Inside Wide, EDF Is Working to Create a Major Problem: Its Science Was Better Approach on the Gulf Badly Flawed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inside Wide, EDF Is Working to Create a Major Problem: Its Science Was Better Approach on the Gulf Badly Flawed A BIMONTHLY REPORT TO MEMBERS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND VOL. XXIX, NO. 4 Letter SEPTEMBER 1998 Global Warming Could Raise Sea Level Up to 20 Feet missions of greenhouse gases projected next 100 years, could cause one or more of Eover the next century may lead to the the floating ice shelves surrounding West disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Antarctica to thin and eventually break Sheet, according to an article published up. Since ice shelves float, their disintegra- May 28 in the scientific journal Nature. tion does not increase sea level. But if the This would cause a 13- to 20-foot rise in flow of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet into sea level and major coastal flooding. Dr. the ocean increased as a result, global sea Michael Oppenheimer, EDF atmospheric level would rise. The rapid collapse of physicist and author of the peer-reviewed smaller ice shelves along the Antarctic article, concluded that if emissions con- Peninsula in recent years raises the possi- tinue unabated, the gradual loss of land- bility that the West Antarctic shelves based ice into the ocean is most likely to might disintegrate quickly once they have occur over the next five to seven cen- Art Wolfe/Tony Stone been thinned by warming. turies, and could become irreversible Global warming could ultimately cause the huge West Antarc- Continued on page 7. within 100 years. tic Ice Sheet to disintegrate, leading to increased calving of Eventually, if complete collapse of the icebergs and a 13- to 20-foot rise in sea level worldwide. How You Can Help West Antarctic Ice Sheet occurred, all of Join the EDF Action Network and support South Florida and more than 25% of permanently lost, according to an earlier action to reduce global warming; to join, Louisiana would be permanently sub- National Academy of Sciences report. send your name, e-mail address, and merged, as would parts of Washington, DC, The West Antarctic Ice Sheet is com- address where you vote to and other coastal cities. Areas where 10 % posed of ice streams, vast rivers of land- [email protected]. Or call EDF’s Member- or more of the population of Florida, based ice that end at floating ice shelves. ship Office at 1-800-684-3322 and ask for Louisiana, South Carolina, Virginia, New Warming of the deep ocean by only a few “20 Simple Steps to Reduce Global Warm- York, and New Jersey now live would be degrees, which is expected to occur in the ing,” or go to www.edf.org/more/10501. EDF Seeks to Curb Pollution from Factory Farms orporate farms housing thousands of untreated animal waste has harmed Chogs and poultry in assembly-line groundwater and human health. Nutri- conditions have multiplied in recent ents and bacteria from animal waste can years, spreading into many states that cause fish kills and harm shellfish in lack adequate environmental controls. contaminated streams, creeks, and estu- These “factory farms” produce an esti- aries. Dangerous and offensive odors and mated two trillion pounds of animal other air pollutants are also emitted. waste per year, posing one of America’s The Environmental Protection Agency serious pollution threats. has proposed a strategy for controlling A typical factory hog farm containing factory farm pollution, but EDF and oth- several thousand swine produces millions er environmental and family-farm groups of gallons of liquid waste (urine, feces, believe it falls far short of addressing and water) annually. Huge volumes of environmental and public health threats. hog waste are stored in primitive open- Robert Willet Most notably, EPA’s draft strategy would air holding ponds or lagoons and then Once primarily a feature of family farms, hog production has not require many factory farms to imple- aerially sprayed on adjacent land. increasingly become a corporate enterprise involving thou- ment better pollution controls until the Improper collection and disposal of sands of animals and assembly-line methods. Continued on page 8. Cleaning Up Shrimp Phony Science Tries to Environmental Hoopster 3Farms in Texas 4Discredit Kyoto Pact 6In environmental work just as in As concern grows about pollu- basketball, attorney Jim Marston An attack on the scientific consen- has learned to improvise. tion from shrimp farms world- sus on global warming had one Inside wide, EDF is working to create a major problem: Its science was better approach on the Gulf badly flawed. Tips for a Greener Office Coast of Texas. 7By making simple choices, office workers can make a big difference. 