Hong Kong Public Opinion Program of Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute

PopPanel Research Report No. 20 cum Community Democracy Project Research Report No. 17 cum Community Health Project Research Report No. 13

Survey Date: 5 May to 7 May 2020

Release Date: 8 May 2020

Copyright of this report was generated by the Hong Kong Public Opinion Program (HKPOP) and opened to the world. HKPOP proactively promotes open data, open technology and the free flow of ideas, knowledge and information. The predecessor of HKPOP was the Public Opinion Programme at The University of Hong Kong (HKUPOP). “POP” in this publication may refer to HKPOP or HKUPOP as the case may be.

1

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Research Background

Initiated by the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute (HKPORI), the “Community Integration through Cooperation and Democracy, CICD” Project (or the “Community Democracy Project”) aims to provide a means for Hongkongers to re-integrate ourselves through mutual respect, rational deliberations, civilized discussions, personal empathy, social integration, and when needed, resolution of conflicts through democratic means. It is the rebuilding of our Hong Kong society starting from the community level following the spirit of science and democracy. For details, please visit: https://www.pori.hk/cicd.

The surveys of Community Democracy (CD) Project officially started on 3 January 2020, targeting members of “HKPOP Panel” established by HKPORI in July 2019, including “Hong Kong People Representative Panel” (Probability-based Panel) and “Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel” (Non-probability-based Panel). This report also represents Report No. 20 under HKPOP Panel survey series, as well as Report No. 17 under the CD Project survey series. Since CD Project aims to gauge the opinions of members in different communities, HKPORI needs to continuously recruit new panel members and map their profile with their respective constituency areas to form “HKPOP Community Panel” including “Community Representative Panel” and “Community Volunteer Panel” first, and then conduct the research.

In view of the outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (also known as “Wuhan Pneumonia”) in late January 2020, HKPOP kick-started the “Community Democracy Project: Community Health Module” or “Community Health Project” using a PopPanel survey design to study the public’s views on the epidemic and the Government’s relevant polices using small communities such as housing estates as the unit of analysis. The survey covers people’s views on their perceived chance of contracting pneumonia, appraisal on the government’s handling of the disease, impacts of the border closure, calls for strike by frontline medical staff, community outbreak, work-from-home arrangement, immigration controls, general use of face masks as well as the government's implementation of relevant policies. This is the Report No. 13 under the Community Health Project survey series. The special feature of the Community Health Project is the lowering of respondents’ age bracket to 12 years old, in order to obtain more comprehensive samples.

HKPOP sent out emails to all panel members at the beginning of the survey, inviting them to fill in the questionnaire at the designated online platform. Members were allowed to make repeated submissions, while only the last submission of each individual member would be used for analysis.

2 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Contact Information

Herewith the contact information of this Community Democracy survey:

Table 1: Detailed Contact Information

Survey method Online survey Target population HKPOP Panel samples, namely Hong Kong People Representative Panel (Probability-based Panel) and Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (Non-probability-based Panel) Weighting method The figures are rim-weighted according to 1) gender-age distribution of Hong Kong population and by District Councils population figures from Census and Statistics Department; 2) overall voting results, overall voter population and gender-age breakdown from Registration and Electoral Office; 3) rating distribution of Chief Executive from regular tracking surveys. Date of survey May 5, 3pm – May 7, 3pm Total sample size Probability-based Panel: 758 Non-probability-based Panel: 7,343 Response rate Probability-based Panel: 9.7% Non-probability-based Panel: 11.1% Sampling error [1] Sampling error of percentages at Sampling error of percentages at +/-3% at 95% confidence level +/-1% at 95% confidence level [1] All error figures in this release are calculated at 95% confidence level. “95% confidence level” means that if we were to repeat a certain survey 100 times with different random samples, we would expect 95 times having the population parameter within the respective error margins calculated. Because of sampling errors, when quoting percentages, journalists should refrain from reporting decimal places, whereas one decimal place can be used when quoting rating figures.

PopPanel Composition

Regarding data collection, survey data from both the Hong Kong People Representative Panel and Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel were collected in the form of online questionnaire.

Among them, the Hong Kong People Representative Panel comes from members of the “HKPOP Panel” recruited in regular random telephone surveys. HKPOP uses “HKPOP Panel” as a framework for conducting surveys for different research projects, any eligible family member in the household may be invited to participate in a specific research.

Meanwhile, members of the Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel are recruited online. Citizens only need to self-register in HKPORI website to participate in online questionnaires.

All panel data collected will be adjusted using rim-weighting, to minimize the effects of self-selection bias or participation bias. Details are documented in the Weighting Procedure section.

3 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Response Rate

HKPOP adopts a set of contact definition in compliance with most international standards. Historically, the social research community in Hong Kong has developed its own set of contact rates, cooperation rates, response rates, and so on. HKPOP normally reports the “success rate” for online surveys.

The calculation of the success rates in this study refers to the following tables.

Table 2: Calculation of success rate of the Hong Kong People Representative Panel (by HKPOP definition)

Success rate = Successful cases x 100.0% Panel size of the Hong Kong People Representative Panel 758 = x 100.0% 7,852 = 9.7%

Table 3: Calculation of success rate of the Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (by HKPOP definition)

Success rate = Successful cases x 100.0% Panel size of the Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel 7,343 = x 100.0% 66,279 = 11.1% .

4 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Weighting Procedure

HKPOP has continuously adopted and enhanced its weighting method over the past few decades. For this survey, HKPOP adopts a “18 by 3 by 10” weighting procedure involving three one-way variables, namely, district (18 cells), voting record (3 cells) and rating of Chief Executive (13 cells). Basically, the raw data of practically all random telephone surveys conducted by HKPOP are rim-weighted by the figures obtained from the Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department and/or Registration and Electoral Office so that the marginal distribution of the sample in terms of district and voting record would match with that of the general population. The marginal distribution of the sample in terms of “rating of Chief Executive” would match that of the general population in HKPOP’s regular tracking surveys. This rim-weighting method (sometimes called raking) is found to be the most practicable method in processing HKPOP’s survey data.

Specifically, the districts used for weighting are as follows:  Central and Western  Wan Chai  Eastern  Southern  Yau Tsim Mong  Sham Shui Po  Kowloon City  Wong Tai Sin  Kwun Tong  Tsuen Wan  Tuen Mun  Yuen Long  North  Tai Po  Sai Kung  Sha Tin  Kwai Tsing  Islands

5 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

The voting records used for weighting are as follows:

 Candidates of pro-democracy camp  Candidates of non-pro-democracy camp  Did not vote / blank/void vote

The “rating of Chief Executive” groupings used for weighting are as follows:

 0 mark  1-9 mark(s)  10-19 marks  20-29 marks  30-39 marks  40-49 marks  50 marks  51-60 marks  61-70 marks  71-80 marks  81-90 marks  91-99 marks  100 marks

6 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Quantitative Analysis Results

Results of the quantitative analyses of the Community Health survey are as follows:

Table 4: Q1 Survey results, by panel type; Survey period: 5–7/5/2020 Hong Kong People Representative Panel (Base=755) Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (Base=7,307) Opinion Question* Don't know / Don't know / Try to predict Average Try to predict Average hard to say hard to say Q1 What do you think is your chance of being infected with novel coronavirus 26% 74% 17% 21% 79% 15% pneumonia, also known as Wuhan pneumonia, in the coming one month? * Answer options included: 0-10 rating scale, others, and don’t know / hard to say

