Proposed Classification for Human Modified Soils in Canada: Anthroposolic Order
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Field Handbook for the Soils of Western Canada Section 4: Horizon Identification
1 Field Handbook for the Soils of Western Canada Section 4: Horizon Identification November 2015 Dan Pennock University of Saskatchewan Kent Watson Thompson Rivers University Paul Sanborn University of Northern British Columbia 2 This field guide is one section of a Field Guide for the Soils of Western Canada, which is currently under development by the three authors. Our intent for the field guide is two-‐fold: 1) to simplify the use of the Canadian System of Soil Classification in the field and 2) to allow field testing of a new soil order for Anthroposolic soils, which has been proposed for inclusion in the Canadian System of Soil Classification. Other than the he inclusion of t provisional Anthroposolic order there is no other (intentional) revision to the 3rd Edition of the Canadian System of Soil Classification. This section draws very heavily on material from the following: Soil Classification Working Group. 1998. The Canadian System of Soil Classification. rd 3 Ed. Research Branch, Agriculture -‐ and Agri Food Canada. Publication 1646. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario. This is available on-‐line at http://sis.a gr.gc.ca/cansis/taxa/cssc3/index.html. Our section is designed to be used in conjunction with a field guide for describing soil morphology such Section as 3 of this Field Soils Handbook, Illustrated by Kent Watson, The Field Guide for Describing Soils in Ontario, or the CanSIS Manual for Describing Soils in the Field (available on-‐line at http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/publications/manuals/1982 -‐forms/index.html ). The material on Anthroposolic soils is drawn from: Naeth, A ., Archibald, H.A., Nemirsky, C.L., Leskiw, L.A., Brierley, A. -
An Investigation of the Pattern Formed by Soil Transfer When Clothing Fabrics Are Placed on Soil Using Visual Examination and Image Processing Analysis Kathleen R
Forensic Science and Criminology Research Article An investigation of the pattern formed by soil transfer when clothing fabrics are placed on soil using visual examination and image processing analysis Kathleen R. Murray1,2*, Robert W. Fitzpatrick1,2, Ralph Bottrill2,3 and Hilton Kobus2,4 1School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 2Centre for Australian Forensic Soil Science, CSIRO Land and water, Urrbrae, Australia 3Mineral Resources Tasmania, Rosny Park, Australia 4Forensic Science Research Centre, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia Abstract A series of soil transference experiments led to the development of two methods to identify and interpret trace soil patterns on clothing fabric. Instigated by an unsolved murder, this paper developed previous field experiments to visually interpret trace soil patterns on a simulated clothed victim placed on soil during a crime. Soil transfer patterns were easily identified using direct visual analysis. Image processing software was used to analyse digital photographs and provided objective, standardised and comprehensive numerical data. This object-oriented classification of all trace soil objects transferred (≥ 2 pixels) allowed directionality and abundance of transferred soil to be determined and additionally Munsell soil colour classification could be made. To gain greater understanding of how the physical transference of soil on a victim’s clothing might indicate the circumstances of an attack, 400 soil transfer experiments investigated two methods of placing weighted fabric on a wet or dry soil surface. The methodology has now been applied in other case work. Introduction cotton, nylon and polar fleece (polyester brushed on both sides)), 400 STEs were conducted to advance scientific knowledge of forensic soil Forensic soil evidence has the ability to help police solve crime by science. -
Are Urban Soils Similar to Natural Soils of River Valleys?
J Soils Sediments DOI 10.1007/s11368-014-0973-6 SPECIAL ISSUE: SUITMA 7 Are urban soils similar to natural soils of river valleys? Joël Amossé & Renée-Claire Le Bayon & Jean-Michel Gobat Received: 3 December 2013 /Accepted: 21 August 2014 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014 Abstract thickness was positively correlated to soil age, while the Purpose Urban soils and soils of river valleys are constituted coarse fraction, sand content and C/N were negatively corre- of heterogeneous materials that have been manipulated, dis- lated to soil age gradient. In soils of the river valley, most of turbed or transported at different spatial and temporal scales. the chemical variables were either negatively (pHH2O and Despite these similarities, little is known about soil evolution CaCO3)orpositively(CEC,Corg and Ntot)correlatedtosoil in urban soils and their comparison with natural soils remains distance from the river. These differences between gradients therefore highly useful. We hypothesized that, according to can be mainly explained by parent material, depositional their degree of perturbation, urban soils and natural soils of conditions and land use which can influence soil processes. river valleys have similar soil processes related to their struc- However, alluvial soils were well clustered with two identified ture, physical and chemical characteristics. urban soil groups according to soil maturity. Evolved alluvial Materials and methods Using a synchronic approach, we soils far from the river were grouped with natural and near compared two soil gradients, one located in the natural reserve natural urban soils. Conversely, “young” perturbed alluvial of the Allondon River (canton of Geneva, Switzerland) and soils were most clustered with human-made soils. -
Artificialised Land and Artificialisation Processes
Lead Scientists : Béatrice Béchet – Ifsttar, l'IRSTV CNRS (FR2488) Yves Le Bissonnais, Inra, LISAH Anne Ruas, Ifsttar, COSYS – LISIS Publication Director: Bertrand Schmitt - Inra, Delegation for Collective Scientific Expertise, Foresight and Advanced Studies (DEPE) Contacts: Béatrice Béchet : [email protected] Yves Le Bissonnais : [email protected] Anne Ruas: [email protected] Bertrand Schmitt : [email protected] To cite this document: Béatrice Béchet, Yves Le Bissonnais, Anne Ruas (pilotes), Anne Aguilera, Hervé Andrieu, Eric Barbe, Philippe Billet, Jean Cavailhès, Marianne Cohen, Sophie Cornu, Laetitia Dablanc, Cécile Delolme, Ghislain Géniaux, Mickaël Hedde, Catherine Mering, Marjorie Musy, Mario Polèse, Christiane Weber, Antoine Frémont, Sophie Le Perchec, Bertrand Schmitt, Isabelle Savini, Maylis Desrousseaux, 2017. Artificialized land and land take; drivers, impacts and potential responses. Synthesis of the collective scientific expert report, Ifsttar-Inra (France), 121 p. This document summarizes the collective scientific assessment report jointly requested by the Ministry in charge of the Environment (General Commissariat for Sustainable Development, CGDD, Ministry of Ecological and Inclusive Transition, MTES), ADEME (Environment and Energy Management Agency) and the Ministry of Agriculture and Food (Directorate General of Economic and Environmental Performance of Enterprises, DGPE), Conventions No. 15-MBGD-GESSOL-1cvs001, No. 14- 60-C0067, No. 154-14-13. The contents of the full report and this abridged