Aerodynamic Performances of Rounded Fastback Vehicle Giacomo Rossitto, Christophe Sicot, Valérie Ferrand, Jacques Borée, Fabien Harambat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aerodynamic Performances of Rounded Fastback Vehicle Giacomo Rossitto, Christophe Sicot, Valérie Ferrand, Jacques Borée, Fabien Harambat Aerodynamic performances of rounded fastback vehicle Giacomo Rossitto, Christophe Sicot, Valérie Ferrand, Jacques Borée, Fabien Harambat To cite this version: Giacomo Rossitto, Christophe Sicot, Valérie Ferrand, Jacques Borée, Fabien Harambat. Aero- dynamic performances of rounded fastback vehicle. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechani- cal Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, SAGE Publications, 2017, pp.1211-1221. 10.1177/0954407016681684. hal-01449542 HAL Id: hal-01449542 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01449542 Submitted on 30 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Open Archive TOULOUSE Archive Ouverte ( OATAO ) OATAO is an open access repository that collects the work of Toulouse researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible. This is an author-deposited version published in: http://oatao.univ-toulous e.fr/ Eprints ID: 17498 To cite this version : Rossitto, Giacomo and Sicot, Christophe and Ferrand, Valérie and Borée, Jacques and Harambat, Fabien Aerodynamic performances of rounded fastback vehicle. (2017) Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: journal of automobile engineering. ISSN 0957-6509 Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407016681684 Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository administrator: [email protected] Aerodynamic performances of rounded fastback vehicle Giacomo Rossitto1,2,ChristopheSicot2, Vale´rie Ferrand3, Jacques Bore´e2 and Fabien Harambat1 Abstract Experimental and numerical analyzes were performed to investigate the aerodynamic performances of a realistic vehicle with a different afterbody rounding. This afterbody rounding resulted in a reduction to drag and lift at a yaw angle of zero, while the crosswind performances were degraded. Rounding the side pillars generated moderate changes to the drag and also caused important lift reductions. A minor effect on the drag force was found to result from the opposite drag effects on the slanted and vertical surfaces. The vorticity distribution in the near wake was also analyzed to under- stand the flow field modifications due to the afterbody rounding. Crosswind sensitivity was investigated to complete the analysis of the aerodynamic performances of the rounded edges models. Additional tests were conducted with geometry modifications as spoilers and underbody diffusers. Keywords Rounded edges, drag, vorticity, wake analysis, crosswind, spoilers, underbody diffuser 1Introduction the backlight and the downstream shift of the rotating structures developing in the near wake. Fuller et al.4 For the last decade car manufacturers have been facing analyzed the benefits of rounding the rear side pillars the challenging task of reducing fuel consumption and on the Davis model. They observed that rounded edges CO2 emissions. In response to this, optimization algo- generate a different wake structure dominated by the rithms have been applied to generate new vehicle shapes interaction between the longitudinal vortices and the to minimize the aerodynamic drag. Since the obtained separated region. The rounded edges model resulted in optimum shapes have no brand differentiating details, a drag and lift reduction of 11% and 25% respectively. nowadays stylists are trying to give back a brand signa- The impact of afterbody rounding was mentioned also ture by proposing ‘‘non-conventional shapes. In that during the development of the Tesla Model S by Palin framework, the important rounding of the rear pillars et al.5 Important curved side pillars were avoided to becomes a differentiation strategy. The current study reduce the highly dynamic wake, which caused large suggests to quantify the influence of such afterbody variation in the base pressure. rounding on the flow field and on the drag development From the literature review, it appears that rounding over a fastback vehicle. afterbodies considerably affects the aerodynamic loads Very few papers have addressed the question of the and flow development, but a systematic investigation curvature of the rear edges in aerodynamic vehicle per- into the effects of changing the radii of the side formances. One of the first works was presented by 1 2 Gilhaus et al. and Howell. Thanks to balance mea- 1 surements, it was found that rounded pillars reduced PSA Groupe, Velizy–Villacoublay, France 2Institut Pprime, UPR-3346 CNRS, ENSMA, Universite´ de Poitiers, both drag and rear lift but yawing moment had a pro- France nounced increase. Only