Table 5: Q2 Survey results, by panel type; Survey period: 5–7/5/2020 Hong Kong People Representative Panel (Base=758) Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (Base=7,334) Opinion Question* Satisfied Half-half Dissatisfied Mean Satisfied Half-half Dissatisfied Mean

Q2 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the government’s 38% 8% 54% 2.5 30% 11% 60% 2.4 performance in handling novel coronavirus pneumonia? * Answer options included: very much satisfied, somewhat satisfied, half-half, somewhat dissatisfied, very much dissatisfied and don’t know / hard to say

7

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Table 6: Q3 Survey results, by panel type; Survey period: 5–7/5/2020 Hong Kong People Representative Panel (Base=758) Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (Base=7,340) Opinion Question* Support Half-half Oppose Mean Support Half-half Oppose Mean

Q3 Overall speaking, how much do you support or oppose these 61% 27% 9% 3.8 56% 28% 13% 3.7 measures^? * Answer options included: very much support, somewhat support, half-half, somewhat oppose, very much oppose and don’t know / hard to say ^ The new measures announced by the government on May 5 afternoon.

Table 7: Q4 Survey results, by panel type; Survey period: 5–7/5/2020 Hong Kong People Representative Panel (Base=755) Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (Base=7,313) Don't Don't Opinion Question* Just in know / Just in know / Too early Too late Too early Too late time hard to time hard to say say Q4 Do you think these measures^ come too early, just in time or too 9% 62% 19% 10% 11% 55% 25% 9% late? * Answer options included: too early, just in time, too late and don’t know / hard to say ^ The new measures announced by the government on May 5 afternoon.

8

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Table 8: Q5 Survey results, by panel type; Survey period: 5–7/5/2020 Hong Kong People Representative Panel (Base=758) Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel (Base=7,332) Don't Don't Opinion Question* know / know / Too strict Just right Too loose Too strict Just right Too loose hard to hard to say say Q5 Do you think these measures^ are 19% 66% 7% 9% 22% 58% 10% 11% too strict, just right or too loose? * Answer options included: too strict, just right, too loose and don’t know / hard to say ^ The new measures announced by the government on May 5 afternoon.

9

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Qualitative Analysis Results

Question: “Do you have other comments on the government’s implementation of these measures?”

A total of 2,492 open-ended answers were collected and the views of respondents are summarized as follows:

Respondents’ views Related keywords (Number of times) (1) The prohibition on group gathering might have Suppression (333) slipped into political tools: Politics (259) Many respondents think that the prohibition on group Police (168) gathering is meant for "political suppression", for Abuse (100) example, to restrict people's freedom of assembly; and Unfair enforcement (99) there are also concerns about unfair enforcement of Rallies (99) this regulation. Selective enforcement (66) (2) The new measures are not implemented on a timely Late (92) manner: Slow (74) There are quite a number of views that the Know in hindsight (36) implementation of new measure are “too late”, Too long (2) criticizing the government “knows in hindsight”, and the measures are not effective. (3) The new measures are not supported by scientific Scientific basis (114) evidence and not reasonable: Rationale (13) Some comments are that the new measures lack Unreasonable (13) scientific support (e.g. rising the limit of group Unrealistic (5) gathering from 4 to 8 people, and requiring at least 1.5 meters between tables in restaurants). There are also views that the prohibition on group gathering are unreasonable, for example, taking public transport also involves high risk of inflection, but it is not included. (4) The border closure is of paramount importance: Border closure (194) There are quite a number of views that the Immigration (56) implementation of border closure is the most important Gate (39) to stop the spread of the epidemic, which would be more effective than prohibition on group gathering.

10

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13 (5) Relaxation or flexibility should be allowed under The prohibition on group gathering special circumstances: (603) Some mentioned that under certain preconditions, such Cancellation (182) as universal masking or strict implementation of the Relaxation (127) quarantine measures, the prohibition on group Discharge (25) gathering should be further relaxed or lifted. There are Flexibility (3) also comments that the closure or restriction of certain Withdrawal (4) venues should be entitled to some flexibility according to the actual situation, for example, the restriction on Restaurants (32) restaurants could be relaxed, but beauty parlours/ Bars (30) fitness centres/ mahjong premises/ amusement game Beauty parlours (17) centres should be handled with caution. Mahjong premises (41) Fitness centres (19) Amusement game centres (13) (6) Economic crackdown: Economy (40) There are a few comments that the measures have dealt Livelihood (4) a blow to the local economy, and hope the government Hitting businesses (1) could provide financial support to merchants or affected employees.

11

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Appendix

12

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Appendix 1: Demographic profile of respondents

Gender: Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Male 432 57.0% 357 47.1% 3,338 45.5% 3,458 47.1% Female 326 43.0% 401 52.9% 4,005 54.5% 3,885 52.9% Total 758 100.0% 758 100.0% 7,343 100.0% 7,343 100.0%

Age: Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % 12 - 29 73 9.7% 152 20.2% 966 13.2% 1,478 20.2% 30 - 39 151 20.0% 118 15.6% 1,922 26.2% 1,145 15.6% 40 - 49 170 22.5% 123 16.3% 2,142 29.2% 1,197 16.3% 50 - 59 213 28.2% 140 18.6% 1,604 21.9% 1,363 18.6% 60 or above 148 19.6% 221 29.2% 690 9.4% 2,142 29.2% Total 755 100.0% 755 100.0% 7,324 100.0% 7,324 100.0% Missing case(s) 0 0% 0 0% 19 19

13

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Education attainment: Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Primary or below 1 0.1% <1 <0.1% 17 0.2% 8 0.1% Secondary 192 25.3% 217 28.6% 1,105 15.1% 1,374 18.7% Tertiary or above 565 74.5% 541 71.4% 6,217 84.7% 5,960 81.2% Total 758 100.0% 758 100.0% 7,339 100.0% 7,342 100.0% Missing case(s) 0 0% 0 0% 4 1

Occupation: Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Administrators and professionals 273 36.2% 213 28.1% 3,206 43.8% 2,722 37.3% Clerks and service workers 183 24.2% 182 24.1% 1,986 27.1% 1,449 19.8% Workers 16 2.1% 13 1.7% 143 2.0% 111 1.5% Students 22 2.9% 67 8.8% 225 3.1% 499 6.8% Home-makers / housewives 45 6.0% 34 4.5% 392 5.4% 352 4.8% Others 216 28.6% 248 32.8% 1,372 18.7% 2,171 29.7% Total 755 100.0% 755 100.0% 7,324 100.0% 7,304 100.0% Missing case(s) 3 3 19 39

14

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

District:

Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Central & Western 25 3.3% 25 3.3% 271 3.7% 241 3.3% Wan Chai 15 2.0% 19 2.5% 170 2.3% 180 2.5% Eastern 75 9.9% 56 7.4% 687 9.4% 542 7.4% Southern 27 3.6% 27 3.6% 308 4.2% 262 3.6% Yau Tsim Mong 28 3.7% 34 4.4% 273 3.7% 325 4.4% Sham Shui Po 33 4.4% 42 5.5% 352 4.8% 407 5.5% Kowloon City 56 7.4% 43 5.7% 409 5.6% 414 5.6% Wong Tai Sin 39 5.1% 43 5.7% 409 5.6% 418 5.7% Kwun Tong 60 7.9% 70 9.2% 523 7.1% 677 9.2% Tsuen Wan 38 5.0% 52 6.8% 374 5.1% 498 6.8% Tuen Mun 51 6.7% 32 4.2% 491 6.7% 308 4.2% Yuen Long 60 7.9% 51 6.7% 480 6.5% 490 6.7% North 17 2.2% 65 8.6% 241 3.3% 634 8.6% Tai Po 41 5.4% 32 4.2% 380 5.2% 307 4.2% Sai Kung 59 7.8% 31 4.1% 632 8.6% 306 4.2% Sha Tin 85 11.2% 70 9.3% 814 11.1% 683 9.3% Kwai Tsing 39 5.1% 48 6.4% 407 5.5% 470 6.4% Islands 10 1.3% 19 2.5% 122 1.7% 181 2.5% Total 758 100.0% 758 100.0% 7,343 100.0% 7,343 100.0%

15

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

(Only for respondents aged 18 or above or refuse to answer age) Are you a registered voter: Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Yes 745 98.3% 661 87.2% 7,231 98.7% 6,508 88.8% No 13 1.7% 97 12.8% 95 1.3% 818 11.2% Total 758 100.0% 758 100.0% 7,326 100.0% 7,326 100.0%

(Only for respondents aged 18 or above or refuse to answer age) Political inclination: Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Pro-democratic camp 357 47.1% 173 22.8% 3,948 54.0% 2,071 28.3% Pro-establishment camp 21 2.8% 51 6.7% 29 0.4% 455 6.2% Localist 168 22.2% 105 13.9% 2,484 34.0% 1,345 18.4% Centrist 66 8.7% 93 12.2% 251 3.4% 1,015 13.9% Others 5 0.7% 6 0.8% 65 0.9% 107 1.5% No political inclination / politically neutral / don’t belong 130 17.2% 293 38.7% 398 5.4% 1,904 26.0% to any camp Don’t know / hard to say 11 1.5% 37 4.9% 140 1.9% 421 5.7% Total 758 100.0% 758 100.0% 7,315 100.0% 7,318 100.0% Missing case(s) 0 0 11 8

16

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

(Only for respondents aged 18 or above or refuse to answer age) Voted political camp: Raw sample Weighted sample Raw sample Weighted sample Freq % Freq % Freq % Freq % Democratic 605 79.8% 199 26.2% 6,793 92.7% 1,921 26.2% Non-democratic 80 10.6% 260 34.3% 132 1.8% 1,995 27.2% Did not vote / blank vote / void vote / don’t know / hard to say / 60 7.9% 202 26.7% 306 4.2% 2,593 35.4% refuse to answer Not a registered voter 13 1.7% 97 12.8% 95 1.3% 818 11.2% Total 758 100.0% 758 100.0% 7,326 100.0% 7,326 100.0%

17

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Appendix 2: Contact Information

Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Total valid samples 758 7,343 Survey period 5-7/5/2020 5-7/5/2020 Success rate 9.7% 11.1% Questionnaires sent out 7,852 66,279 Questionnaires received 782 7,662 Ineligible samples 2 73 Invalid samples 14 212 Incomplete samples 8 34 Standard error 1.8% 0.6% Sampling error 3.6% 1.1%

18

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Appendix 3: Quantitative analyses, by panel groups

Q1. What do you think is your chance of being infected with the Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Coronavirus disease, also known as Wuhan pneumonia, in the Percentages Percentages Frequencies Frequencies coming one month? (Base=749) (Base=7,302) Certainly not 154 20.5% 1,485 20.3% 10% chance 213 28.4% 2,357 32.3% 20% chance }Small chance 41 }484 5.5% }64.6% 744 }5,212 10.2% }71.4% 30% chance 50 6.7% 420 5.7% 40% chance 26 3.4% 207 2.8% 50% chance 55 7.4% 316 4.3% 60% chance 5 0.7% 88 1.2% 70% chance 3 0.4% 20 0.3% 80% chance 2 0.3% 40 0.5% }Large chance }12 }1.6% }172 }2.4% 90% chance <1 0.1% 4 0.1%

100% chance (Certainly will) 1 0.1% 21 0.3% Others 6 0.9% 44 0.6% Don’t know / hard to say 192 25.6% 1,558 21.3% Total 749 100.0% 7,302 100.0%

Mean 16.5% 15.3%

Standard error of mean 0.8% 0.2% Median 10.0% 10.0% Refuse to answer 9 41

19

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Q2. How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the government’s Percentages Percentages performance in handling novel coronavirus pneumonia? Frequencies Frequencies (Base=758) (Base=7,322)

Very much satisfied 75 9.9% 911 12.4% }Satisfied }289 }38.2% }2,163 }29.5% Somewhat satisfied 214 28.3% 1,253 17.1% Half-half 60 7.9% 788 10.8% Somewhat dissatisfied 67 8.9% 975 13.3% }Dissatisfied }409 }53.9% }4,370 }59.7% Very much dissatisfied 341 45.0% 3,395 46.4% Don’t know / hard to say 1 0.1% 1 0.0% Total 758 100.0% 7,322 100.0%

Mean values 2.5 2.4

Standard error of mean 0.1 <0.1

Median 2.0 2.0

Refuse to answer 0 21

Net value (Satisfied- Dissatisfied) -15.8% -30.1%

20

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Q3. Overall speaking, how much do you support or oppose Percentages Percentages these measures? Frequencies Frequencies (Base=758) (Base=7,327)

Very much support 216 28.6% 2,015 27.5% }Support }462 }61.0% }4,122 }56.3% Somewhat support 246 32.4% 2,107 28.8% Half-half 204 27.0% 2,067 28.2% Somewhat oppose 35 4.6% 579 7.9% }Oppose }70 }9.2% }929 }12.7% Very much oppose 35 4.6% 350 4.8% Don’t know / hard to say 22 2.9% 209 2.8% Total 758 100.0% 7,327 100.0%

Mean values 3.8 3.7

Standard error of mean <0.1 <0.1

Median 4.0 4.0

Refuse to answer 0 16

Net value (Support- Oppose) +51.8% +43.6%

21

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Q4. Do you think these measures come too early, just in time or Percentages Percentages too late? Frequencies Frequencies (Base=756) (Base=7,304) Too early 69 9.1% 775 10.6% Just in time 468 62.0% 4,006 54.9% Too late 141 18.7% 1,845 25.3% Don’t know / hard to say 77 10.2% 678 9.3% Total 756 100.0% 7,304 100.0%

Refuse to answer 2 39

Hong Kong People Representative Panel Hong Kong People Volunteer Panel Q5. Do you think these measures are too strict, just right or too Percentages Percentages loose? Frequencies Frequencies (Base=758) (Base=7,341) Too strict 141 18.6% 1,606 21.9% Just right 498 65.7% 4,221 57.5% Too loose 50 6.7% 717 9.8% Don’t know / hard to say 68 9.0% 796 10.8% Total 758 100.0% 7,341 100.0% Refuse to answer 0 2

