DOCSLIB.ORG

Diplomatic Relations During the Prewar Years: 1927–1936 Full Article Language: En Indien Anders: Engelse Articletitle: 0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diplomatic Relations During the Prewar Years: 1927–1936 Full Article Language: En Indien Anders: Engelse Articletitle: 0 _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien B2 voor dit chapter en dubbelklik nul hierna en zet 2 auteursnamen neer op die plek met and): 0 _full_articletitle_deel (kopregel rechts, vul hierna in): Diplomatic Relations during the Prewar Years: 1927–1936 _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 Diplomatic Relations during the Prewar Years: 1927–1936 33 Chapter 1 Diplomatic Relations During the Prewar Years: 1927–1936 1 International Context The decade leading up to the Second Sino-Japanese War and World War II was marked globally by economic turmoil and the rise of radical political move- ments. The Great Depression that evolved from the US stock market crash of October 1929 caused severe unemployment and poverty in various countries around the globe, especially in the industrialized West. One major ramification was the rise of fascism and militarism, such as in Germany, where under Hit- ler’s leadership the Nazis instituted a massive program of economic recon- struction and rearmament to end unemployment. In the Soviet Union, where its direct effects were limited, the Great Depression nevertheless helped Stalin to solidify his authoritarian grip by instituting a system of political repression and state terror. In Asia, Japanese militarists seized control of their national government and invaded Manchuria, China’s resource-rich northeastern lands, where the puppet state of Manzhouguo (Manchukuo) was established in 1932. The invasion of Manchuria revealed the ineffectiveness of the recently es- tablished League of Nations in pursuing its primary objective of global security and peace. When the league in February 1933 labeled Japan – one of its four original Council members – an aggressor and urged it to remove its troops from Manchuria, Tokyo responded by withdrawing from the league, ignoring its calls. Absorbed in their own affairs, the Western powers refrained from tak- ing any real action to check Japan’s expansionist drift in China, despite grow- ing concerns among the colonial powers, including the Dutch, about the future security of their overseas possessions in Southeast Asia.1 This failure was fol- lowed in October 1933 by Germany’s withdrawal from the World Disarmament Conference, and ultimately from the League of Nations, over disagreement on 1 There has been some debate about when exactly the Dutch began to become concerned about Japanese expansionism in the region and whether it was the Mukden (Manchurian) Incident or worries over Japan’s growing trade with the Dutch East Indies that prompted this. It appears that it was not until 1935–36 that the Dutch authorities began to take concrete actions with these concerns in mind. See Tarling, “‘A Vital British Interest,’” 197; De Jong, Koninkrijk der Nederlanden, vol. 9, 233; Bussemaker, “Paradise in Peril: The Netherlands, Great Britain and the Defence of the Netherlands East Indies,” 117–118; Braat, “Dutch Neutrality in the Pacific,” 123; and section 2.3 of this chapter on G.H.C. Hart’s visit to China. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/9789004410923_003 34 Chapter 1 the issue of disarmament in Europe. The Abyssinian crisis of 1935–36 further underlined the inability of the international community to prevent unilateral use of force. In March 1936, the Nazis began a massive military buildup and remilitarization of the Rhineland in defiance of international agreements. Lat- er that year, Germany and Japan joined hands under the Anti-Comintern Pact, laying the foundation for the future Axis alliance. 1.1 Consolidation of Nationalist Rule in China In China, the decade between 1927 and 1937 has often been viewed as a rela- tively stable interlude between the preceding warlord era and the War of Resis- tance against Japan. Known as the “Nanjing Decade,” this period saw the Nationalist government at Nanjing (Nanking) seeking to lay the basis of a mod- ern, unified nation-state through economic reconstruction, modernization, and international cooperation. Nevertheless, this period was also character- ized by conflict both domestically and internationally. Civil strife between the Nationalists and Communists continued unabated throughout the entire ten- year period from the collapse of the First United Front in mid-1927 until the formation of the Second United Front in September 1937. It was the era of the Long March, the epic trek by Red Army soldiers across China from 1934 to 1936 that marked the ascent to power of Mao Zedong 毛泽东. This was also the time of the Xi’an Incident, which saw Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-shek (Jiang Jieshi 蒋介石) in late 1936 being kidnapped at gunpoint by his own generals and being forced to accept a truce with the Communists. In the background of these events was the ever-growing Japanese threat, resulting in the Mukden Incident of 18 September 1931 and subsequent invasion of