Λόγος Christology in the Prologue of John's Gospel: a Rejection of Philo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Λόγος Christology in the Prologue of John's Gospel: a Rejection of Philo Λόγος Christology in the Prologue of John’s Gospel: A Rejection of Philo of Alexandria’s Logos Philosophy? By Robert V. Peltier A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Theology South African Theological Seminary March, 2019 Supervisor: Prof. Daniel Lioy Copyright © 2019 Robert Vincent Peltier All rights reserved. The South African Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation, or instruction. ii DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis is my own original work and has not previously in its entirety or in part been submitted to any institution for a degree. iii ABSTRACT Λόγος Christology In the Prologue of John’s Gospel: A Rejection of Philo of Alexandria’s Logos Philosophy? Robert Vincent Peltier The South African Theological Seminary, 2019 Promoter: Prof. Daniel Lioy A leading theory about the inspiration or origin of John’s use of Λόγος as a metaphor for Jesus Christ in the Prologue to the Fourth Gospel is Judeo-Hellenistic philosophical thought, principally the works of Philo of Alexandria and his use of a mystical logos as a pseudo-divine intermediary between transcendent God and humanity. Other scholars have postulated that John’s Christological Λόγος is merely an evolutionary step from Philo’s mystical logos or perhaps was derived from incipient-Gnostic thought. These views are troubling for an evangelical Christian with a conservative view of the inspiration of Scripture and a suitable response is required. The work begins with a discussion of the use of a prologue in Greek literature and an evaluation of the evidence for John selecting this particular literary motif to introduce his gospel. The prologue literary motif was developed by prominent Greek writers as a means to establish the “back story” or to provide an overview, summary, or reveal the theme of a written work. John used the Prologue in the Fourth Gospel as a literary device to draw Greek-speaking diaspora Jews, converts to Judaism (proselytes), and Gentile ‘God-fearers” steeped in Hellenistic culture closer in order to hear the gospel message. Further, John’s Λόγος Christology is evaluated in light of the Greek philosophical beliefs of the first century and an evaluation of the Prologue in a cosmological, metaphysical, epistemological, and soteriological sense is presented. This portion of the work concludes with a review of the many Christological themes found in the Prologue to demonstrate John’s use of a prologue was consistent with the literary standards of iv his time. Also, the strong evidence for John’s authorship, the date of writing (late first century, likely between 85–95 C.E.), and the provenance of the gospel (Ephesus) are established, which establishes that Philo’s were surely available to John. The most straightforward means to prove that John’s Christological Λόγος was not merely the next step or “bridge” in the logical development of Philo’s mythological logos but was rather was a rejection of the Philonic logos was to perform a detailed comparison of the two writings. Philo’s writings pertaining to his description of the nature, purpose, and work of his philosophical logos are closely examined. In general, Philo’s logos is a philosophical construct built upon historical Greek logos that was believed to be the rational intelligence that unifies all creation and the sole face of God to humanity. Philo’s ambition was to develop a unified system of thought regarding the Hebraic Old Testament concept of God with the Hellenistic metaphysical logos. Success in syncretizing the two belief systems would demonstrate that the logos found in the Jewish Old Testament preceded the Greek logos and thus the origin of the Greek logos. A detailed exegetical analysis of the Prologue produced ten essential statements about the origins, person, and work of John’s Christological Λόγος that is next compared to Philo’s description of his mythological logos using a set of ten criterion. The work concludes that there are no intersections of thought between John’s description of the Christological Λόγος and Philo’s logos philosophy. Therefore, John’s Prologue is an explicit “rejection” of Philo’s logos philosophy, whether or not the apostle John was aware of the writings of Philo of Alexandria. John’s Prologue is also an implicit apologetic, or better, a polemic against Philo’s logos philosophy in so far as John’s knowledge of Philo’s writings can only be determined through circumstantial evidence, although motives are impossible to determine without direct knowledge of John’s state of mind at the time of writing the Prologue. These conclusions have many implications. For example, the scholarly view that Philo’s mystical philosophy was an evolutionary step into what was to become John’s Christological view of the Λόγος or that John’s Λόγος is