................................................................................14 Colima ............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Castniidae (Lepidoptera) from Queretaro and Tamaulipas, Mexico
    NiñoISSN Maldonado0065-1737 et al.: Registros de Castniidae en QuerétaroActa y Tamaulipas Zoológica Mexicana (n.s.), 29(2): 452-453 (2013) Nota Científica (Short Communication) NEW RECORDS OF CASTNIIDAE (LEPIDOPTERA) FROM QUERETARO AND TAMAULIPAS, MEXICO Niño Maldonado, S., De León González, E. I., Miller, J. Y. & Sánchez Reyes, U. J. 2013. Nuevos registros de Castniidae (Lepidoptera) para los estados de Querétaro y Tamaulipas, México. Acta Zoológica Mexicana (n. s.), 29(2): 452-453. RESUMEN. Se colectaron nueve ejemplares pertenecientes a dos especies de la familia Castniidae: Athis delecta (Shaus, 1911) (un ejemplar) fue registrada en vegetación de Matorral y Athis inca oriza- bensis (Strand, 1913) (ocho ejemplares) en Selva baja subcaducifolia con elementos de Encino y Bosque mesófilo. Athis delecta representa un nuevo registro para Tamaulipas, mientras que la segunda especie se reafirma para Tamaulipas, pero es nuevo registro para Querétaro. The taxonomic knowledge of this family is limited mainly because they are very rare in natural ecosystems, their endemism, small geographical distribution, scarcity of specimens in scientific collections (Miller 1972, González & Fernández-Yépez 1993, Lamas 1993), and also there are limited studies on the group. Castniid moths are medium to large in size, from 20 to 110 mm; they are related to Cossidae and Hesperiidae, the distal portion of the antenna is similar to that of the Hesperiidae with a club and apiculus and the presence of three cubital veins on the wings. Few species are dimorphic in coloration although both sexes are similar in appearance (Miller 2000). At present almost 90 species belonging to 33 genera are recognized, even though some authors mention up to 106 different species (Lamas 1995, Miller 2000, González et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevo León – Coahuila – Texas
    Regional Workgroup for Tamaulipas - Nuevo León – Coahuila – Texas of the U.S.-Mexico Border 2020 Environmental Program (as of July 28, 2014) REGIONAL WORKGROUP CO-CHAIRS U.S. Federal Co-Chair Mexican Federal Co-Chair Sam Coleman Ing. Jesús González Macías Regional Deputy Administrator, U.S. EPA Delegate, SEMARNAT Tamaulipas Staff: Gina Weber, EPA/Region 6 Border Staff: Horacio del Angel, 834-318-5254 Coordinator, 214-665-6787 [email protected] [email protected] U.S. State Co-Chair Mexican State Co-Chairs Bryan W. Shaw, Ph.D., P.E. Ing. Fernando Gutierrez Moreno, Secretary of Chairman, Texas Commission on Environmental Sustainable Development, State of Nuevo León Quality Staff: Norma A. Rangel Sevilla, 812-033-1938 Staff: Steve Niemeyer. P.E., Border Affairs and [email protected] Colonias Manager [email protected] Biol. Eglantina Canales, Secretary of the Environment, State of Coahuila Claudia Lozano-Clifford, REM, Border Coordinator Staff: Alejandra Carrera, 844-698-1098 [email protected] 844-410-0014 [email protected] Oscar Flores, 844-698-1091 ext. 7268 [email protected] Ing. Humberto René Salinas Treviño Secretary of Urban Development and Environment, State of Tamaulipas Staff: Heberto Cavazos Lliteras, 834-107-8266 [email protected] Victor Arceo, 834-107-8261 [email protected] Mexican Staff Liaison for Workgroup Gustavo Pantoja Villarreal, 867-718-6336, 867-727-0486 [email protected] TASK FORCES AND COMMITTEES TASK FORCE CO-LEADERS Country Gulf Falcon Amistad U.S. John Wood, Board Member of Raul Salinas, Mayor of Laredo, TX Ramsey Cantu, Mayor of Eagle Pass, Cameron County Regional Mobility Staff: John Porter, 956-794-1650 TX Authority, 956-778-7175 [email protected] [email protected] Staff: Hector Chavez, 830-773-9408 [email protected] Joe Rathmell, County Judge, Zapata County Staff: Audelia Hernandez, 956-765-9920 [email protected] MX Lic.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellow-Headed Vulture in Tamaulipas, Mexico