Manchuria and the attack on Shanghai in 1932. Amid a massive purge of the Chinese Communists, Chiang Kai-shek estab- lished his new Nationalist government at Nanjing on 18 April 1927. In June the next year, after the Northern Expedition had led to the defeat of the Beiyang 北洋 regime, the Nationalists proclaimed China’s unification and announced the relocation of China’s national capital to Nanjing. Despite concerns in dip- lomatic quarters over the force of the Nationalist movement sweeping across China, the Nanjing government had little difficulty in securing international recognition. In late July, the United States was the first to de jure recognize the Nanjing government by initiating negotiations on a new tariff treaty. The fol- lowing month, the League of Nations accepted a Nanjing-designated head of the Chinese delegation to the Assembly. On 20 December 1928, Sir Miles W. Lampson, the British minister hitherto accredited to the Beiyang government at Beiping (as the Chinese Nationalists called Beijing), was the first foreign dip- lomatic envoy to present his credentials to Chiang Kai-shek, who by then had .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chinese Civil War (1927–37 and 1946–49)
    13 CIVIL WAR CASE STUDY 2: THE CHINESE CIVIL WAR (1927–37 AND 1946–49) As you read this chapter you need to focus on the following essay questions: • Analyze the causes of the Chinese Civil War. • To what extent was the communist victory in China due to the use of guerrilla warfare? • In what ways was the Chinese Civil War a revolutionary war? For the first half of the 20th century, China faced political chaos. Following a revolution in 1911, which overthrew the Manchu dynasty, the new Republic failed to take hold and China continued to be exploited by foreign powers, lacking any strong central government. The Chinese Civil War was an attempt by two ideologically opposed forces – the nationalists and the communists – to see who would ultimately be able to restore order and regain central control over China. The struggle between these two forces, which officially started in 1927, was interrupted by the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese war in 1937, but started again in 1946 once the war with Japan was over. The results of this war were to have a major effect not just on China itself, but also on the international stage. Mao Zedong, the communist Timeline of events – 1911–27 victor of the Chinese Civil War. 1911 Double Tenth Revolution and establishment of the Chinese Republic 1912 Dr Sun Yixian becomes Provisional President of the Republic. Guomindang (GMD) formed and wins majority in parliament. Sun resigns and Yuan Shikai declared provisional president 1915 Japan’s Twenty-One Demands. Yuan attempts to become Emperor 1916 Yuan dies/warlord era begins 1917 Sun attempts to set up republic in Guangzhou.
    [Show full text]
  • View / Download 7.3 Mb
    Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT Between Shanghai and Mecca: Diaspora and Diplomacy of Chinese Muslims in the Twentieth Century by Janice Hyeju Jeong Department of History Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Engseng Ho, Advisor ___________________________ Prasenjit Duara, Advisor ___________________________ Nicole Barnes ___________________________ Adam Mestyan ___________________________ Cemil Aydin An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of History in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Janice Hyeju Jeong 2019 Abstract While China’s recent Belt and the Road Initiative and its expansion across Eurasia is garnering public and scholarly attention, this dissertation recasts the space of Eurasia as one connected through historic Islamic networks between Mecca and China. Specifically, I show that eruptions of
    [Show full text]
  • Part II Chapter 1 How China Became a Communist Country
    Page 64 Part II Chapter 1 How China Became a Communist Country s we have seen the containment doctrine worked well in western Europe. Indeed, after 1945, the Soviet Union did not take over any country where it did not already have troops. Soviet attempts Ato detach Berlin from the West, to infiltrate into Greece, to capture control of Italy and France through communist party victories at the polls, all failed. The Marshall Plan put Europe back on its feet economically; the Truman Doctrine gave Greece and Turkey the help they needed to resist Soviet advances; the airlift saved Berlin; and NATO provided a guarantee of American military aid if needed. Americans had good reasons to be proud of their successes in this vitally important area of the globe. Unfortunately, success among the relatively established industrialized states of Europe could not be duplicated in the shifting, agricultural societies of Asia. Here, and most particularly in China, Americans were confronted with a far more complex situation than in Europe -and it is to this part of the globe that our attention now must turn. Forty Years of Revolution in China There is an old saying known to people who knew Chinese history and culture that no revolution could succeed there without the support of its scholars and its peasants. Unfortunately, most Americans who evaluated policy decisions about China knew little about either its history or its culture. Chinese civilization has a recorded history of some 4,000 years. These can be divided into a series of dynasties or empires, one following another as internal collapse was triggered by strong pressure from the outside.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Civil War and Communist Revolution