22

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Appendix 4: Sample count for each constituency (452 in total) Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 1 Sha Tin R04 City One 4 50 54 2 Sai Kung Q09 Wai King 1 50 51 3 Kwun Tong J27 Laguna City 5 44 49 4 Kowloon City G07 Ho Man Tin 8 39 47 5 Wong Tai Sin H06 Lung Sing 3 43 46 6 Kwai Tsing S24 Greenfield 4 41 45 7 Eastern C08 Heng Fa Chuen 2 42 44 7 Sha Tin R29 Wu Kai Sha 7 37 44 7 Tuen Mun L31 Prime View 6 38 44 10 Tsuen Wan K12 Tsuen Wan Rural 2 40 42 10 Kwun Tong J28 King Tin 6 36 42 12 Kwun Tong J40 To Tai 3 38 41 12 Sai Kung Q28 Wan Po North 6 35 41 14 Sha Tin R28 Ma On Shan Town Centre 4 36 40 15 Sai Kung Q13 O Tong 3 36 39 16 Tsuen Wan K05 Tsuen Wan West 6 31 37 16 Sham Shui Po F15 Mei Foo South 0 37 37 16 Sham Shui Po F17 Mei Foo North 6 31 37 16 Tuen Mun L07 1 36 37

23

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 16 Southern D12 Chi Fu 2 35 37 21 Tsuen Wan K04 Hoi Bun 5 31 36 21 Eastern C01 Tai Koo Shing West 4 32 36 21 Yuen Long M35 Fairview Park 9 27 36 21 Tai Po P18 Shuen Wan 3 33 36 25 Eastern C17 Fortress Hill 6 29 35 25 North N07 Fanling South 1 34 35 25 Tsuen Wan K08 Discovery Park 3 32 35 25 Southern D01 Aberdeen 1 34 35 25 Central & Western A05 University 3 32 35 25 Sai Kung Q21 Wan Hang 2 33 35 31 Tai Po P19 Sai Kung North 1 33 34 32 Eastern C02 Tai Koo Shing East 1 32 33 32 Sha Tin R22 Sui Wo 3 30 33 32 Sha Tin R20 Tai Wai 2 31 33 32 Sai Kung Q10 Hoi Chun 2 31 33 32 Tuen Mun L04 4 29 33 32 Sha Tin R24 Chun Ma 4 29 33 32 Sha Tin R38 Di Yee 2 31 33 32 Eastern C25 5 28 33

24

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 32 Sha Tin R01 Sha Tin Town Centre 2 31 33 41 Eastern C26 6 26 32 41 Kowloon City G20 Whampoa West 3 29 32 41 Kowloon City G08 Kadoorie 6 26 32 41 Kwun Tong J04 Lai Ching 3 29 32 41 Sai Kung Q26 Nam On 2 30 32 41 Tuen Mun L14 4 28 32 41 Wong Tai Sin H24 Chi Choi 4 28 32 41 Tuen Mun L01 Tuen Mun Town Centre 2 30 32 49 Sha Tin R06 Wong Uk 3 28 31 49 Southern D06 South Horizons East 4 27 31 49 Tsuen Wan K13 Ting Sham 3 28 31 52 Yuen Long M27 Kingswood North 1 29 30 52 Eastern C04 Sai Wan Ho 1 29 30 54 Tsuen Wan K10 Luk Yeung 2 27 29 54 Sai Kung Q27 Kwan Po 4 25 29 54 Tai Po P16 Old Market & Serenity 5 24 29 54 Sai Kung Q20 Wai Yan 2 27 29 54 Kowloon City G19 Whampoa East 6 23 29 54 Tai Po P09 Wang Fuk 3 26 29

25

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 60 Sha Tin R37 Yu Yan 3 25 28 60 Sham Shui Po F13 Lai Chi Kok Central 2 26 28 60 Islands T04 Tung Chung South 2 26 28 60 Sham Shui Po F16 Mei Foo Central 1 27 28 60 Sha Tin R23 Fo Tan 3 25 28 60 Sha Tin R39 Bik Woo 4 24 28 60 Yau Tsim Mong E11 Tai Kok Tsui North 2 26 28 60 Sai Kung Q12 Fu Kwan 2 26 28 60 Tai Po P10 Tai Po Kau 1 27 28 60 Yau Tsim Mong E05 Charming 3 25 28 60 Wong Tai Sin H17 Ching Oi 4 24 28 60 Eastern C03 Lei King Wan 4 24 28 72 Wong Tai Sin H20 King Fu 3 24 27 72 Eastern C16 Braemar Hill 3 24 27 72 Eastern C19 3 24 27 72 Kowloon City G03 Ma Hang Chung 4 23 27 72 North N01 Luen Wo Hui 1 26 27 72 Tsuen Wan K11 Ma Wan 0 27 27 78 Yuen Long M22 Kingswood South 2 24 26 78 Southern D07 South Horizons West 1 25 26

26

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 78 Yuen Long M04 Yuen Lung 4 22 26 78 Eastern C21 3 23 26 78 Sha Tin R25 Hoi Nam 4 22 26 78 Sha Tin R27 Kam To 1 25 26 84 Sha Tin R05 Yue Shing 3 22 25 84 Sai Kung Q29 Wan Po South 1 24 25 84 Yuen Long M03 Fung Cheung 6 19 25 84 Southern D03 Ap Lei Chau North 0 25 25 84 Sha Tin R32 Kam Ying 3 22 25 84 Tsuen Wan K03 Tsuen Wan South 2 23 25 84 Eastern C10 3 22 25 84 Tai Po P13 Lam Tsuen Valley 4 21 25 84 Tai Po P12 San Fu 2 23 25 84 Sha Tin R33 Yiu On 3 22 25 84 Central & Western A11 Sai Ying Pun 3 22 25 95 Tuen Mun L02 1 23 24 95 Kwun Tong J30 Hiu Lai 6 18 24 95 Tuen Mun L27 3 21 24 95 Sham Shui Po F24 Yau Yat Tsuen 0 24 24 95 Eastern C06 Shau Kei Wan 3 21 24

27

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 95 Kowloon City G01 Ma Tau Wai 3 21 24 95 Wong Tai Sin H05 Fung Tak 1 23 24 102 Sai Kung Q19 Yan Ying 6 17 23 102 Tsuen Wan K14 Lai To 4 19 23 102 Wan Chai B05 Victoria Park 1 22 23 102 Kowloon City G09 Prince 2 21 23 102 Tuen Mun L16 6 17 23 102 Kwai Tsing S18 1 22 23 102 Sai Kung Q16 Hong King 2 21 23 102 Yuen Long M39 Pat Heung South 0 23 23 102 Yau Tsim Mong E08 Olympic 0 23 23 102 Yuen Long M09 Yuen Long Tung Tau 3 20 23 102 Sai Kung Q05 Hang Hau West 0 23 23 102 Sai Kung Q02 Pak Sha Wan 0 23 23 102 Eastern C18 City Garden 2 21 23 102 Kowloon City G21 Hung Hom Bay 2 21 23 116 Tai Po P14 Po Nga 3 19 22 116 Yuen Long M06 Shui Pin 2 20 22 116 Sai Kung Q18 Po Lam 2 20 22 116 Tai Po P17 Hong Lok Yuen 0 22 22

