Making Your Mind up About the How of Creation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Reality, Science and the Supernatural CAN SCIENCE SUPPORT BELIEF in a CREATOR GOD?
Reality, Science and the Supernatural CAN SCIENCE SUPPORT BELIEF IN A CREATOR GOD? John Brain Copyright © John Brain 2016 PAGE 1 To my wife Joyce for her invaluable support PAGE 2 Contents Preface p 6 Chapter 1 The Project p 14 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Main Doubts Materialism and mind/matter relationship Evolution Scientific and personal explanation Supporting evidence from science 1.3 A Project Outline 1.4 Key Points Chapter 2 Materialism and Reality p 30 2.1 Introduction 2.2. Modern physical sciences 2.3 The nature of matter 2.3.1 Looking inwards Quantum weirdness Vibrating strings of energy The Theory of chaos 2.3.2 Looking upwards Dark Mystery 2.4 Discussion 2.5 Key Points Chapter 3 Evolution and Reality p 53 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Darwinian evolution 3.3 Three viewpoints on human development Young earth creationism Intelligent design Evolution 3.4 Does belief in God prevent acceptance of the theory of evolution 3.5 Does evolution need God? 3.6 Theistic evolution What is theistic evolution? Why can evolution be such a cruel process? Does Theistic evolution introduce a “God of the Gaps”? PAGE 3 3.7 Discussion 3.8 Key Points Chapter 4 Science and Reality p 74 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Advances in Science – emergence of a new reality Biology Physical Sciences 4.3 A More Reliable Explanation of Reality Some dogmas of modern science No “Theory of Everything” No satisfactory explanation of quantum physics More intriguing problems 4.4 The Limitations of Science Science is continually changing Science is not geared to answer “Why” -
The God Delusion Or the Dawkins Delusion? Stephen Clark
Review Article: The God Delusion or the Dawkins Delusion? Stephen Clark The God Delusion Richard Dawkins, namely, that all religions are really saying the same Bantam Press, London, 2006. 406pp. Price: £20 kind of thing. The fact that 'ordinary', pleasant and of The Dawkins Delusion Alister McGrath people can wire themselves to explosives and blast a with Joanna Collicutt McGrath, few dozen people into shards and shreds of flesh SPCK, London, 2007. 78pp. Price: £7.99 comes as a nasty jolt to those who have bought into this kind of nonsense, so there then follows a 'Dawkins, Richard: Charles Simonyi Professor for furiously frantic, government attempt to distinguish the Public Understanding of Science, Oxford 'extremists' (or 'fundamentalists': for many people University; Fellow of New College, Oxford; the terms are synonymous) from 'mainline' religion, zoologist, with high reputation in the field of where all is sweetness and light. Running parallel to ethology (see his The Extended Phenotype); highly this is the philosophical context. The 'conflict thesis' successful author of numerous popular works on invented by T.H. Huxley in the nineteenth century science; his writings characterised by clarity and (that religion and science are necessarily sworn elegance; style marred somewhat by a literary enemies), though merely a piece of political pugilistic streak, most in evidence when words s~ch propaganda, (after all, Faraday, Maxwell, and Lord as 'God', 'Jesus', 'religion', and related terms are In Kelvin were the premier 'scientists' of the view; this tendency borders on the manic when the nineteenth century and were devout Christians) words 'creationism' and its cognates and 'intelligent filtered through to the public consciousness and design' appear; this lapse in style could be a became widely accepted earlier in the twentieth worrying sign of Obsessional Compulsive Disorder century. -
Is Christianity Unscientific?