    Teacher Overview Objectives: Chinese Civil War and Communist Revolution NYS Social Studies Framework Alignment: Key Idea Conceptual Understanding Content Specification Objectives 10.7 DECOLONIZATION AND 10.7d Nationalism in China influenced Students will trace the Chinese Civil 1. Explain what led to the overthrow NATIONALISM (1900–2000): the removal of the imperial regime, War, including the role of warlords, of the Qing and the start of the Nationalism and decolonization led to numerous conflicts, and nationalists, communists, and the Chinese Civil War. movements employed a variety of resulted in the formation of the world wars that resulted in the methods, including nonviolent communist People’s Republic of division of China into a 2. Explain why the Communists won resistance and armed struggle. China. communist-run People’s Republic of the Chinese Civil War. Tensions and conflicts often China and a nationalist-run Taiwan. continued after independence as new challenges arose. (Standards: 2, 3, 4, 5; Themes: TCC, GEO, SOC, GOV, CIV,) What led to the Chinese Civil War? Objective: Explain what led to the overthrow of the Qing and the start of the Chinese Civil War. Introduction Directions: In the space below, write down what you remember about Chinese history in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Use the terms below to help you recall the events during that time. imperialism Opium War Treaty of Nanjing unequal treaties Boxer Rebellion Spheres of Influence 1 Historical Context: The Fall of the Qing Dynasty and Start of the Chinese Civil War In 1912, the Qing Dynasty, founded in 1644, was overthrown, ending thousands of years of dynastic rule in China.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson Colleg
    The Taiwan Issue and the Normalization of US-China Relations Richard Bush, Brookings Institution Shelley Rigger, Davidson College The Taiwan Issue in US-China Normalization After 1949, there were many obstacles to normalization of relations between the United States and the new People’s Republic of China (PRC), but Taiwan was no doubt a key obstacle. The Kuomintang-led Republic of China (ROC) government and armies had retreated there. Washington maintained diplomatic relations with the ROC government and, in 1954-55, acceded to Chiang Kai-shek’s entreaties for a mutual defense treaty. After June 1950 with the outbreak of the Korean conflict, the United States took the position that the status of the island of Taiwan— whether it was part of the sovereign territory of China—was “yet to be determined.” More broadly, PRC leaders regarded the United States as a threat to their regime, particularly because of its support for the ROC, and American leaders viewed China as a threat to peace and stability in East Asia and to Taiwan, which they saw as an ally in the containment of Asian communism in general and China in particular. It was from Taiwan’s Ching Chuan Kang (CCK) airbase, for example, that U.S. B-52s flew bombing missions over North Vietnam. By the late 1960s, PRC and U.S. leaders recognized the strategic situation in Asia had changed, and that the geopolitical interests of the two countries were not in fundamental conflict. Jimmy Carter and Deng Xiaoping not only reaffirmed that assessment but also recognized a basis for economic cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Chinese Nationalism
    The Birth of Chinese Nationalism By Salvatore Babones May 3, 2019 In China, May 4 is Youth Day, a holiday established by the Communist Party in 1949 and celebrated on and off ever since. On this day in 1989, more than 100,000 students demonstrated in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, a key milestone on road to the tragic events of June 4, when Chinese troops opened fire on the civilians amassed there. This year, China’s president and Communist Party leader, Xi Jinping, has called on students to commemorate a very special Youth Day. But it’s not the 30th anniversary of 1989’s pro- democracy protests that he has in mind. Rather, it is the 100th anniversary of May 4, 1919, that he wants to commemorate. On that day a century ago, another group of students rallied in Tiananmen Square. In May 1919, the leaders of World War I’s victorious allies were meeting in Paris to determine the shape of the postwar world. Most Westerners know that the resulting Treaty of Versailles profoundly influenced subsequent European history through the foundation of the League of Nations, the rise of Adolf Hitler, and eventually World War II. Some may even know how the peace treaty, the Balfour Declaration, and the Sykes-Picot Agreement created the modern Middle East. But Westerners are less aware that the Treaty of Versailles also helped set in motion the series of events that led to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the Chinese Civil War, and today’s tensions between the United States and China over freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Response to the Rural Land Reform During the Chinese Civil War: 1945-1949
