Aal-2011-4-078
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
AAL-2011-4-078 Deliverable D-2.1 State-of-the-Art and Requirements Analysis Deliverable Type: PU* Nature of the Deliverable: R** Date: 2012-07-16 Distribution: WP2 Code: MdO_T2.1_T2.2_UoAS_D-2.1_180712 Editor: UoAS Contributors: ALL * Deliverable Type: PU= Public, RE= Restricted to a group specified by the Consortium, PP= Restricted to other program participants (including the Commission services), CO= Confidential, only for members of the Consortium (including the Commission services) ** Nature of the Deliverable: P= Prototype, R= Report, S= Specification, T= Tool, O= Other Abstract: This deliverable presents use cases and application scenarios defining the MOBILE.OLD services, as well as state-of-the-art technology candidates for their implementation. The former are influences by the results of interviews on the pilot sites, which are summarized in this document. All of the above results in a number of technological- and user requirements. Copyright by the MOBILE.OLD Consortium. The MOBILE.OLD Consortium consists of: Participant no. Participant organization name Country 1 (Coordinator) LIFEtool gemeinnützige GmbH Austria 2 National Foundation for the Elderly The Netherlands 3 Madrid Health Cluster Spain 4 Ana Aslan International Foundation Romania 5 SIEMENS PROGRAM AND SYSTEM ENGINEERING SRL Romania 6 SEPROTRONIC GmbH Germany 7 SAFEVIEW Spain 8 BLUE POINT IT SOLUTIONS Romania 9 AdvTEC Ltd. United Kingdom 10 Upper Austria University of Applied Sciences Austria D-2.1: State-of-the-Art and Requirements Analysis Page 2 of 221 DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY Version Date Modifications introduced Modification reason Modified by v.01 2012-07-16 First draft version of the deliverable UoAS v.02 2012-10-22 Integration of Inputs UoAS v.03 2012-10-23 Formatting and ready for review UoAS v.04 2012-10-25 Integration of Inputs from Review UoAS MdO_T2.1_T2.2_UoAS_Deliverable_D-2.1 MOBILE.OLD Consortium – October 2012 D-2.1: State-of-the-Art and Requirements Analysis Page 3 of 221 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 14 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 15 1.1 Scope............................................................................................................................ 15 1.2 Deliverable Structure ................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Methodology ............................................................................................................... 16 1.4 Notes ............................................................................................................................ 18 2 User Requirements Analysis ............................................................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 19 2.2 User Requirements Capture Methodology ................................................................. 19 2.3 User Requirements Capturing Process ........................................................................ 20 2.4 Personas....................................................................................................................... 21 2.4.1 Mr. Johnson .......................................................................................................... 23 2.4.2 Siegfried Trauer .................................................................................................... 24 2.4.3 Helmuth Schlingel................................................................................................. 25 2.4.4 Doris Schwester .................................................................................................... 26 2.4.5 Peter Meister ........................................................................................................ 27 2.4.6 Monica .................................................................................................................. 28 2.4.7 Maria .................................................................................................................... 29 2.4.8 Laura ..................................................................................................................... 30 2.4.9 George .................................................................................................................. 31 2.4.10 Valeriu .................................................................................................................. 32 2.4.11 Mircea ................................................................................................................... 33 2.4.12 LUCRETIA .............................................................................................................. 34 2.4.13 Ovidiu and Mariana .............................................................................................. 35 2.4.14 Javier ..................................................................................................................... 36 2.4.15 Ismael ................................................................................................................... 37 2.4.16 Julia ....................................................................................................................... 38 2.4.17 Tina ....................................................................................................................... 39 2.4.18 Honorio ................................................................................................................. 40 MdO_T2.1_T2.2_UoAS_Deliverable_D-2.1 MOBILE.OLD Consortium – October 2012 D-2.1: State-of-the-Art and Requirements Analysis Page 4 of 221 2.5 Use Cases ..................................................................................................................... 41 2.5.1 Personalized transportation news headlines ....................................................... 42 2.5.2 Trans-national journey planning .......................................................................... 48 2.5.3 Geofencing ........................................................................................................... 51 2.5.4 Physical training ................................................................................................... 57 2.5.5 Orientation and mobility training (incl. Hiking) ................................................... 61 2.5.6 Additional Service ................................................................................................. 69 2.5.7 Main menu ........................................................................................................... 70 2.5.8 Use case list .......................................................................................................... 71 2.6 Application Scenarios .................................................................................................. 72 2.6.1 Personalized transportation news headlines ....................................................... 72 2.6.2 Trans-national journey planning .......................................................................... 75 2.6.3 Geofencing ........................................................................................................... 76 2.6.4 Physical training ................................................................................................... 77 2.6.5 Orientation and mobility training (incl. Hiking) ................................................... 79 2.6.6 Service Comprehensive Scenarios ........................................................................ 81 2.7 Interviews .................................................................................................................... 84 2.8 The interview structure and methodology .................................................................. 84 2.9 The Pilot Sites .............................................................................................................. 84 2.9.1 The Austrian Pilot Site .......................................................................................... 84 2.9.2 The Dutch Pilot Site .............................................................................................. 85 2.9.3 The Spanish Pilot Site ........................................................................................... 85 2.9.4 The Romanian Pilot Site ....................................................................................... 85 2.10 Interview Results ......................................................................................................... 86 2.10.1 Interview Results of the Austrian pilot site .......................................................... 86 2.10.1.1 The end user group ....................................................................................... 86 2.10.1.2 The end user group and technological devices ............................................ 86 2.10.1.3 Activities and mobility................................................................................... 87 2.10.1.4 Rating of the MOBILE.OLD services .............................................................. 87 2.10.1.5 Comments of the elderly on the services ..................................................... 88 2.10.1.6 Results of the user tests on the Samsung