Philo’s logos in abbreviated form may be suspect because neither conclusion is supported by the evidence presented. If there are no similarities of thought then there can be no evolution of thought. John’s Prologue to the Fourth Gospel was written for multiple purposes. John wrote a v persuasive evangelical writing with the purpose of attracting Greek-speaking Jews and Gentiles with the purpose of persuading readers to accept John’s apologetic description of the incarnate Λόγος as God in flesh. In doing so, John explicitly rejects the Philonic logos as the detailed comparison of John’s Christological Λόγος and Philo’s philosophical logos demonstrate. John chose the word “logos” because it is a term recognizable to Gentiles and Jews, living within a Hellenistic culture, as a literary device to attract the largest possible audience as a means to present his polemic against the Philonic logos. It was John’s stated desire that all his readers “...may believe Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and by believing you may have life in His name” (John 20:31). vi DEDICATION To Kathy, my wife and best friend. Your love and encouragement are my inspiration. I also dedicate this work to my many friends and HiWay Baptist Church family who have encouraged me throughout the process of writing this thesis, particularly those who attend my Bible study classes and listen patiently after asking me about my thesis topic. I am truly blessed. vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank the Citizen Potawatomi Nation for its financial assistance in the form of multiple tuition scholarships in support of my work on this degree program. I also wish to thank HiWay Baptist Church Lead Pastor George Barnes III for his support and encouragement of my pursuit of advanced theological education over the past two years. Finally, my thanks to Prof. Dan Lioy, Senior Research Manager, South African Theological Seminary for his kind and gracious support of my project. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ ix LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................... XIII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 PRIMARY RESEARCH QUESTION ......................................................................... 7 1.3 SUBSIDIARY RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................................................. 7 1.4 RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................ 7 1.5 PRESUPPOSITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS ............................................................. 9 1.6 DELIMITATIONS OF THE WORK ......................................................................... 11 1.7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ....................................................................... 12 2.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 12 2.2 THE PROLOGUE AS A NARRATIVE DEVICE ..................................................... 15 2.3 JOHN’S LOGOS CHRISTOLOGY ............................................................................ 17 2.4 CHRISTOLOGICAL THEMES FOUND IN THE PROLOGUE .............................. 29 2.5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 31 CHAPTER 3 THE CONTEXT OF JOHN’S PROLOGUE ........................................ 35 3.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 35 3.2 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ......................................................................................... 42 3.3 SOCIAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................. 47 3.4 CULTURAL CONTEXT............................................................................................ 50 3.5 LITERARY CONTEXT ............................................................................................. 51 3.6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................... 53 ix CHAPTER 4 PHILO OF ALEXANDRIA’S LOGOS PHILOSOPHY ..................... 56 4.1 INTRODUCTION
Recommended publications
  • Lamb of God" Title in John's Gospel: Background, Exegesis, and Major Themes Christiane Shaker [email protected]
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) Fall 12-2016 The "Lamb of God" Title in John's Gospel: Background, Exegesis, and Major Themes Christiane Shaker [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Shaker, Christiane, "The "Lamb of God" Title in John's Gospel: Background, Exegesis, and Major Themes" (2016). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 2220. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/2220 Seton Hall University THE “LAMB OF GOD” TITLE IN JOHN’S GOSPEL: BACKGROUND, EXEGESIS, AND MAJOR THEMES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THEOLOGY CONCENTRATION IN BIBLICAL THEOLOGY BY CHRISTIANE SHAKER South Orange, New Jersey October 2016 ©2016 Christiane Shaker Abstract This study focuses on the testimony of John the Baptist—“Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” [ἴδε ὁ ἀµνὸς τοῦ θεοῦ ὁ αἴρων τὴν ἁµαρτίαν τοῦ κόσµου] (John 1:29, 36)—and its impact on the narrative of the Fourth Gospel. The goal is to provide a deeper understanding of this rich image and its influence on the Gospel. In an attempt to do so, three areas of concentration are explored. First, the most common and accepted views of the background of the “Lamb of God” title in first century Judaism and Christianity are reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • John 1-21 – Review (Part 1)