28

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 116 Kwun Tong J19 Lam Tin 3 19 22 116 Central & Western A09 Belcher 1 21 22 116 Yau Tsim Mong E17 East Tsim Sha Tsui & King's Park 2 20 22 116 Sai Kung Q15 Kwong Ming 0 22 22 116 Eastern C05 Aldrich Bay 3 19 22 116 Tai Po P15 Tai Wo 1 21 22 116 Eastern C20 Fort Street 0 22 22 116 Eastern C12 Fullview 0 22 22 116 Kowloon City G10 Kowloon Tong 3 19 22 129 Kwai Tsing S23 Tsing Yi Estate 1 20 21 129 Yuen Long M13 Ping Shan South 3 18 21 129 Sai Kung Q24 Fu Nam 1 20 21 129 Yuen Long M37 Kam Tin 2 19 21 129 Tuen Mun L19 2 19 21 129 Sha Tin R26 Chung On 3 18 21 129 Central & Western A15 Water Street 1 20 21 129 Wong Tai Sin H12 Tin Keung 2 19 21 129 Kwun Tong J32 Yuet Wah 0 21 21 129 Yau Tsim Mong E04 Yau Ma Tei South 4 17 21 129 Eastern C24 Quarry Bay 3 18 21

29

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 129 Southern D15 Wong Chuk Hang 2 19 21 129 Sai Kung Q08 Do Shin 3 18 21 129 Tai Po P03 Tai Po Central 1 20 21 129 Islands T05 Tung Chung Central 3 18 21 129 Kowloon City G02 Sung Wong Toi 1 20 21 129 Sai Kung Q03 Sai Kung Islands 2 19 21 129 Wong Tai Sin H19 Tsz Wan East 1 20 21 147 Sha Tin R11 Chun Fung 0 20 20 147 Yau Tsim Mong E14 Mong Kok East 1 19 20 147 Wong Tai Sin H07 San Po Kong 2 18 20 147 Sai Kung Q04 Hang Hau East 0 20 20 147 Sai Kung Q25 Tak Ming 2 18 20 147 Eastern C27 Kornhill Garden 1 19 20 147 Wan Chai B04 Causeway Bay 3 17 20 147 Sham Shui Po F02 Cheung Sha Wan 2 18 20 147 Kwai Tsing S17 Lai Wah 3 17 20 147 Wong Tai Sin H15 Chuk Yuen North 2 18 20 147 Central & Western A01 Chung Wan 0 20 20 147 Central & Western A06 Kennedy Town & Mount Davis 3 17 20 147 Sha Tin R13 Chui Tin 2 18 20

30

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 147 Central & Western A02 Mid Levels East 1 19 20 161 Yuen Long M05 Shap Pat Heung Central 3 16 19 161 Tai Po P07 Fu Ming Sun 2 17 19 161 Tai Po P02 Chung Ting 3 16 19 161 Kwai Tsing S31 Cheung On 1 18 19 161 Sha Tin R36 On Tai 2 17 19 161 Kwun Tong J02 Kowloon Bay 0 19 19 161 Sha Tin R31 Fu Lung 2 17 19 161 Eastern C07 A Kung Ngam 0 19 19 161 Tsuen Wan K07 Tsuen Wan Centre 1 18 19 161 Kwun Tong J36 Hong Lok 0 19 19 161 Central & Western A10 Shek Tong Tsui 1 18 19 161 Central & Western A12 Sheung Wan 2 17 19 161 Eastern C33 1 18 19 161 Kwun Tong J18 Hing Tin 3 16 19 161 Kwai Tsing S26 Cheung Hong 3 16 19 161 Kwai Tsing S25 Cheung Ching 0 19 19 177 Kwai Tsing S21 2 16 18 177 Yau Tsim Mong E07 Fu Pak 3 15 18 177 Kwai Tsing S22 Wai Ying 3 15 18

31

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 177 Eastern C22 1 17 18 177 Central & Western A07 Kwun Lung 2 16 18 177 Kwai Tsing S16 2 16 18 177 Tai Po P06 Yee Fu 3 15 18 177 Southern D13 Tin Wan 2 16 18 177 Wong Tai Sin H02 Lung Ha 2 16 18 177 Tsuen Wan K15 Allway 3 15 18 177 Wong Tai Sin H03 Lung Sheung 1 17 18 177 Sha Tin R30 Lee On 1 17 18 177 Sha Tin R35 Tai Shui Hang 1 17 18 177 Southern D17 Stanley & Shek O 0 18 18 177 Sha Tin R16 Wan Shing 1 17 18 177 Yau Tsim Mong E12 Tai Nan 4 14 18 193 Kwun Tong J39 Lower Ngau Tau Kok Estate 2 15 17 193 Yuen Long M12 Shap Pat Heung West 2 15 17 193 Wong Tai Sin H04 Fung Wong 0 17 17 193 North N06 Yan Shing 1 16 17 193 Central & Western A08 Sai Wan 0 17 17 193 Tuen Mun L11 2 15 17 193 Sha Tin R08 Pok Hong 5 12 17

32

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 193 Kowloon City G23 Ka Wai 4 13 17 193 Kowloon City G18 Hok Yuen Laguna Verde 1 16 17 193 Wong Tai Sin H10 Lok Fu 1 16 17 193 Sham Shui Po F08 Nam Cheong West 3 14 17 193 Tuen Mun L26 1 16 17 193 Tai Po P04 Tai Yuen 2 15 17 193 Southern D04 Lei Tung I 2 15 17 193 Tsuen Wan K06 Clague Garden 1 16 17 208 Kowloon City G25 Oi Chun 2 14 16 208 Wong Tai Sin H08 Tung Tau 0 16 16 208 Tuen Mun L20 Lok Tsui 0 16 16 208 Islands T07 Discovery Bay 0 16 16 208 Eastern C32 1 15 16 208 Eastern C28 2 14 16 208 Wong Tai Sin H13 Tsui Chuk & Pang Ching 2 14 16 208 Tuen Mun L08 1 15 16 208 Sha Tin R14 Hin Ka 0 16 16 208 Islands T06 Tung Chung North 2 14 16 208 Kwun Tong J21 Pak Nga 0 16 16 208 Sham Shui Po F06 Nam Cheong South 0 16 16

33

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 208 Kwai Tsing S30 Ching Fat 1 15 16 208 Southern D09 Wah Fu South 1 15 16 208 Wong Tai Sin H09 Tung Mei 3 13 16 208 Southern D11 Pokfulam 0 16 16 208 North N04 Wah Do 1 15 16 208 Kwun Tong J17 Kwong Tak 3 13 16 208 Kwai Tsing S13 Shek Lei South 0 16 16 208 Kowloon City G04 Ma Tau Kok 2 14 16 228 Wan Chai B10 Happy Valley 0 15 15 228 Central & Western A13 Tung Wah 2 13 15 228 Sha Tin R21 Chung Tin 2 13 15 228 Sham Shui Po F21 Lei Cheng Uk 1 14 15 228 Central & Western A03 Castle Road 3 12 15 228 Kwun Tong J12 Sau Mau Ping North 2 13 15 228 Tuen Mun L29 Tuen Mun Rural 0 15 15 228 Southern D08 Wah Kwai 2 13 15 228 Tuen Mun L30 1 14 15 228 Tuen Mun L15 0 15 15 228 Yuen Long M38 Pat Heung North 2 13 15 228 Kwai Tsing S14 0 15 15