recently, were advanced tech- 3Institut Supe´rieur de l’Ae´ronautique et de l’Espace (ISAE-SUPAERO), niques used to achieve better understanding of the Universite´ de Toulouse, France afterbody rounding. Thacker et al.3 showed that round- Corresponding author: ing the edge between the roof and the rear slant of the Giacomo Rossitto, PSA Groupe, Centre Technique Velizy A, Velizy - Ahmed body results in a 10% drag reduction. Authors Villacoublay, France. attributed this reduction to the fully attached flow over Email: [email protected] backlight edges was not reported. To complement the meters long and has a test section which is 2 meters recent study proposed by the same authors6 over a sim- high, 5.2 meters wide and 6 meters long. It has a maxi- plified car model (Ahmed body), the present study mum free stream velocity of 53 m/s. The wind tunnel addresses this question on a realistic car model blockage ratio was 1.4%. The wind tunnel experiments equipped with various rear pillars curvatures. Special were conducted with a fixed ground and the model is care is taken to understand how the modified flow on placed over a false floor. All of the data were obtained the backlight interacts with the near wake and how this at 40 m/s which gives a Reynolds number based on the promotes drag and lift changes. length of the model of 2.6e6. Starred velocities are nor- Four rear ends were analyzed by combining PIV malized by the free stream velocity. A six components data to balance surface pressure measurements to fully balance was used to measure the aerodynamic forces characterize the flow structures and the associated acting on the model. The drag and lift coefficients were aerodynamic forces. The zero yaw case was first calculated as follows explored before focusing on the crosswind effects. F Complementary numerical simulations were systemati- d, l Cd, l = 1 2 cally applied to complete the experimental data and to 2 rU0S help the physical analysis. Geometry modifications, by where F is the force measured by the balance, r the den- means of spoilers and underbody diffusers, were inves- sity of the air, and S the frontal surface area of the tigated to understand their sensitivity to the side edges model. The precision of the balance was 0.001 for the rounding. drag coefficient Cd and 0.002 for the lift coefficient Cl. Static surface pressure was recorded by 40 pressure 2 Experimental and numerical set-up probes over the vertical surface of the rear end. Thirty- five probes were located on the driver side and the rest The model and its relevant dimensions are reported in were located on the passenger side to check the symme- Figure 1. Four rear ends are tested; they differ by their try of the static surface pressure over the vertical base. side pillars curvature. The curvature radius is given as a Even thought the non-symmetric underbody should percentage of the model span, i.e. 300 mm. The model have induced asymmetry in the flow the comparison equipped with sharp pillars having 0% radius is referred between the pressure probes, not reported here for brev- to as S0 and it is considered as the reference case. The ity, resulted in negligible differences. Those probes were others models are S8, S20, and S40. All of the rear ends connected to a SCANdaq 8000 acquisition system. The have the same curvature at the end of the roof to avoid acquisition rate was 40 Hz for 3000 samples giving 75 s flow separation. The corresponding radius is chosen to of time recording. The static surface pressure coefficient maximize the room for the rear passengers for a fixed at one point i was computed from the expression backlight angle of 23 degrees. The model features a rea- listic non symmetric underbody with an exhaust line. It P(i) À P0 CP(i)= 1 2 does not have open front air intake. The horizontal pro- 2 rU0 jection of the slanted surface, j = 440 mm, will be used as a reference length. Starred spatial coordinates are where P(i) is the static pressure of point (i), P0 the sta- normalized by the reference length. tic pressure measured upstream of the model. The static The experimental results reported in this work were accuracy of the system is 613 Pa, i.e. 0.015 Cp. obtained from tests conducted in the PSA Groupe wind Furthermore, PIV measurements were performed in tunnel of La Ferte´Vidame. The Eiffel wind tunnel is 52 the wake of the model. The laser sheet was set by a 2*120 mJ Nd:Yag Quantum Big Sky Laser. The Dantec Flowsense 4M mkII camera (2024 pixels by 2024 pixels) was equipped with 105 mm lenses which generated a 462 mm by 462 mm field of view. 2D PIV was per- formed on the symmetry (x,z) plane Y*=0. For all the PIV measurements, post-processing was performed with a final interrogation window of 16*16 pixels, after an initial window of 32*32 pixels, with an overlap of 50% in horizontal and vertical directions.