100% Recycled (75% Post-Consumer) Paper Totally Chlorine Free Please Share or Recycle Regional News State Court Upholds Long Island Pine Barrens Protection Plan NY State Weighs Alternatives The world’s second largest pine barrens to Expanding I-287 ecosystem recently won further protection when a New York State court upheld the The task force assembled by New York Long Island Pine Barrens Protection Plan, Gov. George Pataki to discuss alternatives which preserves 52,500 acres of pine barrens to widening I-287 held its first meetings on eastern Long Island and fosters compact this summer. The proposed $400 million development in an adjacent 47,500-acre expansion of I-287, one of the New York- growth area. The Long Island pine barrens New Jersey metropolitan area’s most con- is not only a unique ecosystem, it also sits gested highways, has been a major target of atop the main recharge zone for Suffolk EDF’s efforts to slow growing traffic vol- County’s drinking water supply. ume and to remedy air quality problems in The developer WJF Corporation, owner the Northeast. of 272 acres of dwarf pine barrens within EDF and others sued in 1994, to ensure the protected core area, had challenged the that I-287 was not expanded without full constitutionality of the plan’s Transfer of evaluation of all other transportation alter- Development Rights (TDR) program. natives, including better transit service, car- TDR’s allow landowners within the protect- pooling incentives, and tolls that would ed core to transfer their development rights vary by time of day and by a vehicle’s num- to nearby areas deemed suitable for higher ber of occupants. Last January, Governor density development. The Suffolk County Pataki canceled the widening plans and Supreme Court ruled that, “The TDR pro- agreed to assemble the task force. He visions...do assure preservation of the real J. Kirk Condyles appointed five state officials and 12 adviso- economic value of the development rights ry members to the group,including EDF Jim Tripp in the Long Island Pine Barrens, which as they existed when still attached to the sits atop an underground aquifer that is the main General Counsel James T.B. Tripp. underlying property.” source of drinking water for Suffolk County. “This task force has the opportunity to EDF General Counsel James T.B. Tripp, create and implement the first comprehen- who helped engineer the TDR plan and is protects a valuable ecosystem and assures sive demand-reduction program in a con- chair of the Pine Barrens Credit Clearing the continued protection of safe drinking gested suburban corridor in the United House, welcomed the ruling. “The plan water for Long Island,” Tripp said. States,” said Tripp. Acid Rain Program Incentives Are Spurring Utilities to Reduce Sulfur Dioxide Emissions Responding to the incentives of the United States to cut emissions of 1990 Clean Air Act’s acid rain program, nitrogen oxides (NOx), which like- formerly high-emitting power plants in the wise contribute to acid rain. NOx Midwest and South have cut their emis- travels long distances and also sions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) by 30% more leads to the formation of urban than the law requires. The “cap and trade” smog, a major problem in cities in program, which EDF helped write, gives the Midwest and Northeast. power plants a financial incentive to Several years ago, EDF pro- reduce their SO2 emissions below the posed a region-wide cap on NOx mandatory level. It is too early to say for emissions, since the long-distance certain that the SO2 reductions are curbing movement of NOx makes state- acid rain, but in 1995 the U.S. Geological by-state controls insufficient. Survey recorded a noticeable decrease in States in the Northeast have Larry Ulrich/Tony Stone rainfall acidity of the sort associated with adopted this approach and the An Adirondack mountain lake. Acid rain has wiped out entire SO2 emissions. EPA recently put forward a pro- fish populations and other aquatic life in nearly 100 lakes in EDF has urged the Environmental Pro- posal to extend it to the entire New York’s Adirondack mountains, which lack buffering min- tection Agency and states in the Eastern Eastern United States. erals to neutralize rain that can be as acidic as lemon juice. National Headquarters California Office Rocky Mountain Office Texas Office 257 Park Avenue South 5655 College Avenue 1405 Arapahoe Avenue 44 East Avenue Letter New York, NY 10010 Oakland, CA 94618 Boulder, CO 80302 Austin, TX 78701 212-505-2100 510-658-8008 303-440-4901 512-478-5161 Editor: Norma H. Watson Assoc. Editor: Tim Connor ©1998 Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. Capital Office Membership Line: North Carolina EDF Project Office Published bimonthly at NY, NY ISSN 0163-2566 1875 Connecticut Ave., NW 800-684-3322 2500 Blue Ridge Road 6 Faneuil Hall Marketplace Raleigh, NC 27607 Boston, MA 02109 Visit EDF Online at www.edf.org Washington, DC 20009 Fax: 202-234-6049 202-387-3500 Internet: [email protected] 919-881-2601 617-723-2996 2 N Director’s Message Texas Will Control Shrimp Farms ressure from EDF Fairness on the Road Pand a broad citizens’ alliance led to the first- Car use not only causes air pollution ever requirement that and greenhouse gas emissions, but also Texas shrimp farms must leads to loss of open space and wildlife obtain state wastewater habitat through highway construction and discharge permits.