    Illinois Wesleyan University Digital Commons @ IWU Honors Projects History Department 2001 The Urban Response to the Rural Land Reform During the Chinese Civil War: 1945-1949 Elizabeth Grad '01 Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Grad '01, Elizabeth, "The Urban Response to the Rural Land Reform During the Chinese Civil War: 1945-1949" (2001). Honors Projects. 15. https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/history_honproj/15 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by faculty at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. • THE URBAN RESPONSE TO THE RURAL LAND REFORM MOVEMENT DURING THE CHINESE CIVIL WAR: 1945-1949 By: Elizabeth Grad • 1 Introduction China's internal condition immediately following the end ofJapanese occupation was complicated and precarious. The conflicting interests ofthe Kuomintang and the Communists were pushing the nation into civil war and pressure from the United States only hastened the collapse ofan already weak: internal structure. The Japanese occupation of China during the war had significant implications and affected the political fortunes of the Kuomintang and the Communists in diverse ways.
    [Show full text]
  • {DOWNLOAD} Sun Yat-Sen Ebook Free Download
    SUN YAT-SEN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marie-Claire Bergere, Janet Lloyd | 492 pages | 01 Jan 2000 | Stanford University Press | 9780804740111 | English | Palo Alto, United States Sun Yat-sen | Marie-Claire Bergère Translated by Janet Lloyd However, as soon as he established his government in Guangzhou, Sun Yat-sen came into conflict with entrenched local power. His militarist government was not based on the Provisional Constitution of , which the anti-Beiyang forces vowed to defend in the Constitutional Protection War. In addition, he was elected president by a parliament that did not meet the rules for a quorum following its move from Beijing. Thus, many politicians and warlords alike challenged the legitimacy of his militarist government. Sun Yat-sen's use of heavy taxes to fund the Northern Expedition to militarily unify China was at odds with the ideas of reformers such as Chen Jiongming, who advocated establishing Guangdong as a "model province" before launching a costly military campaign. In sum, the military government was opposed by the internationally recognized Beiyang government in the north, Chen's Guangdong provincial government in the south, and other provincial powers that shifted alliances according to their own benefit. In , in order to hasten the conquest of China, he began a policy of active cooperation with the Chinese Communists. By this time, he was convinced that the only hope for a unified China lay in a military conquest from his base in the south, followed by a period of political tutelage that would culminate in the transition to democracy. He then prepared for the later Northern Expedition, with help from foreign powers, until his death.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: the Road to Democratic Republicanism
    The 1911 Revolution and the Korean Independence Movement: The Road to Democratic Republicanism KIM Bong-jin 1. Foreword The Xing Zhonghui 興中会 （Revive China Society） started by Sun Yat-sen（ 1866-1925） and Wang Zhaoming 汪兆銘（ Wang Jingwei, 1883-1944） merged with the Hua Xinghui 華興会 established by Song Jiaoren 宋教仁 （1882-1913） and Huang Xing 黄興（ 1874-1916） on August 20, 1905 in Tokyo to become the Zhongguo Tongmenghui 同盟会 （Chinese Revolutionary Alliance）. Sun Yat-sen was selected to head the organization, and Huang Xing to run general affairs. Various documents were adopted, including the “mili- tary government proclamation,” “general articles of the Tongmenghui,” and “revolutionary strategy.” The Tongmenghui issued as their organizational publication the Minbao 民報, which adopted the general principles advocated by Sun of “expel the Manchus and restore China, establish a republic, and equalize land rights.” Subsequently, they fomented uprisings all over China, but all ended in failure. The Wuchang New Army successfully revolted against the Qing govern- ment on October 10, 1911. Other provinces followed suit by declaring inde- pendence from the central government. On January 1, 1912 the Provisional Government of the Republic of China was established in Nanjing, with Sun Yat-sen as provisional president. On February 12, however, Yuan Shikai （1859-1916） compelled the child emperor Puyi（ 1906-1967） to abdicate. The next day Sun Yat-sen turned in his resignation as president and recommended to the provisional National Assembly that Yuan take the position. On February 15 the provisional National Assembly agreed on Yuan’s appointment and to designate Nanjing as the capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared Testimony of Russell Hsiao1 Executive Director Global Taiwan