Recommended publications
  • Steel Structure Damage Analysis
    SteelStructure DamageAnalysis Textbook Version:13.3 ©2011-2013Inter-IndustryConferenceonAutoCollisionRepiar DAM12-STMAN1-E Thispageisintentionallyleftblank. Textbook SteelStructureDamageAnalysis Contents Introduction..............................................................................................................................7 ObligationsToTheCustomerAndLiability.......................................................................... 7 Module1-VehicleStructures................................................................................................13 TypesOfVehicleConstruction........................................................................................... 13 TheCollision...................................................................................................................... 15 AnalyzingVehicleDamage................................................................................................ 18 AnalyzingVehicleDamage(con't)..................................................................................... 20 MeasuringForDamageAnalysis.........................................................................................25 ModuleWrap-Up............................................................................................................... 33 Module2-StructuralDamageAnalysis.................................................................................37 GeneralRepairConsiderations........................................................................................... 37
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla Motors
    AUGUST 2014 TESLA MOTORS: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, OPEN INNOVATION, AND THE CARBON CRISIS DR MATTHEW RIMMER AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH COUNCIL FUTURE FELLOW ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW The Australian National University College of Law, Canberra, ACT, 0200 Work Telephone Number: (02) 61254164 E-Mail Address: [email protected] 1 Introduction Tesla Motors is an innovative United States manufacturer of electric vehicles. In its annual report for 2012, the company summarizes its business operations: We design, develop, manufacture and sell high-performance fully electric vehicles and advanced electric vehicle powertrain components. We own our sales and service network and have operationally structured our business in a manner that we believe will enable us to rapidly develop and launch advanced electric vehicles and technologies. We believe our vehicles, electric vehicle engineering expertise, and operational structure differentiates us from incumbent automobile manufacturers. We are the first company to commercially produce a federally-compliant electric vehicle, the Tesla Roadster, which achieves a market-leading range on a single charge combined with attractive design, driving performance and zero tailpipe emissions. As of December 31, 2012, we had delivered approximately 2,450 Tesla Roadsters to customers in over 30 countries. While we have concluded the production run of the Tesla Roadster, its proprietary electric vehicle powertrain system is the foundation of our business. We modified this system
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla Autopilot : Semi Autonomous Driving, an Uptick for Future Autonomy
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395 -0056 Volume: 03 Issue: 09 | Sep-2016 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Tesla Autopilot : Semi Autonomous Driving, an Uptick for Future Autonomy Shantanu Ingle1, Madhuri Phute2 1Department of E&TC, Pune Institute of Computer Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India 2 Department of E&TC, Pune Institute of Computer Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - Manual driving has certainly changed the way response to traffic conditions. Once the driver arrives at the we travel and explore different parts of the globe, with total destination, Model S or Model X scans for a parking space human control and with human intuitions and previous and parallel parks on the driver's command[2]. In the new driving experiences. But manual control doesn’t ensure safety Autopilot, the instrument cluster’s new driver focused and zero fatalities in every possible driving condition. design shows the real-time information used by the car to Autonomous driving is the answer to that problem. However, intelligently determine the vehicle’s behavior in that artificial