    John 1-21 – Review (Part 1) In our half-way review, which included the first 12 chapters, our lists were not complete. John likes the numbers 3, 7 and 12. The Gospel of John talks about the seven witnesses to Jesus. Five are mentioned in chapter five and the other two are mentioned in chapter fifteen. The Seven Witnesses. 1. Jesus Himself. 5:31, 8:14 2. John the Baptist. 5:33-35 3. The signs which Jesus accomplished. 5:36 4. God the Father. 5:37-38 5. Scripture. 5:39-40 6. The Holy Spirit. 15:26 7. The 11 disciples. 15:27 John only selected seven signs out of the many signs which Jesus performed. Some of the signs backed up his “I am” statements. Jesus’ signs manifested his glory (2:11). The purpose of the signs is that people might believe in Jesus. (2:11, 20:30-31) The Seven Signs. 1. Changing water to wine at the wedding in Cana. 2:1-11 2. Healing the son of an official via long distance (Cana to Capernaum). 4:46-54 3. Healing the man who was lame for 38 years. 5:1-16 4. Feeding over five thousand people from five loaves of bread and two fish. 6:1-14 (I am the Bread of Life) 5. Giving sight to a man who was born blind. 9:1-38 (I am the Light of the world) 6. Raising Lazarus from the dead who had been in the tomb for four days. 11:1-44 (I am the Resurrection and the Life) 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology Translation of L
    Ludwig Neidhart: Biblical Trinity Doctrine and Christology translation of L. Neidhart, Biblische Trinitätslehre und Christologie, published on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/Trinitaet.html, 2017, translated by the author, published online on http://catholic-church.org/ao/ps/downloads/TrinityChristology.pdf, 2017, © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Hannover 1990 (original German Version), © Dr. Ludwig Neidhart, Augsburg 2017 (extended German Version and English translation, both issued on September 15, 2017) Contents: 1. Unity in Essence and Personal Distinction between Father and Son.......................................................3 2. The Unity in Essence between the Father and the Son: Ten Biblical Arguments...................................8 3. The Holy Spirit or Holy Ghost...................................................................................................................18 4. The Triune God...........................................................................................................................................21 5. Trinity and Incarnation..............................................................................................................................29 6. Development of the Doctrine of Trinity and Incarnation.......................................................................31 7. Summary and Graphic Presentation of the Concepts of Trinity and Incarnation...............................48 8. Discussion: Is the Son subordinated to the Father?................................................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • Logos Catalog
    ID Name Picture bhstcmot Bible History Commentary: Old Testament $45.50 Excellent tool for teachers - elementary, Sunday school, vacation Bible school, Bible class--and students. Franzmann clarifies historical accounts, explains difficult passages, offers essential background information, warns about misapplications of the biblical narrative, and reminds readers of the gospel. Contains maps, illustrated charts and tables, a Hebrew calendar, indexes of proper names and Scripture references, and an explanation of biblical chronology. The mission of Northwestern Publishing House is to deliver biblically sound Christ- centered resources within the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod and beyond. The vision of Northwestern Publishing House is to be the premier resource for quality Lutheran materials faithful to the Scriptures and Lutheran confessions. NPH publishes materials for worship, vacation Bible school, Sunday school, and several other ministries. The NPH headquarters are located in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. BHSWTS42 Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS Hebrew): With Westminster $99.95 4.2 Morphology This edition of the complete Hebrew Bible is a reproduction of the Michigan-Claremont-Westminster text (MCWT) with Westminster Morphology (WM, version 4.2, 2004). The MCWT is based closely on the 1983 edition of Biblica Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS). As of version 2.0, however, MCWT introduced differences between the editions, based on new readings of Codex Leningradensis b19A (L). The MCWT was collated both computationally and manually against various other texts, including Kittel's Biblia Hebraica (BHK), the Michigan-Claremont electronic text. Additionally, manual collations were made using Aron Dotan's The Holy Scriptures and BHK. The Westiminster morphological database adds a complete morphological analysis for each word/morpheme of the Hebrew text.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicodemus and the New Birth