34

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 228 North N17 Tin Ping East 0 15 15 228 Yuen Long M30 Fu Yan 2 13 15 228 Kwai Tsing S15 0 15 15 228 Kowloon City G11 Lung Shing 0 15 15 228 Sai Kung Q14 Sheung Tak 3 12 15 228 North N05 Wah Ming 0 15 15 246 Kwun Tong J20 Ping Tin 1 13 14 246 Sai Kung Q11 Po Yee 3 11 14 246 Kwun Tong J01 Kwun Tong Central 3 11 14 246 Sham Shui Po F14 Lai Chi Kok South 0 14 14 246 Tuen Mun L22 San King 1 13 14 246 Sai Kung Q01 Sai Kung Central 2 12 14 246 Tuen Mun L21 Lung Mun 4 10 14 246 Sha Tin R18 Tin Sum 2 12 14 246 Kowloon City G15 Hoi Sham 1 13 14 246 Kwai Tsing S28 Tsing Yi South 0 14 14 246 Islands T10 Cheung Chau 0 14 14 246 North N02 Fanling Town 3 11 14 246 Sha Tin R34 Heng On 0 14 14 246 Wan Chai B06 Tin Hau 3 11 14

35

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 246 Tai Po P05 Fu Heng 0 14 14 246 Wan Chai B13 Tai Fat Hau 0 14 14 246 Southern D05 Lei Tung II 4 10 14 246 Kwun Tong J29 Tsui Ping 2 12 14 246 Yau Tsim Mong E03 Jordan West 0 14 14 265 Sham Shui Po F01 Po Lai 1 12 13 265 Sai Kung Q06 Choi Kin 4 9 13 265 Sha Tin R17 Keng Hau 1 12 13 265 Sai Kung Q23 Hau Tak 1 12 13 265 North N03 Cheung Wah 3 10 13 265 Sham Shui Po F18 Lai Chi Kok North 1 12 13 265 Kowloon City G05 Lok Man 0 13 13 265 Kowloon City G24 Oi Man 1 12 13 265 North N13 Shek Wu Hui 1 12 13 265 Sha Tin R19 Chui Ka 0 13 13 265 Yau Tsim Mong E20 Tsim Sha Tsui Central 1 12 13 265 Yau Tsim Mong E16 Yau Ma Tei North 0 13 13 265 Tuen Mun L24 3 10 13 265 Eastern C09 1 12 13 265 Tai Po P11 Wan Tau Tong 2 11 13

36

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 265 Tuen Mun L13 1 12 13 265 Tuen Mun L18 0 13 13 265 Wan Chai B02 Oi Kwan 0 13 13 265 Kwai Tsing S01 1 12 13 265 Yau Tsim Mong E02 Kowloon Station 2 11 13 265 Southern D10 Wah Fu North 2 11 13 265 Sha Tin R15 Lower Shing Mun 0 13 13 265 Yuen Long M21 Tsz Yau 1 12 13 265 Wong Tai Sin H01 Lung Tsui 1 12 13 289 Sai Kung Q17 Tsui Lam 0 12 12 289 North N18 Queen's Hill 1 11 12 289 Sham Shui Po F22 Lung Ping & Sheung Pak Tin 3 9 12 289 Tsuen Wan K02 Yeung Uk Road 0 12 12 289 Yuen Long M17 Shing Yan 0 12 12 289 Tuen Mun L06 Yau Oi North 0 12 12 289 Kwun Tong J24 Yau Chui 1 11 12 289 Tuen Mun L03 On Ting 1 11 12 289 Sha Tin R03 Wo Che Estate 2 10 12 289 Eastern C23 Healthy Village 0 12 12 289 Wan Chai B09 Broadwood 1 11 12

37

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 289 Wong Tai Sin H11 Wang Tau Hom 0 12 12 289 Kowloon City G06 Sheung Lok 1 11 12 289 Wan Chai B12 Southorn 0 12 12 289 Yuen Long M16 Ping Shan Central 1 11 12 289 Sha Tin R12 Sun Tin Wai 2 10 12 289 Tuen Mun L10 Hing Tsak 0 12 12 289 Yuen Long M34 Ping Shan North 2 10 12 289 Central & Western A04 Peak 1 11 12 289 North N15 Fung Tsui 2 10 12 289 Sham Shui Po F10 Lai Kok 1 11 12 310 Kwai Tsing S27 Shing Hong 3 8 11 310 Wan Chai B07 Tai Hang 0 11 11 310 Sham Shui Po F05 Nam Cheong East 1 10 11 310 Kwun Tong J07 Jordan Valley 1 10 11 310 Kwai Tsing S19 0 11 11 310 Tsuen Wan K01 Tak Wah 4 7 11 310 Central & Western A14 Centre Street 1 10 11 310 North N12 Choi Yuen 0 11 11 310 Kowloon City G17 To Kwa Wan South 1 10 11 310 Wan Chai B08 Jardine's Lookout 2 9 11

38

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 310 Kwun Tong J05 Ping Shek 0 11 11 310 Sai Kung Q22 King Lam 2 9 11 310 Eastern C29 Lower Yiu Tung 1 10 11 310 Eastern C11 Siu Sai Wan 3 8 11 310 Yau Tsim Mong E09 Cherry 0 11 11 310 Eastern C15 Mount Parker 2 9 11 310 Eastern C34 Yue Wan 1 10 11 310 Kwai Tsing S06 Kwai Chung Estate South 4 7 11 310 Kwun Tong J03 Kai Yip 1 10 11 310 Yuen Long M02 Yuen Long Centre 0 11 11 310 Yuen Long M24 Shui Wah 0 11 11 310 Eastern C31 2 9 11 310 Wong Tai Sin H23 Choi Wan West 2 9 11 310 Wan Chai B03 Canal Road 2 9 11 310 Kwun Tong J11 Kwun Tong On Tai 1 10 11 310 Wong Tai Sin H16 Tsz Wan West 1 10 11 310 Sham Shui Po F19 Un Chau 2 9 11 310 North N11 Sheung Shui Rural 0 11 11 310 Wong Tai Sin H25 Choi Hung 3 8 11 339 North N08 Shing Fuk 2 8 10

39

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 339 Sham Shui Po F12 Pik Wui 1 9 10 339 Yuen Long M18 Tin Shing 4 6 10 339 Kwun Tong J09 Sheung Shun 0 10 10 339 Tuen Mun L05 Yau Oi South 1 9 10 339 Yuen Long M19 Tin Yiu 1 9 10 339 Kwai Tsing S08 Shek Yam 0 10 10 339 Kwai Tsing S03 Kwai Shing East Estate 2 8 10 339 Sham Shui Po F09 Fu Cheong 1 9 10 339 Kwun Tong J25 Yau Lai 2 8 10 339 Kwun Tong J31 Po Lok 2 8 10 339 Tuen Mun L23 Leung King 0 10 10 339 Sham Shui Po F04 Shek Kip Mei 1 9 10 339 Tsuen Wan K19 Lei Muk Shue East 0 10 10 339 Tai Po P08 Kwong Fuk & Plover Cove 3 7 10 339 Kwai Tsing S09 Tai Pak Tin West 1 9 10 339 Yuen Long M07 Nam Ping 0 10 10 339 Wan Chai B01 Hennessy 0 10 10 357 Yuen Long M29 Ching King 0 9 9 357 Sham Shui Po F23 Ha Pak Tin 2 7 9 357 Yau Tsim Mong E13 Mong Kok North 0 9 9