intelligence hasn't yet touched every aspect of moment relative to its surroundings[3]. Along with the technology. In this paper we present a brief overview about autopilot feature, the driving behavior of each Tesla car, how Tesla Motor’s semi autonomous driving technology called while navigating through different road conditions, is shared Tesla Autopilot is changing the way we navigate and transport to its central server. Based on machine learning and Tesla by incorporating state of the art current artificial intelligence design engineer recommendations, a new feature update is and hardware technology, and enhancing the next generation developed and launched to every other Tesla car on planet.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Mustang Fastback & Convertible
    STANDARD FEATURES 12-volt powerpoints (2) Mirrors – Power sideview with integrated Air conditioning blind spot mirrors 2017 MUSTANG FASTBACK & CONVERTIBLE Ambient lighting (Premium only) Power windows and door locks Rear sequential light-emitting diode (LED) 1 Audio – Premium AM/FM stereo/single-CD Sports Car Class player and clock turn signal lamps ® Models: V6, EcoBoost, EcoBoost Premium, GT, GT Premium Audio – SiriusXM® Satellite Radio with Rear-wheel drive (RWD) 6-month trial subscription (Premium only) Remote Keyless Entry System Cruise control Selectable-effort electronic Engine – 3.7L Ti-VCT V6 (V6 only) power-assisted steering ® Engine – 2.3L EcoBoost® I-4 (EcoBoost only) SYNC with 4.2" color LCD screen in center stack Engine – 5.0L Ti-VCT V8 (GT only) SYNC 3 with 8" LCD capacitive touchscreen with AppLink,™ 911 Assist® and 2 smart-charging Front and rear stabilizer bars USB ports (Premium only) Intelligent Access with push-button start Tilt/telescoping steering column Limited-slip rear differential Transmission – 6-speed manual STANDARD SAFETY & SECURITY AdvanceTrac® electronic stability control LATCH – Lower Anchors and Tether Anchors for Airbags – Driver’s knee, glove-box-door- Children in rear outboard seating positions integrated knee and front-seat side MyKey® Airbags – Side-curtain (fastback only) Perimeter alarm Brakes – 4-wheel Anti-Lock Brake System (ABS) Personal Safety System™ for driver and front Brakes – Power-assisted 4-wheel disc passenger with dual-stage front airbags Illuminated Entry System Rear view camera ® Individual Tire Pressure Monitoring System SecuriLock Passive Anti-Theft System (TPMS; excludes spare) Side-intrusion door beams SOS Post-Crash Alert System™ AVAILABLE FEATURES Adaptive cruise control and forward collision Reverse Sensing System warning with brake support, and rain-sensing Transmission – 6-speed SelectShift® automatic windshield wipers with paddle shifters, and Remote Start System Audio – Shaker™ Pro Audio System Mustang GT Premium.
    [Show full text]
  • Update: California's Electric Vehicle Market
    www.theicct.org BRIEFING MAY 2017 Update: California’s electric vehicle market This briefing summarizes data on the development of the electric vehicle market in California through 2016. It quantifies electric vehicle market growth across California cities and metropolitan areas and provides U.S. market context. INTRODUCTION California has seen much faster uptake of electric vehicles than elsewhere in the U.S. and most places around the world. This briefing updates our assessment of the 2015 California market1 and quantifies key developments through 2016. It includes metropolitan area data and city-level data, providing greater resolution on markets where electric vehicle uptake is the highest. The paper analyzes uptake of battery- electric vehicles (BEVs) and plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs), excluding conventional gasoline-electric hybrids. It is important to understand that California accounts for almost half of the U.S. market for plug-in electric vehicles. California represents 12% of the U.S. population, 14% of the economy, and 12% of new light-duty vehicle sales. (See Table 1.) Electric vehicle sales in the state since 2011 totaled 269,000, about 48% of U.S electric vehicle purchases. Public vehicle charging infrastructure in California represents 31% of the U.S. infrastructure, including a quarter of the public direct-current fast charging. 1 Searle, S., Pavlenko, N., Lutsey, N. (2016). Leading edge of electric vehicle market development in the United States: An analysis of California cities. International Council on Clean Transportation. Retrieved from http:// www.theicct.org/ev-markets-calif-cities-sept2016 Prepared by Nic Lutsey. BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ICCT BRIEFING Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