    Prepared Testimony of Russell Hsiao1 Executive Director Global Taiwan Institute Before The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission "China’s Relations with U.S. Allies and Partners in Europe and the Asia Pacific” Washington, D.C. Thursday, April 5, 2018 Vice-Chairman Bartholomew, Senator Talent, and members of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, thank you for the opportunity to participate in this hearing. A central component in the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) domestic and foreign policy toolkit is the “United Front” (統一戰線). This “mysterious” whole-of-society strategy, which engages all aspects of society, integrates party-state organizations under CCP-rule in a comprehensive stratagem that aims to control, indoctrinate, and mobilize non-CCP masses—both native and foreign—in service of the Party’s policy objectives. The system that executes this political warfare strategy has been traditionally composed of multiple party, military, and state organizations, but this system has undergone centralization in recent years with the establishment of the CCP Central Committee’s Leading Small Group on United Front (中央統戰工作領導小 組), and updated in the recent re-organization of several State Council departments responsible for overseas Chinese, religious, and ethnic minority affairs under the CCP’s United Front Work Department (UFWD).2 The most well-known and successful United Front campaigns in CCP history are the ones with the Nationalist Party (KMT, Kuomintang). In alliances forged out of necessity, the KMT and CCP formally united forces at least twice to resist their common enemies prior to the formation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949: first to expel imperialists and warlords in China then to resist the Japanese invasion during the Second Sino-Japanese War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discipline of International Law in Republican China and Contemporary Taiwan
    Washington University Global Studies Law Review Volume 14 Issue 1 2015 The Discipline of International Law in Republican China and Contemporary Taiwan Pasha L. Hsieh Singapore Management University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Courts Commons, International Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Pasha L. Hsieh, The Discipline of International Law in Republican China and Contemporary Taiwan, 14 WASH. U. GLOBAL STUD. L. REV. 87 (2015), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_globalstudies/vol14/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Global Studies Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN REPUBLICAN CHINA AND CONTEMPORARY TAIWAN PASHA L. HSIEH ABSTRACT This Article examines the evolution of international law as a professional and intellectual discipline in the Republic of China (ROC), which has governed Mainland China (1912–1949) and post-1949 Taiwan. The ROC’s centennial development fundamentally shaped modern China’s course of foreign relations and postwar global governance. The Article argues that statism, pragmatism, and idealism define the major features of the ROC’s approach to international law. These characteristics transformed the law of nations into universally valid normative claims and prompted modern China’s intellectual focus on the civilized nation concept. First, the Article analyzes the professionalization of the discipline of international law.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Russia's Role in Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations
    “Russia and Cross Strait Relations” SHAOHUA HU Associate Professor and Chair Department of Government and Politics Wagner College [email protected] Scholars have scrutinized the role of the United States and even Japan in cross-Strait relations, but have downplayed, if not ignored, the role of Russia.1 Given the extensive studies that have been carried out on Russia’s China policy, the lack of attention given to this subject is woeful and even puzzling. Such deficiency may be attributed to Moscow’s seemingly unequivocal pro-Beijing policy, Russia’s loss of superpower status, and the lack of close ties between Russia and Taiwan. Whatever the reasons, the deficiency should be addressed, because Russia is both a global and a regional power, and because the policy differences between Russia and all other major powers demand explanation. This article attempts a systematic study of the Russian factor in cross-Strait relations. What form has Russia’s Taiwan policy taken in different eras? How important is Russia to Beijing’s Taiwan policy? What options might Russia have in the event of a cross-Strait conflict? These are the questions I seek to answer. The Evolution of Russia’s Taiwan Policy A review of Russian foreign policy helps us understand the present and anticipate the future. Russian leaders have not created their foreign policy out of the blue, but rather formulated it under given geographical and historical circumstances. No matter how changeable and complex history is, we may still be able to identify some key historical patterns. That scholars find much continuity in Russian foreign policy makes it even more important to familiarize ourselves with the past.
    [Show full text]