    May, 1954 FROM FIELD AN’D STUDY 165 455), however, found that 10 per cent of 243 goldfinch nests were built in Cornus stohijeya in south- ern Michigan, and Stokes (Wilson Bull., 62, 1950: 118) found goldfinch nests “commonly placed in red-o&r dogwood” in Wisconsin. The same bush has been used as a nest site by one or all three of the species in successive years. In several instances, in a single summer, either two or three of the species discussed here have built in the same clump or thicket or in nearby bushes. One especially interesting example of nest site association, in panicled dogwood, was observed at Geddes Pond in 1952. On June 10, I found a Yellow Warbler nest with three young estimated to be four or five days old; a Trail1 Flycatcher nest was under construction in the same clump of dogwood 53 inches from the warbler nest. Three young flycatchers hatched on July 3 or 4. An American Gold- finch nest, begun about August 15, was placed 40 inches from the Trail1 Flycatcher nest and 23 inches from the Yellow Warbler nest. In 1953 both Yellow Warblers and Trail1 Flycatchers nested again in this same clump of dogwood. I did not visit the area until July 7, 1953, at which time the one remain- ing flycatcher flew from the nest at my approach; the warbler nest had been empty for some time. At the University Botanical Gardens, two young flycatchers left their nest in a privet hedge on July 30, 1953. On August 20, I first noted a complete, empty goldfinch nest, in the same hedge, 40 inches from the flycatcher nest.
    [Show full text]
  • Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
    Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo APPENDIX A POLICY ADVISORY COMMITTEE & TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP CHARTER AND ANNEX I LAREDO – COAHUILA/NUEVO LEON/TAMAULIPAS BORDER MASTER PLAN Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group Charter PREAMBLE The participating United States and Mexican government agencies, as well as rail stakeholders whose objectives include border transportation infrastructure planning, programming, construction and/or management: Recognize the bilateral nature of border transportation issues and that the latter can be most effectively addressed jointly; Reaffirm that international trade is dependent upon well-coordinated transportation planning processes along the border; Acknowledge that the United States (U.S.) and Mexican border region transportation assets are experiencing congestion issues that must be addressed to avoid adverse trade and environmental impacts; and Convinced of the need to better coordinate planning at the federal, state, regional, and local level to improve transportation infrastructure in the border region of their respective countries, including at formal ports of entry (POEs) and the transportation infrastructure serving formal POEs, Hereby wish to create the Laredo – Coahuila/Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan’s Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group as follows: SECTION 1: PURPOSE Under the direction of the U.S. / Mexico Joint Working Committee, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) hereby announces the establishment of the Laredo – Coahuila/Nuevo Leon/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Policy Advisory Committee and Technical Working Group. The government agencies and rail stakeholders will participate in the development of a Border Master Plan – a comprehensive approach for coordinating planning and delivery of POE and transportation infrastructure projects serving POEs under the jurisdiction of TxDOT’s Laredo District and the correspondent Mexican States.