    EFiled: Sep 06 2016 07:12PM EDT Transaction ID 59520160 Case No. 12723- IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ELLEN PRASINOS, derivatively on behalf ) TESLA MOTORS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) C.A. No. ELON MUSK, BRAD W. BUSS, ROBYN ) M. DENHOLM, IRA EHRENPREIS, ) ANTONIO J. GRACIAS, STEPHEN T. ) JURVETSON, KIMBAL MUSK, ) LYNDON RIVE, PETER RIVE, JOHN H. ) N. FISHER, JEFFREY B. STRAUBEL, D ) SUBSIDIARY, INC., AND SOLARCITY ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defendants, ) ) -and- ) ) TESLA MOTORS, INC., a Delaware ) Corporation, ) ) Nominal Defendant ) VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT Plaintiff Ellen Prasinos (“Plaintiff”), by and through her undersigned counsel, assert this action derivatively on behalf of Tesla Motors, Inc. (“Telsa” or the “Company”) against defendants Elon Musk, Brad W. Buss, Robyn M. Denholm, Ira Ehrenpreis, Antonio J. Gracias, Stephen T. Jurvetson and Kimbal Musk (collectively, the “Board” or the “Director Defendants”), along with Lyndon Rive, Peter Rive, John H. N. Fisher, J.B. Straubel, D Subsidiary, Inc., and 1 ME1 23271632v.1 SolarCity Corporation (“SolarCity”). Plaintiff alleges, upon information and belief based upon, inter alia , the investigation made by her attorneys, except as to those allegations that pertain to the Plaintiff herself, which are alleged upon knowledge, as follows: SUMMARY OF THE ACTION 1. Elon Musk (“Musk”), a smart and charismatic businessman, wants to save the world by “making life multi-planetary”, and “expedit[ing] the move from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy towards a solar electric economy.” While Musk’s goal to save the world may be admirable, he uses unethical and illegal tactics to achieve that goal, especially when his personal financial interests and legacy are at stake.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Analysis of a Composite B-Pillar for Side-Impact Protection of Occupants in a Sedan
    MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF A COMPOSITE B-PILLAR FOR SIDE-IMPACT PROTECTION OF OCCUPANTS IN A SEDAN A Thesis by Santosh Reddy Bachelor of Engineering, VTU, India, 2003 Submitted to the College of Engineering and the faculty of Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science May 2007 MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF A COMPOSITE B-PILLAR FOR SIDE-IMPACT PROTECTION OF OCCUPANTS IN A SEDAN I have examined the final copy of thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Mechanical Engineering. __________________________________ Hamid M. Lankarani, Committee Chair We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance ___________________________________ Kurt soschinske, Committee Member ___________________________________ M.Bayram Yildirim, Committee Member ii DEDICATION To My Parents & Sister iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my graduate advisor, Dr. Hamid M. Lankarani, who has been instrumental in guiding me towards the successful completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Kurt Soschinske and Dr. M. Bayram Yildirim for reviewing my thesis and making valuable suggestions. I am indebted to National Institute for Aviation Research (NIAR) for supporting me financially throughout my Master’s degree. I would like to acknowledge the support of my colleagues at NIAR, especially the managers Thim Ng, Tiong Keng Tan and Kim Leng in the completion of this thesis. Special thanks to Ashwin Sheshadri, Kumar Nijagal, Arun Kumar Gowda, Siddartha Arood, Krishna N Pai, Anup Sortur, ShashiKiran Reddy, Sahana Krishnamurthy, Praveen Shivalli, Geetha Basavaraj, Akhil Kulkarni, Sir Chin Leong, Evelyn Lian, Arvind Kolhar in encouragement and suggestions throughout my Masters degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla Model S