    SESSION EIGHT Nicodemus and the New Birth SESSION SUMMARY This session depicts a conversation in which Jesus taught a religious leader, Nicodemus, about the mystery of regeneration—what He described as “being born again.” Christians have been born again by the Spirit of God, through faith in God’s Son. The new birth is the basis of our confidence that God is at work transforming us and all who believe in the gospel. SCRIPTURE John 3:1-21 86 Leader Guide / Session 8 THE POINT Regeneration is God’s supernatural transformation of believers. INTRO/STARTER 5-10 MINUTES Option 1 Toy commercials are usually filled with action. They show kids having fun as they play with whatever product is being promoted. They highlight the gadget’s best features in a way that appeals to a child’s sense of imagination. But at the end, a narrator usually comes on and makes a disclaimer: “Batteries not included.” Most likely, there were numerous occasions when well-meaning parents or guardians purchased a toy their child wanted without realizing there were no batteries in the box—unbearable disappointment in the eyes of a child! The kid feels duped, the parent is embarrassed, and the moment of bliss fades away because the toy can’t function. • When have you been disappointed by something not functioning as you thought it would? What was the reason for the item’s inability to function? As Christians, we believe salvation is a gift. God our Father has shown us grace in giving us salvation. But unlike those disappointing toy commercials, this gift doesn’t need a disclaimer that says “batteries are not included.” The good news about God’s gift is that, alongside forgiveness of sins, we receive the Holy Spirit.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving from Darkness Into Light
    Visit us on the web! www.CogentNotion.org Thoughtful Christian Commentary & Review Summer 2012 Edition A Print Publication of ThinkingChristians.com Moving from Darkness into Light in addition to John 2, we need to take a quick look Jesus and Nicodemus (John 3:1-21) at John 21:25, where we learn that Jesus did many by Bill Moller (a sermon transcript) other things that were not documented in the Bible. So, I think we can assume that in addition to We’ve all seen them, those John 3:16 posters. In these two events noted in chapter two, there were the stands and among the crowds at sporting probably other miraculous signs and maybe other events and political rallies. Most of us know this tumultuous events as well. verse by heart: Imagine, if you will, a group of religio-political For God so loved the world that he gave his one leaders gathering each day at the Temple in and only son, that whoever believes in him shall Jerusalem. They have heard reports of a Rabbi not perish but have eternal life. from Nazareth who was performing miraculous signs – The verse comes toward the end water into wine - and selecting of the passage that tells us about “disciples” who were leaving a meeting between Jesus and their homes and businesses to Nicodemus. The opening verse follow him. Then suddenly this notes that Nicodemus was a Rabbi (Jesus) shows up in the Pharisee, a member of the Jewish Temple courtyard, pulls out a ruling council, who came to Jesus whip, and begins disrupting at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I: Explaining the Biblical Term 'Son(S) of God' in Muslim Contexts
    Delicate Issues in Mission Part I: Explaining the Biblical Term ‘Son(s) of God’ in Muslim Contexts by Rick Brown The Problem for Muslims n some languages and people groups, sonship terminology is used almost exclusively for direct biological relationships, i.e., it means the same as I ‘offspring’ in English. In Classical Arabic, for example, the counterparts for ‘son’ and ‘father’ mean biological son and biological father. These terms were not used metaphorically for other interpersonal relationships, not even for a nephew, a step-son, or an adopted son.1 One did not normally call someone else ibnî “my son” as a term of endearment, because it could suggest a claim of paternity, with all that this entailed. The Arabic usage contrasts signifi cantly with the situation in Hebrew and Aramaic (and Akkadian), where one could address his son, grandson, nephew, son-in-law, and neighbor’s son as bnî / brî ‘my son’ and the female counter- parts as bittî / bratî ‘my daughter’. (The plural of ‘son’ was gender inclusive.) The disciples of a prophet, rabbi, or craftsman could be called his “sons.” The citizens of a kingdom could be called the king’s “sons,” and a paramount king could refer to his vice-regent or viceregal king as his “son.” Speaking through the prophets in language the people could understand, God called his people his “son” and his faithful servants his “sons.” He was their king and the king of kings, so when he set David over them has his viceregal king, he called David his “son,” and similarly with King Solomon and a King he said would arise from their lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvinism Vs Wesleyan Arminianism