Recommended publications
  • Acid Rain Program
    EPA ACID RAIN PROGRAM 2001 PROGRESS REPORT November 2002 This Progress Report replaces the Compliance Report and the Emissions Scorecard used in pre- vious years to report on the results of the Acid Rain Program. All data and results from the Acid Rain Program are now compiled in a single document that reports information on: S emission levels S compliance with the SO2 and NOx components of the program S SO2 allowance prices S emissions monitoring S air quality and deposition monitoring S environmental and human health effects and benefits This Progress Report will be published annually by EPA to update the public on the status of implementation of the Acid Rain Program and our progress towards achieving our environmental goals. Detailed unit-level emissions data are available on our website at http://www.epa.gov/air- markets/emissions/index. Our new query tool that provides access to a variety of EPA emissions data is available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/gdm. For more information on the Acid Rain Program, including information on SO 2 and NOx emissions, acid deposition monitoring, and the environ- mental effects of acid deposition, you can visit our website at http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets. EPA Acid Rain Program 2001 Progress Report EPA-430-R-02-009 Clean Air Markets Program Office of Air and Radiation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November, 2002 Photo credits (clockwise, from upper left): USDA; SoftKey International; VTweb.com; Rick Webb; SoftKey International; SoftKey Internation- al; Photodisc.com (center) Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................... 1 An Innovative Cap and Trade Program for SO2 .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 101/Wednesday, May 26, 1999/Rules and Regulations
    28564 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 1999 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION reference of certain publications listed D. Executive Order 12875 AGENCY in the regulations is approved by the E. Executive Order 13084 Director of the Federal Register as of F. Paperwork Reduction Act 40 CFR Parts 72 and 75 June 25, 1999. G. Regulatory Flexibility H. Submission to Congress and the General ADDRESSES: Docket. Supporting [FRL±6320±8] Accounting Office information used in developing the RIN 2060±AG46 I. Executive Order 13045 regulations is contained in Docket No. J. National Technology Transfer and A±97±35. This docket is available for Acid Rain Program; Continuous Advancement Act public inspection and photocopying Emission Monitoring Rule Revisions between 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. I. Regulated Entities AGENCY: Monday through Friday, excluding Environmental Protection Entities regulated by this action are government holidays and is located at: Agency (EPA). fossil fuel-fired boilers and turbines that EPA Air Docket (MC 6102) , Room M± ACTION: Final rule. serve generators producing electricity, 1500, Waterside Mall, 401 M Street, SW, generate steam, or cogenerate electricity SUMMARY: Title IV of the Clean Air Act Washington, DC 20460. A reasonable fee and steam. While part 75 primarily (CAA or the Act), as amended by the may be charged for photocopying. regulates the electric utility industry, Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: authorizes the Environmental Protection the recent promulgation of 40 CFR part Monika Chandra, Acid Rain Division 96 and certain revisions to part 75 (see Agency (EPA or Agency) to establish the (6204J), U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Emissions Trading in the US
    policy+ + Emissions trading in the U.S. Experience, Lessons, and Considerations + for Greenhouse Gases A. Denny Ellerman Paul L. Joskow M ASSACHUSETTS I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY David Harrison, Jr. NATIONAL E CONOMIC R ESEARCH + ASSOCIATES,INC. Emissions trading in the U.S. Experience, Lessons, and Considerations for Greenhouse Gases Prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change by A. Denny Ellerman Paul L. Joskow M ASSACHUSETTS I NSTITUTE OF T ECHNOLOGY David Harrison, Jr. NATIONAL E CONOMIC R ESEARCH ASSOCIATES,INC. M AY 2003 Blank Contents Foreword ii Executive Summary iii I. Introduction 1 A. Overview of the Concept of Emissions Trading 1 B. Three Basic Types of Emissions Trading Programs 4 C. Other Features of Emissions Trading Programs 5 D. Objective and Organization of this Report 6 II. Experience with Emissions Trading 8 A. EPA Emissions Trading Programs 8 B. Lead-in-Gasoline Program 9 C. Acid Rain Trading Program 11 D. Los Angeles Air Basin RECLAIM Program 20 E. Mobile Source Averaging, Banking, and Trading Programs 27 F. Northeast NOX Budget Trading 29 III. Lessons from Experience with Emissions Trading 32 + A. Economic Effectiveness 32 B. Environmental Effectiveness 33 C. Ability to Trade 35 D. Banking 37 E. Initial Allocation 38 IV. Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Control Programs 40 A. Suitability of Trading 40 + B. Opt-in Features 41 V. Conclusions 44 Glossary 47 Endnotes 49 References 54 i Emissions trading in the U.S. + Foreword Eileen Claussen, President, Pew Center on Global Climate Change In recent years, emissions trading has become an important element of programs to control air pollution.