    Model S Premium Electric Sedan An evolution in automobile engineering Tesla’s advanced electric powertrain delivers exhilarating performance. Unlike a gasoline internal combustion engine with hundreds of moving parts, Tesla electric motors have only one moving piece: the rotor. As a result, Model S acceleration is instantaneous, silent and smooth. Step on the accelerator and in as little as 3.1 seconds Model S is travelling 60 miles per hour, without hesitation, and without a drop of gasoline. Model S is an evolution in automobile engineering. All-Wheel Drive Dual Motor Dual Motor Model S is a categorical improvement on conventional all-wheel drive systems. With two motors, one in the front and one in the rear, Rear Wheel Drive Model S digitally and independently controls torque to the front and rear wheels. The result is unparalleled traction control in all conditions. Conventional all-wheel drive cars employ complex mechanical linkages to distribute power from a single engine to all four wheels. This sacrifices efficiency in favor of all weather traction. In contrast, each Model S motor is lighter, smaller and more efficient than its All-Wheel Drive Dual Motor rear wheel drive counterpart, providing both improved range and faster acceleration. All-wheel drive is standard on Model S 70D and available as an option on Model S 85. Model S Performance comes standard with All-Wheel Drive Dual Motor, pairing the high performance rear motor with a high efficiency front motor to achieve supercar acceleration, from zero to 60 miles per hour in 3.1 seconds. Performance All-Wheel Drive Highest Safety Rating in America THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION Model S is designed from the ground up to be the safest car on the road, as proven by a 5-star rating in all categories of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Business and Economics
    A Work Project, presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics. Tesla: A Sequence of Belief Ted Lucas Andersson, 34028 A Project carried out on the Master in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Paulo Soares de Pinho 03-01-2020 Abstract: Title: Tesla: A Sequence of Belief This case analyses the many challenges and achievements of a start-up company on its pursuit to take on the traditional players in an industry that is difficult to enter and succeed in. Additionally, this case details the road Tesla embarked on which tested investor confidence as Tesla strived to deliver on its increasingly ambitious goals. Furthermore, the case explores the strategic fit of merging two companies that are operating in two different industries but face similar financial problems arising from increasing debt levels and lack of profits. Keywords: Capital Raising, Strategy, Mergers & Acquisitions, Conflict of Interest This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209). 1 Introduction On November 17, 2016, Jason Wheeler, Tesla’s CFO, had just received confirmation that the deal had closed for his company’s much-debated acquisition of SolarCity – a solar energy company that designs, finances and installs solar power systems. With leadership celebrations on the evening’s agenda Jason could not help but to ponder on the future of the growing company.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Rear Pillar Geometry on Fastback Wake Structures. Joshua Fuller
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository The importance of rear pillar geometry on fastback wake structures. Joshua Fuller. Martin A Passmore (Corresponding Author) Department of Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering, Stewart Miller Building, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK Tel; +44 (0)1509 227264 Fax: +44 (0)1509 227 275 [email protected] The wake of a fastback type passenger vehicle is characterised by trailing vortices from the rear pillars of the vehicle. These vortices strongly influence all the aerodynamic coefficients. Working at model scale, using two configurations of the Davis model with different rear pillar radii, (sharp edged and 10mm radius) the flow fields over the rear half of the models were investigated using balance measurements, flow visualisations, surface pressure and PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) measurements. For a small geometry change between the two models, the changes to the aerodynamic loads and wake flow structures were unexpectedly large with significant differences to the strength and location of the trailing vortices in both the time averaged and unsteady results. The square edged model produced a flow field similar to that found on an Ahmed model with a sub-critical backlight angle. The round edged model produced a flow structure dominated by trailing vortices that mix with the wake behind the base of the model and are weaker. This flow structure was more unsteady than that of the square edged model. Consequently, although both models can be described as having a wake dominated by trailing vortices, there are significant differences to both the steady state and unsteady flow fields that have not been described previously.