PHILOSOPHERS 2/Day 4 Is Christianity Unscientific? Atheist Sam Harris: ‘James Watson, the co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, a Nobel laureate, and the original head of the Human Genome Project, recently [asserted] in an interview that people of African descent appear to be innately less intelligent than white Europeans. A few sentences, spoken off the cuff, resulted in academic defenestration… Watson’s opinions on race are disturbing, but his underlying point was not, in principle, unscientific… there is, at least, a possible scientific basis for his views. While Watson’s statement was obnoxious, one cannot say that his views are utterly irrational or that, by merely giving voice to them, he has repudiated the scientific worldview and declared himself immune to its further discoveries. Such a distinction would have to be reserved for Watson’s successor at the Human Genome Project, Dr. Francis Collins.’1 After developing some relevant definitions, this session will proffer a schema for understanding the range of issues raised by the claim that Christianity is "unscientific". Peter S. Williams studied philosophy at Cardiff University (BA), Sheffield University (MA) and at the University of East Anglia in Norwich (MPhil). He then spent three years as a student pastor at Holy Trinity church Leicester before moving to Southampton to work alongside the Christian educational charity Damaris Trust (www.damaris.org), where as ‘Philosopher in Residence’ he leads Philosophy and Ethics conferences for sixth form students as well as undertaking various writing, speaking and broadcasting engagements. Peter is also Assistant Professor in Communication and Worldviews at Gimlekollen School of Journalism and Communication in Norway. -
Book Review: God's Design for Man and Woman Jeremy M
Cedarville University DigitalCommons@Cedarville Biblical and Theological Studies Faculty School of Biblical and Theological Studies Publications 8-2015 Book Review: God's Design for Man and Woman Jeremy M. Kimble Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/ biblical_and_ministry_studies_publications Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Kimble, Jeremy M., "Book Review: God's Design for Man and Woman" (2015). Biblical and Theological Studies Faculty Publications. 325. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/biblical_and_ministry_studies_publications/325 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Cedarville, a service of the Centennial Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biblical and Theological Studies Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Cedarville. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 40 Issue 2 August 2015 EDITORIAL: Some Reflections on Pastoral Leadership 195 D. A. Carson OFF THE RECORD: Can Antigone Work in a Secularist Society? 198 Michael J. Ovey Editor’s Note: Adam in Evangelical Theology 201 Brian J. Tabb Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin: A Review Essay 203 Stephen N. Williams Another Riddle without a Resolution? A Reply to Stephen 218 Williams Hans Madueme The Lost World of Adam and Eve: A Review Essay 226 Richard E. Averbeck Response to Richard Averbeck 240 John H. Walton Communicating the Book of Job in the Twenty-First Century 243 Daniel J. Estes PASTORAL PENSÉES: Five Truths for Sufferers from the Book 253 of Job Eric Ortlund Book Reviews 263 DESCRIPTION Themelios is an international, evangelical, peer-reviewed theological journal that expounds and defends the historic Christian faith. -
Rescuing Darwin
Rescuing Darwin God and evolution in Britain today by Nick Spencer and Denis Alexander what Theos is Theos is a public theology think tank which exists to undertake research and provide commentary on social and political arrangements. The word “Theos” and our descriptor, “the public theology think tank”, reflect our overall aim of putting God “back” into the public domain. Theos is about social, public theology; about public wisdom. what Theos stands for Faith is on the public agenda in a way that is unprecedented in recent times. Theos aims to shape events, not simply react to them. We aspire to speak wisdom into the increasingly crowded market- place of ideas and seek to demonstrate that religion in public debate is not dangerous or plain irrelevant, but that it is crucial to enable such public debate to connect with the communities it seeks to serve. We believe that faith is personal but it can never be private. what Theos works on Theos undertakes research on a wide range of subject areas. We believe that every issue is a moral issue and reject notions of a sacred/secular divide. what Theos provides Theos provides: • high-quality research, reports and publications; • an events’ programme (including public debates, an annual Theos lecture and an extensive fringe programme at the party conferences); • news, information and analysis to media companies and other opinion formers, with a one-stop information line available to journalists; and • an informative website, www.theosthinktank.co.uk In addition to our independently driven work, Theos provides research, analysis and advice to individuals and organisations across the private, public and not-for-profit sectors. -
Science and Christianity: an Introductory Course for Homeschoolers
Test of FAITH Science and Christianity: An Introductory Course for Homeschoolers www.testoffaith.com/homeschool Copyright © 2012 The Faraday Institute for Science and Religion, www.faraday-institute.org. Extracts from Test of FAITH: Science and Christianity Unpacked used with permission of Paternoster. Extracts from Test of FAITH: Science and Religion Meet used with permission of The Stapleford Centre. Unless otherwise stated, Scripture quotations are taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Hodder & Stoughton, a member of the Hodder Headline Group. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked (ESV) are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version® (ESV®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Acknowledgements This material was developed and written by Abigail McFarthing. Design & illustrations: Contrapositive (http://www.contrapositive.tv/). Layout: Abigail McFarthing. Project management: Dr Ruth Bancewicz. Editor: Tara Smith. With thanks to Dr. Denis Alexander, Colin Bell, Dr. Clare Redfern, Dr. Douglas Hayworth, homeschool forum moderator at the American Scientific Affiliation (http://asa3online.org/), and the homeschooling families who trialled this material in Spring 2012. Funded by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation. www.testoffaith.com Test of FAITH Science and Christianity An Introductory Course for Homeschoolers A three-week course for high