    [Show full text]
  • Title V Air Pollution Control Permit to Construct and Operate and Acid Rain Phase Ii Permit
    #AOP-12-005 DEC#EJ95-0448 Operating Permit Expiration Date: June 14, 2023 State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Air Quality & Climate Division Montpelier, Vermont TITLE V AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE AND ACID RAIN PHASE II PERMIT Date Permit Issued: June 14, 2018 Owner/Operator: Burlington Electric Department 585 Pine Street Burlington, VT 05401-4891 Source: Electric Generating Facility Unit ID #1 Joseph C. McNeil Generating Station ORIS Code: 589 111 lntervale Road Burlington, VT 05401 Joseph C. McNeil Electric Generating Station #AOP-12-005 FINDINGS OF FACT (A) FACILITY DESCRIPTION Burlington Electric Company (also referred to herein as "Permittee") owns and operates a fifty (50) megawatt (net) multi-fuel fired power plant located at 111 lntervale Road in the town of Burlington, Vermont (also referred to herein as "Facility"). Other electrical power companies with an ownership interest in the McNeil Station include Green Mountain Power Corporation and Vermont Public Power Supply Authority. Operations performed at the McNeil Station are classified within the Standard Industrial Classification Code - 4911 (Electrical Services). The McNeil Station is designated as an "intermediate" power generation plant, and is subject to central dispatch by the Independent System Operator New England ("ISO New England"), a regional consortium of electrical utilities. Permit #AOP-07-020 approved the renewal of the Facility's combined Permit to Construct and Operate. In addition, the Permittee had proposed to install and operate a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system in order to reduce the facility's emissions of NOx. The reduced NOx emissions are required for the Facility to qualify for Class 1 renewable energy credits (RECs) in New England.
    [Show full text]
  • Nos. 14-46, 14-47, 14-49 Supreme Court of the United States Petitioners, V. Respondents. on Writs of Certiorari to the United St
    Nos. 14-46, 14-47, 14-49 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________________________________ STATE OF MICHIGAN , ET AL ., Petitioners , v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY , ET AL ., Respondents . __________________________________ On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit __________________________________ BRIEF OF PETITIONER UTILITY AIR REGULATORY GROUP, ET AL. __________________________________ F. WILLIAM BROWNELL (Counsel of Record ) HENRY V. NICKEL LEE B. ZEUGIN ELIZABETH L. HORNER HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 2200 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE , NW WASHINGTON , D.C. 20037 (202) 955-1500 [email protected] January 20, 2015 Counsel for Petitioner [Counsel for Respondents in Support of Petitioner Joining in This Brief Are Listed Inside This Cover] COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER JOINING IN THIS BRIEF LESLIE SUE RITTS DENNIS LANE RITTS LAW GROUP , PLLC STINSON LEONARD STREET THE CARRIAGE HOUSE LLP 620 FORT WILLIAMS 1775 PENNSYLVANIA PARKWAY AVENUE , NW, SUITE 800 ALEXANDRIA , VA 22304 WASHINGTON , D.C. 20006 (703) 823-2292 (202) 785-9100 [email protected] dennis.lane@ Counsel for American stinsonleonard.com Public Power Association PARTHENIA B. EVANS STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP BART E. CASSIDY 1201 WALNUT STREET KATHERINE L. VACCARO SUITE 2900 MANKO , GOLD , KATCHER & KANSAS CITY , MO 64106 FOX , LLP (816) 842-8600 401 CITY AVENUE parthy.evans@ SUITE 901 stinsonleonard.com BALA CYNWYD , PA 19004 (484) 430-5700 Counsel for Kansas City [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Markets for Clean Air the U.S
    Markets for Clean Air The U.S. Acid Rain Program A. DENNY ELLERMAN PAUL L. JOSKOW Massachusetts Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology Technology RICHARD SCHMALENSEE JUAN-PABLO Massachusetts Institute of MONTERO Technology Catholic University of Chile ELIZABETH M. BAILEY National Economic Research Associates, Inc. published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA http://www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain © Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2000 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United States of America Typeface Times Roman 10.5/13pt. System QuarkXPress [BTS] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data Markets for clean air : the U.S. acid rain program / A. Denny Ellerman... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-521-66083-1 (alk. paper) 1. Emissions trading – United States. 2. Air quality management – Government policy – United States. 