    [Show full text]
  • Del Rio Acuña Nuevo Laredo Laredo Eagle Pass Piedras Negras
    Del Rio Acuña Eagle Pass Piedras Negras Laredo Nuevo Laredo Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan Executive Summary Introduction Border Master Plans, as defined and supported by the U.S./Mexico Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning and Programming, the Federal Highway Administration, and the U.S. Department of State, are comprehensive long range plans to inventory transportation and port of entry (POE) infrastructure that facilitate trade, and prioritize planned transportation and POE projects within a defined study area. The Border Master Plans represent binational stakeholder efforts to (i) prioritize and promote POE and related transportation projects; (ii) inform decision-making; (iii) allocate limited funding sources, and (iv) ensure continued dialogue and coordination on future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects. The Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan (Border Master Plan) is the second Border Master Plan that on the U.S.-Mexico border and followed a similar approach as the California-Baja California Border Master Plan. The objectives of the Laredo-Coahuila/Nuevo León/Tamaulipas Border Master Plan were to: design a stakeholder agency involvement process that is inclusive and ensure the participation of all involved in POE projects and the transportation infrastructure serving those POEs; increase the understanding of the POE and transportation planning processes on both sides of the border; develop and implement a plan for prioritizing and promoting POE and related transportation projects, including evaluation criteria and rankings over the short, medium and long term; and establish a process to ensure continued dialogue among federal, state, regional, and local stakeholder agencies in Texas and Mexico to ensure continued coordination on current and future POE and supporting transportation infrastructure needs and projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevo Laredo District
    TAMAULIPAS REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES ON DEATH CASES The State of Tamaulipas, Mexico does not have an official morgue. Instead, the government has an agreement with local funeral homes that function as morgues for all death cases. State regulations do not specify a term for interment, and funeral homes may keep the remains for varying amounts of time, depending on if the body is embalmed. The two funeral homes that work with the state government as morgues in Nuevo Laredo are: Funeraria Valdez 2161 Campeche Phone: 011-52-867-719-0402 (dialing from the U.S.) Funeraria La Paz 3352 Francisco I. Madero Phone: 011-52-867-712-0212 (dialing from the U.S.) CREMATION Cremation costs are approximately $1,000.00 USD, which includes processing the proper documentation (death registration, death certificate, and the permit from Secretary of Health). The remains are preserved in a simple plastic container. If the family wants a different type of container, they may purchase one separately. The funeral home can ship the ashes through the services of a courier company, for which the family would incur an additional cost. SHIPMENT OF REMAINS TO THE U.S. The best option for shipments of remains to the United States is to contact a funeral home located in Laredo, Texas, who can then work with the funeral home in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico throughout the entire process. Once the remains are in Texas, they can be transferred to any city in the United States. Mexican funeral homes charge approximately $1,200.00 USD, which includes a simple casket, embalming, documentation, and shipment to Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico's Ten Most Iconic Endangered Species
    Alejandro Olivera Center for Biological Diversity, April 2018 Executive summary exico is one of the world’s most biologically rich nations, with diverse landscapes that are home to a treasure trove of wildlife, including plant and animal species found nowhere else. Sadly, in Mexico and Maround the world, species are becoming extinct because of human activities at rates never seen before. In this report we highlight the threats facing Mexico’s 10 most iconic endangered species to help illustrate the broader risks confronting the country’s imperiled plants and animals. These 10 species — which in most cases are protected only on paper — were chosen to reflect Mexico’s diversity of wildlife and ecosystems and the wide range of threats to the country’s biodiversity. New awareness of these unique animals and plants is critical to inspiring a nationwide demand to protect these critical components of Mexico’s natural heritage. Although the Mexican government began officially listing and protecting species as extinct, threatened, endangered, and “under special protection” in 1994 — more than 20 years ago — few species have actually recovered, and many critical threats continue unabated. In many cases, officials are failing to enforce crucial laws and regulations that would protect these species. Additionally, the Mexican government has not updated its official list of imperiled species, referred to as NOM059, since 2010, despite new and growing risks from climate change, habitat destruction, the wildlife trade and in some cases direct killing. This failure obscures the true plight of the nation’s endangered wildlife. The following 10 iconic endangered species are not adequately protected by the Mexican government: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border Crossings
    TEXAS-MEXICO INTERNATIONAL BRIDGES AND BORDER CROSSINGS Existing and Proposed 2015 Texas-Mexico International Bridges and Border Crossings Existing and Proposed 2015 Table of Contents Overview ...............................................................................................................................................................................i Map ..................................................................................................................................................................................... II Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... III Veterans International Bridge at Los Tomates ................................................................................................................ 1 Gateway International Bridge ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Free Trade Bridge ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Weslaco-Progreso International Bridge ......................................................................................................................... 10 Donna International Bridge ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]