40

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 357 Wan Chai B11 Stubbs Road 2 7 9 357 Wong Tai Sin H18 Ching On 0 9 9 357 Sha Tin R10 Jat Chuen 0 9 9 357 Islands T09 Lamma & Po Toi 0 9 9 357 Kwai Tsing S20 Kwai Shing West Estate 1 8 9 357 Kowloon City G16 To Kwa Wan North 2 7 9 357 Kwai Tsing S04 Upper Tai Wo Hau 0 9 9 357 Sham Shui Po F11 Fortune 1 8 9 357 Tai Po P01 Tai Po Hui 1 8 9 357 Yuen Long M32 Tin Heng 1 8 9 357 Tuen Mun L12 So Kwun Wat 1 8 9 357 Eastern C14 0 9 9 372 Yuen Long M01 Fung Nin 1 7 8 372 Islands T01 Lantau 1 7 8 372 Kwai Tsing S05 Lower Tai Wo Hau 0 8 8 372 North N10 Yu Tai 1 7 8 372 Yuen Long M15 Ha Tsuen 1 7 8 372 Eastern C30 Upper Yiu Tung 1 7 8 372 North N14 Tin Ping West 0 8 8 372 Eastern C13 2 6 8

41

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 372 Yuen Long M08 Pek Long 0 8 8 372 Yau Tsim Mong E06 Mong Kok West 2 6 8 372 Sha Tin R02 Lek Yuen 0 8 8 372 Sha Tin R07 Sha Kok 0 8 8 372 Kowloon City G22 Hung Hom 0 8 8 372 Wong Tai Sin H22 Choi Wan South 1 7 8 372 Tsuen Wan K16 Cheung Shek 0 8 8 372 Southern D02 Ap Lei Chau Estate 2 6 8 372 Kwun Tong J13 Sau Mau Ping Central 1 7 8 372 Sha Tin R40 Kwong Hong 2 6 8 372 Sha Tin R41 Kwong Yuen 1 7 8 372 Kwun Tong J10 On Lee 0 8 8 372 Yuen Long M10 Shap Pat Heung North 1 7 8 372 Yau Tsim Mong E19 Jordan South 3 5 8 372 Yuen Long M36 San Tin 1 7 8 395 Sham Shui Po F25 Nam Shan, Tai Hang Tung & Tai Hang Sai 0 7 7 395 Yau Tsim Mong E15 Mong Kok South 0 7 7 395 Yuen Long M20 Yiu Yau 0 7 7 395 Kwai Tsing S02 Kwai Luen 0 7 7 395 Southern D14 Shek Yue 1 6 7

42

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 395 Yau Tsim Mong E10 Tai Kok Tsui South 0 7 7 395 Kwun Tong J08 Shun Tin 0 7 7 395 Kwun Tong J15 Sau Mau Ping South 0 7 7 395 Kowloon City G14 Kai Tak Central & South 0 7 7 395 Kwun Tong J33 Hip Hong 0 7 7 395 Kwun Tong J06 Choi Tak 2 5 7 395 Yuen Long M26 Chung Pak 1 6 7 395 Yuen Long M25 Chung Wah 0 7 7 395 Kwun Tong J37 Ting On 0 7 7 395 Kowloon City G12 Kai Tak North 0 7 7 395 Islands T02 Mun Yat 0 7 7 395 Sha Tin R09 Shui Chuen O 0 7 7 412 Sham Shui Po F03 Nam Cheong North 2 4 6 412 Kwai Tsing S07 Kwai Chung Estate North 2 4 6 412 Kwun Tong J22 Chun Cheung 1 5 6 412 Kwai Tsing S29 Cheung Hang 0 6 6 412 Kwai Tsing S10 Tai Pak Tin East 1 5 6 412 North N16 Sha Ta 0 6 6 412 Wong Tai Sin H21 Choi Wan East 0 6 6 412 Tsuen Wan K18 Lei Muk Shue West 0 6 6

43

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 412 Kwai Tsing S12 Shek Lei North 0 6 6 412 Kwun Tong J16 Po Tat 1 5 6 412 Sham Shui Po F20 So Uk 0 6 6 412 Yuen Long M28 Yuet Yan 0 6 6 412 Kwun Tong J35 Lok Wah North 1 5 6 412 Kwun Tong J34 Lok Wah South 1 5 6 412 Yuen Long M31 Yat Chak 1 5 6 412 Tsuen Wan K09 Fuk Loi 1 5 6 412 Tuen Mun L09 1 5 6 412 North N09 Ching Ho 0 6 6 412 Tsuen Wan K17 Shek Wai Kok 0 6 6 431 Islands T03 Yat Tung Estate North 0 5 5 431 Yuen Long M23 Shui Oi 0 5 5 431 Kwai Tsing S11 1 4 5 431 Eastern C35 Kai Hiu 0 5 5 431 Wong Tai Sin H14 Chuk Yuen South 0 5 5 431 Yuen Long M11 Shap Pat Heung East 1 4 5 431 Yuen Long M33 Wang Yat 0 5 5 431 Islands T08 Peng Chau & Hei Ling Chau 0 5 5 431 Sai Kung Q07 Kin Ming 1 4 5

44

HKPOP Community Health Module Report No. 13

Hong Kong Hong Kong People People Representative Volunteer Rank District Council Code Constituency Panel Panel Total 431 Tuen Mun L28 1 4 5 431 Southern D16 Bays Area 0 5 5 431 Kowloon City G13 Kai Tak East 3 2 5 431 Yau Tsim Mong E01 Tsim Sha Tsui West 1 4 5 444 Kwun Tong J26 Yau Tong West 0 4 4 444 Kwun Tong J38 Upper Ngau Tau Kok Estate 0 4 4 444 Kwun Tong J23 Yau Tong East 0 4 4 444 Yuen Long M14 Hung Fuk 0 4 4 444 Tuen Mun L17 Wu King 0 4 4 444 Sham Shui Po F07 Nam Cheong Central 1 3 4 450 Yau Tsim Mong E18 Jordan North 0 3 3 450 Kwun Tong J14 On Tat 0 3 3 452 Tuen Mun L25 Po Tin 0 1 1 Total 736 7,163 7,899 Refuse to answer 22 180 202

45

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Appendix 5: Survey questionnaire (5-7/5/2020) HKPORI Pandemic Survey

Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute is politically neutral, we welcome different opinions. All personal data will be kept strictly confidential. You can fill in the questionnaire again at any time to express your latest views, and your last submission will be collated. For enquiries, please email us at [email protected] .

*Required

(Registered member) Panel ID: * (Please do not alter the pre-filled ID) ______

(Registered member) Invitation token: * (Please do not alter the pre-filled token) ______

(New member) Please first register as a HKPOP Panel member at https://www.pori.hk/hkpop-panel * ○ Already registered as a member earlier (Please go to the survey platform by clicking on the designated hyperlink sent to you by email) ○ Have just registered as a member ○ Not yet registered as a member, and will register after completing the survey (Please note: Your response will be removed if you have not yet successfully registered as a member at the time of data analysis)

Eligibility Confirmation

(New member) Email used / will be used in registration: * ______

Are you a Hong Kong resident aged 12 or above? * ○ Yes ○ No

46

HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Your District Council If you have answered the following questions in this survey series since late January, you may choose to skip the relevant questions on this page. We will use the past data you provided in this survey series for the analysis.