3. Acid rain – Environmental aspects – Government policy – United States. I. Ellerman, A. Denny. HC110.A4M37 2000 363.738¢7 – dc21 99-16913 ISBN 0 521 66083 1 hardback Contents List of Illustrations page xi List of Tables xiii Preface xvii Acknowledgments xxi Part I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Regulatory Uncertainty on the U.S. Acid Rain Program Narendra Paramanand Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2012 The effects of regulatory uncertainty on the U.S. Acid Rain Program Narendra Paramanand Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Paramanand, Narendra, "The effects of regulatory uncertainty on the U.S. Acid Rain Program" (2012). LSU Master's Theses. 3694. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3694 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECTS OF REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY ON THE U.S. ACID RAIN PROGRAM A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in The Department of Environmental Science by Narendra Paramanand B.A., Baruch College, City University of New York, 2008 May 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my gratitude to my committee chair Prof. Michael Wascom for his support both on my thesis and my two years as a graduate student; my committee co-chair Dr. Walter Keithly for his constant support on my econometric models; and finally Dr. Margaret Reams for her help both in the capacity of a committee member and an advisor to overcome obstacles during my time as a graduate student.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Trading on the Costs and Benefits of the Acid Rain Program$
    Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 88 (2018) 180–209 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Environmental Economics and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jeem The impact of trading on the costs and benefits of the Acid Rain Program$ H. Ron Chan a, B. Andrew Chupp b, Maureen L. Cropper c,n, Nicholas Z. Muller d a University of Manchester, UK b Georgia Institute of Technology, USA c Department of Economics, University of Maryland, Resources for the Future, 3114H Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA d Carnegie Mellon University, USA article info abstract Article history: We quantify the cost savings from the Acid Rain Program (ARP) by comparing compliance Received 30 March 2017 costs for 761 coal-fired generating units under the ARP with compliance costs under a Available online 8 December 2017 counterfactual uniform performance standard (UPS) that would have achieved the same JEL nos: aggregate emissions in 2002. In 2002, we find compliance costs to be $200 million (1995$) Q51 lower and health damages to be $170 million (1995$) lower under the ARP. We also Q52 compare health damages associated with observed SO2 emissions from all ARP units in Q58 2002 with damages from a no-trade counterfactual. Damages under the ARP are $2.1 billion (1995$) higher than under the no-trade scenario, reflecting allowance transfers Keywords: from units in the western US to units in the eastern US with larger exposed populations. Sulfur dioxide & 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Acid rain Performance standards Health effects Pollution permits Cap and trade Introduction Motivation The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Acid Rain Program
    November 2012 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Acid Rain Program J uh a Si i k am äki , Dallas Burtraw, Joseph Maher, a nd Clayton Munnings BACKGROUNDER 1616 P St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-328-5000 www.rff.org Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. An Overview of the Sulfur Dioxide Trading Market ..................................................... 2 A. Cap-and-Trade Framework ............................................................................................ 2 B. Implementation of the Acid Rain Program .................................................................... 2 III. Program Effectiveness ..................................................................................................... 3 A. Efficient Allowance Market ........................................................................................... 4 B. Banking of Unused Allowances ..................................................................................... 4 C. Innovation....................................................................................................................... 5 D. The Availability of Low-Sulfur Western Coal .............................................................. 6 E. Historical Allowance Prices ........................................................................................... 6 IV. Monitoring Systems .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Acid Rain Legislation - NLE