    The Comparison of Calvinism and Wesleyan Arminianism by Carl L. Possehl Membership Class Resource B.S., Upper Iowa University, 1968 M.C.M., Olivet Nazarene University, 1991 Pastor, Plantation Wesleyan Church 10/95 Edition When we start to investigate the difference between Calvinism and Wesleyan Arminianism, the question must be asked: "For Whom Did Christ Die?" Many Christians answer the question with these Scriptures: (Failing, 1978, pp.1-3) JOH 3:16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. (NIV) We believe that "whoever" means "any person, and ...that any person can believe, by the assisting Spirit of God." (Failing, 1978, pp.1-3) 1Timothy 2:3-4 This is good, and pleases God our Savior, (4) who wants all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth. (NIV) 2PE 3:9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance. (NIV) REV 22:17 The Spirit and the bride say, "Come!" And let him who hears say, "Come!" Whoever is thirsty, let him come; and whoever wishes, let him take the free gift of the water of life. (NIV) (Matthew 28:19-20 NIV) Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, (20) and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
    [Show full text]
  • ABHE Essentials Full List of Titles
    ABHE Essentials Full List of Titles • Logos Full Feature Set • Intermediate New Testament Greek • Atlas of Christian History • Key to the Elements of New Testament Greek • Holman Bible Atlas • The Elements of New Testament Greek • English Standard Version Audio • Theological Lexicon of the New Testament • Lexham English Bible Audio • The Greek New Testament: SBL Edition • Dictionary of Bible Themes • A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar • Eerdmans Bible Dictionary • Enhanced Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon • Holman Illustrated Bible Dictionary • Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar, 2nd English Edition • Lexham Bible Dictionary • Grammar of Biblical Hebrew • The New Bible Dictionary, Third Edition • Lexham Theological Wordbook • The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge • Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament • An Introduction to the New Testament • Lexham Hebrew Bible • Bible Knowledge Commentary • Basic Bible Interpretation: A Practical Guide to Discovering • Evangelical Commentary on the Bible Biblical Truth • IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament, 2nd ed • Glossary of Morpho-Syntactic Database Terminology • IVP Bible Background Commentary: Old Testament • The Lexham English Septuagint • New American Commentary (42 vols.) • The Lexham English Septuagint: Alternate Texts • New Bible Commentary • The Old Testament in Greek according to the Septuagint • Tyndale Commentaries (58 vols) • The Old Testament in Greek according to the Septuagint • New Testament Theology: Many Witnesses, One Gospel (Alternate Texts) • Old Testament Theology,
    [Show full text]
  • 1 a Man Called Peter John 21:15-19 / 6-2-19 / Pm I. First
    1 A MAN CALLED PETER JOHN 21:15-19 / 6-2-19 / PM I. FIRST, LET’S CONSIDER PETER’S LIFE. A. Name: The “Rock” given to him by Jesus when he was first called as a disciple (John 1:42). B. Family: 1. His father was Jonah sometimes referred to as John (John 21:15). 2. His brother was Andrew, who introduced Peter to Jesus—John 1:40-41. C. Occupation: Professional fisherman—Matt. 4:19. D. Education: Little formal education (Acts 4:13). E. He was originally from Bethsaida, but later moved to Capernaum. F. Family: He was married—Matt. 8:14 and I Corinthians 9:5. G. Place in the Twelve: Leader, Spokesman and part of Jesus’ inner circle of Peter, James and John. H. Important events: 1. Calling as a disciple (Matt 4). 2. Walking on water (Matt 14). 3. Witnessed the Transfiguration (Matt. 17). 4. Instrumental in establishing the Church (Matt 16). 5. Denied Jesus (John 18). 6. Affirmed Jesus three times—John 21:15-17. 7. Preached at Pentecost and 3,000 saved (Acts 2). 8. Stood up to Jewish religious leaders--Acts 4:18-20. 9. First to share the gospel with gentiles (Acts 10-11)—Acts 11:18. 10. Healed two lame men (Acts 3 & Acts 9). 11. Raised Dorcas from the dead (Acts 9). 2 II. NOW LET’S LOOK AT PETER’S LESSONS. A. First, let’s consider his weaknesses. 1. Spoke before he thought. 2. Inconsistent at first in his faith. 3. Fearful of others. 4. Defensive—Matt 26:35.