Your District Council: ○ Central & Western District ○ Wan Chai ○ Eastern District ○ Southern District ○ Yau Tsim Mong ○ Sham Shui Po ○ Kowloon City ○ Wong Tai Sin ○ Kwun Tong ○ Tsuen Wan ○ Tuen Mun ○ Yuen Long ○ North District ○ Tai Po ○ Sai Kung ○ Sha Tin ○ Kwai Tsing ○ Islands

District Council Constituency Area (XXX District) If you have answered the following questions in this survey series since late January, you may choose to skip the relevant questions on this page. We will use the past data you provided in this survey series for the analysis.

District Council Constituency Area: ○ XX ○ XX ○ XX ○ ……

47 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Opinion Questions

What do you think is your chance of being infected with novel coronavirus pneumonia, also known as Wuhan pneumonia, in the coming one month? (Please select the closest answer. If you have another answer, please fill in the last item.) ○ Certainly not ○ 10% chance ○ 20% chance ○ 30% chance ○ 40% chance ○ 50% chance ○ 60% chance ○ 70% chance ○ 80% chance ○ 90% chance ○ 100% chance (Certainly will) ○ Don’t know / hard to say ○ Other: ______

Opinion Questions

What do you think is the appropriate timing to completely resume normal work under the pandemic? (Please select the closest answer; If there is no suitable answer at all, please select “don’t know / hard to say” and wait till later to fill in your opinions.) ○ Should completely resume normal work unconditionally ○ Number of recovered cases exceeds newly confirmed cases each day ○ Number of newly confirmed cases each day falls to a single digit ○ No more newly confirmed local case ○ No more newly confirmed local or imported case ○ No more newly confirmed case in N consecutive days (Please input N in the next page) ○ Don’t know / hard to say

Opinion Questions

How many consecutive days with no more newly confirmed case do you think there should be before it is appropriate to completely resume normal work? ______

48 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Opinion Questions

What do you think is the appropriate timing to completely lift the regulation prohibiting gatherings of more than a specific number of people in public places under the pandemic? (Please select the closest answer; If there is no suitable answer at all, please select “don’t know / hard to say” and wait till later to fill in your opinions.) ○ Should completely lift the regulation prohibiting gatherings of more than a specific number of people in public places unconditionally ○ Number of recovered cases exceeds newly confirmed cases each day ○ Number of newly confirmed cases each day falls to a single digit ○ No more newly confirmed local case ○ No more newly confirmed local or imported case ○ No more newly confirmed case in N consecutive days (Please input N in the next page) ○ Don’t know / hard to say

Opinion Questions

How many consecutive days with no more newly confirmed case do you think there should be before it is appropriate to completely lift the regulation prohibiting gatherings of more than a specific number of people in public places? ______

Opinion Questions

The government has just announced the following relaxed-regulations: 1. No more than 8 persons can be seated together at one table within any catering premises. 2. The following 7 premises can be re-opened but need to follow specific arrangements: game centres, fitness centres, places of amusement including cinemas, beauty parlours, massage establishments and mahjong premises. 3. Bars and pubs can be re-opened but need to follow strict regulations. 4. The following 4 premises will remain closed: karaoke establishments, bathhouses, party rooms, clubs or nightclubs. 5. The maximum number of participants for gathering is relaxed from 4 to 8.

Overall speaking, how much do you support or oppose these measures? ○ Very much support ○ Somewhat support ○ Half-half ○ Somewhat oppose ○ Very much oppose

49 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

○ Don’t know / hard to say

Do you think these measures come too early, just in time or too late? ○ Too early ○ Just in time ○ Too late ○ Don’t know / hard to say

Do you think these measures are too strict, just right or too loose? ○ Too strict ○ Just right ○ Too loose ○ Don’t know / hard to say

Do you have other comments on the government’s implementation of these measures? (If you do not have other comments, please leave this space blank.) ______

Opinion Questions

How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the government’s performance in handling novel coronavirus pneumonia? ○ Very much satisfied ○ Somewhat satisfied ○ Half-half ○ Somewhat dissatisfied ○ Very much dissatisfied ○ Don’t know / hard to say

Please rate on a scale of 0 to 100 your extent of support to the Chief Executive Carrie Lam, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Chief Executive Carrie Lam? [For weighting purpose only] (To opt for “don’t know / hard to say”, please input 8888) ______

50 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Other Opinions

Please provide your suggestions on the environmental hygiene and public health of your estate or community, so that we can relay them to relevant District Councillors or authorities: (If you do not have any suggestion, or do not want to revise your previous suggestion, please leave this space blank. Comments submitted before May 5 would not be counted in this round of survey, while for repeated submissions after May 5, only the last non-empty submission will be included in the final results.) ______

Do you have any needs which you want us to forward to your District Councillor or other persons you name here? (Please write down your contacts) (The request you make here is not part of our study, we simply want to bridge people who need help with people who can help.) ______

51 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Personal Information If you have answered the following questions in this survey series since late January, you may choose to skip the relevant questions on this page. We will use the past data you provided in this survey series for the analysis.

Gender ○ Male ○ Female

Age ______

Age range (If prefer not to provide exact age) ○ 12 - 14 ○ 15 - 17 ○ 18 - 19 ○ 20 - 24 ○ 25 - 29 ○ 30 - 34 ○ 35 - 39 ○ 40 - 44 ○ 45 - 49 ○ 50 - 54 ○ 55 - 59 ○ 60 - 64 ○ 65 - 69 ○ 70 or above

Educational attainment (The highest level attended, regardless of whether you have completed the course, including what you are attending) ○ No formal schooling / kindergarten ○ Primary ○ Lower secondary (Secondary 1 to 3) ○ Upper secondary (Secondary 4 to 7 / DSE / Yi Jin) ○ Tertiary: non-degree course (including diploma / certificate / sub-degree course) ○ Tertiary: bachelor degree course ○ Tertiary: postgraduate school or above

52 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Occupation (Owner / self-employed / freelance / part time / civil servant are not valid answers, please answer according to the job nature or content) ○ Administrator and professional ○ Clerical and service worker ○ Production worker ○ Student ○ Home-maker / housewife ○ Retired person ○ Unemployed / between jobs / other non-employed ○ Other: ______

What is your usual spoken language? ○ Cantonese ○ Putonghua ○ Other Chinese dialect ○ English ○ Other: ______

What is your ethnicity? ○ Chinese ○ Filipino ○ Indonesian ○ White ○ Indian ○ Nepalese ○ Pakistani ○ Thai ○ Japanese ○ Other Asian ○ Other: ______

Which of the following best describes your political inclination? ○ Localist ○ Pro-democracy camp ○ Centrist ○ Pro-establishment camp ○ No political inclination / politically neutral / do not belong to any camp ○ Don’t know / hard to say ○ Other: ______

53 HKPOP Community Health Project Report No. 13

Which candidate did you vote for in the 2019 District Council Election? ○ Candidate of pro-democracy camp, including localist ○ Candidate of non-pro-democracy camp, including pro-establishment camp and centrist ○ Don’t know / hard to say ○ Blank / void vote ○ Did not vote (was a registered voter of the election) ○ Did not vote (was not a registered voter of the election)

End of Questionnaire Thank you for completing the survey. For enquiries, please email us at [email protected] or call us at 3844 3111 during office hours.

We are working with a social enterprise to match the supply and demand of civil resources. Do you have masks to donate/ lend out for four weeks? If yes, please go to the platform of the Civil Resources Matching Program at https://arcg.is/10WT1S to fill in relevant information, thank you!

54