    [Show full text]
  • Automobile Engineering ) Model Answer
    MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION (Autonomous) (ISO/IEC - 27001 - 2005 Certified) _____________________________________________________________________________________________ WINTER – 15 EXAMINATION Subject Code: 17526 (Automobile Engineering ) Model Answer Important Instructions to examiners: 1) The answers should be examined by key words and not as word-to-word as given in the model answer scheme. 2) The model answer and the answer written by candidate may vary but the examiner may try to assess the understanding level of the candidate. 3) The language errors such as grammatical, spelling errors should not be given more Importance (Not applicable for subject English and Communication Skills). 4) While assessing figures, examiner may give credit for principal components indicated in the figure. The figures drawn by candidate and model answer may vary. The examiner may give credit for any equivalent figure drawn. 5) Credits may be given step wise for numerical problems. In some cases, the assumed constant values may vary and there may be some difference in the candidate’s answers and model answer. 6) In case of some questions credit may be given by judgement on part of examiner of relevant answer based on candidate’s understanding. 7) For programming language papers, credit may be given to any other program based on equivalent concept. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Q1.A ( a) Functions of transmission system of an automobile like, (1M per point) i. To transmit power from the engine to the rear wheels of the VEHICLE, ii. To make reduced speed available, to rear wheels of the VEHICLE, iii. To alter the ratio of wheel speed and engine speed/torque in order to suit the field conditions and iv.
    [Show full text]
  • Revology 1968 Mustang Gt 2+2 Fastback Models, Colors, Trim and Wheel Options Colors
    REVOLOGY 1968 MUSTANG GT 2+2 FASTBACK MODELS, COLORS, TRIM AND WHEEL OPTIONS COLORS VINTAGE SOLID VINTAGE METALLIC CONTEMPORARY CANDY APPLE RED ACAPULCO BLUE METALLIC ARGENTO NURBURGRING RAVEN BLACK BRITTANY BLUE METALLIC CARRERA WHITE METALLIC WIMBLEDON WHITE SUNLIT GOLD METALLIC CHALK MEADOWLARK YELLOW LIME GOLD METALLIC GIALLO MODENA DIAMOND BLUE METALLIC JET BLACK METALLIC PRESIDENTIAL BLUE METALLIC LAVA ORANGE HIGHLAND GREEN METALLIC MIAMI BLUE GULFSTREAM AQUA NEBULA GRAY PEARL TAHOE TURQUOISE METALLIC ROSSO CORSA ROYAL MAROON METALLIC 1| COLORS GT STRIPES BLACK BLUE RED WHITE REVOLOGY 1965-1966 MUSTANG GT CONVERTIBLE 2| GT STRIPES WHEELS AMERICAN RACING MAGNUM AMERICAN RACING CLASSIC 500 VN500, 17x8 AND 17x9.5 TORQ THRUST VN215, 17x8 AND 17x9.5 REVOLOGY 1965-1966 MUSTANG GT CONVERTIBLE AMERICAN RACING SHELBY FORGELINE DS3, 17x10 FORGELINE GZ3, 17x10 VN427, 17x8 AND 17X9.5 3| WHEELS SPECIAL EDITION FEATURE PACKAGE BLACK INTERIOR WITH QUARTER 17” CLASSIC TORQ THRUST WHEELS WITH DELETE QUARTER PANEL ORNAMENTS CUT WALNUT TRIM DARK CHARCOAL GRAY PAINTED CENTERS AND ROCKER PANEL MOLDINGS REVOLOGY 1965-1966 MUSTANG GT CONVERTIBLE SATIN BLACK PAINTED LAMP PANEL DELETE SIDE EMBLEMS, SIDE STRIPES DUAL EXHAUST WITH CHROME AND TAIL LAMP BEZELS AND HORSE & CORRAL TIPS 4|SPECIAL EDITION FEATURE PACKAGE INTERIOR COLORS STANDARD LEATHERETTE TRIM FULL NAPPA LEATHER TRIM BLACK BLACK, PORSCHE RED, PORSCHE IVORY, MERCEDES CHARCOAL GRAY, SCHWARZ FLAMENCOROT PORZELLAN PORSCHE ACHATGRAU RED LIGHT BEIGE, NAVY BLUE, PORSCHE BROWN, MERCEDES MEDIUM TAN, FERRARI
    [Show full text]