    CRS Report: IB91035 - Implementing Acid Rain Legislation - NLE Redistributed as a Service of the National Library for the Environment* Implementing Acid Rain Legislation Larry Parker Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division Congressional Research Service Updated November 15, 1994 IB91035 CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS ● P.L. 101-549, Title IV -- Provisions of Acid Rain Law -- Implementation -- SO2 -- Allowances -- Emission Caps -- Implementation -- NOx -- Excess Emissions -- Clean Coal Technology -- Studies and Reports ● Implementation Schedule ● Implementation Questions -- Regulatory Issues: How Will Allowance Transactions Be Regulated? -- Unfinished Rulemaking -- Operational Issues SUMMARY The broad-ranging provisions in Title IV of The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (P.L. 101-549) raise myriad implementation issues, particularly with respect to the system of tradeable "allowances." This system provides an economic mechanism by which emitters of sulfur dioxide (SO2) can determine the most cost-effective way to meet reduction requirements. Issues include the role of States, particularly public utilities commissions; unfinished rulemaking, including defining repowering technologies and developing revised fossil fuel utility SO2 and NOx New Source Performance Standards (NSPS); and operational issues, including pricing of allowances, auctions, and the Phase 1 allowance pool. The allowance system represents a new turn in environmental policy in directly addressing the issue of pollution control costs. In doing so, it presumes that cost-effectiveness will be the driving factor in SO2 control decisionmaking http://cnie.org/NLE/CRSreports/Air/air-8.cfm (1 of 10) [6/8/2002 10:53:48 AM] CRS Report: IB91035 - Implementing Acid Rain Legislation - NLE by utilities, State regulators, and Federal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Path Forward
    COOPERATIVE MECHANISMS UNDER THE KYOTO PROTOCOL The Path Forward June 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................ 3 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................. 14 II. KEY ATTRIBUTES OF ENVIRONMENTALLY AND ECONOMICALLY EFFECTIVE EMISSIONS TRADING MARKETS ........................................................... 17 III. EMISSIONS TRADING UNDER THE KYOTO PROTOCOL : A PATHWAY TO CREDIBILITY AND SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION ............................... 20 A.The Emissions Trading Framework in the Kyoto Protocol .................20 B. Actual Emissions Performance: The Basis of Accountability ..............21 C. Matching Accountability With Flexibility: Cumulative Multi-Year Commitments ...........................................................22 D. Matching Accountability With Flexibility: The Role of Emissions “Savings” ...............................................................22 E. Matching Accountability With Flexibility: International Emissions Trading ................................................................24 F. Broadening Participation: The Role of the Clean Development Mechanism ..............................................................24 G. The Importance Of Cost Savings ........................................26 IV. THE MECHANICS OF EMISSIONS TRADING UNDER THE PROTOCOL: FOCUS ON ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ............................................... 28 A. The U.S. Acid Rain Program: An Example ..............................29 B. The Mechanics of Annex
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter January 1998
    A BIMONTHLY REPORT TO MEMBERS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND VOL. XXIX, NO. 1 Letter JANUARY 1998 Maryland Adopts EDF Plan to Control Farm Runoff he U.S. Department of Agriculture recreating grass cover on one-tenth of the T(USDA) has approved Maryland’s plan nation’s cropland. There was little effort to carry out an unprecedented joint effort to target the most environmentally sensi- to restore 100,000 acres of wetlands, tive land, however. EDF helped win reau- forests, and eroding farmland along thorization of CRP with a new, strong streams that flow into the Chesapeake environmental focus in the 1996 Farm Bay. Maryland farmers will receive $250 Bill. million to turn marginal farmland into Searchinger suggested that, under the buffers of trees and grasses that will pro- new law, USDA should allow states to vide wildlife habitat and filter pollutants submit plans to use part of the CRP that run off farm fields. funding to clean up particular bodies of Farm runoff containing fertilizer, pes- water or restore rare species. In develop- ticides, and sediment adds more pollu- ing such plans, states can use local scien- tion to the nation’s lakes, streams, and tists to identify the most environmental- bays than any other source. Many scien- Lisa Moore ly valuable farmland and methods of tists believe such pollutants triggered the At the announcement of the Chesapeake Bay protection effort restoration to enroll under CRP. State normally benign Pfiesteria bacteria to were Vice President Al Gore and EDF attorney Tim funds can be used to augment Federal release toxins that killed thousands of Searchinger, who helped design the program.
    [Show full text]