    [Show full text]
  • NT 617 Exegesis of Johannine Literature Jan Van Der Watt
    Asbury Theological Seminary ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange Syllabi eCommons 1-1-2004 NT 617 Exegesis of Johannine Literature Jan Van Der Watt Follow this and additional works at: http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi Recommended Citation Van Der Watt, Jan, "NT 617 Exegesis of Johannine Literature" (2004). Syllabi. Book 1327. http://place.asburyseminary.edu/syllabi/1327 This Document is brought to you for free and open access by the eCommons at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Syllabi by an authorized administrator of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY EXEGESIS OF THE JOHANNINE LITERATURE (NT 617) Jan Van Der Watt, Fall 2004 1. Course details 1.1 Person responsible: Jan van der Watt will offer this course. (Since I am a visiting scholar, you might want to get to know me and my institution better. Please go to www.up.ac.za , then to ‘Academic departments’ and then to ‘Department of New Testament Studies’). 1.2 Contact details: [email protected] 1.3 Duration: Fall 2004 1.4 Contact sessions and hours of credit: three (3) hours per week for the duration of the second semester 2004. Total hours of credit: 37.5 1.5 Prerequisites: NT[IBS] 510 or 511; NT 520; and NT 500 or 501/502 or equivalent. May be taken by students in MA programs not requiring Greek by special arrangement with the professor 2. Description A study of selected passages in Johannine literature this course will deal with the various textual, historical, exegetical, theological, and ethical concerns raised in Johannine literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus and Salvation: an Essay in Interpretation
    Theological Studies 55 (1994) JESUS AND SALVATION: AN ESSAY IN INTERPRETATION ROGER HAIGHT, S.J. Weston School of Theology HE CONCEPT of salvation is central to Christianity. From a historical T perspective, the experience of Jesus as savior is the basis from which the Christian movement sprang. This religion arose and contin­ ues to exist because people experience Jesus as a bringer of God's salvation. Christology in its narrow sense of defining the status of Jesus before God and human beings depends upon soteriology. Yet despite this centrality and importance, the Church has never formu­ lated a conciliar definition of salvation nor provided a universally ac­ cepted conception. This is not necessarily something negative, but it still leaves us with a pluralism in the domain of the theology of sal­ vation, the meaning of which remains open and fluid. Salvation is also elusive: like time, every Christian knows its meaning until asked to explain it. Because of its centrality, the problems that surround the concept of salvation are rendered more grave. Many of the traditional expres­ sions of how Jesus saves are expressed in myths that no longer com­ municate to educated Christians; some are even offensive. Some of the traditional theological "explanations" of salvation through Christ do no better. Often treatments of salvation are largely devoted to rehears­ ing traditional theories or presenting models or types which seem to inject some order into the disarray.1 But one cannot assume that these 1 Perhaps the most famous study of the typologies is Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor: An Historical Study of the Three Types of the Idea of Atonement, trans.
    [Show full text]